Process Philosophy's Antecedents: A Family Tree of Dynamic Process Ontologies, Part 2

Process Philosophy's Antecedents

A Family Tree of Dynamic Process Ontologies

Part 2

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Philosophical ontologies study the nature of being and existence and is a subdiscipline of metaphysics. Broadly, formal ontologies investigate abstract features while applied ontologies utilize ontological theories and principles to study entities within specific domains.

INTRODUCTION

Building upon yesterday’s foundational overview of dynamic process ontologies, this second part traces the historical unfolding of processual thought within both religious and philosophical traditions. By mapping these antecedents, we see a continuous thread of dynamic, relational, and becoming-centered ontologies weaving through ancient cosmologies, classical philosophies, medieval theologies, and modern scientific insights.

This family tree highlights the converging streams that have shaped contemporary process thought — an evolving tapestry of ideas that resists static categories and instead affirms movement, change, and interconnectedness at the heart of reality.

I.

MAJOR PHILOSOPHICAL AND RELIGIOUS ONTOLOGIES

• Includes both process and non-process traditions
• Grouped by era and tradition

I. Ancient Ontologies (Pre-Axial Age to Early Axial)

• Animism & Totemism – World as alive, all beings with spirit (prehistoric–indigenous)
• Polytheism – Many gods with various domains (Egyptian, Greek, Norse, Canaanite, Hindu)
• Henotheism – One supreme god among others (early Israelite, some Vedic thought)
• Pantheism – God and world are identical (early Upanishads, Stoicism)
• Panentheism – God in the world, world in God, but God transcends (Upanishadic Hinduism, some early Christian mysticism)

II. Classical Philosophical Ontologies (Axial Age)

• Platonic Idealism – Eternal Forms/Ideas as true reality
• Aristotelian Substance Ontology – Reality composed of substances with essential forms
• Atomism – Reality built from indivisible units (Democritus, Epicurus)
• Stoicism – Rational Logos as immanent in all things
• Buddhist Ontology (Śūnyatā) – Emptiness of inherent existence; interdependence
• Hindu Advaita Vedanta – Non-dual Brahman as ultimate reality
• Confucian Relational Ontology – Being defined by relationships within a moral cosmos

III. Medieval Ontologies

• Neoplatonism – Emanation of reality from the One (Plotinus, Augustine)
• Scholastic Theistic Realism – Being grounded in God’s essence (Aquinas)
• Islamic Kalam Ontology – God's will as ontologically fundamental (Ash'arite occasionalism)
• Jewish Kabbalistic Ontology – Emanations (Sefirot) from Ein Sof (Infinite)
• Nominalism (Ockham) – Denial of universals as real; reality as particulars

IV. Modern Philosophical Ontologies (Post-Renaissance)

• Cartesian Dualism – Mind (res cogitans) and Matter (res extensa)
• Monism (Spinoza) – Single substance = God or Nature
• Empiricist Ontology (Locke, Hume) – Reality apprehended through sense perception
• Idealism (Kant, Hegel) – Reality shaped or constituted by mind/spirit
• Materialism / Physicalism – Only matter (or energy) is real
• Process Ontology (Whitehead) – Reality is becoming, not static being
• Phenomenology (Husserl, Heidegger) – Reality as experienced; being-in-the-world
• Existentialist Ontology (Sartre) – Existence precedes essence; freedom as ontological core

V. Contemporary / Postmodern Ontologies

• Post-Structuralist Ontologies – Reality constructed via language, power, and difference
• Relational Ontology (Process, Feminist, Ecological) – Being is constituted by relations
• Object-Oriented Ontology – Objects exist independently of relations or perception
• Quantum Ontologies (Field, Information) – Reality as fields, energy, information (modern physics)
• Panpsychism – Mind or experience as fundamental aspect of all reality
• Integral / Metamodern Ontologies – Integrative approaches blending multiplicity (Wilber, metamodern thinkers)

VI. Comparative Family Tree Overview

a diagrammatic family tree of ontologies reflecting both chronology and influence patterns.

A family tree of Ontologies
by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

A family tree of Ontologies showing Processual Elements
by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

II.

MAJOR PROCESS-BASED PHILOSOPHICAL AND RELIGIOUS ONTOLOGIES

• Includes PROCESS traditions only
• Grouped by era and tradition

I. Proto-Process Ontologies (Pre-Axial)

• Animism & Totemism – All things in flux, spirited; relational cosmos
• Indigenous Cosmologies – Cycles of nature as ongoing becoming

II. Emerging Philosophical Processes (Axial)

• Heraclitus (Greek) – "All is flux," the Logos as ordering flow
• Buddhism (India) – Śūnyatā (emptiness), interdependent arising (pratītyasamutpāda)
• Upanishadic Hinduism (India) – Brahman as evolving cosmic reality
• Daoism (China) – Dao as the ever-flowing way of nature

III. Process Threads in Classical Philosophy

• Stoicism – Logos as living reason, immanent in nature
• Neoplatonism (Plotinus) – Emanation as a dynamic outflow from the One
• Early Christian Mystics – God as flowing presence (Gregory of Nyssa, Dionysius)

IV. Medieval and Islamic Contributions

• Kabbalah – Emanations (Sefirot), divine dynamism in Jewish mysticism
• Islamic Philosophical Theology (Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, Mulla Sadra) – Substantial motion (harakat jawhariyya), all beings in motion
• Christian Processions (East & West) – Theological language of Trinity as dynamic relations (though often staticized)

V. Early Modern Dynamics

• Nicholas of Cusa – Coincidence of opposites, unfolding creation
• Giordano Bruno – Infinite worlds, ever-unfolding universe
• Spinoza – God or Nature as single substance with infinite modes (proto-processual)

VI. Modern Precursors and Theorists

• Hegel – Dialectic as unfolding Geist (Spirit)
• Bergson – Creative evolution, élan vital
• Whitehead (Process Philosophy) – Becoming as metaphysical core; God as primordial, consequent, and superjective nature
• Teilhard de Chardin – Omega Point, evolutionary theology

VII. Contemporary Developments

• Process Theology (Cobb, Suchocki, Hartshorne) – Divine relationality and ongoing creation
• Ecological and Relational Ontologies – Panpsychism, Deep Ecology
• Quantum Ontologies – Dynamic fields, relational entanglement
• Metamodern Ontology – Integrative, open-ended becoming (e.g., Hanzi Freinacht)

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

CONCLUDING REFLECTION

In retracing the roots of process-oriented philosophies and theologies, we discover that what many modern thinkers articulate as “process” is neither a novel invention nor a narrow metaphysical project. Rather, it is a recurring intuition — surfacing in every age — that reality itself is relational, emergent, and perpetually in becoming.

By recognizing these antecedents, we anchor today’s processual frameworks within a broader historical dialogue, affirming both their ancient resonance and their contemporary relevance for philosophy, science, and faith alike.

Process Philosophy's Antecedents: A Family Tree of Dynamic Process Ontologies, Part 1

Process Philosophy's Antecedents

A Family Tree of Dynamic Process Ontologies

Part 1

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Philosophical ontologies study the nature of being and existence and is a subdiscipline of metaphysics. Broadly, formal ontologies investigate abstract features while applied ontologies utilize ontological theories and principles to study entities within specific domains.

To begin, a process ontology is a way of modeling and representing knowledge about processes, focusing on their dynamic nature and relationships rather than as static entities. It's used in religion, philosophy and computer science, with applications ranging from understanding fundamental reality to describing complex business operations.

In religion, process ontology emphasizes that God is not a static, unchanging entity but is intimately involved in the dynamic and ever-changing processes of the universe.

In philosophy, process ontology challenges traditional views that emphasize enduring substances, arguing instead that reality is fundamentally composed of processes, events, and relationships. This perspective, also known as process philosophy or process metaphysics, is associated with thinkers like Alfred North Whitehead. Some philosophers argue that process ontology offers a more accurate representation of the world's flux and becoming.

In computer science and knowledge representation, a process ontology provides a structured way to model-and-reason-about the components and relationships within an observed process. This is useful for tasks like (i) Modeling workflows: Describing the steps, inputs, outputs, and dependencies of a process. (ii) Developing knowledge-based systems: Creating systems that can understand and reason about processes. (iii) Enabling process analysis and optimization: Identifying bottlenecks, inefficiencies, and areas for improvement in a process.

INTRODUCTION

Throughout the history of thought, certain currents have continually resurfaced — currents that reject static conceptions of reality in favor of dynamic, relational, and evolving understandings of existence. Process Philosophy, particularly as formalized by Alfred North Whitehead, is often perceived as a modern or even postmodern development. Yet, when viewed through a broader historical and cross-cultural lens, it becomes evident that processual insights have long been seeded in the philosophical and theological traditions of East and West alike.

This survey traces a family tree of dynamic ontologies — spanning ancient Greek thought, Buddhist impermanence, Islamic metaphysical insights, dialectical European philosophy, and the revelations of modern quantum science. Each thread contributes a distinctive voice to the chorus affirming that reality is a living, unfolding process.

In this spirit, Metamodern Process Philosophy emerges not as a break with tradition but as a converging stream of ancient wisdom, critical modernity, and contemporary scientific discovery. This synthesis offers a fertile ground for reimagining metaphysics, ethics, and the nature of existence in an interconnected and ever-becoming world.

---

1. Heraclitus (c. 500 BCE) — “All is Flux”

• The Greek philosopher Heraclitus declared that change is the fundamental nature of reality. His famous aphorism, “You cannot step into the same river twice,” highlighted a worldview where all things are in perpetual motion.

• Process Resonance: Heraclitus affirmed becoming over static being, introducing an early Western articulation of dynamic ontology.

---

2. Buddhist Doctrine of Impermanence (Anicca) (c. 300 BCE)

• Buddhism, originating in India, teaches that all phenomena are impermanent (Anicca), subject to arising and passing away, emphasizing the interdependent nature of all existence.

• Process Resonance: Reality is transient, interdependent, and relational — a natural alignment with process metaphysics’ rejection of fixed essences.

---

3. Islamic Philosophy — Al-Farabi, Avicenna (c. 1000 CE)

• Islamic philosophers synthesized Aristotelian and Neoplatonic philosophy, emphasizing dynamic creation, contingency, and continual existential dependence on the Divine.

• Process Resonance: Though not overtly processual, Islamic philosophy nurtured metaphysical frameworks that valued dynamic creation and relational existence.

---

4. Mulla Sadra (c. 1600 CE) — Substantial Motion (al-ḥaraka al-jawhariyya)

• Mulla Sadra’s revolutionary doctrine argued that substance itself is in constant ontological motion, not merely its accidents or qualities. This notion placed change and becoming at the heart of existence.

• Process Resonance: A striking philosophical precursor to process thought — proposing a world of ontological flux upheld by God’s ongoing creative act.

---

5. G.W.F. Hegel (c. 1800 CE) — Dialectical Becoming

• Hegel’s dialectics proposed that reality unfolds through the triadic process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, embedding development and transformation into the core of history and metaphysics.

• Process Resonance: Reality as a self-developing, dynamic process — an essential prelude to relational and evolutionary metaphysical systems.

---

6. Alfred North Whitehead (c. 1920 CE) — Process Philosophy

• Whitehead constructed a systematic metaphysics where reality consists of “actual occasions” — discrete events of becoming interconnected in webs of relation.

• Process Resonance: Whitehead’s philosophy integrated ontology, cosmology, and ethics under the principle of creativity and relational becoming, offering a comprehensive processual worldview.

---

7. Quantum Ontology — Field Theory & Emergence (21st Century)

• Quantum physics reveals a universe of fields, probabilities, and emergent properties rather than static substances. Concepts like wavefunction collapse and quantum entanglement reflect a world defined by dynamic interrelations.

• Process Resonance: Scientific models affirm a reality in constant flux, resonating deeply with philosophical visions of process and emergence.

---

CONCLUSION

A Converging Stream of Becoming

Process Philosophy emerges not from a vacuum but from a global and historical tapestry of insights — where ancient wisdom traditions, classical metaphysical systems, and contemporary scientific understandings coalesce. Each tradition contributes a vital thread:

• Heraclitus — Change is the only constant.

• Buddhism — All is impermanent and interconnected.

• Islamic Philosophy — Dynamic creation and contingent existence.

• Mulla Sadra — Substance itself is a motion of becoming.

• Hegel — History and reality unfold through dialectical processes.

• Whitehead — Reality is constituted by creative relational events.

• Quantum Ontology — The universe dances in fields of dynamic potential.

Together, each aspect of process thought affirm a deep, metamodern truth: "The universe is not a static structure but a living, unfolding, evolving process.

Metamodern Process Philosophy stands at the crossroads of ancient metaphysics, postmodern critique, and scientific discovery — offering a dynamic, integrated vision of reality. It invites us to see existence as a vibrant, relational tapestry, forever in the act of becoming.

---

Final Reflection

In recognizing the diverse roots of process philosophy, we are reminded that the human quest to understand reality has always been marked by a reverence for movement, change, and connection. Far from being an isolated philosophical curiosity, process thought represents a universal intuition echoed across cultures, religions, and sciences. Its metamodern expression today serves as both a bridge and a horizon — bridging ancient wisdom with contemporary inquiry, and opening a horizon of hope for a world in search of deeper relational meaning. 

Process philosophy, in this light, is less an endpoint and more a continual invitation: to embrace the flux of life with creativity, courage, and a profound sense of belonging to the unfolding cosmos.

Commonalities between Islam, Process, and Quantum Science

Commonalities between Islam,

Process, and Quantum Science

An Integration of Islamic Substantial Motion,

Process Philosophy, and Quantum Field Theory

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT

INTRODUCTION

In the evolving dialogue between metaphysics, philosophy, and modern science, certain convergences stand out as particularly illuminating. One such convergence is the shared resonance between Mulla Sadra’s theosophic concept of Substantial Motion, Alfred North Whitehead’s Process Philosophy, and the scientific insights of contemporary Quantum Field Theory. Though these systems arise from distinct cultural, intellectual, and disciplinary contexts, they each articulate a vision of reality grounded in dynamism, relationality, and ceaseless becoming.

• Mulla Sadra’s theosophic doctrine of Substantial Motion asserts that not only cosmic coincidence, but the very substance of all things, is in perpetual flux—a groundbreaking metaphysical stance within Islamic thought.

• Whitehead’s Process Philosophy, formulated within the early 20th-century Western tradition, describes reality not as a collection of static substances but as a web of interconnected events or “actual occasions.”

• Meanwhile, Quantum Field Theory, the bedrock of modern physics, reveals a universe woven from dynamic fields, probabilistic events, and continuous processes of interaction.

Reference
Rereading Mulla Sadra’s Substantial Motion: Bridging Whiteheadian Process Philosophy and Quantum Ontology by Abolfazl Minaee

Abstract

This study undertakes a profound exploration of the conceptual convergences among Mulla Sadra’s doctrine of al-ḥarakat al-jawhariyya (substantial motion), Alfred North Whitehead’s process philosophy, and contemporary quantum ontology, aiming to forge a novel metaphysical synthesis that bridges Islamic philosophy with modern philosophy of science.

Through an intricate comparative and conceptual analysis, it argues that Sadra’s dynamic ontology of becoming offers a robust framework for interpreting Whiteheaud’s processual metaphysics while simultaneously providing a unique lens to address interpretive challenges in quantum mechanics, such as wave function collapse, quantum entanglement, and superposition.

By meticulously identifying shared ontological commitments to flux, relationality, and emergence, this paper proposes substantial motion as a unifying metaphysical paradigm that transcends cultural and disciplinary boundaries.

This interdisciplinary endeavor not only fosters a cross-cultural dialogue but also contributes to a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the nature of being in a quantum world, inviting philosophers to reconsider the foundations of reality through a processual lens.

REVIEW OF SADRA'S PROCESSUAL ONTOLOGY

1. Islamic Metaphysical Origin (Mulla Sadra, 17th c.)

• Philosopher: Mulla Sadra (Islamic Iran, Transcendent Theosophy)
• Core Idea: Not only accidents (qualities, quantities) but substance itself is in constant motion.
• Classical Aristotelian thought saw substances as fixed while qualities (color, place, size) change.
• Mulla Sadra flipped this: "Substance is in continuous ontological flow—changing, becoming, never fixed."

Result:

• The universe is a ceaselessly renewing tide of being.
• God is the ultimate cause of this ongoing creative flow.
• Existence itself is dynamic, becoming is reality.

2. Comparison to Islamic Theology:

• Though built within Shi'a Islamic metaphysics, Sadra's idea was philosophical, bridging theology, cosmology, and ontology.

• It aligns with Islamic concepts of God as ever-creating (al-Khaliq) but isn't core to Qur'anic doctrine.

3. Comparison to Physical Science

Is Sadra's theosophy a physical science? No—but...

• It’s a metaphysical doctrine, not derived from physics experiments.

• It philosophically anticipates later ideas like process ontology and dynamic fields in physics.

• Contemporary physics (e.g., field theory, quantum fluctuations) finds resonance, but substantial motion remains a philosophical stance, not a scientific theory.

4. Comparison to Process Philosophy

• Whitehead’s Process Philosophy similarly holds:

• > “Actuality is a process of becoming, not a substance persisting through change.”

• Both reject static substance metaphysics.

• Both suggest reality is constituted by dynamic, interrelated processes.

5. Summary

• Aspect - Substantial Motion
• Origin - Islamic Philosophy (Mulla Sadra)
• Domain - Metaphysics, not physics
• Core Concept - Substance itself is in continuous change
• Relation to Islam - A philosophical reading within Shi'a tradition
• Modern Resonance - Similar to Process Philosophy & Quantum Process
• Science? - No, but overlaps conceptually with dynamic field theories

6. Diagram

Here is a visual alignment of Mulla Sadra’s Substantial Motion, Whitehead’s Process Philosophy, and Quantum Field Theory:

• Mulla Sadra (Islamic Metaphysics) — Theosophical, substance in motion

• Whitehead (Process Philosophy) — Ontological, becoming and relationality

• Quantum Field Theory (Modern Physics) — Empirical, fluctuating quantum fields

• They converge on dynamic ontology, relational being, and processual becoming, though each arises from distinct traditions: metaphysical, philosophical, or scientific.

CONCLUSION

The alignment of Substantial Motion, Process Philosophy, and Quantum Field Theory reveals a fascinating cross-cultural and interdisciplinary convergence: reality, at its deepest levels, is dynamic, interrelated, and perpetually in motion. Whether articulated through the theological metaphysics of Mulla Sadra, the philosophical constructs of Whitehead, or the empirical models of quantum physics, this shared vision suggests a profound metaphysical intuition running beneath the surface of human thought across centuries and civilizations.

Rather than isolated insights, these traditions together underscore a metamodern realization: existence is a flowing, unfolding tapestry of becoming. This synthesis offers not just a conceptual framework but also a powerful invitation—to embrace a worldview that honors process, fosters relational understanding, and recognizes the deep, dynamic interconnectedness of all things

--

A Poem
A Dance of Becoming
by R.E. Slateŕ and ChatGPT

From ancient scrolls and scholar’s pen,
To quantum fields beyond our ken,
A single thread through time does weave —
All things in motion, all things perceive.

Sadra saw the world in flow,
A ceaseless pulse in all we know.
Whitehead drew the cosmic chart,
Of fleeting moments, and worlds that start.

The physicist in labs confined,
Found dancing fields that seeming fate designed.
Across vast spaces and through the small,
Cosmic processes bind, enfolding all.

Then let us learn this subtle art —
To see the whole within each part.
The world as song, as shifting stream,
As living, breathing, woven dream.

Timelines of Western Philosophy

School of Athens

Wikipedia article link

First Observation

The most famous philosophers of ancient times move within an imposing Renaissance architecture which is inspired by Bramante's project for the renewal of the early Christian basilica of St Peter. Some of these are easily recognizable. In the centre Plato points upwards with a finger and holds his book Timeus in his hand, flanked by Aristotle with Ethics; Pythagoras is shown in the foreground intent on explaining the diatesseron. Diogenes is lying on the stairs with a dish, while the pessimist philosopher, Heracleitus, a portrait of Michelangelo, is leaning against a block of marble, writing on a sheet of paper. Michelangelo was in those years executing the paintings in the nearby Sistine Chapel. On the right we see Euclid, who is teaching geometry to his pupils, Zoroaster holding the heavenly sphere and Ptolemy holding the earthly sphere. The personage on the extreme right with the black beret is a self-portrait of Raphael.

Second Observation

The work above depicts a scene of ancient Greek philosophy. Aristotle walks with his teacher and mentor Plato (whose appearance is modeled on Raphael’s close friend, fellow Renaissance thinker and painter Leonardo da Vinci.) The figure of Plato (center left, in orange and purple) is pointing upwards, symbolizing the Platonic ideology of philosophical idealism. The more youthful Aristotle (center right, in blue and brown) has his hand outstretched in front of him, encapsulating Aristotle’s pragmatic empirical mode of thought. Aristotle examined affairs practically as they are; Plato examined affairs idealistically as he thought they ought to be.

Socratic philosophy is a method of questioning and dialogue that encourages critical thinking and self-examination. It was developed by the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates of Athens (c. 470–399 BC).

Socratic method

• Involves a teacher asking thought-provoking questions to students
• Focuses on understanding the underlying beliefs of participants
• Encourages students to ask questions and think critically
• Creates a classroom environment that's productive and not intimidating

Socratic ideas

• Philosophy should have practical results that improve society
• Knowledge of virtue is necessary to become virtuous
• All evil acts are committed out of ignorance
• Committing an injustice is worse than suffering an injustice
• The only thing one can be certain of is one's ignorance
• The unexamined life is not worth living

Socrates' influence

• Socrates' ideas influenced Western philosophy and Classical antiquity
• He's considered the father of modern education
• His ideas are reflected in the works of Plato, Xenophon, Søren Kierkegaard, and Friedrich Nietzsche
• His ideas are also reflected in modern educational frameworks

Platonic philosophy is a system of thought that originated with the ancient Greek philosopher Plato (c.427-347 BC). It's based on the idea that the physical world is a reflection of unchanging Forms, or Ideas, which are the true reality.

Key concepts

• Forms: Abstract objects that are non-physical, timeless, and unchangeable
• Theory of Forms: The idea that the physical world is not as real as Forms
• Platonic idealism: Another name for the Theory of Forms
• Platonic realism: Another name for the Theory of Forms
• Platonism's influence
• Platonism has had a profound impact on Western thought.

Examples of Forms

• Some examples of Forms include goodness, beauty, equality, bigness, likeness, unity, being, sameness, difference, change, and changelessness.

Platonic love

• The term "platonic love" refers to a relationship between two people based on close intimacy and attraction, but without sexual intimacy.

Platonic society

• Plato believed that a good society is based on virtue, including friendship, freedom, justice, wisdom, courage, and moderation.

Aristotelian philosophy, a tradition rooted in the work of Aristotle (c.384-322 BC), a polymath, whose works ranged across all philosophical fields emphasizing deductive logic, inductive methods, and the study of natural philosophy and metaphysics, including ethics and political theory, with a focus on virtue and the pursuit of human flourishing.

Here's a more detailed breakdown of key aspects of Aristotelian philosophy:

Core Concepts

• Deductive and Inductive Logic:
• Aristotle is credited with the development of formal logic, using deductive reasoning (syllogisms) and inductive methods to analyze and understand the world.

• Metaphysics:
• Aristotle explored the nature of reality, including the concepts of substance, form, matter, potentiality, and actuality, seeking to understand the fundamental principles of existence.

• Ethics:
• Aristotle's ethics, outlined in his Nicomachean Ethics, emphasizes the importance of developing virtuous character through habit and practice, leading to eudaimonia (flourishing or happiness).

• Politics:
• Aristotle's political philosophy, as explored in Politics, examines different forms of government and the ideal state, focusing on the common good and the importance of citizens' participation in public life.

• Natural Philosophy:
• Aristotle's natural philosophy, encompassing physics, biology, and other natural sciences, sought to understand the natural world through observation and reason, focusing on the causes and purposes of natural phenomena.

• Four Causes:
• Aristotle's theory of causation involves four types of causes: material, formal, efficient, and final, which help explain the nature and development of things.

• Teleology:
• Aristotle believed that everything has a purpose or telos, and that understanding the purpose of something is crucial to understanding its nature.

Key Areas of Influence

• Western Scholasticism:
• Aristotelian philosophy became the intellectual framework of Western Scholasticism during the Middle Ages, influencing theology and philosophy.

• Virtue Ethics:
• Aristotle's ethics has inspired the field of virtue ethics, which emphasizes character development and the pursuit of excellence.

• Contemporary Philosophy:
• Aristotle's ideas continue to influence contemporary philosophy, particularly in areas like metaphysics, political philosophy, and the philosophy of science.

• Renaissance:
• Aristotelian works were the subject of renewed interest in the Renaissance, with many commentaries on Aristotle's works being composed during this period.

• Thomas Aquinas:
• St. Thomas Aquinas, in the 13th century, attempted to reconcile Aristotelian philosophy and science with Christian dogma, influencing the theology and worldview of the Roman Catholic Church.
• 
  

• 

  Amazon link

  
  

Timeline of Western Philosophies

I Ancient Philosophy (Pre-Socratic to Hellenistic)

• Pre-Socratics (6th-5th centuries BCE):
• Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes, Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Zeno of Elea, Anaxagoras, Democritus.

• Classical Greek Philosophy (5th-4th centuries BCE):
• Socrates, Plato, Aristotle.

• Hellenistic Philosophy (3rd century BCE - 1st century CE):
• Epicurus, Zeno of Citium (founder of Stoicism), Pyrrhon of Elis.

• Roman Philosophy (1st century BCE - 5th century CE):
• Cicero, Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Plotinus.

II Medieval Philosophy (5th-15th centuries CE)

• Early Medieval (5th-10th centuries):
• Augustine of Hippo.

• High and Late Medieval (11th-15th centuries):
• Boethius, Thomas Aquinas, William of Ockham.

• Islamic Philosophy:
• Al-Kindi, Avicenna, Averroes, Al-Ghazali.

• Jewish Philosophy:
• Maimonides.

III Renaissance and Early Modern Philosophy (15th-18th centuries)

• Renaissance:
• Machiavelli, Pico della Mirandola.

• Early Modern (16th-18th centuries):
• Francis Bacon, René Descartes, John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Isaac Newton.

• Enlightenment:
• John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, Voltaire, Montesquieu.

IV Modern and Contemporary Philosophy (19th-21st centuries)

• 19th Century:
• Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Friedrich Nietzsche, Karl Marx, Søren Kierkegaard, John Stuart Mill.

• 20th Century:
• Bertrand Russell, G.E. Moore (Analytic Philosophy), Friedrich Waismann, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Martin Heidegger (Continental Philosophy), Hannah Arendt.

• 21st Century:
• Contemporary analytic and continental philosophy, feminist philosophy, postcolonial philosophy, philosophy of science, ethics, and political philosophy.

click to enlarge

A Timeline of Western Philosophers

600 B.C.E. Thales Anaximander Anaximenes Pythagoras Xenophanes 500 B.C.E. Heraclitus Parmenides Protagoras Zeno of Elea Hippias Empedocles Leucippus Anaxagoras Democritus Socrates 400 B.C.E. Aristippus Antisthenes Xenophon Plato Diogenes Euclid Aristotle Xenocrates Pyrrho 300 B.C.E. Epicurus Zeno of Citium Timon Archimedes Chrysippus Eratosthenes 200 B.C.E. Carneades 100 B.C.E. Lucretius Cicero C.E. Philo Seneca 100 Epictetus Marcus Aurelius 200 Sextus Empiricus Plotinus Porphyry 300 400 Hypatia Augustine 500 Boethius 600 700 800 al-Kindi Erigena 900 al-Faràbi Saadiah 1000 Ibn Sina Ibn Gabirol Anselm al-Ghazàlì 1100 Abelard Ibn Daud Peter Lombard Ibn Rushd Maimonides 1200 Fibonacci Grosseteste Albert the Great Roger Bacon Aquinas Bonaventure Siger Boetius of Dacia 1300 Scotus Eckhart Marsilius of Padua Ockham Gersonides Buridan Crescas 1400 Cusa Valla Pico della Mirandola Ficino 1500 Erasmus Machiavelli Thomas More Paracelsus Copernicus Ramus 1550 Teresa of Avila Montaigne Bruno Suarez 1600 Kepler Charron Mersenne Francis Bacon Grotius Galileo Herbert of Cherbury Gassendi Princess Elizabeth Fermat Queen KristinaDescartes HobbesFilmer 1650 Glanvill Geulincx Pascal Henry More Cordemoy Nicole Cudworth Cavendish Arnauld Cumberland Rohault Foucher Boyle Malebranche Pufendorf Spinoza Newton Conway Régis Locke Masham Toland Bayle Souvré 1700 Clarke Shaftesbury Norris Leibniz Berkeley Cockburn Vico Mandeville Hutcheson Butler Wolff Gay Hume La Mettrie HartleyMontesquieu 1750 Euler Condillac Price d'Alembert Voltaire Diderot Rousseau Bayes d'Holbach Helvétius Smith Jefferson Reid Paine Lessing Burke Kant Wollstonecraft Bentham Mendelssohn Stewart Godwin Schiller Malthus Paley Fichte 1800 Gaussde StaëlSchelling Schleiermacher LaplaceHegel LamarckSaint-Simon FourierSchopenhauer Whately Babbage LobachevskyJohn AustinComte WhewellJames MillProudhon BolzanoEmersonFeuerbach De MorganFullerKierkegaard BooleThoreau 1850 RiemannSojourner TruthMarx DarwinTaylorEngels Hamilton MendelJ. S. MillLotze Spencer VennAnthonyBakunin CantorBrentano 1875 Sidgwick DedekindClifford PeirceCaird MachGreen FregeDiltheyNietzsche CarrollBosanquet PeanoStantonRitchie DurkheimJamesRoyce GilmanBradley ParetoVeblen 1900 PlanckFreudWeberBergson PoincareMeinongDuboisCook Wilson DuhemHusserlAddamsSeth ZermeloMooreCroce EinsteinJungGoldmanVaihinger BohrWatsonLuxemburgOtto HilbertUnamuno AdlerLeninSaussure LukasciewiczDeweyTrotskyBuber RussellWhitehead MeadAlexanderMcTaggart KeynesBroadLukácsSantayana 1925 ReichenbachLovejoyRossBerdyaev HeisenbergSchlickKelsenHeidegger NeurathRamseyHartmannCassirer GödelPerryGramsciCollingwood SchrödingerC. I. LewisIngarden AyerBachelardMao ZedongMaritain WaismannDayOrtega y Gasset TarskiCarnapBlanshard E. NagelPopperGandhi HorneySartre RyleH.H. PriceLangerCamus StevensonHayekJaspers Wittgenstein Adorno TuringPrichardMarcelBeauvoir 1950 von NeumannLorenzWisdomTillich HopperArrowHareMerleau-Ponty PolyaSkinnerBerlinWeil ChurchAnscombeRandHorkheimer FeiglAustinHampshireArendt HempelStrawsonKurt BaierGadamer QuineGriceHartLacan GoodmanSellarsHabermas KuhnSmartMarcuse FeynmanBergmannRicoeur GettierArmstrongKingAlthusser ChomskyChisholmDerrida SearleLakatosRawlsFoucault KripkeE.O. WilsonDeleuze 1975 FeyerabendThomsonSingerEco DummettPutnamDworkinLyotard DavidsonT. NagelMidgleyDaly HofstadterRortyNozickCixous MandelbrotKimReganLe Dœuff HarawayGilliganKristeva MinskyAppiahNoddingsIrigaray Lehrer Annette Baier Held HardingRuddickHoagland KemerlingMacKinnon DennettNussbaumBordo Westhooks 2000