Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Saturday, July 11, 2026

The Embodiment of Becoming (15)



ESSAY FIFTEEN
III. The Philosophy of Reality

Reality → Ontology → Metaphysics → Interpretation → Ethics → Participation

The Embodiment of Becoming

Metaphysics XV – The Achievement of Being

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT


We begin with reality.
We learn its language.
We discover its grammar.
We search for its meaning.
We find our orientation.
We answer with our lives.
And in answering,
discover that we have become collegial participants
in the very reality we sought to understand.
- R.E. Slater


Essay Outline
Preface
I. Embodiment Is the Achievement of Becoming
II. Endlessly Formative Cycles of Becoming
III. Embodiment Makes History Possible
IV. Embodiment Opens Participation
V. Embodiment Makes Reality Generatively Habitable
VI. The Achievement of Being
Conclusion: Returning to Reality
Bibliography


Preface

The preceding essays have argued that relation is fundamental to reality and that becoming is the generative activity through which reality continually unfolds. Yet an important philosophical question remains. If reality is fundamentally relational and continually becoming, why does the world present itself with such remarkable stability? Why do persons endure? Why do galaxies persist? Why do organisms, cultures, and civilizations develop recognizable identities rather than dissolving into perpetual change?

The answer seems to lie in the achievement of embodiment.

Reality does not become aimlessly. Its histories of relation and becoming continually give rise to coherent patterns capable of acquiring presence, persistence, and identity. Becoming therefore should not be understood as endless motion alone. It is equally the continual realization of embodied realities whose histories remain open to further transformation.

This insight also begins to reconcile one of philosophy's oldest conversations. Western philosophy has often contrasted being with becoming, treating permanence and change as competing descriptions of reality. Yet a process-relational metaphysics suggests another possibility. Being and becoming need not be understood as opposites. Rather,

being may be understood as the achievement of becoming,

while

becoming continually renews the possibilities of being.

Therefore, embodiment occupies a pivotal place within an open relational metaphysics. It marks the point at which coherent histories become sufficiently integrated to acquire enduring presence within the world. Every embodied reality carries within itself the history of relations through which it emerged while simultaneously participating in the ongoing history through which reality continues to unfold.

This essay therefore explores embodiment not as a merely physical condition but as a metaphysical achievement. It asks how realities acquire presence without abandoning becoming, how identity emerges without requiring permanence, and why the enduring world around us should be understood not as the denial of process but as one of its most remarkable accomplishments.

Ultimately, embodiment reminds us that reality is neither static nor chaotic. It is a universe in which -

relation continually becomes,

becoming continually forms coherence,

and coherence continually achieves embodied existence.

In this way, being itself becomes one of the great achievements of reality's ongoing adventure.


I. Embodiment Is the Achievement of Becoming

Becoming seeks embodiment.
Embodiment opens participation.
- R. E. Slater

Being is not the opposite of becoming.
It is one of becoming's greatest achievements.
- R. E. Slater

For centuries, philosophy has often treated being and becoming as opposing ways of understanding reality. One tradition has emphasized permanence, stability, and enduring substance. The other has emphasized change, process, and continual transformation. Much of Western metaphysics has therefore been shaped by the tension between these two great intuitions.

An open relational process metaphysics suggests another possibility.

Being need not be understood as the denial of becoming.

Nor should becoming be understood as the destruction of being.

Rather, becoming continually gives rise to being, while being continually provides the embodied stability through which becoming may proceed further.

The relationship is therefore reciprocal rather than oppositional!

Embodiment marks the meeting place of these two movements.

Every embodied reality represents a history of successful becoming that has achieved sufficient coherence to acquire presence within the world. Its stability is real. Its identity is genuine. Yet neither exists apart from the relational histories through which they continually arose and continue to develop.

The familiar world quietly demonstrates this truth everywhere we look. A mountain is not merely a static object but the embodiment of immense geological histories. A forest is not simply a collection of trees but the embodied achievement of countless generations of ecological becoming. A culture embodies histories of language, memory, imagination, and shared life. Even a human person is not a finished substance but the continually embodied history of biological, psychological, social, and relational becoming.

Embodiment therefore should never be mistaken for the end of becoming.

It is becoming made present.

Reality does not abandon becoming in order to achieve being.

Reality continually becomes by achieving new forms of embodied existence.

The proverbial mustard seed beautifully illustrates this movement. Its significance does not lie merely in becoming a tree. Rather, the tree itself becomes the embodied history of the seed's continuing life. Even then the story remains unfinished. The tree flowers, bears fruit, shelters life, returns nourishment to the earth, and gives rise to new generations of mustard trees that become an ecosystem, and becomes part of a climate zone. Becoming becomes again and again and again. Becoming is ceaseless. This means that every embodiment therefore becomes the beginning of further becoming cycles rather than its conclusion.

Perhaps this is why reality appears both remarkably stable and endlessly creative. Stability is not the absence of becoming.

It is becoming that has learned how to endure.


II. Endlessly Formative Cycles of Becoming

Every embodiment becomes
the beginning of another history.
- R. E. Slater

Embodiment never ends becoming.
It gives becoming somewhere new to begin.
- R. E. Slater

If embodiment represented the conclusion of becoming, reality would eventually harden into permanence. Every successful achievement would become an endpoint. Every identity would close the possibilities that gave rise to it. Every stable order would gradually resist further transformation. Reality itself would slowly exhaust its own creativity like a dying sun.

Yet this is not the world we inhabit.

Every embodiment simultaneously represents both an achievement and a beginning.

A star embodies billions of years of cosmic history while becoming the birthplace of heavier elements, planetary systems, and future generations of stars. A forest embodies centuries of ecological development while continually generating new habitats, relationships, and evolutionary possibilities. Human cultures preserve inherited traditions while constantly producing new meanings, institutions, technologies, and forms of communal life.

Embodiment therefore never concludes becoming.

It continually redirects it.

Furthermore, every coherent achievement becomes the relational foundation from which additional histories unfold.

Reality is therefore neither a collection of isolated substances nor an endless succession of disconnected events. It is an unfolding history of histories. Each embodiment gathers together previous relations into a coherent present while simultaneously opening new possibilities for future relations.

The familiar metaphor of the mustard seed beautifully illustrates this generative pattern. The seed does not merely disappear into the tree. Rather, the tree becomes the embodied continuation of the seed's own history. Yet the tree itself immediately enters new histories. It flowers. It bears fruit. It shelters birds. It nourishes the soil. It scatters new seeds. Each achievement becomes the beginning of further achievements. Consequently, becoming does not move toward completion so much as toward continually richer participation within reality itself.

This movement may be understood as an endlessly formative histories or (spiraling) cycles of becoming. Every embodiment preserves something of what came before while opening possibilities that did not previously exist. Reality therefore grows not simply by repeating itself but by continually enriching itself through successive achievements of relation, coherence, and embodiment.

Perhaps this is why novelty remains possible. Every embodied reality enlarges the world available to future becoming. The universe does not merely continue. It accumulates. Not simply in quantity. But in depth. Not merely in complexity. But in relational richness. Reality therefore advances not by abandoning its past but by embodying it in ever more expansive histories of becoming. This is known as the creative advance into novelty, to coin a phrase from Whitehead.

III. Embodiment Makes History Possible

Being is not the opposite of becoming.
Being is becoming that has learned how to endure.
- R. E. Slater

Every embodied reality carries a history.
Every history becomes the beginning of another.
- R. E. Slater

If becoming continually achieved embodiment without preserving anything of what had come before, reality would forever begin again and again and again. Every new occasion would stand isolated from every previous occasion. Nothing could accumulate. Nothing could endure. Nothing could be remembered. Identity, culture, evolution, and consciousness would remain impossible.

Reality, however, unfolds differently.

Every embodiment gathers together the relational achievements through which it emerged and carries them forward into new histories of becoming. In this sense, embodiment is not simply the realization of becoming; it is also reality's capacity to preserve, inherit, and extend its own creative achievements.

History therefore becomes one of embodiment's greatest accomplishments.

Not history merely as chronology.

Nor history merely as memory.

But history as accumulated becoming.

A mountain embodies the history of geological forces extending across immense spans of time. A river embodies the continuing history of water, gravity, and landscape. Every living organism carries within itself billions of years of evolutionary achievement. Languages preserve centuries of human imagination. Cultures embody inherited wisdom while continually creating new possibilities for those who follow.

Nothing begins from nothing.

Everything begins within histories already unfolding.

This perspective also transforms our understanding of novelty. Novelty is rarely the appearance of something entirely disconnected from what preceded it. Rather, novelty represents the creative reorganization of accumulated histories into new forms of coherence and embodiment.

Reality therefore advances neither by abandoning its past nor by repeating it.

It advances by embodying it.

Every new embodiment preserves something. Every new embodiment transforms something. Every new embodiment contributes something. The history of reality thus becomes an endlessly formative history of relational becoming in which each achievement enlarges the possibilities available to future achievements.

Embodiment therefore does more than make being possible.

It makes inheritance possible.

It makes memory possible.

It makes identity possible.

It makes meaning possible.

It makes living systems and civilizations possible.

Ultimately, it makes participation possible.

For participation is never participation in an empty universe. It is participation in a universe that remembers.


IV. Embodiment Opens Participation

Every embodiment becomes an invitation to participate.
- R. E. Slater

Embodiment is never an achievement existing solely for itself. Every coherent reality that acquires enduring presence immediately enters into relationships extending beyond itself. Nothing remains merely what it has become. Every embodiment participates in larger histories, broader communities, and deeper patterns of relational becoming.

Participation therefore should not be understood as something added to embodiment.

It is the natural consequence of embodiment.

A star participates in the continuing evolution of galaxies through the elements it creates. Rivers participate in shaping landscapes. Forests participate in sustaining climates and ecosystems. Human persons participate in families, cultures, languages, communities, and civilizations. Every embodied reality both inherits relationships and contributes new possibilities to those relationships.

Reality therefore exhibits a remarkable generosity.

Every achievement becomes a gift to what follows.

Nothing embodies itself alone.

Nothing persists for itself alone.

Every embodiment enlarges the possibilities available to future embodiments.

Participation thus reveals the fundamentally relational character of being itself. To exist is already to participate. Every identity arises through relationships inherited from the past while continually contributing to relationships that have not yet fully emerged. Reality therefore becomes neither a collection of isolated entities nor an undifferentiated whole. It is a living community of embodied histories continually enriching one another through participation.

This insight also transforms how we understand meaning. Meaning is not something privately possessed by isolated beings. Meaning arises through participation in realities larger than ourselves. Knowledge grows through participation in communities of inquiry. Love grows through participation in relationships of mutual care. Cultures grow through participation across generations. Even nature itself continually participates in the larger unfolding creativity of the universe.

Embodiment therefore reaches its fulfillment not in isolation but in communion.

Every embodiment carries a history.

Every history invites participation.

Every participation contributes to further becoming.

In this way, reality continually deepens itself. What begins as relation becomes embodied life; embodied life becomes shared history; shared history becomes participation; and participation continually opens new possibilities for relation once again.

The movement is never complete.

It is an endlessly formative adventure of relational becoming in which every achievement becomes the beginning of another.


V. Embodiment Makes Reality Generatively Habitable

Reality does not merely exist.
It continually becomes a world within which life may dwell.
- R. E. Slater

Embodiment ultimately discloses something remarkable about the character of reality itself. The universe does not merely generate isolated events, nor does it simply accumulate increasing complexity. Through relation, becoming, coherence, and embodiment, reality continually fashions a world capable of sustaining further histories, richer participation, and deeper possibilities for life.

Reality, in this sense, becomes increasingly habitable.

Habitability should not be understood merely in biological terms. It extends far beyond the conditions necessary for organisms to survive. A habitable reality is one capable of sustaining memory, identity, relationship, meaning, creativity, culture, and hope. It is a world in which histories accumulate rather than disappear, where achievements are preserved rather than erased, and where every new embodiment enlarges the possibilities available to future generations of becoming.

This perspective also reshapes how we understand emergence. Emergence is not simply the appearance of greater complexity. It is the gradual formation of increasingly hospitable realities capable of supporting ever richer forms of participation. Stars make planets possible. Planets make life possible. Life makes consciousness possible. Consciousness makes culture possible. Culture makes ethical communities possible. Every achievement becomes the embodied foundation upon which new achievements may arise.

The universe therefore appears not merely creative but profoundly cumulative.

Its history is neither accidental repetition nor predetermined design.

It is an open history of relational achievements continually giving rise to new opportunities for embodiment and participation.

This does not imply inevitability. For reality also knows interruption. Failure. Extinction. Collapse. Where entire histories of living systems can disappear. Civilizations are forgotten. Species vanish. And stars exhaust themselves.

Yet even these interruptions become part of larger histories through which reality continually reorganizes itself from processual-relational event to processual-relational event. The openness of becoming includes both triumph and tragedy, both flourishing and failure. Precisely because the future remains genuinely open, every achievement remains precious.

Perhaps this is why embodiment occupies such an important place within an open relational metaphysics. Embodiment does not promise permanence. It makes possibility durable. It gives becoming somewhere to live. In doing so, reality continually creates a world capable of receiving its own future. 

The achievement of being, therefore, is never the conclusion of becoming.

It is reality's continuing gift to itself.


VI. The Achievement of Being

Being is reality remembering itself
while remaining open to becoming.
- R. E. Slater

The achievement of being is never possession.
It is participation within an unfinished reality.
- R. E. Slater

The title of this essay, The Embodiment of Becoming, has spoken quietly throughout every preceding section. Only now can its full meaning be appreciated. The achievement of being is not the attainment of permanence. Nor is it the escape from becoming. Rather, being names those embodied achievements through which reality preserves its histories while continually remaining open to new possibilities.

Being therefore should never be understood as something standing outside process. It is one of process's greatest accomplishments. Every enduring reality represents relation that has become coherent, coherence that has become embodied, embodiment that has become historical, history that has become participatory, and participation that continually gives rise to further becoming.

Being is therefore never isolated.

It is relational.

Never finished.

It is generative.

Never merely present.

It carries its past while opening its future.

Reality thus appears neither as a universe of static substances nor as an endless stream of disconnected events. It is a living community of embodied histories whose achievements continually nourish one another across every scale of existence. Every mountain, every forest, every civilization, every person, and every act of compassion becomes part of the world's ongoing inheritance.

This, perhaps, is the deepest contribution of an open relational process metaphysics.

Reality is not simply becoming.

Reality continually achieves being.

And being continually enriches becoming.

The two belong together.


Conclusion: Returning to Reality

We have gone full circle:

Reality first invited us to observe.

Relation taught us that nothing exists entirely alone.

Becoming taught us that reality is generative.

Embodiment taught us that becoming achieves enduring presence.

History taught us that every achievement becomes an inheritance.

Participation taught us that no embodiment exists for itself alone.

Being taught us that reality continually remembers without ceasing to become.

The journey has therefore returned us to where it first began.

Reality.

Yet we no longer encounter it as we once did. We now recognize a universe that is relational before it is isolated, generative before it is static, embodied before it is abstract, historical before it is instantaneous, participatory before it is solitary, and forever open before it is complete.

Reality remains unfinished.

Not because it lacks coherence. But because its coherence continually gives rise to richer possibilities for becoming. Perhaps this is the deepest meaning of embodiment. Reality does not merely become. Reality continually becomes capable of becoming more. And perhaps that is the greatest achievement of being.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Classical Foundations

Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 1999.

Heraclitus. Fragments. Translated by Brooks Haxton. New York: Viking, 2001.

Parmenides. The Fragments of Parmenides. Translated by A. H. Coxon. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2009.

Plato. Timaeus. Translated by Donald J. Zeyl. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2000.

Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967.

———. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968.

———. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected ed. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.


Process Philosophy and Metaphysics

Cobb, John B., Jr. A Christian Natural Theology. 2nd ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.

Griffin, David Ray. Reenchantment without Supernaturalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.

Hartshorne, Charles. Reality as Social Process. New York: Hafner Publishing, 1953.

Mesle, C. Robert. Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2008.

Oord, Thomas Jay. The Death of Omnipotence and Birth of Amipotence. Grasmere, ID: SacraSage Press, 2023.

Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.

Segall, Matthew David. Physics of the World-Soul. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2021.


Emergence, Complexity, and Living Systems

Capra, Fritjof, and Pier Luigi Luisi. The Systems View of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Holland, John H. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Perseus Books, 1998.

Kauffman, Stuart A. At Home in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Laland, Kevin N. Darwin's Unfinished Symphony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.

Laland, Kevin N., Tobias Uller, Marcus W. Feldman, Kim Sterelny, Gerd B. Müller, Armin Moczek, Eva Jablonka, et al. "The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions." Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282, no. 1813 (2015).

Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Morin, Edgar. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008.

Noble, Denis. Dance to the Tune of Life: Biological Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.


Ontology, Meaning, and Human Becoming

Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944.

Frankl, Viktor E. Man's Search for Meaning. Boston: Beacon Press, 2006.

Heschel, Abraham Joshua. God in Search of Man. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1955.

Maritain, Jacques. The Degrees of Knowledge. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.

Nurse, Paul. What Is Life? Five Great Ideas in Biology. New York: W. W. Norton, 2020.

Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.


Hermeneutics and Interpretation

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Continuum, 1989.

Ricœur, Paul. Interpretation Theory. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.


Reference Works

Craig, Edward, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman.


Companion Essays

Slater, R. E.

———. Reality and Cosmology Series (Embodied Process Realism).

———. Reality and Metaphysics Series (Open Relational Process Metaphysics of Becoming).


Overview of Essays 13-16
  • Essay 13 leans toward relation (Whitehead, Hartshorne, Rescher, systems theory).
  • Essay 14 leans toward becoming (process, emergence, complexity, evolution).
  • Essay 15 leans toward embodiment and history (biology, meaning, inheritance, human becoming).
  • Essay 16 leans toward methodology (ontology, metaphysics, interpretation, philosophical method).

The bibliographies are no longer just supporting references - they quietly narrate the intellectual journey of the series. They are quietly tracing the same progression that has been developing within the series: from relation, to becoming, to embodiment, and finally to a disciplined philosophical method granting coherence and unity to their voice.



Friday, July 10, 2026

The Dynamics of Becoming (14)



ESSAY FOURTEEN
III. The Philosophy of Reality

Reality → Ontology → Metaphysics → Interpretation → Ethics → Participation

The Dynamics of Becoming

Metaphysics XIV – Why Reality Is Fundamentally Generative

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT


We begin by observing reality.
We learn to name what we see.
We learn how those names belong together.
We begin to understand their meaning.
We discover our place within the whole.
We answer reality with our lives.
And in that response,
philosophy becomes participation.
- R.E. Slater


Essay Outline
Preface
I. Becoming Is More Than Change - It Is Generative.
II. Why Reality Is Generative
III. Becoming Forms Coherence
IV. Becoming Opens the Future
V. Becoming and the Adventure of Reality
Conclusion: The Grammar of Becoming
Bibliography


Preface

The previous essay proposed that relation belongs to the very constitution of reality. Rather than understanding relationships as secondary connections between already complete things, we considered the possibility that relation itself is one of the primary conditions through which enduring realities continually emerge. This marked an important turning point in our exploration of an open relational process metaphysics.

Yet relation alone does not explain reality.

Relations are never static. They continually give rise to new possibilities, new organizations, new histories, and new forms of existence. Reality is not merely relational; it is generative. It continually becomes.

This insight has long stood at the heart of process philosophy. Alfred North Whitehead recognized that reality is not fundamentally composed of fixed substances but of dynamic acts of becoming. His philosophy challenged centuries of metaphysical thought by placing creativity, process, and the continual emergence of novelty at the center of philosophical reflection. Nearly a century later, these insights continue to shape contemporary conversations concerning emergence, ecology, complexity, systems thinking, and the relational character of existence itself.

The present essay continues that conversation. Rather than treating becoming as merely another word for change, we shall ask whether becoming names one of reality's most fundamental activities. Change describes differences between one state and another. Becoming asks how new realities come into existence at all. It is therefore not simply movement within reality; it is one of the ways reality continually generates itself.

This question also brings the present metaphysical investigation into closer dialogue with the earlier ontological work of Embodied Process Realism (EPR). There we described the recurring structures through which reality appears to organize itself. Here we ask what generative dynamics continually give rise to those structures. Ontology provided the vocabulary. Metaphysics now seeks the grammar.

The journey therefore continues. Having considered why relation comes first, we now turn to becoming itself - not merely as an event within reality, but as one of the primary ways reality continually unfolds into ever richer forms of coherence, embodiment, and participation.


I. Becoming Is More Than Change - It Is Generative.

Reality is not made of becoming.
Reality happens by becoming.
- R. E. Slater

Few ideas have shaped process philosophy more profoundly than becoming. Yet the word itself often suffers from misunderstanding. In ordinary conversation, becoming is frequently treated as little more than another word for change. Things change. Seasons change. People change. Civilizations change. If becoming means only that reality is continually changing, then it contributes little beyond what common experience already tells us.

A process-relational metaphysics proposes something far more fundamental.

Change presupposes that something already exists which subsequently becomes different. Becoming asks a prior question. How do new realities emerge at all? How do galaxies arise from expanding matter? How do organisms emerge from living cells? How do languages, cultures, ecosystems, friendships, and communities come into existence? Becoming concerns not merely alteration within reality but the continual emergence of reality itself.

This distinction is subtle but profound. Change describes differences between one state and another. Becoming describes the generative activity through which new forms of existence arise, stabilize, and enter into further histories of relation. Reality is therefore not simply a world in motion. It is a world continually coming into being.

Everywhere we look, reality bears witness to this generative character. Stars are born, mature, and eventually transform into new cosmic structures. Living organisms continually develop through growth, adaptation, and reproduction. Ecosystems reorganize themselves in response to changing conditions. Languages evolve through countless acts of human communication. Cultures inherit traditions while simultaneously creating new possibilities. Even our own identities emerge through histories of relationship, memory, and experience that remain forever unfinished.

Becoming therefore reaches across every scale of existence. It is as evident within cosmology as within biology, as present in ecological systems as in human societies, and as active in personal growth as in the evolution of civilizations. Reality does not merely contain processes of becoming. It continually expresses itself through processes of becoming.

To observe becoming is therefore to observe one of reality's most universal characteristics. Nothing simply remains what it has been. Nothing remains the same. Nor does reality dissolve into meaningless flux. Becoming continually gives rise to new forms of coherence through which enduring worlds emerge, participate, and themselves become the conditions for further becoming.

The question is therefore no longer whether becoming occurs. It is whether becoming belongs to the very grammar of reality itself.


II. Why Reality Is Generative

Process is not an aspect of reality;
it is the very mode of its existence.
- Nicholas Rescher

If becoming is more than change, then reality cannot be understood as a world that occasionally produces novelty while otherwise remaining fundamentally static. Rather, novelty belongs to the ordinary manner in which reality continually unfolds. The universe does not simply preserve what already exists. It continually generates new forms of relation, organization, and possibility.

This generative character appears across every scale of existence. Cosmology reveals an expanding universe in which stars, galaxies, and planetary systems emerge through long histories of transformation. Biology discloses life continually adapting, diversifying, and discovering new ecological possibilities. Human cultures generate languages, institutions, technologies, works of art, and moral traditions that could not have been predicted from earlier stages alone. Everywhere reality exhibits a remarkable capacity for producing genuine novelty without abandoning continuity.

A process-relational metaphysics therefore understands becoming not as random change but as the continual generation of new possibilities through relation. Relations do not merely preserve existing realities. They create the conditions from which previously unrealized forms may emerge. Most possibilities remain unrealized. Others briefly appear before dissolving. A few achieve sufficient coherence to endure, entering history as relatively stable embodiments capable of further participation.

This understanding helps distinguish becoming from simple succession. Time alone does not explain becoming. Events may follow one another endlessly without generating anything genuinely new. Becoming, by contrast, forms the creative emergence of realities that enrich the possibilities available to the future. The history of the universe therefore becomes more than a sequence of moments. It becomes a continually unfolding adventure of relational creativity.

Here the insights of Alfred North Whitehead remain profoundly significant. Whitehead described reality as the creative advance into novelty, emphasizing that actuality is never merely repeated but continually renewed. An open relational process metaphysics gladly receives this insight while expressing it within a contemporary relational grammar. Becoming is the activity through which relations continually generate new possibilities, some of which achieve coherence, stabilize into embodiment, and contribute to the future as enduring participants within reality's ongoing history.

Reality is therefore not generative because an external force periodically interrupts its ordinary course. Reality is generative because relational becoming belongs to its ordinary course. Novelty is not an exception to reality. It is one of reality's most characteristic expressions.


III. Becoming Forms Coherence

Coherence is not the absence of change.
It is the achievement of relation.
- R.E. Slater

What endures is not what refuses to change,
but what continually renews itself through relation.
- R.E. Slater

Having established that
  • Relation is primary (essay 13).
  • Relation generates becoming (section I).
  • Becoming forms new realities (section II).
we must next ask, "How do new realities endure?"

If becoming continually forms new realities, another question immediately arises. Why do some newly emerging possibilities endure while countless others disappear almost as quickly as they arise? Reality continually generates novelty, yet only a comparatively small number of these novelties become sufficiently integrated to shape the ongoing history of the universe.

The answer appears to lie in the emergence of coherence.

Becoming alone does not guarantee persistence. Most relational possibilities remain unrealized. Others emerge only briefly before dissolving into new relational configurations. Coherence marks the gradual integration of relational activity into patterns capable of sustaining themselves through time. It is therefore neither separate from becoming nor opposed to it. Rather, coherence is one of becoming's most remarkable achievements.

This understanding helps explain why reality exhibits both extraordinary creativity and remarkable stability. Novelty continually appears, yet the universe does not collapse into disorder. Instead, many new relational patterns gradually organize themselves into increasingly coherent forms. Galaxies emerge from gravitational interaction. Living organisms arise through astonishingly coordinated biological processes. Ecosystems stabilize through networks of reciprocal dependence. Human communities discover shared languages, traditions, and institutions capable of enduring across generations.

Coherence therefore represents neither permanence nor finality. Every coherent reality remains historically situated and continually open to further becoming. Stability itself becomes dynamic rather than static. Enduring realities persist not because they cease changing but because their relational organization continually renews itself through ongoing participation in reality's unfolding history.

An open relational process metaphysics therefore understands coherence as the bridge between becoming and embodiment.
  • Becoming forms new possibilities.
  • Coherence gradually integrates those possibilities into stable relational organizations.
  • Embodiment marks the historical achievement of that coherence within the continuing adventure of reality.
The movement may therefore be expressed as:

Relation → Becoming → Coherence → Embodiment

Each movement naturally gives rise to the next. Relation generates becoming. Becoming forms coherence. Coherence stabilizes into embodiment. Embodiment opens new possibilities for further relation.

Reality thus continually renews itself through a generative movement in which every achievement becomes the beginning of further becoming.

IV. Becoming Opens the Future

Reality is not finished.
Every moment inherits a world and contributes a new world.
- R. E. Slater

If becoming continually forms coherence, then reality can no longer be understood as the gradual unfolding of a predetermined plan. Every coherent achievement contributes to the future without completely determining it. The history of reality therefore remains genuinely open, continually shaped by new relations, emerging possibilities, and the creative interactions of countless participants.

This openness should not be confused with randomness. An open future is not a future without structure. Every new becoming inherits the achievements, constraints, and possibilities formed by the histories that precede it. Reality remembers. Every embodiment carries forward the relational accomplishments from which it arose. Yet inheritance never eliminates novelty. Every new relation creates opportunities that did not previously exist in precisely the same way.

Here the universe reveals one of its most remarkable characteristics. Stability and creativity continually cooperate rather than compete. Stable worlds provide the conditions within which new possibilities may emerge, while new possibilities continually reshape the worlds from which they arise. Reality therefore advances neither through rigid determinism nor through unrestricted chaos, but through the ongoing interplay of continuity and novelty.

Contemporary science increasingly recognizes this dynamic. Cosmology describes an evolving universe rather than a finished one. Evolutionary biology understands life as an ongoing history of adaptation, innovation, and ecological interaction. The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis emphasizes reciprocal causation, developmental plasticity, niche construction, and the continual participation of organisms in shaping the environments that subsequently shape them. Complexity theory likewise demonstrates how new levels of organization emerge from relational interactions that cannot be fully predicted from their individual components alone.

These scientific developments do not prove an open relational metaphysics. They do, however, resonate remarkably well with one. Together they suggest a universe whose history is neither mechanically predetermined nor merely accidental, but continually enriched through relational becoming.

Reality may therefore be understood not as a universe completely completed at its beginning, but as one continually achieving greater coherence through its own unfolding history of relational becoming. The remarkable order we observe throughout the cosmos need not be interpreted solely as the consequence of fixed initial conditions (fine tuning arguments). Rather, it may reflect reality's ongoing capacity to discover, stabilize, and embody increasingly coherent forms of organization across its evolutionary history.

Within this metaphysical grammar, openness is therefore not an exception to reality. It is one of reality's defining characteristics. Every coherent embodiment inherits a past while simultaneously enlarging the horizon of possible futures. The future remains genuinely unfinished because reality itself continually generates possibilities through relation, becoming, coherence, and embodiment.

Reality does not simply move through time.

Reality continually creates evolving history.


V. Becoming and the Adventure of Reality

Reality does not merely continue.
It continually becomes more than it has been.
- R. E. Slater

If becoming belongs to the very grammar of reality, then existence can no longer be understood as the repetition of an already completed world. Reality continually inherits its past while simultaneously opening possibilities that did not previously exist in precisely the same form. Every moment therefore stands at the meeting place of memory and novelty, continuity and emergence, inheritance and creation.

This understanding transforms the way we think about history itself. History is not merely a chronological record of events. It is the accumulated achievement of countless moments of relational becoming. Every enduring reality carries within itself the histories that made it possible while simultaneously contributing something genuinely new to the realities that follow.

The universe may therefore be understood as a continuing adventure of relational achievement. Galaxies embody histories of gravitational coherence. Ecosystems embody histories of biological adaptation. Human societies embody histories of language, culture, imagination, and moral development. Even philosophy participates in this unfolding adventure, continually refining its understanding as reality discloses new dimensions of itself.

The history of reality is not merely the preservation of what has endured. It is equally the continual discovery of new forms of coherence through which reality becomes capable of achievements that were once only possibilities.

Within this perspective, failure of becoming assumes a new significance. Not every relational possibility achieves coherence. Countless pathways remain unrealized. Others emerge only briefly before dissolving into new configurations of relation and becoming. Such failures should not be understood merely as defects within reality but as part of the openness through which new possibilities continually arise. A universe capable of genuine novelty must also remain capable of incompletion.

This insight resonates remarkably well with contemporary understandings of emergence, complexity, and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis. Evolution does not proceed through uninterrupted success. Rather, the history of life reveals continual experimentation, adaptation, extinction, renewal, and increasingly sophisticated forms of relational organization. The remarkable coherence we observe throughout the living world appears not as the inevitable consequence of fixed beginnings but as the historical achievement of countless generations of attempted, but failed, relational becoming.

An open relational process metaphysics therefore understands becoming as more than perpetual motion. Becoming forms histories. Those histories generate coherence. Coherence stabilizes into embodiment. Embodied realities become participants within an unfinished universe whose future remains genuinely open to further creativity, deeper relation, and new possibilities yet unrealized.

Reality therefore does not simply move forward.

It continually becomes.


Conclusion: The Grammar of Becoming

This essay has proposed that becoming is more than change. It is the continual generative activity through which reality forms new possibilities, discovers new coherence, and gives rise to new embodiments that themselves participate in the ongoing history of the universe.

This understanding also brings the present metaphysical investigation into closer dialogue with the earlier ontological work of Embodied Process Realism (EPR). Ontology described the recurring patterns through which reality appears to organize itself. Metaphysics has now begun exploring the generative dynamics through which those patterns continually emerge.

Together they suggest a common grammar:

Relation → Becoming → Coherence → Embodiment → Participation

Each movement prepares the next.

Relation generates becoming.

Becoming forms coherence.

Coherence stabilizes into embodiment.

Embodiment opens new possibilities for participation and further relation.

Reality therefore appears neither as a collection of isolated substances nor as perpetual, undifferentiated flux. It continually forms enduring realities through histories of relational becoming whose achievements remain open to further transformation.

This grammar does not conclude our inquiry. It opens it. The next essay therefore turns to embodiment itself. For if becoming continually forms coherent realities, we must now ask how those achievements acquire persistence, identity, and historical presence within an unfinished universe.

Reality is not made of becoming.

Reality happens by becoming.

And through that becoming, reality continually becomes more than it has been.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Classical Foundations

Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 1999.

Heraclitus. Fragments. Translated by Brooks Haxton. New York: Viking, 2001.

Plato. Timaeus. Translated by Donald J. Zeyl. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2000.

Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967.

———. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968.

———. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected ed. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.


Process Philosophy

Cobb, John B., Jr. A Christian Natural Theology. 2nd ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.

Griffin, David Ray. Reenchantment without Supernaturalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.

Hartshorne, Charles. Reality as Social Process. New York: Hafner Publishing, 1953.

Oord, Thomas Jay. The Death of Omnipotence and Birth of Amipotence. Grasmere, ID: SacraSage Press, 2023.

Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.


Emergence, Complexity, and Systems

Capra, Fritjof, and Pier Luigi Luisi. The Systems View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Holland, John H. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Perseus Books, 1998.

Kauffman, Stuart A. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Meadows, Donella H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.

Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Morin, Edgar. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008.

Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.


Evolutionary Theory and Biology

Jablonka, Eva, and Marion J. Lamb. Evolution in Four Dimensions. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.

Laland, Kevin N. Darwin's Unfinished Symphony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.

Laland, Kevin N., Tobias Uller, Marcus W. Feldman, Kim Sterelny, Gerd B. Müller, Armin Moczek, Eva Jablonka, et al. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282, no. 1813 (2015).

Noble, Denis. Dance to the Tune of Life: Biological Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Nurse, Paul. What Is Life? Five Great Ideas in Biology. New York: W. W. Norton, 2020.


Eastern Perspectives on Becoming

Laozi. Dao De Jing. Translated by Roger T. Ames and David L. Hall. New York: Ballantine Books, 2003.

Nāgārjuna. The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way (Mūlamadhyamakakārikā). Translated by Jay L. Garfield. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

The Principal Upanishads. Translated by S. Radhakrishnan. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books, 1992.


Reference Works

Craig, Edward, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998.

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman.