Process Theology & Relativity: Reading Einstein Through Whitehead

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Process Theology & Relativity

Reading Einstein Through Whitehead

A Geometric Expression of Processual Reality

in a Geometry of Becoming

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT 5

Introduction

Whitehead's process philosophy finds its grounding in process theology, and process theology finds its source in process philosophy. The one goes with the other. Similarly, when exploring processual reality, the sciences themselves are encircled within this reality, a reality which finds its most radical and ultimate expression in the quantum sciences.

---

Relativity in Processual Perspective

Einstein’s relativity marked a decisive break with the older metaphysical assumptions of timeless absolutes. Time and space were no longer rigid containers but dynamic, interwoven dimensions of a relational cosmos. Events in relativity are situated within light cones, connected by causal structures, and shaped by the curvature of spacetime itself. This discovery reflects the same metaphysical truth Whitehead articulated:

reality is not a collection of static substances, but a web of events, each

inheriting from the past and creating the conditions for the future.

In special relativity, perspective matters. Observers in different frames of reference experience time and simultaneity differently. In process thought, each actual occasion also has its unique perspective - its way of prehending and integrating the world. Both physics and philosophy converge on a world where reality is not fixed and absolute but perspectival and relational.

General relativity extends this insight by showing how matter and energy shape spacetime, and how that spacetime guides matter in return. This reciprocity mirrors Whitehead’s principle of creative advance, where events both condition and are conditioned, both inherit and contribute. Processual theology then may metaphorically state a divine interplay between God and creation: 

God's relational participation in creation is not the imposition of power

from outside, but a persuasive companionship from within, guiding the

world toward greater harmony, intensity, and beauty.

Relativity also places limits on what is possible. Light cones define the boundaries of causal influence, setting the horizon for future potential. Whitehead’s process metaphysics offers a parallel:

past events constrain the present, but within those constraints novelty emerges.

For theology, this reinforces a picture of divine action that is not coercive but invitational - that God works within the real conditions of the cosmos, opening possibilities but never violating the relational integrity of creation (sic, for example, "biblical" miracles must work within creation, not separately in violation to creation or scientific observations).

Finally, the mathematics of relativity - elegant geometries, curvature tensors, and invariant intervals - reveal the deep rationality of the cosmos. Whitehead’s concept of eternal objects helps us see these as the realm of divine potentialities: abstract patterns that become concrete only when woven into actualizing events. Thus,

relativity becomes not only a scientific description but a theological witness

to a world created for intelligibility, relationality, and processual becoming.

---

Conclusion

If one is to come to the idea of a Creator who authored creation, or to the idea of faith and religion as expressed in a variety of ways by the world’s global religions, or to the Christian faith as a singular expression of God and creation, then one’s theology, beliefs, faith, and living acts must correspond to the processual reality that uniquely expresses the God of that creation. To behold God is to behold God’s processual nature and attributes, expressed through divine creative acts upon an infinite cosmos with its infinite processual traits.

Everywhere one looks - whether in relativity’s spacetime curvatures or in quantum physic's probabilistic indeterminacies - can be found processual acts of relational dynamism evolving in freewill struggle towards harmony and balance. Humans participate in this cosmic rhythm when they live ethically with one another when creating acts of generative goodness, equality, justice, and love. All processual traits of a processual reality that carries within it worth, value, and the divine lure toward beauty. The call to weave novelty, harmony, sacred dignity, and love into every becoming of an unfolding cosmos.

The Sacred Geometry of Becoming

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

  Everywhere one looks -  

      in relativity’s curving spacetime,

    in quantum’s trembling veil of chance -

   processual acts stir,

  dynamism unfolds,

 relational currents rise,

a freewill struggle lifts

        toward balance,

     toward harmony.

         We are woven into this rhythm.

      Our lives a chord within the cosmic score,

    when we live lovingly with one another,

   when we shape acts of generative goodness,

  when we breathe equality into being,

 when we walk the paths of justice,

when we dare the work of love.

      These are the traits of reality itself:

        worth that is not borrowed,

          value that is not imposed,

             a cosmos seeded with beauty,

                God’s quiet lure toward wholeness,

                   singing in every becoming.

---

A SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE

Einstein's Relativity Theory Visualized & Expressed Geometrically

Question to ChatGPT:

Is it possible to either visualize or mathematically represent geometrically Einstein's Relativity Theory?

ChatGPT said:

Yes — Einstein’s relativity can be expressed both visually and mathematically in geometric terms. In fact, geometry is at the very heart of relativity. Here’s how:

---

1. Special Relativity: Minkowski Spacetime

• Hermann Minkowski (1908) reformulated Einstein’s special relativity as a geometric theory.

• Instead of thinking in terms of separate 3D space + time, spacetime is a 4-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean geometry with coordinates $(t, x, y, z)$.

• The “distance” (interval) between events is given by the metric:

  $$s^2 = -c^2 t^2 + x^2 + y^2 + z^2$$
  where 
  c is the speed of light.

• Visualization: In 2D (one space + one time dimension), this looks like a light cone diagram. The cone divides possible motion into:

  • Inside: events reachable by slower-than-light signals.

  • On the cone: light rays.

  • Outside: events that can’t be causally connected.

---

2. General Relativity: Curved Spacetime Geometry

• General Relativity extends this idea: spacetime itself is curved by mass and energy.

• The geometry is described by a metric tensor $g_{\mu\nu}$, which defines local intervals:

  $$ds^2 = g_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu$$

• Einstein’s field equations relate curvature to matter/energy:

  $$G_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}$$

  where:

  • $G_{\mu\nu}$ = Einstein tensor (curvature of spacetime),

  • $T_{\mu\nu}$ = energy-momentum tensor,

  • $\Lambda$ = cosmological constant.

• Visualization: Curved spacetime is often pictured as a “rubber sheet” with masses creating indentations. More rigorously:

  • Geodesics (the straightest possible paths in curved geometry) describe how planets orbit or how light bends near stars.

  • Light cones tilt in curved spacetime, showing how gravity changes causality structure.

---

3. Geometric Representations

• Light Cones: Local causal structure, showing what is possible within relativity.

• Geodesics: Worldlines of free-falling particles, akin to “straight lines” in curved spacetime.

• Embedding Diagrams: 2D surfaces (like Schwarzschild “wormhole” diagrams) to show curvature in a lower dimension.

• Spacetime Diagrams: Minkowski diagrams for special relativity, Penrose diagrams for black holes and cosmology.

---

✅ In summary:
Einstein’s relativity is fundamentally a theory of geometry. Special relativity uses flat Minkowski geometry; general relativity uses curved Riemannian geometry (pseudo-Riemannian, to be precise). These can be represented both mathematically (metric tensors, geodesics, curvature) and visually (light cones, warped grids, spacetime diagrams).

---

Here’s a curated selection of visual aids to help you grasp the geometric beauty of Einstein’s Relativity:

• Minkowski Light Cone Diagram (flat spacetime / special relativity)

• Spacetime Curvature Illustration (rubber‑sheet analogy for general relativity)

• Penrose Diagram (causal structure with infinities compactified)

• Embedding Diagram (visualizing curves in spacetime using surfaces)

Minkowski Light Cone (flat spacetime / special relativity)

Spacetime Curvature Illustration (rubber‑sheet analogy for general relativity)

Penrose Diagram (causal structure with infinities compactified)

Embedding Diagram (visualizing curves in spacetime using surfaces)

---

Essential Online Resources

1. Spacetime (Minkowski) Diagrams

• Wikipedia (Spacetime diagram)
  Clear introduction to Minkowski diagrams used in special relativity—useful for understanding Lorentz transformations and how light cones are drawn on them. Adobe Stock+15Medium+15Medium+15Wikipedia+12Wikipedia+12Binghamton University+12Reddit+1Wikipedia+2ResearchGate+2

• LibreTexts (Spacetime Diagrams)
  A step-by-step guide to graphing spacetime events, worldlines, and interpretations of time dilation and length contraction. Physics LibreTexts

• MathAdam (Medium)
  Offers vivid diagrams showing how different inertial frames tilt in Minkowski diagrams—great for visual learners. ResearchGate+15Medium+15Medium+15

2. General Relativity Visualizations

• Reddit on Elastic Sheet Model
  A popular intuitive model:

  “I always found the elastic sheet model … makes acceleration due to gravity look more intuitive.”
  arXiv+8Reddit+8ResearchGate+8

• General-Relativistic Visualization (pdf)
  Technical but fascinating: how to trace light geodesics in curved spacetimes—useful for simulations and ray-tracing visualizations. Physics Stack Exchange+15Computer Science+15CiteSeerX+15

3. Causal Structure & Penrose Diagrams

• Wikipedia (Penrose diagram)
  Shows how spacetime regions—including infinities—can be compactly represented while preserving causal relationships. Often used in black hole and cosmological contexts. Binghamton University+3Wikipedia+3Reddit+3

• ResearchGate Image
  The visual I included above gives a concrete example of a Penrose diagram of Minkowski spacetime. ResearchGate+1

4. Mathematical & Teaching Resources

• StackExchange (Recommended GR Books)
  Mentions accessible textbooks like Spacetime and Geometry by Sean Carroll and A First Course in General Relativity by Schutz—excellent for mathematical depth. Computer Science+14Physics Stack Exchange+14Reddit+14

• Sector Models (Regge Calculus Approach)
  A conceptual tool for building up curved spacetimes from flat pieces—great for teaching and intuitive insight. OAPT Newsletter+14arXiv+14Physics LibreTexts+14
  It's also part of a digital learning environment called V‑SeMo, which allows interactive exploration of spacetimes and light deflection. arXiv

• Pictorial Introduction to Differential Geometry
  No heavy equations—uses pictures to ease into the geometry underpinning relativity (especially Maxwell's equations, but helpful context for GR). arXiv

---

Summary Table

Type	Source & Links	Highlights
Minkowski Diagrams	Wikipedia, LibreTexts, MathAdam	Visualize worldlines, light cones, Lorentz boosts
General Relativity Visuals	Reddit, GR Visualization (pdf)	Rubber-sheet intuitions, geodesic tracing
Penrose Diagrams	Wikipedia + Image from ResearchGate	Causal structure, infinities, black holes
Educational & Math Tools	Carroll, Schutz books; Sector Models; Visual guides	Deep understanding via textbooks and models

---

A PROCESSUAL PERSPECTIVE

Question:

From the above discussion, mathematics, diagrams is there anything that can be said about process philosophy or theology??

ChatGPT said:

Yes — relativity’s geometry of spacetime actually resonates in interesting ways with process philosophy and theology. Let me draw some connections for you:

---

1. Spacetime as Processual Reality

• In Einstein’s theories, events (not static “things”) are the fundamental units of reality.

• This aligns closely with Whitehead’s actual occasions in process philosophy: reality is a web of happenings, not enduring substances.

• Both frameworks see becoming and relation (events connecting through spacetime / occasions prehending one another) as more fundamental than fixed being.

👉 Process theology can read relativity as confirmation that “creation” is not made of Plato's "eternal/transcendent ideals" (timeless, perfect, changeless essences) nor Aristotle's "fixed, immanent essences" but of Whitehead's relational potentials actualized in ongoing, dynamic, and continuously unfolding processual events woven into a relational spacetime.

Einstein’s relativity transformed our view of space and time from fixed absolutes into a unified, dynamic spacetime fabric. Events, not static substances, are the fundamental constituents of reality, and their relations are what give rise to the geometry of spacetime itself. This resonates deeply with Whitehead’s notion of actual occasions - reality as a web of happenings that inherit, transform, and contribute to the ongoing advance of the cosmos.

For process theology, this marks a decisive break with older metaphysical assumptions. Creation is not made of Plato’s eternal essences (timeless, perfect, changeless ideals), nor of Aristotle’s fixed essences (forms embedded in substances). Rather, creation is constituted by Whitehead’s relational potentials (eternal objects=potentials), which are actualized in processual events woven into relational spacetime. Reality, therefore, is not timeless or static but eventful, relational, and becoming.

---

2. Relativity of Perspective & Relational Knowing

• Special relativity shows that motion, time, and simultaneity depend on the observer’s frame of reference.

• This echoes process philosophy’s emphasis on perspectival knowing: every actual occasion integrates reality from its standpoint.

• In theology, this means God’s relation to the world is contextual and relational, not imposed from outside but engaged from within.

👉 Relativity strengthens the idea of a relationally immanent God who encounters the world within its own unfolding or evolving processes rather than transcendentally dictating from  above timeless ideals and absolutes from beyond creation (the cosmos,  world, nature, us).

More specifically, process theology portrays God not as a distant, timeless Absolute standing outside creation, but as a relational presence who shares in the world’s unfolding. Just as spacetime adapts and responds to what inhabits it, God is envisioned as responsive, participatory, and co-creative - encountering creation in its processes rather than dictating from beyond them.

Thus, relativity strengthens the plausibility of a theology where God’s action is not imposed from a timeless, fixed realm (à la Plato or classical theism), but lived within the evolving spacetime fabric of creation. God is dynamically present in the very same relational processes that constitute reality itself (something akin to the idea that God is the DNA of a freewill cosmos birthed with agency.)

---

3. Curvature as Creative Advance

• In general relativity, matter and energy shape spacetime geometry, and spacetime guides the motion of matter:

  $$\text{<i><span style="font-family: georgia;">Matter tells spacetime how to curve, spacetime tells matter how to move.</span></i>}$$

• Whitehead’s “creative advance into novelty” is similar: each actual occasion both inherits the past (shaped by prior reality) and contributes novelty that reshapes the future.

• Theology can view this as a divine-cosmic synergy: God does not override the world but lures it toward harmony, just as spacetime and matter co-determine paths.

In general relativity, matter and energy curve spacetime, and that curvature guides how matter and light move. This dynamic interplay mirrors Whitehead’s vision of the creative advance into novelty: where every event is both conditioned by what has come before and provides a fresh contribution to what follows. The cosmos is not a static order but a living rhythm of influence and response, in which God participates as the lure toward harmony and novelty. 

This theologic idea is captured in the science of evolution where reality is a rhythm of influence and response, shaping and reshaping itself in a continuous dance. Consequently, theology may be seen in this interplay as a metaphor for the divine-cosmic relationship. God does not stand over creation as a unilateral force but works within it as a persuasive lure toward harmony, beauty, and intensity of experience. Just as spacetime curvature emerges from mass-energy, so the divine call emerges from the world’s actualities, inviting creation forward without coercion. Relativity thus strengthens the vision of a participatory God whose creativity is relationally embedded in the very fabric of cosmic advance.

---

4. Light Cones and Limits of Possibility

• In relativity, light cones define what is possible for any event - its causal reach.

• Whitehead speaks of objective immortality: past events set the conditions for future ones, delimiting what is possible yet leaving room for novelty.

• Theologically, this mirrors freedom with limits: God’s action is not coercion but persuasive within the causal structure of creation.

👉Relativity’s causal cones can be read as metaphors for God’s persuasive = luring power - opening pathways but never violating the relational structure of reality.

In relativity, light cones define the causal boundaries of every event. They set the horizon of what is possible - what can be influenced and what lies forever beyond reach. This echoes Whitehead’s idea of objective immortality: every event, once actualized, becomes a fixed condition for the future, delimiting possibilities while still allowing for novelty.

Theologically, this provides a model for how God’s action operates. Divine creativity does not erase causal structures but works persuasively within them. God opens pathways and possibilities, yet respects the relational integrity of creation. Freedom and structure go hand in hand: the past sets the conditions, but within those conditions, new futures emerge.

---

5. Eternal Objects and Mathematical Structures

• Relativity relies on elegant geometric forms (metrics, tensors, symmetries) that make sense of becoming.

• Whitehead would call these eternal objects/potentials - potential forms that actual occasions realize.

• Theology can see divine rationality as dwelling in these mathematical structures that allow the cosmos to unfold intelligibly.

Relativity’s mathematics - spacetime intervals, curvature tensors, geodesics - reveals the profound rationality of the cosmos. These abstract patterns resemble Whitehead’s eternal objects: pure potentials that find concreteness only when actualized in events. Just as geometry makes sense of becoming in physics, eternal objects make sense of becoming in metaphysics.

Theologically, this affirms that God’s rationality is not remote but woven into the intelligible structures of creation. Mathematics and geometry become witnesses to divine presence, not as static ideals but as living potentials for order and harmony within process. The cosmos is intelligible because it is relationally grounded, shaped by potentials that invite actualization in the ongoing advance of creation.

---

✨ Summary: Relativity as Process Metaphor

• Physics: Events, spacetime, curvature, geodesics, causal structure.

• Process Philosophy: Actual occasions, concrescence, creative advance, relational perspective.

• Process Theology: God as relational companion, lure toward harmony, presence in becoming.

Thus, Einstein’s relativity doesn’t just describe physics — it also visually and mathematically reinforces a process worldview where reality is interdependent, relational, and ever-becoming.

Lacanian Psychoanalysis & Process Theology: Knots of Becoming

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Lacanian Psychoanalysis & Process Theology

Faith as Knots of Becoming

A Public and Philosophical Reflection

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT 5

---

Illustration

The diagram above illustrates how all human constructions, whether in the areas of religion, science, philosophy, art, politics, economics, law, technology, culture, ethics, education, or myth, all exist within Processual Reality (the Cosmos).

• The golden background signifies that reality itself is processual, always in motion, becoming, and transformation.

• Each circle represents a human construction. Some overlap more strongly with elements of processual reality while others remain more distinct.

• Not every construction consciously teaches or embodies process, yet all live within it and are ultimately shaped by it.

Insight:

Should reality be processual, then all human traditions, institutions, and ways of knowing do not exist outside of process; but are expressions within it. Some a little, some more. Some are open to processual becoming, while others resist, distort, or only partially reveal it.

Theologically:

From a process-theological perspective, all human constructions live within the larger horizon of God’s processual reality. The golden field of becoming is not merely an abstract metaphysic but the living presence of divine creativity that sustains and lures the world toward beauty, truth, and goodness.

Religion, science, art, politics, and every sphere of human life are caught up in this flow: some reflect it more openly, others obscure or resist it. Yet none are outside of it. Just as no creature can step beyond God’s presence, no construction of human meaning can escape the encompassing process of divine life.

The task of theology, then, is to awaken communities to their embeddedness within this divine process and to guide them in reshaping their practices so they might better align with God’s ongoing work of renewal and transformation.

---

Who Is Jacques Lacan? 

Wikipedia - Jacques Marie Émile Lacan (1901–1981) was a French psychoanalyst and psychiatrist. Described as "the most controversial psycho-analyst since Freud," ...his work made a significant impact on continental philosophy and cultural theory in areas such as post-structuralism, critical theory, feminist theory and film theory, as well as on the practice of psychoanalysis itself.

Lacan took up and discussed the whole range of Freudian concepts, emphasizing the philosophical dimension of Freud's thought and applying concepts derived from structuralism in linguistics and anthropology to its development in his own work, which he would further augment by employing formulae from predicate logic and topology. Taking this new direction, and introducing controversial innovations in clinical practice, led to expulsion for Lacan and his followers from the International Psychoanalytic Association. In consequence, Lacan went on to establish new psychoanalytic institutions to promote and develop his work, which he declared to be a "return to Freud", in opposition to prevalent trends in psychology and institutional psychoanalysis collusive of adaptation to social norms.

---

Wikipedia - Lacanianism or Lacanian psychoanalysis is a theoretical system initiated by the work of Jacques Lacan from the 1950s to the 1980s. It is a theoretical approach that attempts to explain the mind, behaviour, and culture through a structuralist and post-structuralist extension of classical psychoanalysis. Lacanian perspectives contend that the human mind is structured by the world of language, known as the Symbolic. They stress the importance of desire, which is conceived of as perpetual and impossible to satisfy. Contemporary Lacanianism is characterised by a broad range of thought and extensive debate among Lacanians.

Lacanianism has been particularly influential in post-structuralism, literary theory, and feminist theory, as well as in various branches of critical theory, including queer theory. Equally, it has been criticised by the post-structuralists Deleuze and Guattari and by various feminist theorists. Outside France, it has had limited clinical influence on psychiatry. There is a Lacanian strand in left-wing politics, including Saul Newman's and Duane Rousselle's post-anarchism, Louis Althusser's structural Marxism, and the works of Slavoj Žižek and Alain Badiou. Influential figures in Lacanianism include Slavoj Žižek, Julia Kristeva and Serge Leclaire.

---

Introduction

Many people feel a tension in their faith: the comfort of tradition on one hand, and the unsettling experiences of doubt, desire, or mystery on the other. Some try to resolve this by clinging to rigid doctrine, while others abandon structure altogether. But perhaps there are deeper ways of understanding this tension - ways that allow us to hold both stability and disruption together without forcing one to win out over the other. Here, two very different traditions - that of Lacanian psychoanalysis and Process Theology - which may offer us helpful metaphors.

---

Lacanian Psychoanalysis

I

Traditional, confessional forms of Christianity largely operate within the imaginary and symbolic registers:

• the imaginary with its stabilising images of faith, belonging, and spiritual identity;

• the symbolic with its frameworks of doctrine, dogma, and ecclesial authority that promise coherence and security.

These structures are not without value as they provide orientation, they anchor communities and preserve wisdom across generations.

And yet, they also impose limits, smoothing over the fractures of existence and demanding a wholeness of belief that can never fully correspond to lived experience.

In contrast, the mystical and radical currents of Christianity are more closely aligned with the register of the Real. Here, faith is not about symbolic mastery or imaginary wholeness, but about encounters with excess, rupture, and the unspeakable. 

The Real is that which breaks through the surface of Christian language and ritual:

• the uncontainable erotic charge of desire,
• the wound of divine absence,
• the abyssal depth of God’s apophatic unknowability.

It is precisely here that Christianity becomes most alive, most destabilising, and paradoxically most transformative.

II

The challenge, then, is how to live as authentic subjects of faith today without lapsing into two extremes: on the one hand,

• conformity to rigid dogma that represses the disruptive power of the Real (dogma, apologetics, defenses of the Christian faith);

and, on the other,

• a perpetual deconstruction that dissolves all forms, leaving faith fragmented and unmoored (contemporary, progressive, radical movements).

III

Perhaps what Lacan offers through the notion of the sinthome is a way of navigating between these poles.

The sinthome functions as a singular, flexible knot — a way of binding the subject that resists both absolute rigidity and total disintegration. Unlike the symptom, which demands interpretation, the sinthome stabilises by its very opacity.

• It does not resolve contradiction but provides a way of living with it, weaving together the imaginary, symbolic, and real into a fragile but enduring knot.

• Applied theologically, the sinthome suggests that faith is not about final coherence or endless critique but about sustaining a unique, idiosyncratic mode of inhabiting the mystery of God.

• Such a theology would not attempt to master the Real but to hold it and to give it a place without reducing it.

The sinthome then is not about balance in the sense of compromise, but about a deeper equilibrium: an optimum disequilibrium that allows for stability without closure, openness without collapse.

In this sense, theology becomes less a fortress of dogma and more a dynamic structure loosely held, adaptable, porous to change yet still strong enough to sustain subjects in their singular, faithful knots.

---

Comparisons with Process Theology

Process thought (sic, Whitehead, Cobb, Keller, Suchocki) is not a psychoanalytic language but a philosophic metaphysical grammar inspired by philosopher Alfred North Whitehead. It starts from a different place but resonates strongly with Lacan’s concerns (that is, Lacanian thought contains processual aspects within it).

To begin with, Process thought sees all of reality as an ongoing becoming, where each moment gathers up the past and pushes into new possibilities. God is not a distant ruler but a companion who invites the world toward healing, beauty, and deeper connection. Process theology acknowledges that doctrines, rituals, and images are lures for feeling which provide provisional religious/faith forms through which communities might stabilize their identity.

Where Lacan sees rupture and impossibility, Process sees creativity — the inexhaustible, unobjectifiable depth of reality from which novelty arises. Lacan's Real's traumatic rupture corresponds, mutatis mutandis (sic, all necessary changes having been made; without affecting the necessary changes), to Process’ uncaused creativity - that which escapes system and becomes the ground of transformation.

• The Lacanian sinthome knots dissonance registers so that the subject can endure.

• In Process terms, concrescence weaves disparate prehensions into a coherent actual occasion.

• Both are knottings, but Lacan’s is stabilizing a wound, while Whitehead’s is the positive creative advance into novelty.

Processually, the subject of faith, then, is not a fortress (rigid Symbolic) nor chaos (disintegrating Real) but a fragile, porous, processual knotting of life - open to rupture, yet always re-forming through the lure of God’s call toward greater relational wholeness.

---

Summary

An Everyday View of Lacanism

In everyday faith, people, and their faith traditions, often hold images of stability and belonging - comforting pictures of God as a loving parent, and of safe communities offering strong, fortress-like foundations. Within these languages are doctrines, rituals, and authority structures which bring order and coherence to that which doesn't provide order and coherence. These elements are not without value. They preserve wisdom across generations and help people orient their lives.

But life often doesn’t fit neatly into such boxes. Doubt, longing, or the sense of God’s absence can break through, leaving believers unsettled. The mystery of God’s absence, the ache of desire, the intensity of mystical experience - these break through and refuse to be contained by familiar symbols. For some, these moments feel like rupture or even crisis. For others, they are the very heart of a living faith.

The challenge is not to erase such experiences but to carry them. Faith is less about having all the answers than about finding ways to hold the contradictions together - to live with the wound without being undone by it.

The French thinker Jacques Lacan described human experience through three “registers”:

• The Imaginary: the comforting pictures of wholeness, belonging, and identity that we carry.

• The Symbolic: the language, rules, doctrines, and structures which guide us and give order.

• The Real: the unmanageable disruptions, ruptures, and mysteries that cannot be neatly explained away.

When applied to Christianity, the Imaginary includes comforting pictures of God and community, while the Symbolic is found in creeds, doctrines, and church authority. Both have value, but they can only take us so far. For many people, the most profound experiences of faith come when the Real breaks through: the mystery of God’s absence, the intensity of spiritual desire, or the transformative shock of the Spirit. These are encounters that no doctrine or image can contain.

Faith, in this light, isn’t about erasing contradictions. It’s about learning to live with them. Lacan described the sinthome, a kind of knot that holds the Imaginary, Symbolic, and Real together - not by solving contradictions but by letting people carry them without falling apart. For faith, this means we don’t need to resolve every doubt or contradiction; instead, we learn to inhabit them in a way that sustains life. Faith then can work like that knot, giving us a way to keep going even when life doesn’t fully make sense.

---

An Everyday View of Processualism (Process Theology)

Process Theology begins from another angle. It sees life as constantly unfolding, with each moment shaped by the past but also opening toward the future. Each moment of life gathers up the past - its joys, wounds, and contradictions - and then moves forward into new possibilities. God isn’t a distant ruler but a companion who works with the world, always inviting us toward greater healing, justice, and beauty.

What feels like rupture or loss isn’t wasted - it can become the seeds of transformation. Process thought calls this weaving together of experiences concrescence: the way different strands of life come together into a new whole.

Pragmatically, faith is not about holding still or demanding certainty. It is about moving forward, weaving contradictions into something more, and trusting God’s invitation into life’s ongoing becoming.

---

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Together: A Fragile but Living Knot

Seen this way, faith is neither a fortress of certainty nor a sea of endless dissolution. It is a knotting - a fragile, provisional way of holding together images, doctrines, and mysteries so that life can continue to unfold. The knot is never final, but it can be strong enough to sustain us and open enough to let us change.

Though Lacan and Process approach faith from different angles, they complement one another beautifully:

• Lacan reminds us that wounds and contradictions never fully disappear; they must be carried.

• Process reminds us that these very wounds can become part of the world’s creative advance into something new.

Faith, then, is not a fortress of certainty nor a dissolving sea of doubts. It is a knotting - a way of holding together image, doctrine, and mystery so that life can continue to unfold. It is fragile, yes, but enduring; difficult, yes, but profoundly alive.

And from the processual perspective, faith is not about erasing contradictions but about weaving them into something new. What feels like rupture or loss can become the raw material for transformation. Process Theology calls this ongoing weaving concrescence - the way disparate experiences come together into a fresh, living whole. Rather than trying to close off mystery, faith moves forward with it, trusting God’s lure toward new life.

In Process terms, faith is always "in the process" of becoming.more than it once was.

---

Conclusion

For churches and communities today, this means resisting two temptations: clinging too tightly to rigid systems that silence disruption, or abandoning all structure so that nothing holds together. The challenge is to create spaces where faith can be both stable and open: knots that are firm enough to hold us, yet loose enough to let the Spirit move.

In this light, the most authentic faith is not one that claims perfect answers, but one that continues to be re-knotted again and again—each time with greater honesty, compassion, and openness to the mystery of God.

In short: Lacan teaches us to live with wounds that never fully close; Process teaches us to co-create beauty even out of those wounds. Faith may require both: a sinthomatic knot that steadies us and a concrescent advance that moves us forward.

---