What Is Process Religion?

https://ctr4process.org/programs/process-faith/

What Is Process Religion?

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

Introduction: Religion in Process

Religion has always been humanity’s attempt to orient itself within the vastness of existence - to seek meaning, purpose, and connection with the sacred, the cosmos, and one another. Traditional theology often treats religion as a set of fixed truths: doctrines that never change, rituals that repeat, and divine realities that remain unmoved. Yet this view tends to neglect the obvious: religions themselves evolve, communities reinterpret, and new experiences constantly reshape how people live their faith.

A process-based approach to religion begins with the insight that reality itself is not static but dynamic, relational, and becoming. From this perspective, religion is not a finished product but a living practice. God (or the sacred) is not a remote, immovable being or truth but a relational presence or dynamism, deeply involved in the unfolding beauty of cosmic creation. Religious traditions are not frozen monuments but ongoing conversations between the divine, cosmic reality,  human and non-human life.

To explore this topic, we might look at major world religions to highlight their non-processual elements (what resists change, emphasizes fixity and impassive immutability) and their processual elements (what emphasizes change, creativity, relationship, and co-creation).

---

Processual Quotes

Alfred North Whitehead (founding process philosopher)

• “The art of progress is to preserve order amid change and to preserve change amid order.” -  Process and Reality

• “God is not to be treated as an exception to the cosmos' metaphysical principles, to be invoked to save their collapse. Rather, God is their chief exemplification.” - Process and Reality

Teilhard de Chardin (who is not strictly a process metaphysician)

• “The history of the living world can be summed up as an elaboration of ever more perfect eyes  [or presence] within a cosmos in which there is always something more to be seen.” - The Phenomenon of Man

Catherine Keller (a Whiteheadian metaphysician)

• “God is not outside the whirl of becoming but is in its very depths, luring [all of reality] towards possibilities of love we [and creation] have not yet dared to imagine.” - On the Mystery

Alfred North Whitehead (on the process of religion)

• “Religion is what the individual does with his own solitariness.” — Religion in the Making

• “Religion will not regain its old power until it faces change in the same spirit as do the sciences.” - Religion in the Making

Buddhist Wisdom

• “All conditioned things are impermanent - when one sees this with wisdom, one turns away from suffering.” - The Buddha, Dhammapada

Indigenous Native American Perspective

• “We are all relatives. Everything the power of the world does is done in a circle.” - Black Elk, Black Elk Speaks

Processual Summary

• “Nothing is ever lost. What is lived becomes part of the becoming.” - paraphrase of Whitehead’s doctrine of objective immortality

---

Christianity

Christianity, with its many branches, provides a vivid case study of how religion can tilt toward either static or dynamic understandings. Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and Protestantism all bear witness to both rigid, timeless claims and to vibrant, adaptive streams of thought.

On the non-processual side, Christianity has often emphasized doctrines of divine immutability, treating God as an unchanging essence unaffected by the world. Scripture has been held by many traditions as an inerrant, closed deposit of truth. Salvation is sometimes reduced to a single juridical act, fixed in the past, and eschatology is framed as a predetermined end in which God conquers the world through final judgment. These emphases draw boundaries around God and faith that resist further development.

Yet Christianity has also been a source of powerful processual insights. Its deepest affirmation is that “God is love,” a love expressed not in detachment but in action and relationship. Scripture itself can be seen not as a static law book but as a record of evolving encounters with God, full of human struggle and divine compassion. Christ is not merely a past event but an ongoing presence drawing creation toward renewal. Process theology, liberation theology, feminist and ecological theologies, all stand within this stream, lifting up relationality, creativity, and justice as central to the gospel. Christianity, at its most dynamic, offers a God who suffers with the world, responds to its cries, and co-creates a future of hope.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Doctrine of divine immutability (God as unchanging essence).

  • Inerrant, once-for-all view of the Bible.

  • Salvation as a completed juridical act rather than an ongoing relational transformation.

  • Emphasis on final eschatological victory framed in terms of conquest or judgment.

• Processual elements:

  • God as love-in-action (dynamic, relational, responsive).

  • Scripture as a living record of evolving encounters with God, not a static code.

  • Christ understood not merely as a past event but as ongoing presence, drawing creation into fuller becoming.

  • Eschatology seen as open-ended hope, a co-creative future with God.

  • Liberation theology, process theology, feminist and ecological theologies—all emphasizing change, justice, and participation.

---

Judaism

Judaism is often seen as a tradition of law, but its story is also one of interpretation, dialogue, and struggle.

The non-processual dimension appears in the Torah understood as a fixed revelation given once and for all. Covenant, in some readings, is framed in juridical terms: God commands, Israel obeys. The law (halakhah) can be seen as immovable, a boundary that defines identity through strict adherence.

But alongside this, Judaism has always carried a processual current. The rabbis of the Talmud engaged in centuries of ongoing interpretation, arguing and reinterpreting texts in light of new circumstances - a tradition of dynamic reading rather than rigid closure. The Hebrew Scriptures themselves depict a God who argues with Abraham, relents at Moses’ plea, and changes the divine plan in response to human action. Judaism’s ethical vision, especially in concepts like tikkun olam (“repairing the world”), reveals a profoundly relational, processual orientation, where humanity partners with God in mending creation.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Torah as fixed revelation, given once and for all.

  • Covenant viewed in juridical terms (obligation/obedience).

  • Strong emphasis on law as immovable boundary.

• Processual elements:

  • Ongoing interpretation (Midrash, Talmud) as a living process of re-reading.

  • God as both transcendent and responsive (Abraham, Moses argue with God).

  • Ethical imperatives toward justice (tikkun olam, repairing the world).

---

Islam

Islam presents a faith that treasures the eternal word of God while also containing a lively history of interpretation and mystical experience.

The non-processual emphasis lies in the Qur’an, understood by most Muslims as God’s final, unalterable revelation. God is proclaimed as utterly transcendent and unchanging, beyond all likeness. Islamic law (sharīʿa) is sometimes treated as an eternal framework, binding across all times and places.

And yet, processual dimensions shine through. Islamic mysticism (Sufism) emphasizes union with God as an ongoing, relational path. God’s ninety-nine names, especially al-Raḥmān (the Merciful) and al-Raḥīm (the Compassionate), reveal divine qualities that are dynamically expressed in history. Islamic philosophy and jurisprudence developed multiple schools, each offering fresh interpretations of revelation in light of new contexts. Far from being monolithic, Islam has carried within it a process of constant debate, renewal, and spiritual creativity.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Qur’an as final, unalterable word of God.

  • God as utterly transcendent and unchanging.

  • Sharīʿa as eternal law.

• Processual elements:

  • Rich mystical tradition (Sufism) emphasizing relational union with God.

  • Concepts of God’s mercy and compassion as dynamic attributes.

  • Ongoing debates and schools of interpretation within Islamic jurisprudence and philosophy.

---

Hinduism

Hinduism is among the oldest and most diverse and fluid of religions, holding together both rigid social structures and profoundly dynamic cosmologies.

The non-processual face of Hinduism is found in its concept of eternal dharma, sometimes tied to caste, ritual, and social order. In certain schools, the ultimate goal (moksha) is portrayed as escaping the cycle of becoming, rising above process altogether.

Yet Hinduism overflows with processual imagery. Samsara, the cycle of birth and rebirth, expresses a universe of continuous becoming. The gods themselves embody dynamism: Vishnu takes new avatars in each age; Shiva dances creation into being. The bhakti traditions highlight an ongoing, evolving relationship of devotion between human and divine, where love is not frozen but constantly renewed. Hinduism’s sheer plurality is itself a testimony to process: it refuses to be a single static truth, instead offering a kaleidoscope of ways to imagine and live in relation to the sacred.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Eternal dharma (cosmic order and duty) fixed in caste and ritual.

  • Some schools’ emphasis on moksha as escape from process rather than fulfillment within it.

• Processual elements:

  • Emphasis on cyclical becoming (samsara).

  • God(s) in dynamic forms (Vishnu’s avatars, Shiva’s dance).

  • Bhakti traditions highlight relational devotion as a living, evolving bond.

---

Buddhism

Buddhism, often thought of as a philosophy of liberation, balances between transcending process and embracing it.

On the non-processual side, some schools present nirvana as an end to becoming, a cessation of the wheel of life (similar to the Christian concept of "heaven"). Strict adherence to monastic rules can be seen as an unchanging framework.

But at its heart, Buddhism is one of the most processual faiths. The central teaching of impermanence (anicca) recognizes that all things are in flux. The doctrine of dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) describes reality as a web of relational becoming, echoing process metaphysics closely. In Mahāyāna traditions, the bodhisattva path emphasizes an open-ended, co-creative compassion for all beings - a refusal to finalize the journey until all can share in liberation. Buddhism sees wisdom not as possession of a static truth but as a practice of attunement to the changing reality of life.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Certain schools stress nirvana as cessation (end of becoming).

  • Strict adherence to monastic codes as unchanging.

• Processual elements:

  • Central doctrine of impermanence (anicca).

  • Dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) resonates strongly with process thought.

  • Mahāyāna bodhisattva path as an open-ended co-creative compassion with all beings.

---

Confucianism

Confucianism is often perceived as rigid, but it too contains both static and dynamic strands.

The non-processual emphasis lies in its hierarchies of family and state, its insistence on ritual propriety (li) as an enduring framework, and its structured sense of social order.

Yet Confucianism also carries processual wisdom. Its vision of harmony resonates with the Dao, suggesting that true order arises from dynamic balance, not static control. Moral cultivation (ren, humaneness) is not a one-time achievement but an ongoing process of relational becoming. The Confucian ideal is not a perfect system frozen in time but a continual effort to embody virtue in shifting circumstances.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Rigid hierarchies of family and state.

  • Emphasis on ritual propriety (li) as fixed.

• Processual elements:

  • Dao-like vision of harmony as dynamic balance.

  • Emphasis on moral cultivation as an ongoing, relational process.

---

Daoism (the closest to the process metaphysic)

Daoism, perhaps more than any other tradition, lives in process.

There are non-processual strands where Daoist texts are treated as esoteric secrets or where rituals become fixed formulas.

But the processual heart of Daoism is unmistakable. The Dao itself is the ever-flowing process of reality, ungraspable yet present in all things. Wu-wei, often translated as “non-coercive action,” is about moving with the flow of becoming, not against it. Yin and yang are polarities in constant transformation, never absolute, always relational. Daoism celebrates the ever-shifting, evolving nature of existence as sacred.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Some sectarian traditions treat Daoist texts as esoteric, frozen wisdom.

• Processual elements:

  • Dao itself: the ever-flowing, evolving process of nature.

  • Wu-wei (non-coercive action) as aligning with the flow of becoming.

  • Yin–yang as relational polarity, constantly shifting.

---

Indigenous and Earth-based Religions

Finally, indigenous and earth-centered religions often embody relational worldviews that resonate deeply with process thought as reality itself - and the cosmos - are each processual in their metaphysical ideations and quantum structures.

Some traditions may lean toward non-processual aspects when mythic frameworks or rituals are treated as absolute and unchangeable.

Yet overwhelmingly, these religions express processual wisdom: the land is alive, ancestors remain present, and the sacred is woven into the cycles of season and renewal. Sacredness is not confined to one place or time but is dynamic, relational, and communal. Here, religion is understood not as doctrine but as lived reciprocity with the earth and its beings.

• Non-processual elements:

  • Some fixed rituals or mythic frameworks treated as absolute.

• Processual elements:

  • Deep sense of relationality with land, ancestors, spirits.

  • Emphasis on cycles, seasons, and renewal.

  • Sacredness as dynamic, woven through lived community.

---

What a Process Religion might look like?

From these comparisons, we can say that process religion is any religious orientation that:

1. Sees reality as fundamentally dynamic, relational, and creative.

2. Views the divine (or ultimate reality) as engaged in process with the world.

3. Treats scriptures, rituals, and doctrines as evolving, open to reinterpretation.

4. Emphasizes ethical co-creation, justice, and relational harmony.

Process religion, then, is not a new faith but a way of inhabiting all faiths. It does not demand that Christians cease to be Christian, Muslims abandon Islam, Buddhists turn away from the Dharma, or indigenous peoples surrender their ancestral traditions. Rather, it invites adherents of every path to discover, within their own heritage, the living pulse of relationality and change.

Instead of seeing religion as a fortress of unalterable dogma, process religion views each tradition as a river: it has a source, it has shaped landscapes through which it has flowed, and it continues to wind, merge, and transform as it journeys forward. This vision recognizes that all religions contain seeds of dynamism, creativity, and interconnection - though often hidden under layers of rigidity or fear of change.

When these seeds are nurtured, faith becomes less about defending absolutes and more about cultivating life. A process-oriented religion is one that draws from its deepest wells of compassion, justice, and community while remaining open to new insights from science, culture, and interfaith encounter. It is not uniformity it seeks, but harmony in diversity - an evolving chorus of traditions, each contributing its voice to the song of becoming.

In this way, process religion offers a shared horizon for humanity. It calls us to engage our faiths as living companions rather than frozen monuments, and to participate with God—or the sacred, the Dao, the Dharma, the Great Spirit—in the unfolding of a future where love, justice, and creativity are not only preserved but multiplied.

---

Conclusion

Process religion does not dismiss or belittle tradition. It honors the wisdom of the past while refusing to let it harden into stone. Where static religion clings to immovable walls of doctrine, process religion finds the sacred in flowing rivers and evolving relationships. It understands faith not as a frozen monument but as a living journey, always responding, always becoming.

At its heart, process religion is not a new faith but a way of inhabiting all faiths. It does not ask us to abandon our roots but to re-inhabit them with fresh eyes. Every tradition carries within it seeds of dynamism, creativity, and relationality - seeds that can lie dormant when religion is reduced to rigidity, but which can blossom when nourished by openness, compassion, and dialogue.

To see religion as process is to see it as a conglomeration of comingling rivers rather than fortress, as evolving symphonies rather than finished score. It is to recognize that God, or the sacred, or the Dao, is not distant and immutable but deeply interwoven with our lives and histories - luring us toward possibilities of love, justice, and beauty not yet imagined.

When religions open themselves to this processual horizon, they become partners in co-creation with one another and with the cosmos itself. They discover their truest vocation: not to guard old walls, but to help cultivate a flourishing world.

Process religion, then, is a call to live our traditions dynamically, to honor their past while allowing them to breathe, adapt, and grow. It is a summons to trust that in the unfolding of life - in its uncertainty, struggle, and surprise - divine presence is not only with us but moving ahead of us, around us, within us, drawing all creation towards a future where love, creativity, and relational harmony will have the final word.

---

A Creed for Process Religion

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

We believe reality is ever in motion,
dynamic, relational, and creative.

We believe the divine is not remote,
but deeply present, luring the world toward love.

We believe scriptures, rituals, and doctrines
are living streams, not finished monuments.

We believe faith is not to be defended as fortress,
but cultivated as garden,
tended with care, courage, and imagination.

We believe all peoples and all creatures
are participants in one great becoming,
called into justice, compassion, and co-creation.

Therefore, we walk in hope,
trusting that nothing is wasted,
and that every moment adds its thread
to the fabric of a future still unfolding in God.

R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

September 28, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications

all rights reserved

---

A Process Poem for Religion

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Not a wall,
but a river.
Not a monument,
but a journey.

The sacred is not locked in the past,
but moving ahead of us,
weaving threads of love
into futures not yet seen.

Every tradition carries seeds:
some buried deep in fear,
others breaking open
toward the light of justice,
the rain of compassion,
the soil of shared becoming.

To live process religion
is to tend these seeds,
to trust the river,
to walk together
in the unfolding song
of God and world
becoming more.

R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

September 28, 2025

@copyright R.E. Slater Publications

all rights reserved

---

Bibliography:

Process Theologians Writing From Within Their Traditions

---

How to Use This List

• For core Christian process: start with Cobb, Griffin, Suchocki, Keller.

• For Jewish: Artson is your cornerstone.

• For Islamic: begin with Farhan Shah’s essays/dialogues; watch emerging scholarship by Azadegan and others.

• For South & East Asian traditions: Ames & Hall (Confucian/Daoist), Abe & Loy (Buddhist), and Jeffery Long (Hindu).

• For interfaith method: Cobb’s “mutual transformation,” McDaniel’s ecological pluralism, Keller’s polyphonic relationality.

---

Interfaith & Comparative (Process authors building bridges)

• John B. Cobb Jr. Transforming Christianity and the World: A Way Beyond Absolutism and Relativism (1999). Process pluralism; outlines “mutual transformation.”

• Cobb & Christopher Ives (eds.) The Emptying God: A Buddhist-Jewish-Christian Conversation (1990). Landmark three-tradition dialogue.

• Jay McDaniel Earth, Sky, Gods and Mortals (1990) and Gandhi’s Hope (2005). Process comparative theology with Hindu/Buddhist interlocutors and ecological praxis.

• Catherine Keller & Laurel Schneider (eds.) Polydoxy: Theology of Multiplicity and Relation (2010). Constructive essays modeling relational, non-hegemonic theology across traditions.

• Philip Clayton Adventures in the Spirit (2008). Panentheist/process-friendly comparative work on science, religion, and global pluralism.

• Andrew M. Davis (ed.) Mind, Value, and Cosmos: On the Relational Nature of Reality (2020). Broad process-relational collection touching multiple traditions.

---

Christianity (Process & Process-adjacent Authors within Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant streams)

• John B. Cobb Jr. Christ in a Pluralistic Age (1975). Foundational Christology in explicitly Whiteheadian terms; norm-setting for Christian process theology.

• David Ray Griffin God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy (1976). Classic constructive account of divine power and the problem of evil.

• Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki God, Christ, Church: A Practical Guide to Process Theology (1982) and The Fall to Violence (1994). Clear, pastoral introductions; incisive soteriology.

• Catherine Keller On the Mystery (2008) and Cloud of the Impossible (2014). Relational, apophatic, ecological process theology.

• Joseph A. Bracken, SJ The One in the Many: A Contemporary Reconstruction of the God-World Relationship (2001). Catholic social-trinitarian process metaphysics.

• Thomas Jay Oord The Uncontrolling Love of God (2015). Open-and-relational (process-friendly) account of divine action and creaturely freedom.

• Monica A. Coleman Making a Way Out of No Way (2008). Womanist process theology of survival, creativity, and community.

• Bruce G. Epperly Process Theology: A Guide for the Perplexed (2011). Short, lucid primer with constructive Christian applications.

• Schubert M. Ogden The Reality of God and Other Essays (1966). Early analytic-leaning process Christology and revelation.

• Andrew M. Davis (ed.) Process Theology and the Christian Doctrine of God (2020). Contemporary essays updating classic Christian doctrines in process terms.

Helpful eco-process picks: Cobb, Is It Too Late?; Jay McDaniel, Of God and Pelicans; Keller, Political Theology of the Earth.

---

Judaism

• Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson God of Becoming and Relationship: The Dynamic Nature of Process Theology (2013). Definitive Jewish process statement; Torah, covenant, and prayer in relational terms.

• Artson (ed.) Roving with the River: Jewish Process Theology (essays; various years). Collected pieces applying process ideas across Jewish practice and thought.

• William E. Kaufman The Case for God (1991) and Contemporary Jewish Philosophies (1991). Early Jewish engagements with process and panentheism.

---

Islam

• Farhan A. Shah & John B. Cobb Jr. Islam and Process Thought (essay collections & dialogues, 2018–). A Muslim process philosopher (Shah) articulates Qur’anic faith in relational/panentheistic terms.

• Basil Altaie God, Nature and the Cause: Essays on Islam and Science (2016). Continuous creation and divine action in a dynamic cosmos; not strictly Whiteheadian but process-compatible.

• Ebrahim Azadegan God and the Problem of Evil in Islamic Thought: A Process Theodicy (forthcoming/essays). Iranian philosopher constructing an Islamic process theodicy.

(Islamic process theology is an active, newer stream; much appears in article/essay form and in Cobb Institute venues.)

---

Hinduism

• Jeffery D. Long A Vision for Hinduism: Beyond Hindu Nationalism (2007) and essays on Hinduism & process/pluralism. A practicing Hindu philosopher engaging Whiteheadian categories.

• Anantanand Rambachan A Hindu Theology of Liberation (2015). Advaita Vedānta reinterpreted with relational, constructive (process-friendly) accents.

• John B. Cobb Jr. & Christopher Chapple (eds.) Hinduism and Christianity (1990). Mutual transformation model; includes Hindu voices dialoguing with process.

---

Buddhism

• Masao Abe Zen and Western Thought (1985). A Zen philosopher in sustained dialogue with process theists on emptiness and relational becoming.

• John B. Cobb Jr. Beyond Dialogue: Toward a Mutual Transformation of Christianity and Buddhism (1982). Classic process “mutual transformation” paradigm.

• David R. Loy Nonduality: A Study in Comparative Philosophy (1988). Buddhist philosopher mapping nonduality and process-relational resonances.

---

Confucianism / Daoism (Process-relational Chinese philosophy)

• It should be noted that process-based ecological studies & eco-civilization studies are of high importance in China and that the Institute of Process Studies via John Cobb has been highly engaged with China's efforts to adapt and embrace their industrial society toward an integrated green and blue (water and air) infrastructures based on process philosophy.

• Roger T. Ames & David L. Hall Thinking Through Confucius (1987), Anticipating China (1995). Seminal “process-relational” readings of Confucian thought.

• Ames (trans.) Sun-Tzu: The Art of Warfare; Dao De Jing (with D. L. Hall). Renderings that foreground fluid, relational ontology consonant with process.

• Tu Weiming Centrality and Commonality: An Essay on Confucian Religiousness (1989). Confucian spirituality as cultivated, relational process.

---

Indigenous / Earth-Based (Relational theologies with explicit process resonance)

• Randy S. Woodley Shalom and the Community of Creation (2012). Indigenous Christian theology of relationality, land, and harmony; deeply process-aligned.

• Jay McDaniel Eco-Spirituality and the Way of Jesus (2006) & essays on world-loyalty and grassroots relationality.

Biblical Truth in the Marketplace: MAGA Christianity vs. Process Theology

Biblical Truth in the Marketplace

MAGA Christianity vs. Process Theology

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

Christian culture leaders continue the age old practice

of manufacturing a God and a faith in their own image...

By their fruits ye shall know them...

Matthew 7.16

Introduction

The phrase “biblical truth in the marketplace” has become popular among MAGA-Christian leaders. At first glance, it sounds noble - a call to live faithfully in public. But when examined closely, it reflects a worldview in which Scripture is reduced to a rigid ideology, wielded as a tool for political and cultural dominance. It suggests that the Bible is a fixed code of divine decrees, directly transferable into legislation and policy, with the goal of imposing “God’s will” on any society - especially a pluralistic society.

By contrast, Process Theology (e.g., Process Christianity) approaches truth as dynamic, relational, and rooted in God’s persuasive love. It does not treat the marketplace as a battlefield to be conquered, but as a shared commons where truth emerges in relationship, responsibility, and creative dialogue.

To understand the difference, we need to look at four key areas: how each views Scripture, the marketplace, authority, and ethics.

Matthew 7:16 is part of Jesus's teaching on false prophets, stating, "Do people pick grapes from thornbushes; figs from thistles?" This illustrates that just as a plant produces fruit in keeping with its nature, so too will false prophets be identified by their actions. The "fruit," or outward manifestations of their faith, will reveal their true character and actions, allowing people to recognize them for what they are.  

Context of the Verse

• Beware of False Prophets: Jesus instructs believers to be wary of false prophets who appear righteous on the outside but are inwardly corrupt, like wolves in sheep's clothing. 

• Identifying False Prophets: The verse follows the analogy of a good tree bearing good fruit and a bad tree bearing bad fruit, meaning a person's true nature is revealed through their actions and behavior. 

Meaning of the Metaphor

• Fruit as Actions/Character: The "fruit" symbolizes the outward manifestations of a person's faith, which includes their behavior and works.

• Nature of the Tree: Just as a healthy tree produces its respective fruit (grapes from grapevines, figs from fig trees), a person's true character will produce corresponding fruits.

• Revealing True Nature: Therefore, by observing the "fruit" of a person's life—their actions and deeds—you can recognize their true nature, whether they are a true prophet or a deceptive one.

---

One Bible Verse BLOWS UP MAGA's

False Version of "Christian Faith"

1. The MAGA Approach: Truth as Weapon

MAGA-Christianity treats the Bible primarily as a literal and static text. It is read selectively, with emphasis on passages that reinforce hierarchical structures, exclusionary norms, and culture-war talking points. The marketplace — whether of ideas, politics, or economics — is seen as a battleground where the faithful must “stand firm” against secularism, liberalism, and pluralism.

This approach assumes that biblical truth is self-evident, unchanging, and universally binding in exactly the same form as ancient Israelite law or early church instruction. Any deviation is condemned as compromise or apostasy. In practice, “truth” becomes a tool to mark insiders and outsiders, to reward loyalty, and to punish dissent.

The consequence is that truth is turned into a weapon: a way of controlling discourse, excluding difference, and justifying domination. Rather than engaging society with humility, MAGA Christianity approaches public life with suspicion and hostility, confident that its interpretation of Scripture alone represents God’s absolute will.

• Literalized Scripture: MAGA-Christianity often treats the Bible as an inerrant rulebook. Truth becomes propositional, absolute, and transferable into slogans.

• Marketplace as Battlefield: Public life is seen as a zero-sum contest where God’s people must impose biblical standards over against “the world.”

• Power over Love: The emphasis falls on enforcing “God’s truth” through legislation, rhetoric, and dominance, with little regard for diversity or dialogue.

This approach mirrors the very forms of religious nationalism Bonhoeffer opposed in Nazi Germany: the fusion of religion and political ideology into a weaponized faith.

---

2. The Process Approach: Truth as Relational Becoming

Process Theology begins with a different assumption: reality itself is processual, always becoming, always relational. Scripture, therefore, is not a frozen rulebook but a dynamic witness to humanity’s evolving encounter with God. Its authority lies not in literal fixity but in its ability to call communities into deeper love, justice, and creativity.

The marketplace in this vision is not a battlefield but a commons. It is a place where diverse voices meet, where truth is not imposed but discovered together through dialogue and interaction. Process thought insists that God’s truth is persuasive, not coercive — it invites but does not compel. This means truth must be tested in community, weighed by its fruits, and continually reinterpreted in light of new contexts.

Where MAGA-Christianity closes the circle around what truth was, process thought opens the circle toward what truth is becoming. It insists that God is still speaking, still drawing creation toward greater beauty, harmony, and justice.

• Dynamic Scripture: In a process lens, the Bible is not a static code but a living witness to humanity’s evolving encounter with God. Its authority lies not in literal fixity but in its power to inspire justice, compassion, and creativity.

• Marketplace as Community: Rather than a battlefield, the marketplace is a shared space of dialogue and mutual influence. Truth is discerned in relationship, tested by its fruits of love and justice.

• Love over Power: In process thought, God’s truth is persuasive, not coercive. It calls humanity into cooperative becoming, not conquest.

Here, truth is not owned but shared. It does not silence the other but invites all voices into the work of co-creation.

---

3. Competing Visions of Authority

The difference in how each side understands authority is stark.

• MAGA Christianity: Authority is rooted in the literal text of the Bible, interpreted through the lens of conservative tradition and enforced by political power. This results in a rigid hierarchy: God speaks → the Bible records → we enforce. In this model, authority is top-down and unquestionable. Dissent is framed as rebellion against God himself.

• Process Theology: Authority is rooted in Christ as the living Word, mediated through Scripture but always discerned in context. Authority is relational and dialogical — God calls, but humans respond freely and responsibly. Scripture is authoritative, but never in isolation from conscience, community, and the Spirit’s ongoing work in history.

This difference leads to two contrasting visions of the marketplace. For MAGA Christianity, authority justifies domination; for Process Theology, authority enables dialogue and growth. One uses power to enforce compliance; the other seeks understanding and cooperation.

• MAGA Christianity: Authority rests in the literal text, interpreted through the lens of cultural conservatism and political power.

• Process Theology: Authority rests in Christ as the living Word, continually interpreted in context, always calling communities toward justice, compassion, and creative transformation.

Where MAGA-Christianity seeks to fix truth in the past, process thought seeks to embody truth in the present, always open to God’s ongoing call.

---

4. Ethics in the Marketplace

Ethics is where the contrast becomes most visible.

• MAGA Ethics: Right and wrong are defined by conformity to fixed codes. Success is measured by victory in cultural battles: passing laws, winning elections, controlling school boards, restricting rights. The guiding question is: Are we winning the fight to preserve biblical values against our enemies? This produces a binary ethic of winners and losers, insiders and outsiders.

• Process Ethics: Right and wrong are discerned through love’s reach and creativity’s expansion. Success is measured by whether actions increase the well-being of all — human and nonhuman, individual and communal. The guiding question is: Does this action contribute to justice, compassion, and the flourishing of life? This produces an ethic of cooperation, responsibility, and mutual care.

Where MAGA Christianity divides the marketplace into opposing camps, Process Theology seeks to weave it into a shared commons. One works to preserve dominance; the other works to foster relational wholeness.

• MAGA’s Ethics: Obedience is measured by conformity to rigid codes. The goal is victory — protecting “our” values against “theirs.”

• Process Ethics: Responsibility is measured by love’s reach and creativity’s expansion. The goal is cooperation — seeking the good of all in an interdependent world.

In short: MAGA ethics divides the marketplace into winners and losers; process ethics opens it into a shared commons of becoming.

---

Conclusion

When MAGA-Christian leaders speak of “biblical truth in the marketplace,” they mean a static truth wielded for political control. It is truth as weapon: exclusionary, rigid, and triumphalist. Process Theology offers a different vision: truth as relational becoming, discerned in community, tested by love, and persuasive rather than coercive.

The contrast could not be sharper. One approach seeks to control the marketplace; the other seeks to transform it into a commons where God’s truth is lived out in justice, compassion, and creativity.

Summary Observation: If truth is to have meaning in public life, it cannot be reduced to slogans of power. It must be lived in the costly, dynamic work of relationship. Biblical truth in the marketplace is not about conquest but about co-creation. It is not about controlling society but about participating with God in its ongoing renewal.

---

Bibliography

MAGA-Christianity / Culture War Sources

(Useful to understand the mindset and rhetoric, even if problematic)

• Eric Metaxas, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy (Thomas Nelson, 2010).

  • Key text for how Bonhoeffer is repurposed in evangelical/MAGA narratives.

• Eric Metaxas, Letter to the American Church (Salem Books, 2022).

  • Explicitly frames today’s America as a replay of 1930s Germany, urging Christians to resist “cultural capitulation.”

• David Barton, The Myth of Separation (WallBuilder Press, 1992).

  • An influential but deeply flawed book promoting the idea of America as a “Christian nation.”

• Stephen Wolfe, The Case for Christian Nationalism (Canon Press, 2022).

  • A systematic argument for merging Christianity with political control in the U.S.

---

Process Theology & Alternatives to Culture War

• Tripp Ruller, The Rise of Bonhoeffer, multi-series podcast

• John B. Cobb Jr., Christ in a Pluralistic Age (Westminster, 1975).

  • A classic in Process Christology, emphasizing relational truth and interreligious dialogue.

• Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, God, Christ, Church: A Practical Guide to Process Theology (Crossroad, 1982).

  • A clear introduction to Process Theology’s dynamic view of truth, ethics, and community.

• Catherine Keller, On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Process (Fortress, 2008).

  • Explores relational truth, pluralism, and public theology in a process framework.

• Thomas Jay Oord, The Uncontrolling Love of God (IVP Academic, 2015).

  • Though not strictly process-only, it extends relational/process insights into theology of love and freedom.

• Bruce Epperly, Process Theology: Embracing Adventure with God (Energion, 2011).

  • A very accessible introduction that connects process thought with daily ethical and public life.

---

Broader Critiques / Contextual Works

• Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation (Liveright, 2020).

  • Essential for understanding evangelicalism’s drift into Christian nationalism.

• Samuel L. Perry & Andrew L. Whitehead, Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States (Oxford, 2020).

  • Academic sociological study of Christian nationalism as an ideology.

• Stephen R. Haynes, The Battle for Bonhoeffer: Debating Discipleship in the Age of Trump (Eerdmans, 2018).

  • Directly addresses how Bonhoeffer has been claimed by both MAGA Christianity and progressive theology.

---

✅ Summary Observation:

• If you want to see how “biblical truth in the marketplace” is weaponized → Metaxas, Wolfe, Barton.

• If you want to see how Process Theology reframes truth relationally and non-coercively → Cobb, Suchocki, Keller, Oord, Epperly.

• If you want context and critique of the culture war itself → Du Mez, Perry/Whitehead, Haynes.

Bonhoeffer's Legacy Defies Maga-Christianity's Mis-Use

Bonhoeffer's Legacy Defies

Maga-Christianity's Mis-Use

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

Christian culture leaders continue the age old practice

of manufacturing a God and a faith in their own image...

By their fruits ye shall know them...

Matthew 7.16

I'm not a fan of Eric Metaxas who wrote a "shaded" (not shady, tho' perhaps it is) biography on Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Currently he's stumping about maga-Christian circles speaking to "biblical truth in  the marketplace" which is a lot of huey based upon maga-Christusnity's literalized view of their Bible. So I asked Chatbot as to it's thoughts or comments on the subject and this is what Chatbot and I came up with....

---

Me

Chat, what's your thoughts on the subject that Christian culture leaders have manufactured a God and a faith in their image?

ChatGPT

Yes, I share your concerns. Eric Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy is widely read, but among scholars of Bonhoeffer it’s considered “shaded,” as you put it—presented with a selective lens that tends to fit contemporary culture-war agendas rather than Bonhoeffer’s own complex theological and ethical context.

---

Framing the Discussion

1. Bonhoeffer’s Own Witness

• Bonhoeffer’s resistance to Hitler wasn’t grounded in a “literalized” biblicism, but in a deep Christocentric ethic of costly grace (Nachfolge / Discipleship).

• His theology was profoundly relational and incarnational: Christ present in community, in suffering, and in the neighbor. That makes him hard to “weaponize” for a movement centered on political domination.

• He also emphasized responsibility before God and others, not rigid proof-texting.

2. Metaxas’s Portrayal

• Metaxas tends to flatten Bonhoeffer into an evangelical hero-figure, casting him as a proto-culture-warrior who validates a conservative “biblical truth in the marketplace” approach.

• Historians such as Clifford Green, Victoria Barnett, and Charles Marsh have noted that this misrepresents Bonhoeffer’s theology, cutting him off from his Lutheran, ecumenical, and even progressive impulses.

3. MAGA-Christian Context

• The language of “biblical truth in the marketplace” in MAGA-Christian circles often amounts to a literalist, triumphalist rhetoric: “our Bible, our truth, our politics.”

• Bonhoeffer would have opposed precisely this conflation of God’s Word with nationalistic ideology. In Letters and Papers from Prison, he warns against religion used as a tool of power, advocating instead for a “religionless Christianity” that seeks the neighbor’s good and lives under Christ’s lordship without grasping for control.

4. The Deeper Irony

• To invoke Bonhoeffer in support of authoritarian or exclusionary politics turns his witness upside down. He stood against state-sanctioned ideology masquerading as Christianity.

• His true legacy is prophetic courage: the willingness to suffer, even unto death, for love of Christ and solidarity with the oppressed. That is radically different from “biblical truth as market slogan.”

---

✅ Summary

In my estimation, I’d say: Metaxas offers a popularized Bonhoeffer that resonates with evangelical culture warriors, but it strips away the depth of his theology and the nuance of his resistance. It’s closer to propaganda than to serious biography. - ChatGPT

---

Me

Create a side-by-side comparison of Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer vs. Scholarly Bonhoeffer, so the contrasts are clear.

---

Bonhoeffer: Metaxas vs. Scholarly Portrait

1. Theological Orientation

• Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer:

  • Cast as a proto-evangelical, with strong affinities to American conservative Protestantism.

  • Emphasis on “biblical inerrancy,” personal piety, and simple moral clarity.

  • Downplays Bonhoeffer’s academic theology (Lutheran, Barthian, ecumenical roots).

• Scholarly Bonhoeffer:

  • Deeply shaped by German Lutheranism, Barth’s Christocentrism, and ecumenical theology.

  • Theology is complex, dialectical, and incarnational — Christ encountered in community and in the “other.”

  • Wrote about costly grace (discipleship requiring suffering and obedience) and “religionless Christianity” (faith beyond culture-bound religiosity).

---

2. Political Engagement

• Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer:

  • Portrayed as a clear, almost lone prophet standing against Hitler.

  • Becomes a poster-child for “speaking truth to power” in ways that resonate with MAGA-Christian culture wars.

  • Simplified into a battle of “true believers” vs. secular/evil forces.

• Scholarly Bonhoeffer:

  • His resistance grew gradually and painfully, rooted in theological wrestling and communal discernment.

  • Was part of the Confessing Church movement, not an isolated hero.

  • Emphasized ethical responsibility before God and community, not a culture-war stance.

---

3. Use of Scripture

• Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer:

  • Depicted as relying on literalized “biblical truth” — a direct link to contemporary evangelical proof-texting.

  • Often implied that Bonhoeffer validates present-day “Bible in the marketplace” slogans.

• Scholarly Bonhoeffer:

  • Scripture read Christocentrically, not literalistically.

  • The Word is always mediated through Christ and interpreted in community.

  • His approach to the Bible was dynamic, ethical, and incarnational rather than rigid.

---

4. View of Christianity

• Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer:

  • Christianity is framed as moral clarity and heroic faith against secularism.

  • Fits neatly into the narrative of “Christian America” vs. enemies of God.

• Scholarly Bonhoeffer:

  • Christianity is lived in weakness, suffering, and responsibility — “When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.”

  • Acknowledges ambiguity, failure, and costly obedience rather than triumphal certainty.

  • “Religionless Christianity” critiques any political/religious fusion.

---

5. Legacy

• Metaxas’s Bonhoeffer:

  • Inspirational hero, mobilized for American evangelical and MAGA culture-war battles.

  • Becomes a symbolic validation of “fighting back” with God on one’s side.

• Scholarly Bonhoeffer:

  • Martyr who points toward humility, solidarity with the oppressed, and faithful resistance to tyranny.

  • His theology resists being co-opted by any ideology — left, right, or otherwise.

  • Legacy is about prophetic witness in love, not weaponizing faith.

---

✅ Summary

Metaxas presents a Bonhoeffer made in the image of American evangelical culture wars — simplified, heroic, and mobilized. Scholars present Bonhoeffer as a complex, Christ-centered thinker whose legacy warns precisely against the fusion of political ideology with religious certainty.

---

Bonhoeffer’s Words that Resist Fusion with MAGA-Christian Misuse and Abuse

1. On Grace & Discipleship

• MAGA Misuse: Bonhoeffer as a symbol of “moral clarity” and nationalistic defense of “biblical truth.”

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.” (The Cost of Discipleship)

  • True discipleship is costly, involving suffering and loss — not triumphalist slogans or political conquest.

---

2. On Religion as Power

• MAGA Misuse: Christianity equated with political power and cultural dominance.

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “What keeps gnawing at me is the question, what is Christianity, or who is Christ actually for us today?” (Letters and Papers from Prison)
  “We are moving towards a completely religionless age.”

  • Bonhoeffer warns against fusing Christianity with cultural/political power. He sought a faith stripped of domination, grounded in Christ’s presence with the suffering.

---

3. On Community

• MAGA Misuse: Faith used as an individualistic “truth weapon” in the marketplace.

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “The church is the church only when it exists for others… not dominating, but helping and serving.” (Letters and Papers from Prison)

  • Christianity is relational and outward-facing, not a tool for control or exclusion.

---

4. On Truth & Lies

• MAGA Misuse: Claiming monopoly on “truth” while aligning with manipulative politics.

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “If you board the wrong train, it is no use running along the corridor in the opposite direction.” (Ethics)

  • Truth isn’t about slogans; it’s about living responsibly before God, even when it means opposing one’s own cultural tribe.

---

5. On Responsibility

• MAGA Misuse: Casting themselves as persecuted heroes while wielding power.

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “Action springs not from thought, but from a readiness for responsibility.” (Letters and Papers from Prison)

  • Faith is not self-martyring theater — it is accountable, ethical responsibility to God and neighbor.

---

6. On Power & Weakness

• MAGA Misuse: Strength and domination framed as “God’s will.”

• Bonhoeffer’s Word:

  “God lets himself be pushed out of the world on to the cross. He is weak and powerless in the world, and that is precisely the way, the only way, in which he is with us and helps us.” (Letters and Papers from Prison)

  • God’s presence is in vulnerability, not triumphalist displays of power.

---

✅ Summary

Bonhoeffer’s own words consistently undermine the ways he is being recruited by MAGA-Christianity. His Christ is one of costly grace, weakness, and solidarity with the suffering — not a culture-war general.

---

Conclusion

The true Bonhoeffer cannot be reconciled with the agenda of MAGA-Christianity. His writings dismantle the very fusion of religion and nationalism that many seek to justify by invoking his name.

Bonhoeffer’s legacy is not a call to culture war but a summons to costly discipleship, to a church that exists for others, to truth that resists manipulation, and to a God revealed in weakness and suffering love. To misappropriate Bonhoeffer for partisan battles is to silence the very witness for which he lived and died.

Bonhoeffer’s witness speaks clearly: Christianity is not about seizing control but about sharing in Christ’s suffering for the sake of the world. His life is a rebuke to those who would wield the Bible as a weapon of domination. If he speaks to us today, it is not to baptize the church's culture wars but to call us into a deeper, more sacrificial way of following Christ.

---

The Rise of Bonhoeffer

Bibliography

Here’s a bibliography of widely respected Bonhoeffer biographies and studies, followed by Eric Metaxas’s version for contrast. I’ve grouped them for clarity:

---

Respected Scholarly Biographies on Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Classic / Authoritative Biographies

• Eberhard Bethge, Dietrich Bonhoeffer: A Biography (Fortress Press, rev. 2000; first German ed. 1967).

  • The definitive, monumental biography by Bonhoeffer’s close friend and student. Exhaustive, detailed, and indispensable.

• Ferdinand Schlingensiepen, Dietrich Bonhoeffer 1906–1945: Martyr, Thinker, Man of Resistance (T&T Clark, 2010).

  • A scholarly yet accessible biography, widely praised as the best modern single-volume study.

Accessible & Reliable Biographies

• Tripp Ruller, The Rise of Bonhoeffer, multi-series podcast

• Mary Bosanquet, The Life and Death of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Harper & Row, 1969).

  • A concise, readable introduction for general readers.

• Victoria J. Barnett, For the Soul of the People: Protestant Protest Against Hitler (Oxford University Press, 1992).

  • Not exclusively a biography, but an excellent contextual study situating Bonhoeffer within the Confessing Church.

• Charles Marsh, Strange Glory: A Life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Knopf, 2014).

  • A well-written, literary-style biography. It stirred some debate among scholars for interpretation choices, but remains reliable and nuanced.

• Stephen R. Haynes, The Battle for Bonhoeffer: Debating Discipleship in the Age of Trump (Eerdmans, 2018).

  • Explores how Bonhoeffer is misappropriated in contemporary American politics, particularly by the religious right.

---

Bonhoeffer’s Own Writings (Essential for Biographical Insight)

• Letters and Papers from Prison (Fortress, various editions).

• The Cost of Discipleship (Nachfolge) (SCM/Fortress).

• Life Together (Gemeinsames Leben).

• Ethics.

These are crucial for letting Bonhoeffer “speak for himself” and provide an antidote to distorted portrayals.

---

Eric Metaxas’s Version (Popular but Problematic)

• Eric Metaxas, Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy (Thomas Nelson, 2010).

  • A New York Times bestseller, widely read in evangelical and MAGA-Christian circles.

  • Criticized by Bonhoeffer scholars for its selective interpretation, inaccuracies, and tendency to portray Bonhoeffer as an American-style evangelical culture warrior.

---

✅ Recommendation:

For depth and accuracy, start with Bethge or Schlingensiepen. For readability, Marsh is strong. For critique of misuse, Haynes is invaluable. Metaxas is useful only as an example of how Bonhoeffer has been co-opted.