The ontological series began by asking what reality consistently discloses about itself. It observed recurring patterns of relation, coherence, embodiment, persistence, identity, meaning, direction, possibility, and participation. Its task was descriptive. It sought to correspond faithfully to reality before attempting to explain it.
The metaphysical series began differently. Rather than asking what reality discloses, it asked how reality continually becomes what ontology observes. Why do coherent realities emerge? How does embodiment arise? Why does persistence become possible? What kind of reality continually generates these recurring structures?
Only after both studies had matured did their deeper relationship become fully apparent.
This essay explores the relationship between the two. It argues that ontology and metaphysics are not competing disciplines but complementary studies within a single philosophical inquiry. Ontology observes reality as it is encountered. Metaphysics explores the generative activity through which that reality continually becomes. One disciplines philosophical imagination through correspondence; the other enlarges philosophical understanding through explanation.
This realization also reveals something that many philosophical systems leave implicit. It distinguishes the order of inquiry from the order of reality. Our inquiry necessarily began with ontology, allowing observation to discipline metaphysical reflection. However, reality itself continually unfolds through relation, becoming, coherence, embodiment, and participation before ontology ever describes their enduring achievements.
Consequently, this essay is neither an appendix to ontology nor an appendix to metaphysics. It is a methodological bridge between two philosophical approaches to the same reality. It explains why the two projects belong together, how each depends upon the other, and why both ultimately return us to the same place: reality itself - now seen with greater clarity, coherence, and philosophical depth.
Ontology disciplines metaphysics
while metaphysics explains ontology.- R. E. Slater
Ontology begins with observation. It asks what reality consistently discloses about itself. Rather than proposing speculative explanations, ontology first seeks faithful description. It attends carefully to recurring patterns, enduring structures, and stable relationships that appear across every scale of existence. Its first responsibility is correspondence - allowing reality to speak before philosophy attempts to explain what has been observed. Naturally, our present philosophical reflection benefits from the cumulative work of philosophers, scientists, theologians, and ethicists across many centuries. To them we owe much.
Metaphysics begins where ontology necessarily pauses. Having observed the recurring structures of reality, it asks why those structures arise at all. Why should relation prove so fundamental? How does coherence emerge? Why does embodiment become possible? What kind of reality continually generates the patterns ontology faithfully describes?
The distinction is subtle but profound. Ontology asks, What is reality disclosing? Metaphysics asks, What kind of reality makes those disclosures possible? The two disciplines therefore investigate the same world while asking fundamentally different questions and different approaches of it.
This distinction also clarifies the relationship between Embodied Process Realism and Open Relational Process Metaphysics of Becoming. EPR neither competes with ORPMOB nor is it superseded by it. Rather, each completes what the other alone cannot accomplish. Ontology provides the disciplined vocabulary through which reality is described. Metaphysics provides the generative grammar through which that vocabulary becomes intelligible.
Together they invite philosophy to move in two complementary directions. Ontology asks us to observe reality carefully before drawing conclusions. Metaphysics asks us to seek the deeper principles through which those observations continually arise. One protects philosophy from speculation detached from experience. The other prevents observation from remaining merely descriptive. Together they offer a more comprehensive way of understanding reality than either discipline can provide by itself.
This mutual relationship is not simply methodological; it is philosophical. It reflects the conviction that faithful observation and careful explanation belong together. Reality first invites us to see. Philosophy then invites us to understand.
Ontology observes what reality has become.
Metaphysics asks how reality continually becomes.- R. E. Slater
The answer lies in recognizing the difference between the order of inquiry and the order of reality. These are not identical, and much philosophical confusion has resulted from treating them as though they were.
The order of inquiry begins with ontology. Human understanding naturally proceeds by observation before explanation. We first encounter reality, describe its recurring patterns, and allow those observations to discipline our philosophical reflection. Only then do we ask why those patterns exist and what kind of reality continually gives rise to them. In this way, ontology serves as philosophy's first act of intellectual humility. It listens before it speaks.
The order of reality, however, unfolds differently. Reality does not begin with our descriptions of it. Before ontology can describe coherence, coherence must emerge. Before identity can be recognized, persistence must become possible. Before persistence can endure, embodiment must arise. Beneath these enduring achievements lies a deeper generative movement through which relation gives rise to becoming, becoming gradually forms coherence, coherence stabilizes into embodiment, and embodiment continually opens new possibilities for participation.
This inversion is not a contradiction but a defining feature of a disciplined philosophical method. Epistemologically, observation precedes explanation. Metaphysically, however, explanation concerns the generative activity through which the realities we observe continually arise. Our investigation therefore proceeds from ontology to metaphysics, while reality itself continually unfolds from metaphysics into ontology.
Many metaphysical systems begin by proposing first principles and then interpreting reality in light of their proposals. The present project has intentionally followed the opposite path. It begins by observing reality through ontology then allowing those observations to discipline its metaphysical reflections. This is why the EPR series was intentionally developed before the ORPMOB series. Only after ontology had established a disciplined correspondence with reality could metaphysics responsibly explore the generative activity through which those observations continually arise.
Consequently, we are proposing a process-relational metaphysics that is consciously grounded in ontological correspondence before offering metaphysical explanation. Its ambition is not to construct an abstract system and then seek confirmation, but to allow reality to remain the final measure of philosophical understanding.
The relationship may therefore be summarized in two complementary movements.
The Order of Inquiry
Observation → Ontology → Metaphysics → Understanding
The Order of Reality
Relation → Becoming → Coherence → Embodiment → Participation
The first describes how philosophy comes to know.
The second describes how reality continually becomes.
Ontology describes reality.Metaphysics explains reality.- R. E. Slater
Relation → Coherence → Embodiment → Persistence → Identity →
Meaning → Direction → Possibility → Participation
The metaphysical grammar of Open Relational Process Metaphysics of Becoming approaches the same reality from another direction. Rather than describing the enduring achievements of reality, it asks how those achievements continually arise. It therefore follows the generative movement through which relation gives rise to becoming, becoming gradually forms coherence, coherence stabilizes into embodiment, and embodiment continually opens new possibilities for participation.
Relation → Becoming → Coherence → Embodiment → Participation
The two grammars therefore describe different dimensions of one continuous reality.
EPR asks:
What does reality repeatedly become?
Its task is descriptive. It develops the vocabulary through which reality may be faithfully recognized.
ORPMOB asks:
How does reality continually become?
Its task is explanatory. It develops the generative grammar through which that vocabulary becomes philosophically intelligible.
Seen together, the relationship becomes surprisingly elegant. Ontology largely speaks through relatively stable realities - relation, coherence, embodiment, identity, meaning, and participation. Metaphysics speaks through activities - relation generates, becoming forms, coherence stabilizes, embodiment opens, and participation continually renews reality's unfolding history.
The distinction is not merely grammatical. It reflects two complementary ways of attending to reality itself. Ontology teaches philosophy to recognize what has emerged. Metaphysics teaches philosophy to understand how emergence continually occurs. Together they form a single philosophical language capable of describing both the enduring achievements of reality and the generative activity through which those achievements continually arise.
Reality is one.
Our questions about reality are many.- R. E. Slater
The following correspondences illustrate this relationship.
Relation
Ontology first observes that reality is fundamentally relational. Nothing exists entirely by itself. Every organism, ecosystem, society, and galaxy exists within networks of mutual dependence. Relation therefore appears not as an accidental feature of reality but as one of its most universal characteristics.
Metaphysics then asks why this should be so. Rather than treating relation as something existing between independently complete entities, ORPMOB proposes that relation itself belongs to the very constitution of reality. Relation is not merely what connects reality - it is how reality continually exists.
Becoming
Here the two systems intentionally diverge.
Ontology has little need for becoming because ontology observes what reality has already become. That is, becoming is a constitutive activity of reality that ontology is seeking to describe. Thus, ontology faithfully describes the enduring realities presented to it through observation.
Metaphysics, however, asks how those realities continually arise. Becoming therefore occupies a central place within ORPMOB. It is not merely another category alongside relation or embodiment. It is the generative activity through which relation continually gives rise to coherent realities.
Emergence is one expression of this becoming.
Becoming itself is the deeper metaphysical principle.
Coherence
Ontology repeatedly encounters coherent realities throughout nature. Atoms remain stable. Organisms develop integrated forms. Ecosystems sustain remarkable balances. Galaxies exhibit persistent organization across immense scales of space and time.
Metaphysics asks how such coherence continually becomes possible. ORPMOB proposes that becoming is not random activity but progressively forms coherent patterns capable of increasing stability, complexity, and enduring participation.
Coherence therefore represents one of the great achievements of becoming.
Embodiment
Ontology observes that coherent realities become embodied. They acquire presence, stability, and recognizable existence within the world.
Metaphysics asks how embodiment arises. It proposes that embodiment represents the temporary realization of coherent histories of becoming. Every embodied reality therefore carries within itself the relational history through which it emerged.
Embodiment is not the opposite of becoming.
It is becoming made present.
Persistence
Persistence belongs primarily to ontology because ontology observes what endures through time.
Yet metaphysics quietly explains why persistence becomes possible. Once coherent realities achieve embodiment, they may continue, develop, and participate in subsequent histories of becoming.
Persistence is therefore successful embodiment through time.
Identity
Identity naturally follows persistence. Only realities capable of enduring may gradually acquire recognizable identities.
Identity is therefore not an original property imposed upon reality.
It is an achievement.
Every identity represents the historical consequence of successful relational becoming.
Meaning
Meaning emerges wherever identities become sufficiently stable to enter into enduring relationships of interpretation.
Ontology describes meaning as an observable dimension of reality.
Metaphysics explains why meaningful realities continually arise from histories of relation, becoming, coherence, and embodiment.
Meaning therefore becomes one of reality's highest relational achievements.
Direction
Direction follows naturally from meaning. Histories possessing coherence and meaning no longer remain indifferent to their own development. They begin to display tendencies, trajectories, aspirations, and possibilities.
Direction is not externally imposed (ex., predetermined)
It gradually emerges from reality's own unfolding history.
Possibility
Possibility represents the continually expanding horizon opened by successful histories of becoming.
Ontology observes that reality remains open.
Metaphysics explains why openness belongs to reality itself.
Every coherent embodiment enlarges the possibilities available to future becoming.
Participation
Here the two systems beautifully converge.
Ontology culminates in participation because participation represents the mature expression of every previous ontological achievement. Relation, coherence, embodiment, persistence, identity, meaning, direction, and possibility all become capacities through which realities participate in larger relational histories.
Metaphysics also culminates in participation, but for another reason. Participation represents the fulfillment of becoming itself. Every embodied achievement immediately enters new relations, giving rise to further becoming, deeper coherence, and additional possibilities.
The two systems therefore meet precisely where philosophy returns to life itself. Participation is not merely the final concept within two philosophical grammars. It is the place where explanation and description become lived reality. Participation is where embodied histories become shared histories.
Reality first invites us to see.Philosophy then invites us to understand.- R. E. Slater
Seen together, the progression becomes remarkably coherent.
ORPMOB explains reality →
EPR describes reality →
Interpretation seeks reality's meaning →
Theology explores reality's orientation →
Ethics responds to reality →
Participation embodies reality in lived experience.
Each movement naturally prepares for the next. This is "the order of reality."
Metaphysics without ontology risks becoming speculation.
Ontology without metaphysics risks remaining merely descriptive.
Interpretation without both lacks an adequate foundation.
Theology without philosophical discipline becomes detached from reality.
Ethics without theological or philosophical reflection risks becoming merely pragmatic.
Participation, however, gathers every preceding movement into lived existence. Philosophy finally returns to the world from which it first began.
The progression therefore describes more than an academic sequence. It reflects the gradual deepening of human understanding itself. We first observe reality. We then seek to understand its generative character. We interpret its significance. We ask toward what horizons it may orient our lives. We respond ethically. Finally, we participate consciously within the very reality that first invited our attention.
In this sense, philosophy completes a circle.
Observation leads to ontology.
Ontology invites metaphysics.
Metaphysics deepens interpretation.
Interpretation opens theological reflection.
Theology inspires ethical response.
Ethics becomes participation.
Participation, in turn, returns us once more to reality itself, where the journey begins again.
The circle is never closed. It continually expands. This is "the order of inquiry."
Every act of participation becomes another occasion for observation, another invitation to understanding, and another beginning in the ongoing adventure of philosophical reflection.
The relationship between EPR and ORPMOB therefore represents more than the correspondence of two philosophical systems. It reflects a way of doing philosophy that remains accountable to reality while remaining open to continual discovery. Rather than constructing abstract systems - whether philosophical, scientific, or theological - that are detached from experience, it allows observation, explanation, and participation to remain in constant conversation with one another.
Reality is not exhausted by our descriptions of it.
Neither is it exhausted by our explanations.
Both remain invitations to continue participating in the inexhaustible richness of reality itself.
Ontology first taught us to observe.
Metaphysics taught us to ask why.
Together they transformed description into understanding.
Yet the journey does not end there. Interpretation seeks meaning. Theology explores orientation. Ethics embodies response. Participation returns philosophy to lived existence, where every new experience becomes another invitation to observe, to understand, and to participate more deeply in the continuing adventure of reality.
The distinction between the order of inquiry and the order of reality therefore becomes one of the defining insights of this project. Human understanding begins with observation before explanation. Reality itself, however, continually unfolds through relation, becoming, coherence, embodiment, and participation before those achievements are ever recognized by philosophical reflection. Embodiment preserves these achievements as histories capable of further participation
The philosopher therefore occupies a posture of continual humility. Reality always precedes our descriptions of it. It continually exceeds our explanations of it. Every philosophical achievement remains provisional - not because reality lacks coherence, but because reality continually generates new possibilities inviting deeper understanding.
In this sense, philosophy itself participates in reality's becoming.
Its task is not to possess reality but to accompany it.
Not to conclude the conversation but to deepen it.
Not to master the world but to learn continually from it.
Perhaps this is the greatest lesson shared by both ontology and metaphysics. Reality is not merely something we observe. It is something within which we already participate.
To study reality is therefore never an exercise in detached analysis alone. It is also an invitation to greater attentiveness, deeper understanding, and more faithful participation in the world that continually gives rise to us even as we seek to understand it.
Reality first invited us to observe.
Ontology taught us to describe.
Metaphysics taught us to understand.
The journey has now returned us to reality - not with a different world before us, but with a deeper way of inhabiting the one that has always been there.
And perhaps that is philosophy's highest calling.
Aristotle. Metaphysics. Translated by Joe Sachs. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press, 1999.
Heraclitus. Fragments. Translated by Brooks Haxton. New York: Viking, 2001.
Plato. Timaeus. Translated by Donald J. Zeyl. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2000.
Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1967.
———. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968.
———. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected ed. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Cobb, John B., Jr. A Christian Natural Theology. 2nd ed. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2007.
Griffin, David Ray. Reenchantment without Supernaturalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.
Hartshorne, Charles. Reality as Social Process. New York: Hafner Publishing, 1953.
Oord, Thomas Jay. The Death of Omnipotence and Birth of Amipotence. Grasmere, ID: SacraSage Press, 2023.
Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1996.
Segall, Matthew David. Physics of the World-Soul. Albany: SUNY Press, 2021.
Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944.
Frankl, Viktor E. Man's Search for Meaning. Boston: Beacon Press, 2006.
Heschel, Abraham Joshua. God in Search of Man. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1955.
Maritain, Jacques. The Degrees of Knowledge. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.
Nurse, Paul. What Is Life? Five Great Ideas in Biology. New York: W. W. Norton, 2020.
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Capra, Fritjof, and Pier Luigi Luisi. The Systems View of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Holland, John H. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Reading, MA: Perseus Books, 1998.
Kauffman, Stuart A. At Home in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Laland, Kevin N. Darwin's Unfinished Symphony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Laland, Kevin N., Tobias Uller, Marcus W. Feldman, Kim Sterelny, Gerd B. Müller, Armin Moczek, Eva Jablonka, et al. “The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282, no. 1813 (2015).
Meadows, Donella H. Thinking in Systems. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.
Mitchell, Melanie. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Morin, Edgar. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2008.
Noble, Denis. Dance to the Tune of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. Order Out of Chaos. New York: Bantam Books, 1984.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Continuum, 1989.
Ricœur, Paul. Interpretation Theory. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press, 1976.
Taylor, Mark C. Erring: A Postmodern A/Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Craig, Edward, ed. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1998.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman.
Slater, R. E.
———. Reality and Cosmology Series (Embodied Process Realism).
———. Reality and Metaphysics Series (Open Relational Process Metaphysics of Becoming).
