Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Monday, February 24, 2025

Changes Across the History of Judaism from it's Origins to the PostExilic Era




Changes Across the History of Judaism from it's Origins to the PostExilic Era

My last post reviewed Israel's ancient priesthood from a biblical perspective, including to it's comparison to Christ's priesthood. Here, I would like to think through in historical-critical terms how ancient Israel's priesthood's job function and theology change era by era. Over the next several posts I will also do the same with the church's patristic eras thus charting how older narratives and beliefs affected future narratives and beliefs for the better or the worse.

Historical-critical scholarship reveals that ancient Israel’s priesthood evolved significantly over time - along with its national theology shifting in response to a changing social, political, and religious contexts. Here’s an overview of these transformations by historical era:


I - Ancient to Post-Exilic Judaism

1. The Patriarchal Era

Mythic Foundations:

  • Ambiguous Archetypes: In early narratives, priestly functions appear in mythic, non-institutional forms. The figure of Melchizedek—who appears in Genesis as a priest-king—embodies a mysterious, timeless priesthood.
  • Non-Hereditary Model: Unlike later, codified roles, this early priesthood is not based on genealogy but on an enigmatic, eternal authority that echoes broader ancient Near Eastern traditions of warrior or divine kingship.
  • Symbolic Function: The mythic theology here emphasizes an innate, almost cosmic mediation between the divine and human realms, setting a pattern that later traditions would reinterpret.

2. The Exodus and Wilderness Period

Codification of Ritual and Authority:

  • Institutional Establishment: With the Exodus narrative, a formal priesthood emerges. The appointment of Aaron and his descendants marks the beginning of a hereditary priestly class tasked with executing detailed ritual laws.
  • Priestly Source Influence: Historical-critical scholars note that many of the texts detailing tabernacle worship, sacrificial rites, and purity laws are associated with the Priestly (P) source. This source appears to have constructed an idealized system of worship meant to unify the community through centralized rituals.
  • Theological Shift: The emphasis moves from an ambiguous, mythic model to a regulated system where the priesthood not only mediates between God and Israel but also reinforces communal identity and legal order.

3. The Conquest and Judges Period

Diverse and Decentralized Practices:

  • Fragmented Worship: As Israel settles in Canaan, religious practice becomes more diverse. Local altars and shrines proliferate alongside the emerging centralized priestly practices, suggesting a period of religious experimentation and contestation.
  • Tensions and Transitions: During this era, charismatic figures and prophets sometimes challenge the formal priestly establishment, reflecting tensions between localized, spontaneous religious expressions and the more institutionalized cult.
  • Mythic Reinterpretation: The mythology of priesthood during this period becomes less uniform, with various traditions coexisting. This pluralism later sets the stage for debates about the “true” or “ideal” form of priesthood in Israel’s collective memory.

4. The Monarchical Era

Centralization and National Identity:

  • Temple Cult and Royal Integration: Under the unified monarchy of David and Solomon, the priesthood is closely linked to the state. The construction of Solomon’s Temple symbolizes a peak in religious centralization, where priestly functions and royal authority merge to form a unified national narrative.
  • Deuteronomistic Influence: Reforms associated with the Deuteronomistic tradition emphasize the exclusive worship at Jerusalem’s Temple. This not only bolsters the authority of the priesthood but also integrates it into a broader ideological project that legitimizes the monarchy.
  • Mythic Transformation: In this era, the priesthood’s mythic theology is redefined as a guarantor of both religious purity and political stability. The temple becomes the tangible locus of divine presence, and the priesthood is tasked with maintaining the covenantal relationship between God and a centralized nation.

5. The Exilic and Post-Exilic Era

From Temple to Text and Community:

  • Crisis and Reorientation: The Babylonian exile, with its destruction of the Temple, forces a dramatic rethinking of priestly authority. With the loss of the central cultic space, the priesthood’s role shifts from managing ritual sacrifice to preserving sacred texts and traditions.
  • Custodians of Identity: In the post-exilic period, figures like Ezra and Nehemiah emerge as leaders who use the written law to rebuild a fragmented community. The mythic theology of the priesthood is reoriented toward internal, community-based practice, emphasizing study, interpretation, and legal reform.
  • Internalization of the Divine: The focus on the Word and the law transforms the notion of priestly mediation. Rather than relying on an external temple, the renewed priesthood becomes the guardian of an internalized, spiritual covenant—one that defines Israel’s identity in a diasporic context.

Summary

Over time, the priesthood in ancient Israel transitioned from a non-institutional archetype in the patriarchal era to a highly regulated, temple-centered institution during the Exodus, Monarchical, and Exilic periods. Each phase reflects broader shifts in Israel’s socio-political and religious landscape—from decentralized, enigmatic traditions to centralized, state-sponsored worship, and finally to a reimagined, text-based mediation that secured communal identity in the face of crisis. Historical-critical scholarship thus underscores the dynamic interplay between myth, ritual, and institutional authority in shaping Israel’s evolving priestly theology.

---

II - The Evolution of Judaism through Time

Next, let's note that ancient Israel's religion did not develop in isolation but was deeply embedded in—and reactive to—the religious and cultural currents of the ancient Near East. Historical-critical scholarship shows that as Israel evolved, so did its religious system, absorbing, reinterpreting, and sometimes contesting elements from surrounding cultures. 

Here’s how that process unfolded:


1. Shared Near Eastern Context

  • Cultural Milieu:
    Ancient Israel emerged in a region where polytheism, temple cults, and ritual practices were widespread. The mythologies, legal traditions, and sacrificial systems of neighboring peoples—such as the Mesopotamians, Canaanites, and Egyptians—formed a common cultural background.
  • Linguistic and Symbolic Parallels:
    Terms like “el” or “elohim” (used in reference to God) reflect a shared ancient vocabulary for the divine, one that originally belonged to a broader group of deities before Israel’s religion gradually embraced monotheism.

2. Influence of Canaanite Religion

  • Local Religious Practices:
    As Israel settled in Canaan, many of its early cultic practices—such as the use of high places, altars, and sacred groves—mirrored the indigenous Canaanite religious system.
  • Mythic Overlap:
    Stories and names from the Canaanite pantheon appear in Israelite texts in reworked form. For example, while Canaanites worshipped deities like El and Baal, Israelite tradition reinterpreted “El” as the singular, supreme God, distancing itself from the polytheistic context while still using familiar symbols and imagery.
  • Reform Movements:
    Later biblical reforms (especially those seen in the Deuteronomistic history) explicitly rejected many Canaanite practices, promoting centralized worship in Jerusalem and a monotheistic framework that redefined the earlier, more eclectic traditions.

3. Mesopotamian Parallels

  • Myth and Narrative:
    Mesopotamian literature—such as the creation and flood narratives found in the Enuma Elish or the Epic of Gilgamesh—shares notable similarities with biblical texts. These parallels suggest that Israelite authors were aware of, and engaging with, stories circulating in the wider region.
  • Cosmology and Divine Council:
    Like Mesopotamian traditions, early Israelite texts sometimes depict a divine council or assembly of heavenly beings. Over time, however, this image was refined into a strictly monotheistic vision, with God as the singular sovereign ruler who stands apart from any council of deities.

4. Egyptian and Other Influences

  • Exilic and Ritual Elements:
    Egypt’s long history of elaborate temple rituals and administrative organization left its mark on the idea of a formal priesthood and ritual purity. During the Exodus narrative and the wilderness period, some ritual elements (such as sacrificial systems and tabernacle design) echo Egyptian religious practices even as they are reinterpreted within a distinct Israelite covenantal framework.
  • Political and Ideological Interactions:
    Throughout its history, Israel’s leaders sometimes adopted or adapted political and ideological motifs from dominant regional powers, including Egypt. These influences can be seen in royal imagery and in the language of divine kingship, where the Israelite Davidic king reflects broader Near Eastern traditions of the god-ordained monarch, yet is also redefined in light of prophetic and covenantal expectations.

5. Distinctive Reconfigurations

  • From Polytheism to Monotheism:
    While many surrounding cultures maintained polytheistic systems, Israel’s religion evolved toward monotheism—a radical reinterpretation that restructured familiar symbols (like sacred altars, temple cults, and divine assemblies) into a framework that emphasized one transcendent God.
  • Covenantal Theology:
    Unlike the more transactional or ritualistic pacts common in other cultures, Israel’s covenant (as articulated in texts like Exodus and Deuteronomy) framed the relationship with the divine in terms of ethical and legal obligations. This marked a shift from neighboring religious practices toward a more personalized and communal identity.
  • Priestly Ideology:
    The transformation of the priesthood—from the enigmatic figures of the patriarchal era to the highly institutionalized cult of the Jerusalem Temple—also mirrors the broader cultural negotiations. Israel’s priestly texts rework and systematize traditions that were familiar in the ancient Near East, while simultaneously asserting a unique, divinely ordained identity.

Conclusion

Ancient Israel’s religious system reflects a complex interplay between indigenous developments and the cultural, political, and religious influences of its neighbors. By engaging with and ultimately reconfiguring the mythic and ritual traditions of surrounding cultures, Israelite religion forged a distinct identity—one that moved from polytheistic and localized practices toward a unique covenantal monotheism. This evolution not only highlights the adaptive and dialogical nature of ancient religious thought but also underscores how cultural interaction can lead to profound theological innovation.

---

III - Biblical-Historical References

Below is a list of scholarly works that provide background and support for the historical‐critical perspectives on how ancient Israel’s religion both developed internally and engaged with its Near Eastern neighbors:

Mark S. Smith, The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford University Press, 2001).

Explores how Israel’s transition from a polytheistic milieu to monotheism was influenced by Ugaritic texts and broader ancient Near Eastern traditions.

According to the Bible, ancient Israel's neighbors worshipped a wide variety of gods. In recent years, scholars have sought a better understanding of this early polytheistic milieu and its relation to Yahweh, the God of Israel. Drawing on ancient Ugaritic texts and looking closely at Ugaritic deities, Mark Smith examines the meaning of "divinity" in the ancient near East and considers how this concept applies to Yahweh.



John Day, Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan (Sheffield Academic Press, 1999).

Examines the interplay between Canaanite deities and the emerging concept of a singular, supreme God in Israelite religion.

This masterly book is the climax of over twenty-five years of study of the impact of Canaanite religion and mythology on ancient Israel and the Old Testament. It is John Day's magnum opus in which he sets forth all his main arguments and conclusions on the subject. The work considers in detail the relationship between Yahweh and the various gods and goddesses of Canaan, including the leading gods El and Baal, the great goddesses (Asherah, Astarte and Anat), astral deities (Sun, Moon and Lucifer), and underworld deities (Mot, Resheph, Molech and the Rephaim). Day assesses both what Yahwism assimilated from these deities and what it came to reject. More generally he discusses the impact of Canaanite polytheism on ancient Israel and how monotheism was eventually achieved.

Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman, The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of its Sacred Texts (Simon & Schuster, 2001).

Provides an archaeological perspective on how Israel’s religious practices and institutions evolved in response to their cultural and political context.

In this groundbreaking work that sets apart fact and legend, authors Finkelstein and Silberman use significant archeological discoveries to provide historical information about biblical Israel and its neighbors.

In this iconoclastic and provocative work, leading scholars Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman draw on recent archaeological research to present a dramatically revised portrait of ancient Israel and its neighbors. They argue that crucial evidence (or a telling lack of evidence) at digs in Israel, Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon suggests that many of the most famous stories in the Bible—the wanderings of the patriarchs, the Exodus from Egypt, Joshua’s conquest of Canaan, and David and Solomon’s vast empire—reflect the world of the later authors rather than actual historical facts.

Challenging the fundamentalist readings of the scriptures and marshaling the latest archaeological evidence to support its new vision of ancient Israel, The Bible Unearthed offers a fascinating and controversial perspective on when and why the Bible was written and why it possesses such great spiritual and emotional power today.


Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Harvard University Press, 1973).
Offers a comparative look at mythologies in the ancient Near East, highlighting both similarities and distinct developments in Israelite narratives.

The essays in this volume address key aspects of Israelite religious development. Frank Moore Cross traces the continuities between early Israelite religion and the Canaanite culture from which it emerged; explores the tension between the mythic and the historical in Israel’s religious expression; and examines the reemergence of Canaanite mythic material in the apocalypticism of early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Lester L. Grabbe, Ancient Israel: What Do We Know and How Do We Know It? (T&T Clark, 2007).

Presents a comprehensive overview of Israel’s history and religious evolution, including interactions with neighboring cultures.

In Ancient Israel Lester L. Grabbe sets out to summarize what we know through a survey of sources and how we know it by a discussion of methodology and by evaluating the evidence. The most basic question about the history of ancient Israel, how do we know what we know, leads to the fundamental questions of Grabbe's work: what are the sources for the history of Israel and how do we evaluate them? How do we make them 'speak' to us through the fog of centuries?

Grabbe focuses on original sources, including inscriptions, papyri, and archaeology. He examines the problems involved in historical methodology and deals with the major issues surrounding the use of the biblical text when writing a history of this period. Ancient Israel provides an enlightening overview and critique of current scholarly debate. It can therefore serve as a 'handbook' or reference-point for those wanting a catalogue of original sources, scholarship, and secondary studies. Grabbe's clarity of style makes this book eminently accessible not only to students of biblical studies and ancient history but also to the interested lay reader.

For this new edition the entire text has been reworked to take account of new archaeological discoveries and theories. There is a major expansion to include a comprehensive coverage of David and Solomon and more detailed information on specific kings of Israel throughout. Grabbe has also added material on the historicity of the Exodus, and provided a thorough update of the material on the later bronze age.


John Barton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Historical Books of the Hebrew Bible (Oxford University Press, 2011).

Contains essays that address how the religious reforms and institutions in ancient Israel were shaped by and reacted to the wider cultural context.

The Oxford Handbook of Historical Books of the Hebrew Bible is a collection of essays that provide resources for the interpretation of the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. The volume is not exhaustive in its coverage, but examines interpretive aspects of these books that are deemed essential for interpretation or that are representative of significant trends in present and future scholarship. The individual essays are united by their focus on two guiding questions: (1) What does this topic have to do with the Old Testament Historical Books? and (2) How does this topic help readers better interpret the Old Testament Historical Books? Each essay critically surveys prior scholarship before presenting current and prospective approaches.

Taking into account the ongoing debates concerning the relationship between the Old Testament texts and historical events in the ancient world, data from Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian culture and history are used to provide a larger context for the content of the Historical Books. Essays consider specific issues related to Israelite/Judean history (settlement, state formation, monarchy, forced migration, and return) as they relate to the interpretation of the Historical Books. This volume also explores the specific themes, concepts, and content that are most essential for interpreting these books. In light of the diverse material included in this section of the Old Testament, the Handbook further examines interpretive strategies that employ various redactional, synthetic, and theory-based approaches. Beyond the Old Testament proper, subsequent texts, traditions, and cultures often received and interpreted the material in the Historical Books, and so the volume concludes by investigating the literary, social, and theological aspects of that reception.


BAS, Jewish Worship, Pagan Symbols: Zodiac mosaics in ancient synagogues, by Walter Zanger, posted July 04, 2024.

Questions of why the mosaic tiles of the zodiac were discovered in an ancient synagogue. I might posit myself that the synagogue ceased in its function and became a residence of non-Jews oriented to the cultural artistry of their day - re slater

These references offer insight into the processes by which ancient Israel's religion absorbed, adapted, and sometimes rejected the mythic and ritual traditions of the surrounding cultures.


No comments:

Post a Comment