Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Saturday, January 18, 2025

The NT Book of Philippians: A Process Approach


The NT Book of Philippians:
A Process Approach
Part 2

by R.E. Slater & ChapGPT

Observation 1

What is the whitehead / John cobb process theology of philippians?

ChatGPT

The Whiteheadian and John Cobb-inspired process theological interpretation of Philippians reframes the text in a dynamic, relational, and evolutionary light, emphasizing God’s participatory involvement in the world and humanity’s co-creative role within God’s purposes. Below is a process theology perspective on key themes and passages in Philippians:

1. Philippians 1:6 – “He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion”

  • Process Theology Insight: This verse reflects the idea that God is not a static deity but is deeply involved in the ongoing creative processes of life. The "good work" signifies God’s lure toward higher possibilities and the fulfillment of creative potential in individuals and communities. John Cobb might frame this as the interplay of divine aims and human responses in a co-creative journey toward beauty, truth, and goodness.

2. Philippians 2:5-11 – The Christ Hymn (Kenosis)

  • Kenosis (Self-Emptying): The hymn describes Christ "emptying himself" to take on the form of a servant, culminating in exaltation.
  • Process Theology Insight: This self-emptying is seen as an expression of God’s relational nature, where divine power is expressed not through coercion but through persuasive love and vulnerability. For Whitehead and Cobb, Christ embodies the ideal of "creative transformation," where divinity works through humility and interconnectedness to bring about the renewal of creation.
  • Cosmic Perspective: Christ’s kenosis can be interpreted as the ultimate pattern of divine incarnation, where God enters the world not to dominate but to co-suffer, co-create, and bring about transformative possibilities for all beings.

3. Philippians 2:12-13 – “Work out your salvation…for it is God who works in you”

  • Process Theology Insight: This passage aligns with the process view that salvation is a participatory process. Humanity is invited to actively engage with the divine lure (God's aims for creation) while recognizing that God works within and alongside creation to empower transformation. Cobb emphasizes that salvation is not just individual but communal and ecological, as it involves aligning with God's aims for the flourishing of all.

4. Philippians 3:12-14 – “Press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God”

  • Process Theology Insight: This reflects the process concept of becoming—an ever-evolving journey toward greater realization of divine potential. God provides the "upward call" as a lure toward growth, creativity, and deeper relationality. Cobb might interpret this as a communal invitation to align with God’s purposes for justice, love, and transformation.

5. Philippians 4:4-7 – “Rejoice in the Lord…Do not be anxious…The peace of God”

  • Process Theology Insight: Joy, peace, and freedom from anxiety emerge when individuals align themselves with God's ongoing creative work in the world. The “peace of God” is not a removal of struggle but an invitation to trust in the divine presence that works through relationality and persuasion to bring about good even amidst chaos.

6. Philippians 4:8-9 – “Whatever is true, noble, right…think about such things”

  • Process Theology Insight: This verse resonates with Whitehead’s emphasis on the pursuit of truth, beauty, and goodness as central to existence. In process thought, God’s aim for creation is the maximization of these values, and human reflection on them enables deeper participation in God’s transformative purposes.

Key Themes of Philippians in Process Theology

  1. Relationality: Philippians emphasizes the interconnectedness of believers and God, which mirrors process theology’s relational metaphysics. God is not a distant sovereign but an intimate companion in the journey toward fulfillment.

  2. Becoming and Transformation: The text highlights the ongoing nature of spiritual growth and transformation, aligning with the process view that reality is dynamic and in flux, with God as the source of new possibilities.

  3. Kenosis and Divine Power: The humility and self-giving nature of Christ exemplify how divine power operates not through coercion but through relational influence, inviting participation in creative transformation.

  4. Cosmic and Communal Salvation: Philippians can be read as emphasizing that salvation is not only personal but also cosmic, involving the renewal of all creation in partnership with God’s aims.

By interpreting Philippians through a process theology lens, the text becomes a rich narrative of divine relationality, transformative becoming, and co-creative participation in God's work in the world. Cobb’s influence would further invite an ecological and global perspective, emphasizing how this process aligns with God’s vision for a just, harmonious, and flourishing world.

Observation 2a

Thx

ChatGPT

You're welcome! Let me know if you'd like to explore Philippians or other topics further through the lens of process theology. Always happy to help!

Observation 2b

How does Paul's Jewish theology re Christ not iterate process theology?

ChatGPT

Paul's Jewish theology, particularly as it relates to Christ, can be understood as resonating with key ideas in process theology, even if not explicitly articulating them. Here's how Paul's theology intersects with and differs from process thought:


1. Relationality and Covenant Theology

  • Paul's Jewish Theology: Paul’s understanding of God is deeply rooted in Jewish covenant theology. God is a relational deity who enters into covenant with Israel and works through history to fulfill divine promises. Christ, in Paul’s view, fulfills these promises as the ultimate covenant mediator.
  • Process Theology: Relationality is central to process theology. God is intimately involved in the world, influencing and being influenced by creation. While Paul doesn’t explicitly conceptualize God as being influenced by creation, his emphasis on God’s relational nature aligns with the process view of God as deeply connected to the world.

2. Christ as the Agent of New Creation

  • Paul's Jewish Theology: In texts like 2 Corinthians 5:17, Paul sees Christ as initiating a new creation. This is rooted in Jewish eschatology, where God’s promises to renew creation are fulfilled in the Messiah. For Paul, this new creation is inaugurated through Christ’s death and resurrection.
  • Process Theology: The idea of a new creation aligns with process theology’s emphasis on creative transformation and the unfolding of divine possibilities. Christ can be seen as the ultimate expression of God’s "initial aim" for humanity—a concrete example of the divine lure toward transformation and renewal. Paul, however, frames this renewal as an eschatological event tied to divine sovereignty rather than an ongoing, evolving process.

3. Christ's Role in Salvation

  • Paul's Jewish Theology: Paul’s understanding of salvation is rooted in the Jewish concepts of atonement and redemption. In Romans 5, Paul presents Christ as the "second Adam" who reverses the effects of sin and death. Salvation is both a present reality ("already") and a future hope ("not yet"), mediated through Christ's life, death, and resurrection.
  • Process Theology: Salvation in process theology is an ongoing, participatory process rather than a completed act. While Paul emphasizes divine initiative, process thought highlights the co-creative role of humanity in working with God toward salvation. Paul’s "already-not-yet" eschatology, however, can be interpreted as compatible with the process view of salvation as an unfolding reality.

4. The Kenotic Nature of God in Christ

  • Paul's Jewish Theology: Philippians 2:5-11 reflects Paul’s understanding of Christ’s humility and self-emptying (kenosis). This is a distinctly relational and dynamic view of divine action, where God’s power is expressed through vulnerability and love rather than coercion.
  • Process Theology: Process theology emphasizes God’s persuasive, non-coercive power, which is perfectly illustrated in the kenosis of Christ. Paul’s Jewish theology of kenosis aligns with process thought by portraying divine power as relational and self-giving, though Paul does not frame it in metaphysical terms.

5. The Role of Creation in God’s Purposes

  • Paul's Jewish Theology: Romans 8:19-22 portrays creation groaning for redemption, awaiting liberation from decay. This reflects the Jewish view of creation as inherently good but in need of restoration, which will be achieved through God’s eschatological intervention.
  • Process Theology: Creation's groaning for redemption resonates with the process view of the world as an evolving system striving toward greater harmony and beauty. While Paul attributes this restoration to God’s sovereign intervention, process theology emphasizes the role of divine persuasion and the co-creative participation of all entities in the renewal of creation.

Key Differences

  1. Divine Immutability vs. Relational Dynamism:
    Paul, as a Jewish thinker, likely saw God as sovereign and unchanging in purpose, though relational in action. Process theology explicitly rejects divine immutability, portraying God as dynamically interacting with creation.

  2. Linear Eschatology vs. Ongoing Process:
    Paul’s theology operates within a framework of linear eschatology (creation → fall → redemption → consummation). Process theology views history as an open-ended, evolving process, with no definitive "end" but rather a continual realization of divine possibilities.

  3. Christocentric Focus vs. Broader Cosmic Perspective:
    Paul’s theology is explicitly Christocentric, focusing on Christ as the unique mediator of God’s purposes. Process theology, while affirming Christ as a significant embodiment of divine aims, allows for a broader cosmic perspective in which God is at work in all beings and events.


Conclusion: Points of Resonance and Divergence

Paul’s Jewish theology of Christ does not explicitly iterate process theology, but it contains themes that resonate deeply with process thought:

  • Relationality
  • Kenosis and divine persuasion
  • Creative transformation and new creation
  • The participatory nature of salvation

However, Paul’s framework is rooted in Jewish eschatology and a view of God as sovereign and transcendent, which contrasts with process theology’s emphasis on God’s immanence, relational dynamism, and co-creative engagement with creation. By reinterpreting Paul's theology through a process lens, one can see how it reflects humanity's evolving understanding of God as relational, transformative, and intimately involved in the world.

Observation 3

Fit philippians into the 21st century. Thank you.

ChatGPT

Reframing Philippians for the 21st century involves contextualizing its timeless themes—joy, humility, partnership, transformation, and divine love—in ways that resonate with modern challenges and aspirations. Below is a reinterpretation of Philippians for our contemporary world, blending relational spirituality, ethical action, and process-oriented thinking:


1. Philippians 1:3-11 – Partnership in Purpose

  • Paul’s Message: Paul expresses gratitude for the Philippians’ partnership in the gospel and confidence that God will complete the good work begun in them.
  • 21st-Century Context: This can inspire collaboration in addressing global challenges like climate change, social justice, and economic inequality. The “good work” begun in us can be seen as humanity’s shared journey toward ecological sustainability, equity, and the flourishing of life.
    • Reflection: In a world interconnected by technology and shared crises, our partnerships can reflect divine creativity, where every contribution helps shape a more harmonious and just future.

2. Philippians 2:1-11 – Humility and Servant Leadership

  • Paul’s Message: Paul calls for unity through humility, urging believers to adopt the mindset of Christ, who emptied himself (kenosis) to serve others.
  • 21st-Century Context: In an era of individualism, consumerism, and polarized societies, this call to humility challenges leaders and individuals to prioritize collective well-being over personal gain. Christ’s self-emptying can inspire servant leadership in politics, business, and daily life.
    • Reflection: Imagine a world where power is wielded not for domination but for empowerment, where humility leads to innovation, and where the strongest serve the most vulnerable.

3. Philippians 2:12-13 – Active Participation in Salvation

  • Paul’s Message: "Work out your salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you."
  • 21st-Century Context: Salvation here can be reimagined not as an individual escape from the world but as collective engagement in co-creating a better world. Whether addressing systemic racism, environmental degradation, or mental health, we are invited to align with divine creativity in shaping a just, compassionate society.
    • Reflection: We are not passive recipients of divine grace but active participants in weaving a future where all life flourishes.

4. Philippians 3:7-14 – Striving Toward a Greater Goal

  • Paul’s Message: Paul speaks of abandoning worldly achievements to pursue the ultimate goal of knowing Christ and participating in his resurrection power.
  • 21st-Century Context: This passage challenges the relentless pursuit of material success and invites a focus on deeper, enduring values—community, wisdom, and love. In a rapidly evolving world, it calls for prioritizing meaningful progress over superficial achievements.
    • Reflection: What if our "upward call" today is to align our lives with purposes that transcend self-interest, fostering innovation and compassion for generations to come?

5. Philippians 4:4-7 – Finding Peace in Turbulent Times

  • Paul’s Message: "Rejoice in the Lord always…Do not be anxious about anything…The peace of God will guard your hearts and minds."
  • 21st-Century Context: In a world of constant anxiety—from climate crises to political instability—this passage reminds us to cultivate inner peace as a foundation for action. Practices like mindfulness, gratitude, and relational trust echo this ancient wisdom, offering stability amidst chaos.
    • Reflection: Peace is not the absence of conflict but the presence of resilience and hope, grounded in love and trust.

6. Philippians 4:8-9 – Dwelling on What is Good

  • Paul’s Message: "Whatever is true, noble, right, pure, lovely…think about such things."
  • 21st-Century Context: In a time of media saturation and misinformation, this call to focus on truth and goodness is profoundly relevant. It encourages discernment in what we consume and share, fostering an ethic of positivity, beauty, and constructive dialogue.
    • Reflection: In a noisy world, let us amplify what uplifts, heals, and inspires—becoming curators of goodness in the digital and physical spaces we inhabit.

7. Philippians 4:10-13 – Contentment and Resilience

  • Paul’s Message: Paul speaks of learning to be content in all circumstances, finding strength through Christ.
  • 21st-Century Context: This is a countercultural message in a world of consumerism and perpetual dissatisfaction. It reminds us of the power of gratitude and inner resilience, essential for navigating challenges like economic pressures, burnout, and personal crises.
    • Reflection: True strength lies in cultivating contentment, adaptability, and reliance on a power greater than ourselves, even amidst uncertainty.

Key 21st-Century Themes

  1. Relational Unity in Diversity: Philippians emphasizes unity rooted in humility and shared purpose. In the 21st century, this can inspire movements toward inclusivity, interfaith dialogue, and global cooperation.

  2. Servant Leadership as a Model for Change: The kenotic example of Christ offers a blueprint for leadership that prioritizes service, empathy, and transformative action in modern contexts.

  3. Resilience and Hope in Uncertainty: Philippians provides a framework for navigating crises with hope, grounded in trust in God’s active presence and our capacity to co-create with the divine.

  4. Ethics of Beauty, Truth, and Goodness: By encouraging focus on what is noble and pure, Philippians invites a modern ethic that counters cynicism and promotes constructive engagement.


By framing Philippians within the context of process theology and contemporary challenges, it becomes a guide for navigating the complexities of modern life with relationality, purpose, and transformative love.


The NT Book of Philippians - Introduction





The Epistle to the Philippians is a book in the Christian Bible's New Testament. It is believed to have been written by Paul the Apostle and Timothy, and is addressed to the Christian church in Philippi.

What is known about the book?
  • It is generally accepted that the book is authentically Pauline.
  • It is likely a combination of multiple letters written by Paul to the Philippians.
  • The letters may have been written between 52–55 AD in Ephesus, or 57–59 AD in Caesarea Maritima.
  • The most likely place of origin is Rome, around 62 AD.
  • Paul likely wrote his letters to the Philippians while imprisoned in Rome.
What else is known about Philippi?
  • Paul, Timothy, Silas, and possibly Luke first visited Philippi during Paul's second missionary journey.
  • Paul and Silas were accused of "disturbing the city" during their visit to Philippi.




Epistle to the Philippians
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Philippians" redirects here. Not to be confused with Philippines, Filipinos, or Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians. "Phl." redirects here. For other, see PHL (disambiguation).

The Epistle to the Philippians[a] is a Pauline epistle of the New Testament of the Christian Bible. The epistle is attributed to Paul the Apostle and Timothy is named with him as co-author or co-sender. The letter is addressed to the Christian church in Philippi.[3] Paul, Timothy, Silas (and perhaps Luke) first visited Philippi in Greece (Macedonia) during Paul's second missionary journey from Antioch, which occurred between approximately 50 and 52 AD. In the account of his visit in the Acts of the Apostles, Paul and Silas are accused of "disturbing the city".[4]

There is a general consensus that Philippians consists of authentically Pauline material, and that the epistle is a composite of multiple letter fragments from Paul to the church in Philippi.[5][6]: 17  These letters could have been written from Ephesus in 52–55 AD or Caesarea Maritima in 57–59, but the most likely city of provenance is Rome, around 62 AD, or about 10 years after Paul's first visit to Philippi.[7]

Composition

Ruins of Philippi, a city in Thrace (northeast Greece)

Starting in the 1960s, a consensus emerged among biblical scholars that Philippians was not written as one unified letter, but rather as a compilation of fragments from three separate letters from Paul to the church in Philippi.[6]: 17  According to Philip Sellew, Philippians contains the following letter fragments:

  • Letter A consists of Philippians 4:10–20. It is a short thank-you note from Paul to the Philippian church, regarding gifts they had sent him.[8]
  • Letter B consists of Philippians 1:1–3:1, and may also include 4:4–9 and 4:21–23.
  • Letter C consists of Philippians 3:2–4:1, and may also include 4:2–3. It is a testament to Paul's rejection of all worldly things for the sake of the gospel of Jesus.[6]: 19 

In support of the idea that Philippians is a composite work, Sellew pointed to the abrupt shifts in tone and topic within the text. There also seem to be chronological inconsistencies from one chapter to the next concerning Paul's associate Epaphroditus:

Another argument against unity has been found in the swiftly changing fortunes of Epaphroditus: this associate of Paul is at the point of death in chapter two (Phil 2:25–30), where seemingly he has long been bereft of the company of the Philippian Christians; Paul says that he intended to send him back to Philippi after this apparently lengthy, or at least near-fatal separation. Two chapters later, however, at the end of the canonical letter, Paul notes that Epaphroditus had only now just arrived at Paul's side, carrying a gift from Philippi, a reference found toward the close of the "thank-you note" as a formulaic acknowledgement of receipt at Phil 4:18.

— Philip Sellew[6]: 18 

These letter fragments likely would have been edited into a single document by the first collector of the Pauline corpus, although there is no clear consensus among scholars regarding who this initial collector may have been, or when the first collection of Pauline epistles may have been published.[6]: 26 

Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1009, containing part of Philippians (3rd century AD)

Today, a number of scholars believe that Philippians is a composite of multiple letter fragments. According to the theologian G. Walter Hansen, "The traditional view that Philippians was composed as one letter in the form presented in the NT [New Testament] can no longer claim widespread support."[5]

Regardless of the literary unity of the letter, scholars agree that the material that was compiled into the Epistle to the Philippians was originally composed in Koine Greek, sometime during the 50s or early 60s AD.[9]

Place of writing

Rome, Philippi, and Ephesus in the Mediterranean
Ruins of Ephesus amphitheater with the harbor street leading to the coastline (2004)

It is uncertain where Paul was when he wrote the letter(s) that make up Philippians. Internal evidence in the letter itself points clearly to it being composed while Paul was in custody,[10] but it is unclear which period of imprisonment the letter refers to. If the sequence of events given in the Acts of the Apostles is to be trusted, candidates would include the Roman imprisonment at the end of Acts,[11] and the earlier Caesarean imprisonment.[12] Any identification of the place of writing of Philippians is complicated by the fact that some scholars view Acts as being an unreliable source of information about the early Church.[13]

Jim Reiher has suggested that the letters could stem from the second period of Roman imprisonment attested by early church fathers.[14][15] The main reasons suggested for a later date include:

  1. The letter's highly developed Ecclesiology
  2. An impending sense of death permeating the letter
  3. The absence of any mention of Luke in a letter to Luke's home church (when the narrative in Acts clearly suggests that Luke was with Paul in his first Roman imprisonment)
  4. A harsher imprisonment than the open house arrest of his first Roman imprisonment
  5. A similar unique expression that is shared only with 2 Timothy
  6. A similar disappointment with co-workers shared only with 2 Timothy

Surviving early manuscripts

The original manuscript or manuscripts of the epistle are lost, and the text of surviving copies varies. The earliest surviving manuscripts were made centuries later, and include complete and partial copies:

Outline

Head-piece to Philippians. Philippians 2:7-8. Print made by James Heath. 1800. Published by T. Macklin, London.
I. Preface (1:1–11)[18]
A. Salutation (1:1–2)
B. Thanksgiving for the Philippians’ Participation in the Gospel (1:3–8)
C. Prayer for the Philippians’ Discerning Love to Increase until the Day of Christ (1:9–11)
II. Paul’s Present Circumstances (1:12–26)
A. Paul’s Imprisonment (1:12–13)
B. The Brothers’ Response (1:14–17)
C. Paul’s Attitude (1:18–26)
III. Practical Instructions in Sanctification (1:27–2:30)
A. Living Boldly as Citizens of Heaven (1:27–1:30)
B. Living Humbly as Servants of Christ (2:1–11)
1. The Motivation to Live Humbly (2:1–4)
2. The Model of Living Humbly (2:5–11)
a. Christ’s Emptying (2:5–8)
b. Christ’s Exaltation (2:9–11)
C. Living Obediently as Children of God (2:12–18)
1. The Energizing of God (2:12–13)
2. The Effect on the Saints (2:14–18)
D. Examples of Humble Servants (2:19–30)
1. The Example of Timothy (2:19–24)
2. The Example of Epaphroditus (2:25–30)
IV. Polemical Doctrinal Issues (3:1–4:1)
A. The Judaizers Basis: The Flesh (3:1–6)
B. Paul’s Goal: The Resurrection (3:7–11)
C. Perfection and Humility (3:12–16)
D. Paul as an Example of Conduct and Watchfulness (3:17–4:1)
V. Postlude (4:2–23)
A. Exhortations (4:2–9)
1. Being United (4:2–3)
2. Rejoicing without Anxiety (4:4–7)
3. Thinking and Acting Purely (4:8–9)
B. A Note of Thanks (4:10–20)
1. Paul’s Contentment (4:10–13)
2. The Philippians’ Gift (4:14–18)
3. God’s Provision (4:19–20)
C. Final Greetings (4:21–23)

Chapters 1 and 2

In Chapters 1 and 2 of Philippians (Letter B), Paul sends word to the Philippians of his upcoming sentence in Rome and of his optimism in the face of death,[19] along with exhortations to imitate his capacity to rejoice in the Lord despite one's circumstances.[20] Paul assures the Philippians that his imprisonment is actually helping to spread the Christian message, rather than hindering it.[21] He also expresses gratitude for the devotion and heroism of Epaphroditus, whom the Philippian church had sent to visit Paul and bring him gifts.[22] Some time during his visit with Paul, Epaphroditus apparently contracted some life-threatening debilitating illness.[23] But he recovers before being sent back to the Philippians.

Greeting (1:1–2)

The epistle opens using a formula found in other Paul's epistles, here with the introduction of himself and Timothy as Christ's "slaves" ("bondservants") as in Romans 1:1.[24]

Verse 1:1 is translated in the New King James Version as:

Paul and Timothy, bondservants of Jesus Christ,
To all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons:[25]

"Bishops and deacons" could be translated as "overseers" and "helpers";[26] their functions in the church were not the same as they would later become.[27]

Verse 1:2 is translated:

Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.[28]

The wording is identical to Ephesians 1:2.[29]

Thanksgiving and prayer (1:3–11)

This is a common feature in Paul's epistles.[27] Except in Galatians, Paul thanks or blesses God for the good things he has heard about a particular church in the beginning of his letters.[30] In this epistle, Paul mixes it with his prayer for the church (1:3–4) and with joy (1:5), "a combination he will recommend in 4:6".[30] Lutheran pietist Johann Albrecht Bengel says that the whole letter can this be summarised: "The sum of the epistle is, I rejoice, rejoice ye".[31] Similarly Paul writes to the ThessaloniansRejoice always; pray without ceasing.[32]

Paul's situation in chains (1:12–26)

This section deals with Paul's condition during the confinement in a Roman administrative center, where he could still preach the gospel.[27] It consists of two subsections with distinctive keywords: the first subsection (verses 12–18) was marked off with two words, "progress" (prokope; verse 12) and "confidence" (verse 14), whereas the second subsection (verses 19–26) has the inclusio markers "joy", "progress" and "trusting".[33]

Verse 1:21 is translated:

For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.[34]

"To die is gain": that is, when a believer dies one enters into the presence of God, where fullness of joy is, and immediately with Christ, which is far better than being alive here. This common interpretation is shown by the Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopian versions, which read, "to die (or "if I die"), it is gain to me".[35]

Unity of minds and hearts (2:1–4)

This section centers on Paul's appeal for unity of minds and hearts among the people, which can be expressed by four phrases: two using the keyword phronein ("of the same mind" or "of one mind"), then agape ("love") and sumpsuchoi ("united in soul" or "being in full accord").[36] Maintaining his reference to the joy which Paul already feels in respect to the Philippians (verses 1:4 and 1:25), he speaks of this joy being "made full, like a measure".[37]

Verse 2:1 is translated in the King James Version:

If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies,[38]

Meyer notes Paul's use of "four stimulative elements", which are assumed to apply and are not conditional.[37] H. C. G. Moule notes that the word "bowels", as in the King James Version, was not used in any English version before 1582,[39] and offers "tender mercies and compassions", as in the Revised Version (1881), as better wording:[40] likewise the New International Version (1973 onwards) refers to "tenderness and compassion.[41]

Christ poem (2:5–11)

Chapter 2 of the epistle contains a famous poem describing the nature of Christ and his act of redemption:

Who, though he was in the form of God,

Did not regard being equal with God
Something to be grasped after.

But he emptied himself

Taking on the form of a slave,
And coming in the likeness of humans.

And being found in appearance as a human

He humbled himself
Becoming obedient unto death— even death on a cross.

Therefore God highly exalted him

And bestowed on him the name
That is above every name,

That at the name of Jesus

Every knee should bow
Of those in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth.

And every tongue should confess

That Jesus Christ is Lord
To the glory of God the Father.
— Philippians 2:5–11, translated by Bart D. Ehrman[42]

Due to its unique poetic style, Bart D. Ehrman suggests that this passage constitutes an early Christian poem that was composed by someone else prior to Paul's writings, as early as the mid-late 30s AD and was later used by Paul in his epistle. While the passage is often called a "hymn", some scholars believe this to be an inappropriate name since it does not have a rhythmic or metrical structure in the original Greek.[42] This theory was first proposed by German Protestant theologian Ernst Lohmeyer in 1928, and this "has come to dominate both exegesis of Philippians and study of early Christology and credal formulas".[43]

The Frankfurt silver inscription, the oldest known reliable evidence for Christianity north of the Alps (dating from between 230 and 270), quotes a Latin translation of Philippians 2:10–11.[44]

Incarnation Christology

Some find the Christ poem significant because it strongly suggests that there were very early Christians who understood Jesus to be a pre-existent celestial being, who chose to take on human form, rather than a human who was later exalted to a divine status.[45][42]

While the author of the poem apparently believed that Jesus existed in heaven before his physical incarnation, there is some debate about whether he was believed to be equal to God the Father prior to his death and resurrection. This largely depends on how the Greek words morphe (μορφή) and harpagmon (ἁρπαγμόνaccusative form of ἁρπαγμός) are understood.

Scholars such as English theologian J.B. Lightfoot have argued that morphe should be understood in the Aristotelean sense of "essential nature", but more recent scholarship by Robert B. Strimple and Paul D. Feinberg has questioned whether a first century Jewish author would have had Aristotelean philosophy in mind, preferring instead the plainer translation of the word morphe as simply "appearance". In this view, the text does not state that Jesus is God, but merely that he had the appearance of a god (v. 6) but was revealed to be a man (v. 8). Strimple writes, "For years I tried to maintain the view of Lightfoot that Paul here uses morphe with the sense it had acquired in Greek philosophy, particularly Aristotelian... But I have had to conclude that there is really very little evidence to support the conclusion that Paul uses morphe in such a philosophical sense here."[46] Likewise, Feinberg cautions, "the attractiveness of the Greek philosophical interpretation of morphe is that it gives the theologian about as strong an affirmation of the deity of Christ as is possible... One must, however, be careful that he does not read his theological convictions into the text when they are not there."[47]

The Greek word harpagmon translated in verse 6 ("Something to be grasped after / exploited") is also a subject of much scholarly debate. If harpagmon is rendered as "something to be exploited," as it is in many Christian Bible translations, then the implication is that Christ was already equal to God prior to his incarnation. But Bart Ehrman and others have argued that the correct translation is in fact "something to be grasped after," implying that Jesus was not equal to God before his resurrection. Outside of this passage, harpagmon and related words were almost always used to refer to something that a person doesn't yet possess but tries to acquire.[42]

Following this interpretation of harpagmon, scholars such as James D.G. Dunn and Oscar Cullman suggest the author may be drawing a parallel between Adam and Jesus, who in other Pauline literature is called the Last Adam. The first Adam was made in the "image of God" (Genesis 1:26) but sinned by trying to grasp equality with God (Genesis 3:5). In contrast, Jesus, also made in the image of God (Phil. 2:5) did not try to grasp equality with God, but instead, humbled himself in obedience to God. Dunn sees the hymn as an archetypal parallel to Genesis: "The Philippians hymn is an attempt to read the life and work of Christ through the grid of Adam theology... the hymn is the epochal significance of the Christ-event, as determinative for humankind as the 'event' of Adam's creation and fall... Christ by his life, death, and resurrection has so completely reversed the catastrophe of Adam, has done so by the acceptance of death by choice rather than as punishment, as has thus completed the role of dominion over all things originally intended for Adam... It was Adam who was 'in the form of God'... the language was used... to bring out that Adamic character of Christ's life, death, and resurrection. So archetypal was Jesus' work in its effect that it can be described in language appropriate to archetypal man and as a reversal of the archetypal sin."[48]

Similarly, Cullman also notes the parallel between "form of God" in Phil. 2:5 and "image of God" in Genesis 1:26, "The expression morphe firmly establishes the connection between Jesus and the creation story of Adam... this Greek word corresponds to the Hebrew 'image' of Genesis 1:26... morphe in Phil. 2:6 is immediately related to the concept eikon (image) since the Semitic root word or its synonym can correspond to either of the two Greek words. This means that v. 6 does not refer to Jesus' divine 'nature' but rather to the image of God which he possessed from the beginning."[49]

Although scholars remain divided on the question of the pre-existent Christ's equality with God, it is widely agreed by interpreters that the Christ poem depicts Jesus as equal to God after his resurrection. This is because the last two stanzas quote Isaiah 45:22–23:[50] ("Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess"), which in the original context clearly refers to God the Father.[42] Some scholars argue that Philippians 2:6–11 identifies Jesus with God from his pre-existence on the basis that allusions to Isaiah 45:22–23 are present all throughout the poem.[51]

Timothy and Epaphroditus, Paul's go-betweens (2:19–30)

Two of Paul's helpers, Timothy and Epaphroditus, are introduced and the reasons for their journey are explained in this part, mainly to show Paul's affection for the people of Philippi.[52]

3:1-4:1

In Chapter 3 (Letter C), Paul warns the Philippians about those Christians who insist that circumcision is necessary for salvation. He testifies that while he once was a devout Pharisee and follower of the Jewish law, he now considers these things to be worthless and worldly compared to the gospel of Jesus.[53]

Paul's re-evaluation of values through Christ (3:1–11)

Paul tells his own story and says how he "emptied himself" for Christ's sake and how his ultimate goal was now to follow the "upward call of God" (verse 14) to the end. Paul describes how his values had changed since becoming a follower of Christ. Jesuit theologian Robert Murray describes this process as a "transvaluation of values", using a phrase adopted from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche.[52]

Verse 3 is translated:

For we are the circumcision, who worship God in the Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh,[54]

Verse 3:5 is translated:

circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee;[56]

Verse 3:8 is translated:

Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ[58]
  • "I count all things loss": in comparison to knowing Christ, anything else falls short.[59]
  • "The excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus": is not meant subjectively about the knowledge "in Christ" or "about Christ" (as God or as man), but objectively, knowing him in person, as God of all, mainly as "Savior and Redeemer", as Paul emphasizes using the words, "my Lord".[59] The knowledge is attained, not by natural enlightenment, nor by reasoning, nor by the law of Moses, but by the Gospel of the grace of God.[59] The efficient cause of this knowledge is God the Father, the Son, and the Spirit; the Father reveals Christ to his followers; the Son gives them an understanding to know him; and the Spirit gives wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him.[59] This spiritual knowledge of Christ is more excellent than a knowledge of Christ as human, as the knowledge of Christ from the Gospel is also more excellent than that of the legal dispensation, by promises, prophecies, and the ceremonial law.[59]
  • "For whom I have suffered the loss of all things": Paul dropped all confidence in his bodily privileges, civil, ceremonial, and moral righteousness, for Christ and his righteousness; losing his own good name and reputation among men, suffering many kinds of persecutions, losing the comforts of life, often in cold or nakedness, in hunger or thirst, even being ready to lose his own life for professing and preaching Christ.[59]
  • "Count them as rubbish" (KJV: "dung"): or "dog's meat" (Philippians 3:2), what is only fit for dogs; that is, Paul treats as "worthless" his pedigree, religion sect, and moral righteousness before and after conversion; and everything material that he owns, same as what the early church held, considering its own righteousness as "filthy rags".[59]
  • "That I may gain Christ": not just get "an interest in him", as this he knew he had already, and should never lose it, for it commenced from all eternity and cannot be obtained by good works, nor repentance, nor faith, but is freely given.[59] Paul wishes that he might gain a larger knowledge of Christ, without care what pains he took, what expenses he was at, nor what loss he sustained or already suffered for what he regards precious, even willing to lose more, for more of this knowledge (cf. Philippians 3:10), because then he gain more with Christ as a "justifying righteousness": acceptance with God, pardon, life, peace, grace, and glory.[59]

Citizens of earth and heaven (3:17–4:1)

Translator J. B. Phillips,[60] commentator Robert Murray, the New Revised Standard Version and the Jerusalem Bible connect verse 1 with the final section of the previous chapter, as the conclusion of Paul's main exhortations in chapters 2 and 3.[61] Commentator Joseph Benson says "certainly it should not have been separated" from chapter 3.[62]

Paul argues that it is right to be good citizens, but "our citizenship (politeuma) is in heaven".[63] The section calls on the Philippians to be co-imitators of himself; the Greek word συμμιμηταί (summimetai) is "not elsewhere preserved".[64]

4:2-4:23

In Chapter 4, Paul urges the Philippians to resolve conflicts within their fellowship.[65] In the latter part of the chapter (Letter A), Paul expresses his gratitude for the gifts that the Philippians had sent him, and assures them that God will reward them for their generosity.[66]

Throughout the epistle there is a sense of optimism. Paul is hopeful that he will be released, and on this basis he promises to send Timothy to the Philippians for ministry,[67] and also expects to pay them a personal visit.[68]

Last appeal for harmony (4:2–3)

Paul asks the two diakonoiEuodia and Syntyche, female leaders of different house-groups in Philippi, "to be of the same mind" (to think, phronein, "the same").[61]

Verse 4:3 is translated:

And I urge you also, true companion, help these women who laboured with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the Book of Life.[69]

Paul addresses one of the leaders responsible for the church.[70] Benson suggests he is probably addressing Silas, "for Silas had been his yoke-fellow at the very place".[62]

Last call to joy, peace, and right thinking in Christ (4:4–9)

According to Paul, the cure of the troubles in the church is to recall "the charismatic joy of their first coming to faith", just as he told the Thessalonian church that "in spite of persecutions you received the word with joy inspired by the Holy Spirit" (1 Thessalonians 1:6).[61]

Paul's attitude to gifts received and last greetings (4:10–23)

[edit]

Paul acknowledges the support from the church in Philippi, describing it as "a sacrifice pleasing to God", and prays that God will take care of their needs, before closing the epistle with a mention of "Caesar's household" ("the emperor's household") in verse 22, probably as a hint (cf. Philippians 1:13) of the success Paul in obtaining Praetorian contacts.[71]

Verse 4:13 is given in the New King James Version:

I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.[72]

The Greek word Χριστῷ (Christō, "Christ") is found in the majority[73] of older manuscripts,[74] but others lack explicit reference, so are rendered as "him".[75]

Uses

Portions of Philippians are used in various Christian lectionaries for regularly scheduled Bible readings.

"Philippians 3:20-21" is a song title in the album "The Life of the World to Come" inspired by these verses that was released by the American band The Mountain Goats in 2009.[76]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The book is sometimes called the Letter of Paul to the Philippians, or simply Philippians.[1] It is most commonly abbreviated as "Phil."[2]

References

  1. ^ ESV Pew Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 2018. p. 980. ISBN 978-1-4335-6343-0Archived from the original on June 3, 2021.
  2. ^ "Bible Book Abbreviations"Logos Bible SoftwareArchived from the original on April 21, 2022. Retrieved April 21, 2022.
  3. ^ Phil 1:1
  4. ^ Acts 16:20
  5. Jump up to:a b Hansen, Walter (2009). The Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-84474-403-9.
  6. Jump up to:a b c d e Sellew, Philip (January 1994). ""Laodiceans" and the Philippians Fragments Hypothesis". Harvard Theological Review87 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1017/S0017816000031618JSTOR 1509846S2CID 163252743.
  7. ^ Harris, Stephen L., Understanding the Bible. Palo Alto: Mayfield. 1985.
  8. ^ Phil 4:17
  9. ^ Bird, Michael F.; Gupta, Nijay K. (2020). Philippians. New Cambridge Bible Commentary. Cambridge University Press. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-108-47388-0.
  10. ^ Phil 1:7,13
  11. ^ Acts 28:30–31
  12. ^ Acts 23–26
  13. ^ Hornik, Heidi J.; Parsons, Mikeal C. (2017). The Acts of the Apostles through the centuries (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 9781118597873. In the words of Hornik and Parsons, "Acts must be carefully sifted and mined for historical information." (pg. 10)
  14. ^ Clement of Rome (late 1st century) makes a reference to the ministry of Paul after the end of Acts. Clement, To the Corinthians, 5. In J. B. Lightfoot (ed), The Apostolic Fathers (Michigan: Baker Book House, 1978) 15. The author of the Muratorian Canon (late 2nd century) says that Luke recorded mostly that which he himself witnessed and therefore that is why he did not include ‘the journey of Paul, when he went from the city – Rome – to Spain.’ The Muratoriun Canon. 2. The apocryphal Acts of Peter makes reference to the tradition that Paul reached Spain. Paul is described in prison in Rome, receiving a vision from God that he would go to Spain. Acts of Peter, Verscelli Acts 1 and 3. Eusebius (early 300’s) recorded that Paul did more ministry after his first jail time in Rome. Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, II, 22, 1–8, in Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (editors), A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church 2nd series. Vol.1. Eusebius: Church History, Life of Constantine the Great, and Oration in Praise of Constantine (Edinburgh: Eerdmans, 1997) 124–125.
  15. ^ Jim Reiher, “Could Philippians have been written from the Second Roman Imprisonment?” Evangelical Quarterly. Vol. LXXXIV. No. 3 July 2012. pp. 213–233. This article summarises the other theories, and offers examples of different scholars who adhere to different theories, but presents a different option for consideration.
  16. ^ Comfort, Philip W.; David P. Barrett (2001). The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts. Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers. p. 93. ISBN 978-0-8423-5265-9.
  17. ^ Nestle-Aland, Novum Testamentum GraeceDeutsche Bibelgesellschaft, p. 610.
  18. ^ "11. Philippians: Introduction, Argument, and Outline"Bible.org.
  19. ^ Phil 1:18b–26
  20. ^ Phil 2:14–18
  21. ^ Phil 1:12–15
  22. ^ Phil 2:25–30
  23. ^ Phil 2:26–27
  24. ^ Murray 2007, p. 1179.
  25. ^ Philippians 1:1 NKJV
  26. ^ "Overseers" in the New International Version and Darby Translation; "helpers" in the Good News Translation
  27. Jump up to:a b c Coogan 2007, p. 329 New Testament.
  28. ^ Philippians 1:2 NKJV
  29. ^ Moule, H. C. G.Cambridge Bible for Schools and CollegesPhilippians 1. Accessed 28 April 2019
  30. Jump up to:a b Murray 2007, p. 1181.
  31. ^ Bengel, J. A., Bengel's Gnomon of the New Testament on Philippians 1, accessed 8 June 2020
  32. ^ 1 Thessalonians 5:16–18
  33. ^ Murray 2007, p. 1182.
  34. ^ Philippians 1:21 NKJV
  35. ^ John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible, - Philippians 1:21
  36. ^ Murray 2007, p. 1183.
  37. Jump up to:a b Meyer, H. A. W. (1880), Meyer's NT Commentary on Philippians 2, translated from the German sixth edition, accessed 1 June 2020
  38. ^ Philippians 2:1: King James Version
  39. ^ See the Douay-Rheims translation of that year, accessed 1 October 2023
  40. ^ Moule, H. C. G. (1898), Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges on Philippians 2, accessed 1 October 2023
  41. ^ Philippians 2:1: NIV
  42. Jump up to:a b c d e Ehrman, Bart D. (2014). "7. Jesus as God on Earth: Early Incarnation Christologies". How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee. HarperOne. ISBN 978-0-0617-7819-3.
  43. ^ Murray, Robert, SJ (2007). "69. Philippians". In Barton, John; Muddiman, John (eds.). The Oxford Bible Commentary (first (paperback) ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 1180. ISBN 978-0199277186. Retrieved February 6, 2019.
  44. ^ "Frankfurt silver inscription" – Oldest Christian testimony found north of the AlpsGoethe University Frankfurt, 12 December 2024, retrieved 13 December 2024
  45. ^ Martin, Ralph P. (1997). Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation & in the Setting of Early Christian Worship (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press. pp. vii–ix. ISBN 0-8308-1894-4.
  46. ^ Strimple, Robert B. (1978). "Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Studies: Some Exegetical Conclusions". Westminster Theological Journal41247–68.
  47. ^ Feinberg, Paul D. (1980). "The Kenosis and Christology: An Exegetical-Theological Analysis of Phil. 2:6–11". Trinity Journal121–46.
  48. ^ Dunn, James D.G. (1980). Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation (2nd ed.). London: SCM Press Ltd. pp. xix, 120. ISBN 9780802842572.
  49. ^ Cullman, Oscar (1959). The Christology of the New Testament (Revised ed.). Philadelphia: The Westminster Press. p. 176. ISBN 9780664243517.
  50. ^ Isaiah 45:22–23
  51. ^ Hill, Wesley (2015). Paul and the Trinity: Persons, Relations, and the Pauline Letters. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-8028-6964-7.
  52. Jump up to:a b Murray 2007, p. 1187.
  53. ^ Phil 3:2–10
  54. ^ Philippians 3:3 NKJV
  55. ^ Exell, Joseph S.; Spence-Jones, Henry Donald Maurice (Editors). On "Philippians 3". In: The Pulpit Commentary. 23 volumes. First publication: 1890. Accessed 24 April 2019.
  56. ^ Philippians 3:5 NKJV
  57. Jump up to:a b Cambridge Bible for Schools and CollegesPhilippians 3. Accessed 28 April 2019.
  58. ^ Philippians 3:8 NKJV
  59. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible, - Philippians 3:8
  60. ^ Philippians 4:1: J.B. Phillips New Testament
  61. Jump up to:a b c Murray 2007, p. 1189.
  62. Jump up to:a b Benson, J., Benson Commentary on Philippians 1, accessed 14 June 2020
  63. ^ Murray 2007, pp. 1188–1189.
  64. ^ Philippians 3:17, "imitators together" in the American Standard Version; "co-imitators" is from the English translation of Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer's NT Commentary on Philippians 3 (1880)
  65. ^ Phil 4:2–3
  66. ^ Phil 4:15–20
  67. ^ Phil 2:19–23
  68. ^ Phil 2:24
  69. ^ Philippians 4:3
  70. ^ La Bible du Semeur, footnote b at Philippians 4:3
  71. ^ Murray 2007, p. 1190.
  72. ^ Philippians 4:13 NKJV
  73. ^ Note [b] on Philippians 4:13 in NET Bible
  74. ^ אD2 [F GΨ 075 1175 1241 1505 1881 2464 M al sy Hier
  75. ^ אA B DI 33 1739 lat co Cl
  76. ^ Strain, Lauren (2009-10-06). "The Mountain Goats - The Life of the World to Come / Releases / Releases // Drowned In Sound". Drownedinsound.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-14. Retrieved 2012-02-28.

Sources

Further reading

  • Abrahamsen, Valerie (March 1988). "Christianity and the Rock Reliefs at Philippi". Biblical Archaeologist51 (1): 46–56. doi:10.2307/3210038JSTOR 3210038S2CID 195040919.
  • Barclay, William. 1975. The Letters to the Philippians, Colossians, and Thessalonians. Rev. ed. Daily Bible Study Series. Louisville, Ky.: Westminster.
  • Barnes, Albert. 1949. Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians. Enlarged type edition. Edited by Robert Frew. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker.
  • Black, David A. 1995. "The Discourse Structure of Philippians: A Study in Textlinquistics." Novum Testamentum 37.1 (Jan.): 16–49
  • Blevins, James L. 1980. "Introduction to Philippians." Review and Expositor 77 (Sum.): 311–325.
  • Brooks, James A. 1980. "Introduction to Philippians." Southwestern Journal of Theology 23.1 (Fall): 7–54.
  • Bruce, Frederick F. 1989. Philippians. New International Biblical Commentary. New Testament Series. Edited by W. Ward Gasque. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2002.
  • Burton, Ernest De Witt. 1896. "The Epistles of the Imprisonment." Biblical World 7.1: 46–56.
  • Elkins, Garland. 1976. "The Living Message of Philippians." pp. 171–180 in The Living Messages of the Books of the New Testament. Edited by Garland Elkins and Thomas B. Warren. Jonesboro, Ark.: National Christian.
  • Garland, David E. 1985. "The Composition and Unity of Philippians: Some Neglected Literary Factors." Novum Testamentum 27.2 (April): 141–173.
  • Hagelberg, Dave. 2007. Philippians: An Ancient Thank You Letter – A Study of Paul and His Ministry Partners' Relationship. English ed. Metro Manila: Philippine Challenge.
  • Hawthorne, Gerald F. 1983. Philippians. Word Biblical Commentary 43. Edited by Bruce Metzger. Nashville, Tenn.: Nelson.
  • Herrick, Greg. "Introduction, Background, and Outline to Philippians." Bible.org.
  • Jackson, Wayne. 1987. The Book of Philippians: A Grammatical and Practical Study. Abilene, Tex.: Quality.
  • Kennedy, H. A. A. 1900. "The Epistle to the Philippians." Expositor's Greek Testament. Vol. 3. Edited by W. Robertson Nicoll. New York, NY: Doran.
  • Lenski, Richard C. H. 1937. The Interpretation of St. Paul's Epistles to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, and to the Philippians. Repr. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2001.
  • Lipscomb, David and J.W. Shepherd. 1968. Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians. Rev. ed. Edited by J.W. Shepherd. Gospel Advocated Commentary. Nashville, Tenn.: Gospel Advocate.
  • Llewelyn, Stephen R. 1995. "Sending Letters in the Ancient World: Paul and the Philippians." Tyndale Bulletin 46.2: 337–356.
  • Mackay, B. S. 1961. "Further Thoughts on Philippians." New Testament Studies 7.2 (Jan.): 161–170.
  • Martin, Ralph P. 1959. The Epistle of Paul to the Philippians. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. Ed. By R.V.G. Tasker. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1977.
  • Martin, Ralph P. 1976. Philippians. New Century Bible Commentary. New Testament. Edited by Matthew Black. Repr. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans.
  • McAlister, Bryan. 2011. "Introduction to Philippians: Mindful of How We Fill Our Minds." Gospel Advocate 153.9 (Sept.): 12–13
  • Mule, D. S. M. (1981). The Letter to the Philippians. Cook Book House.
  • Müller, Jacobus J. 1955. The Epistle of Paul to the Philippians. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Ed. By Frederick F. Bruce. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1991.
  • Pelaez, I. N. (1970). Epistle on the Philippians. Angel & Water;reprint, Angels new books, ed. Michael Angelo. (1987). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
  • Dictionary of Paul and His Letters, s.v. "Philippians, Letter to the"
  • Reicke, Bo. 1970. "Caesarea, Rome, and the Captivity Epistles." pp. 277–286 in Apostolic History and the Gospel: Biblical and Historical Essays Presented to F. F. Bruce. Edited by W. Ward Gasque and Ralph P. Martin. Exeter: Paternoster Press.
  • Roper, David. 2003. "Philippians: Rejoicing in Christ." BibleCourses.com. Accessed: 3 Sept. 2011.
  • Russell, Ronald. 1982. "Pauline Letter Structure in Philippians." Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 25.3 (Sept.): 295–306.
  • Sanders, Ed. 1987. "Philippians." pp. 331–339 in New Testament Survey. Edited by Don Shackelford. Searcy, Ark.: Harding University.
  • Sergio Rosell Nebreda, Christ Identity: A Social-Scientific Reading of Philippians 2.5–11 (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2011) (Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments, 240).
  • Swift, Robert C. 1984. "The Theme and Structure of Philippians." Bibliotheca Sacra 141 (July): 234–254.
  • Synge, F.C. 1951. Philippians and Colossians. Torch Bible Commentaries. Edited by John Marsh, David M. Paton, and Alan Richardson. London: SCM, 1958.
  • Thielman, Frank. 1995. Philippians. NIV Application Commentary. General Editor. Terry Muck. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan.
  • Vincent, Marvin R. 1897. The Epistle to the Philippians and to Philemon. International Critical Commentary. Ed. By Samuel R. Driver, Alfred Plummer, Charles A. Briggs. Edinburgh: Clark, 1902.
  • Vincent, Marvin R. Vincent's Word Studies in the New Testament. 4 vols. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, n.d.
  • Wallace, Daniel B. "Philippians: Introductions, Argument, and Outline." Bible.org.
  • Walvoord, John F. 1971. Philippians: Triumph in Christ. Everyman's Bible Commentary. Chicago, Ill.: Moody.

Online translations of the Epistle to the Philippians:

Online Study of Philippians:

Related articles: