Isaiah as a Living Textual Tradition: Manuscripts, Variants & Transmission (SM10)

Of note, the image is blurred indicating the need to update
and renew past living faith-traditions. - R.E. Slater

Supplementary Materials

Part VI, Essay 10

Isaiah as a Living Textual Tradition:

Manuscripts, Variants & Transmission

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

A sacred text is not preserved by stillness,

but by being carried across

hands, and tongues, and centuries.

What endures is not a single, fixed, manuscript,

but the faithfulness of a faith's transmission,

in a Scripture not frozen in time,

by texts that live within their time.

Importantly, faithful continuity

does not require sameness -

the authority of a faith community's

teachings are sustained by those

who receive it and pass it on.

But not as an escape from history

through impervious, rigid texts -

but as a confirmation

to the community's living faith.

Hence, between parchment and promise,

the living voice of the Sacred remains,

to illumine, to guide, to protect, and provide.

R.E. Slater

December 31, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications

all rights reserved

---

Preface

Today's study stands in quiet continuity with the preceding series Evolution of Worship and Religion, which traced the historical development of religious imagination, ritual practice, and theological understanding across ancient cultures and traditions. While those essays examined how communities shaped and reshaped their understanding of the sacred, this present work turns to the textual dimension of that same process.

Here, the focus narrows from worship and worldview to the Jewish Scriptures themselves - specifically, to the transmission history of the book of Isaiah. The manuscript evidence surveyed in this essay illustrates - at the level of letters, lines, and variants - the same dynamics observed throughout the broader series: religious continuity without stasis, reverence without finality (rigidity), and fidelity sustained through living tradition rather than mechanical preservation (closed theologies).

Read on its own, this essay offers a self-contained study of Isaiah’s textual history. Read alongside the earlier opus, it serves as a complementary case study, demonstrating how the evolution of religious thought is mirrored within the evolution of the sacred texts that carry it forward.

---

Introduction: A Contemporary Claim of an Ancient Text

In recent popular discussions about the Bible, few discoveries are cited more confidently than the Dead Sea Scrolls. One frequently repeated claim - recently voiced by a guest on The Joe Rogan Experience - asserts that the Dead Sea Scrolls of Isaiah show that there are “no errors” between the ancient manuscripts and the Bible as it exists today. The implication is clear: the text of Isaiah has been transmitted unchanged, confirming a near-perfect continuity between the ancient world and modern Scripture.

Such claims are not without foundation. When the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaᵃ) was discovered at Qumran in 1947, scholars were struck by how recognizable the text was. More than a thousand years older than the medieval Masoretic manuscripts, the scroll contains the same book of Isaiah, in the same general order, with no missing chapters and no rewritten theology. For many readers, this discovery was both reassuring and awe-inspiring.

Yet the slogan “no errors” obscures as much as it reveals.

The Isaiah scrolls from Qumran do not present a mechanically identical text to later Hebrew Bibles. They preserve a form of Isaiah that is clearly related to the Masoretic Text, yet marked by hundreds of small differences - variations in spelling, grammar, word order, and occasionally wording itself. These differences are neither scandalous nor trivial. They are precisely what one would expect of a text copied, read, taught, and revered across centuries within living communities.

The Dead Sea Scrolls do not show us a frozen artifact. They show us a tradition at work.

---

I. The Major Textual Families of Isaiah

To understand what the evidence shows - and why it matters - it is necessary to identify the principal textual streams through which Isaiah has come down to us.

A. The Masoretic Text (MT)

The Masoretic Text represents the medieval Jewish standard form of the Hebrew Bible. Stabilized between roughly the 7th and 10th centuries CE, it is preserved in major codices such as the Aleppo Codex and the Leningrad Codex. The Masoretes developed an elaborate system of marginal notes, vocalization marks, and scribal safeguards (the Masorah) to preserve pronunciation, spelling, and interpretive tradition.

Most modern Hebrew Bibles - including Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS) and its successor Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ) - begin with the Masoretic Text as their base. Its authority lies not in pristine antiquity, but in its extraordinary consistency as a transmitted tradition.

*BHS (Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia) and BHQ (Biblia Hebraica Quinta) are scholarly Hebrew Bible editions based on the same Leningrad Codex - but BHQ is a newer, updated version that incorporates modern discoveries (like Dead Sea Scrolls fragments), provides a more complete and clearer Masorah (textual notes) with English explanations, uses a more extensive critical apparatus with English abbreviations, and offers improved textual commentary, effectively serving as a scholarly replacement for BHS with more detailed tools for textual analysis. 

Key Differences

Critical Apparatus: BHQ's apparatus is more comprehensive, includes variants from new resources (like Qumran), and uses English abbreviations, unlike BHS's Latin ones.

Masorah (Textual Notes): BHQ prints the Masorah magna directly on the page and includes dedicated sections with translations and discussions for both Masorah parva and magna, which BHS lacks.

New Resources: BHQ incorporates findings from the Dead Sea Scrolls and uses newer, high-quality images of the Leningrad Codex, leading to minor text variations (vowel points, etc.).

Textual Commentary: BHQ provides detailed textual commentaries explaining significant textual issues and the rationale for choices, making the subjectivity clearer than in BHS.

Format: BHQ is published in smaller, book-by-book fascicles, making it more portable, and sometimes presents poetic texts differently (stichography).

Conjectural Emendations: BHQ avoids unsupported conjectural emendations (guesses about original readings) found in earlier editions, focusing more on manuscript evidence. 

In essence, BHQ builds upon BHS, offering a more sophisticated and user-friendly tool for serious textual study by making more information readily available and clarifying editorial decisions.

B. The Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS): Isaiah at Qumran

Among the Dead Sea Scrolls are multiple manuscripts of Isaiah, the most famous of which is 1QIsaᵃ, the Great Isaiah Scroll. This nearly complete manuscript predates the Masoretic codices by roughly a millennium. While its overall sequence and contents align closely with the MT, it exhibits numerous orthographic and grammatical differences, along with occasional lexical variation.

A second manuscript, 1QIsaᵇ, is more fragmentary and often aligns more closely with the Masoretic Text than 1QIsaᵃ does. Together with additional Isaiah fragments from Cave 4, these manuscripts demonstrate that Isaiah circulated in multiple textual forms during the Second Temple period. Qumran was not preserving a single “alternative Bible,” but a library reflecting overlapping textual streams.

C. The Septuagint (LXX)

The Septuagint version of Isaiah is not merely a Jewish translation into Greek (by Greek-speaking Jews from Alexandria, Egypt, in the 3rd century BCE). In many places it reflects a Hebrew Vorlage (prototype or template) that differs from the Masoretic Text. For Jews in the Hellenistic diaspora - and later for early Christians - the Septuagint became the primary scriptural form of Isaiah. As a result, much Christian interpretation of Isaiah is shaped by Greek phrasing and interpretive decisions that are not always similar when left inside the more ancient Hebrew culture and Hebrew text alone.

D. Targum Jonathan (Aramaic Isaiah)

The Aramaic Targum of Isaiah represents an explicitly interpretive tradition. Often paraphrastic, it tends to avoid anthropomorphic language for God and, in certain passages, makes messianic interpretations more explicit than the Hebrew text does. The Targum (a paraphrase or interpretation by a faith community of its Scriptures) demonstrates how Isaiah was taught in synagogue contexts, not merely copied.

E. Peshitta and Vulgate

The Syriac Peshitta (Jewish/OT - 2nd century CE; Greek/NT - 5th century CE) and the Latin Vulgate (by the Church Father, Jerome, btw 390 - 405 CE based on Old Latin texts of the OT and Hebrew/Greek texts of the NT) are later witnesses, yet they preserve valuable interpretive trajectories and occasionally reflect older readings indirectly. Together, these traditions show how Isaiah’s text and meaning traveled across languages, cultures, and communities.

---

II. Temporal and Cultural Distance in the Septuagint

Because the Septuagint was produced in a different time (before 3rd century BCE), place (Canaan v Eqypt), and linguistic world (Israel v Egyptian diaspora) than the earliest Hebrew compositions of Isaiah, it inevitably reflects cultural and conceptual shifts that had already taken place within Judaism itself.

Firstly, Isaiah ministered between ca. 740-700 BCE (the late 8th century BCE) in the Kingdom of Judah during the reigns of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah under the watchful eye of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Further:

Key events influencing Isaiah’s preaching

• The Syro-Ephraimite War (ca. 735–732 BCE)
• Assyrian expansion under Tiglath-Pileser III
• Fall of the Northern Kingdom (Israel) in 722 BCE
• Threats against Jerusalem (esp. during Hezekiah’s reign)

Core themes of Isaiah

• Covenant faithfulness
• Social justice
• Zion theology
• Trust in YHWH rather than political alliances
• Judgment paired with hope

Secondly, the book of Isaiah was produced in three parts or compositional layers across several centuries. These are not three separate books but three major stages of socio-theological development within one prophetic tradition.

• First Isaiah 1-39, ca 8th century BCE (Judah's judgment, it's hope, and ethical failure, Assyrian crisis)
• Second Isaiah 40-55, 540-520 BCE (Babylonian exile, Fall of Babylon, rise of Cyrus of Persia)
• Third Isaiah 56-66, ca 520 - 450 BCE (early Persian era, post-exilic Judah, Temple and Jerusalem rebuilt, addresses community tensions)

Thirdly, by the third and second centuries BCE, Jewish communities in the Hellenistic (Greek-influenced) diaspora inhabited a world shaped by Greek language, philosophy, administrative categories, and literary conventions. Even when translators worked carefully and reverently, translation itself required interpretive decisions - especially when Hebrew idioms, poetic imagery, or theological expressions lacked direct Greek equivalents.

As a result, the Septuagint does not merely “reproduce” Hebrew thought in another language. It refracts that thought through the conceptual frameworks available to Greek-speaking Jews of the period. This can be seen in:

• shifts toward more abstract or philosophical language,
• clarifications of ambiguous Hebrew expressions,
• subtle re-framings of divine agency and transcendence,
• and occasional expansions that make implicit meanings more explicit.

These differences do not indicate distortion or betrayal of the Hebrew tradition. They testify to its continued life within new historical conditions. The Septuagint represents Judaism in translation - faithful to its inheritance, yet responsive to its context. (hence, religious communities are fraught between fixity to tradition and ministration to a contemporary world. In the earlier 30-part study we noted the relative ease that faith-communities moved between these theologic poles).

In this sense, the LXX stands as an early example of what later traditions would repeat: the re-expression of sacred texts in new cultural grammars without abandoning their identity. What modern readers often experience as “difference” is, in fact, the normal consequence of Scripture becoming re-contextualized beyond its original setting.

---

IV. What Textual Differences Are - and Are Not

Before examining specific passages, it is important to clarify what scholars mean by “textual variants,” and why the term often generates unnecessary anxiety.

Most differences between the Dead Sea Scrolls of Isaiah and the Masoretic Text fall into well-understood categories:

• Orthographic variations: differences in spelling, especially fuller spellings in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

• Grammatical and morphological shifts: changes in verb forms, pronouns, or number.

• Word order adjustments: often reflecting stylistic smoothing rather than semantic change.

• Scribal phenomena: such as accidental omissions or repetitions.

• Occasional lexical differences: alternative words or phrases, usually synonymous but sometimes interpretively significant.

• Rare plus/minus material: small expansions or omissions, particularly in poetic or apocalyptic sections.

What these differences are not is equally important:

• They are not evidence of doctrinal corruption.
• They do not introduce new books, erase old ones, or replace central theological claims.
• They do not indicate carelessness or instability in transmission.

Instead, they reveal that Isaiah circulated in more than one textual form during the Second Temple period. Some manuscripts align closely with the later Masoretic tradition; others, such as the Great Isaiah Scroll, reflect a freer orthographic and stylistic profile. This pluriformity existed long before rabbinic Judaism standardized the Hebrew text through the Masoretic tradition.

Theologically, this matters because it challenges modern assumptions about how sacred texts “must” behave in order to be authoritative. Authority, in the ancient world, did not require microscopic uniformity. It required recognizability, continuity, and faithful interpretive use.

---

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

IV. Why Textual Variants Matter Theologically

Textual differences in Isaiah are rarely dramatic, but they are instructive. They show that meaning is not carried only by abstract ideas, but by language in use - language spoken aloud, copied by hand, interpreted in community, and adapted to new contexts of teaching and worship.

Several theological implications follow:

1. Revelation is mediated
   Isaiah’s authority was never dependent on a single pristine manuscript, but on a tradition that preserved its voice across time.

2. Transmission is an act of interpretation
   Scribes did not merely reproduce letters; they clarified, smoothed, and sometimes corrected texts they received.

3. Stability and variation coexist
   The book remains Isaiah, even as its wording exhibits small but meaningful differences.

4. Later theological debates often exaggerate textual differences
   Jewish and Christian disagreements about Isaiah typically arise not from manuscript divergence, but from interpretive trajectories layered onto largely shared texts.

Seen this way, textual criticism does not threaten theology. It deepens it, by helping contemporary studies, theologians, and communities learn how to apply sacred meaning to life experiences.

---

V. From Variant to Meaning: How Differences Become Interpretation

Not all textual differences carry the same interpretive weight. One of the most important disciplines in textual study is learning to distinguish between difference and significance. A variant becomes theologically meaningful not simply because it exists, but because of how it functions within a broader interpretive ecosystem.

Several factors determine whether a textual difference matters beyond the level of scribal detail:

First, context matters. Variants in narrative or legal material often carry less interpretive impact than those embedded in poetry, prophecy, or liturgical speech - genres in which nuance, imagery, and emphasis play a central role.

Second, repetition amplifies importance. A single variant may be inconsequential on its own, while a pattern of similar variations across manuscripts or traditions may signal a meaningful interpretive tendency.

Third, translation magnifies difference. When a Hebrew ambiguity is rendered into another language - especially Greek or Aramaic - the translator must choose among possible meanings. These choices can solidify one interpretive trajectory while obscuring others, even when the underlying Hebrew remains unchanged.

Fourth, tradition carries momentum. Once a particular reading becomes embedded in communal worship, theological reflection, or authoritative commentary, its influence may far exceed its textual distinctiveness. In such cases, theology often follows tradition more than manuscript evidence.

Finally, theological divergence often outpaces textual divergence. Jewish and Christian interpretations of Isaiah frequently differ not because their manuscripts disagree dramatically, but because each community inherited different textual pipelines and interpretive priorities.

Recognizing these dynamics allows textual variants to be evaluated with restraint and precision. Rather than treating every difference as a theological threat or a hidden revelation, this approach situates each variant within its historical, literary, and communal context - where its true significance can be more accurately assessed.

With these interpretive dynamics in view, we can now examine a series of passages in Isaiah where textual variation most clearly intersects with later theological reflection.

---

VI. Key Textual “Hotspot” Passages in Isaiah

What follows is a curated selection of passages where textual variation is most often discussed. These examples are representative rather than exhaustive.

1. Isaiah 1:11-17 - Minor wording differences subtly sharpen Isaiah’s ethical critique of sacrifice without justice.

2. Isaiah 2:9-10 - Grammatical shifts affect agency in judgment imagery.

3. Isaiah 7:14 - The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the Hebrew ʿalmâ (“young woman”), while later theological debates arise primarily from the Greek parthenos in the Septuagint re Mary's “virgin birth”.

4. Isaiah 9:6-7 - Word division and phrasing influence how royal titles are read, though the underlying Hebrew tradition remains consistent.

5. Isaiah 11:6-9 - Lexical variation within poetic imagery shows scribal smoothing rather than doctrinal change.

6. Isaiah 19:18 - A consonantal ambiguity yields “City of Destruction” or “City of the Sun,” illustrating how meaning can hinge on later vocalization.

7. Isaiah 24-27 - Structural and plus/minus variations suggest a flexible transmission history in apocalyptic material.

8. Isaiah 40:6-8 - Differences in speaker attribution subtly alter the rhetorical staging of divine speech.

9. Isaiah 42:1-4 - Verb tense and pronoun variation affects how the Servant’s mission is temporally framed.

10. Isaiah 49:5-6 - Clause placement influences whether the Servant is identified primarily with Israel or as a light beyond Israel.

11. Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12 – The Suffering Servant passage shows textual stability alongside minor grammatical variation; interpretive divergence far exceeds manuscript difference.

12. Isaiah 66:23-24 – Singular and plural forms affect the scope of universal worship imagery.

Across these passages, the pattern remains consistent: the composition of Isaiah’s text is stable, yet alive - carefully preserved, occasionally adjusted, and always meaningful within its historical contexts.

---

VII. Conclusion: Fidelity Without Fixation

The textual history of Isaiah does not support the modern fantasy of an untouched manuscript descending unchanged through time (per conservative evangelical thought). Nor does it support the cynical claim that Scripture is hopelessly unstable (per common agnostic/atheistic attestation). What it reveals instead is something more human, and more profound.

Isaiah was transmitted by communities who unquestionably trusted the transmission of the text, worked with it, and preserved it with care - not as a museum artifact, but as a living voice. The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm this trust, even as they complicate simplistic claims about perfection or errorlessness. They show that Scripture endured not because it was frozen, but because faith communities received the Scriptures, repeated the Scriptures, and renewed the Scripture relative to their times, eras, and experiences.

In this sense, the book of Isaiah stands as a testament not only to prophetic imagination, but to the faithfulness of transmission itself - a fidelity that honors continuity without demanding rigidity, and reverence without denial of history.

---

~ Continue to Part VI, Essay 11 ~

Evolution of Worship & Religion

• Introduction
• Maps, Tables & Data
• A Proposed Outline
• Resources

• Part I - Foundations: The Birth of the Sacred
• Essay 1 - Animism and the Living Cosmos
• Essay 2 - From Tribe to Totem

• Part II - The Age of Gods
• Essay 3 - The Mesopotamian Fertile Crescent
• Essay 4 - Egypt, Indus, and Minoa Sacred Cultures
• Essay 5 - From Polytheism to Henotheism

• Part III - Axial Awakenings
• Essay 6 - Ancient Israel, Persia, and Monotheism
• Essay 7 - India's Axial Age
• Essay 8 - Greece and the Birth of Reason

• Part IV - The Sacred Made Universal
• Essay 9 - The Age of Universal Religions
• Essay 10 - Modernity and the Eclipse of the Sacred
• Essay 11 - The Rebirth of the Sacred

• Part V - Conclusion of Series
• Essay 12 - A Processual Summation of Worship and Religion
• Essay 13 - The Way of Cruciformity: When God Refused Power

• Part VI - Supplementary Materials
• 1 - The Ancient History of Mesopotamia
• 2 - The History of Language in Ancient Mesopotamia
• 3 - The Ancient History of the Hebrew Language
• 4 - How the Ancient Near East Gave Shape to Israel's God:
• Why the ANE is Essential for Israel's Received Theology (I-II)
• Affecting Cultic Syncretism Across the Ancient Near East (III-V)
• Cultural Identity Formation & the Rejection of Syncretism (VI-IX)
• 5 - The History & Compilation of the Hebrew Bible:
• From Oral Memory to Proto-Canon (I-II)
• Exile, Redaction, and the Birth of Scripture (III)
• Second Temple Scribalization to Canonization (IV-V)
• 6 - The Unhelpful Oxymorons of "Biblical Authority" & "Inerrancy"
• 7 - The Evolution of Inerrancy: From Ancient Plurality to Modern Certainty
• 8 - A Historical-Theological Study of "Son of Man" vs "Son of God"
• 9 - The Song of Gilgamesh & Other Ancient Flood Stories
• 10 - Isaiah as a Living Textual Tradition: Manuscripts, Variants & Transmission
• 11 - From Scroll to Scripture: Bible Versions, Variants & their Histories

---

BIBLIOGRAPHY

---

Primary Texts & Critical Editions

• Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS). Edited by Karl Elliger and Wilhelm Rudolph. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1997.

• Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ). Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, ongoing.

• The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible. Translated and edited by Martin Abegg Jr., Peter Flint, and Eugene Ulrich. New York: HarperOne, 1999.

• Septuaginta: Vetus Testamentum Graecum. Edited by Alfred Rahlfs and Robert Hanhart. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2006.

• The Septuagint with Apocrypha: Greek and English. Translated by Sir Lancelot C. L. Brenton. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1987.

• Targum Jonathan of the Prophets. Translated by Kevin Cathcart and Robert Gordon. Aramaic Bible Series. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1989.

---

Dead Sea Scrolls & Textual Transmission

• Abegg, Martin Jr., Peter Flint, and Eugene Ulrich. The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible. New York: HarperOne, 1999.

• Flint, Peter W. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Bible. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2013.

• Ulrich, Eugene. The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Bible. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.

• VanderKam, James C. The Dead Sea Scrolls Today. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.

• Tov, Emanuel. Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.

---

Isaiah Studies

• Blenkinsopp, Joseph. Isaiah 1–39; Isaiah 40–55; Isaiah 56–66. Anchor Yale Bible Commentaries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000–2003.

• Childs, Brevard S. Isaiah. Old Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

• Goldingay, John. The Theology of the Book of Isaiah. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2014.

• Oswalt, John N. The Book of Isaiah. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986–1998.

• Seitz, Christopher R. Isaiah 1–39. Interpretation Commentary Series. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.

---

Septuagint & Translation Studies

• Jobes, Karen H., and Moisés Silva. Invitation to the Septuagint. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2015.

• Pietersma, Albert, and Benjamin G. Wright, eds. A New English Translation of the Septuagint. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

• Law, Timothy Michael. When God Spoke Greek: The Septuagint and the Making of the Christian Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

---

Jewish Interpretation & Tradition

• Kugel, James L. How to Read the Bible. New York: Free Press, 2007.

• Fishbane, Michael. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.

• Neusner, Jacob. Introduction to Rabbinic Literature. New York: Doubleday, 1994.

---

Digital & Reference Resources

• Israel Museum, Digital Dead Sea Scrolls
  https://dss.collections.imj.org.il

• Brill Online Reference Works – Isaiah & DSS Entries
  https://referenceworks.brillonline.com

• Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft (BHS/BHQ resources)
  https://www.die-bibel.de

• Dead Sea Scrolls English Bible
  https://dssenglishbible.com

• Isaiah Scroll Overview
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_Scroll

• Textual Criticism Bibliography Hub (C. J. Conroy)
  https://cjconroy.net/biblical-textual-criticism/