Whitehead and de Chardin
in Synthetic Thought
PART 6
by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT
March 31, 2025
I cannot elaborate enough that de Chardin's philosophic thought is more theological than philosophical making it more limited in its philosophical framework and pointedly specific in its ontology. As a Christian, I greatly sympathize with de Chardin's effort to Christologize all reality into the Person and Work of Christ (in de Chardin's terms, a cosmic Christogenesis of God's work). However, to be a sufficient metaphysic we must insist on Whitehead's process philosophy from which a processual theology can be derived.
I suspect Whitehead had a number of reasons for developing his philosophical structure but one of those reasons may have been his interest in providing a theistic framework on which to set a philosophical structure which might resonate not only with Christianity but perhaps with all religious affiliations. It is also one of the reasons I am attracted to Whitehead and have been furthering his work in the area of Process Theology. In affect, I am "de Chardin-izing" Whitehead without betraying Whitehead's integral structure (ahem, not "de" but "de-" as in the name).
Further, philosophy has always been the bedrock upon which theology rests. It is never the other way around. True, each may influence the other as I think of process philosophy had in it's influence on process theology (and, vice versa). So it is not inconceivable that as Whitehead developed his processual metaphysic and ontology he was also simultaneously birthing processual theology within his philosophic structure. Why? Because it is nearly impossible to betray our inner selves and Whitehead, if nothing else, was seeking concepts and words to describe God and God's universe as a 19th Century Victorian Christian (Feb 15, 1861 - Dec 30, 1947).
My further suspicion is that the French Jesuit priest, de Chardin, had placed first-and-foremost his Christian theology when creating a pseudo-philosophic structure around the primacy of Jesus Christ. Again, I applaud his view in this matter as I had been trained in my own theology to do the same thing. But again, it only goes one way: philosophy begets theology - and not the other way around. Hence, Whitehead's process-relational panentheistic philosophic structure always lies under Whitehead's process-based metaphysic of "Creativity" or "Creative Becoming" which is the most fundamental principle of reality.
Not the Person of Christ, nor a theistic force such as the Christian God, nor even God's very Self - but the abstract concept of "creativity". Creativity is the metaphysical condition which allows everything to "become" or "have the capacity of becoming." In Whitehead's words, "All actual occasions are expressions of creativity."
But from this metaphysical principle one may say that God is the Chief Actual Entity which embodies or exemplifies the metaphysical principle of "creativity." Which means that God holds all pure possibilities (sic, eternal objects); which are initial aims for each becoming event; and provides the very potentiality for any-and-all possibilities. Hence, God is the Ontological Exemplar of Creativity. Creativity would not be creativity if it were not for God. One could say that when God became so was birthed creativity; which correlates with Christian thought that God ever was and hence, so was creativity as a metaphysic principle or property.
Said in another way, in Whitehead, "creativity" is the metaphysical "stuff" of becoming but GOD is the clearest, most integrated and complete instance of creativity. Why? Because God initiates potentiality (the primordial nature of God); God feels all that is becoming (the Consequent nature of God); and God sustains all cosmic order and possibility over chaos. Thus and thus, God is the living embodiment of creativity - not outside or above it but its most elegant instantiation.
In summary, creativity is the ground of all becoming. Actual occasions are the localized expressions of creativity; and God is the exemplar of creativity - both uniquely expressing creativity's potentiality as well as its actualized relational fulfillment.
Creativity then is the language of philosophy expressing ideas; whereas theology is the language of personages such as a deity from which or whom ideas are expressed. Whitehead is creating a philosophic language in which theological language might be expressed.
Hence, creativity is not above God but God's mode of divine action. Nor is God less than creativity, but its personal, loving, and guiding reality; which is to say that God is both the heart and mind of creativity itself.
R.E. Slater
March 31, 2025
A Christian-Process Synthesis Statement:
- God is the divine wellspring from which all creative becoming flows.
- As the Loving Source, God envisions every possibility.
- As the Faithful Companion, God feels every outcome.
- As the Cosmic Christ, God draws all things forward in love and transformation.
No comments:
Post a Comment