Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Stories that Shape Dark Realities (1)



Essay One

Stories that Shape Dark Realities

When Stories Shape Our Lives
and Communities Become Prisons

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT


We are, as a species, addicted to story.
- The Wonder

The lies we tell ourselves
do not set us free.
They become cages.
- R.E. Slater

Stories shape worlds.
Some teach us how to live.
Others teach us how to die.
Wisdom begins in learning the difference.
- R.E. Slater

Reality is never threatened by truth.
It is false stories that fear becoming.
- R.E. Slater

Reality will always become. It is Generative.
Yet it is human beings who possess the
tragic capacity to refuse becoming.
- R.E. Slater


Prelude Essay - The questions
11 Questions I Had When Watching the film, "The Wonder"
Assessment and Analysis of the Film

Essay 1 - The diagnosis
Stories that Shape Dark Realities
Spiritual Abuse, Collective Delusion, and the Stories That Harm

Essay 2 - The Philosophy
Reality, Narrative, and Becoming
Ontological Reflections on Human Transformation

Essay 3 - The Synthesis
Narrative Before Theology
Why Human Beings Cannot Live Without Stories

Essay 4 - Supplemental Appendix
Additional Stories of Becoming in Film
A Reader's Guide to Films of Trauma, Hope, and Human Transformation



After several days of rugged travel across 1800's Ireland, we come to an old thatched cottage to find within a nine-year-old girl starving herself to death. Not because she has no food. Nor because she wishes to die. Nor because she is suffering from mental illness. But a frail child, tenderly cradling a figure of the Madonna, believes quite sincerely, and wholeheartedly, she is saving her brother from the paining torments of purgatory by her singular act of contrition. That upon her willing death her brother might be released from torment and be saved.

This unselfish act of starvation by Anna seems to satisfy her family who participate with her in this grim story of severe mercy. They call her choice holy - though to the outsider such supportive acts of unnaturalness feel complicit in the child's slow, wasting murder. For it must be asked, "What reason have child and family formed ranks embracing the unholy death of a beloved family member to atone for sins of the dead? We are not told. Not yet. The lens of investigation must widen across a landscape of inhabited stories if we are to discover the secret.

For there are also other participants in Anna's persistence penance for the dead. It begins with her church's story that supports her determination to die believing she is a living miracle sustained by God having lasted several months without diminishing consequences. And then there is the nearby village which sees Anna's faith, the family's faithfulness, the supporting church's inspiration, and believes God to be at work in an innocent's life as it too prays daily for her soul while visiting frequently.

There is also a medical-health committee of sorts which daily gathers to observe the child's wasting condition through the daily visitation of the village doctor as well as providing daily ministrations to the child's family through an appointed nun. Each day a physician records her health without any further interference. A priest listens to her prayers of contrition. A nun solemnly holds vigil beside Anna's bedside. Neighbors across the far flung Central Lowlands whisper in reverence of a living miracle in their midst. And high-minded pilgrims travel miles  and miles in hopes of witness God's extraordinary act of faithful perseverance.

Into their midst, a stranger has come, one trained to look and see what others refuse to look or see. This stranger, this human medicant, is the only person that thinks to ask the most obvious question -

"What if everyone is wrong?"

It is this question that lies at the heart of The Wonder (2022), starring actress Florence Pugh. At first glance the film appears to be a historical religious mystery set into the backwaters of  post-famine Ireland. Yet as the story unfolds, it becomes something far more unsettling. Far more troubling. It asks how ordinary, decent, religious people can participate in extraordinary cruelty while believing they are doing what is right.

The tragedy is not that one child believes a destructive story.

The tragedy is that every adult around her had believed it first.

Into this story the film watcher is thrust then asked what brought all these participants into Anna's story and why? Why does Anna chose to starve herself? Why does her family allow it? Why does their church and community revere it? These are the questions we will later learn throughout the length of the film, even up to its end.

---

Because of these uneasy questions the film moves beyond historical drama and into something resembling more like a modern day parable. It is no longer simply a story about nineteenth-century Ireland. It is about every family, every church, every ideology, and every community that becomes so committed to its own narrative that it can no longer recognize the suffering standing before its eyes. Even the troubling suffering of a little child not even ten yet.

History repeatedly reminds us that this is not an isolated phenomenon. Human beings have justified child abuse, slavery, persecution, war, racial and cultural oppression, discrimination, and countless other heartless injustices through distorted stories promising righteousness while producing cruelty and suffering. The particulars differ - but the evidential patterns remain remarkably familiar.

Throughout history, the stories we either tell ourselves - or have grown up within - become indispensable to  our lives, our families, our churches, communities, and nation. They preserve memory, transmit values, cultivate identity, and inspire hope. Without them, civilizations could scarcely exist.

Yet stories possess another, more dangerous power. They can become closed worlds. They can become prisons. Their unnatural story can become realities far more compelling than reality itself. When that happens, compassion slowly yields to partial truths which harden into unquestioning beliefs. Resulting questions then become threats. Doubts become betrayal. And the protection of an unnatural story that is being harmfully lived becomes far more important than the protection of a child, an adult, a disabled, an unwanted, or the unheard.

The Wonder is not so simply a film about religious extremism.

It is more a film about ourselves. Of the myths and narratives we live within.

More so, it becomes a very difficult film to watch when recognizing the agony writhing beneath an innocent's circumstances having brainwashed a nine-year-old child who has become helplessly trapped within the psychological-religious webs of sacrificial penance, personal accusation, judgment, guilt, and need for cleansing.

This agony is not limited to one cottage, one village, or even one century. It can emerge anywhere - from a simple farming community to an urban neighborhood, from isolated villages to religious sects and ideological movements. It arises wherever inherited stories, cultural traditions, and survival instincts, become more powerful than compassion itself.



The Wonder
Official Trailer  |  Oct 4, 2022

Starring Florence Pugh and based on the book by Emma Donoghue, writer of Room. The Wonder is the tale of a young Irish girl, Anna O'Donnell, whose Catholic family claim she has eaten nothing since her eleventh birthday... four months ago.

The Child Who Bears the Sins of Others

Anna O'Donnell is nine years old.

She is not starving because food is unavailable. She is not refusing nourishment because she wishes to die. She fasts because she believes her suffering serves a higher purpose beyond herself. In her young understanding of the world, she has taken upon herself a burden that does not belong to her: the spiritual fate of her deceased brother.

Anna believes she is saving him from the torments of purgatory.

To those around her, this is not simply a child refusing food. It is an act of devotion. Her hunger becomes a sign of faithfulness. Her weakness becomes evidence of spiritual strength. Her suffering becomes a sacrifice offered out of love.

Yet beneath this extraordinary belief lies a heartbreaking reality: a child has accepted responsibility for the actions, choices, and consequences of another person.

Anna is carrying a burden created before she was old enough to understand it.

This is what makes her story so painful. Children do not create the worlds into which they are born. They inherit the beliefs, fears, hopes, expectations, and wounds of those who raise them. They learn what love means, what duty requires, what guilt feels like, and what sacrifice looks like from the people around them.

For Anna, love has become inseparable from suffering. Duty has become inseparable from self-denial. And salvation has become inseparable from her own disappearance. The question surrounding Anna is not simply why she chooses to fast. The deeper question is how a child came to believe that love requires her to suffer.


A Village Waiting for a Miracle

Anna's suffering does not occur in isolation. Around her gathers an entire community trying to understand what it is witnessing.

A small village in post-famine Ireland becomes captivated by the possibility that something extraordinary is taking place within the walls of a modest cottage. Word spreads that a young girl has survived for months without eating. What begins as concern slowly becomes fascination. What appears medically impossible begins to take on religious meaning.

Anna is no longer simply a child.

She becomes a symbol.

A village doctor is asked to observe her physical condition. A committee gathers to determine whether the reports surrounding her are credible. The church sends a nun to remain at Anna's bedside and witness her daily condition. A priest listens to her prayers and offers spiritual guidance. Neighbors visit with reverence. Outsiders travel to see the girl whose fasting has become a source of wonder.

Each person arrives with their own understanding of what they are seeing.

Some see devotion.

Some see mystery.

Some see a miracle.

Some see a test of faith.

The community does not gather around Anna because they do not care about her. In many ways, the opposite appears true. They are deeply concerned with her. They pray for her. They watch over her. They seek to understand her.

And yet the film slowly reveals a troubling tension. A community can surround someone with attention while still failing to truly see them. Anna is constantly observed, but the question remains whether she is truly understood.

The village has become a witness to something it cannot explain. But as the days pass, another question begins to emerge: When a community believes it is witnessing something sacred, how difficult does it become to question the story forming around it?


When Suffering Becomes Sacred

Anna's fasting is not viewed by those around her as a tragedy.

It is viewed as a testimony.

Within the religious imagination of the village, suffering carries meaning. Sacrifice has always occupied an important place within Christian tradition. Self-denial, repentance, and acts of devotion have long been understood as expressions of faith. Anna's family and neighbors do not see her suffering as meaningless. They see purpose within it.

This is precisely what makes her situation so difficult to comprehend. Anna is not merely refusing food. She is offering something. Her hunger becomes a prayer. Her weakness becomes a witness. Her endurance becomes a sign of spiritual devotion.

The community does not gather around a child they believe is simply wasting away.

They gather around a child they believe has discovered something sacred.

The language surrounding Anna reflects this understanding. She is not described merely as sick. She is viewed as extraordinary. Her suffering is interpreted through the larger stories of sin, forgiveness, sacrifice, and redemption that have shaped the religious life of the community.

Yet the film quietly asks what happens when a sacred story becomes separated from compassion.

What happens when suffering itself becomes evidence of righteousness?

What happens when the endurance of pain becomes more important than the relief of suffering?

The Wonder does not dismiss the human desire to find meaning in suffering. That desire is deeply woven into the human experience. Throughout history, people have searched for purpose amid grief, loss, injustice, and death.

But the film presents a troubling tension. Meaning can comfort. Meaning can sustain. Meaning can also become a burden when it demands that suffering continue. Anna's tragedy is not that she seeks meaning. Her tragedy is that the only meaning available to her requires her disappearance. Her passing. Her death.


The Stories that Compete for Anna's Life

When a London nurse, Lib Wright (Florence Pugh) arrives in the backwater village, she is not welcomed as someone who will uncover a miracle. She is invited as someone who will observe one.

A trained English nurse with experience caring for wounded soldiers, Lib is assigned to watch Anna and determine whether the reports surrounding her extraordinary fast can be explained. She is not there to comfort, rescue, or judge. She is there to witness.

But witnessing proves more complicated than anyone expects.

Lib enters a community that already has an answer. Anna is a miracle. Her fasting is a sign. Her suffering has meaning. The village story is built upon familiar religious themes: sin, sacrifice, redemption, and divine mystery. Within that story, Anna's actions are not irrational. They are understandable. She is a child offering herself for someone she loves.

But Lib sees something different. She sees a child whose body is failing. She sees hunger. She sees suffering. She sees a young girl carrying a burden no child should bear.

Where the village asks, "What does this mean?"

Lib first asks, "What is happening?"

The difference between these questions becomes the central tension of the film.

One story searches for the extraordinary.

The other searches for the human being within the extraordinary.

Yet The Wonder does not present this conflict as a simple battle between faith and science. The film's tension is more complicated than that. Lib carries her own wounds, grief, and assumptions. She is not an outside observer untouched by suffering. She arrives carrying memories of her own losses.

Everyone in the story is interpreting reality through a story they already possess. The villagers have their story of miracle. Lib has her story of survival. Anna has her story of sacrifice. The question is not merely which story will win. The deeper question is whether any story can remain.


The Woman Who Came to Watch

Lib Wright arrives in the village as an outsider. She is English. She is Protestant. She is a trained nurse entering a deeply Catholic Irish community still carrying the wounds of famine, poverty, and historical distrust. Before she ever meets Anna, Lib is already crossing boundaries of culture, religion, and memory.

Yet her assignment is simple. She is not there to intervene. She is there to watch.

The committee overseeing Anna's condition does not ask Lib to rescue the child. It asks her to observe the child. She is one more set of eyes among many - a witness whose role is to record what happens and determine whether anything unusual is occurring spiritually or as divine sustenance of starving body and soul.

But observation is never as neutral as it appears. To watch another person suffer is already a moral encounter. As the days pass, Lib finds herself caught between the role she has been given and the responsibility she begins to feel. The longer she sits with Anna, the harder it becomes to see her as a religious symbol or a medical curiosity. She sees a child.

A child who is suffering. A frightened child. A lonely child. A child whose entire identity has become wrapped around personal sacrifice for another. For a brother who is departed and believed living in purgatory for sins he committed.

Lib's professional training tells her to question what she sees and what she is told. But her human compassion tells her something more. That Anna needs help.

Yet Lib herself also carries her own hidden suffering. Beneath her calm, practical exterior is a woman racked with grief and loss which is on display nightly. Her journey to Ireland is not only a professional assignment. It is also a deep encounter with grieving memories she has yet to face fully.

In this way, The Wonder presents two wounded lives meeting across different forms of suffering.

Anna carries the burden of a story she inherited.

Lib carries the burden of a loss she cannot release.

Neither woman is entering the village whole.

And perhaps that is why they are able to recognize something in one another that the village cannot yet see.


The Witnesses Who Participate in the Story of Abuse

One of the most unsettling elements of The Wonder is that Anna's suffering does not occur in secret. Everyone knows. Everyone is watching and wondering. And everyone has a reason for being part of Anna's story.

The village doctor observes her physical condition. The priest attends to her spiritual life. The nun remains beside her bed. The committee gathers reports. The villagers pray, visit, and wait for miracle to occur. Curious outsiders travel to visit Anna to witness what they believe may be something extraordinary.

No one person creates Anna's suffering.

Which is precisely what makes the situation so difficult to observe.

The film presents a community in which ethical responsibility is owned by all the people within Anna's story. Though each person holds one piece of the story, they each also bear a personal role within it. Whether the community knows it or not, each person is contributing something necessary for Anna's story to continue.

The doctor brings medical observation.

The priest brings spiritual guidance.

The nun brings religious companionship.

The villagers bring faith and concern.

The committee brings order and oversight.

Yet, by surrounding a suffering person with attention does not always mean that person is truly being protected. A person can be watched and still remain unseen. This hidden, sociological tension, gives the film one of its most powerful questions:

What happens when witnessing becomes a substitute for acting?

The people surrounding Anna are not indifferent. They are deeply invested in her. They care about what happens to her. But their understanding of her suffering is shaped by the story they already believe.

For they are not merely observing Anna. They are observing Anna through a particular meaning. A particular faith and religious belief that has come to mean something different for each congregant before the communion table that is Anna.

Her hunger is not seen only as hunger. Her weakness is not seen only as weakness. Her suffering is interpreted through a larger narrative of faith, sacrifice, and redemption. To this, the film invites the viewer to consider the uncomfortable possibility that harm does not always arrive through cruelty or neglect.

Sometimes it arrives through devotion. Sometimes it arrives through waiting. Sometimes it arrives through the belief that someone else must know better and will intervene. And sometimes the hardest thing to do is not seeing what is happening. It is allowing ourselves to see it differently.


The Wounds Beneath the Miracle

Anna's story is not the only story of suffering in The Wonder.

Beneath the village's fascination with a miracle lies a landscape already marked by hunger, grief, loss, and the convinced need for an atoning miracle that removes the stain born by child, family, church, village, and community at large.

Behind these events lies the memory of the Great Famine present in the lives of those who themselves have suffered its cruelty and hardships. Starvation was not merely a historical event. It was a torn and living memory carried by families who have experienced what hunger can take from them.

For Lib, suffering has another face.

She arrives in Ireland carrying a grief she has never fully released. Before she becomes the nurse watching over Anna, she is a woman mourning the loss of her own child. Her quiet dependence on the soul-numbing laudanum and her attachment to her child's small baby shoes preserves a broken person suspended between grievous memory and the inability to move forward as she is.

Lib, then, is surrounded by another kind of hunger.

Not the hunger of the body.

But the starved hunger of a broken heart separated from her child.

Like Anna, she is living inside a story shaped by loss. Anna believes she must sacrifice herself to save another. Lib has allowed her grief to preserve an undying connection to her lost child. Both women are held by memories they cannot yet release.

The film draws a subtle connection between them.

Anna is trapped by her story of personal loss and sacrifice.

Lib is trapped by her own story of personal loss and grief.

Both will discover that remembering does not require remaining imprisoned by the past.

And even more oddly, their stories of deliverance will require each of their own participations together in finding forgiveness and salvation.

This juxtapositional parallel gives The Wonder a deeply emotional dimension. The film is not only asking whether Anna will survive. It is also asking whether those around her can find their own way back into life. And into the further life of God's grace and care.

Healing, the film suggests, does not come through forgetting.

It comes through learning how to carry memory differently.


The Harbor, the Fire, and the Journey Away

From the beginning of The Wonder, the harbor quietly waits in the background. It was part of Lib's story as she walked past the piers from the train to the stagecoach. And it was also where Lib would later return when arriving in a deeply transformation moment in her life.

The ports and harbors where places of crossing bearing uncertainty and transition. She has comes from another world outside the villages' experience, to enter into a rural community that is been profoundly shaped by its own history, wounds, and beliefs. The harbor then marks for Lib the boundary between what was known and what has yet to be discovered. It will later do the same for Anna.

For by the end of the film, that same harbor will carry a different meaning. It will no longer be a place of arrival. It will becomes a place of departure.

Once completed, the journey away from the village will represent more than mere physical movement away. For Anna, it will be leaving behind the only world she has ever known - a world where her identity had been defined by sacrifice, guilt, and obligation. And for Lib, she will be leaving behind her own resolved grief and the memories which had held her captive for too long.

But before that journey could begin, something had to end. Hence, the circumstances leading up Anna's home burning up becomes a very powerful image of death and resurrection for both Lib and Anna. Fire destroys. But fire also transforms.

Within the burning flames were the severe objects and spaces connected to needless suffering. There, in the fire, was the cottage where Anna's beliefs and identity were shaped, the crushed bottle of laudanum that helped Lib endure her grief, and the baby shoes tenderly placed on the burning bed which had preserved for too long the  painful memory of a lost child to God.

The fire did not erase the past.

It released them from living entirely within an unhealthy, dark past.

What remained when leaving this past was not forgetfulness, but possibility.

Anna does not become someone new because her past disappears. Lib does not heal because her grief never existed. Their lives remain marked by what happened. But they are no longer defined only by what happened. The final journey suggests that sometimes transformation requires leaving a place that can no longer sustain life.

That new stories require new surroundings.

That new identities require new companions and relationships.

And that new beginnings require the courage to cross from an old world to a new one.


The Miracle Question

Throughout The Wonder, everyone and no one is searching for a miracle. The village believes it has found one. A young girl survives without food. A child demonstrates extraordinary devotion. A mystery unfolds that seems to reach beyond ordinary explanation. But as the story progresses, the meaning of a miracle becomes less certain.

What exactly is miraculous?

Is it Anna's ability to survive?

Is it a sign of divine intervention?

Is it the strength of human love?

Is it the courage to challenge a community's deepest assumptions?

Or is it something quieter and more human - the possibility that a life defined by suffering can become a life defined by hope?

The film does not provide a simple answer.

Instead, The Wonder leaves the viewer with competing understandings of what redemption might look like.

For the village, redemption is found in a child's sacrifice.

For Lib, redemption begins with protection and compassion.

For Anna, redemption ultimately requires the possibility of becoming someone beyond the personal-religious identity she had told herself to believe.

The film's greatest tension is not between belief and disbelief, faith and science, or religion and reason. It is between stories that preserve life and stories that consume it.

Why?

Because stories matter. They shape how people understand suffering. They shape how communities respond to vulnerability. They shape how individuals understand themselves. A story can offer meaning in the midst of pain. A story can also ask a person to surrender themselves to pain. Perhaps the enduring question of The Wonder is not whether a miracle occurred. Perhaps the question is what kind of miracle we are looking for.

A miracle that confirms what we already believe?

Or a miracle that allows us to see reality, and one another, more clearly?


Closing Reflection

The Wonder is a difficult film to watch because it does not give us an easy enemy. It gives us human beings trapped within the webs of their own stories. People of every kind, color, creed, culture, background, tradition, and heritage, who are shaped by history, faith, grief, love, fear, and the stories they have learned to inherit.

The film asks us to look not only at Anna's family, friends, village, and locality but at ourselves, the ones whom we see facing us in the mirror every day. To look at the kind of stories that shape our lives, our churches and communities, our friends and neighbors.

And when those stories no longer serve life in loving, generative ways -

to ask whether we have the courage to let them go and become other than we are.

To say "No," to stories dark and ugly. And to let them go without regret.

 



Continuing the Conversation

For Further Viewing

If The Wonder raised questions that stayed with you, here are films which will explore many of the same themes from differing perspectives:

  • Women Talking - Abuse, silence, and moral courage within an isolated religious community.
  • Philomena (film) and Philomena (biography)- Faith, institutional failure, memory, forgiveness, and reconciliation.
  • Doubt - Certainty, ambiguity, authority, conscience, and institutional responsibility.
  • The White Ribbon - Childhood, discipline, hidden violence, and the formation of authoritarian communities.
  • Babette's Feast - A hopeful counterpoint exploring grace, generosity, hospitality, and transformation.

For Further Reading

The following essays, interviews, and reviews offer thoughtful perspectives on The Wonder, its historical background and enduring themes.
  • RogerEbert.comThe Wonder review by Brian Tallerico. A perceptive discussion of empathy, moral responsibility, and Florence Pugh's nuanced performance. The Wonder review (RogerEbert.com)
  • The AtlanticStubborn, Determined, and Dying. Sophie Gilbert reflects on The Wonder as a story of faith, self-annihilation, and the cultural spectacle surrounding the "fasting girl." Stubborn, Determined, and Dying (The Atlantic)
  • The New YorkerEmma Donoghue's Art of Starvation. A superb essay on the historical "fasting girls," the novel's origins, and the psychological and religious world that inspired The Wonder

Questions for Reflection

  • What burden was Anna carrying that did not belong to her?
  • At what point does compassion become separated from conviction?
  • Can sincere people unintentionally participate in another person's suffering?
  • When does a community become unable to question the stories that define it?
  • Which character changed the most during the film—and why?
  • What did Lib discover about herself while trying to save Anna?
  • What, in the end, was the true miracle?
  • Which story in the film stayed with you the longest?



11 Questions I Had When Watching the film, "The Wonder"



A Prelude



The Wonder
Official Trailer  |  Oct 4, 2022

Starring Florence Pugh and based on the book by Emma Donoghue, writer of Room. The Wonder is the tale of a young Irish girl, Anna O'Donnell, whose Catholic family claim she has eaten nothing since her eleventh birthday... four months ago.


Prelude

11 Questions I Had When Watching
the film, "The Wonder"

by R.E. Slater


I held a Q&A below with ChatGPT that will lay the groundwork for a short mini-series I hope to create from the observations made here based on the movie, "The Wonder." My overall intention is to stop for a moment from my current philosophical series to share how life and philosophy interact when we construct stories based upon errant belief and presumed reality.

It is because of these all too common human constructions that I urge each of us to tell to ourselves and to our loved ones a different story of God and reality. A story of a God and a reality that is more amazing than we understand. Of a reality that if inspired by God should behave exactly as I have been describing it over these many months in my philosophical studies.

And if there is no God, then of a reality that certainly feels like a loving relational God has been out there forming and moulding reality in generative, hopeful, and renewing movements of healing in rupture, transformance in death, and beauty as aftermath.

Here, I wish to tell stories of brokenness that do not behave according to the God or reality I believe we live within. And when that God and that reality is unperceived, refused, corrupted, or made lesser than it is, we should expect resulting broken realities that become stillborn in the cradle of our lives.

As a Christian... ahem... as a process-relational Christian... I believe our constructed beliefs too often see the world in jagged, fragmented, lesser visions of itself than a loving God had in mind. And by looking at the hard stories found in films like, "The Wonder," those pained stories of enclosure, untruth, unlove, tragedy, and darkness, should behoove us to create better stories than the ones we are often handed, find ourselves living within, or are urged to sustain at great cost to ourselves and to those around us.

I don't believe we should hold onto those miserable worlds of unreality or unGod. But I do believe we should take our own stories and make them truly great though the virtues of love, compassion, kindness, thoughtfulness, honesty, and service to others.

If this is what reality is, then let us start understanding why reality is this way, and learn to lean into it as it is... not as we think it is.

Peace,

R.E. Slater



Question 1


The movie, The Wonder, by Florence Pugh, was intensely psychological. It involved a little nine year old who seemed to be held under the illusion that she could save her old, married brother, returned from the Crimean War, for his sexual concourses with her over a short period before he died prematurely.

In some way or manner the child, named Anna, believed by starving herself to death so could pay for her own sins and well as that of her brothers believed in fiery purgatory. At first, it felt that it was Anna who had devised this scheme of penitence, but as the movie moved forward, it seemed more the quiet persuasion of her family, in league with their church, that her act of death was an atoning sacrifice that would remove her sin, her brothers transgressions to her and of unfaithfulness to his wife, while alleviating the shame and guilt bourne by her family, church, and community at large.

One wonders then what kind of unloving illusion or psychological schema a psychologist might present given a situation where a little girl is urged to die for here brother's sake to release him from his purgatory and, by implication, by her act of contrition, she also can release her family from the shame bourne for her transgression with her brother.

More curious is the fact that the family is quietly allowing Anna to die, having allowed her to believe in her line of reasoning and when saved by the nurse, she rises into a new life. Is this a sustained hallucination? Does the child, Anna, have multiple personalities? What are we witnessing at the end of the story?

Chatbot's Response

The Wonder is deliberately written so that several psychological, religious, and symbolic interpretations might exist at the same time.

From a psychologist's perspective, the girl's beliefs would probably not be treated as evidence that she literally dies and awakens as another person. Instead, they would be understood as the product of several interacting psychological forces:

  • Trauma. Anna has experienced profound sexual abuse by her brother, followed by his death. Children often try to make sense of unbearable experiences by creating meanings that allow them to survive emotionally.
  • Religious indoctrination and guilt. She has absorbed the belief that her brother's soul is in danger because of "sin." As a child, she lacks the developmental ability to separate responsibility from guilt, so she concludes that she must sacrifice herself to save him.
  • Magical thinking. Young children commonly believe their thoughts, actions, or sacrifices can directly affect supernatural outcomes. In Anna's case, fasting becomes a perceived means of redeeming her brother.
  • Dissociation. Under severe trauma, some children psychologically distance themselves from painful reality. This can include imagining a new identity or a new life. It isn't necessarily multiple personalities; rather, it's a protective psychological process.

The ending, where Anna adopts a new name and identity, is especially interesting. A psychologist would likely view this not as literal reincarnation or personality replacement, but as a therapeutic rebirth. She is being given permission to leave behind an identity built around guilt and abuse and begin constructing a healthier self.

At the same time, the film intentionally leaves room for symbolic and theological readings. The "death" of Anna and the "birth" of a new child named "Nan," echoes themes found in many religious traditions:

  • death of the old self,
  • rebirth into a new life,
  • release from guilt,
  • and freedom from oppressive narratives.

One of the most compelling ideas in the film is that stories shape reality. Anna's religious story nearly kills her because it gave meaningful purpose to self-sacrifice vis-a-vis atoning rerightment of the spiritual ledgers according to her family's spiritual beliefs and support by their church. But the nurse, Lib Wright, offers to Anna a different story - not to deceive her maliciously, but to provide an alternative narrative capable of preserving her life. In modern psychology, this resembles narrative therapy, where healing often comes not by denying the past but by helping someone reinterpret it within a healthier, life-giving story.

As an aside: Given the kinds of essays you've been developing on narrative, myth, and transformative imagination, The Wonder is a fascinating case study. It illustrates both sides of mythic imagination: stories can imprison us when they become destructive illusions, yet stories can also liberate us when they open the possibility of a new future. That tension would fit remarkably well alongside your discussions of narrative, symbol, rupture, and becoming in the Reality & Metaphysics series.


Question 2

Perhaps there is a story here about destructive delusion and spiritual abuse committed by religious communities where no one individual is any less guilty then the other.The title? "Little Children Who Bear the Sins of Many."

Chatbot Response

The phrase "The Little Children Shall Bear the Sins of Many" is intentionally provocative. It immediately evokes the inversion of the biblical hope that children should not bear the sins of their parents. That tension is precisely what gives it emotional force.

However, because it echoes Scripture so closely, some readers may initially assume it is a biblical quotation rather than a deliberate reversal. That can work to your advantage if you explain it early in the essay.

A possible subtitle might clarify intent:

  • The Little Children Shall Bear the Sins of Many
    How Religious Communities Can Transfer Guilt, Fear, and Shame to Their Most Vulnerable Members

or

  • The Little Children Shall Bear the Sins of Many
    Spiritual Abuse, Collective Delusion, and the Psychology of Sacred Violence

or

  • The Little Children Shall Bear the Sins of Many
    When Communities Sacrifice Their Children to Preserve Their Beliefs

The essay itself could move through four movements:

  1. A story  - beginning with The Wonder as a modern parable.
  2. The psychology - trauma, indoctrination, magical thinking, dissociation, obedience, and moral injury.
  3. The sociology of religion - how entire communities can reinforce a shared delusion until it feels unquestionably true. No single person is wholly responsible because each reinforces the others.
  4. A constructive conclusion - healthy faith should protect children rather than burden them with adult guilt, fear, or unresolved conflicts.

One thought that especially resonates with your broader work is this: the tragedy is not merely that one child believed a destructive story, but that an entire community participated in sustaining it. The community became the medium through which the illusion acquired the force of reality.

That theme connects directly with your ongoing exploration of narrative and metaphysics. Stories are not inherently good or bad; they become life-giving or life-destroying depending on whether they deepen reality or sever us from it. In that sense, spiritual abuse can be understood as a communal distortion of reality that becomes embodied in the lives of the most vulnerable.

I also find your title memorable. It is unsettling - which is appropriate for an essay confronting the ways religious communities can unintentionally, or sometimes intentionally, place unbearable burdens upon children. It invites the reader to ask, "How could this happen?" Or, "How did we allow this cruelty to happen?"


Question 3

To say the least, the movie and it's implications is quite emotionally upsetting. Next question, why is the guilty older sister on the soundstage repeating the words, "In. Out. In. Out."

Chatbot Response

You're referring to Anna's older sister at the end of The Wonder. Her behavior can be understood as the delayed emergence of guilt after the constructed illusion begins to collapse.

Throughout the film, the family and community have participated - either actively or passively - in sustaining Anna's fasting. Each person tells themselves they are doing God's will, protecting Anna's soul, or honoring a miracle. That shared belief allows them to suppress what would otherwise be unbearable: that a child is slowly dying.

When Lib breaks that narrative, the moral reality comes rushing back. The sister can no longer hide behind the communal story. What she sees is not a "holy child" but her little sister, who has been allowed to waste away.

Psychologically, this resembles what is sometimes called moral awakening. Once the belief system that justified harmful behavior collapses, guilt, grief, and remorse often surface all at once. The sister's emotional response is therefore less about a sudden change of heart than about the collapse of the protective illusion that had insulated her from the truth.

One of the film's most unsettling messages is that ordinary people can become participants in profound harm without seeing themselves as cruel. They genuinely believe they are doing good. That is why the film is so disturbing: there is no cartoon villain. Instead, there is a web of sincere belief, fear, religious conviction, family loyalty, and social pressure that together produces tragedy.

That theme may be the deepest lesson of the film - and one that extends far beyond 19th-century Ireland. Communities, whether religious, political, or ideological, can become so committed to a shared story that they lose sight of the human being standing in front of them.

If writing an essay, I would encourage you not to make the essay simply as an indictment of abusive religion. The deeper and more universal argument is that any community can become captive to a story that justifies sacrificing its most vulnerable members. Religion is one powerful example, but the underlying psychological and social dynamics are profoundly human. Meaning that any human institution, organization, or  form of association can imprison its members mentally, bodily, spiritually, religiously, institutionally, etc and etc. Churches and religious groups are not the only guilty parties herein.


Question 4

Continuing my last thought, the older sister now will live with personal guilt the remainder of her life despite awakening to the lie she had sustained with her family, church, parish priest, family doctor and villagers.

Chatbot Response

Yes. I think that's one of the film's quietest and most tragic dimensions.

The older sister is not portrayed as malicious. She is portrayed as someone who participated in a system that she trusted. As a child herself, she would have been shaped by the same religious authority, family expectations, and village culture as Anna. That doesn't remove her responsibility, but it places it within a wider web of influence.

Once Anna is rescued, however, the sister is left with something very difficult: retrospective knowledge. She now knows that what she helped sustain was not a miracle but the slow destruction of her sister. That realization could become a lifelong burden.

Psychologically, several experiences might follow:

  • Survivor's guilt ("Why did I live while Anna nearly died?")
  • Moral injury ("I participated in something I now recognize as deeply wrong.")
  • Complicated grief, because the object of grief is not only Anna's suffering but also the loss of trust in the adults and institutions she believed were protecting them.
  • Spiritual disillusionment, where faith itself becomes intertwined with betrayal.

In that sense, she is another victim. Not in the same way Anna was, but as someone who inherited a belief system that distorted her moral judgment.

This is where your proposed essay could become especially profound. Rather than asking, "Who is to blame?", you might ask, "How does a community become capable of sacrificing its own children while believing it is serving God?"

That shifts the discussion from individual guilt to collective moral failure.

It also resonates with a recurring biblical theme. Ezekiel rejects the proverb, "The parents have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge," insisting that children should not bear their parents' guilt. Yet history repeatedly shows societies doing exactly that. Children inherit the fears, prejudices, conflicts, and unresolved guilt of the adults around them.

Perhaps one of the most haunting insights your essay could develop is this:

Children rarely invent the stories that wound them. They inherit them from communities that sincerely believe they are telling the truth.

That sentence captures what The Wonder reveals so painfully. Anna's tragedy was not that she believed a lie. It was that everyone she trusted believed it first. The same was true, in different ways, for her older sister. Both girls were shaped by a community whose moral imagination had become captive to a destructive narrative.

That is a sobering lesson not only for religion, but for every institution that forms the minds and consciences of children.


Question 5

Stories like this happen all too often in rural, family, urban, or isolated settings. They become almost cultic in their own way, whether based in religious belief or through some other narrative that is  perversely embraced by those invested in their story.

Chatbot Response

I think that's an important observation, and it broadens the discussion beyond The Wonder.

The key variable is probably not geography but social isolation and narrative closure.

Rural communities can be vulnerable because they may be small, close-knit, and culturally homogeneous. But urban communities can become just as isolated when they form insular subcultures—religious sects, ideological groups, families, gangs, or even online communities—that reinforce a single worldview while discouraging outside perspectives.

Psychologists and sociologists have long studied this phenomenon. Common features include:

  • A closed interpretive system, where every event confirms the group's beliefs.
  • Strong authority structures, where questioning leaders or traditions is treated as disloyalty or sin.
  • Social reinforcement, in which everyone validates everyone else's interpretation.
  • Isolation from corrective voices, whether physical, emotional, or intellectual.
  • Moral inversion, where actions that would normally seem harmful become viewed as righteous or necessary.

Those dynamics do not require a formal cult. They can emerge in ordinary families, churches, schools, political movements, or other tightly knit communities. The difference is one of degree rather than kind.

That is one reason The Wonder is so unsettling. It does not depict an obvious cult. It depicts an ordinary village. The people love one another, attend church, care for neighbors, and yet collectively sustain a child's starvation because their shared story has become stronger than the evidence before their eyes.

This intersects with something you've been developing throughout your Reality & Metaphysics series: human beings live by stories. Stories are indispensable. They organize meaning, identity, and hope. But when a story becomes closed to reality—unable to be corrected by experience, compassion, or evidence—it ceases to be a life-giving narrative and becomes an imprisoning one.

That distinction may become one of the central theses of your essay:

A healthy story remains open to reality. A destructive story demands that reality conform to itself.

I think that sentence captures the philosophical heart of what The Wonder is exploring. It also connects naturally with your process-relational perspective. In an open and relational worldview, truth is never preserved by suppressing experience. Rather, truth is continually refined through relationship, evidence, compassion, and the courage to revise our stories when reality discloses something new.

In that sense, the antidote to communal delusion is not cynicism or the abandonment of all narratives. It is the cultivation of communities humble enough to let reality correct the stories they tell. That is as much a moral discipline as it is an intellectual one.


Question 6

It was telling, too, that the nurse destroyed the laudanum that was helping her exist in the painful death of her months-old child. When she burned the house down, she also destroyed the laudanum and the baby shoes that were holding her to a painful memory and existence herself. So, with the cleansing act by fire and the kidnapping of the child into a healthier environment, she also cleansed her soul by destroying the elements that were holding her back from returning to life.

Chatbot Response

I think you've noticed one of the film's most carefully constructed parallels.

Lib Wright is not simply rescuing Anna. She is also, in a sense, being rescued herself.

The laudanum is significant because it represents more than physical dependence. It is Lib's way of remaining connected to grief without actually living through it. She exists in a suspended state, neither fully dead emotionally nor fully alive. The baby shoes serve a similar symbolic purpose. They are precious, but they have become relics anchoring her to a past she cannot release.

When the house burns, several things happen simultaneously:

  • Anna's "old self" dies symbolically.
  • Lib's old life is also consumed.
  • The instruments of both women's captivity disappear.
  • A future, however uncertain, becomes imaginable.

From a psychological perspective, this resembles a transition from complicated grief toward acceptance and integration. Healthy grieving does not require forgetting the child. Rather, it means no longer organizing one's entire identity around the loss. Destroying the shoes is therefore not an act of forgetting; it is an act of relinquishing the idea that her life must remain frozen in that moment.

Fire has long carried this symbolism across cultures—not merely destruction but purification, transformation, and renewal. The film uses that symbolism very deliberately.

What I find especially beautiful is that neither woman heals alone.

Anna needs Lib to offer a new story: one in which she can live without carrying the burden of her brother's sins.

Lib needs Anna to discover that she herself is still capable of choosing life after devastating loss.

Each becomes, in different ways, the other's means of healing.

That mutuality strikes me as deeply process-relational. Healing does not descend from outside as a magical intervention. It emerges through relationship. Neither character possesses the whole answer. Each participates in the other's becoming.

There is one more subtle observation that may fit your philosophical work. Throughout the film, there are two competing forms of sacrifice.

The village believes that salvation comes through Anna's death. Lib discovers that salvation comes through letting a false story die instead.

That is a profound inversion. The film ultimately argues that what must perish is not the child but the narrative that demands her sacrifice.

Given your work on narrative, myth, and reality, I think that distinction is one of the film's deepest insights. It suggests that genuine redemption often begins not with the death of a person, but with the death of a destructive story. That idea would sit naturally alongside your essays on transformative imagination, where myths and symbols can either imprison human becoming or open it toward greater truth, freedom, and life.


Question 7

Lib's act of rescue and adoption reinforces the dependent relationship between herself and her new charge, Nan. But also... by these acts they will continue memory in a constructive manner that lives for as long as Lib and Nan remain together as adopting mother and "orphaned" child rescued from a family, a religion, and a community willing to allow abuse and murder.

Chatbot Response

Yes—and I think you've identified the film's final movement.

The ending is not simply about escape. It is about the creation of a new relational identity.

Neither Lib nor Anna is "healed" by forgetting. Instead, each carries memory differently.

  • Anna does not erase what happened. She is given permission to stop living inside the story that demanded her death.
  • Lib does not erase the memory of her daughter. She stops allowing grief to define every moment of her existence.

When they become a family, their relationship does something psychologically profound: it recontextualizes memory.

Traumatic memory often traps people in the past. Constructive relationships don't erase those memories; they weave them into a new life. Anna will always remember her brother and her village. Lib will always remember her daughter. But now those memories exist within a relationship characterized by protection, trust, and hope rather than fear and despair.

This is one of the central insights of attachment psychology. Secure, loving relationships can become the context in which traumatic memories are gradually integrated rather than continually relived. The past remains true, but it no longer dictates the future.

I also think your phrase—

"orphaned from family, religious, and community abuse"

—is especially evocative. Anna becomes an orphan in more than the legal sense. She is severed from an entire moral world that failed to protect her. She has lost not only a family but an identity, a community, and a religious imagination.

Yet the film refuses to end in mere loss. It suggests that families can be formed as well as inherited. Healing sometimes comes through relationships freely chosen rather than biologically given.

That connects deeply with one of your recurring themes: being and becoming.

Anna's being is not erased. Lib's being is not erased. Rather, their becoming changes because they enter into a new relationship. Their identities are no longer primarily organized around trauma but around mutual care.

From a process-relational perspective, that is almost a philosophical statement:

We are not only shaped by the stories that wound us; we are also reshaped by the relationships that teach us to live beyond those stories.

That, to me, is the hopeful ending of The Wonder. The miracle is not supernatural. The miracle is relational. Two broken lives become the conditions for each other's continued becoming. In your own philosophical language, they do not escape reality—they re-enter reality through love, trust, and a future that neither could have created alone.


Question 8

Also, often, identity and meaning must transfer from one physical location to another physical location, so that transformation may proceed along more healthy lines of living.

Chatbot Response

I think that's an important insight, and it has both psychological and philosophical support.

In psychology, place is rarely just place. Physical environments become saturated with memory, emotion, and meaning. A house, a church, a village, or even a room can continually reactivate trauma. When someone leaves that environment, they are not merely changing geography; they are interrupting a network of cues that reinforce an old identity.

This is why, in many cases of abuse or coercive control, healing often requires more than changing one's beliefs. It requires changing one's environment. A new physical setting provides space in which a new self can begin to emerge.

From your process-relational perspective, you could express it this way:

Becoming is always embodied. Therefore, transformation is often spatial as well as psychological.

Or even:

Identity is not merely carried within the mind. It is distributed across relationships, places, rituals, memories, and communities. To become someone new often requires entering a new ecology of becoming.

I especially like that phrase—an ecology of becoming. It fits remarkably well with your philosophy.

In The Wonder, Anna could not simply decide to think differently while remaining in the same village. Every aspect of her environment—the family, priest, doctor, neighbors, and even the room in which she lay fasting—reinforced the same story. The village itself had become an ecology that sustained the narrative of sacrifice.

Only by leaving could a different narrative take root.

The same pattern appears throughout history and literature:

  • The Exodus requires leaving Egypt before Israel can become a new people.
  • Exile becomes the setting for Israel's theological transformation.
  • The Buddha leaves the palace.
  • Monastics withdraw into the desert.
  • Refugees often discover that healing begins only after reaching a place of safety.
  • Survivors of abusive homes frequently report that the first real step toward recovery was physically leaving.

Notice that in each case, movement through space becomes movement in identity.

That observation may become an important principle in your metaphysics:

Transformation is relationally embodied. Because persons are constituted through their relations, profound change often requires not only new ideas but new relationships, new practices, and sometimes new places.

I think this extends one of your central themes beautifully. Reality is not merely a collection of things but a web of embodied relationships. Consequently, healing is not simply an inward event; it is the gradual reconfiguration of that web. Sometimes the first step in becoming is, quite literally, to walk out of the old world and into another.


Question 9

Another observation, in the beginning of the movie, the seaport harbor holding the masted ships came to be a foreshadowing for the ending of the movie... thus completing the pain of multiple stories, including the husband's who lost his family to intentional starvation as well when they boarded up their home... perhaps remembering yet another cruel act where family members were not allowed escape from enforced suicide.

Chatbot Response

Yes. I think you've picked up on a subtle structural device in The Wonder.

The harbor is more than a location. It functions as a threshold—a place between worlds.

At the beginning, Lib arrives by ship carrying her own unresolved grief. She is emotionally stranded, much as the village itself is stranded in its beliefs. The harbor suggests movement and possibility, but neither Lib nor the villagers are yet capable of changing.

By the end, the harbor has acquired a completely different meaning. It is no longer merely where Lib arrived; it is where Lib and Anna depart. The physical journey mirrors the psychological one.

Your observation about Lib's husband is also significant. The film quietly reveals that he lost his family during the Great Famine. That history haunts him. Starvation is therefore not an abstract medical condition for either of them—it is a lived memory.

There is a tragic irony here:

  • Lib's husband witnessed involuntary starvation brought about by famine and social failure.
  • Anna undergoes voluntary starvation, but only because an entire community has made it appear spiritually necessary.

The mechanisms differ, but in both cases society fails to protect the vulnerable.

Your phrase—

"...where family members were not allowed escape."

—is especially poignant. During the famine, many families literally could not escape poverty, eviction, disease, and hunger. In Anna's case, she cannot escape a closed moral world that interprets her starvation as holy.

In both stories, the inability to leave becomes part of the tragedy.

That makes the ending all the more meaningful. The voyage is not simply travel; it is liberation. The ship becomes a symbol of a future that neither famine nor fanaticism can wholly determine.

There is another process-relational insight here that I think fits your own work.

You have often spoken of rupture, transition, and renewed becoming. The harbor embodies all three.

  • It is where one story ends.
  • It is where another has not yet begun.
  • It is the liminal space in which transformation becomes possible.

In anthropology, thinkers like Victor Turner called this liminality—the "in-between" state where old identities have been relinquished but new ones are still emerging.

So the harbor is not just a setting. It is the film's metaphysical symbol of becoming.

Knowing the themes you've been developing, I could easily imagine an essay titled something like:

Harbors of Becoming: Why Transformation Often Requires Leaving Home

It would explore not only The Wonder, but also Exodus, exile, immigration, trauma recovery, pilgrimage, and your own idea that healthy becoming sometimes requires crossing into a new relational world where life can begin again. That would fit remarkably well with both your metaphysics and your emerging theology.


Question 10

I may have missed other parts of the storyline in my questions above. I wonder if you can pick up across the Internet some of the major motifs that we have not covered here between us.

Chatbot Response

After looking through reviews, discussions, and critical analyses, I actually think we've already identified many of the film's deepest themes. There are, however, several important motifs that critics repeatedly notice which we haven't discussed as much.

The first is the opening and closing fourth wall. The film begins on a modern soundstage and ends there again, with the narrator reminding us, "We are nothing without stories." The director is deliberately telling us that The Wonder is not simply about nineteenth-century Ireland. It is about us. We are invited to ask not, "How could they believe such a thing?" but, "What stories do we believe today?"

Second is the tension between watching and acting.

Throughout the film, Lib is repeatedly told:

"You are only here to watch."

That instruction becomes symbolic. Everyone watches:

  • the priest,
  • the doctor,
  • the committee,
  • the nun,
  • the villagers,
  • even the audience.

The moral question becomes: When does observation become complicity? Critics have noted that the film turns the audience into another observer, forcing us to confront our own passivity.

Third—and I think this one would interest you greatly—is the conflict between competing stories rather than science versus religion.

Most reviewers initially describe the film as science versus faith. I think that's too simplistic.

Instead, there are actually three stories competing:

  • the village's miracle story,
  • Lib's medical story,
  • and finally a third story—the redemptive fiction of "Nan."

Ironically, Anna is not saved by brute facts alone. She is saved by a healthier story. Critics have repeatedly pointed out that the film isn't anti-story; it argues that human beings inevitably live by stories, and the question is whether those stories give life or demand death.

That aligns almost perfectly with your own philosophy.

Another motif is the aftermath of famine.

The Great Famine is not merely historical background. It becomes the emotional atmosphere of the film.

Everyone has been shaped by starvation.

Lib's husband.

William.

The villagers.

The landscape itself.

The miracle of fasting only makes sense because the community has lived through famine. Hunger has become both historical memory and religious language.

One motif I hadn't appreciated until reading more criticism is English versus Irish identity.

Lib arrives as an English outsider in a community still deeply wounded by English rule after the famine. The villagers therefore distrust her almost instinctively. The film suggests that truth is difficult to hear when it comes from someone associated with historical oppression.

Finally—and this may be the deepest theme of all—is something you've been saying all along:

Communities become custodians of stories.

The village isn't evil.

It is faithful.

Faithful to a story.

That distinction matters.

Once a story becomes more sacred than the life of the child standing before them, compassion becomes subordinate to doctrine.

That, I think, is the film's central warning.


I would add one motif that I have not seen critics emphasize but which emerged from our conversation.

You observed that healing required relocation.

I think that's profound.

The film is structured around movement:

  • England → Ireland
  • harbor → village
  • observation → participation
  • house → fire
  • village → Dublin
  • Ireland → Australia

Every major transformation is accompanied by a geographical transition.

From your process-relational perspective, this isn't accidental.

It suggests a principle I have not seen articulated in reviews:

Profound becoming often requires a change in relational geography.

Not merely a change of beliefs, but a change in the web of relationships, places, memories, and practices that constitute identity.

I honestly think that insight is original. It grows naturally out of your own work on embodied process, relation, and becoming.

And one final thought.

If you eventually write "The Little Children Shall Bear the Sins of Many," I would not make The Wonder the subject of the essay.

I would make it the opening parable.

Begin with Anna.

Then move to psychology.

Then to sociology.

Then to religious and ideological communities.

Then finally ask the larger philosophical question:

How do loving communities come to believe that sacrificing a child is an act of love?

That question reaches far beyond one film. It touches history, religion, politics, education, and every community that has ever mistaken fidelity to a story for fidelity to reality. I suspect that is the essay you are really beginning to envision.


Question 11

There is also one other motif or theme here when committing a crime "to do the right thing." In this case, the nurse would kidnap Anna. And though it all went well, it could have all gone bad. But if so, the indictments and results would come from a self-righteous community which would imprison or hang the offending nurse for her criminal act of kidnapping.... And I would say a hypocritical act because the condemning community would not wish to admit any of its own participation in the murder  of a child within this dark evolving story.

Chatbot Response

I think you've touched on one of the film's deepest ethical tensions.

Lib does, in fact, commit what the law would regard as a crime. She conspires to deceive the village, stages Anna's "death," burns the house (whether interpreted literally or symbolically within the plot), and removes a child from her family without legal authority. None of those acts are morally uncomplicated.

The film doesn't ask us to celebrate lawbreaking as such. Instead, it asks a much harder question:

What happens when the moral order and the legal or social order have become so disconnected that obeying the rules perpetuates injustice?

This question appears throughout history:

  • People who hid Jewish families during the Holocaust broke the law.
  • Conductors on the Underground Railroad violated laws protecting slavery.
  • Those who sheltered abused children against the wishes of abusive parents have sometimes acted outside legal norms.
  • Whistleblowers often violate institutional rules to expose wrongdoing.

The difficult ethical issue is that there is no formula. The same logic—"I broke the law for a higher good"—has also been used to justify terrible acts. That is why such decisions are morally perilous.

I think The Wonder acknowledges this uncertainty. Lib has no guarantee she is right. She acts because, from everything she has observed, inaction will almost certainly result in Anna's death. She chooses the risk of intervention over the certainty of continued harm.

Your observation about the community is equally important.

Had Lib failed, the village might well have interpreted events in a way that reinforced its existing beliefs. Communities deeply invested in a narrative often protect that narrative by finding a scapegoat. Lib, as the English outsider, would have been the obvious candidate. The community could have condemned her while avoiding the painful recognition of its own participation.

That dynamic is well known in social psychology. Groups often preserve their moral self-image by externalizing blame rather than confronting collective responsibility.

This brings us back to one of the recurring themes in your work:

Communities, like individuals, develop identities they feel compelled to protect.

Sometimes those identities become so important that acknowledging error feels like the community itself would die. In those moments, admitting the truth can seem more threatening than continuing the harm.

That is why genuine repentance—whether personal or communal—is so difficult. It requires allowing an old identity to die so that a healthier one can emerge.

There is another process-relational observation here that may fit your philosophy.

Lib's action is creative but risky.

Whitehead often spoke of creativity as the introduction of genuine novelty into the world. Novelty is never guaranteed to succeed. Every new possibility carries uncertainty because the future is genuinely open.

In your own language, Lib does not possess certainty; she possesses responsible hope. She acts because the existing trajectory leads toward death, and she believes another future is possible. Whether that future will be realized cannot be known in advance.

That is, in many ways, an ethic of becoming. It refuses fatalism without claiming omniscience.

I also think the film quietly leaves us with a lasting question:

When does fidelity to life require us to resist the very institutions that claim to protect it?

The film does not answer that question once and for all. It invites us to wrestle with it. And perhaps that is its greatest ethical achievement: it resists turning a complex moral dilemma into a simple lesson. Instead, it asks us to weigh compassion, truth, law, responsibility, and risk together—a task that remains as difficult today as it was in Anna's village.