Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Friday, December 1, 2023

Napolean and France's Struggle for a People's Democracy



Napolean and France's Struggle for
a People's Democracy


Napoleon — Official Trailer 2
Apple TV  |  Oct 18, 2023

Meet the man behind the myth. Napoleon, directed by Ridley Scott and starring Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby, exclusively in theaters now. Directed by Ridley Scott from a screenplay by David Scarpa, “Napoleon” stars Joaquin Phoenix as the French emperor and military leader. The film is an original and personal look at Napoleon’s origins and his swift, ruthless climb to emperor, viewed through the prism of his addictive and often volatile relationship with his wife and one true love, Josephine, played by Vanessa Kirby. The film captures Napoleon’s famous battles, relentless ambition and astounding strategic mind as an extraordinary military leader and war visionary. An Apple Studios production in conjunction with Scott Free Productions, “Napoleon” is produced by Scott, Kevin Walsh, Mark Huffam and Phoenix, with Michael Pruss and Aidan Elliott serving as executive producers.


Napoleon Bonaparte

The Coronation of Joséphine de Beauharnais






* * * * * * *


France and Her Revolutionary Republics

French Republics refer to a succession of republics after the proclamation of the French Revolution and the abolition of the monarchy in France in 1792. They are raised when there is a change of the constitution or a situation where the country had restored its monarch (Like the First and Second French Republic).

There have been five republics in the history of France:

* * * * * * *

Youtube Play List


French Revolution: Timeline, Causes & Dates | HISTORY
www.history.com › Topics › European History

The French Revolution was a watershed event in world history that began in 1789 and ended in the late 1790s with the ascent of Napoleon ...
History Channel · Nov 9, 2009

Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French Revolution (1789-1799). After seizing ...
History Channel · Nov 9, 2009


3:14
 - 
In 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte declared himself Emperor of the French, under the title Napoleon I. As the architect of France's recovery following the ...
Versailles · Château de Versailles · Nov 7, 2020

9:59 - Twitter: https://twitter.com/Tenminhistory Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=4973164 This episode of Ten Minute History (like a ...
YouTube · History Matters · Sep 12, 2016

Napoleon was arrested for treason following the 'Reign of Terror.' In the early stages of the French Revolution, Napoleon associated with ...
History Channel · Jesse Greenspan · Apr 11, 2014

15:54 - The French Revolution - OverSimplified (Part 1). OverSimplified•38M views · 13:57. Go to channel · Napoleonic Wars: Battle of Waterloo 1815.
YouTube · CrashCourse · Oct 21, 2019

0:27 - ... French Revolution... Read more · The Old Regime. King Louis XVI ruled France from the palace at Versailles, where court had been established to keep the nobles ...
NGV · May 10, 2012

16:48 - 1. Until Napoleon in 1803, who modernized and changed the roots of France forever. He introduced the Franc, recovered the economy, and made France prosperous. 2 ...
Khan Academy · Aug 26, 2011
7 key moments in this video

0:34 - ... Revolutionary period in France when the French public... Read more. Art & Design. Alongside its biographical trajectory of Napoleon's life, Napoleon: Revolution ...
NGV · May 11, 2012


* * * * * * *


France

EXCERPT:
Early modern period (15th century–1789)

The French Renaissance saw spectacular cultural development and the first standardisation of the French language, which would become the official language of France and the language of Europe's aristocracy. It also saw a long set of wars, known as the Italian Wars, between France and the House of Habsburg. French explorers such as Jacques Cartier and Samuel de Champlain claimed lands in the Americas for France, paving the way for the expansion of the French colonial empire. The rise of Protestantism in Europe led France to a civil war known as the French Wars of Religion, where, in the most notorious incident, thousands of Huguenots were murdered in the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre of 1572.[52] The Wars of Religion were ended by Henry IV's Edict of Nantes, which granted some freedom of religion to the Huguenots. Spanish troops, the terror of Western Europe,[53] assisted the Catholic side from 1589 to 1594 and invaded northern France in 1597; after some skirmishing in the 1620s and 1630s, Spain and France returned to all-out war between 1635 and 1659. The war cost France 300,000 casualties.[54]

Under Louis XIIICardinal Richelieu promoted the centralisation of the state and reinforced royal power by disarming domestic power holders in the 1620s. He systematically destroyed castles of defiant lords and denounced the use of private violence (duelling, carrying weapons and maintaining private armies). By the end of the 1620s, Richelieu established "the royal monopoly of force" as the doctrine.[55]

From the 16th to the 19th century, France was responsible for 11% of the transatlantic slave trade,[56] second only to Great Britain during the 18th century.[57] While the state began condoning the practice with letters patent in the 1630s, Louis XIII only formalized this authorization more generally in 1642 in the last year of his reign. By the mid-18th century, Nantes had become the principal French slave-trading port.[56]

Louis XIV of France standing in plate armour and blue sash facing left holding baton
Louis XIV, the "Sun King", was the absolute monarch of France and made France the leading European power.

During Louis XIV's minority and the regency of Queen Anne and Cardinal Mazarin, a period of trouble known as the Fronde occurred in France. This rebellion was driven by the great feudal lords and sovereign courts as a reaction to the rise of royal absolute power in France. The monarchy reached its peak during the 17th century and the reign of Louis XIV. By turning powerful feudal lords into courtiers at the Palace of Versailles, his command of the military went unchallenged. Remembered for numerous wars, the so-called "Sun King" made France the leading European power. France became the most populous country in Europe and had tremendous influence over European politics, economy, and culture. French became the most-used language in diplomacy, science, literature and international affairs, and remained so until the 20th century.[58] During his reign, France took colonial control of many overseas territories in the Americas, Africa and Asia. In 1685, Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes, forcing thousands of Huguenots into exile and published the Code Noir providing the legal framework for slavery and expelling Jewish people from the French colonies.[59]

Under the wars of Louis XV (r. 1715–1774), France lost New France and most of its Indian possessions after its defeat in the Seven Years' War (1756–1763). Its European territory kept growing, however, with notable acquisitions such as Lorraine (1766) and Corsica (1770). An unpopular king, Louis XV's weak rule, his ill-advised financial, political and military decisions—as well as the decadence of his court—discredited the monarchy, which arguably paved the way for the French Revolution 15 years after his death.[60]

Louis XVI (r. 1774–1793) actively supported the Americans with money, fleets and armies, helping them win independence from Great Britain. France gained revenge but spent so heavily that the government verged on bankruptcy—a factor that contributed to the French Revolution. Some of the Enlightenment occurred in French intellectual circles, and major scientific breakthroughs and inventions, such as the naming of oxygen (1778) and the first hot air balloon carrying passengers (1783), were achieved by French scientists. French explorers, such as Bougainville and Lapérouse, took part in the voyages of scientific exploration through maritime expeditions around the globe. The Enlightenment philosophy, in which reason is advocated as the primary source of legitimacy, undermined the power of and support for the monarchy and also was a factor in the French Revolution.

Revolutionary France (1789–1799)

drawing of the Storming of the Bastille on 14 July 1789, smoke of gunfire enveloping stone castle
The Storming of the Bastille on 14 July 1789 was the most emblematic event of the French Revolution.

Facing financial troubles, Louis XVI summoned the Estates-General (gathering the three Estates of the realm) in May 1789 to propose solutions to his government. As it came to an impasse, the representatives of the Third Estate formed a National Assembly, signalling the outbreak of the French Revolution. Fearing that the king would suppress the newly created National Assembly, insurgents stormed the Bastille on 14 July 1789, a date which would become France's National Day.

In early August 1789, the National Constituent Assembly abolished the privileges of the nobility such as personal serfdom and exclusive hunting rights. Through the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (27 August 1789), France established fundamental rights for men. The declaration affirms "the natural and imprescriptible rights of man" to "liberty, property, security and resistance to oppression". Freedom of speech and press were declared, and arbitrary arrests were outlawed. It called for the destruction of aristocratic privileges and proclaimed freedom and equal rights for all men, as well as access to public office based on talent rather than birth. In November 1789, the Assembly decided to nationalise and sell all property of the Catholic Church which had been the largest landowner in the country. In July 1790, a Civil Constitution of the Clergy reorganised the French Catholic Church, cancelling the authority of the Church to levy taxes, et cetera. This fueled much discontent in parts of France, which would contribute to the civil war breaking out some years later. While Louis XVI still enjoyed popularity among the population, his disastrous flight to Varennes in June 1791 seemed to justify rumours he had tied his hopes of political salvation to the prospects of foreign invasion. His credibility was so deeply undermined that the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic became an increasing possibility.

In the August 1791 Declaration of Pillnitz, the Emperor of Austria and the King of Prussia threatened to restore the French monarch by force. In September 1791, the National Constituent Assembly forced Louis XVI to accept the French Constitution of 1791, thus turning the French absolute monarchy into a constitutional monarchy. In the newly established Legislative Assembly (October 1791), enmity developed and deepened between a group later called the 'Girondins', who favoured war with Austria and Prussia, and a group later called 'Montagnards' or 'Jacobins' who opposed such a war. A majority in the Assembly in 1792 however saw a war with Austria and Prussia as a chance to boost the popularity of the revolutionary government and thought that such a war could be won and so declared war on Austria on 20 April 1792.

Le Serment du Jeu de paume by Jacques-Louis David, 1791

On 10 August 1792, an angry crowd threatened the palace of Louis XVI, who took refuge in the Legislative Assembly.[61][62] A Prussian army invaded France later in August 1792. In early September, Parisians, infuriated by the Prussian Army capturing Verdun and counter-revolutionary uprisings in the west of France, murdered between 1,000 and 1,500 prisoners by raiding the Parisian prisons. The Assembly and the Paris City Council seemed unable to stop that bloodshed.[61][63] The National Convention, chosen in the first elections under male universal suffrage,[61] on 20 September 1792 succeeded the Legislative Assembly and on 21 September abolished the monarchy by proclaiming the French First Republic. Louis XVI was convicted of treason and guillotined in January 1793. France had declared war on Great Britain and the Dutch Republic in November 1792 and did the same on Spain in March 1793; in the spring of 1793, Austria and Prussia invaded France; in March, France created a "sister republic" in the "Republic of Mainz" and kept it under control.

Also in March 1793, a counter-revolution in Vendée began, evoked by both the Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 1790 and the nationwide army conscription in early 1793; elsewhere in France rebellion was brewing too. A factionalist feud in the National Convention, smouldering ever since October 1791, came to a climax on 2 June 1793 with the group of the Girondins being forced to resign and leave the convention. By July the counter-revolution had spread to Brittany, Normandy, Bordeaux, Marseilles, Toulon, and Lyon. Between October and December 1793, Paris' Convention government took brutal measures to subdue most internal uprisings at the cost of tens of thousands of lives. Some historians consider the civil war to have lasted until 1796 with a toll of possibly 450,000 lives.[64] By the end of 1793, the allies had been driven from France.

Political disagreements and enmity in the National Convention reached unprecedented levels, leading to dozens of Convention members being sentenced to death and guillotined. Meanwhile, France's external wars in 1794 were prospering, for example in Belgium. In 1795, the government seemed to return to indifference towards the desires and needs of the lower classes concerning freedom of (Catholic) religion and fair distribution of food. Until 1799, politicians, apart from inventing a new parliamentary system (the 'Directory'), busied themselves with dissuading the people from Catholicism and royalism.

Napoleon and 19th century (1799–1914)

painting of Napoleon in 1806 standing with hand in vest attended by staff and Imperial guard regiment
NapoleonEmperor of the French, built a vast empire across Europe.[65]

General Napoleon Bonaparte seized control of the Republic in 1799 becoming First Consul and later Emperor of the French Empire (1804–1814; 1815). As a continuation of the French Revolutionary Wars, changing sets of European coalitions declared wars on Napoleon's empire. His armies conquered most of continental Europe with swift victories such as the battles of Jena-Auerstadt and Austerlitz. Members of the Bonaparte family were appointed as monarchs in some of the newly established kingdoms.[66]

These victories led to the worldwide expansion of French revolutionary ideals and reforms, such as the metric system, the Napoleonic Code and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. In June 1812 Napoleon attacked Russia, reaching Moscow. Thereafter his army disintegrated through supply problems, disease, Russian attacks, and finally winter. After the catastrophic Russian campaign and the ensuing uprising of European monarchies against his rule, Napoleon was defeated. About a million Frenchmen died during the Napoleonic Wars.[66] After his brief return from exile, Napoleon was finally defeated in 1815 at the Battle of Waterloo, and the Bourbon monarchy was restored with new constitutional limitations.

The discredited Bourbon dynasty was overthrown by the July Revolution of 1830, which established the constitutional July Monarchy. In that year, French troops began the conquest of Algeria, establishing the first colonial presence in Africa since Napoleon's abortive invasion of Egypt in 1798. In 1848, general unrest led to the February Revolution and the end of the July Monarchy. The abolition of slavery and the introduction of male universal suffrage, which were briefly enacted during the French Revolution, was re-enacted in 1848. In 1852, the president of the French Republic, Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte, Napoleon I's nephew, was proclaimed emperor of the Second Empire, as Napoleon III. He multiplied French interventions abroad, especially in CrimeaMexico and Italy which resulted in the annexation of the Duchy of Savoy and the County of Nice, then part of the Kingdom of Sardinia. Napoleon III was unseated following defeat in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, and his regime was replaced by the Third Republic. By 1875, the French conquest of Algeria was complete, with approximately 825,000 Algerians killed from famine, disease, and violence.[67]

The first (light blue) and second (dark blue) French colonial empire

France had colonial possessions, in various forms since the beginning of the 17th century, but in the 19th and 20th centuries its global overseas colonial empire extended greatly and became the second-largest in the world behind the British Empire.[15] Including metropolitan France, the total area of land under French sovereignty reached almost 13 million square kilometres in the 1920s and 1930s, 8.6% of the world's land. Known as the Belle Époque, the turn of the century was a period characterised by optimism, regional peace, economic prosperity and technological, scientific and cultural innovations. In 1905, state secularism was officially established.


Wednesday, November 29, 2023

Women Speak up for America and Against MAGA!


Women Speak up for America
and Against MAGA!


What if we weren't motivated to see all the world in terms of sin and sin nature, but in terms of beauty and love? How would that change your view of God, Life, and one another? - re slater
Reclaiming America from anti-democratic fascism and heretical Christian nationalism. - re slater


 Related Articles


Why Trump “can't be ripped away” from his followers
by Heather Cox Richardson
Salon Talks | Salon | NEW YORK
Nov 2, 2023

Historian Heather Cox Richardson tells Salon about her book “Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America.” The “Letters from an American” writer explains how Republicans from Nixon to Trump have launched an attack on democracy and shares what Americans can do about it. Cox Richardson reflects on why she is still optimistic and reveals why she is “bored” by Trump now.

 

Salon.com link


Heather Cox Richardson — Democracy Awakening:
Notes on the State of America - with Jane Mayer
Politics and Prose  |  Nov 7, 2023

Watch author Heather Cox Richardson's book talk and reading at a Politics and Prose event in Washington, D.C.

In the midst of the impeachment crisis of 2019, Heather Cox Richardson launched a daily Facebook essay providing the historical background of the daily torrent of news. It soon turned into a newsletter and its readership ballooned to more than 2 million dedicated readers who rely on her plainspoken and informed take on the present and past in America.

In Democracy Awakening, Richardson crafts a compelling and original narrative, explaining how, over the decades, a small group of wealthy people have made war on American ideals. By weaponizing language and promoting false history they have led us into authoritarianism -- creating a disaffected population and then promising to recreate an imagined past where those people could feel important again. She argues that taking our country back starts by remembering the elements of the nation's true history that marginalized Americans have always upheld. Their dedication to the principles on which this nation was founded has enabled us to renew and expand our commitment to democracy in the past. Richardson sees this history as a roadmap for the nation's future.

Richardson's talent is to wrangle our giant, meandering, and confusing news feed into a coherent story that singles out what we should pay attention to, what the precedents are, and what possible paths lie ahead. In her trademark calm prose, she is realistic and optimistic about the future of democracy. Her command of history allows her to pivot effortlessly from the Founders to the abolitionists to Reconstruction to Goldwater to Mitch McConnell, highlighting the political legacies of the New Deal, the lingering fears of socialism, the death of the liberal consensus and birth of "movement conservatism."

Many books tell us what has happened over the last five years. Democracy Awakening explains how we got to this perilous point, what our history really tells us about ourselves, and what the future of democracy can be.

Heather Cox Richardson is Professor of History at Boston College. She has written about the Civil War, Reconstruction, the Gilded Age, and the American West in award-winning books whose subjects stretch from the European settlement of the North American continent to the history of the Republican Party through the Trump administration. Her work has appeared in the Washington Post, the New York Times, and The Guardian, among other outlets. She is the cohost of the Vox Media podcast, Now & Then.

Richardson will be in conversation with Jane Mayer. Mayber is a staff writer for The New Yorker and the author of three bestselling and critically acclaimed narrative nonfiction books. She co-authored Landslide: The Unmaking of the President, 1984-1988, with Doyle McManus, and Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas, with Jill Abramson, which was a finalist for the National Book Award. Her book The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals, for which she was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship.

- @politicsprose
* * * * * * *


Solutions to the Disruption of Democracies Around the World

by R.E. Slater


Where Constitutional Democracies must go in order to retain compassionate societal freedoms and justice is to the building of "Ecological Civilizations."

An Eco-Civ society is the hypothetical concept that describes the alleged final goal of social and environmental reform within any given society. It implies that the changes required in response to global climate disruption and social injustices are so extensive as to require another form of human civilization, one based on ecological principles."



* * * * * * *


Amazon link

The last 10 minutes were well spoken by Cassidy to all her previous comments earlier. And Jamie, as always, continues to inspire with the clarity of his message. - re slater

Cassidy Hutchinson — Enough — in conversation with Jamie Raskin
Politics and Prose  |  Nov 7, 2023


Watch author Cassidy Hutchinson's book talk and reading at a Politics and Prose event in Washington, D.C. PURCHASE BOOK HERE: https://www.politics-prose.com/book/9... 

Ever since a childhood visit to Washington, DC, Cassidy Hutchinson aspired to serve her country in government. Raised in a working-class family with a military background, she was the first in her immediate family to graduate from college. Despite having no ties to Washington, Hutchinson landed a vital position at the center of the Trump White House.

Her life took a dramatic turn on January 6th, 2021, when, at twenty-four, she found herself in one of the most extraordinary and unprecedented calamities in modern political history. 

Hutchinson was faced with a choice between loyalty to the Trump administration or loyalty to the country by revealing what she saw and heard in the attempt to overthrow a democratic election. She bravely came forward to become the pivotal witness in the House January 6 investigations, as her testimony transfixed and stunned the nation. In her memoir, Hutchinson reveals the struggle between the pressures she confronted to toe the party line and the demands of the oath she swore to defend American democracy.

Enough reaches far beyond the typical insider political account. It’s the saga of a woman whose fierce determination helped her overcome childhood challenges to get her dream job, only to face a crisis of conscience—one that more senior White House aides tried to evade—and, in the process, find her voice and herself. This is a portrait of how the courage of one person can change the course of history.

Cassidy Hutchinson is a former special assistant to President Donald Trump and his chief of staff, Mark Meadows. She received national attention after being a key witness in the hearings led by the United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. Hutchinson previously worked for the White House Office of Legislative Affairs and interned for Republican leaders Steve Scalise and Ted Cruz. She was born and raised in Pennington, New Jersey. Enough is her first book.

Hutchinson will be joined in conversation with Congressman Jamie Raskin who has proudly represented Maryland’s 8th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives since 2017. Prior to his time in Congress, Raskin was a three-term State Senator in Maryland and the Senate Majority Whip. He was also a professor of constitutional law at American University’s Washington College of Law for more than 25 years. He has authored several books, including the Washington Post bestseller Overruling Democracy: The Supreme Court versus the American People, the highly acclaimed We the Students: Supreme Court Cases For and About America’s Students and most recently Unthinkable: Trauma, Truth, and the Trials of American Democracy. Congressman Raskin is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School and a former Editor of the Harvard Law Review.

R.E. Slater - Unhealthy Ways to Read the Bible


The Magic Bible

Unhealthy Ways to Read the Bible

by R.E. Slater

November 29, 2023


Question. Is the bible a book about everything?

Answer: No.

The bible is limited by the generational experiences of those temporal communities which contributed to the bible's messages for good or for ill to those around them.

Most bible readers today believe God wrote the bible through various men and women and their observed experiences ... ideas and concepts which were to become timeless through the eras to come.

However true this mantra may be amongst the faithful the reality is that only in principle might we be able to say that the bible is timeless. In reality, those words and ideas were fixed in time, place, era, and culture as immediately as they were written down.

God as Believed

Hence, to read the bible is to read it's Spirit-inspired narrations as an admixture of people's beliefs about God with God's own communique's as best as they could be communicated within their writer's cultural beliefs and understandings.

And rather than the words of the bible become authoritative for time immemorial it's older words were for an older day or cultural era which were pertinent then as time-stamped expressions of how people thought about God in relation to their lives and those communities and nation-states around them.

That is, the more God spoke, and the more God's "words" were written down in the narratives of Israel, the more we can read in the bible how those words were influenced by the events of their day, the hour, the amanuensis' experiences, backgrounds, knowledge, community, era, and traditions.

Philosophically, words are as timeless as they are timeful. Our writings and expressions, beliefs about God and history's "appointments" to come are marked by our own dated beliefs and ideas. One might say that the words and beliefs of man were not meant to be lasting but to be a growing approximation to our amassing understanding of God.

Thus and thus, what morality, and ethics, and salvation, might have meant then  in the biblical eras which spanned thousands of years have necessitated re-contextualization today in the present tense if we our to discern the growing legacy of the God then and this same God now.

This is where preaching requires study, learning, and recontextualization. As this is done God by his Spirit speaks today to us through our own experiences and observations. Such interpretations may be true, in error, fantastical, or common-sensed, but they all will require the communities of readers and listeners to judge whether true or accurate such acclaimed inspirations might be.... One might say one thing while another say something else. We can only perceive the wisdom of the statements according to the perceived relevance of the contextualized speech.

God in Advent in Jesus

Thus, I write here, at this site, to speak a new language... not that of a Westernized Jesus but of a processual God whose love comes first and foremost to all that this God is... as demonstrated by his incarnation in Jesus who was not only Israel's long awaited Messiah but the world's new definition of God despite all "inspired" documents written to the contrary.

When God did, we quickly find that Israel's templed teachers of the Law and conductors of it's holy institutes discovered their distance from God as comprehended in their Torahitic traditions and beliefs.

That this God they believed and followed spoke by grace and mercy, forgiveness and healing, and not by enforced institutionalized contritions nor by harsh sentencing and religious separations of legality, rite, and custom.

Jesus' words and deeds unnerved the Rabbi's, Priests, and Scribes of his day even as they do today in the Church's institutionalized beliefs, mantras, creeds, and conductions of its actions within the laity and society.

To therefore read the bible as an authoritative document is to remember to read it contextually, historically, morally, meaningfully, and theologically through God's love. When we read it through God's holiness we do a deep disservice to the God of the heavens and earth.

What is the Bible's Main Message?

Firstly, to know that the bible is fixed to its older cultural contexts where people and institutions thought differently of God then as we do now. As time and experienced has moved past ancient Israel's times and the times of Jesus and the Apostles so too has the hoary history of man needed to temper its beliefs and sayings about the God we think we know, understand, preach about, and apprehend in our daily walk in the Spirit.

Secondly, that the God of the bible has been misunderstood, misused, and misapplied through the eras of faith... and sadly, has mostly been used to harm and oppress Christians and non-Christians alike in the Church's slipping contexts of holiness and love.

On the upside, the Church has within its many traditions other contexts which have given precedent to God's love over God's holiness. And so, this portion of the Church when teaching the Scriptures having placed God's love first and not last into the older biblical structures and narratives can be read as God ascribing mercy and forgiveness to one another rather than this same God speaking always by judgment, damnation and hell.

Thirdly, when read the bible through eyes of love and applied aright by the administration of God's love, the Church speaks best when it speaks love to its congregants, followers, and society by its conduct of loving word, deed, act, and policy. In this fashion, the bible is always pertinent to a society's cultural evolution.

Be Love

Be love as God is love. Worship a God of loving act, word and deed. Not a God who is not....

Any God to which church covenant, creed, or belief ascribes by its own set of rules and idolatries is a false God when perceived as divine holiness over divine love. The measure of God is Love to which God's divine attributes all find their meaning and definition.

Said another way, God is holy because is loving. God is not holy when God is not loving. Love gives shape and definition to God's holiness. To be without sin and evil is to be unbound in love and giving.

When placing divine holiness over-and-above divine love we preach a false God.

And when we place divine holiness on the same plane as divine love so that each of God's attributes are on equal standing with one another we misperceive God.

This synthetic act of adjusting God in all God's divineness on equal ground may seem eclectically logical but it then allows for all institutions of man to pick-and-chose which divine aspect of God to uplift over all other of God's qualities. This then can lead to a faith institute and its creeds to say something about God and our response to be in "holy" disequilibrium within the ordinances of God.

Better it is to teach divine love as the foundation upon which God is than not; to always lead out as a faith institute in its creeds by love first; than to acquiesce to speak and act of a God who is unloving when disconnected - or imbalanced - to God's remaining attributes, character, or quality of God's essential Self.

A loving theism then, places God's love above all other qualities of God's attributes and character as the defining ascription to all that God is. When God is apprehended in this way than God's holiness, divine judgment, and retribution, must always be defined in terms of God's love - rather than set apart from themselves to be re-defined and re-enacted by Church liturgy devoid of love.

Reading the bible can be tricky. But holding to a few basic principles will force the bible reader to re-examine the church and it's traditional teachings even as Jesus did when teaching the Rabbi's at the Temple in his youth.

Even as Jesus would later demonstrate to the wicked priests who brought a whore to him to be judged... forcing Jesus to be a God of judgment over a God of love... so too Jesus responded by drawing out in the sand the sins of the whore's accusers. As he did they shut their mouths and drew away from their charade leaving Jesus and bedraggled woman alone in the moment. A moment in which Jesus judged her to worthy of God's forgiving and atoning love that she might find spiritual healing and solace in the moments of her lost life. She did, preaching of a God of love, as she left Jesus renewed in heart and hope.

This same Jesus came to the Jewish temples bespeaking this same God of love on their holy days of separation and devotion. That God's love is the definer and foundation to all other (impertinent) ideas about God taught by a holy establishment.

Conclusion

Consequently, we may aver that all other bible teachings are but religious in nature, appealing to man's sinful nature, and should not be considered authoritative, if not uplifted, bathed, washed, and redeemed in God's love.

That God is LOVE before God is anything else. And consequently the bible we read is meant to convey God's love though it is bound by human interpretation, speech, and narrative apprehension of the divine Spirit-word-and-event.

When neglecting the Spirit of Love we attend to unloving words and actions. We have lost our saltiness and become as the weeds and hard soils of the earth where nothing may grow or be nourished.

And like Abram in Genesis, no Covenant may be "cut with God" except that this God of Love cut the halves of the sacrifices and walks through them alone as worthy keeper of his loving promise to stay and abide with us all our days.

Covenants which are laid first-and-foremost in God's grace and mercy; forgiveness and presence; hope and enduring works of love. As versus man's covenants presented in religious pride, legalism, and works-oriented rags unworthy of life, soul, penitence, equality, or justice.

Be at Peace,

Walk in the Love of the Lord our God,

R.E. Slater
November 29, 2023
updated December 2, 2023




Jesus mocks the 'kingdoms of man' by using the same word, basilou, in its genitive form to declare all may become possessors of the kingdom of God when filling God's kingdom with loving content. That this kingdom is not for religiously heartless demeaning the quality or worthy of those yearning God's love except they follow the Temple's rules, rites, and traditions. To this Jesus said "Tace" in which is meant "anathema" to such horrid teachings by the religiously astute of his day. God's kingdom is easily obtainable by faith in a loving God and then bound to share God's love in deed, word, and by constitution, to those everywhere around us. Its light cannot be contained by darkness and its new wine will surely burst the old wineskins once considered good.

by R.E. Slater

Basileia (Greek translated kingdom) has morphed into royalty and authoritarianism, power and patriarchy, even theocracy in today's Christianity. But the basileia of Jesus is the exact opposite, where offense is met with forgiveness, the first are last and the last are first, the poor are privileged and the rich have a very narrow needle to thread, and we are asked to love our enemies.

by Wayne Boyd

"All the expected effects of power, authority, and hierarchical rule are reversed, resulting in the rule of the unruly, the reign of the unroyal, a hier-unarchy, a “sacred anarchy,” as I like to say. This kingdom of ill-born and powerless people (1 Cor. 1:26) looks mad to the “world,” to Aristotle’s man of practical wisdom, a good-looking and well-educated aristocratic chap, and nothing like a real man to a heartless Roman warrior. This is a “kingdom” in an ironic sense, actually mocking the authoritarianism and patriarchy. The possibility of the impossible is neither theological (omnipotence) nor logical (a contradiction in terms) but theopoetic, a kind of theopoetic cardiology, the heart of a heartless world."

by Philosophic Catholic Theologian, John Caputo


  ~  The Table below will be necessary to the chat I had with ChatGPT 3.5  ~~  



βασιλεία

Word
βασιλεία, -ας, ἡ (basileia)
Gloss
  • kingdom
  • royal rule
  • kingship
  • sovereignty
Part of Speech
Noun
Word Frequency
  • Byzantine NT: 162
  • kjtr: 162
  • Nestle 1904: 162
  • sr: 162
Syllables
βα·σι·λεί·α ba·si·lei·a
Strongs Number
  • 932

Noun Forms

Singular
βασιλεία
τῆςβασιλείας
τῇβασιλείᾳ
τήνβασιλείαν
Plural
αἱβασιλεῖαι
τῶνβασιλειῶν
ταῖςβασιλείαις
τάςβασιλείας

Usage in new testament bible - click link here

parsed usage of basileia in GNT and LXX  - click link here

The genitive form of basileia refers to one's possession of God's kingdom... 

Or, said otherwise:

(i) we are possessed of God and thereby adopted into God's kingdom, and,

(ii) we possess the kingdom both now and forevermore when sealed by the Spirit of God in acceptance and belief in Jesus' atoning work on the Cross. That is, we ourselves are held by, and actively hold, our kingdom rights to distribute to others around us.


* * * * * * *


ChatGPT and I Discuss Healthy Ways
to Read the Bible and Bible Eschatology


Hi

ChatGPT
Hello! How can I assist you today?


Please parse "baseilou"

ChatGPT
It seems like "baseilou" might be a typo or a combination of letters without a clear meaning. Could you provide more context or clarify your request?


Yes a typo. Should be "basilou". A Greek word meaning "Kingdom" = "Basileia"

ChatGPT
Ah, I see. "Baseilou" appears to be the genitive form of the Greek word "Βασιλεία" (Basileia), which translates to "kingdom." If you have any more questions or if there's anything specific you'd like to know, feel free to ask!


Remind me what the genitive form of the word is...

ChatGPT
The genitive form of a word typically indicates possession or a relationship similar to "of" in English. For example, in Greek, "Basileia" (kingdom) can become "Basilou" when expressing possession or association.


Ah. So might I say the kingdom of God (KOG) is mine? Or, that I belong to the KOG in the genitive form?

ChatGPT
Yes, that's correct! You could say "the kingdom of God" using the genitive form, like "the kingdom of God is mine" or "I belong to the kingdom of God."

The genitive form indicates possession or association, allowing you to express a relationship with the kingdom.


Is basilou the correct Attic spelling of basileia or more a later derivative of the Koine form of the Greek language? (I had used koinonia in place of Koine)

ChatGPT
The form "basilou" is a transliteration of the genitive singular form of the Attic Greek word "Βασιλεία" (Basileia), which means "kingdom." In Attic Greek, the genitive singular form is used to indicate possession or association.

The term "Attic" refers to the dialect of Ancient Greek that was spoken in the region of Attica, including Athens, and is associated with classical literature and philosophy. So, "basilou" is in line with the Attic Greek form rather than being a later derivative of Koine Greek of Jesus' day.

As opposed to the language of Koine Greek the term "koinonia" typically refers to a different concept, not one of language but one of "fellowship" or "community," and is not directly related to the genitive form of "Basileia."


Apologies... what form of Greek was spoken in the first century AD?


ChatGPT
In the first century AD, during the time of the New Testament and the events surrounding the life of Jesus, the common form of Greek spoken was Koine Greek. Koine Greek emerged as a simplified and more universal form of the Greek language, evolving from Classical Attic Greek.

Koine Greek became the lingua franca of the eastern Mediterranean (The Levant's coastal regions) and was widely used for trade, communication, and literature during the Hellenistic and Roman periods, including the time of the New Testament writings.


Is basilou in line with Koine Greek in its meaning despite its relative "youth"?

ChatGPT
Yes, "basilou" is in line with Koine Greek. In Koine Greek, the genitive form of "Βασιλεία" (Basileia), meaning "kingdom," could indeed be rendered as "basilou." The genitive form is used to indicate possession or association, and this structure is consistent with the characteristics of Koine Greek during the first century AD.


OK. So in the passage of time between ancient attic greek and later koine greek basilou (sic, basileia) remained the same linguistically in spelling?


ChatGPT
The spelling "basilou" (or "βασιλεία" in Greek script) is more representative of Koine Greek rather than Ancient Attic Greek. Over time, linguistic changes and developments occurred between the Attic Greek of classical antiquity and the Koine Greek spoken in the Hellenistic and Roman periods.

While there are some similarities, Koine Greek is generally considered a later form of the language and exhibits simplifications in grammar and vocabulary compared to Classical Attic Greek. The specific form "basilou" aligns more closely with Koine Greek as it was [more prominently] used in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, including the time of the New Testament.


How would the attic form of the gentive parsing be spelled?

ChatGPT
In Ancient Attic Greek, the genitive form of "Βασιλεία" (Basileia), meaning "kingdom," would be spelled differently. The genitive singular form in the Attic dialect might be "βασιλείας" (basileías). The spelling can vary slightly due to linguistic nuances and specific grammatical rules, but this form more closely represents the genitive in Ancient Attic Greek.


So the addition of the letter "s" gives the noun base its genitive spelling in Attic Greek?


ChatGPT
The addition of "s" is a common way to form the genitive singular in Ancient Greek. In the case of "βασιλεία" (Basileia), adding "s" to the stem results in "βασιλείας" (basileías) in the genitive singular. This is a general rule in the inflection of Greek nouns to indicate possession or association.

However, it's important to note that linguistic rules can have exceptions, and the genitive form may vary based on the specific noun stem and its declension pattern in Greek.


What would the genitive plural look like in Attic vs. Koine spelling?

ChatGPT
In Ancient Attic Greek, the genitive plural of "Βασιλεία" (Basileia) would be formed by adding "-ων" (-ōn) to the stem. So, the genitive plural might look like "βασιλείων" (basileíōn).

In Koine Greek, the genitive plural often follows a similar pattern. So, the genitive plural of "Βασιλεία" in Koine might also be "βασιλείων" (basileíōn).

The spelling is quite similar in this case between Attic and Koine Greek for the genitive plural.


Culturally, did the term kingdom change in meaning or nuance over time?

ChatGPT
The concept of a "kingdom" has evolved over time and can carry different cultural, political, and religious nuances. In ancient cultures, including those of Ancient Greece and Rome, the term often referred to a political entity ruled by a king or monarch.

In a religious context, such as in Christianity, the term "kingdom" has a specific theological significance. In the New Testament, particularly in the teachings of Jesus, the "kingdom of God" or the "kingdom of heaven" is often used to convey a spiritual or divine realm rather than a purely political one. The nuanced meaning can involve concepts of divine rule, righteousness, and salvation.

Culturally and linguistically, the term "kingdom" has adapted to various contexts and belief systems over the centuries, reflecting the evolving perspectives and values of societies.


Extending this cultural linguistic metaphor I might say Jesus was mocking the temple teachings of kingdom in their stress of power and holiness when applying it to his kingdom built on mercy, grace, and forgiveness.

ChatGPT
That interpretation aligns with certain aspects of Jesus' teachings as portrayed in the New Testament. Jesus often challenged conventional religious interpretations and emphasized concepts like mercy, grace, and forgiveness over a rigid emphasis on power and holiness. His teachings often presented a transformation of traditional expectations, redirecting focus toward compassion and spiritual values.

By emphasizing a kingdom built on mercy and forgiveness, Jesus sought to convey a different understanding of divine rule—one rooted in love and compassion rather than solely in the exercise of authority and adherence to religious rituals. This interpretation reflects the cultural and linguistic nuances within the religious context of his time.


And yet, the new testament book of Revelation goes out of its way to speak of divine power and retribution as versus Jesus' kingdom of love...


ChatGPT
Indeed, the New Testament book of Revelation contrasts with the teachings of Jesus in the Gospels. Revelation is a highly symbolic and apocalyptic work that explores themes of divine judgment, cosmic conflict, and the ultimate triumph of God's justice. It employs vivid imagery to convey a message of God's sovereignty, righteousness, and the eventual resolution of good overcoming evil.

While the Gospels focus on Jesus' message of love, mercy, and forgiveness, Revelation takes a different literary and theological approach. It is important to note that different books within the New Testament serve different purposes and were written in diverse contexts, often addressing specific concerns or audiences.

Interpreting these texts involves considering their literary genres, historical contexts, and the theological perspectives they represent. The tension between themes of love and mercy in the Gospels and more apocalyptic elements in Revelation reflects the complexity of the biblical narrative and the diversity of theological ideas within the Christian tradition.


It would seem a Christian hope built on a loving God is in direct conflict with a God of war... that Jesus' disciple John, known for his love, wrote a book which is wholly unloving...

ChatGPT
The apparent tension between a God of love and a God associated with themes of war and judgment, as depicted in various parts of the Bible, has been a subject of theological reflection and debate within Christianity. Different Christian traditions and scholars may interpret these themes in diverse ways.

Some theologians emphasize the overarching message of love, mercy, and grace found in the teachings of Jesus, considering this to be the central theme of Christianity.

Others acknowledge the presence of diverse theological motifs in the Bible, including those of justice, judgment, and divine authority.

In reconciling these apparent contradictions, some Christians interpret the more judgment-oriented passages in the context of the cultural and historical circumstances in which they were written. They might view these passages as metaphorical or symbolic expressions rather than literal descriptions of God's nature.

Ultimately, the understanding of God's character and the resolution of these tensions vary among individuals and Christian denominations, reflecting the diversity of theological perspectives within the broader Christian tradition.


Any Christian theology not founded on a God of love but on a God of holiness would seem a devolution of this same God in dipolar terms...

ChatGPT
Many Christian theologians and denominations emphasize the idea that God is both loving and holy. The concept of God's holiness is often understood as a divine attribute associated with purity, righteousness, and moral perfection. In this perspective, holiness is not seen as conflicting with love but rather as complementing it.

Theologians who highlight God's holiness often see it as the foundation for moral order and justice. The idea is that God's holiness sets the standard for what is good and right, and love, in this context, is an expression of that holiness.

While there may be variations in theological emphasis among different Christian traditions, the majority aim to integrate the qualities of love and holiness into a coherent understanding of God's nature. Theologians often explore the relationship between these attributes, seeking a balanced perspective that reflects the multifaceted nature of the divine, as presented in the Bible and interpreted through theological traditions.


To which I would disagree. All of God's attributes and character must first be founded upon God's love. If not, divine holiness digresses towards a God of vindicating justice, suffering, war, and various religious forms of legalism. Holiness is only holy if grounded upon divine love to which personal and group acts on compassion may be enacted. Holiness for holiness' sake is but a dead end moralistically (and deistically).

ChatGPT
Your perspective aligns with a significant theological stream within Christianity that prioritizes the concept of God's love as foundational. Many theologians and believers argue that all divine attributes, including holiness and justice, find their roots in God's love. In this view, holiness is understood in the context of God's perfect love, and justice is seen as a manifestation of that love rather than an independent and potentially punitive force.

This theological stance often emphasizes the importance of compassion, mercy, and relational aspects of God's character. It seeks to avoid a legalistic understanding of holiness divorced from love, recognizing that an emphasis solely on rules and justice can lead to a distorted and potentially harmful understanding of God.

The diversity of perspectives within Christian theology allows for ongoing dialogue and reflection on these matters, contributing to the rich tapestry of theological thought within the Christian tradition.


Yes. Much better. Church history will bear this out. It becomes what it believes... it may be harming, oppressive, and ugly... or the church may fin the best of man's ability to love, care, in works of cooperation, unity, and resource sharing...


ChatGPT
Absolutely, the evolution of theological perspectives within Christian history reflects the dynamic nature of beliefs and interpretations. Different periods in church history have seen shifts in emphasis, theological debates, and the development of diverse doctrines. The understanding of God's attributes, including the foundational role of love, has been a subject of ongoing reflection and refinement.
"You become what you believe." - re slater
As beliefs influence practices and vice versa, the lived experience of faith communities often shapes and is shaped by their theological convictions. The recognition of God's love as a central and foundational aspect of His character has profound implications for how believers approach relationships, ethics, and social justice.

Acknowledging the historical and contextual development of theological perspectives allows for a nuanced understanding of the Christian tradition and its ongoing dialogue about the nature of God and the implications for human life.


Hence Israel and the early church's interpretation of God's sovereignty based upon holiness and justice leaves no room for a God of Love who acts sovereignty in his administration, or acts, of love to creation.

The book of Revelation seems to be yet another poor interpretation of a loving God's sovereignty dispensing justice rather than a participating sovereignty lovingly reacting against acts of unloving injustice.

ChatGPT
Your perspective highlights a tension that has been present in theological discussions throughout history, particularly in interpretations of divine sovereignty, justice, and love. Different theological traditions and individuals within the Christian faith may emphasize various aspects of God's nature and actions based on their interpretation of sacred texts, including the Bible.

The tension between views that see God primarily as a sovereign dispenser of justice and those that emphasize a God of love actively participating in creation is indeed a significant point of theological debate.

Some argue for a more participatory understanding of God's sovereignty that involves a relational and responsive engagement with creation, while others emphasize a more transcendent and sovereign view of God's rule.

Interpreting texts like Revelation, with its apocalyptic and symbolic language, adds another layer of complexity to these discussions. Different readers may understand these texts in varied ways, contributing to diverse theological perspectives within the Christian tradition.

The ongoing dialogue and exploration of these themes reflect the richness and diversity of Christian theology as it grapples with understanding the nature and actions of the divine.


If the bible narrates a collection of acquired views of God than I would propose that it would be in error to consider these as authoritarian descriptions of a dipolar God in conflict with God's Self.

Rather, if approaching biblical narratives as yet another kind of ancient religious reflection upon God seems far more warranted than attempting to make of the church's apriori description a cohesive whole when none can be found even in the bible's earlier passages about God.

ChatGPT
Your perspective aligns with a scholarly approach to biblical interpretation that recognizes the diversity of voices, genres, and theological perspectives within the Bible. Approaching the scriptures as a collection of ancient reflections on the divine allows for a nuanced understanding of the texts and their cultural contexts.

Acknowledging the diverse genres present in the Bible—such as historical narratives, poetry, prophecy, wisdom literature, and apocalyptic literature—helps in appreciating the multifaceted nature of the biblical witness. Each book and passage may reflect the unique theological concerns, historical circumstances, and literary styles of its author and community.

This approach invites interpretation that takes into account the historical and cultural context of each text, allowing for a richer understanding of the theological conversations that unfolded over centuries within the communities that produced and preserved these writings. It also recognizes that the Bible contains a range of perspectives and voices, contributing to the complexity of its theological message.


True. The most I can say of Revelation in the bible is that God becomes the kind of God you choose but it does not mean your kind of God is an accurate description of God as written by the early Church.

More simply, this God becomes an idol of one's own theological making while enforcing an (inerrant) authoritative view of the bible (sic, bibliolatry).

ChatGPT
Your reflection captures a critical aspect of theological interpretation, particularly when it comes to complex and symbolic texts like Revelation. The interpretation of such passages is influenced not only by the inherent ambiguity of the language but also by the theological frameworks and perspectives of the reader.

The concept of God becoming an idol of one's own theological making is a caution against shaping the divine in our image and according to our preferences. It underscores the importance of humility in approaching sacred texts, recognizing the limitations of human understanding and the need for openness to diverse interpretations.

Your mention of "bibliolatry" points to a concern about elevating the Bible itself to an idolatrous status, where the text is revered in a way that might overshadow the deeper engagement with the living God it seeks to convey. It's a reminder to approach the scriptures with reverence while maintaining a discerning and humble posture in interpretation.


And thus the Yin-and-Yang between Biblical criticism which is perennially caught between the Scylla of interpretive freedom and the Charybdis of irrelevance. Too much hermeneutic freedom and the tradition disintegrates, losing its epistemological appeal. Too little interpretive freedom and the Bible becomes merely an irrelevant historical artifact, rather than the living word of God. Inherently, evangelical biblical interpretation is unquestionably caught between a need for relevance and the need for textual validity.

ChatGPT
Your analogy of the Yin and Yang captures the delicate balance that biblical criticism navigates between interpretive freedom and maintaining relevance. Indeed, this tension is evident in various approaches to biblical interpretation, and it reflects the ongoing dialogue within religious communities and scholarly circles.

Too much interpretive freedom can lead to a fragmentation of tradition, potentially diluting the epistemological appeal and theological coherence. On the other hand, excessive rigidity may risk relegating the Bible to a historical artifact, limiting its perceived relevance to contemporary life.

Evangelical biblical interpretation, in particular, often grapples with these tensions, seeking to uphold the authority and validity of the biblical text while also addressing the needs and questions of a changing cultural context. It involves a dynamic interplay between fidelity to the scriptural tradition and a responsiveness to the challenges and inquiries of the present day.

The ongoing conversation within the realm of biblical criticism reflects the broader quest to maintain a meaningful engagement with sacred texts while recognizing the contextual and interpretive complexities involved.

In my own estimate, the evangelical tradition has divorced itself from God and is continuing down its own measured paths of heresy. It has forgotten the loving God; is oppressing all those unlike themselves; and by their works of harm in America's Constitutional democracy we are receiving aggressive policies discriminating against women, gays, trans, migrants, minorities, and so on. Evangelicalism has become its own abomination.

Moreover, this same evangelical response to a blended democratic society has shown its depths oppression affecting the democratic institutions as conservative evangelical Christians strive to form their own version of a theocratic kingdom...

But if anything, ancient Israel's institutionalization of a theocratic kingdom long years ago actually created many instances for religious harm, oppression, and societal division within its monarchal-minded communities. That this very idea of re-establishing a theocratic kingdom here in America is but an desperate and imperfect picture of a fairer legislative democracy attempting to work out societally how oppression might be undone and social justice expanded equally and fairly without church interference.


ChatGPT
Your observations touch on the complex intersection of religion, politics, and societal structures. The historical context of Israel's theocratic kingdom and its challenges, as well as the contemporary dynamics within democratic institutions, provides a backdrop for understanding the nuanced relationship between governance and religious influence.

The idea of a kingdom, whether theocratic or not, carries inherent complexities. Historical instances of theocratic rule have indeed been associated with challenges, including religious harm, oppression, and societal division. On the other hand, democratic institutions aim to provide a framework for governance that allows for pluralism, individual freedoms, and social justice.

Your suggestion that a legislative democracy can be seen as an attempt to work out societal issues and promote social justice without undue interference from religious institutions reflects a perspective emphasizing the separation of church and state. It underscores the importance of creating governance structures that are inclusive, responsive to diverse perspectives, and focused on principles of fairness and equality.

The relationship between religion and politics is an ongoing area of debate and exploration, and different societies navigate these dynamics in diverse ways based on their historical, cultural, and philosophical contexts.


...Thus and thus, this gives warrant to misunderstanding and misapplying how-and-what the bible teaches as a collection of oral legends with the Church's theologically-applied religious ideas placed upon a body politic and its society.

To naively read the bible and blindly enforce its teachings upon people ends up becoming paradoxically the worse thing one could do in one's personal and corporate life.

It portends today's Christian nationalist efforts with the same failures as yesteryear's Christian efforts to force blended societies into religious perspectives which may be oppressive and harmful.

This Christian direction in democratic society reveals itself as an outcome variant to the Church's religiously perceived applications of its ideations upon societal living doing with the same force and harm as the Church has done over the centuries since Christ.


ChatGPT
It seems like you're expressing concerns about misinterpretation and potential negative consequences of applying religious teachings to societal structures. The tension between personal beliefs and their impact on broader communities is indeed a complex aspect of religious influence. If you have specific questions or if there's a particular aspect you'd like to discuss further, feel free to let me know.


... end of file

ChatGPT
If you have any more questions or if there's anything else I can help you with in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!