Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Monday, January 5, 2026

Evolution of Worship and Religions: Part V - Becoming Aligned with the Sacred (15)



The Evolution of Worship and Religion:
From Cosmic Awe to Processual Faith

A Metamodern Journey through the History of the Sacred


FROM BELIEF TO TRANSFORMATION
PART V - ESSAY  15

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

The sacred is not what we believe about the world,
but what the world invites us to become in response.



Essay 15

Becoming Aligned with the Sacred

Beyond Belief & Toward Participation


Preface: Locating the Sacred in Religious Evolution

Across the long arc traced in Evolution of Worship and Religion, one pattern recurs with remarkable consistency: the sacred is never static. From animistic participation in natural forces, through axial metaphysical abstraction, to later institutionalized belief systems and modern secular critiques, religious life continually reconfigures how humans relate to what they name as ultimate, holy, or the Sacred-divine.

This essay emerges from that historical trajectory. It does not seek to introduce a new doctrine of the sacred, nor to defend a particular religious tradition. Instead, it proposes a processual reframing: that alignment with the sacred is best understood not as belief in fixed propositions, but as participatory orientation within an evolving relational world.

Such a reframing is neither antiquarian nor reactionary. It is a constructive response to the historical exhaustion of belief-centered religion and the simultaneous insufficiency of purely secular disenchantment. What follows situates the Sacred not behind us, nor above us, but within the ongoing processes of becoming that constitutes reality itself.

Introduction: Beyond Belief

In much of Western religious history, alignment with the sacred has been treated primarily as a matter of correct belief and ritualized orthodoxy. That is, correct ideas held about God, about the cosmos, morality, or what constitutes effectuating salvation. Historic Orthodoxy has functioned both  as compass and boundary, defining who was “in alignment with the Sacred” and who was not. While such frameworks offered coherence and continuity, they also produced rigidity, exclusion, and frequent dissonance with lived experience.

Modernity exposed these tensions. Scientific cosmology, historical criticism, and corporate pluralism and blending rendered many inherited belief structures increasingly fragile. Yet the collapse of certainty did not erase the human orientation toward the sacred; it merely displaced it. The persistence of longing, meaning-making, and moral imagination suggests that the sacred was never reducible to belief alone.

Process philosophy offers a constructive alternative. Rather than asking what must be believed, it asks how reality becomes. Within this framework, the sacred is not a static object of assent but a dynamic depth-dimension of relational becoming. Alignment, therefore, is not achieved through cognitive agreement, but through participatory responsiveness.

I. The Sacred as Process, Not Object

At the heart of process thought lies a decisive metaphysical shift: reality is composed not of enduring substances but of events, relations, and ongoing processes. Nothing simply is; everything becomes. Applied to religious reflection, this means the sacred cannot be adequately conceived as a fixed entity standing apart from (or over-and-above) the world of creation.

Instead, the sacred relates to creation as its lure toward coherence, intensity, and value within becoming itself. It is not imposed from without but arises through relational interaction. In Whiteheadian terms, it functions persuasively rather than coercively, inviting participation rather than demanding submission.

This understanding resonates with earlier stages of religious evolution - particularly animistic and indigenous traditions - while avoiding their cosmological limitations. The sacred is neither anthropomorphized nor abstracted into metaphysical remoteness. It is encountered where relations deepen, where novelty emerges, and where shared flourishing becomes possible.

II. Alignment as Orientation Rather Than Assent

If the sacred is processual, alignment cannot be defined as assent to timeless truths. Alignment becomes a matter of orientation - how one is situated within the flow of becoming.

Orientation is inherently provisional. It adjusts as contexts shift, as histories accumulate, and as new possibilities emerge. This distinguishes alignment from obedience. Obedience presumes a fixed command structure; alignment presumes responsiveness to evolving conditions.

Such responsiveness is ethical as well as metaphysical. To be aligned with the sacred is to cultivate attentiveness, care, and creative participation. It is to live with the world rather than over it, where recognizing that every action contributes - however modestly—to the direction reality takes.

III. Participation Over Possession

Belief-centered religion tends toward possession: truth is something one has. Participatory-centered spirituality emphasizes entry; whereas truth is something one joins. This shift carries significant implications.

Participation reframes worship as:

  • engagement rather than compliance;
  • ethics as relational responsibility rather than rule enforcement; and,
  • theology as interpretive practice rather than final explanation.

Communities shaped by participation remain open to revision, dialogue, and growth, resisting the closure that often accompanies doctrinal fixity and finality.

In evolutionary terms, this marks a maturation of religious consciousness. The Sacred is no longer secured by institutional authority alone, nor dismissed by secular critique, but encountered through lived relationality.

IV. Misalignment, Suffering, and Creative Reorientation

A processual account of alignment does not deny suffering or failure. On the contrary, it takes them seriously as intrinsic to unfinished becoming. Misalignment is not primarily moral transgression; it is incongruence within evolving relational fields.

Where classical theologies often interpret misalignment as sin requiring correction, process theology interprets it as a call to reorientation. Suffering becomes a site of potential transformation - not because it is divinely willed, but because new possibilities can emerge from fractured coherence.

Alignment, therefore, is not linear progression. It is a continual practice of recalibration, learning to respond creatively to uncertainty and disruption rather than retreating into certainty and assurance.

V. The Sacred Without Coercion

One of the most consequential outcomes of this framework is its rejection of coercive sacred power. If the sacred operates persuasively rather than unilaterally as divine power, then domination, exclusion, and violence lose theological legitimacy. Hence, the church's teachings on divine sovereignty are appropriately reinterpreted within process theology emphasizing love and not divine enforcement.

This aligns with a broader ethical trajectory traced throughout Evolution of Worship and Religion series: as religious consciousness evolves, the sacred increasingly withdraws from authoritarian forms and reappears as relational depth, moral imagination, and participatory responsibility.

To be aligned with the sacred, in this sense, is to resist systems of oppression - whether religious, political, or ideological. Systems which suppress processually becoming outcome in favor of controlling outcome.

Conclusion: The Sacred as Ongoing Invitation

Becoming aligned with the sacred is not a final state. It is a posture of heart and mind and soul - one that is open, responsive, and unfinished. It does not promise certainty, but it offers relational, pantheistic coherence. It does not remove ambiguity, but it deepens relational, processual participation.

Within a processual worldview, the Sacred is not what stands above becoming. It is what calls relational becoming forward. Alignment, then, is less about belief than about fidelity to relational possibility - how one listens, responds, and contributes to the world’s processual unfolding.

Beyond belief lies participation.
Beyond possession lies orientation.
Beyond static holiness lies sacred becoming.



Alignment

We did not come to so simply
believe in sacredness,
or to name the Sacred,
but to learn its nature -
how to lean into life
without enclosing it
to finality and conclusion.

The Sacred does not stand above us,
armed with certainty and despair -
but moves within the fragile grammar
of processual becoming.

We feel it when attention deepens,
when heartfelt care outpaces fear,
when the world answers our listening
with more than we had expected.

Not by command, but by invitation.
Not by cosmic portendings,
but by divine adjustments.
A quiet drawing-forward,
an allurement, reaches
through what is unfinished
to guide, to comfort, to heal.

Even now, humanity senses
divine silence and the grave,
not in denying these events,
but in the opening of
a sacred way through them.

Here, alignment is not escape.
It is staying. Remaining.
With hands and heart open.
With steps tentatively searching.
Participating in the slow courage
of what is still, and ever will,
be becoming within the
heart of the Sacred.


R.E. Slater
January 4, 2026
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved




~ Continue to Part VI, SM 1 ~


Evolution of Worship & Religion


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Process Philosophy & Theology

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. Corrected Edition. Free Press, 1978.

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. Fordham University Press, 1996.

  • Cobb, John B., Jr., and David Ray Griffin. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Westminster Press, 1976.

  • Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Process. Fortress Press, 2008.

  • Oord, Thomas Jay. The Uncontrolling Love of God. IVP Academic, 2015.

  • Suchocki, Marjorie Hewitt. God, Christ, Church: A Practical Guide to Process Theology. Chalice Press, 1989.

Sacred, Participation, and Religious Evolution

  • Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. Harcourt, 1959.

  • Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. The Meaning and End of Religion. Fortress Press, 1991.

  • Bellah, Robert N. Religion in Human Evolution. Harvard University Press, 2011.

  • Armstrong, Karen. The Case for God. Knopf, 2009.

  • Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular. Stanford University Press, 2003.

Metamodern, Relational, and Participatory Thought

  • Vermeulen, Timotheus, and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on Metamodernism.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2010.

  • Connolly, William E. A World of Becoming. Duke University Press, 2011.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. Difference and Repetition. Columbia University Press, 1994.

  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. The Phenomenon of Man. Harper & Row, 1959.

Optional Integrative Thread (your project lineage)

  • Slater, R. E. Evolution of Worship and Religion (Essay Series). Relevancy22 Blog Archive.

  • —— Processual Divine Coherence (working archive).


Posted by at 0 comments

The Gnostic Mysterion: the Crisis of Sacred Becoming (SM 12)


Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Supplementary Materials
Part VI, SM 12

The Gnostic Mysterion:
the Crisis of Sacred Becoming

A Process-Historical Reading of Gnosticism

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

"There was a mystery kept secret for long ages,
but now disclosed—not to remove us from the world,
but to reveal what the world is becoming.”

- per Romans 16:25–26, re-voiced



Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Preface

This study arises from a larger inquiry into the evolution of worship and religion - an inquiry that treats religious traditions not as static deposits of timeless truth, but as living, adaptive responses to changing historical, social, psychological, cosmological, and environmental conditions.

Within that long arc, Gnosticism emerges not as a marginal curiosity nor merely as a rejected Christian heresy, but as a critical inflection point: a moment when interior consciousness, moral protest, and cosmological dissatisfaction collided with inherited religious frameworks which could no longer hold them together.

The texts commonly known as the Gnostic Gospels do not speak with one voice, nor do they form a unified movement. Yet they share a recognizable grammar - a sacred mysterion - that discloses how some early faith communities struggled to reconcile awakening, suffering, power, and transcendence in a world increasingly shaped by empire, abstraction, and alienation.

This work does not seek to rehabilitate Gnosticism wholesale, nor to dismiss it reflexively. Instead, it aims to situate Gnostic texts within the evolutionary history of religious consciousness, discerning what can be subsumed, what must be relinquished, and what remains instructive for contemporary theological and philosophical reflection - especially from a process-relational perspective.

Introduction: Why Gnosticism Appears When It Does

Gnosticism did not arise in a vacuum. It emerged at a time when:

  • Temple-centered worship was losing coherence

  • Imperial power had fused religion with domination

  • Philosophical abstraction had outpaced mythic integration

  • Interior awareness had intensified without adequate metaphysical grounding

The result was a crisis: awakening without incarnation, insight without trust in the world’s goodness.

The Gnostic response was radical. It reimagined salvation as gnosis - awakening conjectures of one's true origins beyond the visible cosmos.

  • It recast creation as a mistake or deception.
  • It transformed Jesus from incarnate redeemer into revelatory demiurge messenger.
  • And it framed history NOT as a site of transformation, but as a mysterious, cryptic veil .

In this sense, the Gnostic Gospels share what can rightly be called a mysterion - a hidden truth disclosed to the awakened few. But this mysterion stands in tension with other religious developments unfolding at the same time, particularly those that would emphasize incarnation, communal participation, and the redemption of becoming itself.

This study therefore asks a guiding question:

What does Gnosticism reveal about the evolution of worship - and where does it fracture under its own metaphysical weight?

1. Gnosticism in the Long Arc of Religious Evolution

The religious movements grouped under the label Gnosticism emerged during the first centuries of the Common Era, a period marked by profound cultural, political, and cosmological upheaval. Temple-centered sacrificial systems were losing their integrative power, imperial structures increasingly fused religion with domination, and philosophical abstraction was reshaping older mythic worldviews. At the same time, interior consciousness - self-reflection, moral awareness, and existential questioning - was intensifying across the Mediterranean and Near Eastern worlds.

Within this context, the Gnostic Gospels and related texts represent neither an isolated aberration nor a fully coherent alternative Christianity. Instead, they constituted a historically intelligible response to a crisis of meaning: the inability of inherited cosmologies to reconcile emerging interior awareness with a world experienced as violent, unjust, and alienating. Gnosticism is therefore best understood as a transitional phenomenon within the broader evolution of worship and religion, one that pressed urgently real questions but resolved them through metaphysical strategies that proved unsustainable.

This essay approaches Gnosticism not primarily as a doctrinal system, but as a pattern of religious consciousness organized around what may properly be called a mysterion: a hidden truth disclosed only to the awakened, concerning the soul’s origin, the nature of the cosmos, and the means of salvation.
2. Salvation through Gnosis (Sacred Mysterion)

Knowledge, Cosmic Dualism, Demiurges, and the false Hebrew God

Despite their diversity, the Gnostic Gospels share a recognizable structure of meaning. Central to this structure is the conviction that human beings possess a divine element - a spark or seed - that originates beyond or outside the visible cosmos. Salvation consists not in forgiveness, ritual participation, or future resurrection, but in gnosis: an awakening inner consciousness/knowledge that recalls the soul to its true origin.
A process form of Christian theology will invert the Gnostic dualism inherent in its cosmology. That all creation is already sacred, not secretly or hiddenly divine. That is, creation is not divided between sacred and profane realms, but is inherently infused with divine presence already. What obscures the sacred is not human embodiment (matter v spirit) but the contingent exercise of free agency within a relational world. Because divine presence functions as a lure toward value rather than as an imposed certainty, the sacred may be disclosed through creative participation or submerged through resistant or destructive patterns of becoming. The religious (or, sacred divine) task is therefore not escape from the world, but the disciplined cooperation within the sacred that would release what is already present.
In this framework, ignorance (agnōsia) rather than sin becomes the fundamental human problem. The world, as ordinarily perceived, functions as a veil that obscures truth rather than as a medium of divine self-disclosure. Mythic cosmologies involving aeons (divine emanations from the ultimate God; this God is NOT the Jewish Creator God, considered by Gnostics as evil for the violence it brought into the world: Flood, death, etc), the Pleroma (a spiritual realm of fullness), the Demiurge (a sub-Spirit born from God's own Spirit), and archons (servants of this ultimate God that helped create material worlds trapping divine souls within who may only escape via gnosis to return to the Pleroma) articulate this alienation symbolically, portraying material reality as the product of error, ignorance, or lesser power.

Jesus, in the Gnostic Gospels, is consequently reinterpreted less as incarnate redeemer than as revelatory messenger (a demiurge of the Gnostic God). He appears as a hierophant (a Gnostic priest) who discloses hidden knowledge through riddles, dialogues, and secret teachings. Resurrection is frequently understood as a present, spiritual awakening rather than a future, bodily event. The mysterion is realized when the soul recognizes itself and remembers its divine provenance.

This initiatory logic - hidden truth, selective disclosure, and transformative insight - aligns Gnosticism structurally with Greco-Roman mystery traditions. Yet it also places Gnostic Christianity in sharp tension with Jewish creation theology and with early Christian movements that emphasized incarnation, communal life, and the redemption of history.
3. Positive Corollaries within Religious Evolution

When situated within the evolutionary history of worship and religion, Gnosticism yields several positive and enduring insights.
  • First, it represents a decisive interiorization of the sacred. Gnostic movements challenged the notion that divine access is mediated exclusively through temple, priesthood, or imperial authority. In doing so, they affirmed subjective experience and consciousness as genuine sites of religious encounter - a development continuous with prophetic interiorization in Israel and with Axial Age introspection more broadly.
  • Second, Gnosticism exhibits a profound suspicion of totalizing power structures. Its mythic portrayal of the Demiurge and archons functions as a symbolic critique of religious systems that legitimize domination and violence. In this respect, Gnostic cosmology can be read less as speculative metaphysics than as moral protest encoded in mythic form.
  • Third, the Gnostic insistence on awakening underscores that religious truth must be transformative rather than merely propositional. Salvation is not assent to correct doctrine but a reorientation of perception and self-understanding. This insight anticipates later mystical traditions and modern existential approaches to religion.
  • Finally, Gnostic texts demonstrate the enduring power of religion as a vehicle for meta-truth. Their narratives diagnose alienation, fragmentation, and longing in ways that literal pantheons and mythic cosmologies cannot. As symbolic expressions, they reveal how religious imagination responds creatively to historical, psychological, and metaphysical strain.
4. Negative Corollaries and Evolutionary Limits

At the same time, Gnosticism exhibits structural limitations that render it an evolutionary dead end rather than a viable culmination of religious development.
  • Most significantly, its metaphysical denigration of the material world undermines ethical responsibility, communal life, and historical engagement. By construing embodiment and becoming as mistakes to be escaped, Gnosticism forfeits the possibility of a redemptive vision that includes nature, society, and future generations.
  • Closely related is the problem of elitism. Gnostic salvation is typically restricted to those capable of receiving gnosis, dividing humanity into the awakened and the incapable. Such spiritual aristocracy fragments community and contradicts the more expansive trajectories of religious evolution which move toward universal participation.
  • Moreover, Gnosticism resolves suffering through withdrawal rather than transformation. Escape replaces hope; transcendence is secured by abandoning history rather than renewing it. In this respect, Gnosticism mirrors the very static perfection it sought to overcome, locating fullness in a fixed realm behind time rather than in an open, creative future.
5. Gnosticism as Threshold Movement

From an evolutionary perspective, Gnosticism is best understood as a threshold phenomenon. It arises when older mythic and cultic systems can no longer integrate emerging consciousness and moral protest, yet before a relational and incarnational synthesis becomes possible. It asks the right questions - about power, suffering, and awakening - but answers them by rejecting the world rather than reimagining it.

This explains both the intensity of early Christian resistance to Gnosticism and its enduring fascination in modern contexts. The conflict was not merely about authority or chronology, but about competing visions of what religious mystery itself entails: whether salvation consists in escaping the world or in participating in its transformation.
6. A Process-Relational Reframing

From a process-relational perspective, the Gnostic mysterion can be critically subsumed without being revived wholesale. Process thought affirms the Gnostic intuition that false totalities exist, that consciousness matters, and that awakening is essential. Yet it rejects the notion that becoming, embodiment, and history are metaphysical errors.

In this reframing, mystery is not a secret exit from the world as versus the inexhaustible depth of relational becoming within the world itself. God does not stand wholly beyond the cosmos but works persuasively within its unfolding, luring creation toward greater complexity, value, and harmony. Redemption is therefore not extraction from matter but the transformation of relations.

What Gnosticism interpreted as a prison, process theology understands as an unfinished world. What Gnosticism sought to escape, process thought seeks to heal.
7. Conclusion

The Gnostic Gospels occupy an indispensable place in the history of religious thought. They testify to a moment when awakening outpaced cosmology, when moral protest exceeded inherited theological forms. Their shared mysterion reveals both the promise and the peril of radical interiorization.

Ultimately, Gnosticism teaches that awakening alone is insufficient. Religious evolution does not culminate in secret knowledge possessed by the few, but in participatory transformation open to all. The enduring mystery is not how to flee the world, but how the sacred continues to emerge within it.

When viewed through the long lens of religious evolution, Gnosticism appears neither as an aberration nor as a lost golden path. Rather, it is best understood as a threshold movement - a necessary but incomplete mutation in humanity’s ongoing attempt to articulate the sacred.

Gnosticism saw clearly that:
  • Power can masquerade as divinity
  • Consciousness matters
  • Awakening cannot be reduced to obedience
  • Mythic symbolism can diagnose alienation
Yet it failed to trust the very medium through which religious evolution unfolds: embodied, relational becoming.

By treating the world as a prison rather than a process, Gnosticism resolved tension through escape rather than transformation. It substituted interior illumination for communal repair. It preserved transcendence by abandoning history.

From a process-relational perspective, the enduring lesson of the Gnostic Gospels is therefore not their cosmology, but their religious protest - a protest that must be carried forward without repeating their metaphysical refusal of the world.

In the larger evolution of worship and religion, Gnosticism marks the moment when humanity learned that awakening alone is insufficient. What matters is how divine-awakening participates in the unfinished work of creation.

The mystery that endures is not how to escape the world,
but how the sacred continues to emerge within it.


~ Return to Introduction ~


Evolution of Worship & Religion


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Primary Texts

  • Robinson, James M. (ed.). The Nag Hammadi Library in English. HarperOne.

  • Meyer, Marvin (ed.). The Gnostic Gospels of Jesus. HarperOne.

  • Ehrman, Bart D. Lost Scriptures. Oxford University Press.

  • Kasser, Rodolphe et al. The Gospel of Judas. National Geographic.

Historical & Theological Studies

  • Pagels, Elaine. The Gnostic Gospels. Random House.

  • King, Karen L. What Is Gnosticism? Harvard University Press.

  • Williams, Michael Allen. Rethinking “Gnosticism”. Princeton University Press.

  • Turner, John D. Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Peeters.

Comparative & Process-Oriented Context

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. Macmillan.

  • Cobb, John B., Jr. Christ in a Pluralistic Age. Westminster Press.

  • Keller, Catherine. Cloud of the Impossible. Columbia University Press.

  • Oord, Thomas Jay. The Uncontrolling Love of God. IVP Academic.


Posted by at 0 comments

Evolution of Worship and Religions: Part V - Messiah: From Anointed Saviour to Suffering Sacred (14)



The Evolution of Worship and Religion:
From Cosmic Awe to Processual Faith

A Metamodern Journey through the History of the Sacred

MESSIAH: FROM ANOINTED SAVIOUR
TO SUFFERING SACRED
PART V - ESSAY  14

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

“The stone that the builders rejected
has become the Cornerstone.”
- Psalm 118:22



Essay 14

Messiah: From Anointed Saviour
to Suffering Sacred


Preface

The Evolution of Worship and Religion series has argued, from its earliest essays to its most recent conclusions, that religious belief is neither static nor arbitrary. Rather, it emerges, adapts, fractures, reforms, and reconstitutes itself in evolving response to historical pressures, social transformations, existential crises, and perceived encounters with the Sacred. Religious ideas do not float above history; they are formed within it. Nor are they merely reactive inventions; they are attempts - often fragile, at times profound - to interpret lived experience in light of sacred meaning.

Within this framework, doctrines, titles, rituals, and symbols are best understood as adaptive responses by religious communities - ways in which communities stabilize sacred meaning when confronted with uncertainty, trauma, hope, injustice, or transformation. This does not adjudicate the truth of religious claims in advance, but it does insist that beliefs take shape in dialogue with experience.

Few religious titles illustrate this evolutionary process more clearly than the title of Messiah. From its earliest functional use in ancient Israel, through its political expansion under Israel's monarchy, to its fragmentation after exile, its apocalyptic intensification in the Second Temple period, and its radical reinterpretation in early Christianity, the title Messiah serves as a living case study in how the Sacred is continuously reimagined.

This essay brings the series to a near closure by tracing the full historical, theological, and experiential evolution of Messiah - culminating not merely in a doctrine, but in a new vision of the Sacred itself.

Introduction: Why “Messiah” Matters

The word Messiah has become so thoroughly Christianized in modern discourse that its origins and transformations are often obscured. For many, “Messiah” functions as a theological shorthand for Jesus’ divinity. Yet historically, the term begins as something far more modest - and far more flexible.

At its core, Messiah names an anointed divine/sacred agent, one set apart for a specific divine/sacred task. Over the millennia, this task-bearing role has absorbed many configurations from political expectations, to national hopes, to moral longings, and finally, forming a cosmic significance of its own. By the time Christianity emerges, Messiah no longer refers merely to a role within Israel’s story, but to the axis upon which history itself is said to turn.

This essay will proceed in four movements:

  1. The historical evolution of Messiah within Israel’s religious imagination

  2. Jesus’ relationship to messianic expectation and his apocalyptic self-understanding

  3. The post-resurrection transformation of Messiah into Christological ontology

  4. The emergence of a radically new form of the Sacred - one defined by service, suffering, and self-giving love

Throughout, the guiding question is not simply what was believed, but why belief took the shape that it did.

I. The Origins of “Messiah”: Anointing without Metaphysics

Late Bronze Age – Early Iron Age (c. 1200–1000 BCE)

  • Emergence of early Israelite tribal society in Canaan
  • Development of ritual anointing practices in Near Eastern cultures
  • Māšîaḥ used functionally (priests, sacred agents, later kings)
  • No eschatological or metaphysical content attached to the term

Key Contextual Notes

  • Anointing practices widespread in ANE cultic and political life
  • Yahwistic religion still henotheistic or monolatrous in form
  • Sacred authority understood as delegated, not incarnated

The Hebrew term māšîaḥ (“anointed one”) originates within a ritual and functional context rather than a metaphysical one. Derived from the verb māšaḥ, “to anoint,” the designation refers to individuals set apart for a specific role within Israel’s communal life. The act of anointing symbolized authorization, selection, and empowerment for a task, not ontological transformation. When rendered in Greek as Christos, the term retains this instrumental meaning. At no point in its earliest usage does Messiah denote divinity, preexistence, or cosmic sovereignty.

In its initial form, messiahship is pragmatic observation by a community of its designated role-bearer. It marks a sacred personage as commissioned to act on behalf of the community under divine sanction. Meaning resides not in essence but in function. This distinction is critical, as later theological developments would increasingly conflate role with being, transforming a designation of purpose into a statement of ontology.

II. Messiah before Kingship: Charisma and Crisis

Iron Age I – Period of the Judges (c. 1200–1020 BCE)

  • Loose tribal confederation in Israel
  • Episodic leadership by judges (e.g., Deborah, Gideon, Samson)
  • Charismatic authority arises in response to crisis
  • No permanent messianic office or future-oriented expectation

Key Contextual Notes

  • Religious leadership overlaps with military necessity
  • The Sacred intervenes situationally rather than institutionally
  • Proto-messianic roles without formal terminology

In the pre-monarchic period of Israel’s history, leadership was neither hereditary nor institutionalized. The Book of Judges depicts a decentralized society responding to recurring crises through charismatic figures (Judges) raised up for specific moments of need. While these leaders are not formally called messiahs, they perform analogous roles: mediating deliverance, restoring order, and embodying divine responsiveness.

Authority during this period is episodic and temporary. Empowerment is situational rather than permanent, and no enduring office exists. The Sacred intervenes selectively, through individuals whose legitimacy arises from perceived effectiveness rather than formal status. In this context, proto-messianic leadership reflects emergency charisma rather than eschatological hope. There is no expectation of a future redeemer, only a recurring pattern of crisis and response.

III. The Royal Messiah: Kingship and Sacred Power

United Monarchy and Early Divided Kingdom (c. 1020–922 BCE)

  • Saul anointed king (c. 1020 BCE)
  • Davidic monarchy established (c. 1000 BCE)
  • Solomon’s reign and temple construction (c. 960 BCE)
  • Formalization of royal anointing

Key Contextual Notes

  • Messiah becomes dynastic and political
  • 2 Samuel 7 (Davidic Covenant) composed/traditioned
  • Kingship fused with divine sanction

The establishment of Israel's monarchy marks a decisive shift in the meaning of messiahship. With the anointing of Saul and, more significantly, David, the term messiah becomes associated with kingship, permanence, and dynastic continuity. Anointing now consecrates not merely a task, but an office. The king becomes “the Lord’s anointed,” a figure whose authority is both political and sacral.

The Davidic covenant further expands the messianic horizon. God’s promise of an enduring dynasty introduces an eschatological elasticity into the concept. Messiahship is no longer confined to present leadership but opens toward a future fulfillment. Nevertheless, the royal messiah remains fundamentally this-worldly. Expectations focus on land, security, justice, and national stability. The Sacred is imagined as endorsing power structures rather than subverting them.

IV. Exile and Second Temple Plurality

Neo-Assyrian & Neo-Babylonian Periods (c. 722–539 BCE)

  • Fall of Northern Kingdom (Israel) - 722 BCE
  • Fall of Jerusalem and First Temple - 586 BCE
  • Babylonian exile (586–539 BCE)

Key Contextual Notes

  • Collapse of royal theology
  • Emergence of prophetic reinterpretations
  • Messiah becomes deferred, moralized, idealized

Persian, Hellenistic, and Early Roman Periods (c. 539 BCE–30 CE)

  • Return from exile under Persian rule (539 BCE)
  • Temple rebuilt (516 BCE)
  • Hellenistic domination begins (332 BCE)
  • Hasmonean period (c. 140–37 BCE)
  • Roman rule established (63 BCE)

Key Contextual Notes

  • Multiple messianic models develop
  • Dead Sea Scrolls (c. 250 BCE–70 CE) attest to plural expectations
  • Messiah conceptualized as royal, priestly, prophetic, or apocalyptic

The Babylonian exile constitutes a profound rupture in Israel’s religious worldview. The destruction of the monarchy, the loss of land, and the dismantling of temple worship dismantle the institutional foundations of royal messianism. And yet, curiously, in the absence of a covenanted king, the messianic promise is neither abandoned nor fulfilled but deferred and reimagined.

Prophetic literature reflects this "Lost, but Not-Yet" tension. Images of a future anointed figure persist, but they are increasingly idealized and morally charged. The messiah becomes righteous rather than merely powerful, restorative rather than dominant. Yet these portrayals lack uniformity. Some emphasize suffering, others justice, still others shepherd-like care. The concept fragments, becoming a symbolic vessel capable of holding divergent hopes.

By the Second Temple period, messianic expectation is no longer singular. Multiple messianic models coexist: royal, priestly, prophetic, and apocalyptic. Rather than clarity, plurality defines the landscape into which Jesus emerges.

V. Jesus and Messiah: Reframing Expectation

Early 1st Century CE (c. 4 BCE–30 CE)

  • Birth of Jesus (traditionally c. 6-4 BCE)
  • Public ministry (c. 27-30 CE)
  • Teaching centered on Kingdom of God
  • Deliberate ambiguity around messianic title

Key Contextual Notes

  • Roman occupation intensifies political risk
  • Jesus’ use of indirect self-designation
  • Apocalyptic expectation widespread

Within this pluralistic environment, Jesus’ relationship to the title Messiah is marked by restraint and ambiguity. Historically, Jesus appears reluctant to claim the designation explicitly. This reticence is intelligible given the political volatility of messianic language under Roman occupation. Public identification as messiah risked immediate suppression and misinterpretation.

Instead, Jesus employs indirect self-reference, favoring terms such as “Son of Man” and framing his mission through parables and symbolic actions. His proclamation of the Kingdom of God situates his activity within an apocalyptic horizon, yet one that resists conventional expectations of violent deliverance. Jesus’ self-understanding appears rooted in a conviction of divine agency unfolding through non-coercive means.

VI. Apocalyptic Self-Understanding and the Reconfiguration of Messiah

Jesus’ message reflects an apocalyptic worldview common to late Second Temple Judaism. He anticipates imminent divine intervention, moral reversal, and the restoration of Israel. Yet his embodiment of this expectation is distinctive. Rather than assuming the role of conqueror or judge, Jesus redefines messiahship through service, humility, and solidarity with the marginalized.

This reinterpretation reaches its apex in his willingness to suffer and die. Within existing messianic frameworks, suffering signifies failure. A crucified messiah is a contradiction in terms. The execution of Jesus thus represents not only political elimination but theological negation. From the perspective of conventional expectation, messiahship ends at the cross.

VII. Death, Resurrection, and the Expansion of Meaning

Crucifixion and Early Jesus Movement (c. 30–50 CE)

  • Crucifixion under Pontius Pilate (c. 30 CE)
  • Resurrection experiences claimed by followers
  • Oral traditions and early confessions form

Key Contextual Notes

  • Messianic failure reinterpreted as divine vindication
  • Cross becomes central symbol
  • Suffering incorporated into messianic identity

The emergence of resurrection belief within the early Jesus movement transforms this negation into reinterpretation. The conviction that God has vindicated Jesus necessitates a radical reconfiguration of messiahship. The cross becomes not disproof but disclosure. Suffering is integrated into messianic identity rather than excluded from it.

This interpretive shift does not arise from doctrinal speculation alone but from communal experience under trauma. Faced with the death of their leader, early followers reorganize meaning around the belief that divine faithfulness persists beyond apparent defeat. Messiahship now encompasses endurance, fidelity, and transformative loss. Making one wonder if Israel's national experience of defeat and exile helped transform their relationship with God to one expansively preparatory in anticipation of a figure such as Jesus, who became their crucified Messiah (thus encapsulating Isaiah's suffering covenant community of Israel as prefigurement to the Christian figure of Christ=Messiah Jesus).

VIII. From Messiah to Christ: Ontological Development

Early Christian Development (c. 50–100 CE)

  • Pauline letters (c. 50-60 CE)
  • Gospel of Mark (c. 70 CE)
  • Gospels of Matthew and Luke (c. 80-90 CE)
  • Gospel of John (c. 90-100 CE)
Key Contextual Notes

  • Christology expands from function to being
  • Preexistence and cosmic mediation emerge
  • Messiah translated into Greco-Roman metaphysical categories

As the Christian movement expands beyond its Jewish context into the Greco-Roman world, the messianic title undergoes further transformation. Messiah becomes Christ, and functional designation gradually acquires ontological depth in a backward theologic expansion of Jesus as the Incarnate God and Second Personage of the divine Trinity in later church orthodoxy. The central question shifts from vocational identity to metaphysical status. Jesus is no longer merely the anointed agent of God’s purposes but becomes the locus of divine presence itself.

Resurrection belief catalyzes this expansion. Claims of exaltation, preexistence, and cosmic mediation emerge as theological responses to the conviction that Jesus’ significance transcends past historical limitation. Messiahship evolves from role to being, from instrument to incarnation. The Sacred is now imagined as personally embodied rather than distantly authorized.

IX. A New Vision of the Sacred

Post-Temple Christianity and Theological Consolidation (c. 70–200 CE)

  • Destruction of Second Temple (70 CE)
  • Separation of Judaism and Christianity accelerates
  • Development of worship centered on Christ
  • Sacred reimagined as vulnerable and participatory

Key Contextual Notes

  • Messiah theology now independent of temple or land
  • Divine Suffering of the Sacred becomes a new theological center
  • Religious identity is reshaped around cruciform meaning

This Christological development represents one of the most consequential transformations in the history of religious thought. The Sacred, previously associated with power, transcendence, and invulnerability, is reimagined as relational, vulnerable, and participatory. In Christian belief, God does not remain untouched by history but enters it, absorbs its violence, and responds through self-giving love.

Whether or not one affirms the metaphysical truth of these claims, their religious significance is undeniable. The Christian conception of an Incarnate (and incarnating) Messiah inaugurates a new symbolic grammar in which suffering is not a sign of divine absence but a medium of divine presence. The Sacred is no longer defined by distance from human fragility but by intimate solidarity with it.

Conclusion

Late Antiquity Trajectory (c. 200–400 CE)

  • Christological debates (2nd-4th centuries)
  • Councils of Nicaea (325 CE) and Chalcedon (451 CE)
  • Messiah fully integrated into Trinitarian doctrine

Key Contextual Notes

  • Functionally-driven messiah becomes ontological Christ
  • Sacred fixed in dogma, though born from adaptation
  • Evolution of worship culminates in creedal Christianity

The evolution of Messiah from an anointed functionary to a suffering, risen Christ exemplifies the adaptive dynamics of religious meaning. This underlines the significance of a processual theology over that of a fixed theology bounded by time, culture, distance, and incongruency.

Across Israel’s history, messianic expectation responds to changing circumstances: political formation, institutional collapse, existential crisis, and communal trauma. In Christianity, these adaptations culminate in a radical redefinition of the Sacred itself.

To confess Jesus as Messiah is not merely to affirm a historical claim but to participate in a transformed understanding of power, agency, and divine involvement. Messiah no longer guarantees deliverance from suffering but reveals the possibility of sacred meaning within the experience of failure and suffering.

This shift marks a decisive moment in the evolution of worship and religion, where belief becomes a vehicle not of control, but of enduring hope shaped by love, vulnerability, and relational presence.


Messiah

The gods once ruled from distant heights,
Untouched by dust, disillusion, or pain.
But this Messiah-God knelt low,
incarnating flesh and breath,
And learned the weight of name.

No thunder spoke, no sword was raised,
No crown of gold was won acclaimed.
The Sacred bled, was bound, was lost -
And rose from grave not as Conqueror,
But as one who stays, abides, and saves.


R.E. Slater
December 22, 2025
@copyright R.E. Slater Publications
all rights reserved




~ Continue to Part V, Essay 15 ~


Evolution of Worship & Religion


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Hebrew Bible, Israelite Religion, and Early Messianism

  • Assmann, Jan. The Price of Monotheism. Stanford University Press, 2010.

  • Brueggemann, Walter. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Fortress Press, 1997.

  • Collins, John J. The Scepter and the Star: Messianism in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. 2nd ed., Eerdmans, 2010.

  • Cross, Frank Moore. Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic. Harvard University Press, 1973.

  • Hanson, Paul D. The Dawn of Apocalyptic. Fortress Press, 1975.

  • Smith, Mark S. The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel. 2nd ed., Eerdmans, 2002.

  • Wright, Jacob L. Why the Bible Began: An Alternative History of Scripture and Its Origins. Cambridge University Press, 2023.

Second Temple Judaism and Apocalyptic Context

  • Boccaccini, Gabriele. Beyond the Essene Hypothesis. Eerdmans, 1998.

  • Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Imagination. 3rd ed., Eerdmans, 2016.

  • Neusner, Jacob. Judaism in the Beginning of Christianity. Fortress Press, 1984.

  • Nickelsburg, George W. E. Ancient Judaism and Christian Origins. Fortress Press, 2003.

  • VanderKam, James C. An Introduction to Early Judaism. Eerdmans, 2001.

The Historical Jesus

  • Allison, Dale C. Jesus of Nazareth: Millenarian Prophet. Fortress Press, 1998.

  • Borg, Marcus J. Jesus: A New Vision. HarperOne, 1994.

  • Crossan, John Dominic. The Historical Jesus: The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant. HarperSanFrancisco, 1991.

  • Ehrman, Bart D. Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press, 1999.

  • Sanders, E. P. Jesus and Judaism. Fortress Press, 1985.

  • Wright, N. T. Jesus and the Victory of God. Fortress Press, 1996.

Messiah, Christology, and Early Christian Thought

  • Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the God of Israel. Eerdmans, 2008.

  • Bultmann, Rudolf. Theology of the New Testament. Scribner, 1951.

  • Dunn, James D. G. Christology in the Making. 2nd ed., Eerdmans, 1996.

  • Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Eerdmans, 2003.

  • Käsemann, Ernst. Essays on New Testament Themes. SCM Press, 1964.

  • McGrath, James F. The Only True God: Early Christian Monotheism in Its Jewish Context. University of Illinois Press, 2009.

Religion as Adaptation, Meaning-Making, and Experience

  • Berger, Peter L. The Sacred Canopy. Anchor Books, 1967.

  • Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane. Harcourt, 1959.

  • Geertz, Clifford. “Religion as a Cultural System.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, 1973.

  • Luckmann, Thomas. The Invisible Religion. Macmillan, 1967.

  • Ricoeur, Paul. Figuring the Sacred. Fortress Press, 1995.

  • Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Belknap Press, 2007.

Power, Suffering, and the Reimagining of the Sacred

  • Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.

  • Moltmann, Jürgen. The Crucified God. Fortress Press, 1974.

  • Niebuhr, Reinhold. The Nature and Destiny of Man. Scribner, 1941.

  • Ruether, Rosemary Radford. Faith and Fratricide. Seabury Press, 1974.

  • Sobrino, Jon. Christology at the Crossroads. Orbis Books, 1978.

Meta-Theoretical and Process-Adjacent Works (Optional Bridge Forward)

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. Macmillan, 1926.

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. Corrected ed., Free Press, 1978.

  • Cobb, John B., and David Ray Griffin. Process Theology. Westminster Press, 1976.

  • Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery. Fortress Press, 2008.

  • Clayton, Philip. The Problem of God in Modern Thought. Eerdmans, 2000.

Primary Sources (for Reference)

  • The Hebrew Bible (Masoretic Text; NRSV or JPS recommended)

  • The Septuagint

  • The Dead Sea Scrolls (trans. García Martínez)

  • The New Testament (critical editions: NA28 / UBS5)



Posted by at 0 comments
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)