Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Showing posts with label Bible - Archaeology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible - Archaeology. Show all posts

Friday, September 18, 2026

Index - Prehistory of the Bible



Index - Prehistory of the Bible

An Introductory Study into the Deep Human World Behind the Bible

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT

The question being asked in this study, “How then shall we live?” is an inadvertent echo of Francis Schaeffer's "How Should We Then Live?" - the title of his 1976 book and associated film series, "How Should We Then Live? The Rise and Decline of Western Thought and Culture." The question emerged from the intellectual world surrounding Schaeffer's residential study center, L'Abri in Switzerland, and from his attempt to trace Western civilization through philosophy, art, religion, and culture toward what he regarded as the crisis of modern secular thought.

More than half a century later, we have approached a similar question, but through a considerably longer human history - one extending beyond Western civilization, Christianity, Israel, and the biblical page into the evolutionary and prehistoric worlds from which human culture itself emerged. Our question therefore becomes not only how Christians might live within a modern pluralistic world, but how human beings, having inherited this immense evolutionary, cultural, religious, and narrative history, might live more responsibly and compassionately with one another, with the stranger, and with the living world of nature with which we share.

 


Introduction to the Series

Long before there was a Bible, there were human beings asking questions. They wondered about birth and death, the heavens and Earth, animals and ancestors, suffering and catastrophe, good and evil, belonging and the stranger, and whatever powers or mysteries might lie beyond the visible world. For tens of thousands of years these questions found expression through burial, ritual, art, symbol, story, myth, religion, and eventually written literature.

The Biblical Prehistory essays will explore this largely forgotten world behind the Bible. Beginning with human evolution and the symbolic cultures of the Paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic periods, the study moves forward through the rise of agriculture, cities, civilizations, and the great narrative traditions of Mesopotamia, Egypt, Canaan, and the ancient Near East. Only then do we arrive at ancient Israel and discover that the Bible did not simply appear in an empty world with its own early events and beliefs. Rather, its stories participated in an already ancient human conversation about creation, climate events, mortality, catastrophe, justice, suffering, God, community, and the meaning of human existence.

This study is not intended to disprove God, diminish the Bible, or test anyone's faith. Neither will it begin with questions of biblical revelation, inspiration, or inerrancy. Those questions belong more properly to the realms of theology and religion. Its purpose here is more fundamental: to give the Bible back its historical background. When Scriptural understanding is integrated with the prehistory of civilization before it - the evolutionary, cultural, religious, and later literary worlds from which it arose - then familiar biblical texts may become unfamiliar again, and perhaps richer for the discussion.

The God of the universe, of the heavens and the earth, may be a question for some, but for many this God is ever a wonder and a mystery. As the earth and ancient life evolved, early humanity gradually became capable of asking ancient questions of God and life. Those questions, insights, beliefs, and stories of the ancient past became part of humanity's perpetuating legends that were remembered not only then but even now, in our modern, postmodern, and emerging metamodern societies as we search for meaning and meaningful living with one another.

That ancient search eventually returns the question to us. What have human beings learned across the immense journey from our earliest ancestors to the present? How might our inherited stories help us become more compassionate participants in the world we now inhabit? The journey into biblical prehistory therefore leads finally toward the present: toward care for one another, hospitality toward the stranger, compassion for suffering, responsibility toward Earth and its wild things, and the continuing question that has accompanied humanity from time immemorial: How then shall we live?

 


The Immediate World Behind the Bible
The Ancient Narrative World Israel Inherited and Reinterpreted


Ancient
source/tradition
Approx. surviving
textual tradition

Biblical resonance
Enuma Elish2nd millennium BCEGenesis 1; creation, primordial waters, cosmic ordering
Atrahasis Epicc. 18th–17th c. BCEGenesis 1–9; creation of humans, overpopulation, divine judgment, flood
Epic of Gilgamesh, Tablet XIroots in 2nd millennium BCEGenesis 6–9; flood, boat, preservation of life, birds, sacrifice
Sumerian Flood / Ziusudraearly 2nd millennium BCE textNoah tradition
Eridu Genesis traditionsSumeriancreation → kingship → flood
Adapa2nd millennium BCEmortality, divine knowledge, lost possibility of immortality
Enki and Ninhursag / DilmunSumerianparadisal land, water, fertility, human/divine existence
Enki and NinmahSumeriancreation of humanity from clay
Egyptian creation traditions3rd–1st millennia BCEprimordial waters, creation by divine speech/order
Ugaritic Baal Cyclec. 14th–13th c. BCEPsalms, Job, prophetic imagery; storm deity, sea/chaos combat
Aqhat / Keret traditionsUgaritickingship, blessing, fertility, covenantal/social themes
Mesopotamian law collections3rd–2nd millennia BCEExodus–Deuteronomy; covenant/law/social order
Egyptian wisdom literature3rd–1st millennia BCEProverbs, Ecclesiastes and wisdom traditions
Babylonian Theodicy / Ludlul2nd millennium BCEJob; innocent suffering and divine justice

1 - The flood relationship is particularly strong. Comparative scholarship treats Atrahasis, the Sumerian flood account, Gilgamesh, and later Berossus as genuine comparative material for Genesis 6–8, while also emphasizing that similarities must be weighed rather than merely counted.

2 - Ancient human questions were already asking about creation, flood, chaos, garden, mortality, divine-human relations, sacrifice, kingship, law, wisdom, suffering.


A Provisional Outline for the
Prehistory of the Bible Study Series


Long before there was Scripture,
there were human beings asking questions.

The Bible did not begin humanity's great conversation.
It entered into it.

When did reality first become story in the human mind -
and why did those stories develop?

Ultimately, humanity comes to ask,
"How then shall we live?"

- R.E. Slater and ChatGPT



Introduction - The Prehistory of the Bible

The Prehistory of the Bible (1)
An Introductory Study into the Deep Human World Behind the Bible
Long before there was a Bible, human beings were already confronting birth and death, animals and ancestors, catastrophe and survival, belonging and the stranger, the heavens and Earth, suffering and meaning, and whatever powers or mysteries might lie beyond the immediately visible world. This introductory essay establishes the purpose of the study: not to disprove God, diminish Scripture, or test anyone's faith, but to recover the immense evolutionary, archaeological, cultural, religious, historical, and literary worlds behind the Bible.

The Bible Has an Address (2)
Returning Scripture to History
The Bible arose somewhere, sometime, among particular peoples speaking particular languages and inhabiting particular cultural, political, cosmological, and religious worlds. To understand Scripture historically is therefore to give the Bible back its originating address.

Excavating the Human Story (3)
Evidence, Archaeology, Text, Interpretation, and the Limits of Knowing
Introducing the method of the series. We begin in the present and excavate backward through Christianity, Judaism, ancient Israel, neighboring civilizations, prehistoric cultures, and human evolution. Along the way we distinguish: evidence → inference → interpretation → speculation. Texts can sometimes tell us what ancient people said. Archaeology can tell us what people made and did. Neither automatically tells us everything they believed.


The Architecture of Biblical Prehistory
Phase 1 - The Excavation

Where did the Bible come from? Our first journey moves backward. We begin with the biblical world familiar to contemporary Christians and progressively remove later historical layers. Each excavation raises the same question: What lies beneath this portion of history?

Movement I - The Bible We Inherited
Beginning Where We Are to the Deep Human Past

The Bible Christians Think They Know (4)
Scripture, Memory, and Inherited Belief
Creation, Adam and Eve, the Fall, Flood, Babel, Abraham, Israel, Satan, Messiah, heaven, hell, resurrection, Jesus, and Christ as they commonly inhabit Christian imagination. Before asking whether these understandings are correct or incorrect, we must first ask how they came to be understood as they currently were then and now.

Biblical Belief and Christian Belief (5)
Are The Two Always the Same Thing?
Ancient biblical ideas and later Christian beliefs are related but not necessarily identical. Centuries of theology, philosophy, doctrine, translation, preaching, art, culture, and tradition can become unconsciously read backward into much older texts.

Where Did These Ideas Come From? (6)
Beginning the Excavation
How old are the beliefs Christians commonly associate with the Bible? Which forms of those beliefs come from the Hebrew Bible? Which forms developed within later Judaism? Which arose within Christianity? And which acquired their familiar forms much later still?

Movement II - Beneath Christianity
Jesus and the Jewish Worlds Behind Christian Belief

Jesus Was a Jew (7)
Recovering the Historical World of Jesus
Jesus as located within Second Temple Judaism rather than in later Christianity: Torah, Temple, Roman occupation, Jewish sectarian diversity, prophetic tradition, wisdom, apocalyptic expectation, purity, poverty, power, and hope.

The Jewish World Before Christianity (8)
Temple, Torah, Wisdom, and Apocalyptic Hope
The diverse Jewish religious worlds preceding and surrounding the Jesus movement. Judaism itself possessed a history.

Messiah, Resurrection, Angels, Demons, and Satan (9)
Ancient Ideas With Their Own Histories
Concepts often assumed to be uniformly biblical developed substantially across Jewish history, especially during the Second Temple period. Religious ideas themselves become part of our archaeological excavation.

From Jesus to Messiah (Christ) (10)
History, Memory, Confession, and Interpretation
Jesus belongs to history. Jesus as Messiah Christ belongs to interpretation. How communities remembering Jesus interpreted his life, teaching, crucifixion, resurrection experiences, and continuing significance through Jewish categories such as Messiah, Lord, Son of Man, Son of God, and eventually other philosophical and theological categories.

Movement III - Beneath Judaism
Ancient Israel and the Becoming of Biblical Religion

Before Judaism (11)
Israel and Judah in the Ancient Near East
Moving backward from Second Temple Judaism into the older worlds of Israel and Judah. Who were the Israelites, and where did they belong within the ancient Near East?

Yahweh, El, and the Divine World of Ancient Israel (12)
Recovering an Older Religious Landscape
Israelite religion within its wider Canaanite setting. The religious cults of Yahweh, El, Asherah, divine councils, local cults, family religion, temples, shrines, and the evidence for a religious world more complex than later monotheistic summaries sometimes suggest.

From Many Gods Towards One God (13)
The Long Development of Israelite Monotheism
Polytheistic environments, monolatry, exclusive Yahwism, exile, theological reinterpretation, and the development of increasingly explicit monotheism.

Temple, Sacrifice, Kingship, and Prophecy (14)
Religion Before the Bible Became a Book
Israelite religion as lived practice before it became primarily encountered by later readers as written Scripture.

Exile and the Remaking of Israel (15)
Catastrophe, Memory, Identity, and God
How conquest, destruction, displacement, exile, and restoration reshaped Israel's understanding of itself, its past, its covenant, and its God.

How the Hebrew Bible Became (16)
Memory, Oral Tradition, Writing, Editing, and Scripture
The long movement from remembered traditions and oral transmission through written compositions, collections, revisions, and eventual bodies of authoritative literature.

Movement IV - The Great Civilizations Behind the Bible
The Bible itself has a history

Israel Had Neighbors (17)
Entering the Ancient Near Eastern World
Israel did not arise in an empty cultural landscape. Introduction to Canaan, Ugarit, Egypt, Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, and Babylon.

Sumer, Akkad, and Babylon (18)
Stories Older Than the Bible
Cities, writing, scribes, temples, kings, gods, creation, catastrophe, mortality, law, wisdom, and the emergence of written narrative traditions long before biblical literature.

Egypt and the Ordered Cosmos (19)
Creation, Ma'at, Kingship, Death, and Eternity
Primordial waters, divine creativity, cosmic order, sacred kingship, wisdom, death, judgment, and afterlife.

Canaan and Ugarit (20)
The Religious World Closest to Ancient Israel
El, Baal, Asherah, Anat, divine councils, sacred mountains, Sea, Death, storm imagery, fertility, and kingship. Here we encounter some of the cultural and religious worlds most closely related to ancient Israel.

Before Genesis (21)
Ancient Stories of Creation and Human Origins
Enuma Elish, Atrahasis, Egyptian creation traditions, humans from earthly materials, primordial waters, divine speech, cosmic ordering, sacred landscapes, and humanity's place within creation.

Before Noah (22)
Flood, Catastrophe, Climate, and Cultural Memory
Ziusudra, Atrahasis, Gilgamesh, ancient flood traditions, environmental catastrophe, cultural memory, and the later biblical flood narrative. Similarity does not automatically mean copying. The task is to understand inheritance, shared environment, adaptation, transformation, and literary relationship where evidence permits.

Gardens, Wisdom, Serpents, and Immortality (23)
Ancient Humanity Confronts Mortality
Adapa, Gilgamesh, Dilmun, sacred gardens, wisdom, lost immortality, life, death, and humanity's ancient awareness of its mortality.

Law, Justice, Suffering, and Wisdom (24)
Human Questions Before Biblical Answers
Mesopotamian law collections, Egyptian wisdom traditions, Babylonian theodicy, lament, innocent suffering, justice, social order, and their biblical resonances.


Interlude I
Humanity's Questions Before the Bible

Before there was Genesis, humanity was already asking:
  • Where did everything come from?
  • Why are we here?
  • Why do humans die?
  • Why is there suffering?
  • Why does catastrophe occur?
  • What makes something sacred?
  • What do we owe one another?
  • What do we owe the dead?
  • What lies beyond the visible world?
  • How should we live?
But writing only takes us so far. We dig deeper.

Movement V - Beneath Civilization
The Neolithic and Mesolithic Worlds of Early Humanity

When Writing Disappears (25)
How Can We Know What Prehistoric Humans Believed?
We cross an evidentiary boundary. There are no texts to explain what people thought. Archaeology becomes our principal witness: buildings, bodies, burials, objects, images, food, landscapes, deposition, and repeated human behavior.

Göbekli Tepe (26)
Gathering, Monument, Animal, and Symbol Before Civilization
Monumental architecture among hunter-gatherer and early sedentary communities at the beginning of the Neolithic. What can its pillars, animals, enclosures, and gathering practices tell us - and what may remain unknown?

Houses, Ancestors, and the Dead (27)
Çatalhöyük, Jericho, 'Ain Ghazal, and Neolithic Meaning
Burials beneath houses, plastered skulls, anthropomorphic statues, animals, domestic spaces, ancestors, community, and memory.

Agriculture Changed Everything (28)
Land, Settlement, Fertility, Property, and Power
The Neolithic transformation of humanity's relationship with land, animals, food, reproduction, settlement, property, hierarchy, community, and sacred spaces.

Before the Farmers (29)
Mesolithic Worlds of Landscape, Animals, and Memory
Hunter-gatherer worlds during changing post-Ice Age environments. Burial, ornamentation, animals, landscape, mobility, repeated places, ancestors, and community. Cities disappear. Writing disappears. 
Agriculture largely disappears. But meaning does not disappear.

Movement VI - Beneath Religion
Paleolithic Humanity and the First Symbolic Worlds

The Living and the Dead (30)
Middle Paleolithic Humanity and the Human Threshold
Early Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, deliberate burial, ochre, ornaments, possible symbolic markings, care for bodies, and the increasingly hazardous attempt to infer ancient meanings. We do not know whether these people possessed "religion." But something was happening.

When Humans Began Leaving Symbols (31)
The Archaeology of Meaning
Material evidence for representation, identity, memory, symbolic behavior, and increasingly complex cultural worlds.

Into the Caves (32)
Chauvet, Lascaux, Altamira, and the Painted Animal World
Deep-cave imagery, animals, handprints, abstract signs, difficult subterranean spaces, and the extraordinary investment humans made in creating images far from ordinary habitation.

The Lion-Man and the Imagined World (33)
When Reality Became More Than What Was Seen
Human-animal composites, figurines, representation, imagination, and humanity's growing capacity to create things that had never existed in ordinary perception. Human beings were no longer merely inhabiting reality. They were visibly interpreting it.


Interlude II
When Did Reality Become Story?

At some unknowable point, a human ancestor confronted death, birth, blood, animal, fire, lightning, moon, storm, darkness, or another human being and did something astonishing: s/he wondered what it meant. That moment left no text. Yet much of what followed may depend upon capacities such moments reveal.

Movement VII - Beneath Story
Evolution and the Becoming of Humanity

Becoming Human (34)
Evolution Before Religion
The much deeper evolutionary history behind Homo sapiens. Hominin evolution and the emergence of creatures increasingly capable of social learning, culture, memory, communication, imagination, and symbolic life.

Human Beings Became Human Together (35)
Sociality, Cooperation, Competition, and Care
Attachment, kinship, caregiving, food sharing, reciprocity, cooperation, conflict, violence, group belonging, and the evolutionary roots of human social existence. Religion did not invent sociality. Narrative did not invent cooperation. Both eventually worked upon capacities with much deeper evolutionary histories.

From Communication to Symbol (36)
Language, Memory, Imagination, and Shared Meaning
How increasingly sophisticated communication, social learning, memory, imagination, and symbolic cognition made cumulative culture possible.

Before Myth (37)
The First Symbolic Horizon
A cautious conceptual exploration: awareness → agency → death → memory → symbol → ritual → shared narrative → myth → cosmology → religionNot an inevitable evolutionary ladder and not a reconstructed chronology of prehistoric belief. Rather, these are capacities and developments through which evolutionary humans became capable of constructing shared worlds of meaning. We have now reached the deepest layer of our excavation. Now we turn around and move back up the ladder of time.


The Architecture of Biblical Prehistory
Phase 2 - The Long Human Journey

We have been reconstructing chronologically the world that eventually produced the Bible. The first phase asked: What lies beneath the Bible? The second asks: What happened across this immense span of human time? We now reconstruct the history in its natural chronological direction. The purpose is not to repeat the excavation. It is to see development, continuity, discontinuity, and transformation across time.

Movement VIII - From Human Becoming to Human Meaning
The Chronological Reconstruction

The Deep Human Beginning (38)
Evolution, Sociality, Care, and the Emergence of Homo sapiens
Beginning at the evolutionary foundation: embodied social creatures living, cooperating, competing, reproducing, learning, caring, communicating, and surviving together.

The First Symbolic Horizons (39)
Middle Paleolithic Humanity
Roughly 300,000-50,000 years ago. Early Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, bodies, ochre, ornament, burial, identity, social memory, and the first increasingly visible traces of symbolic worlds.

When Reality Became Story (40)
Upper Paleolithic Humanity
Roughly 50,000-12,000 BCE. Cave imagery, animals, composite beings, figurines, ornaments, burial, signs, representation, imagination, and increasingly elaborate symbolic culture.

Between the Ice Age and Early Agricultural Societies (41)
Mesolithic Humanity
Roughly 15,000-8,000 BCE, varying greatly by region. Changing climates, hunter-gatherer adaptation, landscape, mobility, animals, burial, memory, aggregation, and growing social complexity.

Settling the World (42)
The Neolithic Transformation
Beginning roughly 10,000 BCE in Southwest Asia, with different chronologies elsewhere. Agriculture, domestication, settlement, houses, ancestors, monumental gathering, fertility, land, ownership, social differentiation, and new relationships between humanity and environment.

When Villages Became Civilizations (43)
Cities, Temples, Kings, Priests, and Writing
The emergence of urban life, political hierarchy, organized religion, specialized labor, monumental architecture, record keeping, and writing. Human memory could now exist outside individual minds. Stories could survive their storytellers.

When Stories Became Literature (44)
Sumer, Akkad, Babylon, Egypt, and Canaan
Oral and ritual worlds increasingly became written worlds. Creation, kingship, gods, catastrophe, law, wisdom, suffering, mortality, sacred order, and cosmic meaning became preserved in texts.

From the Ancient Near East to Israel (45)
The Cultural World From Which Biblical Literature Emerged
Canaanite, Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Levantine, and Israelite worlds intersect. Israel inherits, participates in, contests, adapts, and transforms traditions within this larger environment.

A Very Long Genealogy of Genesis (46)
From Symbolic Humanity to Biblical Narrative
The synthesis of the chronological journey: Paleolithic symbolic consciousness  animal / death / ancestor / landscape worlds  Mesolithic ritual and social worlds → Neolithic communal cosmologies → agricultural and settled societies → urban temple cosmologies → Sumerian literary traditions → Akkadian and Babylonian traditions → Canaanite / Egyptian / Near Eastern narrative worlds → Israelite interpretation → Torah / Prophets / Wisdom → Jewish and Christian interpretation. This is not a claim that we can trace Genesis directly backward to Paleolithic humanity. We cannot. It is a history of increasingly elaborate human capacities for symbol, ritual, narrative, religion, social organization, and cultural memory. Biblical narrative may therefore be understood as one comparatively recent branch of humanity's enormously ancient practice of narrating reality.


Interlude III
The Turning Point

We began with Christians holding a Bible. We excavated backward until there was no Christianity. Then no Judaism. No Israel. No Bible. No writing. No city. No agriculture. Perhaps no identifiable religion. Only evolving human beings living together within an evolving world. Then we turned around and  watched those human beings become symbolic, narrative, ritual, agricultural, urban, literary, and religious creatures. And eventually: there was a Bible which we might read again through the lens of prehistory.

The Architecture of Biblical Prehistory
Phase 3 - Returning to the Bible

We now turn back to the Bible to reread its pages having recovered its prehistory. Our final journey now asks: What does knowing all of this change within us, the people around us, and the societies around the world?

Movement IX - The Bible in the Evolving Story of Humanity
Inheritance, Transformation, and Biblical Contribution

Genesis Among the Ancients (47)
Creation Reconsidered
After encountering the cosmologies and creation traditions of the ancient world we return to Genesis. What does Genesis share with that world? What does it transform? What questions does it answer differently?

Adam, Eve, and Becoming Human (48)
Ancient Anthropology After Human Evolution
What happens to Adam and Eve when Genesis is no longer required to function as modern biological history? How does ancient anthropology, human identity, mortality, moral consciousness, sexuality, relationship, labor, land, and exile make humanity's legacy meaningful?

Eden, Cain, Noah, and Babel (49)
Mortality, Violence, Catastrophe, and Civilization
Reading the biblical primeval narratives within their ancient literary environments and within the vastly deeper human history now recovered.

Abraham, Exodus, and Israel's Remembered Past (50)
History, Tradition, Identity, and Meaning
Ancestral memory, migration, liberation, covenant, land, identity, and the relationship between remembered narrative and historical reconstruction.

Prophets, Wisdom, and the Human Condition (51)
Justice, Suffering, Meaning, and Hope
Prophetic justice, Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, suffering, moral responsibility, political power, meaning, meaninglessness, and hope.

What Did Israel Do With the Ancient World? (52)
Inheritance, Rejection, Transformation, and Contribution
Moving beyond the simplistic proposition: Gilgamesh → Genesis where Israel seemingly "copied" pagan mythology. The richer questions concern shared cultural inheritance, adaptation, polemic, reinterpretation, innovation, memory, and the distinct contributions biblical writers made to humanity's older conversations.

Movement X - The Bible After the Bible
How Ancient Texts Created New Worlds

From Hebrew Bible to Jewish Scripture (53)
Interpretation Never Stopped
Scripture continued to be interpreted, expanded, translated, debated, and applied within developing Jewish communities.

From Jewish Scripture to Christian Bible (54)
Jesus, Christ, Paul, and a New Interpretive World
How followers of Jesus reread Israel's Scriptures and eventually generated their own writings, cosmic and spiritual interpretations, and collections.

When Interpretation Became Doctrine (55)
Scripture, Philosophy, Creed, and Christian Tradition
How philosophical, theological, institutional, and cultural worlds shaped later Christian understandings of Scripture. The question is no longer merely: What does the Bible say? But also: What have later communities taught us to think the Bible says?

The Modern Bible (56)
Science, History, Evolution, Fundamentalism, and Evangelicalism
Geology, evolutionary biology, archaeology, historical criticism, modernity, fundamentalism, evangelicalism, and the emergence of contemporary disputes about biblical authority and interpretation.

Movement XI - The Stories We Still Live By
Ancient Story and Modern Humanity

The Myth-Making Animal Never Disappeared (57)
Narrative After the Ancient World
Modern humanity did not cease constructing world-organizing narratives. Religious and secular societies alike continue to interpret themselves through stories of identity, origin, destiny, progress, nation, economy, technology, catastrophe, salvation, and hope.

Stories That Bind and Stories That Divide (58)
Cooperation, Belonging, Identity, and Power
Shared narratives can enable extraordinary cooperation. They can also establish boundaries between insider and outsider, neighbor and enemy, belonging and exclusion. The ancient storytelling creature remains morally ambiguous.

What Are Our Stories Doing to Us? (59)
Human Becoming in the Modern World
The ancient human capacity for narrative now operates within technological civilization, ecological crisis, global interdependence, mass communication, artificial intelligence, and unprecedented human power. Our stories still shape what kinds of humans we become whether good or bad.

Movement XII - What Do We Do with the Bible Now?
Faith After Historical Understanding

The Bible After Biblical Prehistory (60)
What Kind of Book Have We Inherited?
Returning to Scripture after restoring its evolutionary, archaeological, cultural, historical, religious, and literary background. The Bible becomes neither a magical book dropped outside history nor merely another ancient artifact. It becomes an extraordinary collection of ancient human religious voices arising from within humanity's long search for meaning.

Myth, History, and Truth (61)
Beyond the Choice Between Literalism and Rejection
What is myth? What is history? What is memory? What is theological narrative? Can ancient literature convey profound truth without functioning as modern science or historiography?

Revelation, Inspiration, and Inerrancy (62)
Questions That Return After History
These theological questions were deliberately bracketed at the beginning. Only after recovering the historical Bible do we return to them. What might revelation and inspiration mean after historical criticism? What becomes of inerrancy? What kind of Scripture remains possible?

God After Deep Time (63)
Does Historical Understanding Make God Disappear?
Evolution does not by itself answer the theological question of God. Neither does archaeology. Neither does comparative mythology. We return to God only after distinguishing historical description from theological interpretation. For some, God remains a question. For others, God remains wonder, mystery, and truth.

Jesus After Historical Understanding (64)
Following Jesus in a Historically Conscious Christianity
Returning to Jesus and Christ after recovering the deep histories of humanity, religion, Israel, Judaism, Scripture, and Christianity. What might following Jesus mean when Christian faith no longer requires a historically contextless Bible?

Movement XIII - How Then Shall We Live?
Human Becoming and the Expanding Possibility of Care

Human Beings Became Human Together (65)
Humanity's Long Moral Inheritance
We return to the eusociality encountered at the deepest levels of our study. Caring for offspring. The fidelity of kinship. Sharing of food and goods. Cooperation. Reciprocity. Community. Living through conflict and violence. Seeking protection and shelter. Enduring grief. And learning to belong with one another. Across this wide spectrum humanity feels the moral possibilities that emerge within the ancient tensions that exists between care and domination, cooperation and competition, hospitality and exclusion.

The Expanding Circle of Moral Belonging (66)
Kin, Stranger, Humanity, Earth
The moral circle can widen from self → family → kin → community → stranger → humanity → other creatures → Earth → future generations. And perhaps, someday, toward genuinely conscious beings humanity itself may create. But enlargement is never inevitable. Humanity repeatedly contracts the circle of care and love even as it struggles to enlarge it.

What Do We Do With Our Humanity? (67)
The Question Beneath the Biblical Question
After asking what we should do with the Bible, a deeper question remains. What shall we do with the extraordinary human capacities for memory, imagination, narrative, religion, cooperation, violence, creativity, compassion, and love that eventually produced it?

How Then Shall We Live? (68)
From Humanity's Ancient Questions to Our Own
Our languages have changed. Our cosmologies have changed. Our technologies have changed. Our civilizations have changed. Yet humanity continues to confront birth and death, suffering and joy, violence and peace, belonging and exclusion, wonder and mystery, stranger and neighbor, Earth and one another. The study therefore ends where humanity's ancient search repeatedly returns: How might we become more compassionate participants in the world we now inhabit? How shall we care for one another, for the stranger, for the suffering, for Earth and its wild things, and for those who will inhabit the world after us? And finally: How then shall we live?


Conclusion
How Then Shall We Live?

We have traveled backward from the Bible we inherited through Christianity, Judaism, ancient Israel, the civilizations of the ancient Near East, the prehistoric worlds of early humanity, and finally into the evolutionary history from which human beings emerged. We then turned around and followed humanity forward again - through sociality and care, communication and symbol, ritual and narrative, settlement and civilization, writing and religion - until we encountered the Bible once more. But having recovered its prehistory, we no longer encounter the Bible without a history. The Bible now has an address.

The Architecture of Biblical Prehistory

Phase 1 - The Excavation


Where did the Bible come from?

The Bible We Inherited → Christianity → Jesus and Second Temple Judaism → Ancient Israel and Judah → Canaan / Ugarit / Egypt / Mesopotamia → Neolithic and Mesolithic Humanity → Paleolithic Symbolic Worlds → Human Evolution


Phase 2 - The Long Human Journey


What happened across deep human time?

Human Evolution → Sociality and Care → Communication → Symbol → Ritual → Narrative → Myth → Settlement and Agriculture → Civilization → Writing → Ancient Cosmology and Religion → Israel → Biblical Literature

This is not a straight line of inevitable progress. It is a history of branching, inheritance, loss, innovation, adaptation, conflict, continuity, and becoming.


Phase 3 - The Return


What does knowing this change?

Biblical Narrative → Jewish Interpretation → Jesus and Christianity → Later Christian Interpretation → The Modern Bible → Historical Understanding → Our Own Narrative Worlds → Human Responsibility


Four Questions Govern the Study

The Historical Question

Where did the Bible come from?

The Human Question

How did evolutionary creatures become creatures capable of symbol, religion, story, and Scripture?

The Interpretive Question

What happens to the Bible when we return it to the immense human history from which it arose?

The Participatory Question

What shall we do with this inheritance now?


The Journey in One Movement

We begin with a Bible in our hands.

We excavate backward until the Bible disappears. We continue until civilization disappears, writing disappears, and agriculture disappears. Recognizable religion becomes increasingly difficult to identify. Eventually we encounter evolving human beings living together within an evolving world.

Then we turn around.

We watch humans care. We watch them communicate. We watch them remember. We watch them symbolize. We watch them bury their dead. We watch them paint. We watch them gather. We watch them settle. We watch them farm. We watch them build. We watch them tell stories. We watch stories become traditions. We watch traditions become civilizations. We watch civilizations write. We watch written stories become sacred stories.

And eventually we encounter the Bible again.

But now the Bible has an address.

And the question with which we began has become larger.

We began by asking:

Where did the Bible come from?

We end by asking:

What do we do with the humanity that created, inherited, preserved, interpreted, contested, loved, feared, and continues to live through its stories?

The Bible belongs within that immense human story. It did not introduce humanity to the great questions of existence. It inherited questions already ancient when its earliest traditions arose, gave them particular voices within the worlds of Israel and Judaism, and passed those voices onward into Christianity and beyond. To recover that history need not make the Bible smaller. It may instead make both the Bible and humanity's story considerably larger.

And perhaps that is where biblical prehistory finally returns us - not merely to questions about what ancient people believed, nor even to questions about what we should believe about their writings, but to the human beings who created, inherited, preserved, interpreted, and continually reinterpreted them. Their questions have become our questions because we belong to the same unfinished human story.

We still confront birth and death, love and loss, suffering and joy, violence and peace, belonging and exclusion, stranger and neighbor, Earth and one another. We still construct stories by which we understand ourselves and our world. And we still must decide what kinds of people those stories will help us become.

And beneath all these questions remains humanity's ancient question:

How then shall we live?


R.E. Slater and ChatGPT
September 2026


Saturday, March 8, 2025

The Evolution of God: From Polytheism to Monotheism


The above diagram is an attempt to illustrate Wright’s account of
the evolution of the Judaeo-Christian God from ancient
Canaanite polytheism. |  click to enlarge

The EVOLUTION OF GOD:
from Polytheism to Monotheism

May 2, 2022

[editorial additions or reformatting are mine - re slater]

The Bible is usually read as a grand narrative from creation to apocalypse. This straight-forward reading presents some paradoxes. For example, the Biblical God commands wrathful genocides alongside loving forgiveness. At times He demands uncompromising nationalism and at other times He promotes generous universalism.

For centuries, armies of apologists have been busy justifying these paradoxes, anxious to clear up doubts that could arise about the divine origins of Bible. Robert Wright’s monumental book The Evolution of God gives a much simpler explanation for God’s schizophrenic nature: the God of the Bible is actually an amalgamation of different Canaanite gods. According to Wright the Bible is a selectively edited compilation of sacred middle eastern texts and traditions forged together into a cohesive narrative
i) by Jewish scholars during the Babylonian captivity (697 BC) and then
ii) added to by Christian fathers in the 3rd century AD. It was only during the Babylonian captivity that true monotheism emerged.
amazon link

Book Blurb (June 2009)
In this sweeping narrative that takes us from the Stone Age to the Information Age, Robert Wright unveils an astonishing discovery: there is a hidden pattern that the great monotheistic faiths have followed as they have evolved. Through the prisms of archaeology, theology, and evolutionary psychology, Wright's findings overturn basic assumptions about Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and are sure to cause controversy. He explains why spirituality has a role today, and why science, contrary to conventional wisdom, affirms the validity of the religious quest. And this previously unrecognized evolutionary logic points not toward continued religious extremism, but future harmony. Nearly a decade in the making, The Evolution of God is a breathtaking re-examination of the past, and a visionary look forward.

In Wright’s narrative, the Jews were actually much less genocidal than the Biblical narrative suggests they were. In the Old Testament, God is a wrathful champion of an ISIS-like nation cruising from victory to victory as long as they were loyal to Him. However Wright suggests that Israel was actually a loose coalition of polytheistic tribes fighting off gigantic empires surrounding them. Within this pressure cooker Israelites faced impossible decisions: whether to accept humiliating vassalage at the hands of oppressive empires or to stand bravely against them. Not everyone can relate to the genocidal Jews in the literal Biblical account. But everyone can relate to Wright’s narrative of a nation afflicted and beset by unresolvable dilemmas. Under these circumstances it’s easy to see how some of the more troubling views about God emerged. Israelis were always the “little guys,” but they were inspired by stories that made them and their God out to be just as great or greater than the ruthless empires they were forced to take on.

The above diagram is an attempt to illustrate Wright’s account of the evolution of the Judaeo-Christian God from ancient Canaanite polytheism. It is meant to be a kind of family tree with the ancestral gods depicted at the bottom and evolving over time to form the Holy Trinity at the top. Wright is quick to point out that this narrative is not universally accepted, especially among the religiously devout. Nevertheless it utilizes some of the more mainstream theories about the development of Judaeo-Christianity from the historical and archaeological perspective. And nothing in this account precludes belief in the divine origins of the Bible. In fact the emergence of monotheism from polytheism represents a kind of miracle in and of itself. The Jews were uniquely important in the history of the world and not because of dramatic miracles like the crossing of the Red Sea. They were, in a much more important sense, divinely inspired.

Canaan as a Syncretic Pressure Cooker

Wright argues that Judaeo-Christian monotheism evolved from Canaanite polytheism through a process called syncretism (wherein two or more gods combine to form a new god). Much of Wright’s book analyzes how and why this happened. My illustration attempts to show how the empires surrounding Canaan acted as a kind of imperial pressure cooker leading to new deity combinations not unlike the pressures inside a nuclear reactor which force individual particles to combine to form new ones.

The Ancient Canaanite Trinity:
Ywh (the flame), Baal (the husband), El (the father)

There were many deities in ancient Canaan, but three of them are central to the evolution of monotheism: Ywh, Baal, and El:

Ywh (also Yhwh or Yahweh) was originally a warrior god with transcendent attributes. He enters the archeological record as a deity of the Shasu people, a religious minority persecuted in Egypt who later settled in Southern Canaan (the possible origin of the Exodus story). I’ve illustrated Ywh as an upside down triangle in an attempt to show that he represents the transcendence of heaven coming down into the human heart as a “still small voice” or a “fire in the bones.” Elsewhere in the Bible Ywh takes the form of a burning bush or fire from heaven. I’ve therefore given Ywh the subtitle “the flame.”

Baal was a popular storm god who brought rain to farmers and fertility to families. Like Ywh, I’ve illustrated Baal as an upside down triangle because he is also a sky god who comes down from heaven. Baal is also the Hebrew name for “husband,” and in a sense the god Baal was the archetypal husband: protector, provider, and inseminator of the land. (See analysis of Psalm 29)

El was
  • i) the head god in a large pantheon of sons, daughters and wives, and
  • ii) a popular god in Northern Canaan, He was
  • iii) a nomadic deity who dwelt in a tent or tabernacle, and
  • iv) displayed the kind of patriarchal leadership that was emulated by kings and chieftains.

I’ve illustrated him as a right-side-up triangle to emphasize the fact that he acts within a hierarchy. (El is also the generic term for “god” in Hebrew, so it is sometimes confusing distinguishing between El Shaddai, the proper name for this god, Eloheim, the name for El’s pantheon, and el, the name used for god generically.)

The Archetypes Father, Husband, and Flame

Although Wright doesn’t go into this, I want to highlight the archetypal connotations of this ancient Canaanite trinity. The archetypes Father, Husband, and Flame are remarkably similar to the Catholic trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost:

El, the Father, and God the Father, [are] both the crown [ of] the hierarchies of their respective theologies. The “Son” in Catholic theology is often described as a husband or bridegroom, an archetype similar to the “husband” Baal. The Holy Ghost also has remarkable similarities to the Biblical depictions of Ywh as a flame of fire or a still small voice. While there may not be a direct link between these ancient deities and the development of the Catholic trinity, monotheistic conceptions of God seem to reflect many of the ancient polytheistic archetypes.
[re slater - the ancient biblical text had incorporated these imageries into itself which the later developing early church placed drafted into it's Nicean Creed in 325 AD and formally adopted in 381 AD at the Council of Constantinople irrespective of resulting "philosophic" arguments for and against the Trinity.]
Origins
  • The belief in the Trinity emerged around 33-34 AD, shortly after the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
  • The term "Trinity" was first used by Tertullian, a church father who lived from around 160–225 AD.
  • The New Testament passages that associate the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit include Matthew 28:19, which states "in the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit".
Influences
  • The Trinity doctrine has Pagan Egyptian-Semitic (Canaanite) roots, dating back to at least two centuries BC.
  • The Neoplatonist Plotinus' triad of the One, Intellect, and Soul may have also influenced the Trinity.
Development
  • The Trinity doctrine was brought into Christianity by the incipient, as-yet-unformed, Roman Catholic and Orthodox Church Councils before the Great Schism of 1054 AD between Roman and Orthodox Faiths.
  • The Trinity doctrine was central to many early Christian baptisms.


THE FIRST SYNCRETIC EVENT

Northern Ywh Worshippers + Southern El Worshippers
as Anit-Egypt Syncretic and Synchronising Alliances

There were two major syncretic events in ancient Canaan that were central to the formation of monotheism. One was a 9th century BC anti-Egyptian alliance between Ywh worshipers in the south and El worshipers in the north. This alliance may have been the origin of the covenant rites of Israelite worship wherein various tribes of Canaanites gathered together around important shrines to swear allegiance to El and appeal for his protection from their aggressive imperial neighbors. An anti-Egyptian alliance would make sense from the perspective of the Shasu, who had been persecuted by the Egyptians before. In this alliance El retains his position as the top god and Ywh becomes one of his sons (see Mark S. Smith analysis of Psalm 82 in Origins of Biblical Monotheism). El’s importance in Canaan was reduced after the Northern Kingdoms were carried away captive by the Assyrians in 722 BCE, the so called “lost ten tribes.”

The Shasu were Semitic-speaking, pastoral nomads from the Southern Levant, known to the ancient Egyptians as "nomads" or "Bedouin" who lived in the region to the east of Egypt, from the late Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age.

re slater - Here's a more detailed explanation from AI....

Who they were:
The Shasu were a group of semi-nomadic people, possibly Bedouin, who lived by raising livestock and were known from Egyptian texts, wall reliefs, and monuments dating from the 18th Dynasty (circa 1550–1295 B.C.E.) through the Third Intermediate Period (circa 1069–747 B.C.E.).

Where they lived:
They inhabited the Southern Levant, an area to the east of Egypt, including regions like the Jezreel Valley, Ashkelon, Transjordan, and the Sinai.

How they were viewed by Egyptians:
The Egyptians viewed the Shasu as "nomads" or "Bedouin", and they were often portrayed as brigands or mercenaries.

Possible meaning of the term "Shasu":
The term "Shasu" is thought to be related to the Egyptian verb "to wander" or the Semitic word "to plunder," but the exact origin is uncertain.

"Shasu of Yahweh":
There are references in Egyptian texts to "the land of the Shasu of Yahweh," which are the oldest references found in any ancient texts to the God Yahweh outside of the Old Testament.

THE SECOND SYNCRETIC EVENT

The Israelite nations and the Phoenician Empire, 7th Century

The second major syncretic event occurred during a 7th century BC alliance between the Israelite nations and the Phoenician Empire. According to Wright this event influenced the merger of Baal and Ywh which happened not through cooperation but through competition. The Bible gives a dramatic account of this competition in 1 Kings which tells the story of a conflict between the Israelite King Ahab, his Queen Jezebel and the Prophet Elijah. Jezebel was a Phoenician princess loyal to Baal, and her marriage to the Israelite Ahab represented an important alliance with Phoenicia that would help fend off threats from the aggressive Assyrian Empire. This gave political clout to worshipers of Baal and marginalized those loyal to Ywh. The worshipers of Ywh refused to go down without a fight. Their prophets decried the alliance and attempted to demonstrate that not only was Ywh a better god than Baal, he could also best Baal at his own game: bring rain in times of drought and stave off an Assyrian onslaught without the help of the Phoenicians. This conflict is depicted in the famous contest between the priests of Baal and Elijah. While this story was written long after it had supposedly occurred, it is nevertheless a remarkable illustration of the political situation at the time. Ywh upped his game, taking on the attributes of Baal in addition to his own so that he could be touted as a legitimate substitute for those who were partial to Baal and his generative powers.

Josiah

If there is any figure that comes closest to embodying the ugly Biblical violence celebrated in the Book of Joshua and elsewhere it is the Jewish king Josiah (641–610 BCE), who slaughtered the priests of other gods and enforced the complete domination of the cult of Ywh. While his reforms didn’t survive his reign, his accomplishments were celebrated by later Jewish scholars during the Babylonian captivity who recast him as a reformer reinstating an ancient monotheism laid down by the legendary prophets Moses and Abraham.



THE THIRD SYNCRETIC EVENT

The Babylonian Captivity and a New Monotheism

The Babylonian captivity is the most important event in the creation of Jewish monotheism:

During the captivity Jewish scholars compiled and edited what would become today’s Old Testament. Traditions associated with each of the three gods (Ywh, Baal, and El) were combined into a cohesive narrative and the three gods became one: a new, all powerful deity who wasn’t just better than the gods of other nations but was in fact the only God in existence.

Exactly how this happened is the subject of much controversy but the most well known theory is called the documentary hypothesis. While many of the details of the documentary hypothesis are disputed, historians generally agree that there were various factions among the exiled Jews, each loyal to different traditions and conceptions of God. Their contributions resulted in a Biblical God who is quite diverse, at times nationalistic and at times internationalist, both pro-ritual and anti-ritual, both interventionist and non-interventionist, etc.

WIKIPEDIA DIAGRAMS



re slater - JPED is an older theory which has been displaced by similar contemporary theories more in line with this article here:

Wikipedia diagrams of 20th century documentary hypothesis:

J - Yahwist (10th–9th century BCE)[1][2]
E - Elohist (9th century BCE)[1]
Dtr1 - Early (7th century BCE) Deuteronomist historian
Dtr2 - Later (6th century BCE) Deuteronomist historian
P* - Priestly (6th–5th century BCE)[3][2]
R - Redactor

Complicating the picture is the fact that Babylon was overtaken by the Persian Empire during the period of the captivity. The Persians allowed the Jews return to their homeland, but not without pressing the Jews to adopt a more globalist outlook. The Persians granted their people local control throughout the empire but wouldn’t tolerate belligerence. The so called “priestly source” of the documentary hypothesis was likely a pro-Persian faction among the Jews, one that emphasized the international, universal aspects of God as opposed to the nationalist Ywh. The priestly source uses El, not Ywh as God’s name and narrates stories from Elohist tradition like the story of Abraham.

In my chart I attempt to illustrate the Elohist emphasis during the captivity by enlarging the right-side-up triangle of El and merging it with Ywh’s upside-down triangle to create a new “star of David.”


THE FOURTH SYNCRETIC EVENT

The Evolution of Christianity

Jesus was a messianic Jew crucified by the Romans. However it wasn’t obvious to his followers what his death and resurrection was supposed to mean. There were many early versions of Christianity and they had widely divergent views. Robert Wright examines three main branches: Ebionite Christianity, Marcionism, and Pauline Christianity.

The Ebionites denied that Jesus was divine in any way. He was a messiah for the Jewish people and Christians were to continue to obey the Jewish laws of the Old Testament. Thus for Ebionite Christians, Jewish conceptions of God stayed intact.

Marcionism on the other hand held that Jesus had been sent by the true God and that he had defeated the evil god of the Old Testament. Therefore, the entire Jewish conception of God was to be done away with.

Somewhere in between the extremes of Marcionism and Ebionite Christianity is Pauline Christianity. A Jew himself, Paul believed that:

Jesus was the fulfillment of old Jewish law but that he did not overthrow the Jewish God.

Rather, Jesus was in some sense the God of both the Old and New Testament. This was a conception that would later evolve into the [pre-] Catholic Trinity.

Wright gives an extensive analysis as to why Pauline Christianity succeeded where other versions failed. Here is a brief summary:
"Christian missionaries relied initially on converts from the Jewish diaspora (which had occurred due to the collapse of the Alexandrian empire.) Jews scattered around the Hellenistic world were well regarded by the Greeks (who had also been scattered around the Mediterranean by the collapse of the Alexandrian empire). In fact many Greeks wanted to become Jews themselves although they balked at all the formal rules involved, particularly circumcision.Christianity was an attractive alternative. However Ebionite Christianity was too harsh and demanding, too much like existing Judaism. And Marcionism treated the Jews with contempt. In the end, Pauline Christianity represented a more ideal balance between Greek and Jewish culture.The newly baptized Greeks proclaimed that Jesus was “Socrates for the masses” and celebrated the God of both Old and New Testament as a single, universal Logos (stoicism) or One (neo-platonism)."
Wright’s thesis is informed by game theory and its notions of zero-sum and non-zero sum thinking. Both Marcionism and Ebionite Christianity were zero-sum religions. They either excluded the Jews or excluded the Gentiles. Pauline Christianity on the other hand was a non-zero sum phenomenon that allowed Greeks and Jews to come together in a way that enhanced the cultures and prospects of both groups.

Wright’s book goes on to discuss the development of Islam and skips over the development of the Catholic Trinity. At the top of my illustration however I’ve added a ven diagram with stocism and neo-platonism intersecting with Pauline Christianity. In my view, the Holy Trinity emerges from the combination of these three philosophical and religious traditions. This emergence was formalized by the great 4th and 5th century theologian St. Augustine. It’s a complicated topic I intend to cover more deeply in future posts. For this analysis I’ll only note that the Catholic conception of God was perhaps the greatest non-zero sum accomplishment of the human race up to that point. As Philosopher John Vervaeke points out, St. Augustine took the best philosophy (neoplatonic), the best theology (Christian), and the best psychology (stoic) of his day and melded it into a cohesive worldview so powerful that it would endure for over a thousand years, eventually giving birth to the modern world.