by R.E. Slater
Reading Feinberg's earnest but mistaken surmise of process theology which was published by the Gospel Coalition some years ago I can say that I heartily disagree with both the essay and the understanding of the essay. However, it is important to understand why today's church disbelieves process theology and the many errors the church entertains in its thinking about process theology.
As a process guy I can do little to dissuade those who cling to such essays and hold out reasons to viewing the God I know in traditionally unhelpful ways such as found in classic evangelicalism. I personally have found evangelicalism to have wholly failed and must therefore be wholly abandoned in the life of a Christian. Why?
I had some years ago, and since, have actively reworked the Calvinist Reformed tradition I knew so well in order to speak better of the God of the bible than the traditional church has done under its rubrics, creeds, attitudes, and deeds. If you wish to argue this point then I submit the entirety of this website here, Relevancy22, to see how I went about deconstructing and reconstruction the Christian faith. It's truest version is that of God's love and the Atoning Work of Christ Jesus.
I first sought for a better hermeneutic and reading of the bible by removing and adding ways of reading theology. This took me several years where in the process the Spirit of the Lord lead to the development of an open and relational theology, and then later to process theology. Eventually I put the two together and came upon a fellowship I never knew existed. Fortunately, I had stumbled rightly in directions removing the philosophical Christian God from Greek Hellenism and Westernism into a wholly new philosophic-theological foundation. Which is to say I was looking in the wrong place. The very foundations of the Christian belief had been set upon vastly inferior foundations which needed breaking down, removing, and rebuilding using the right lumber, brick, and mortar.
Let me further submit that the process theology I, and others, are developing releases the Christian God from the bondage of man's idolatrous images by placing God's Selfhood and Essence exactly where it needs to be. Thus and thus, Mr. Feinberg and all such arguments like his, as entertain here by parachurch organizations such as the Gospel Coalition are anathema and unhelpful to the follower in Christ Jesus.
I would rather those interested in process theology begin here at this site and not waste your time trying to find arguments to uphold unworthy Christian beliefs. I will gladly dissuade you of your presumptions little by little, post after post after post. And like my own journey please be aware it will take time to grasp. For myself, it took years of doubt and disagreement until landing where I am today (almost ten full years). But having taken the time to pursue the "Hound of Heaven" I am very glad now that I have.
Peace and blessings.
R.E. Slater
February 13, 2023
How the Traditional Church viewed Process Theology as seen here
in an older essay written by Evangelical Theology John S. Feinberg
* * * * * * * *
Recommended Websites
- Homebrewed Christianity - Podcasts, Books, Resources by Process Experts -
- https://trippfuller.com/category/podcast/
- The Center for Process Studies -
- https://ctr4process.org/about/
- Open and Relational Process Studies -
- https://thomasjayoord.com/
- Process Essays by R.E. Slater
- [Use the Indexes which list out some of the site's topic lists] -
- https://relevancy22.blogspot.com/search/label/Index%20-%20Process%20Essays%20by%20R.E.%20Slater
* * * * * * * *
Here is a list of Process Books by Process Thinkers
of the late 20th and early 21st Century

by (shelved 8 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.20 — 800 ratings — published 1929

by (shelved 6 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.80 — 180 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 5 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.17 — 267 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 5 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.88 — 103 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 4 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.13 — 83 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 4 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.15 — 39 ratings — published 1965

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.35 — 17 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.41 — 51 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.25 — 12 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.90 — 106 ratings — published 1983

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.20 — 5 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.11 — 45 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.08 — 1,211 ratings — published 1907

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.19 — 72 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.91 — 11 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.11 — 247 ratings — published 1933

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.08 — 119 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.14 — 104 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.14 — 235 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.11 — 54 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.17 — 36 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.36 — 42 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.41 — 196 ratings — published 1926

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.98 — 503 ratings — published 1926

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.32 — 105 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.17 — 12 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.06 — 204 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.96 — 23 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 3.80 — 40 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 2 times as process-theology)
avg rating 4.02 — 44 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.60 — 10 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.50 — 4 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.60 — 5 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.57 — 7 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.50 — 4 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 2.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.07 — 287 ratings — published 1934

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.12 — 16 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.55 — 142 ratings — published 1901

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.10 — 2,413 ratings — published 1896

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.89 — 632 ratings — published 1903

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.72 — 1,785 ratings — published 1900

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.71 — 58 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 3.78 — 231 ratings — published 1932

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.00 — 810 ratings — published 1889

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.18 — 44 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.50 — 10 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.63 — 141 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as process-theology)
avg rating 4.48 — 734 ratings — published
No comments:
Post a Comment