Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Showing posts with label Gay Rights and Marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gay Rights and Marriage. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2025

Choosing Post-Evangelical Theology: Moving Towards a Relational, Open, and Healing Theology of Faith and Love



A Theology of Love

Choosing Post-Evangelical Theology:
Moving Towards a Relational, Open, and
Healing Theology of Faith and Love

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5


✍️ Preface: A Love That Rewrites the Story

For many of us raised within evangelicalism, theology was taught as something fixed, something we inherited rather than questioned — a set of guarded truths rather than a living conversation with a hurting world. Evangelical theology, as it took root in the 20th century, often placed its energy in drawing lines rather than building bridges: lines against contemporary science, lines against evolution, lines against non-heteronormative identities, lines against other faith traditions, and even lines within Christianity itself.

I, too, inherited those lines.

But over time, the gaps became unsustainable, even unbearable. Those lines were not just drawn on paper; they were drawn through lives to cross-out lives. They created exclusions that harmed and wounded; doctrines that threatened of hell more than they promised healing hope; they created rigid systems that excluded unwanteds; and silenced love when love did not fit their terms and beliefs.

Then one day I discovered a new theology, a new and gracious vocabulary — one based upon a living and relational philosophy: process thought. It offered a cosmology where God is not distant but present in every becoming; not coercive but persuasive; not static but alive. It gave language to what I had felt all along: that love is not merely a command but the very structure of divine reality.

This newer theology does not attempt to “save” evangelicalism. It seeks to transcend and transform theologies of unlove and exclusion — to offer something truer, wider, more humane. A theology centered not on control but on mutual becoming; not on fear but on love.

This “Healing Theology of Love” is both a response to harm Christians have created over the centuries as well as a vision for the future. It is rooted in process philosophy, (open and relational) process theology, and the conviction that love must be the first and last word, the alpha and omega, in every theological reflection - if not the very hermeneutical driver/life of the bible itself.

It is also a theology that refuses to leave behind those the old systems have deemed disposable: transgender and gay people; women who have been sidelined; minorities and racialized communities; those abused within rigid dogmatic systems (such as the Nones and Dones); and the ailing, compromised earth itself (theo-ecology).

This is, in short, a theology which dares to love without apology across all boundaries the church has constructed, maintained, and defined as the gospel of Jesus Christ.


🌿 Introduction: Healing Theology

What we wish to do as Christians of the 21st Century is not simply write a new theology but a healing theology. By taking a faith that has too often been used as a weapon — shaped by fear, control, and exclusion — and re-grounding it in love as hermeneutic and relationship as an ontology. That is no small task.

The work of this website reflects a larger movement many thoughtful people are experiencing and putting into effect today — a quiet, inclusive, challenging revolution of faith. It requires:

  • Leaving static, brittle, evangelical frameworks that deny complexity and difference;

  • Discovering process thought with its dynamic vision of a relational God, open co-creation, evolving (cosmic) meaning, and a cosmos alive with possibility and co-generation; and,

  • Reimagining a faith that liberates rather than imprisons; that welcomes science rather than fears it; that embraces human diversity as part of the divine flow rather than a deviation from it.

This kind of theological turning is not about rejecting faithbut deepening faith. It’s a movement from:

  • Judgment ➝ Hospitality

  • Certainty ➝ Openness

  • Hierarchy ➝ Mutuality

  • Fear of difference ➝ Reverence for multiplicity

A hermeneutic of love does something evangelical literalism could never do well: it listens  by teaching itself to unlearn and relearn before it judges. It understands Scripture as a living conversation, not a frozen codebook. It makes room for transgender people, for evolution, for science, for societal and religious pluralism — and for grace to be larger than human boundaries.

In Whiteheadian terms, this is picturing theology as “an adventure of ideas” — it is co-creative, participative, emergent, ever widening, and centered in transformative value. In Christian terms, it is a theology which takes the Incarnation of Christ very seriously: that divine love is-and-can-be embodied, relational, and present in the legitimacy of our becoming.

This post-evangelical project stands in a long and courageous lineage of reformers to the Christian faith. In the contemporary era, Process thinkers are walking in the paths shared with many of the great transformative theologians of the last century — Tillich, Cobb, Keller, Suchocki, Cone, Moltmann, and others — but we are doing so in a post-evangelical and processual context, one of the most critical theological terrains of the 21st century.

This is the hard and holy work of turning faith from fortress ideology to Eucharistic (table) communion/fellowship. It is the transformative choice (among other elections) to center transgender dignity, human diversity, and the ethics of love into the heart of this post-theological re-visioning making it not only potent, but profoundly future-facing.

“Love is the greatest hermeneutic because love doesn’t ask, ‘Is this correct?’
Love asks, ‘Who is being welcomed, embraced, healed, or harmed?’

This Theology of Love seeks to be structured, layered, historically informed, and open to the pluriverse of human and cosmic experience. It is an architecture built not on fear, but on the most enduring foundation of all: Love.


Transition: From Healing to Building

Every movement of reimagining requires not only courage but structure. Healing theology is not simply about unlearning the harmful; it is also about building the bountiful, the beautiful. Love is more than a sentiment — it is a framework capable of holding doctrine, ethics, science, embodiment, and hope together.

To move from fortress to table, from boundary to belonging, theology must be architected anew:

  • with love as its hermeneutic (its way of envisioning),

  • with relationship as its ontology (its understanding of being),

  • with justice and dignity as its ethic (its way of valuing),

  • and with a shared, open future as its God-wide, cosmic energy (its way of purpose).

This is not a project of dismantling faith, but of re-centering it in the living heart of Love itself as Jesus had shown the church — it is a theology of love that listens, lures, captivates, motivates, recreates, and transformatively calls forward.

Here, theology ceases to be a system of control and becomes instead a movement of life.

The following five-layer framework offers a way to give this vision shape: not as a rigid system, but as a living architecture — flexible, dynamic, relational, and rooted in divine Love. Each layer builds upon the last, forming a theology capable of embracing plurality without losing its center.


🏛 I. Love as Hermeneutic — The First Principle

“Love must be the lens through which every text, tradition, and theology is interpreted. If a doctrine harms, excludes, or diminishes dignity, it is not of God.”

Evangelical theology often begins with Scripture as the ultimate authority, interpreted through inherited doctrinal grids. But this has too often made Scripture a blunt weapon rather than a living word.

Here, we invert the order. We begin with love as the primary hermeneutic — the interpretive key through which all other theological claims must pass.

Core Claim:

  • Love is the relational force through which God participates in the world.

  • Love is theologically prior to every text, creed, or system imposed by the church.

  • The measure of truth is not how tightly it conforms to tradition, but how deeply it expands dignity and relational flourishing.

Implications:

  • Any biblical interpretation that diminishes human worth is theologically deficient.

  • Theologies built on fear, exclusion, or domination are not neutral — they are deformative.

  • Scripture is read through the grammar of love, not love through the grammar of Scripture.

📌 “Love first” does not negate Scripture. It transfigures how Scripture is read.

This hermeneutic gives you a north star:
Every doctrine must answer this question —

“Does this idea, practice, attitude, or action widen love’s embrace or narrow it?”


🌿 II. Philosophical Ground — A Cosmos of Becoming

Process philosophy provides the ontological scaffolding for this theology. The universe is not a static machine ruled by a distant deity but a living, relational, evolving reality.

Core Concepts:

  1. God as Relational

    • God is not omnipotent in the classical sense but omni-relational: God is present in all experiences, luring each moment toward beauty, harmony, and creative advance.

  2. Reality as Process

    • All things are in a constant state of becoming, not just existing.

    • Each moment emerges from prior moments in a complex network of participatory interdependence.

  3. Love as the Structure of Reality

    • Love is not an attribute added to God; it is the very mode of divine activity.

    • God relates to the world not through control but through persuasive love.

  4. Creativity as Divine Gift

    • Every actual entity participates in the unfolding of creation — a shared, co-generative process.

Why this matters:

Traditional theology often frames God as outside the world, intervening at will. Process theology reframes God as within the world, always in relationship with it. Love is not divine sentiment — it is the energetic patterning of existence itself.

“Love is the grammar of becoming. Everything else is commentary.”


📖 III. Theological Core — God, Scripture, Humanity

Here is where a loving theology can take shape - not as a top-down system of control - but as a web of healing, helping intrapersonal and extrapersonal relationships.

1. God

  • Dipolar in nature: both eternal (the ground of reality's being) and temporal (the cosmic companion of becoming).

  • Not the cosmic puppeteer but the intimate co-creator of life itself.

  • God suffers with creation (immanence); God does not simply rule over creation (transcendence).

  • Divine power is persuasive, not unilaterally coercive.

2. Scripture

  • Is a record of evolving human encounters with God; it is not a closed, infallible codebook for life.

  • Reflects both divine lure, the human experience, and human limitations.

  • To read the bible faithfully is to read it through the hermeneutic of love, sifting out what reflects divine compassion from what reflects human fear, religious imposition, folkloric superstitions, and ancient mythologies. It is a narrative of humanity's spiritual  and religious journey of becoming one in purpose and love with the God of the universe.

3. Humanity

  • Is inherently/intrinsically valuable — every human being participates with God in divine becoming and creativity without exclusion.

  • The "Image of God" is not a fixed form but one of relational capacity.

  • Gays, trans, neurodiverse, disabled, racialized, and marginalized lives are not exceptions to the divine image but reflections of its richness and diversity.

4. Sin

  • Reframed as relational rupture — is any act or system that fractures love and mutual flourishing.

  • Not a legal infraction, but a wound in the relational fabric.

5. Salvation

  • Not rescue from a fallen world, but healing of relational ruptures and participation in the ongoing creation of a more just, loving reality.

  • Found not in exclusion but in communion's diverse fellowship.

📌 This theological core is where the post-evangelical shift becomes structural: It eschews a punitive deity, exclusionary doctrines, and dualistic systems of fear.


🌍 IV. Ethical Outworking — Love as Praxis

Theology that does not touch the ground of our being is not theology; it is an aberrant abstraction and unloving practice. A theology of love must be incarnated in practice.

1. Love as Social Architecture

  • Justice is not separate from love; it is love made public.

  • Inclusion is not charity; it is the test of fidelity to divine love.

2. Communities of Belonging

  • Faith communities must be radically hospitable — especially to those most often harmed: LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, disabled people, racialized communities, the poor, and the earth itself.

  • Love is measured by who is welcomed, not by who is excluded.

3. Nonviolence as Ethical Posture

  • Divine love persuades, it never coerces. Our ethical posture mirrors that persuasion.

  • Political, social, and religious systems that depend on fear and control are counter-testimonies.

4. Ecological Love

  • Creation is not a backdrop to salvation history — it is part of it.

  • Environmental justice is a theological act, not an optional extra.

📌 In short: Love is praxis. If it does not act, it is not love.


🕊 V. Eschatological Vision — Hope as an Expanding Horizon

Evangelical eschatology often narrows hope to “who goes to heaven.” A theology of love widens it to the entirety of the cosmos.

1. The Future Is Open

  • God does not control the future but calls creation toward it.

  • Eschatology is relational, participatory, and creative.

2. Love as the Arc of History

  • Love is not a fragile feeling but a cosmic trajectory: from fragmentation to integration, from domination to mutuality.

3. Salvation History as Transformation

  • Hope is found not in escape but in the transfiguration of creation through ongoing acts of love.

4. Co-creating the Future

  • Humans are not passive recipients of divine will but partners in shaping the world.

  • This includes political, ecological, social, and spiritual dimensions.

📌 Love gives us an eschatology big enough for everyone.


✨ Conclusion: Theology "in the Key of Love"

What began for me as an act of deconstruction became something far more: a personal reconstruction of Christianity radically rooted in love. Process philosophy gave me the language of becoming; the gospel gave me the vision of incarnational love. Together, they form a theology capable of holding science, difference, embodiment, and hope.

This is not a theology for a church fortress.
It’s a theology for a shared table.

“Love is the truest hermeneutic,
the strongest ethic,
the most enduring hope.”

In this theology:

  • God is love — relational, evolving, ever-present.

  • Scripture is a living witness to love’s unfolding.

  • Humanity is co-creative, diverse, and sacred.

  • Justice is love’s non-oppressive, public face.

  • The future is open and can be made more beautiful by our participation in love’s work. When we withdraw from this attitude we allow harm and suffering to go forward as we are witnessing today under "maga" influences.

This is the story we can choose to live into. Not as a reaction to fear, but as a reorientation toward life.


🪶Below is a prayer, a manifesto, or an invocation that may be used at the beginning of any invocation, in public gatherings, worship settings, or essays. This text can be used as a responsive reading for congregations, a poetic preface for a manuscript, or a closing litany in public presentations or services. The language is intentionally layered — accessible, resonant, and theologically rich.


🕊️ Invocation: A Theology of Love

Leader: In the beginning, before all words, there was Love.
All: And Love is still the first word.

I believe in Love —
not as ornament, but as origin.
Love is the lens, the language, the living breath.
What does not widen Love’s embrace
cannot bear the name of God.

I believe in a world alive with becoming,
where each heartbeat, each star, each whisper of wind
is woven in a living tapestry of relationship.
Love is not an afterthought —
it is the deep structure of reality.

I believe in a God who does not coerce but companions,
whose power is persuasion,
whose nature is relationship,
whose name is Love.
Scripture is not a cage but a conversation —
a record of humanity’s trembling encounters
with a Love too vast to be contained.

I believe every human being
is made of sacred becoming —
trans, cis, gay, straight, disabled, neurodiverse,
Black, Brown, White, Indigenous —
each a reflection of Love’s unending creativity.
Sin is not a stain but a rupture,
and salvation is the healing of the wound.

I believe Love builds tables, not walls.
It has hands that welcome,
feet that march for justice,
arms that lift the fallen,
and eyes that see what fear refuses to look at.
Justice is Love speaking in public.
Hospitality is Love made flesh.

I believe the future is not closed but open,
an ever-widening horizon of holy possibility.
Love lures us forward, never forcing, always inviting.
Hope is not wishful thinking —
it is Love dreaming the world toward beauty.

And so we confess with heart and breath:

  Love before all things,
  Love within all things,
  Love beyond all things.
  
  Love listens.
  Love interprets.
  Love heals.
  Love creates.

Leader: In the end, as in the beginning, there is Love.
All: And Love shall have the final word.

R.E. Slater
October 14, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved

Sunday, October 12, 2025

Disturbing the Theological Certainties of Anti-LGBTQ Biblical Literalism



Holiness Without Love
Is No Holiness at All

Disturbing the Theological Certainties
of Anti-LGBTQ Biblical Literalism

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

© R.E. Slater
A Companion Essay to “Transgender Identity:
© R.E. Slater - All rights reserved.


✍️ Preface: When Holiness Becomes a Wall

Across the contemporary landscape of the Christian church, a deep fracture has widened — one between those who believe Scripture must remain untouched by modern insight and those who believe love must remain the measure of truth. In this fracture, countless lives — especially those of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people — have been caught, bruised, and exiled.

This essay is written as an act of conscience and hope: not to destroy the Bible’s authority, but to reclaim its heart from those who have used the bible to wound and harm others.

In many churches today, holiness has been weaponized — it has been turned from a symbol of divine compassion into a border of purity and fear. The phrase “love the sinner, hate the sin” has become a moral shield for cruelty. Beneath its piety lies a refusal to see others as equals in divine dignity.

The first purpose of this essay, then, is humanistic: to defend the psychological, legal, and moral worth of LGBTQ+ people against doctrines that deny their humanity. It is written from the conviction that human dignity precedes theology, that love cannot be postponed until the church feels ready to extend it, and that holiness divorced from empathy is not holy at all.

But the second purpose is theological — to reveal that love is not the opposite of holiness, but its truest expression because it is it's truest foundation. From a process-theological view, the divine is not an unmoved judge but a living presence within all relational becoming, luring creation toward deeper compassion and harmony. Every act of love widens that divine movement; every act of rejection resists it.

> To affirm LGBTQ+ dignity is not to betray God, but to participate in God’s ongoing creation.

> To cling to exclusion in God’s name is not holiness — it is idolatry.


I. The False Binary of “Holiness vs. Love”

Evangelical theology often insists that love without moral purity is sentimentalism, while holiness without compromise is virtue. This logic divides God into parts — as though the divine could be loving or holy, but not both at once.

In the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures, love is the essence of holiness. The prophets repeatedly define holiness not by separation from sinners but by justice, mercy, and care for the oppressed.

“Is not this the fast that I choose: to loose the bonds of wickedness, to undo the straps of the yoke, to let the oppressed go free?” — Isaiah 58:6

Jesus, in turn, lived a holiness that touched what was forbidden — the bleeding woman, the Samaritan, the tax collector, the leper, and yes, the sexual and social outcast. He did not preserve purity; he embodied love.

To call queer and trans lives “unholy” is not to protect divine truth — it is to invert the gospel.

Love that heals and includes is the holiness of God.


II. Literalism as Idolatry

Biblical literalism is not ancient; it is modern and manufactured. It arose in the 19th century as a reaction to scientific discovery, biblical scholarship, and cultural change. It claims divine certainty while practicing human fear.

Literalists read the Bible not as a dynamic witness to evolving revelation, but as a static codebook. They cherry-pick verses that reinforce hierarchy while ignoring those that subvert it. Leviticus 18 becomes sacred law, but Leviticus 19’s call to economic justice and love of neighbor becomes “cultural.”

Literalism’s true danger is not ignorance — it is idolatry. It makes an idol of the text and calls it God.

“If your reading of Scripture cannot grow in love, it has ceased to be a living word and has become a graven image.”

Faith is not fidelity to words frozen in time; it is fidelity to the divine life still unfolding through them.


III. Recovering the Inclusive Scripture We Lost

The exclusion of LGBTQ+ people rests on selective blindness. The Bible, read through lenses of purity, looks narrow. Read through lenses of love, it is expansive and alive.

Consider the eunuchs — gender-diverse people of antiquity who appear repeatedly in Scripture:

  • In Isaiah 56, God promises that eunuchs who keep the covenant will receive “a name better than sons and daughters.”

  • Jesus acknowledges them in Matthew 19:12, implicitly honoring those whose bodies and lives defied social norms.

  • Philip baptizes an Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 — an outsider made the first non-Jewish Christian convert.

These stories were not accidents; they were early affirmations of gender variance as compatible with divine calling.

And Paul’s proclamation — “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28) — is a cosmic abolition of exclusion, a declaration that divine relationship transcends every human division.

The inclusive heart of the gospel is not an innovation of modern liberalism; it is its original pulse.


IV. When “Holiness” Masks Power

In every era, religion has sanctified control. Under “holiness,” churches have justified slavery, racial segregation, patriarchy, and colonialism. Today, anti-LGBTQ theologies are simply the latest form of that pattern — holiness used as an unholy fortress for power.

This dynamic is not new. Jesus confronted it in his own day:

“You tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on the shoulders of others, but you yourselves are unwilling to lift a finger.” — Matthew 23:4

  • The holiness of the Pharisees was separation. The holiness of Jesus was solidarity.
  • The holiness of empire is dominance. The holiness of love is liberation.

The “holy” condemnation of queer and trans people is thus not holiness at all; it is empire theology dressed in sacred language.


V. The Living Law of Love

In Mark 2:27, Jesus reinterprets Torah itself:

“The Sabbath was made for humankind, not humankind for the Sabbath.”

Law exists to serve life, not the other way around.

When a biblical teaching harms, silences, or drives people to despair, the problem is not the person — it is the interpretation. The Spirit that animated Scripture still speaks, and its voice sounds like love.

“You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life, but it is they that testify on my behalf.” — John 5:39–40

Love is not optional or secondary. It is the hermeneutic key by which all Scripture must be read. Any doctrine that destroys the beloved is unfaithful to Christ.


VI. The Cost of Bad Theology

The damage of exclusionary theology is measurable and devastating:

  • LGBTQ+ youth who grow up in churches which reject them face exponentially higher suicide risk.

  • Families are torn apart by shame disguised as righteousness.

  • Communities become echo chambers of fear rather than compassion.

  • The moral credibility of Christianity collapses before a watching world.

  • Every sermon that condemns queer and trans lives wounds the body of Christ itself.

A faith that drives people to despair cannot be holy.
A church that exiles its children cannot be the family of God.

Bad theology kills. But good theology heals. And good theology always begins in love.


VII. The Idolatry of Certainty

Literalism masquerades as faith, but it is fear: the fear that if our interpretations change, God will change with them — and we will lose both God, self, and faith.

But the living God is change — not chaos, but creative transformation. Process theology reminds us that God is not an unmoved mover but a co-suffering companion, feeling with the world, evolving with its pain and joy.

To cling to certainty is to cling to control. But to let love lead is to trust the living God more than our frozen doctrines.

“When your faith can no longer grow, it is not faith but nostalgia.”

The church’s nostalgia for a perfect, unchanging moral order is a denial of the Spirit’s motion in time.


VIII. A Better Vision: Holiness as Relationship

What would it look like for holiness to be redefined not as moral separation but as relational integrity — the fullness of right relationship between God, self, and others?

In that vision:

  • Holiness is compassion lived courageously.

  • Love is justice embodied in relationship.

  • Faith is trust in divine becoming, not retreat into divine distance.

The holiness of Christ is not purity of separation but presence in love.

The holiness of the Spirit is not rigidity but renewal.

The holiness of the Creator is not judgment but the perpetual invitation to co-create a better world.

When churches learn this, they will finally become what they claim to be — communities of grace, not gatekeepers of fear.


IX. The Theological Core

God is not the guardian of our exclusions. God is the relentless presence within what we have excluded.

God’s holiness is not about keeping the unworthy out; it is about bringing the rejected home. Wherever human beings have drawn lines in the name of purity, God has crossed them in the name of love.


X. Conclusion: The Door in the Wall

When Jesus stood at the margins, it was not because he despised the center. It was because God dwells where love is most needed.

The church has chosen the center for too long.
Holiness has become a wall.
Love must make "holiness" a living, loving door.

May this essay disturb the certainties of those who mistake fear for faith and purity for holiness.

May it awaken in us the courage to read Scripture as a living word, to see love as the final law, and to welcome every human being as a bearer of divine image.

For holiness without love is no holiness at all —
it is merely pride in religious disguise.


Below are the drafts for Appendix A (Robert S. Smith) and Appendix B (Gospel Coalition & Similar Movements). Both are structured to parallel the tone of the main essay: thoughtful, firm, and theologically articulate — not reactive or shrill.


Appendix A: Engaging Robert S. Smith’s "The Body God Gives "(2024)

Robert S. Smith’s book The Body God Gives: A Biblical Response to Transgender Theory is one of the more systematic conservative attempts to ground Christian ethics regarding gender in the belief that biological sex determines gender identity. It seeks to provide a “biblical anthropology” to resist what the author perceives as cultural relativism in discussions of gender.

This appendix offers a constructive theological response to the major claims of Smith’s book, showing why such a framework is both biblically limited and theologically harmful, and how a more faithful reading of Scripture and tradition calls us toward love, dignity, and relational holiness.


1. On Biblical Literalism and Hermeneutical Control

Smith’s argument relies on the assumption that the plain reading of Scripture reflects God’s immutable will for gender and sexuality. This assumption:

  • Ignores the historical development of biblical interpretation and the cultural specificity of texts.

  • Fails to recognize that “plain reading” is always an interpreted reading, mediated through modern assumptions.

  • Positions Scripture as a static codebook rather than a living witness to divine revelation.

A process-relational hermeneutic insists that God’s Word must be read through the lens of love and evolving human understanding. Jesus himself reinterpreted Torah in the service of human flourishing (e.g., Mark 2:27), demonstrating that Scripture is meant to serve life, not entomb it.


2. On the “Sexed Body” as Determinative

Smith argues that God created the body as male or female and that this biological sex must ground gender identity. This view collapses:

  • biological sex (a spectrum in reality),

  • gender identity (a psychological and experiential dimension),

  • and gender expression (a cultural and social practice)
    into a single, rigid binary.

This not only contradicts contemporary scientific and psychological understanding, but also flattens the diversity of embodiment reflected across cultures and history (refer to my first essay: Transgender Identity, by re slater)

Biblical narratives themselves include gender-variant figures (e.g., eunuchs), whose inclusion in God’s covenant disrupts simplistic binaries. Isaiah 56, Matthew 19:12, and Acts 8 reveal that God’s covenant expands beyond the body’s assigned social role.


3. On Creation Theology and “God’s Design”

Smith appeals to Genesis 1–2 as proof that male and female are fixed categories representing divine design. But:

  • These texts are mythopoetic, not anatomical manuals.

  • Genesis presents a theological vision of relationality and shared dignity, not a technical blueprint for immutable gender roles.

  • Throughout Scripture, God’s action is characterized by surprising expansions of covenant — Rahab, Ruth, eunuchs, Gentiles, women apostles — not by static enforcement of original categories.

Appeals to “God’s design” often confuse creation order with cultural order, sacralizing human norms rather than divine relational creativity.


4. On the Authority of Experience

Smith downplays transgender experiences as subjective feelings in tension with divine reality. But Christian theology has long recognized that human experience is one locus of revelation (Wesleyan quadrilateral; liberation theology; feminist and womanist theology).

Experience does not overrule Scripture — but neither may Scripture be interpreted against the lived dignity of human beings without betraying its own witness to love and justice.

“Where theology refuses to listen to human pain, it has ceased to speak for God.”


5. On Pastoral Harm and Responsibility

Smith frames his argument as “compassionate,” but the theological system it defends has historically led to:

  • rejection of trans people from churches,

  • spiritual trauma,

  • loss of family, housing, and safety,

  • elevated suicide and mental health crises.

Pastoral compassion without theological transformation is sentimentality. Real compassion demands a rethinking of exclusionary doctrines in light of love, justice, and the evolving understanding of creation.


6. On Love as the Hermeneutic Center

Smith’s framework subordinates love to holiness, treating holiness as doctrinal fidelity. A Christological hermeneutic does the opposite:

  • Love is the criterion by which holiness is recognized.

  • Any theology that harms must be re-examined in light of Jesus’ own practice of boundary-crossing love.

  • The gospel is measured not by how well it enforces purity, but by how fully it enacts grace.

“God is not the guardian of our exclusions. God is the relentless presence within what we have excluded.”


Summary


Smith’s book represents a well-organized articulation of an old framework: fixed gender binaries, rigid biblical literalism, and holiness defined as exclusion. The present essay  above challenges that entire framework at its theological roots. These six points can be used for teaching, debate preparation, or theological dialogue in church settings.


Appendix B: Responding to The Gospel Coalition and Related Networks

The Gospel Coalition (TGC) and affiliated organizations — including CBMW (Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood), various Reformed networks, and conservative evangelical seminaries — are among the most influential voices shaping anti-LGBTQ+ theology in North America and beyond.

Their influence lies less in scholarly originality and more in amplifying and normalizing exclusionary theology through media, conferences, and pastoral training.

This appendix outlines key patterns of argument used by these groups and how the main essay offers a theological counter-framework.


1. Biblical Inerrancy as Weaponized Certainty

TGC treats its interpretation of Scripture as objective truth, framing disagreement as rebellion against God rather than hermeneutical difference. This rhetorical move:

  • Delegitimizes other Christian traditions,

  • Shields itself from critique,

  • Creates a false binary between faithfulness and compromise.

Response: Theological authority does not arise from unchangeable interpretation but from fidelity to the living Word revealed in love. As Jesus reinterpreted Torah for the sake of mercy, so must the church today.


2. Purity Culture and Gender Essentialism

TGC builds much of its theology on creation-order complementarianism — asserting fixed male and female roles as divinely mandated. This framework:

  • Overlooks cultural contingency in biblical texts,

  • Ignores gender diversity in Scripture,

  • Tethers holiness to conformity, not relationship.

Response: This is a theology of boundary policing, not Christic love. The gospel narrative repeatedly collapses such boundaries — in Jesus’ ministry, in Paul’s radical equality statements, and in the Spirit’s unpredictable inclusion of outsiders.


3. Misuse of Pastoral Language

TGC often couches exclusion in terms of “love and truth” — claiming to love queer and trans people while denying their dignity. This is a theological sleight of hand: love without inclusion is not love, it is church-language for the tolerance of it's harm and suffering placed upon unloved congregants and outsiders to their church organization.

Response: Genuine pastoral care must center the actual flourishing of the person, not their compliance with ideology. Christ’s love meets people as they are, not as dogma demands they be.


4. Framing Affirmation as Rebellion

TGC portrays affirming theology as capitulation to secularism. This framing assumes:

  • God cannot speak through new knowledge or human experience,

  • Tradition (and divine Revelation) is a closed, fixed system,

  • The Spirit no longer moves beyond inherited boundaries.

Response: Affirming LGBTQ+ dignity is not rebellion; it is a continuation of the biblical pattern of radical inclusion — akin to the church’s expansion to Gentiles, its dismantling of slavery, and its ongoing work against patriarchy and racism.


5. The Narrative of Cultural Decline

Many TGC leaders frame LGBTQ+ inclusion as a sign of societal moral decay. But this narrative:

  • Reflects cultural anxiety, not biblical insight,

  • Confuses Western Christendom with the gospel itself,

  • Projects fear rather than faith.

  • Shows the moral decay rampant within the church itself

Response: Fearful theology always tries to preserve control. But the God of Scripture calls people out of fear into courageous love. The future of faith is not threatened by inclusion — it is strengthened and renewed through it.


6. Reclaiming Holiness as Love

TGC theology hinges on holiness as separation. The counter-witness of Jesus is holiness as radical proximity.

  • He touched the untouchable.

  • He welcomed those purity systems rejected.

  • He broke Sabbath rules to heal.

This is not the abandonment of holiness. It is its truest expression.

“The church has chosen the exclusionary center for too long. Holiness has become a wall. Love will make it a door.”


Summary

The Gospel Coalition and similar groups sustain a networked theology of exclusion under the banner of “faithfulness.” This essay intends to disrupt this humanized architecture by:

  • Reframing holiness as love,

  • Exposing the idolatry of certainty,

  • Reclaiming Scripture as a living word,

  • Affirming the dignity of all bodies.

This appendix can serve as a resource for pastors, theologians, and discussion groups who need concise counterpoints to TGC narratives.


📚 Suggested Reading & References for Further Development

  • Megan DeFranza, Sex Difference in Christian Theology

  • Patrick Cheng, Radical Love

  • James Brownson, Bible, Gender, Sexuality

  • Karen Baker-Fletcher, Dancing with God

  • Catherine Keller, On the Mystery

  • Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, God, Christ, Church

  • Lisa Isherwood & Marcella Althaus-Reid, Trans/formations

  • Rowan Williams, The Body’s Grace