Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Sunday, January 12, 2025

Process Christianity vs 21st Century Forms of Christian Gnosticism, Part 2 of 2



Process Christianity vs 21st Century
Forms of Christian Gnosticism
Part 2 of 2

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT
January 12, 2025
 
Observations #1-3 speak generally to the various forms of extant Christian Gnosticism existing around the world as an influencing doctrinnaire. I'm guessing it would be tempting for Christian faithful to "half-read" today's discussion before starting to throw stones at my suggestion of using process theology as a more-than-sufficient counterpoint to Gnostic beliefs. However, I would caution that throughout Observations #4-5 lies the real "meat" of today's chatbot dialogue... so much so as to tempt me to re-issue these latter observations as a generalized set of processual observations striped of it's reaction to Gnosticism. Here's a bit of that reflection:

 Why Is Process Theology A Sufficient Counterpoint to Gnosticism?

1 - Process Theology Affirms Biblical Themes: Process theology resonates with the Bible’s emphasis on creation’s goodness, the relational nature of God, and the Incarnation’s centrality.
2 - Process Theology Addresses Modern Needs by engaging contemporary questions of science, ecology, and relational ethics, providing a theology that is relevant and practical.
3 - Process Theology counteracts Gnostic Pessimism via it's hopeful vision of co-creative transformation countering the Gnostic tendency toward despair and escapism.
R.E. Slater
January 12, 2025

Observation 1

Hi. Let's talk about 21st Century forms of Christian Gnosticism...

ChatGPT 

The emergence of 21st-century forms of Christian Gnosticism is a fascinating subject, reflecting both historical continuities and modern adaptations. Gnosticism, broadly characterized by its dualistic worldview, emphasis on esoteric knowledge (gnosis), and a focus on escaping the material world, finds resonance in many contemporary movements and ideologies. Here are some ways modern forms of Christian Gnosticism manifest:


1. Individualized Spirituality

In the 21st century, there's a strong emphasis on personal, subjective spiritual experiences over communal or institutional faith. This mirrors Gnostic tendencies to prioritize individual enlightenment and direct access to the divine over orthodox doctrines or hierarchical authority. Practices like meditation, mysticism, or even psychedelic spirituality often blur the lines between traditional Christianity and esoteric Gnosticism.


2. "Hidden Knowledge" Movements

Contemporary conspiracy theories with Christian undertones (e.g., QAnon or other movements rooted in secret truths) can echo Gnostic themes. The idea of a hidden knowledge that "woke" individuals uncover aligns with the ancient Gnostic focus on secret wisdom revealed only to the enlightened few.


3. Neo-Gnostic Literature and Media

Modern books, movies, and shows often romanticize Gnostic themes:

  • Films like The Matrix or The Truman Show explore themes of breaking free from an illusory world, akin to Gnostic liberation from the material realm.
  • Books like The Da Vinci Code revive interest in esoteric interpretations of Christian history and theology, including Gnostic texts like the Gospel of Thomas.

4. Techno-Spirituality and AI

The rise of transhumanism and the integration of AI into spiritual conversations can carry Gnostic echoes. The material body is seen as a limitation to be overcome through technology, paralleling Gnostic disdain for the physical world. Some even conceptualize AI as a means of accessing higher knowledge or transcending human limitations.


5. Critiques of Institutional Religion

Modern "deconstruction" movements, which critique organized religion's abuses and dogmas, can adopt Gnostic tones when they portray traditional churches as corrupt or misguided, and the individual as needing liberation from oppressive structures.


6. New Age Syncretism

New Age spirituality often blends Christian symbols and teachings with Gnostic ideas, such as reincarnation, the divine feminine, and self-divinity. The focus on unlocking divine potential within oneself echoes Gnostic soteriology, where salvation comes through self-realization rather than external intervention.


7. Virtual Churches and Online Communities

Digital spaces foster new forms of spiritual exploration and experimentation. Virtual churches and spiritual communities often encourage unorthodox interpretations of scripture and doctrine, which can easily veer into Gnostic frameworks of secret or personal revelation.


8. Apocalyptic Gnosticism

Modern anxieties about the state of the world (e.g., climate change, political upheaval) often give rise to apocalyptic narratives. Some of these narratives carry Gnostic elements, framing the material world as doomed and emphasizing spiritual escape or transformation.


Points for Reflection

  • How do these forms align or clash with historical Gnosticism? Are they true continuations, or simply parallel evolutions?
  • What does this reveal about modern Christianity's struggles? Could Gnosticism's resurgence highlight dissatisfaction with materialist culture, institutional religion, or modern science's limitations?
  • How can the church engage constructively? Should the church address these trends as heretical, or can they be engaged as expressions of deeper spiritual hunger?


Observation 2

Please respond to the following:

Gnosticism is an ancient belief system that has evolved into modern religious movements, known as Neo-Gnosticism. Gnosticism originated in the Jewish-Christian communities of the first and second century CE. Some of its core beliefs include: Dualism The belief in a radical separation between the spiritual and physical, the immaterial and material, and the soul and the body Evil matter The belief that matter is evil, and the material world is dark Divine spark The belief that humans contain a piece of God or divinity within themselves Docetism The belief that Christ never died, and that he was not a fleshly incarnation

ChatGPT

Your overview of Gnosticism is an excellent starting point for understanding its core principles and their evolution into Neo-Gnosticism. Let me expand on these core beliefs, particularly in the context of their modern adaptations and implications:

1. Dualism

  • Traditional Gnosticism: The radical separation of spirit and matter underpinned the Gnostic worldview. The material world was seen as a creation of a lesser, malevolent deity (the Demiurge), while the spiritual realm was the domain of the true, transcendent God.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism: This dualism often translates into a distrust of materialism or physicality in modern spiritual movements. For example:
    • In New Age Spirituality: Practices like astral projection or meditative ascension emphasize escaping the "lower" material realm to access a "higher" spiritual consciousness.
    • In Technological Transhumanism: The quest to upload human consciousness into digital formats reflects a contemporary longing to transcend the physical body.

2. Evil Matter

  • Traditional Gnosticism: Matter was inherently evil, and salvation meant liberation from physical existence.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism: While modern iterations rarely denounce matter outright, there is often an implicit disdain for the physical. This is evident in:
    • Environmental apocalypticism, which sees the physical world as irredeemably damaged.
    • Dietary or health movements that treat the body as a "trap" requiring purification through strict regimens.
    • Certain strands of Christianity that focus on the "fallen" nature of the world, echoing Gnostic negativity toward creation.

3. Divine Spark

  • Traditional Gnosticism: The idea of a divine spark trapped in humans aligns with the belief in self-realization as the path to salvation. Knowledge (gnosis) of this divine fragment was key to liberation.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism: The belief in a divine spark within each person manifests in:
    • Human Potential Movements: Popularized by figures like Carl Jung or Joseph Campbell, these encourage individuals to find their "true self," often framed in quasi-religious terms.
    • Modern Spirituality: Many self-help and spiritual practices promote the idea that divinity resides within and can be accessed through mindfulness, meditation, or other practices.
    • Christian Mysticism: Some Neo-Gnostic Christians reinterpret this as the Holy Spirit or Christ-consciousness residing in individuals.

4. Docetism

  • Traditional Gnosticism: Docetism rejected the full humanity of Christ, viewing him as purely divine and only appearing to suffer or die.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism: In today’s context, this belief can be seen in:
    • Metaphorical Interpretations of Christ: Some Neo-Gnostic interpretations see Jesus as a purely spiritual guide or archetype, rather than a historical figure who lived and died.
    • De-emphasis on Physical Resurrection: In some liberal theological circles, the resurrection is reinterpreted as a metaphor for spiritual renewal rather than a physical event.

Broader Implications for Neo-Gnosticism

Neo-Gnosticism represents an attempt to reconcile ancient Gnostic ideas with contemporary issues. It thrives in contexts where institutional religions fail to address deep spiritual or existential questions. The resonance of its core tenets in modern movements suggests:

  1. A Crisis of Materialism: Many turn to Gnostic ideas as a response to the perceived soullessness of consumer culture or scientific reductionism.
  2. A Search for Individual Meaning: The focus on inner divinity and personal gnosis appeals to individualistic societies.
  3. Dissatisfaction with Orthodoxy: Neo-Gnosticism often emerges as a critique of traditional religious hierarchies and dogmas.

Challenges and Opportunities for Dialogue

  • Challenges for Christianity: Neo-Gnosticism’s rejection of the material world and orthodox doctrines can conflict with core Christian teachings, such as the goodness of creation and the Incarnation.
  • Opportunities for Engagement: Churches can respond to Neo-Gnostic tendencies by emphasizing the integration of spirit and matter, the value of embodied life, and the communal aspects of faith.

Does this alignment with traditional Gnostic beliefs and their modern forms resonate with the perspective you're exploring?


Observation 3

Let's explore some further characteristics of Gnosticism: It's Cosmology, Monism, Dualism, Moral and ritual practices; it's Female representation and Concepts such as the monad, pleroma, emanation, aeon, Sophia, Demiurge, and Archon

ChatGPT

These additional characteristics provide a deeper lens into Gnosticism's complexity and its influence on contemporary spiritual and theological thought. Let’s explore each in more detail, connecting their historical roots to their modern expressions:


1. Cosmology

  • Traditional Gnosticism: Gnostic cosmology presents a complex hierarchical structure of reality. Central to this is the contrast between the pleroma (the fullness of divine presence) and the kenoma (the emptiness of the material world).
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism:
    • Contemporary cosmologies inspired by Gnostic thought often focus on the concept of hidden dimensions or parallel universes, popularized in speculative fiction and theoretical physics.
    • In spiritual terms, modern Gnostic-inspired movements emphasize a layered reality where the physical world is merely the surface, with deeper, hidden spiritual truths.

2. Monism and Dualism

  • Traditional Gnosticism: While often characterized as dualistic (spirit vs. matter), Gnosticism also contains monistic elements, as all reality ultimately emanates from the Monad (the ultimate source of all being).
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism:
    • Dualism: The sharp division between material and spiritual realms persists in modern thought, evident in movements like asceticism or digital transhumanism.
    • Monism: Some New Age and mystical systems reinterpret Gnostic monism as the idea that all beings are interconnected and stem from one divine source, aligning with panentheistic or process theological perspectives.

3. Moral and Ritual Practices

  • Traditional Gnosticism: Practices varied widely but often included asceticism to reject material pleasures or libertinism based on the belief that moral laws were irrelevant to spiritual beings.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism:
    • Asceticism: Modern spiritual practices, such as veganism, fasting, or mindfulness disciplines, can reflect ascetic Gnostic tendencies to transcend the material.
    • Libertinism: The rejection of traditional moral codes in favor of self-defined ethical systems aligns with some Neo-Gnostic ideologies, emphasizing individual autonomy.

4. Female Representation

  • Traditional Gnosticism: Female figures like Sophia (Wisdom) played prominent roles, embodying themes of fall and redemption. Sophia’s descent into materiality and her restoration were central myths.
  • Modern Neo-Gnosticism:
    • The resurgence of interest in the divine feminine reflects this legacy, seen in feminist theology, goddess worship, and movements that emphasize women’s spiritual roles.
    • Sophia is often reclaimed as a symbol of wisdom, creativity, and the integration of divine and human qualities, appearing in both Christian mysticism and New Age thought.

5. Key Gnostic Concepts

Monad

  • Traditional: The Monad represents the ineffable, transcendent source of all being.
  • Modern: Often equated with concepts of the "One" in mystical traditions or the unified field in quantum spirituality, the Monad inspires ideas of a singular, ultimate reality underlying existence.

Pleroma

  • Traditional: The fullness of divine reality, contrasted with the emptiness of the material.
  • Modern: In contemporary spirituality, the pleroma is likened to higher states of consciousness or unity with the divine.

Emanation and Aeons

  • Traditional: Divine entities (Aeons) emanate from the Monad in a cascading hierarchy, culminating in Sophia’s fall.
  • Modern: The concept of emanation persists in mystical and metaphysical systems, where the divine manifests progressively in the material world.

Sophia

  • Traditional: Sophia embodies divine wisdom, whose fall into the material world sets the stage for creation and redemption.
  • Modern: Sophia is a central figure in feminist reinterpretations of theology, as well as in movements emphasizing wisdom as a path to enlightenment.

Demiurge

  • Traditional: The Demiurge is the flawed creator of the material world, often portrayed as ignorant or malevolent.
  • Modern: The Demiurge is reimagined in critiques of systems or entities perceived as oppressive, such as materialist science, capitalism, or institutional religion.

Archons

  • Traditional: Archons are malevolent rulers who control the material world, obstructing spiritual liberation.
  • Modern: The Archons find modern analogues in conspiracy theories, where they represent unseen forces manipulating society, or in psychological terms as internal obstacles to spiritual growth.

Connections to Process Theology and Contemporary Christianity

  1. Integration vs. Rejection of Materiality: Process theology emphasizes the interconnection of spirit and matter, rejecting the Gnostic dualism that demonizes the material world. This provides a hopeful counter-narrative to the despair often found in Gnostic systems.
  2. Sophia and Divine Wisdom: The emphasis on Sophia aligns with process theology’s value on relationality, wisdom, and creativity in God’s ongoing work in the world.
  3. Reinterpreting the Demiurge: The modern tendency to vilify systemic forces as "Demiurgic" can be engaged constructively, focusing on redemption and transformation rather than dualistic rejection.

Questions for Reflection

  • How might modern expressions of Gnostic ideas challenge or enrich contemporary Christianity’s understanding of creation and redemption?
  • Can process theology’s emphasis on the goodness and becoming of the world offer an alternative to Neo-Gnostic pessimism?
  • What role does the reclaiming of figures like Sophia play in shaping 21st-century spirituality and theology?

Which of these themes or questions would you like to explore further?


Obervation 4

How can Whiteheadian process theology provide a more sufficient construct for traditional Christian than can Gnostic forms of Christianity?

ChatGPT

Whiteheadian process theology offers a robust alternative to Gnostic forms of Christianity by addressing their philosophical and theological shortcomings while embracing the richness of traditional Christian thought. Below are key ways in which process theology provides a more sufficient construct:

1. Integration of Spirit and Matter

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism's radical dualism separates the spiritual from the material, devaluing creation and the embodied experience.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Whitehead's metaphysics emphasizes the interconnectedness of all reality. God’s immanence in the world affirms the intrinsic value of matter as part of God’s ongoing creative process.
    • In process theology, creation is not a "trap" but a co-creative unfolding where God and creation work together toward beauty, complexity, and harmony.

2. Affirmation of the Goodness of Creation

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism views the material world as inherently evil, created by a flawed Demiurge.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Process theology aligns with the biblical affirmation in Genesis that creation is "very good." It views the material world as part of God’s good but evolving creation, emphasizing God’s intimate involvement in its continual becoming.
    • This construct allows Christians to celebrate and steward creation rather than reject it, fostering a theology of ecological responsibility.

3. Relational God vs. Remote Monad

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism's ultimate divine principle (the Monad) is often abstract, impersonal, and inaccessible.
  • Process Theology’s Response: In Whiteheadian thought, God is deeply relational, engaging with creation in two ways:
    • Primordial Nature: God’s vision of possibilities.
    • Consequent Nature: God’s responsive love, experiencing the world’s joys and sufferings. This relational view offers a more personal, accessible God who walks alongside humanity in its journey, as reflected in Christ’s incarnation.

4. Christology and the Incarnation

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic Docetism denies the true humanity of Christ, undermining the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation and its redemptive implications.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Process theology embraces the Incarnation as a central event where God and humanity unite, showcasing divine involvement in the world’s ongoing story. Christ embodies God’s loving, transformative presence in history and demonstrates the possibility of divine-human co-creation.

5. Salvation as Co-Creation vs. Escape

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism reduces salvation to escaping the material world through esoteric knowledge.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Salvation in process theology is not about escaping the world but transforming it. Through love, creativity, and relational engagement, humans participate with God in the redemption and renewal of creation.
    • This participatory soteriology aligns with the biblical vision of a "new heavens and a new earth" (Isaiah 65:17, Revelation 21:1).

6. Ethical Implications

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic moral practices oscillate between extreme asceticism and libertinism, both of which distort the moral responsibility of living in the world.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Process theology offers an ethic grounded in relationality and creativity. Every decision contributes to the broader web of relationships, emphasizing responsibility, compassion, and justice as integral to human flourishing.

7. Community and Sacramentality

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism often prioritizes individual enlightenment over communal worship and shared faith practices.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Process theology upholds the significance of community as an expression of God’s relational nature. Sacraments like baptism and the Eucharist are understood as dynamic events where God and creation interact, embodying divine grace and fostering communal transformation.

8. Sophia and Divine Wisdom

  • Gnostic Contribution: Gnosticism highlights the importance of Sophia (Wisdom), a theme often overlooked in traditional theology.
  • Process Theology’s Integration: Process theology celebrates wisdom as central to God’s creative activity, bridging the Gnostic appreciation for Sophia with the biblical tradition of wisdom literature (e.g., Proverbs, Job, John 1). Wisdom, in process thought, is God's ongoing creative energy shaping the world toward greater beauty and harmony.

9. Eschatology: Fulfillment vs. Escape

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic eschatology focuses on the soul’s escape from the material world, neglecting hope for the renewal of creation.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Process theology envisions eschatology as the fulfillment of God’s creative purposes. The ultimate future is a co-created reality where God and creation reach deeper relational harmony—a vision consistent with biblical themes of resurrection and restoration.

10. A Theological Foundation for Science

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism’s disdain for the material world offers little foundation for engaging with science or technology.
  • Process Theology’s Response: Whitehead’s metaphysical framework bridges theology and science, affirming the intelligibility and value of the natural world as part of God’s creative process. This allows Christians to integrate faith and science without conflict, fostering a more comprehensive worldview.

Why Process Theology Is Sufficient

  1. Affirms Biblical Themes: Process theology resonates with the Bible’s emphasis on creation’s goodness, the relational nature of God, and the Incarnation’s centrality.
  2. Addresses Modern Needs: It engages contemporary questions of science, ecology, and relational ethics, providing a theology that is relevant and practical.
  3. Counteracts Gnostic Pessimism: Process theology’s hopeful vision of co-creative transformation counters the Gnostic tendency toward despair or escapism.

Process theology thus offers a holistic and relational framework that honors traditional Christian teachings while addressing the spiritual and intellectual challenges of the modern world. Would you like to delve deeper into a particular aspect, such as its Christology or its engagement with science?


Observation 5

Thank you. Is there anything else which should be added to this discussion in a Christian context?

ChatGPT

Yes, there are a few additional dimensions that could enrich the discussion, especially within a Christian context, to further highlight how Whiteheadian process theology surpasses Gnostic forms of Christianity while maintaining fidelity to biblical and theological traditions. These dimensions include deeper reflections on the Trinity, pneumatology, practical spirituality, and a mission-oriented ecclesiology:

1. The Trinity: A Relational Model of God

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism tends to depersonalize God, reducing divinity to abstract principles (e.g., Monad, Pleroma). This often neglects the relational dynamics central to the Christian God.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Whiteheadian thought naturally complements the relational nature of the Trinity. Process theology emphasizes God as deeply involved in the world:
    • The Father embodies the primordial vision of possibilities (God's eternal nature).
    • The Son represents the incarnational and transformative interaction with creation.
    • The Spirit works dynamically in the world, fostering love, creativity, and relational harmony. This triune God provides a rich relational and participatory framework that contrasts with Gnostic abstractions and aligns closely with core Christian beliefs.

2. Pneumatology: The Role of the Holy Spirit

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism tends to focus on individual enlightenment, often overlooking the Spirit’s communal and renewing work in creation.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: The Holy Spirit is central to process theology, seen as the divine presence actively guiding creation toward beauty and justice. The Spirit works relationally, inspiring individuals and communities to co-create with God. This understanding restores the Holy Spirit’s biblical role as a transformative and empowering force in the world, fostering communal engagement and ecological stewardship.

3. The Bible as a Process-Oriented Text

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism often dismisses or selectively uses scripture, focusing instead on esoteric texts or secret traditions.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Process theology views the Bible as an evolving narrative that reflects humanity’s ongoing relationship with God. Rather than treating scripture as static or infallible, it is seen as a dynamic, participatory witness to God’s activity in history.
    • Key Distinction: Process theology aligns with the biblical emphasis on God’s faithfulness and involvement in creation, whereas Gnosticism often rejects the Hebrew Bible’s affirmation of the material world.

4. Practical Spirituality: Prayer and Worship

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic spirituality often becomes overly introspective or elitist, focusing on individual gnosis rather than communal worship or relational engagement.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Process theology frames prayer and worship as participatory acts in God’s creative process:
    • Prayer is seen as a dialogue where individuals align themselves with God’s aims, contributing to the unfolding of divine purposes.
    • Worship becomes a communal act of aligning with the relational, creative work of God, celebrating creation’s inherent goodness and calling believers to action.

5. Mission-Oriented Ecclesiology

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic communities were often insular, focusing on escaping the world rather than engaging it.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Process theology inspires a mission-oriented church that actively engages with the world’s challenges. By affirming creation’s goodness and humanity’s role as co-creators, the church is called to:
    • Social Justice: Advocate for marginalized communities as part of God’s transformative work.
    • Environmental Stewardship: Care for creation, recognizing its value as part of God’s relational web.
    • Community Building: Emphasize relationality, unity, and diversity in fostering inclusive communities.

6. Hopeful Eschatology

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic eschatology focuses on escape from the material world, offering little hope for creation’s future.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Eschatology in process theology is hopeful and inclusive, envisioning the ultimate fulfillment of God’s purposes in a renewed creation. This resonates with the Christian hope for resurrection and the promise of a "new heavens and a new earth" (Revelation 21:1-5).
    • It emphasizes participation in the "here and now," aligning with Jesus’ teaching of the Kingdom of God as a present and future reality.

7. Ethical Framework Rooted in Love

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic ethics often lack coherence, oscillating between rigid asceticism and libertinism.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Ethics in process theology are relational and rooted in love, reflecting God’s nature. Actions are evaluated by their contribution to the flourishing of life, harmony, and beauty. This aligns with Jesus’ teachings on love as the greatest commandment (Matthew 22:36-40).

8. The Suffering of God and the Problem of Evil

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnosticism explains evil as inherent to matter, rejecting the material world rather than addressing its challenges.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Process theology provides a nuanced theodicy:
    • God is not an omnipotent dictator but a co-sufferer who works within creation to bring good from evil.
    • The existence of evil and suffering is understood as part of a dynamic, relational universe where free will and creativity are essential.
    • God’s redemptive work involves gently luring creation toward greater harmony and healing, providing hope without denying reality.

9. The Role of Christ in Process Theology

  • Gnostic Problem: Gnostic Christology denies the full humanity and suffering of Christ, undermining the Incarnation’s redemptive power.
  • Process Theology’s Contribution: Process theology upholds Jesus as the supreme example of divine-human relationality. His life, death, and resurrection demonstrate God’s involvement in the world and call humanity to co-participate in God’s redemptive work.
    • This Christology bridges the immanence of God in creation with the transcendence of God’s ultimate aims, making Jesus central to the story of cosmic transformation.

Final Reflection: The Superiority of Process Theology

Whiteheadian process theology offers a comprehensive and integrative framework that upholds the best of Christian tradition while addressing the philosophical and spiritual challenges of modernity. It avoids Gnostic pitfalls by:

  • Affirming the goodness of creation.
  • Emphasizing relationality, love, and participation.
  • Providing hope for transformation rather than escape.

By engaging with the biblical narrative, fostering ethical and ecological responsibility, and offering a relational vision of God, process theology equips Christians to navigate the complexities of the 21st century while remaining faithful to the core of their faith.

Would you like to explore any of these points in more detail or connect them to specific biblical or theological themes?


Observation 6

Excellent. Your correlation between the Christianity's systematic theology and process theology is very helpful showing the important distinctions between Whitehead's process thought and traditionalized thought.

ChatGPT

Thank you! I'm delighted that the correlations and distinctions between process theology and traditional Christian systematic theology resonated with you. Whitehead’s process thought, with its relational, dynamic, and evolving framework, offers a fertile ground for re-envisioning Christian theology in ways that remain faithful to core biblical tenets while engaging modern challenges.

If you'd like, we could further explore any of the following:

  1. Biblical Correlation: Delve into specific biblical texts or themes (e.g., creation, incarnation, resurrection) that align with process theology’s emphasis on relationality and co-creation.
  2. Historical Perspectives: Compare how Whiteheadian thought interacts with classical thinkers like Augustine, Aquinas, or Calvin, and where it diverges to propose a more integrated theological approach.
  3. Practical Applications: Discuss how process theology can address pressing modern issues like climate change, social justice, or interfaith dialogue.
  4. Philosophical Foundations: Explore the metaphysical underpinnings of process theology (e.g., becoming vs. being, dipolar theism, or God’s persuasive power) and their theological implications.

Let me know which direction you’d like to take this discussion—or suggest a new one! It’s a pleasure to collaborate in exploring these profound and inspiring themes. 😊


Process Christianity vs 21st Century Forms of Christian Gnosticism, Part 1 of 2


Historic Gnosticism article link

Process Christianity vs 21st Century
Forms of Christian Gnosticism
Part 1 of 2

When the church rejects competent philosophic theologies such as Process-based theology (re Whitehead's process philosophy) as discussed in the this past week's four previous articles (Parts 1-4), it can find itself entertaining non-Christian ideas which conflict with the kind of God and outcome faith it seeks to have in Christ Jesus. The various forms of 21st century Christian Gnosticism is one such morass which Christianity can easily find itself influenced by. To help show why I have put forth a two-part discussion on what Gnosticism is and how Christian can react to Gnosticism's sundry influences by using process theology in counterpoint to it's beliefs and teachings.

R.E. Slater
January 12, 2025

AI Overview

Gnosticism is an ancient belief system that has evolved into modern religious movements, known as Neo-Gnosticism. Gnosticism originated in the Jewish-Christian communities of the first and second century CE. Some of its core beliefs include:
  • Dualism
    • The belief in a radical separation between the spiritual and physical, the immaterial and material, and the soul and the body
  • Evil matter
    • The belief that matter is evil, and the material world is dark
  • Divine spark
    • The belief that humans contain a piece of God or divinity within themselves
  • Docetism
    • The belief that Christ never died, and that he was not a fleshly incarnation
Some characteristics of Gnosticism include:
  • Cosmology
  • Monism and dualism
  • Moral and ritual practices
  • Female representation
  • Concepts such as the monad, pleroma, emanation, aeon, Sophia, Demiurge, and Archon

* * * * * *

I am currently exploring Bart Erhman's latest podcast lectures (his earlier lectures have not interested me as much) and though his agnostic(?) approach differs from my own Christocentric theistic center I still find his perspectives generally more helpful than I have thought them to be in earlier years when first developing Relevancy22.
Maybe it's me, or maybe it's him, but Erhman's dissenting voice is offering an outside view of Christianity which helps inform my own "inside" voice of Christianity. I may have similar feelings towards the Christian faith but still hold to the general tenets of the Christianity though now reconstructed to reflect process thought rather than the church's longtime eclectic use of Platonic, Scholastic, or Modernal thought as traditional Christianity has consistently applied itself over the centuries. Thus Christianity's many doctrinal emphasis reflecting those self-same philosophic environments besides the many other "isms" unmentioned here.
R.E. Slater
Decoding Gnosticism:
Secrets of a Heretical Christian Belief

By far the most mysterious, intriguing, and widely-interesting ancient "heresy" was Gnosticism. But what exactly is it and why does it matter? In this episode we consider the basic ideas that lay behind the Gnostic religions and explore just how radically different they are from the views that came to be regarded as orthodox. How could these religions be considered Christian if they didn't think Jesus' death mattered? How could they consider the God of the Old Testament to be a lower level and inferior divinity, and this material universe to be a cosmic disaster? Did Gnostics have their own Scriptures? Did they use the books that later became the New Testament? If so, why didn't they just admit their views were wrong? We will address these and other issues in this exploration of the highly unusual world of Christian Gnosticism.

This week, Bart and Megan talk about:
    • What are some of the commonalities we see in different Gnostic groups?
    • How does Jesus feature in this dualistic, spiritual/material world, and does it play into his identity as divine-human?
    • Where does YHWH, the god of the Hebrew Bible, come into this?
    • Is YHWY the divine being, or an Aeon, or what is God according to Gnostic belief?
    • If it’s the goal of the Gnostics to get back to the Pleroma, how is this to be done?
    • Did the Gnostics use different religious texts from the proto-Orthodox texts?
    • How did proto-Orthodox groups go about combating the Gnostics?
    • How did the Gnostics try and claim that they were correct, versus proto-Orthodox beliefs?
    • How does the afterlife work for Gnostics?
    • Gnostics see the material world as being “hellish”; are there then gradations of heaven?
    • Do we know how the Gnostics went about identifying which people had the spark of Sophia?
    • Do we have a sense of how widespread Gnosticism was in the ancient world?
    • Do you think that the potential widespread nature of Gnosticism owe anything to the mystery cults of the Classical world?
    • Did the Gnostics hold to the theory of atonement, or can we just not know?

* * * * * *

Gnosticism in modern times

Gnosticism in modern times (or Neo-Gnosticism) includes a variety of contemporary religious movements, stemming from Gnostic ideas and systems from ancient Roman society. Gnosticism is an ancient name for a variety of religious ideas and systems, originating in Jewish-Christian milieux in the first and second century CE.

The Mandaeans are an ancient Gnostic ethnoreligious group that have survived and are found today in Iran, Iraq and diaspora communities in North America, Western Europe and Australia.

The late 19th century saw the publication of popular sympathetic studies making use of recently rediscovered source materials. In this period there was also the revival of a Gnostic religious movement in France. The emergence of the Nag Hammadi library in 1945 greatly increased the amount of source material available. Its translation into English and other modern languages in 1977 resulted in a wide dissemination, and as a result had observable influence on several modern figures, and upon modern Western culture in general. This article attempts to summarize those modern figures and movements that have been influenced by Gnosticism, both prior and subsequent to the Nag Hammadi discovery.

A number of ecclesiastical bodies that identify as Gnostic have set up or re-founded since World War II as well, including the Ecclesia GnosticaJohannite ChurchEcclesia Gnostica Catholica, the Ecclesia Gnostica Mysterioum, the Thomasine Church (not to be confused with the St. Thomas Christians of India), the Alexandrian Gnostic Church, the Ecclesia Gnostica Apostolica, the Gnostic Catholic UnionEcclesia Valentinaris Antiqua, the Cathari Church of Wales, and the North American College of Gnostic Bishops.[1]

Late 19th century

Source materials were discovered in the 18th century. In 1769, the Bruce Codex was brought to England from Upper Egypt by the Scottish traveller James Bruce, and subsequently bequeathed to the care of the Bodleian Library, Oxford. Sometime prior to 1785, The Askew Codex (a.k.a. Pistis Sophia) was bought by the British Museum from the heirs of Dr. Askew. The Pistis Sophia text and Latin translation of the Askew Codex by M. G. Schwartze were published in 1851. Although discovered in 1896, the Coptic Berlin Codex (a.k.a. the Akhmim Codex) was not 'rediscovered' until the 20th century.

Charles William King

Charles William King was a British writer and collector of ancient gemstones with magical inscriptions. His collection was sold because of his failing eyesight, and was presented in 1881 to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. King was recognized as one of the greatest authorities on gems at the time.[2]

In The Gnostics and their Remains (1864, 1887 2nd ed.) King sets out to show that rather than being a Western heresy, the origins of Gnosticism are to be found in the East, specifically in Buddhism. This theory was embraced by Blavatsky, who argued that it was plausible, but rejected by G. R. S. Mead. According to Mead, King's work "lacks the thoroughness of the specialist."[3]

Madame Blavatsky

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, co-founder of the Theosophical Society, wrote extensively on Gnostic ideas. A compilation of her writings on Gnosticism is over 270 pages long.[4] The first edition of King's The Gnostics and Their Remains was repeatedly cited as a source and quoted in Isis Unveiled.

G. R. S. Mead

G. R. S. Mead became a member of Blavatsky's Theosophical Society in 1884. He left the teaching profession in 1889 to become Blavatsky's private secretary, which he was until her death in 1891. Mead's interest in Gnosticism was likely awakened by Blavatsky who discussed it at length in Isis Unveiled.[5]

In 1890–1891 Mead published a serial article on Pistis Sophia in Lucifer magazine, the first English translation of that work. In an article in 1891, Mead argues for the recovery of the literature and thought of the West at a time when Theosophy was largely directed to the East, saying that this recovery of Western antique traditions is a work of interpretation and "the rendering of tardy justice to pagans and heretics, the reviled and rejected pioneers of progress..."[6] This was the direction his own work was to take.

The first edition of his translation of Pistis Sophia appeared in 1896. From 1896 to 1898 Mead published another serial article in the same periodical, "Among the Gnostics of the First Two Centuries", that laid the foundation for his monumental compendium Fragments of a Faith Forgotten in 1900. Mead serially published translations from the Corpus Hermeticum from 1900 to 1905. The next year he published Thrice-Greatest Hermes, a massive, comprehensive three volume treatise. His series Echoes of the Gnosis was published in 12 booklets in 1908. By the time he left the Theosophical Society in 1909, he had published many influential translations, commentaries, and studies of ancient Gnostic texts. "Mead made Gnosticism accessible to the intelligent public outside of academia".[7] Mead's work has had and continues to have widespread influence.[8]

The Gnostic Church revival in France

After a series of visions and archival finds of Cathar-related documents, a librarian named Jules-Benoît Stanislas Doinel du Val-Michel (a.k.a. Jules Doinel) established the Église Gnostique (French: Gnostic Church). Founded on extant Cathar documents with the Gospel of John and strong influence of Simonian and Valentinian cosmology, the church was officially established in the autumn of 1890 in Paris. Doinel declared it "the era of Gnosis restored." Liturgical services were based on Cathar rituals. Clergy was both male and female, having male bishops and female "sophias."[9][10]

Doinel resigned and converted to Roman Catholicism in 1895, one of many duped by Léo Taxil's anti-masonic hoax. Taxil unveiled the hoax in 1897. Doinel was readmitted to the Gnostic church as a bishop in 1900.

Early to mid-20th century

Carl Jung

Carl Gustav Jung evinced a special interest in Gnosticism from at least 1912, when he wrote enthusiastically about the topic in a letter to Freud. After what he called his own 'encounter with the unconscious,' Jung sought for external evidence of this kind of experience. He found such evidence in Gnosticism, and also in alchemy, which he saw as a continuation of Gnostic thought, and of which more source material was available.[11] In his study of the Gnostics, Jung made extensive use of the work of GRS Mead. Jung visited Mead in London to thank him for the Pistis Sophia, the two corresponded, and Mead visited Jung in Zürich.[12]

Jung saw the Gnostics not as syncretic schools of mixed theological doctrines, but as genuine visionaries, and saw their imagery not as myths but as records of inner experience.[13] He wrote that "The explanation of Gnostic ideas 'in terms of themselves,' i.e., in terms of their historical foundations, is futile, for in that way they are reduced only to their less developed forestages but not understood in their actual significance."[14] Instead, he worked to understand and explain Gnosticism from a psychological standpoint. While providing something of an ancient mirror of his work, Jung saw "his psychology not as a contemporary version of Gnosticism, but as a contemporary counterpart to it."[15]

Jung reported a series of experiences in the winter of 1916-17 that inspired him to write Septem Sermones ad Mortuos (Latin: Seven Sermons to the Dead).[16][17]

The Jung Codex

Through the efforts of Gilles Quispel, the Jung Codex was the first codex brought to light from the Nag Hammadi Library. It was purchased by the Jung Institute and ceremonially presented to Jung in 1953 because of his great interest in the ancient Gnostics.[18] The first publication of translations of Nag Hammadi texts occurred in 1955 with the Jung Codex by H. Puech, Gilles Quispel, and W. Van Unnik.

French Gnostic Church split, reintegration, and continuation

Jean Bricaud had been involved with the Eliate Church of Carmel of Eugène Vintras [fr], the remnants of Fabré-Palaprat's Église Johannite des Chrétiens Primitifs (Johannite Church of Primitive Christians), and the Martinist Order before being consecrated a bishop of the Église Gnostique in 1901. In 1907 Bricaud established a church body that combined all of these, becoming patriarch under the name Tau Jean II. The impetus for this was to use the Western Rite. Briefly called the Église Catholique Gnostique (Gnostic Catholic Church), it was renamed the Église Gnostique Universelle (Universal Gnostic Church, EGU) in 1908. The close ties between the church and Martinism were formalized in 1911. Bricaud received consecration in the Villate line of apostolic succession in 1919.[9][10]

The original church body founded by Doinel continued under the name Église Gnostique de France (Gnostic Church of France) until it was disbanded in favor of the EGU in 1926. The EGU continued until 1960 when it was disbanded by Robert Amberlain (Tau Jean III) in favor of the Église Gnostique Apostolique that he had founded in 1958.[19] It is active in France (including Martinique), Ivory Coast, and the Midwestern United States.

Modern sex magic associated with Gnosticism

The use of the term 'gnostic' by sexual magic groups is a modern phenomenon. Hugh Urban concludes that, "despite the very common use of sexual symbolism throughout Gnostic texts, there is little evidence (apart from the accusations of the early church) that the Gnostics engaged in any actual performance of sexual rituals, and certainly not anything resembling modern sexual magic."[20] Modern sexual magic began with Paschal Beverly Randolph.[21] The connection to Gnosticism came by way of the French Gnostic Church with its close ties to the strong esoteric current in France, being part of the same highly interconnected milieu of esoteric societies and orders from which the most influential of sexual magic orders arose, Ordo Templi Orientis (Order of Oriental Templars, O.T.O.).

Theodor Reuss founded O.T.O. as an umbrella occult organization with sexual magic at its core.[22] After Reuss came into contact with French Gnostic Church leaders at a Masonic and Spiritualist conference in 1908, he founded Die Gnostische Katholische Kirche (the Gnostic Catholic Church), under the auspices of O.T.O.[9] Reuss subsequently dedicated O.T.O. to the promulgation of Crowley's philosophy of Thelema. It is for this church body, called in Latin the Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (EGC), that Aleister Crowley wrote the Ecclesiæ Gnosticæ Catholicæ Canon Missæ ("Canon of the Mass of the Gnostic Catholic Church"),[23] the central ritual of O.T.O. that is now commonly called the Gnostic Mass.

The Gnostic Society

The Gnostic Society, was founded for the study of Gnosticism in 1928 and incorporated in 1939 by Theosophists James Morgan Pryse and his brother John Pryse in Los Angeles.[24][25] Since 1963 it has been under the direction of Stephan Hoeller and operates in association with the Ecclesia Gnostica. Initially begun as an archive for a usenet newsgroup in 1993, the Gnosis Archive became the first web site to offer historic and source materials on Gnosticism.

Mid-20th century

The Gospel of Thomas, held to be the most complete of the Nag Hammadi texts, is the subject of the book The Mustard Seed by Indian mystic Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, also known as Osho.[26]

Ecclesia Gnostica

Established in 1953 by Richard Duc de Palatine in England under the name 'the Pre-nicene Gnostic Catholic Church', the Ecclesia Gnostica (Latin: "Church of Gnosis" or "Gnostic Church") is said to represent 'the English Gnostic tradition', although it has ties to, and has been influenced by, the French Gnostic church tradition. It is affiliated with the Gnostic Society, an organization dedicated to the study of Gnosticism. The presiding bishop is the Rt. Rev. Stephan A. Hoeller, who has written extensively on Gnosticism.[16][24]

Centered in Los Angeles, the Ecclesia Gnostica has parishes and educational programs of the Gnostic Society spanning the Western US and also in the Kingdom of Norway.[24][25] The lectionary and liturgical calendar of the Ecclesia Gnostica have been widely adopted by subsequent Gnostic churches, as have the liturgical services in use by the church, though in somewhat modified forms.

Ecclesia Gnostica Mysteriorum

The Ecclesia Gnostica Mysteriorum (EGM), commonly known as "the Church of Gnosis" or "the Gnostic Sanctuary," was initially established in Palo Alto by bishop Rosamonde Miller as a parish of the Ecclesia Gnostica, but soon became an independent body with emphasis on the experience of gnosis and the balance of the divine masculine and feminine principles. The Gnostic Sanctuary is now located in Redwood City, California.[24][25] The EGM also claims a distinct lineage of Mary Magdalene from a surviving tradition in France.[27]

Samael Aun Weor in South America

Samael Aun Weor had been a member of an occult order called the Fraternitas Rosicruciana Antiqua, but left after the death of Arnold Krumm-Heller. He reported an experience of being called to his new mission by the venerable White Lodge (associated with Theosophy). Samael Aun Weor taught a "New Gnosis," consisting of sexual union between man and woman, without the ejaculation of the sexual liquid. He called this the Arcanum AZF. For him it is "the synthesis of all religions, schools and sects."[citation needed]

Moving through Latin America, he finally settled in Mexico where he founded the Movimiento Gnostico Cristiano Universal (MGCU) (Universal Gnostic Christian Movement), then subsequently founded the Iglesia Gnostica Cristiana Universal (Universal Gnostic Christian Church) and the Associacion Gnostica de Estudios Antropologicos Culturales y Cientificos (AGEAC) (Gnostic Association of Scientific, Cultural and Anthropological Studies) to spread his teachings.[28]

The MGCU became defunct by the time of Samael Aun Weor's death in December 1977. However, his disciples subsequently formed new organizations to spread his teachings, under the umbrella term 'the International Gnostic Movement'. These organizations are currently very active via the Internet and have centers established in Latin America, the US, Australia, Canada and Europe.[29]

Hans Jonas

The philosopher Hans Jonas wrote extensively on Gnosticism, interpreting it from an existentialist viewpoint.[30] For some time, his study The Gnostic Religion: The message of the alien God and the beginnings of Christianity published in 1958, was widely held to be a pivotal work, and it is as a result of his efforts that the Syrian-Egyptian/Persian division of Gnosticism came to be widely used within the field. The second edition, published in 1963, included the essay "Gnosticism, Existentialism, and Nihilism," where Jonas claimed that attitude previously manifest as ancient Gnosticism was transformed into Nihilism (largely identified as Nazism) by the secular-atheist approach typical of Sartre and Heidegger.[30]

Eric Voegelin's anti-modernist 'gnostic thesis'

In the 1950s, Eric Voegelin brought a German academic debate concerning the classification of modernity to the attention of English-language readers. He responded to Karl Löwith's 1949 Meaning in History: the Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History and Jacob Taubes's 1947 Occidental Eschatology. Voegelin put forward his version of a "gnosticism thesis": criticizing modernity by identifying an "immanentist eschatology" as the "gnostic nature" of modernity. Differing with Löwith, he did not criticize eschatology as such, but rather the immanentization which he described as a "pneumopathological" deformation. Voegelin's gnosticism thesis became popular in American neo-conservative and cold war political thought.[31] The category of gnosticism has been adopted by other scholars to frame several revolutionary phenomena (such as Bolshevism and Nazism, Puritanism, radical Anabaptism, Jacobinism,[32] and lastly Salafi-Jihadism[33]).

Gershom Scholem's Kabbalah as Jewish Gnosticism

Gershom Scholem (5 December 1897 – 21 February 1982), was a German-born Israeli philosopher and historian. Widely regarded as the founder of modern academic study of the Kabbalah, Scholem produced the hypothesis that the source of the 13th century Kabbalah (such as the Zohar) was Jewish gnosticism that preceded Christian gnosticism. For example, in the title of his 1960's Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah Mysticism, and the Talmudic Tradition.

Late-20th century and 21st century

Neo-Gnostic movement in Finland

Pekka Siitoin founded the Turku Society for the Spiritual Sciences (Turun Hengentieteen Seura) on September 1, 1971. Siitoin believed in neo-Gnosticism and Theosophy and combined these with antisemitism and satanism. To him, Lucifer, Satan and Jesus were subordinate to the Monad, and could be worshiped together. Lucifer was a Promethean figure who created the original humanity and granted them wisdom so that they would evolve to be equal to Gods in time, while Jehova-Demiurge created the Jewish race to usurp Lucifer's power and lord over humanity. Siitoin was also influenced by Christian apocrypha, like Gospel of Judas and to him Jesus was an agent of the Monad and Lucifer against the Demiurge.[34][35][36][37] Several of the perpetrators of the Kursiivi printing house arson in November 1977 were members of the society.[38]

The neo-Nazis arrested in the 2021 Kankaanpää terrorism arrests were also inspired by the neo-Gnostic movement and had built a shrine with gnostic symbols and literature.[39]

Dilexit nos

Pope Francis suggests that a modern form of Jansenist rigour which he has criticised in his encyclical letter Dilexit nos can be seen as "a recrudescence of that Gnosticism which proved so great a spiritual threat in the early centuries of Christianity because it refused to acknowledge the reality of 'the salvation of the flesh'." The aim of his letter, which focuses on "the heart of Jesus Christ", is to avoid the danger of withdrawal to a "disambodied spirituality" which treats matter as evil.[40]

Gnosticism has seen something of a resurgence in popular culture in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. This may be related, certainly, to the sudden availability of Gnostic texts to the reading public, following the emergence of the Nag Hammadi library.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Taussig 2013, p. 532.
  2. ^ 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
  3. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) p. 8-9
  4. ^ Hoeller (2002) p. 167
  5. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) p. 8
  6. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) pp. 56–57
  7. ^ Hoeller (2002) p. 170
  8. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) pp. 31–32
  9. Jump up to:a b c Pearson, J. (2007) p. 47
  10. Jump up to:a b Hoeller (2002) p. 176-8
  11. ^ Segal (1995) p. 26
  12. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) p. 1, 30-1
  13. ^ Goodrick-Clarke (2005) p. 30
  14. ^ Jung (1977) p. 652
  15. ^ Segal (1995) p. 30
  16. Jump up to:a b Goodrick-Clarke (2005) p. 31
  17. ^ Hoeller (1989) p. 7
  18. ^ Jung (1977) p. 671
  19. ^ Pearson, J. (2007) p. 131
  20. ^ Urban (2006) p. 36 note 68
  21. ^ Urban (2006) p. 36
  22. ^ Greer (2003) p. 221-2
  23. ^ The Equinox III:1 (1929) p. 247
  24. Jump up to:a b c d Pearson, B. (2007) p. 240
  25. Jump up to:a b c Smith (1995) p. 206
  26. ^ Osho (1974). The Mustard Seed – Commentaries on the Fifth Gospel of Saint Thomas. Switzerland: OSHO International Foundation.
  27. ^ Keizer 2000, p. 48.
  28. ^ Dawson (2007) p. 54-60
  29. ^ Dawson (2007) p. 60-65
  30. Jump up to:a b Sariel 2023, pp. 91–122.
  31. ^ Weiss (2000)
  32. ^ Pellicani (2003)
  33. ^ Arrigo (2021)
  34. ^ Western Esotericism in Scandinavia, 2016, p. 326-328. Edited by Henrik Bogdan and Olav Hammer.
  35. ^ Granholm, Kennet. “‘Worshipping the Devil in the Name of God’: Anti-Semitism, Teosophy and Christianity in the Occult Doctrines of Pekka Siitoin”, Journal for the Academic Study of Magic, no. 5 (2009): 256–286.
  36. ^ Pasanen, T. (2021). Christus verus Luciferus, Demon est Deus Inversus: Pekka Siitoin’s Spiritism Board. Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 57(2), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.107763
  37. ^ Keronen, Jiri: Pekka Siitoin teoriassa ja käytännössä. Helsinki: Kiuas Kustannus, 2020. ISBN 978-952-7197-21-9
  38. ^ "Pekka Siitoin Was the New Face of Neo-Fascism in Finland [in Finnish]"Finnish Broadcasting Company. 4 May 2015. Archived from the original on 6 May 2015. Retrieved 24 July 2017.
  39. ^ "Terrorismirikoksista syytetyt kertovat, miten nimien julkitulo vaikutti työpaikkojen menettämiseen – varat jäädytettiin ja talo meni asumiskelvottomaksi"Kankaanpään Seutu. 5 December 2024.
  40. ^ Flader, J., Q&A with Fr Flader: The Sacred Heart, Jansenism and GnosticismThe Catholic Weekly, published on 13 November 2024, accessed on 10 January 2025
  41. ^ "Granica, która oddziela od światła. Obraz(y) czasu w twórczości Olgi Tokarczuk - Krzysztof Brenskott | Nowy Napis"nowynapis.eu (in Polish). 2019-10-10. Retrieved 2021-10-08.
  42. ^ Daugherty, Leo. "Gravers False and True: Blood Meridian as Gnostic Tragedy," Southern Quarterly, 30, No. 4, Summer 1992, pp. 122–133.
  43. ^ Owens, Barcley. Cormac McCarthy's Western Novels. University of Arizona Press, 2000. ISBN 0-8165-1928-5.
  44. ^ "Behind the Classics: Amy Hennig Talks Soul Reaver Secrets"blog.playstation.com. Retrieved 2023-01-17.
  45. ^ Lynskey, Dorian (6 November 2014). "Psycho lizards from Saturn: The godlike genius of David Icke!"NewStatesman. Retrieved 2021-08-17.
  46. ^ Aguilar, Father Alfonso (6–12 April 2003). "Gnosticism and the Struggle for the World's Soul"Catholic Education Resource Center. Archived from the original on 6 November 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  47. ^ Flannery-Dailey, Frances, and Rachel Wagner. "Wake up! Gnosticism and Buddhism in the Matrix." Journal of Religion and Film 5.2 (2001).

References

  • Arrigo, Giacomo Maria (2021). Gnostic Jihadism. A Philosophical Inquiry into Radical Politics. Milan: Mimesis International. ISBN 978-8-86977-304-4.
  • Crowley, Aleister (2007). The Equinox vol. III no. 1. San Francisco: Weiser. ISBN 978-1-57863-353-1.
  • Dawson, Andrew (2007). New era, new religions: religious transformation in contemporary Brazil. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-5433-9.
  • Goodrick-Clarke, Clare (2005). G. R. S. Mead and the Gnostic Quest. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books. ISBN 1-55643-572-X.
  • Greer, John Michael (2003). The New Encyclopedia of the Occult. St. Paul: Llewellyn. ISBN 1-56718-336-0.
  • Hoeller, Stephan (1989). The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead. Quest Books. ISBN 0-8356-0568-X.
  • Hoeller, StephanGnosticism: New light on the ancient tradition of inner knowing. Quest Books.
  • Jonas, Hans (1966). “Gnosticism, Existentialism, and Nihilism.” In The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, University of Chicago Press.
  • Jung, Carl Gustav (1977). The Collected Works of C.G. Jung. Princeton, NJ: Bollingen (Princeton University). ISBN 0-7100-8291-6.
  • Keizer, Lewis (2000). The Wandering Bishops: Apostles of a New Spirituality (PDF). St. Thomas Press.
  • Lasch, Christopher. "Gnosticism, Ancient and Modern: The Religion of the Future?," Salmagundi, No. 96, Fall 1992.
  • Mead, GRS (1906). Fragments of a Faith Forgotten (2nd ed.). Theosophical Society.
  • O’Reagan, Cyril (2001). Gnostic Return in Modernity, SUNY Press.
  • Pearson, Birger (2007). Ancient Gnosticism: Traditions and Literature. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. ISBN 978-0-8006-3258-8.
  • Pearson, Joanne (2007). Wicca and the Christian Heritage. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-25414-4.
  • Pellicani, Luciano (2003). Revolutionary Apocalypse. Ideological Roots of Terrorism. Westport: Praeger. ISBN 0-275-98145-2.
  • Rossbach, Stefan (2000). Gnostic Wars, Edinburgh University Press.
  • Sariel, Aviram (2023). "Jonasian Gnosticism". Harvard Theological Review116 (1): 91–122.
  • Segal, Robert (1995). "Jung's Fascination with Gnosticism". In Segal, Robert (ed.). The Allure of Gnosticism: the Gnostic experience in Jungian psychology and contemporary culture. Open Court. pp. 26–38. ISBN 0-8126-9278-0.
  • Smith, Richard (1995). "The revival of ancient Gnosis". In Segal, Robert (ed.). The Allure of Gnosticism: the Gnostic experience in Jungian psychology and contemporary culture. Open Court. p. 206. ISBN 0-8126-9278-0.
  • Urban, Hugh B. (2006). Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in modern Western esotericism. University of California. ISBN 0-520-24776-0.
  • Taussig, Hal (2013). A New New Testament: A Reinvented Bible for the Twenty-first Century Combining Traditional and Newly Discovered Texts. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 9780547792101.
  • Versluis, Arthur (2006). "Eric Voegelin, Anti-Gnosticism, and the Totalitarian Emphasis on Order." In The New Inquisitions: Heretic-Hunting and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Totalitarianism, Oxford University Press.
  • Voegelin, Eric (1956). Order and History, Louisiana State University Press.
  • Voegelin, Eric (1968). Science, Politics, and Gnosticism: Two Essays, Regnery Gateway.
  • Voegelin, Eric (1987). The New Science of Politics, University Of Chicago Press.
  • Weiss, Gilbert (2000). "Between gnosis and anamnesis--European perspectives on Eric Voegelin". The Review of Politics62 (4): 753–776. doi:10.1017/S003467050004273XS2CID 144643743. 65964268.
  • Wasserstrom, Steven M. (1999). Religion after religion: Gershom Scholem, Mircea Eliade, and Henry Corbin at Eranos. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. ISBN 0-691-00540-0.

Further reading

  • Styfhals, Willem (2019). No Spiritual Investment in the World: Gnosticism and Postwar German Philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-3099-3.