Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Showing posts with label Love - A Language for the Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Love - A Language for the Church. Show all posts

Sunday, April 19, 2026

When Christianity Forgets Christ & Witness Becomes Propaganda


Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

When Christianity Forgets Christ
& Witness Becomes Propaganda

A Christian Confession of Faith v Power

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT


You cannot serve God and mammon.
- Jesus (Matthew 6:24)

Put your sword back into its place.
- Jesus (Matthew 26:52)

They shall beat their swords into plowshares.
- Isaiah (Isaiah 2:4)

Christ Against Empire. Love Against Fear.
- A General Christian Sentiment

Christianity + Power = the Deformation of the Gospel
- A General Christian acknowledgment




On the Corruption of Faith

On Power and Corruption

Where power asks devotion, idolatry has begun.
- R.E. Slater

Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
- Lord Acton

The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.
- Hannah Arendt

Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it.
- Simone Weil

On Religion and Idolatry

The Gospel is Not a Political Ideology.
- R.E. Slater

The greatest danger to Christianity is Christendom.
- Soren Kierkegaard

It is not the violence of evil that most threatens us, but the refusal to resist it.
-Jacques Ellul

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil.
- Dietrich Bonhoeffer

On Justice and Human Dignity

I cannot believe what you say, because I see what you do.
- James Baldwin

Real generosity toward the future lies in giving all to the present.
- Albert Camus

Do not be silent; there is no limit to the power that may be released through you.
- Howard Thurman

On Truth and Ideology

To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle.
- George Orwell

The real test of a person is not how he plays the role he has invented for himself, but how he plays the role destiny has imposed on him.
- Vaclav Havel


Preface

Recently, American Maga-phone and mouthpiece for Maga-Christianity, America's own "Protestant Pope," Franklin Graham, spoke up defending President Trump's aggressive rhetoric against the Catholic Church's Pope Leo XIV who had spoken against the violence being done in the world under the Trump administration, both domestically and internationally (cf., Top MAGA Evangelical Blasted for Urging Pope to Praise Trump).

I would like to respond to Graham's consistent pro-Trumpian rhetoric over the years in providing a  foundational baseline "confessional" statement for the Christian Church in line with Jesus' own person,  actions, ministry, and witness....

Firstly, though we could easily offer a partisan response to Graham, it may be more helpful in providing a theological reply stripped of politics. Moreover, this confession arises in response to consistently recurring forms of Christian rhetoric over the past decade that has been voiced-and-acted-upon in public life - including claims advanced by prominent religious figures who have fused Christian witness with:
  • nationalist idealism,
  • providential political claims,
  • civilizational fear and alarm,
  • apocalyptic eschatology, and
  • ideological certainty.
Such rhetoric requires response - not because Christians should avoid public life - but because public theology, when distorted, can wound and harm both faith and neighbor.

The problem addressed here is not in "Christianity's engagement with society" - but "how" it is engaging with society. That Christianity has accommodated itself to political power - not for the first time, nor for the last - but presently and forcefully. That it's engagement has not only become a staple of Christian news - but has negatively affected Christianity's attitude, national posture, and politicized policies - which must be responded to clearly and vigorously:
When faith seeks protection through political dominance, when religious speech inflates leaders into providential agents, when exclusion is moralized, when coercion is baptized, when cruelty is defended as order, and when nationalism borrows the garments of gospel, theological resistance must become necessary.
The following Christian Confession is offered in the spirit intended. To speak against these politicized inflations of accommodating theological positions....


A CHRISTIAN CONFESSION
of FAITH v. POWER


I. The First Principle: The Gospel Is Not an Ideology

Christian faith is compromised when accommodation to political power displaces allegiance to the ethical, relational, and spiritual center of the way of Jesus.

The problem is not public faith, civic responsibility, or moral engagement in political life.

The problem arises when Christianity is fused with ideological identity, nationalist mythology, coercive social order, or presumptive claims made on behalf of political leaders or movements.

At that point, faith risks becoming not witness, but (oppressive) instrument.

The gospel does not exist to sanctify a nation.

The gospel does not exist to protect a ruling mythology.

The gospel does not exist to baptize grievance.

The gospel calls persons and communities toward truth, compassion, justice, reconciliation, and peace.

Where these are eclipsed, deformation has begun.


II. Seven Marks of Theological Deformation

1. Accommodation to Power

When the church seeks proximity to state, nation, party, or strongman as a source of identity rather than maintaining prophetic distance.

2. Ideological Idealism

When political myths replace moral discernment, and national destiny is narrated in quasi-redemptive terms.

3. Departure from Social and Ethical Responsibility

When concern for the poor, vulnerable, migrants, outsiders, women, and socially marginalized persons is subordinated to exclusion, identity preservation, or grievance.

4. Cruelty Masked as Moral Order

When coercive treatment, forced gender fixation, categorical exclusions, or inequalities are defended as righteousness.

Order detached from compassion becomes domination.

5. Mythologizing of Scripture

When the Bible is abstracted from history and turned into an ideological arsenal.

6. Presumptive Theological Assertions

When divine sanction is claimed where humility would require restraint.

7. Fracture as Fruit

When the result is broken families, ecclesial division, estrangement, fear, and diminished solidarity.

A tree is partly known by its fruits.


III. Against the Inflation of Political Power

We reject the inflation of political leaders into providential figures.

We reject the conferral of messianic overtones upon rulers.

We reject the suggestion that Christianity’s future depends upon loyalty to a political personality.

Such claims do not strengthen faith. They weaken discernment.

They substitute devotion to power for fidelity to truth.


IV. Against Christian Nationalism and Sacralized Violence

We reject the conflation of gospel and nationalism.

We reject the sacralization of violence through expansive just war reasoning.

We reject jingoistic Christianity that mistakes militarized identity for moral seriousness.

Peace is not naivete.

Peace is disciplined moral courage.

A faith centered in Christ cannot make coercion its grammar.


V. On Human Dignity and Relational Worth

We affirm the dignity of persons as irreducible.

No person should be reduced to threat category, cultural symbol, or ideological enemy.

This includes immigrants seeking liberty and justice. This includes women whose gifts and leadership are constrained by rigid systems. This includes trans and gay persons whose humanity is often diminished in the name of moral certainty.

Any theology that requires inequality to sustain itself has already entered crisis.


VI. A Process-Relational Clarification

From a process-relational understanding, divine power is not domination.

It is persuasive lure toward richer forms of coexistence.

Toward justice. Toward beauty. Toward truth. Toward compassion. Toward peace.

Movements shaped by exclusion, supremacy, coercion, or sacralized nationalism stand in contradiction to that divine aim.

Accommodation to power narrows relational possibility. It suppresses novelty. It diminishes mutuality. It closes what should remain open.

And closure is often a form of diminishment.


VII. What We Affirm

We affirm:

A Christianity of prophetic distance from power.

A Christianity of ethical responsibility toward all persons.

A Christianity of interpretive humility.

A Christianity of non-coercive peace.

A Christianity of relational solidarity.

A Christianity measured not by its power to preserve dominance, but by its fidelity to love.


VIII. What We Reject

We reject forms of accommodated Christianity deformed by:

Nationalism.

Supremacy.

Cruelty.

Exclusion.

Ideological absolutism.

Apocalyptic manipulation.

Presumptive religious certainty in service to political power.


Coda

The central Christian question is not whether religion can defend a nation, a party, or a social order. The question is whether Christianity still reflects Christ:

Where witness becomes propaganda, resistance becomes necessary.

Where power eclipses compassion, repentance becomes necessary.

Where fear overrides love, reconstruction becomes necessary.

And where divinity is invoked to justify domination, theology itself must answer.

For the crisis before the church is not merely political. It is spiritual, ethical, and theological:

It concerns whether the language of faith will serve truth or illusion.

Whether religion will deepen human dignity or sanctify exclusion.

Whether Christianity will remain captive to power, or recover the difficult freedom of prophetic witness.

For the church does not lose itself all at once. It is diminished gradually:

Each time fear is called faith.

Each time cruelty is called order.

Each time nationalism is called discipleship.

Each time power is mistaken for providence.

Yet what is deformed may be reformed.

What has been accommodated may be disentangled.

What has been captured by ideology may be reclaimed by truth.

And what has been hardened by fear may yet be opened again by love.

That work of reorientation is not secondary to faith - it is part of faithfulness itself.

For the calling of Christianity is not to preserve dominion, but to bear witness.

Not to sanctify power, but to humanize it.

Not to defend empire, but to embody compassion.

Not to conquer through certainty, but to participate in truth.

If divinity is to mean anything, it must mean love, or it must mean nothing.



Expanded Bibliography


I. Process Theology and Philosophical Foundations

Alfred North Whitehead
Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected ed. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.

Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967.

John B. Cobb Jr.
Cobb, John B., Jr. A Christian Natural Theology: Based on the Thought of Alfred North Whitehead. 2nd ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.

Cobb, John B., Jr., and David Ray Griffin. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1976.

Catherine Keller
Keller, Catherine. Political Theology of the Earth: Our Planetary Emergency and the Struggle for a New Public. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki
Suchocki, Marjorie Hewitt. The Fall to Violence: Original Sin in Relational Theology. New York: Continuum, 1994.


II. Political Theology, Power, and Nationalism

William T. Cavanaugh
Cavanaugh, William T. Migrations of the Holy: God, State, and the Political Meaning of the Church. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.

Cavanaugh, William T. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Stanley Hauerwas
Hauerwas, Stanley. The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.

Hauerwas, Stanley, and William H. Willimon. Resident Aliens: Life in the Christian Colony. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1989.

Reinhold Niebuhr
Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

Niebuhr, Reinhold. The Irony of American History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.


III. Prophetic Critique, Scripture, and Public Faith

Walter Brueggemann
Brueggemann, Walter. The Prophetic Imagination. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2001.

Brueggemann, Walter. Reality, Grief, Hope: Three Urgent Prophetic Tasks. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2014.

N. T. Wright
Wright, N. T. Jesus and the Victory of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1996.

Wright, N. T. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013.

Richard B. Hays
Hays, Richard B. The Moral Vision of the New Testament: Community, Cross, New Creation. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1996.


IV. Justice, Marginality, and Ethical Theology

Howard Thurman
Thurman, Howard. Jesus and the Disinherited. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.

James H. Cone
Cone, James H. God of the Oppressed. Rev. ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1997.

Cone, James H. The Cross and the Lynching Tree. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2011.

Gustavo Gutiérrez
Gutiérrez, Gustavo. A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation. Rev. ed. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1988.

Kelly Brown Douglas
Douglas, Kelly Brown. Stand Your Ground: Black Bodies and the Justice of God. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2015.


V. Christian Ethics, Peace, and Nonviolence

John Howard Yoder
Yoder, John Howard. The Politics of Jesus. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.

Glen H. Stassen
Stassen, Glen H., and David P. Gushee. Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context. 2nd ed. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016.

Dorothy Day
Day, Dorothy. The Long Loneliness: The Autobiography of Dorothy Day. New York: Harper & Row, 1952.


VI. Hermeneutics, Scripture, and Theological Method

Hans-Georg Gadamer
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Continuum, 2004.

Paul Ricoeur
Ricoeur, Paul. Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.

Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.


VII. Contemporary Critiques of Christian Nationalism

Kristin Kobes Du Mez
Du Mez, Kristin Kobes. Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation. New York: Liveright, 2020.

Jemar Tisby
Tisby, Jemar. The Color of Compromise: The Truth about the American Church’s Complicity in Racism. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2019.

Samuel L. Perry
Perry, Samuel L., and Andrew L. Whitehead. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Five Reasons a "Just War Theology" Isn't Faithful to the Gospel




Five Reasons a "Just War Theology"
Isn't Faithful to the Gospel

by R.E. Slater


"Isn't it curious the Lord of Love
died at the hands of violence?"

"Even more curious, those hands
were the hands of those who preached God."

"Who then are we to be wary of?
The Message or the Messenger or both?"

- R.E. Slater

Preface

Let us first ask, as Christians, how did Jesus respond directly to violence when challenged?
“Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.”
- Jesus Christ (Matthew 26:52)
Now let's widen the theological horizon a bit.... Rather than think that acts of peace are naïve idealism, let us instead imagine the telos - the deep direction - of divine history:
“They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”
- The prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 2:4)
Let us next consider how Isaiah's vision was to become embodied within the life of the early Christian Church after Jesus' death and resurrection:
“Do not repay anyone evil for evil… If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink… Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.”
- Paul the Apostle (Romans 12:17–21)
And finally, let us ask what kind of God is revealed in such a movement towards peace:
“God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.”
- John the Apostle (1 John 4:16)
Introduction

Just wars are never just.

Lately, the U.S. government has thought to educate the Catholic Church as to its theology. Ironically, this has often been the case throughout history as governments have challenged the church to behave itself and support its unloving actions.

So, in rare commentary on current political events, let me speak out to Vice President Vance's "Just War" theology vs the Pope's, "Love your fellow man" theology.

It began with Trump's recent refusal to listen to Pope Leo's comments to pursue peace. Next, super Trumpian surrogate J.D. Vance - who was attending a "Turning Point" maga-rally where he was being interviewed - cautioned the Catholic Church to temper their speech to the United States' attack upon Iran.

Additionally, we should remember America's current pro-nationalist maga-administration has supported Israel's aggressive militaristic actions over the past several years:

i) against Hamas in Gaza, where 2 million Palestinians were displaced (2023-2024)
ii) against Hezbollah in Lebanon displacing another million souls (March-April 2026); and,
iii) attacked Iran from March 2026 to the present, displacing 3.2 million Iranians.

These actions by hard-right doctrinaires serve as clear warning that the Maga-American Church's theology of justifying violence with God-speech are theologically in error on several major issues.

But before reviewing these reasons, let us also acknowledge that the terrorist groups here mentioned are not without blame for their inhuman actions and zealous leadership against their own people and the world at large.

And so, I would like to list below why all religions - including dogmatic religious theology - should take heed to practice love, forgiveness, and mercy; and to learn, teach, and practice withdrawal from harm, hate, oppression, and violence.

Five Reasons Not to Preach a Just War Theology

“Where violence is justified, love is deferred;
yet the kingdom of God comes when love is chosen before necessity.”

A careful critique can be made without caricaturing the tradition. The just war theory—classically articulated by figures like Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas—was an attempt to restrain violence, not celebrate it. Yet from a biblical and theological standpoint, several tensions remain difficult to reconcile.

First, there is a Christological tension. The ethical center of Christianity is not abstract principle but the life and teaching of Jesus Christ. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), Jesus does not merely regulate violence; he appears to radically displace it: “love your enemies,” “turn the other cheek,” “blessed are the peacemakers.” Just war theory, even in its most restrained form, reintroduces a framework in which enemy destruction can be morally justified. The critique here is not that war is messy, but that it reverses the direction of Jesus’ ethic - from enemy-love to enemy-legitimation.

Second, there is a kingdom-of-God versus kingdom-of-the-world problem. In texts like John 18:36, Jesus says, “My kingdom is not of this world,” explicitly rejecting violent defense of his mission. Just war theory arose when Christianity moved from persecuted minority to imperial partner, particularly after Edict of Milan and under rulers like Constantine the Great. The critique is that just war theory may reflect the church accommodating itself to state power, rather than remaining a distinctive, countercultural witness. In this sense, the Christian Church risks becoming politically necessary but theologically compromised.

Third, there is an Old Testament versus New Testament hermeneutic tension. Just war reasoning often leans on Israel’s wars in the Hebrew Bible. Yet many Christian interpreters argue that these belong to a particular covenantal-historical moment steeped in cultural context, and cannot be considered a universal ethical norm. The life of Jesus reframes divine action away from territorial conquest toward self-giving reconciliation. If Christ is the fullest revelation of God’s character, then appealing to earlier violent paradigms may appear regressive rather than fulfilled.

Fourth, there is a practical moral erosion problem. Even if just war criteria (sic, "just cause, right intention, proportionality, last resort") are sound in theory, in practice they are almost always bent by political interests. Nations routinely declare their wars “just.” The result is that just war theory can function less as a restraint and more as a moral cover for violence. From a biblical-prophetic standpoint, this aligns uncomfortably with the critique of rulers who “call evil good” (Isaiah 5:20).

Finally, there is a theological anthropology issue. Christianity at its core emphasizes reconciliation, forgiveness, and the restoration of relationship (2 Corinthians 5:18–19). War, even when justified, fundamentally operates through destruction rather than restoration. A process-oriented or relational theology would argue that this contradicts the deeper trajectory of divine action, which moves toward healing the fabric of relations, not legitimating their rupture.

Taken together, these critiques are not merely that just war theory fails in application, but that it may be misaligned with the trajectory of the gospel itself. It attempts to make violence moral, whereas the New Testament vision seems to move toward making violence obsolete.

Conclusion

As counterpoint, defenders would argue that "violence" is a tragic necessity in a fallen world. However, this self-acknowledged critique must press a far sharper question:
Whether Christianity is called to manage the world as it is,
or to bear witness to what it is becoming -
even as Jesus, the apostles and prophets had done in sacred voice.

Bibliography

Primary Sources (Biblical Texts)

The Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV).
The Holy Bible. New International Version (NIV).


Classical Just War Tradition

Augustine of Hippo. City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Classics, 2003.

Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Bros., 1947. (See II–II, Q. 40: “Of War”)

Hugo Grotius. On the Law of War and Peace. Edited by Stephen C. Neff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.


Modern Just War Theory (Defenses and Developments)

Michael Walzer. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 5th ed. New York: Basic Books, 2015.

Paul Ramsey. The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. Lanham: University Press of America, 1983.

Jean Bethke Elshtain. Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York: Basic Books, 2003.


Biblical and Theological Critiques of Violence

John Howard Yoder. The Politics of Jesus. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1994.

Stanley Hauerwas. The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.

Richard B. Hays. The Moral Vision of the New Testament. San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1996.

Walter Wink. Jesus and Nonviolence: A Third Way. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.

Glen H. Stassen and David P. Gushee. Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2003.


Historical and Contextual Studies

Roland H. Bainton. Christian Attitudes Toward War and Peace: A Historical Survey and Critical Re-evaluation. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1960.

Peter Leithart. Defending Constantine: The Twilight of an Empire and the Dawn of Christendom. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2010.


Process and Relational Theological Perspectives

Alfred North Whitehead. Process and Reality. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.

John B. Cobb Jr.. Christ in a Pluralistic Age. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1975.

Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki. The Fall to Violence: Original Sin in Relational Theology. New York: Continuum, 1994.


Supplementary Ethical and Philosophical Reflections

Reinhold Niebuhr. Moral Man and Immoral Society. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.

Jacques Ellul. Violence: Reflections from a Christian Perspective. Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 1991.


Monday, October 13, 2025

Choosing Post-Evangelical Theology: Moving Towards a Relational, Open, and Healing Theology of Faith and Love



A Theology of Love

Choosing Post-Evangelical Theology:
Moving Towards a Relational, Open, and
Healing Theology of Faith and Love

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5


✍️ Preface: A Love That Rewrites the Story

For many of us raised within evangelicalism, theology was taught as something fixed, something we inherited rather than questioned — a set of guarded truths rather than a living conversation with a hurting world. Evangelical theology, as it took root in the 20th century, often placed its energy in drawing lines rather than building bridges: lines against contemporary science, lines against evolution, lines against non-heteronormative identities, lines against other faith traditions, and even lines within Christianity itself.

I, too, inherited those lines.

But over time, the gaps became unsustainable, even unbearable. Those lines were not just drawn on paper; they were drawn through lives to cross-out lives. They created exclusions that harmed and wounded; doctrines that threatened of hell more than they promised healing hope; they created rigid systems that excluded unwanteds; and silenced love when love did not fit their terms and beliefs.

Then one day I discovered a new theology, a new and gracious vocabulary — one based upon a living and relational philosophy: process thought. It offered a cosmology where God is not distant but present in every becoming; not coercive but persuasive; not static but alive. It gave language to what I had felt all along: that love is not merely a command but the very structure of divine reality.

This newer theology does not attempt to “save” evangelicalism. It seeks to transcend and transform theologies of unlove and exclusion — to offer something truer, wider, more humane. A theology centered not on control but on mutual becoming; not on fear but on love.

This “Healing Theology of Love” is both a response to harm Christians have created over the centuries as well as a vision for the future. It is rooted in process philosophy, (open and relational) process theology, and the conviction that love must be the first and last word, the alpha and omega, in every theological reflection - if not the very hermeneutical driver/life of the bible itself.

It is also a theology that refuses to leave behind those the old systems have deemed disposable: transgender and gay people; women who have been sidelined; minorities and racialized communities; those abused within rigid dogmatic systems (such as the Nones and Dones); and the ailing, compromised earth itself (theo-ecology).

This is, in short, a theology which dares to love without apology across all boundaries the church has constructed, maintained, and defined as the gospel of Jesus Christ.


🌿 Introduction: Healing Theology

What we wish to do as Christians of the 21st Century is not simply write a new theology but a healing theology. By taking a faith that has too often been used as a weapon — shaped by fear, control, and exclusion — and re-grounding it in love as hermeneutic and relationship as an ontology. That is no small task.

The work of this website reflects a larger movement many thoughtful people are experiencing and putting into effect today — a quiet, inclusive, challenging revolution of faith. It requires:

  • Leaving static, brittle, evangelical frameworks that deny complexity and difference;

  • Discovering process thought with its dynamic vision of a relational God, open co-creation, evolving (cosmic) meaning, and a cosmos alive with possibility and co-generation; and,

  • Reimagining a faith that liberates rather than imprisons; that welcomes science rather than fears it; that embraces human diversity as part of the divine flow rather than a deviation from it.

This kind of theological turning is not about rejecting faithbut deepening faith. It’s a movement from:

  • Judgment ➝ Hospitality

  • Certainty ➝ Openness

  • Hierarchy ➝ Mutuality

  • Fear of difference ➝ Reverence for multiplicity

A hermeneutic of love does something evangelical literalism could never do well: it listens  by teaching itself to unlearn and relearn before it judges. It understands Scripture as a living conversation, not a frozen codebook. It makes room for transgender people, for evolution, for science, for societal and religious pluralism — and for grace to be larger than human boundaries.

In Whiteheadian terms, this is picturing theology as “an adventure of ideas” — it is co-creative, participative, emergent, ever widening, and centered in transformative value. In Christian terms, it is a theology which takes the Incarnation of Christ very seriously: that divine love is-and-can-be embodied, relational, and present in the legitimacy of our becoming.

This post-evangelical project stands in a long and courageous lineage of reformers to the Christian faith. In the contemporary era, Process thinkers are walking in the paths shared with many of the great transformative theologians of the last century — Tillich, Cobb, Keller, Suchocki, Cone, Moltmann, and others — but we are doing so in a post-evangelical and processual context, one of the most critical theological terrains of the 21st century.

This is the hard and holy work of turning faith from fortress ideology to Eucharistic (table) communion/fellowship. It is the transformative choice (among other elections) to center transgender dignity, human diversity, and the ethics of love into the heart of this post-theological re-visioning making it not only potent, but profoundly future-facing.

“Love is the greatest hermeneutic because love doesn’t ask, ‘Is this correct?’
Love asks, ‘Who is being welcomed, embraced, healed, or harmed?’

This Theology of Love seeks to be structured, layered, historically informed, and open to the pluriverse of human and cosmic experience. It is an architecture built not on fear, but on the most enduring foundation of all: Love.


Transition: From Healing to Building

Every movement of reimagining requires not only courage but structure. Healing theology is not simply about unlearning the harmful; it is also about building the bountiful, the beautiful. Love is more than a sentiment — it is a framework capable of holding doctrine, ethics, science, embodiment, and hope together.

To move from fortress to table, from boundary to belonging, theology must be architected anew:

  • with love as its hermeneutic (its way of envisioning),

  • with relationship as its ontology (its understanding of being),

  • with justice and dignity as its ethic (its way of valuing),

  • and with a shared, open future as its God-wide, cosmic energy (its way of purpose).

This is not a project of dismantling faith, but of re-centering it in the living heart of Love itself as Jesus had shown the church — it is a theology of love that listens, lures, captivates, motivates, recreates, and transformatively calls forward.

Here, theology ceases to be a system of control and becomes instead a movement of life.

The following five-layer framework offers a way to give this vision shape: not as a rigid system, but as a living architecture — flexible, dynamic, relational, and rooted in divine Love. Each layer builds upon the last, forming a theology capable of embracing plurality without losing its center.


🏛 I. Love as Hermeneutic — The First Principle

“Love must be the lens through which every text, tradition, and theology is interpreted. If a doctrine harms, excludes, or diminishes dignity, it is not of God.”

Evangelical theology often begins with Scripture as the ultimate authority, interpreted through inherited doctrinal grids. But this has too often made Scripture a blunt weapon rather than a living word.

Here, we invert the order. We begin with love as the primary hermeneutic — the interpretive key through which all other theological claims must pass.

Core Claim:

  • Love is the relational force through which God participates in the world.

  • Love is theologically prior to every text, creed, or system imposed by the church.

  • The measure of truth is not how tightly it conforms to tradition, but how deeply it expands dignity and relational flourishing.

Implications:

  • Any biblical interpretation that diminishes human worth is theologically deficient.

  • Theologies built on fear, exclusion, or domination are not neutral — they are deformative.

  • Scripture is read through the grammar of love, not love through the grammar of Scripture.

📌 “Love first” does not negate Scripture. It transfigures how Scripture is read.

This hermeneutic gives you a north star:
Every doctrine must answer this question —

“Does this idea, practice, attitude, or action widen love’s embrace or narrow it?”


🌿 II. Philosophical Ground — A Cosmos of Becoming

Process philosophy provides the ontological scaffolding for this theology. The universe is not a static machine ruled by a distant deity but a living, relational, evolving reality.

Core Concepts:

  1. God as Relational

    • God is not omnipotent in the classical sense but omni-relational: God is present in all experiences, luring each moment toward beauty, harmony, and creative advance.

  2. Reality as Process

    • All things are in a constant state of becoming, not just existing.

    • Each moment emerges from prior moments in a complex network of participatory interdependence.

  3. Love as the Structure of Reality

    • Love is not an attribute added to God; it is the very mode of divine activity.

    • God relates to the world not through control but through persuasive love.

  4. Creativity as Divine Gift

    • Every actual entity participates in the unfolding of creation — a shared, co-generative process.

Why this matters:

Traditional theology often frames God as outside the world, intervening at will. Process theology reframes God as within the world, always in relationship with it. Love is not divine sentiment — it is the energetic patterning of existence itself.

“Love is the grammar of becoming. Everything else is commentary.”


📖 III. Theological Core — God, Scripture, Humanity

Here is where a loving theology can take shape - not as a top-down system of control - but as a web of healing, helping intrapersonal and extrapersonal relationships.

1. God

  • Dipolar in nature: both eternal (the ground of reality's being) and temporal (the cosmic companion of becoming).

  • Not the cosmic puppeteer but the intimate co-creator of life itself.

  • God suffers with creation (immanence); God does not simply rule over creation (transcendence).

  • Divine power is persuasive, not unilaterally coercive.

2. Scripture

  • Is a record of evolving human encounters with God; it is not a closed, infallible codebook for life.

  • Reflects both divine lure, the human experience, and human limitations.

  • To read the bible faithfully is to read it through the hermeneutic of love, sifting out what reflects divine compassion from what reflects human fear, religious imposition, folkloric superstitions, and ancient mythologies. It is a narrative of humanity's spiritual  and religious journey of becoming one in purpose and love with the God of the universe.

3. Humanity

  • Is inherently/intrinsically valuable — every human being participates with God in divine becoming and creativity without exclusion.

  • The "Image of God" is not a fixed form but one of relational capacity.

  • Gays, trans, neurodiverse, disabled, racialized, and marginalized lives are not exceptions to the divine image but reflections of its richness and diversity.

4. Sin

  • Reframed as relational rupture — is any act or system that fractures love and mutual flourishing.

  • Not a legal infraction, but a wound in the relational fabric.

5. Salvation

  • Not rescue from a fallen world, but healing of relational ruptures and participation in the ongoing creation of a more just, loving reality.

  • Found not in exclusion but in communion's diverse fellowship.

📌 This theological core is where the post-evangelical shift becomes structural: It eschews a punitive deity, exclusionary doctrines, and dualistic systems of fear.


🌍 IV. Ethical Outworking — Love as Praxis

Theology that does not touch the ground of our being is not theology; it is an aberrant abstraction and unloving practice. A theology of love must be incarnated in practice.

1. Love as Social Architecture

  • Justice is not separate from love; it is love made public.

  • Inclusion is not charity; it is the test of fidelity to divine love.

2. Communities of Belonging

  • Faith communities must be radically hospitable — especially to those most often harmed: LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, disabled people, racialized communities, the poor, and the earth itself.

  • Love is measured by who is welcomed, not by who is excluded.

3. Nonviolence as Ethical Posture

  • Divine love persuades, it never coerces. Our ethical posture mirrors that persuasion.

  • Political, social, and religious systems that depend on fear and control are counter-testimonies.

4. Ecological Love

  • Creation is not a backdrop to salvation history — it is part of it.

  • Environmental justice is a theological act, not an optional extra.

📌 In short: Love is praxis. If it does not act, it is not love.


🕊 V. Eschatological Vision — Hope as an Expanding Horizon

Evangelical eschatology often narrows hope to “who goes to heaven.” A theology of love widens it to the entirety of the cosmos.

1. The Future Is Open

  • God does not control the future but calls creation toward it.

  • Eschatology is relational, participatory, and creative.

2. Love as the Arc of History

  • Love is not a fragile feeling but a cosmic trajectory: from fragmentation to integration, from domination to mutuality.

3. Salvation History as Transformation

  • Hope is found not in escape but in the transfiguration of creation through ongoing acts of love.

4. Co-creating the Future

  • Humans are not passive recipients of divine will but partners in shaping the world.

  • This includes political, ecological, social, and spiritual dimensions.

📌 Love gives us an eschatology big enough for everyone.


✨ Conclusion: Theology "in the Key of Love"

What began for me as an act of deconstruction became something far more: a personal reconstruction of Christianity radically rooted in love. Process philosophy gave me the language of becoming; the gospel gave me the vision of incarnational love. Together, they form a theology capable of holding science, difference, embodiment, and hope.

This is not a theology for a church fortress.
It’s a theology for a shared table.

“Love is the truest hermeneutic,
the strongest ethic,
the most enduring hope.”

In this theology:

  • God is love — relational, evolving, ever-present.

  • Scripture is a living witness to love’s unfolding.

  • Humanity is co-creative, diverse, and sacred.

  • Justice is love’s non-oppressive, public face.

  • The future is open and can be made more beautiful by our participation in love’s work. When we withdraw from this attitude we allow harm and suffering to go forward as we are witnessing today under "maga" influences.

This is the story we can choose to live into. Not as a reaction to fear, but as a reorientation toward life.


🪶Below is a prayer, a manifesto, or an invocation that may be used at the beginning of any invocation, in public gatherings, worship settings, or essays. This text can be used as a responsive reading for congregations, a poetic preface for a manuscript, or a closing litany in public presentations or services. The language is intentionally layered — accessible, resonant, and theologically rich.


🕊️ Invocation: A Theology of Love

Leader: In the beginning, before all words, there was Love.
All: And Love is still the first word.

I believe in Love —
not as ornament, but as origin.
Love is the lens, the language, the living breath.
What does not widen Love’s embrace
cannot bear the name of God.

I believe in a world alive with becoming,
where each heartbeat, each star, each whisper of wind
is woven in a living tapestry of relationship.
Love is not an afterthought —
it is the deep structure of reality.

I believe in a God who does not coerce but companions,
whose power is persuasion,
whose nature is relationship,
whose name is Love.
Scripture is not a cage but a conversation —
a record of humanity’s trembling encounters
with a Love too vast to be contained.

I believe every human being
is made of sacred becoming —
trans, cis, gay, straight, disabled, neurodiverse,
Black, Brown, White, Indigenous —
each a reflection of Love’s unending creativity.
Sin is not a stain but a rupture,
and salvation is the healing of the wound.

I believe Love builds tables, not walls.
It has hands that welcome,
feet that march for justice,
arms that lift the fallen,
and eyes that see what fear refuses to look at.
Justice is Love speaking in public.
Hospitality is Love made flesh.

I believe the future is not closed but open,
an ever-widening horizon of holy possibility.
Love lures us forward, never forcing, always inviting.
Hope is not wishful thinking —
it is Love dreaming the world toward beauty.

And so we confess with heart and breath:

  Love before all things,
  Love within all things,
  Love beyond all things.
  
  Love listens.
  Love interprets.
  Love heals.
  Love creates.

Leader: In the end, as in the beginning, there is Love.
All: And Love shall have the final word.

R.E. Slater
October 14, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved