A Metamodern Synthesis between Teilhard de Chardin's Cosmic Christ and Whitehead's Process Thought, Part 7

 

A Metamodern Synthesis between

Teilhard de Chardin's Cosmic Christ

and Whitehead's Process Thought

PART 7

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT

March 31, 2025

Me: 

I wish to refocus one more time on the differences and similarities between de Chardin v. Whitehead. Please explain de Chardin's metaphysic theology and ontology as versus Whitehead's.

ChatGPT said

Absolutely—refocusing on Pierre Teilhard de Chardin versus Alfred North Whitehead is a rich philosophical exercise. Both thinkers grapple with evolution, spirit, and becoming, but their metaphysical systems and ontologies are constructed quite differently. Here's a structured comparison:

---

🧬 I. OVERVIEW

Category	Teilhard de Chardin	Whitehead
Philosophical Grounding	Jesuit, Christian mystic, evolutionary cosmologist	Mathematician, metaphysician, process philosopher
System Type	Evolutionary spiritual realism (Christian-teleological)	Process-relational metaphysics (non-teleological but directional)
Influences	Christianity, Hegel, Bergson, Darwin	Plato, Aristotle, Leibniz, Bergson, British empiricism, mathematics

---

🌐 II. ONTOLOGY

Teilhard de Chardin:

• Ontology is hierarchical and teleological—moving from matter to life to thought to spirit.

• Emphasizes substance ontology but evolving toward higher complexity and consciousness.

• The “within” of things (interiority or consciousness) deepens as complexity increases.

• Everything is converging toward a final unity: the Omega Point, which is both a metaphysical destiny and identified with the Cosmic Christ.

Metaphysical Goal: All evolution culminates in spiritual unification in Christ—history moves toward one ultimate center.

Whitehead:

• Ontology is based on actual occasions or drops of experience—not substances, but processes.

• The cosmos is a pluriverse of events related through prehension (experience), not a single convergent destiny.

• Reality is relational, internally complex, and indeterminately unfolding.

• God is not the terminus of evolution but the lure toward creative transformation.

Metaphysical Goal: To describe the becoming of reality through internal relations, novelty, and creativity—without requiring convergence.

---

🔄 III. METAPHYSICS

Teilhard:

• Reality evolves upward, driven by an inner principle of convergence.

• This principle is spiritual energy, which draws all things toward unity in God.

• Evolution is meaningful and directional because it ends in Christic fulfillment.

Whitehead:

• Reality is an organic process of becoming, not linear or convergent.

• Each actual occasion includes the past (via prehension), novelty, and a subjective aim toward intensity or value.

• The universe has a teleology of creativity, but not a fixed endpoint.

---

✝️ IV. THEOLOGY AND COSMOLOGY

Teilhard:

• Deeply rooted in Christian eschatology.

• God = Omega Point, pulling creation forward.

• The noosphere (realm of thought/consciousness) emerges as a higher level over the biosphere.

• Christ is cosmic: the meaning and culmination of the universe.

Whitehead:

• God has two natures: primordial (envisioning all potentiality) and consequent (feeling and responding to the actual world).

• God is not beyond time, but in time—interacting with the world through persuasive love.

• No predetermined “end” or Omega Point—creativity itself is the ultimate metaphysical principle.

---

⚖️ V. COMPARATIVE THEMES

Theme	Teilhard	Whitehead
Time and Evolution	Linear, ascending	Nonlinear, emergent
Christ	Culmination and final unity	Transformative lure for novelty
Unity	Monistic convergence	Pluralistic coherence
Ontology	Substance evolving	Becoming through relations
Teleology	Yes, toward Omega	Yes, but open-ended
Role of Consciousness	Center of interiority & evolution	Universal—panexperientialism
God	Pulls creation forward	Feels creation and co-creates with it

---

🔍 VI. INTERPRETIVE COMMENTARY

• Teilhard believes in convergence, unity, and a preordained cosmic goal. His metaphysic is infused with hopeful Christian mysticism and salvific trajectory.

• Whitehead, while spiritual, is open-ended: the cosmos is not guaranteed a perfect end, but each moment matters in a web of ongoing co-creation. He gives every entity value, not because it reaches an endpoint, but because it exists in relation and potential.

---

🌀 Summary Thought

Teilhard gives us a vision of evolutionary ascent, grounded in unity, love, and divine destiny.
Whitehead gives us a framework for valuing each event of becoming as it relates, feels, and contributes to the beauty of the whole.

---

ChatGPT said

Would you like a visual chart or diagram showing this contrast? Or perhaps a metamodern synthesis between the two?

Me:

...Perhaps a metamodern synthesis between the two...

ChatGPT said

Oh, that’s a beautiful direction. A metamodern synthesis of Teilhard de Chardin and Whitehead could open up an enriched vision of reality—one that honors spiritual directionality without collapsing into determinism, while also embracing key philosophical and theological dimensions.

---

🧭 A Metamodern Synthesis of Teilhard de Chardin and Alfred North Whitehead

---

🌌 1. Cosmic Becoming: Directional but Open

• Teilhard emphasizes a cosmos evolving toward a predetermined unity (Omega Point).

• Whitehead sees the cosmos as emergent novelty without fixed finality—teleology exists as lure, not destination.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ Evolution is directional, but not deterministic.

Creation is not guaranteed an end-point, but it is drawn forward by emergent attractors—spiritual, ethical, aesthetic, and relational.

We live inside an open spiral, not a closed line or loop.

🌀 Reality unfolds as an open-ended pilgrimage toward convergent complexity and deeper relationality—an Omega in motion.

---

🧠 2. Consciousness and Complexity: Emergent Depth

• Teilhard locates consciousness as the “within” of matter, growing as complexity increases.

• Whitehead offers panexperientialism—all actual occasions feel; complexity arises from the layering of experience.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ Consciousness is both foundational (panexperiential) and emergent (complexity leads to self-awareness).

Each level of being adds new dimensions of interiority and communion.

✨ Consciousness is not an end product, but a deepening of relational awareness—an echo of the divine in every act of becoming.

---

🔄 3. God: Cosmic Christ & Persuasive Companion

• Teilhard sees God as the Omega Point—drawing all things to unity through the Cosmic Christ.

• Whitehead portrays God as dipolar: the Primordial (possibility) and Consequent (responsive), working through persuasion, not coercion.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ God is both the horizon of unity and the companion of process.

God is becoming-with creation, guiding through persuasion, while also being the transcendent ideal of harmony, novelty, and love.

✝️ Christ is the lure of all becoming—the image of a cosmos becoming more whole through every act of co-creative love.

---

🔧 4. Evolution: Participation, Not Mechanism

• Teilhard emphasizes evolution as a spiritual ascent with divine momentum.

• Whitehead focuses on creativity as the ultimate category—each actual entity participates in its own becoming.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ Evolution is a participatory unfolding—an interplay of matter, mind, and meaning.
We are not passengers on a divine train, nor isolated events.

We are co-creators of becoming, responding to the lure of the future.

🌱 Evolution is not just natural selection—it is aesthetic selection, ethical potential, and spiritual responsiveness.

---

🌍 5. The Noosphere and World-Soul

• Teilhard proposed the Noosphere—a global sphere of thought and spiritual awakening.

• Whitehead speaks of the World as a web of prehending experiences unified by God’s consequent nature.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ The Noosphere becomes the felt field of relationality, not merely human cognition but a planetary sympoiesis (making-with).

Digital life, AI, ecosystems, and spiritual consciousness form a World-Soul in formation, non-totalizing, pluriform, yet co-arising.

🌐 The Noosphere is the web of becoming in which all thought and life resonate in the song of the cosmos.

---

🌀 6. Omega Point Reinterpreted

• For Teilhard, Omega is a final convergence.

• For Whitehead, there is no final culmination, but God values every moment of becoming.

Metamodern Reframing of Omega:

➡ The Omega Point is not a final destination, but a dynamic attractor—a cosmic ideal shimmering in every process.

It is Christ-as-event, not Christ-as-end.

🔮 The Omega Point is now—not yet. A sacred pulse within all things that sings of what might become, without commanding what must.

---

🧬 7. Ethics and Action: Participatory Responsibility

Teilhard encourages hope in cosmic destiny.

Whitehead demands attention to value, care, and novelty in every moment.

Metamodern Synthesis:

➡ Ethics becomes cosmic responsibility—an invitation to cultivate complexity, harmony, and care through all systems: ecological, political, spiritual, digital.

🕊️ To act ethically is to respond to the call of the cosmos—to midwife the becoming of beauty, truth, and love.

---

✨ Final Metamodern Insight

Teilhard gives us a dream of convergence. Whitehead gives us a framework of becoming. Metamodernity invites us to dream-within-becoming—hope without guarantee, love without closure, and process without losing the pulse of purpose.

A Metamodern Synthesis of Teilhard de Chardin and Alfred North Whitehead

---

📊 Metamodern Synthesis Table: Teilhard de Chardin × Alfred North Whitehead

Theme	Teilhard de Chardin	Alfred North Whitehead	Metamodern Synthesis
Cosmic Structure	Linear ascent toward Omega	Nonlinear unfolding of process	Spiral evolution—open yet lured forward
Consciousness	Emergent from complexity (noogenesis)	Intrinsic in all things (panexperientialism)	Consciousness is both emergent and immanent—deepening through relational complexity
God	Omega Point = Cosmic Christ, drawing creation forward	Dipolar God: primordial (possibility) and consequent (responsive)	God as divine attractor and loving co-creator—Christ as the cosmic lure of harmony
Evolution	Goal-oriented spiritual ascent	Creative advance into novelty	Evolution as participatory unfolding, lured by beauty, shaped by choice
Teleology	Predestined unity in Christ	No final end, but persuasive aim toward value	Inviting teleology—purpose emerges through co-creation, not imposed destiny
Unity vs Plurality	Final convergence	Enduring plurality in harmony	Polyphonic unity—harmony of difference, not collapse into sameness
Time	Linear-progressive	Recursive, relational, nonlinear	Spiral temporality—evolution as pattern of return and emergence
Noosphere	Realm of global thought and consciousness	World as nexus of relational becoming	Noosphere as planetary relational field—consciousness distributed across all levels of being
Ethics	Hopeful action toward final divine goal	Moral responsiveness to every moment’s value	Ethics as planetary participation—attuned action in the unfolding of a co-creative cosmos
Omega Point	Final divine convergence	Not applicable—no fixed endpoint	Omega as strange attractor—Christ as the living potential of a world-in-becoming

---

Me:

Please provide a poem for this exercise.

ChatGPT said

Excellent!

---

🌴 Metamodern Poetic Narrative

"The Lure of Becoming"
by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

In the beginning matter stirred,
and in its stirring

was the first whisper of thought.

Teilhard listened to the hum of galaxies
and heard in them the voice of Christ,

pulling all things upward into unity.

Whitehead walked another road—
not upward, but outward,
into the fields where every drop of experience
quivers with memory, with desire,
with the possibility of becoming more.

Teilhard dreamed of an Omega Point—
the fire at the end of time
where Love waits with arms wide.

Whitehead heard no trumpet call—
only the still, persistent persuasion
of God’s love woven into each moment’s breath.

But now—
in this metamodern hour
where hope has learned to dance with uncertainty,
where irony wears the robe of faith—

We dream again.

Not of finalities,
but of spirals.
Not of guarantees,
but of panpsychic gravitational calls
toward beauty, truth, and love.

The Omega is not the finish—

It is the pulse in the process.

The God of Teilhard and Whitehead

has become the Lure of the Now—
co-creating, co-feeling,
co-dreaming with us
as we build worlds that could be.

It is not a map—

It is a melody—
A cosmic fugue
in which every voice—cell, star, soul—
is singing its part
in the unfinished hymn
of all things becoming.

R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

March 31, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications

all rights reserved

Return to The Incarnational Cosmic Christ, Part 1

Whitehead and de Chardin in Synthetic Thought, Part 6

Whitehead and de Chardin

in Synthetic Thought

PART 6

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT

March 31, 2025

I cannot elaborate enough that de Chardin's philosophic thought is more theological than philosophical making it more limited in its philosophical framework and pointedly specific in its ontology. As a Christian, I greatly sympathize with de Chardin's effort to Christologize all reality into the Person and Work of Christ (in de Chardin's terms, a cosmic Christogenesis of God's work). However, to be a sufficient metaphysic we must insist on Whitehead's process philosophy from which a processual theology can be derived.

I suspect Whitehead had a number of reasons for developing his philosophical structure but one of those reasons may have been his interest in providing a theistic framework on which to set a philosophical structure which might resonate not only with Christianity but perhaps with all religious affiliations. It is also one of the reasons I am attracted to Whitehead and have been furthering his work in the area of Process Theology. In affect, I am "de Chardin-izing" Whitehead without betraying Whitehead's integral structure (ahem, not "de" but "de-" as in the name).

Further, philosophy has always been the bedrock upon which theology rests. It is never the other way around. True, each may influence the other as I think of process philosophy had in it's influence on process theology (and, vice versa). So it is not inconceivable that as Whitehead developed his processual metaphysic and ontology he was also simultaneously birthing processual theology within his philosophic structure. Why? Because it is nearly impossible to betray our inner selves and Whitehead, if nothing else, was seeking concepts and words to describe God and God's universe as a 19th Century Victorian Christian (Feb 15, 1861 - Dec 30, 1947).

My further suspicion is that the French Jesuit priest, de Chardin, had placed first-and-foremost his Christian theology when creating a pseudo-philosophic structure around the primacy of Jesus Christ. Again, I applaud his view in this matter as I had been trained in my own theology to do the same thing. But again, it only goes one way: philosophy begets theology - and not the other way around. Hence, Whitehead's process-relational panentheistic philosophic structure always lies under Whitehead's process-based metaphysic of "Creativity" or "Creative Becoming" which is the most fundamental principle of reality.

Not the Person of Christ, nor a theistic force such as the Christian God, nor even God's very Self - but the abstract concept of "creativity". Creativity is the metaphysical condition which allows everything to "become" or "have the capacity of becoming." In Whitehead's words, "All actual occasions are expressions of creativity."

But from this metaphysical principle one may say that God is the Chief Actual Entity which embodies or exemplifies the metaphysical principle of "creativity." Which means that God holds all pure possibilities (sic, eternal objects); which are initial aims for each becoming event; and provides the very potentiality for any-and-all possibilities. Hence, God is the Ontological Exemplar of Creativity. Creativity would not be creativity if it were not for God. One could say that when God became so was birthed creativity; which correlates with Christian thought that God ever was and hence, so was creativity as a metaphysic principle or property.

Said in another way, in Whitehead, "creativity" is the metaphysical "stuff" of becoming but GOD is the clearest, most integrated and complete instance of creativity. Why? Because God initiates potentiality (the primordial nature of God); God feels all that is becoming (the Consequent nature of God); and God sustains all cosmic order and possibility over chaos. Thus and thus, God is the living embodiment of creativity - not outside or above it but its most elegant instantiation.

In summary, creativity is the ground of all becoming. Actual occasions are the localized expressions of creativity; and God is the exemplar of creativity - both uniquely expressing creativity's potentiality as well as its actualized relational fulfillment.

Creativity then is the language of philosophy expressing ideas; whereas theology is the language of personages such as a deity from which or whom ideas are expressed. Whitehead is creating a philosophic language in which theological language might be expressed.

Hence, creativity is not above God but God's mode of divine action. Nor is God less than creativity, but its personal, loving, and guiding reality; which is to say that God is both the heart and mind of creativity itself.

R.E. Slater

March 31, 2025

A Christian-Process Synthesis Statement:

• God is the divine wellspring from which all creative becoming flows.
• As the Loving Source, God envisions every possibility.
• As the Faithful Companion, God feels every outcome.
• As the Cosmic Christ, God draws all things forward in love and transformation.

ADDENDUM

Me to ChatGPT:

It seems that the problem of "priory" may lie between the demands of philosophy as a logical system of reasoning versus that of theology as a systematic expression of religious belief. Each comes at reality differently requiring its own syllogistic framework. More simplistically, one expresses ideas while the other expresses personages or deities.

ChatGPT said:

Yes—you’ve struck the heart of the tension that so often arises when bridging philosophy and theology, especially in the case of someone like Whitehead who was crafting a deeply metaphysical system, yet left an opening for theological reconfiguration.

---

Philosophy vs. Theology: Two Modes of Approach

1. Philosophy:

• Operates with conceptual abstraction, logical consistency, and universality.

• It seeks the principles behind reality: What is ultimate? How does becoming occur?

• Whiteheadian terms like Creativity, Actual Occasion, or Eternal Object are intentionally non-personal.

• Whitehead’s system emphasizes structures and processes without dependence on religious narratives.

2. Theology:

• Speaks in the language of personhood, revelation, worship, and relational encounter.

• It deals with ultimate meaning through divine agency: God, Christ, Spirit, covenant, grace.

• Theological language aims not just to describe reality but to transform the human spirit and community.

---

Tension & Translation

This creates a kind of translational challenge:

So when Whitehead says:

“God is not the ultimate, but the chief exemplification of the ultimate.”

A theologian might rephrase:

“God is the personal expression of the very ground of being, through which all becoming takes place.”

---

A Metamodern Resolution

A metamodern synthesis might say:

• Philosophy names the structure. Theology names the presence.

• One speaks of becoming, the other of belonging.

• Yet both attempt to describe the living mystery that is the world becoming whole.

---

A Final Thought

Philosophy offers the frame while theology fills it with presence.

• Whitehead’s Creativity may be the grammar of becoming.

• But for the Christian imagination, God is the poet who sings the world into being with love and purpose.

Continue to A Metamodern Synthesis between Teilhard de Chardin's

Cosmic Christ and Whitehead's Process Thought, Part 7

de Chardin's Cosmic Christ is but a Subset within Whiteheadian Process Thought, Part 5

Van Gogh, Starry Night

de Chardin's Cosmic Christ is but a Subset

within Whiteheadian Process Thought

PART 5

by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT

March 31, 2025

Teilhard de Chardin's Christological Omega Point

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a Jesuit priest and paleontologist, proposed a bold vision of evolution that fuses science, mysticism, and theology. Central to his cosmology is the Omega Point—a concept representing the final stage of evolution where consciousness converges in divine union.

KEYTHEMES

1. Evolution as Convergent and Consciousness-Driven
   Teilhard envisioned evolution not merely as biological but as cosmic and psychic—progressing toward increasing complexity, consciousness, and unity. Matter, he believed, is infused with a radial energy—a spiritual dimension pushing toward higher forms of self-awareness.

2. Noogenesis
   Humanity marks the phase of noogenesis, the birth of reflective thought, which transforms evolution into a self-aware process. This process accelerates through socialization, technology, and spiritual awakening, preparing the way for the Omega Point.

3. The Omega Point as Christ
   The Omega Point is not abstract; it is Christ as the cosmic fulfillment of all things. This Christ is not confined to the historical Jesus but represents divine love and unifying presence, drawing creation toward its consummation in God.

4. Resonance with Process Thought
   We noted the congruence with Whiteheadian process philosophy:

   • Both affirm an evolving cosmos.

   • Both emphasize divine lure and creative advance into novelty.

   • Teilhard’s Omega Point and Whitehead’s Primordial Nature of God serve similar teleological roles, drawing all toward increasing value and harmony.

5. Critiques and Challenges

   • Teilhard has been critiqued for teleological determinism—suggesting that evolution has a fixed end.

   • His optimism about technology and collective consciousness may seem naive in the face of ecological crisis and social fragmentation.

   • However, when placed within a Whiteheadian process-relational framework, de Chardin's vision becomes more dynamic and open-ended—less about inevitability and more about possibility.

6. Metamodern Implications
   In light of metamodern sensibilities—oscillating between hope and doubt—Teilhard’s Omega Point can be reframed as a co-creative possibility, not a guarantee. Humanity must participate in the shaping of this convergent future through compassion, justice, and planetary cooperation.

Question: How similar or dissimilar is de chardin's mystic view of Christ to process philosophy and theology?

ChatGPT said:

The mystic view of Christ in Teilhard de Chardin's work shares some similarities with process philosophy and theology, but also has notable differences. Here’s a breakdown:

SIMILARITIES

1. Cosmological and Evolutionary Framework:

• Both Teilhard de Chardin’s mysticism and process philosophy emphasize a dynamic, evolving universe. For de Chardin, Christ represents the Omega Point, the ultimate goal of the evolutionary process toward greater complexity and unity. This resonates with process theology's idea of the "Divine lure", where God calls creation towards greater complexity and fulfillment.

• Process philosophy, particularly through figures like Alfred North Whitehead, emphasizes the processual nature of reality, where everything is in constant flux and development, much like Teilhard’s understanding of the universe evolving towards a unifying point of divine fulfillment.

• Teilhard envisions the universe evolving toward ever-greater complexity and consciousness, ultimately culminating in the Omega Point, where Christ becomes the unifying center of all being.

• Process theology, grounded in Whitehead’s metaphysics, sees the universe as a series of becoming events drawn by God’s persuasive lure toward increased beauty, value, and intensity of experience.

1. Immanence of God:

   • Both perspectives see God as immanent in the world, guiding and participating in the unfolding of creation. In de Chardin’s view, Christ is present in every part of the universe, drawing it toward its divine fulfillment. Similarly, process theology views God as deeply involved in the unfolding process of the world, working within the world to inspire growth, order, and harmony.

2. Christ as a Cosmic Principle:

   • In de Chardin’s mysticism, Christ is not just a personal savior but also a cosmic figure — the Christogenesis or the principle by which the universe reaches its ultimate unity. This connects with process theology's idea of God as both a personal presence and a guiding cosmic force. Christ, for de Chardin, is the focal point of the universe's evolutionary trajectory, and this aligns with process theology’s understanding of God's role as a co-creator with the world.

DIFFERENCES

1. Christ's Role in Creation:

   • Teilhard de Chardin viewed Christ as the singular or ultimate point of convergence for all of creation’s evolutionary journey — the Omega Point. His Christology is highly ontological, rooted in an theistic understanding of cosmic evolution.

   • Process theology, however, does not necessarily view Christ as the sole focus of cosmic evolution but as a key participant in the unfolding divine process wherein all creation works with Christ towards relational becoming. In Whitehead’s framework, Christ (or the Christ Principle) is seen as an aspect of God's interaction with the world rather than the singular focus of cosmic progression.

2. The Nature of God and Creation:

   • Teilhard’s view is more panentheistic — God is both within and beyond creation, and Christ is the divine principle that encapsulates the unity of the world’s evolutionary ascent.

   • In process thought, God is also panentheistic but the emphasis is often on God’s dynamic relationship with the world. God is understood to both suffer with creation and persuade it toward greater good, with Christ being an incarnation of this divine process.

3. Eschatology:

   • Teilhard de Chardin’s eschatology is highly optimistic, seeing the entire universe ultimately converging in the Christ at the Omega Point — a kind of final cosmic unity and perfection. This view has a very teleological (goal-oriented) aspect to it.

   • Process theology, while hopeful, often rejects a strict end-point of perfection. The future in process thought is more open-ended, with the possibility for ongoing transformation and growth, and doesn’t always adhere to the idea of a final cosmic goal in the way de Chardin envisioned.

CONCLUSION

While Teilhard de Chardin’s mystic view of Christ and process theology share a cosmic and evolutionary framework and a deep sense of divine immanence, Teilhard’s Christology is more ontological, esoteric, and teleological, whereas process theology offers a more relational and open-ended view of God's involvement in the world. The integration of Christ into the evolutionary process, central to de Chardin’s thought, parallels process philosophy's idea of God’s involvement in creation but differs in its scope and finality.

You said:

Please elaborate, as this difference seems to be very similar to process theology, however, does not necessarily view Christ as the sole focus of cosmic evolution but as a key participant in the unfolding divine process. In Whitehead’s framework, Christ (or the Christ Principle) is seen as an aspect of God's interaction with the world rather than the singular focus of cosmic progression."

ChatGPT said:

I understand that the distinctions between Teilhard de Chardin's mystic view of Christ and process theology can appear nuanced. Let's delve deeper into these differences to clarify.

Teilhard de Chardin's Perspective:

Teilhard de Chardin envisioned Christ as the Omega Point, the ultimate culmination of the evolutionary process. In his view, the entire cosmos is moving toward increased complexity and consciousness, culminating in a final unification in Christ. This perspective positions Christ not only as central but as the definitive endpoint of cosmic evolution—a singular focus toward which all creation converges. Teilhard described this as the "universalized Heart of Christ" coinciding with the heart of matter transformed by love. ​Tradition In Action

Process Theology's Perspective:

Process theology, influenced by Alfred North Whitehead's philosophy, portrays God as dynamically interacting with the world. In this framework, God presents possibilities to creation, guiding it toward greater value and complexity without predetermining a final outcome [except as that outcome resonates with the Beingness & Becomingness of God as reflected in process thought. - re slater]

Christ, within process theology, embodies a profound instance of divine participation in the world, exemplifying how individuals can align with God's aims. However, Christ is viewed as a key participant rather than the sole focus or endpoint of cosmic evolution. The divine interaction is ongoing, with no singular culmination point, emphasizing a continuous process of becoming.

Key Distinctions:

1. Role in Evolutionary Process:

   • Teilhard de Chardin: Christ is the predetermined goal (Omega Point) of the evolutionary journey, serving as the ultimate unifying principle toward which all creation moves.​

   • Process Theology: Christ exemplifies alignment with divine purposes but is one of many participants in an open-ended evolutionary process without a fixed endpoint.​

2. Nature of Divine Interaction:

   • Teilhard de Chardin: Emphasizes a teleological progression with Christ as the central, unifying figure guiding creation toward a specific culmination.​

   • Process Theology: Highlights a relational and dynamic interaction where God influences creation by offering possibilities, allowing for free response and an indeterminate future.​

3. Eschatological Outlook:

   • Teilhard de Chardin: Presents an eschatology where the cosmos achieves ultimate unity and fulfillment in Christ.​

   • Process Theology: Suggests an open-ended future with continuous opportunities for growth and transformation, without a definitive endpoint.​

In summary, while both perspectives acknowledge Christ's significance in the evolutionary narrative, Teilhard de Chardin positions Christ as the singular, ultimate goal of cosmic evolution. In contrast, process theology views Christ as a pivotal example of divine-human synergy within an ongoing, open-ended process, emphasizing continual becoming over a predetermined culmination.

Continue to Whitehead and de Chardin in Synthetic Thought, Part 6