Changes Across the History of Judaism from it's Origins to the PostExilic Era

Changes Across the History of Judaism from it's Origins to the PostExilic Era

My last post reviewed Israel's ancient priesthood from a biblical perspective, including to it's comparison to Christ's priesthood. Here, I would like to think through in historical-critical terms how ancient Israel's priesthood's job function and theology change era by era. Over the next several posts I will also do the same with the church's patristic eras thus charting how older narratives and beliefs affected future narratives and beliefs for the better or the worse.

Historical-critical scholarship reveals that ancient Israel’s priesthood evolved significantly over time - along with its national theology shifting in response to a changing social, political, and religious contexts. Here’s an overview of these transformations by historical era:

---

I - Ancient to Post-Exilic Judaism

1. The Patriarchal Era

Mythic Foundations:

• Ambiguous Archetypes: In early narratives, priestly functions appear in mythic, non-institutional forms. The figure of Melchizedek—who appears in Genesis as a priest-king—embodies a mysterious, timeless priesthood.
• Non-Hereditary Model: Unlike later, codified roles, this early priesthood is not based on genealogy but on an enigmatic, eternal authority that echoes broader ancient Near Eastern traditions of warrior or divine kingship.
• Symbolic Function: The mythic theology here emphasizes an innate, almost cosmic mediation between the divine and human realms, setting a pattern that later traditions would reinterpret.

---

2. The Exodus and Wilderness Period

Codification of Ritual and Authority:

• Institutional Establishment: With the Exodus narrative, a formal priesthood emerges. The appointment of Aaron and his descendants marks the beginning of a hereditary priestly class tasked with executing detailed ritual laws.
• Priestly Source Influence: Historical-critical scholars note that many of the texts detailing tabernacle worship, sacrificial rites, and purity laws are associated with the Priestly (P) source. This source appears to have constructed an idealized system of worship meant to unify the community through centralized rituals.
• Theological Shift: The emphasis moves from an ambiguous, mythic model to a regulated system where the priesthood not only mediates between God and Israel but also reinforces communal identity and legal order.

---

3. The Conquest and Judges Period

Diverse and Decentralized Practices:

• Fragmented Worship: As Israel settles in Canaan, religious practice becomes more diverse. Local altars and shrines proliferate alongside the emerging centralized priestly practices, suggesting a period of religious experimentation and contestation.
• Tensions and Transitions: During this era, charismatic figures and prophets sometimes challenge the formal priestly establishment, reflecting tensions between localized, spontaneous religious expressions and the more institutionalized cult.
• Mythic Reinterpretation: The mythology of priesthood during this period becomes less uniform, with various traditions coexisting. This pluralism later sets the stage for debates about the “true” or “ideal” form of priesthood in Israel’s collective memory.

---

4. The Monarchical Era

Centralization and National Identity:

• Temple Cult and Royal Integration: Under the unified monarchy of David and Solomon, the priesthood is closely linked to the state. The construction of Solomon’s Temple symbolizes a peak in religious centralization, where priestly functions and royal authority merge to form a unified national narrative.
• Deuteronomistic Influence: Reforms associated with the Deuteronomistic tradition emphasize the exclusive worship at Jerusalem’s Temple. This not only bolsters the authority of the priesthood but also integrates it into a broader ideological project that legitimizes the monarchy.
• Mythic Transformation: In this era, the priesthood’s mythic theology is redefined as a guarantor of both religious purity and political stability. The temple becomes the tangible locus of divine presence, and the priesthood is tasked with maintaining the covenantal relationship between God and a centralized nation.

---

5. The Exilic and Post-Exilic Era

From Temple to Text and Community:

• Crisis and Reorientation: The Babylonian exile, with its destruction of the Temple, forces a dramatic rethinking of priestly authority. With the loss of the central cultic space, the priesthood’s role shifts from managing ritual sacrifice to preserving sacred texts and traditions.
• Custodians of Identity: In the post-exilic period, figures like Ezra and Nehemiah emerge as leaders who use the written law to rebuild a fragmented community. The mythic theology of the priesthood is reoriented toward internal, community-based practice, emphasizing study, interpretation, and legal reform.
• Internalization of the Divine: The focus on the Word and the law transforms the notion of priestly mediation. Rather than relying on an external temple, the renewed priesthood becomes the guardian of an internalized, spiritual covenant—one that defines Israel’s identity in a diasporic context.

---

Summary

Over time, the priesthood in ancient Israel transitioned from a non-institutional archetype in the patriarchal era to a highly regulated, temple-centered institution during the Exodus, Monarchical, and Exilic periods. Each phase reflects broader shifts in Israel’s socio-political and religious landscape—from decentralized, enigmatic traditions to centralized, state-sponsored worship, and finally to a reimagined, text-based mediation that secured communal identity in the face of crisis. Historical-critical scholarship thus underscores the dynamic interplay between myth, ritual, and institutional authority in shaping Israel’s evolving priestly theology.

---

II - The Evolution of Judaism through Time

Next, let's note that ancient Israel's religion did not develop in isolation but was deeply embedded in—and reactive to—the religious and cultural currents of the ancient Near East. Historical-critical scholarship shows that as Israel evolved, so did its religious system, absorbing, reinterpreting, and sometimes contesting elements from surrounding cultures. 

Here’s how that process unfolded:

---

1. Shared Near Eastern Context

• Cultural Milieu:
  Ancient Israel emerged in a region where polytheism, temple cults, and ritual practices were widespread. The mythologies, legal traditions, and sacrificial systems of neighboring peoples—such as the Mesopotamians, Canaanites, and Egyptians—formed a common cultural background.
• Linguistic and Symbolic Parallels:
  Terms like “el” or “elohim” (used in reference to God) reflect a shared ancient vocabulary for the divine, one that originally belonged to a broader group of deities before Israel’s religion gradually embraced monotheism.

---

2. Influence of Canaanite Religion

• Local Religious Practices:
  As Israel settled in Canaan, many of its early cultic practices—such as the use of high places, altars, and sacred groves—mirrored the indigenous Canaanite religious system.
• Mythic Overlap:
  Stories and names from the Canaanite pantheon appear in Israelite texts in reworked form. For example, while Canaanites worshipped deities like El and Baal, Israelite tradition reinterpreted “El” as the singular, supreme God, distancing itself from the polytheistic context while still using familiar symbols and imagery.
• Reform Movements:
  Later biblical reforms (especially those seen in the Deuteronomistic history) explicitly rejected many Canaanite practices, promoting centralized worship in Jerusalem and a monotheistic framework that redefined the earlier, more eclectic traditions.

---

3. Mesopotamian Parallels

• Myth and Narrative:
  Mesopotamian literature—such as the creation and flood narratives found in the Enuma Elish or the Epic of Gilgamesh—shares notable similarities with biblical texts. These parallels suggest that Israelite authors were aware of, and engaging with, stories circulating in the wider region.
• Cosmology and Divine Council:
  Like Mesopotamian traditions, early Israelite texts sometimes depict a divine council or assembly of heavenly beings. Over time, however, this image was refined into a strictly monotheistic vision, with God as the singular sovereign ruler who stands apart from any council of deities.

---

4. Egyptian and Other Influences

• Exilic and Ritual Elements:
  Egypt’s long history of elaborate temple rituals and administrative organization left its mark on the idea of a formal priesthood and ritual purity. During the Exodus narrative and the wilderness period, some ritual elements (such as sacrificial systems and tabernacle design) echo Egyptian religious practices even as they are reinterpreted within a distinct Israelite covenantal framework.
• Political and Ideological Interactions:
  Throughout its history, Israel’s leaders sometimes adopted or adapted political and ideological motifs from dominant regional powers, including Egypt. These influences can be seen in royal imagery and in the language of divine kingship, where the Israelite Davidic king reflects broader Near Eastern traditions of the god-ordained monarch, yet is also redefined in light of prophetic and covenantal expectations.

---

5. Distinctive Reconfigurations

• From Polytheism to Monotheism:
  While many surrounding cultures maintained polytheistic systems, Israel’s religion evolved toward monotheism—a radical reinterpretation that restructured familiar symbols (like sacred altars, temple cults, and divine assemblies) into a framework that emphasized one transcendent God.
• Covenantal Theology:
  Unlike the more transactional or ritualistic pacts common in other cultures, Israel’s covenant (as articulated in texts like Exodus and Deuteronomy) framed the relationship with the divine in terms of ethical and legal obligations. This marked a shift from neighboring religious practices toward a more personalized and communal identity.
• Priestly Ideology:
  The transformation of the priesthood—from the enigmatic figures of the patriarchal era to the highly institutionalized cult of the Jerusalem Temple—also mirrors the broader cultural negotiations. Israel’s priestly texts rework and systematize traditions that were familiar in the ancient Near East, while simultaneously asserting a unique, divinely ordained identity.

---

Conclusion

Ancient Israel’s religious system reflects a complex interplay between indigenous developments and the cultural, political, and religious influences of its neighbors. By engaging with and ultimately reconfiguring the mythic and ritual traditions of surrounding cultures, Israelite religion forged a distinct identity—one that moved from polytheistic and localized practices toward a unique covenantal monotheism. This evolution not only highlights the adaptive and dialogical nature of ancient religious thought but also underscores how cultural interaction can lead to profound theological innovation.

---

III - Biblical-Historical References

Below is a list of scholarly works that provide background and support for the historical‐critical perspectives on how ancient Israel’s religion both developed internally and engaged with its Near Eastern neighbors:

Mark S. Smith, The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford University Press, 2001).

Explores how Israel’s transition from a polytheistic milieu to monotheism was influenced by Ugaritic texts and broader ancient Near Eastern traditions.

According to the Bible, ancient Israel's neighbors worshipped a wide variety of gods. In recent years, scholars have sought a better understanding of this early polytheistic milieu and its relation to Yahweh, the God of Israel. Drawing on ancient Ugaritic texts and looking closely at Ugaritic deities, Mark Smith examines the meaning of "divinity" in the ancient near East and considers how this concept applies to Yahweh.

John Day, Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan (Sheffield Academic Press, 1999).

Examines the interplay between Canaanite deities and the emerging concept of a singular, supreme God in Israelite religion.

This masterly book is the climax of over twenty-five years of study of the impact of Canaanite religion and mythology on ancient Israel and the Old Testament. It is John Day's magnum opus in which he sets forth all his main arguments and conclusions on the subject. The work considers in detail the relationship between Yahweh and the various gods and goddesses of Canaan, including the leading gods El and Baal, the great goddesses (Asherah, Astarte and Anat), astral deities (Sun, Moon and Lucifer), and underworld deities (Mot, Resheph, Molech and the Rephaim). Day assesses both what Yahwism assimilated from these deities and what it came to reject. More generally he discusses the impact of Canaanite polytheism on ancient Israel and how monotheism was eventually achieved.

Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of its Sacred Texts (Simon & Schuster, 2001).

Provides an archaeological perspective on how Israel’s religious practices and institutions evolved in response to their cultural and political context.

In this groundbreaking work that sets apart fact and legend, authors Finkelstein and Silberman use significant archeological discoveries to provide historical information about biblical Israel and its neighbors.

In this iconoclastic and provocative work, leading scholars Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman draw on recent archaeological research to present a dramatically revised portrait of ancient Israel and its neighbors. They argue that crucial evidence (or a telling lack of evidence) at digs in Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon suggests that many of the most famous stories in the Bible—the wanderings of the patriarchs, the Exodus from Egypt, Joshua’s conquest of Canaan, and David and Solomon’s vast empire—reflect the world of the later authors rather than actual historical facts.

Challenging the fundamentalist readings of the scriptures and marshaling the latest archaeological evidence to support its new vision of ancient Israel, The Bible Unearthed offers a fascinating and controversial perspective on when and why the Bible was written and why it possesses such great spiritual and emotional power today.

Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Harvard University Press, 1973).

Offers a comparative look at mythologies in the ancient Near East, highlighting both similarities and distinct developments in Israelite narratives.

The essays in this volume address key aspects of Israelite religious development. Frank Moore Cross traces the continuities between early Israelite religion and the Canaanite culture from which it emerged; explores the tension between the mythic and the historical in Israel’s religious expression; and examines the reemergence of Canaanite mythic material in the apocalypticism of early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Lester L. Grabbe, Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It? (T&T Clark, 2007).

Presents a comprehensive overview of Israel’s history and religious evolution, including interactions with neighboring cultures.

In Ancient Israel Lester L. Grabbe sets out to summarize what we know through a survey of sources and how we know it by a discussion of methodology and by evaluating the evidence. The most basic question about the history of ancient Israel, how do we know what we know, leads to the fundamental questions of Grabbe's work: what are the sources for the history of Israel and how do we evaluate them? How do we make them 'speak' to us through the fog of centuries?

Grabbe focuses on original sources, including inscriptions, papyri, and archaeology. He examines the problems involved in historical methodology and deals with the major issues surrounding the use of the biblical text when writing a history of this period. Ancient Israel provides an enlightening overview and critique of current scholarly debate. It can therefore serve as a 'handbook' or reference-point for those wanting a catalogue of original sources, scholarship, and secondary studies. Grabbe's clarity of style makes this book eminently accessible not only to students of biblical studies and ancient history but also to the interested lay reader.

For this new edition the entire text has been reworked to take account of new archaeological discoveries and theories. There is a major expansion to include a comprehensive coverage of David and Solomon and more detailed information on specific kings of Israel throughout. Grabbe has also added material on the historicity of the Exodus, and provided a thorough update of the material on the later bronze age.

John Barton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Historical Books of the Hebrew Bible (Oxford University Press, 2011).

Contains essays that address how the religious reforms and institutions in ancient Israel were shaped by and reacted to the wider cultural context.

The Oxford Handbook of Historical Books of the Hebrew Bible is a collection of essays that provide resources for the interpretation of the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. The volume is not exhaustive in its coverage, but examines interpretive aspects of these books that are deemed essential for interpretation or that are representative of significant trends in present and future scholarship. The individual essays are united by their focus on two guiding questions: (1) What does this topic have to do with the Old Testament Historical Books? and (2) How does this topic help readers better interpret the Old Testament Historical Books? Each essay critically surveys prior scholarship before presenting current and prospective approaches.

Taking into account the ongoing debates concerning the relationship between the Old Testament texts and historical events in the ancient world, data from Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian culture and history are used to provide a larger context for the content of the Historical Books. Essays consider specific issues related to Israelite/Judean history (settlement, state formation, monarchy, forced migration, and return) as they relate to the interpretation of the Historical Books. This volume also explores the specific themes, concepts, and content that are most essential for interpreting these books. In light of the diverse material included in this section of the Old Testament, the Handbook further examines interpretive strategies that employ various redactional, synthetic, and theory-based approaches. Beyond the Old Testament proper, subsequent texts, traditions, and cultures often received and interpreted the material in the Historical Books, and so the volume concludes by investigating the literary, social, and theological aspects of that reception.

BAS, Jewish Worship, Pagan Symbols: Zodiac mosaics in ancient synagogues, by Walter Zanger, posted July 04, 2024.

Questions of why the mosaic tiles of the zodiac were discovered in an ancient synagogue. I might posit myself that the synagogue ceased in its function and became a residence of non-Jews oriented to the cultural artistry of their day - re slater

These references offer insight into the processes by which ancient Israel's religion absorbed, adapted, and sometimes rejected the mythic and ritual traditions of the surrounding cultures.

Israel's Priesthood through the Biblical Eras, Melchizedek, & Jesus Christ

Israel's Priesthood through the Biblical Eras, Melchizedek, & Jesus Christ

Compiled by R.E. Slater

The Biblical Eras

1. Patriarchal Era

• Timeframe: From the accounts of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (roughly early second millennium BCE).
• Key Features:
• There is no formal priestly institution.
• Religious encounters are direct and personal.
• Figures like Melchizedek (a “priest-king” in Genesis) provide an early, albeit enigmatic, model of priestly function—a mediator between the divine and the human without an established hereditary office.

1. Exodus and Wilderness Period

• Timeframe: During the Israelite journey out of Egypt and their sojourn in the wilderness (traditionally dated to the late second millennium BCE).
• Key Features:
• The formalization of priesthood begins with God’s selection of Aaron and his sons (Exodus 28–29).
• The establishment of the tabernacle as the mobile center of worship marks a shift toward systematic ritual practice.
• Priestly theology here emphasizes ritual purity, sacrificial systems, and the proper observance of the covenant through detailed liturgical prescriptions.

1. Conquest, Settlement, and Judges Period

• Timeframe: Following the entry into Canaan and during the time of the Judges (approximately the 12th to 11th centuries BCE).
• Key Features:
• Religious practice remains somewhat decentralized, with local cultic sites and altars complementing the emerging Levitical system.
• While priestly functions and ritual practices are recognized, there is less emphasis on a centralized, codified priesthood.
• Charismatic leaders and prophets sometimes challenge or supplement priestly authority, reflecting a dynamic religious landscape.

1. Monarchical Era (United and Divided Kingdoms)

• Timeframe: From the establishment of the monarchy under Saul, David, and Solomon (roughly 11th–10th centuries BCE) through the period of the divided kingdoms.
• Key Features:
• The building of the Temple in Jerusalem (under Solomon) centralizes worship and elevates the role of the priests in both religious and national identity.
• Priestly theology during this period intertwines with statecraft; the priests help define the national covenant, enforce ritual purity, and maintain a unified liturgical practice.
• Reform movements (e.g., those reflected in the Deuteronomic texts) often critique and seek to regulate priestly practices to ensure proper worship and centralization in Jerusalem.

1. Exilic and Post-Exilic Era

   • Timeframe: Beginning with the Babylonian exile (6th century BCE) and continuing into the period of return and restoration under Persian rule.
   • Key Features:
     • The destruction of the Temple forces a reevaluation of religious life. Without a central sanctuary, the priesthood shifts its focus toward preserving and interpreting sacred texts, laws, and ritual practices.
     • Priests become custodians of the renewed community identity—working through figures like Ezra and Nehemiah—to reestablish a coherent religious tradition in a post-exilic, often diasporic, context.
     • There is a greater emphasis on legal and liturgical reform, reflecting an adaptation to new social and political realities.

---

How Priestly Theology Changed from Era to Era

• From Informal to Formal:
  In the earliest narratives (the Patriarchal Era), priesthood is more an exceptional role (as seen with Melchizedek) rather than an institutionalized office. With the Exodus, the priesthood is formally established through Aaron and his descendants, introducing a systematic approach to ritual and purity.

• Centralization of Worship:
  During the Monarchical Era, especially with the construction of the Temple in Jerusalem, priestly theology becomes central to national identity. The priests are no longer just ritual specialists; they help define and enforce the covenant relationship between God and Israel on a national scale.

• Adaptation in Crisis:
  The Exilic and Post-Exilic Era marks a significant transformation. Faced with the loss of the Temple and the disintegration of the old socio-political order, the priesthood adapts by shifting its role toward textual preservation, legal interpretation, and community restoration. This era redefines priestly authority, emphasizing a renewed focus on law, ritual purity, and identity even in the absence of a central sanctuary.

---

In summary, Jewish priestly theology evolved from a context of personal, informal encounters with the divine in the Patriarchal Era to a highly institutionalized and central component of national identity and ritual practice during the Monarchical Era, and finally to a form of custodial and reformative leadership in the Exilic/Post-Exilic period. Each transformation reflects broader shifts in Israelite society and the changing needs of the community in its relationship with the divine.

* * * * * * * *

How is Jesus Christ Compared to the

Jewish Priesthood of Ancient Israel?

1. Patriarchal Era

• Context & Characteristics:
  In the early narratives, we encounter figures like Melchizedek—a king-priest who blesses Abraham. His mysterious, non-hereditary priesthood is presented without the formal structures later seen in Israel.
• Typological Significance:
  • Foreshadowing Christ’s Eternal Priesthood:
    Melchizedek is explicitly mentioned in Hebrews as a type of Christ—a priest whose order is “without beginning of days or end of life” (cf. Hebrews 7).
  • Symbol of Direct Divine Encounter:
    Just as the patriarchs experienced a personal relationship with God, Christ comes to mediate a direct, transformative encounter with the divine.

---

2. Exodus and Wilderness Period

• Context & Characteristics:
  With the institution of the Aaronic priesthood and the establishment of the Tabernacle, Israel receives a formal structure for approaching God. Ritual purity, sacrifice, and a codified liturgy become central.
• Typological Significance:
  • Foreshadowing the Sacrificial System:
    The intricate sacrificial rites point forward to Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice. In contrast to the repeated animal offerings, Jesus’ sacrifice is complete and perfect, fulfilling the law (cf. Hebrews 9–10).
  • Mediator Role:
    Just as Aaron and his descendants mediated between God and Israel, Christ serves as the ultimate mediator, reconciling humanity with God.

---

3. Conquest and Judges Period

• Context & Characteristics:
  This era is marked by decentralized worship. Local altars, charismatic leaders, and prophets provide religious leadership even as the formal priesthood exists.
• Typological Significance:
  • A Transition Toward a Unifying Priesthood:
    The varied expressions of worship and leadership in this period underscore the need for a central, unifying figure.
  • Anticipating the Universal Priesthood of Christ:
    Christ transcends local and fragmented forms of worship. He establishes a spiritual community (the body of believers) that unites all under one eternal priesthood—a fulfillment of the scattered and provisional practices of this era.

---

4. Monarchical Era (United and Divided Kingdoms)

• Context & Characteristics:
  The building of the Temple in Jerusalem under Solomon centralizes worship. The priesthood is elevated as it works in tandem with the monarchy to enforce covenant faithfulness and ritual purity.
• Typological Significance:
  • Centralization of Divine Presence:
    The Temple becomes the focal point for encountering God. In the New Testament, Christ is described as the true temple (cf. John 2:19–21) and as the mediator of a new covenant.
  • Christ as King and Priest:
    While the kings ruled and the priests administered the sacrifices, Jesus uniquely embodies both roles—ruling as King and interceding as High Priest, thereby uniting the royal and liturgical aspects of Israel’s identity.

---

5. Exilic and Post-Exilic Era

• Context & Characteristics:
  After the destruction of the Temple, Jewish religious life shifts focus from a centralized sanctuary to the preservation of sacred texts, law, and community identity.
• Typological Significance:
  • Internalization of Priesthood:
    With the physical temple gone, the role of mediation moves from an external structure to an internal, spiritual reality.
  • Christ’s Spiritual Priesthood:
    Jesus’ priesthood is not limited by temple walls. His mediatory work establishes an enduring, spiritual temple—the church—where believers are drawn into a living, dynamic relationship with God (cf. 1 Peter 2:5).
  • Renewal and Restoration:
    Just as post-exilic leaders worked to restore the community’s identity and faithfulness, Christ’s priesthood offers a restoration of the covenant relationship, renewing and redefining what it means to be God’s people.

---

Summary

Each biblical era not only reflects a stage in the development of Israel’s priestly system but also symbolically anticipates the coming of Christ:

• From the mysterious and eternal priesthood of Melchizedek in the Patriarchal Era,
• To the structured sacrificial system of the Exodus,
• Through the transitional and diverse practices of the Conquest and Judges,
• To the centralized, covenant-enforcing priesthood of the Monarchical Era,
• And finally, to the reformed, internalized mediation of the Exilic period—

Jesus emerges as the fulfillment of all these types, embodying a priesthood that is eternal, perfect, and all-encompassing. His work as mediator, sacrifice, and king brings together and completes the story that each era hinted at, establishing a new and lasting covenant between God and humanity.

* * * * * * * *

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

The Torah as the Rhetoric of Priesthood 

What Is the Difference between the Levitical and the Aaronic Priesthood?

The Priesthood Changed… and With It, the Law 

* * * * * * * *

The Jewish Priesthood of Ancient Israel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The priesthood of ancient Israel was the class of male individuals, who, according to the Hebrew Bible, were patrilineal descendants from Aaron (the elder brother of Moses) and the tribe of Levi, who served in the Tabernacle, Solomon's Temple and Second Temple until the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE. Their temple role included animal sacrifice. The priests (Hebrew kohanim) are viewed as continuing in the Kohen families of rabbinical Judaism.

Hebrew Bible

Illustration of Aaron's lineage from the 1493 Nuremberg Chronicle.

The earliest priest mentioned in the Bible, Melchizedek, was a priest of the Most High and a contemporary of Abram.^[1] The first priest mentioned of another god is Potipherah priest of On, whose daughter Asenath married Joseph in Egypt. The third priest to be mentioned is Jethro, priest of Midian, and Moses' father in law.^[2]

The first mention of an Israelite priesthood occurs in Exodus 40:15: "And thou shalt anoint them, as thou didst anoint their father [Aaron], that they may minister unto me in the priest's office: for their anointing shall surely be an everlasting priesthood throughout their generations." (KJV, 1611) Among these priests a High Priest was anointed (first mentioned in Leviticus 21:10), to serve in unique functions, such as entering the Holy of Holies once yearly on the Day of Atonement. The priesthood was associated with the tribe of Levi, from whom Aaron descended.

Sacrifices and rituals

The Israelite priests were to officiate at many offerings prescribed under the Law of Moses, including the burnt offering, meal offering, dough offering, sin offering, guilt offering, release of the scapegoat, peace offering, heave offering, drink offering, incense offering, thank offering, etc., throughout the liturgical year. In addition, they would engage in many different rituals, such as the priestly blessing, the red heifer, the redemption of the firstborn, and various purification rituals.

Garments

The garments of the Israelite priests and high priests are described, and prescribed, in detail in Leviticus. For the high priest these include a priestly tunic, linen undergarments, sash, robe, priestly turban, ephod (with Urim and Thummim), and a priestly breastplate with 12 stones representing the twelve tribes of Israel. The priests served in rotating priestly divisions.

Critical scholarship

The starting point of much critical scholarship of the priesthood in ancient Israel is the thesis of Julius Wellhausen that biblical Israelite history is redacted and represents three stages:^[3]

1. non Levitical priests
2. Levitical priests
3. Aaronids and Levites

However, Wellhausen's views depend on some critical, but unproven, assumptions, and some scholars consider that the study of the cult and priesthood of ancient Israel is still in its infancy compared to other areas of biblical studies.^[4]

References

1. ^ Genesis 14:18–20
2. ^ William R. Millar Priesthood in ancient Israel 2001
3. ^ Cross, Frank Moore (1997) [1973]. "8: The Priestly Houses of Early Israel: The Classical View of Israel's Early Priesthood". Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic: Essays in the History of the Religion of Israel (reprint ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 195. ISBN 9780674091764. Retrieved 16 January 2023. One of the pillars of Julius Wellhausen's great synthesis of the history of Israelite religion was his reconstruction of the history of the [...].
4. ^ Priesthood and cult in ancient Israel ed. Gary A. Anderson, Saul M. Olyan - 1991 "PREFACE The study of the cult and priesthood of ancient Israel is still very much in its infancy. This is surprising in light of how the field of biblical studies has grown over the last century and the myriads of publications it has ..."