Evolution of Worship & Religion: Part IV - The Sacred Made Universal (9)

The Evolution of Worship and Religion:

From Cosmic Awe to Processual Faith

A Metamodern Journey through the History of the Sacred

THE SACRED MADE UNIVERSAL

PART IV - ESSAY  9

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

In the beginning, there was wonder.

And wonder is where worship began.

---

PART IV

SYNTHESIS & TRANSCENDENCE:

The Sacred Made Universal

Essay 9 - The Age of Universal Religions

• Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam as global movements of inner transformation.
• The humanization of divinity: compassion as the new sacred law.
• Mysticism, incarnation, and surrender as the universal triad of worship.
• Empires of faith and the paradox of universality and control.

Essay 10 - Modernity and the Eclipse of the Sacred

• The Enlightenment’s rational rebellion against myth.
• Science, humanism, and secularization: new gods of reason.
• The disenchanted cosmos and the crisis of meaning.
• Nietzsche’s “death of God” as call to recreate the sacred from within.

Essay 11 - The Rebirth of the Sacred: Process, Panentheism, and the Pluriverse

• Whitehead, Teilhard, and the rediscovery of cosmic consciousness.
• Worship as participation in divine creativity, not obedience to decree.
• From anthropocentric religion to planetary spirituality.
• A metamodern synthesis: faith beyond dogma, reverence beyond creed.

---

Essay 9

The Age of Universal Religions

When the sacred could no longer

be carried by land or blood,

it learned to travel within the human heart.

It was then that the sacred became universal -

not when it conquered the world,

but when it entered humanity's conscience.

Religion survived not by fixing itself in stone -

but by becoming a way of transformation

across time, space, and human condition.

R.E. Slater

December 28, 2025

 

---

Author's Opening Statement

As the preceding essays have shown, the religious imagination of humanity has never been static. It unfolds across millennia, shaped by environment, social organization, symbolic cognition, and the deepening of human self-awareness. Yet even within this immense diversity of forms, a persistent pattern remains: human communities repeatedly seek to name, encounter, and align themselves with a reality they perceive as greater than themselves.

It is here that I must make my own standpoint transparent. If given the choice between interpreting the world as bereft of meaning or as infused with significance, I incline toward faith. I do so not as an escape from critical inquiry but as its companion to historical precedent, trusting that the long arc of human religious development may reflect not mere projection but a genuine encounter with the depths of existence.

The aim in the pages that follow - as it was in earlier essays on this topic - is not to privilege any single religious tradition nor to argue for one definitive expression of the sacred. Rather, it is to explore how the diverse trajectories of human religiosity - prehistoric, ancient, and modern - may be understood as evolving responses to a relational and dynamic cosmos. The theological perspective I bring, shaped by process thought, views divinity not as a static absolute but as a living presence that participates in the unfolding of the world, inviting creativity, compassion, and transformation.

Readers need not share this orientation. The preceding essays stand on their own anthropological and historical foundations. But for those who, like myself, see in the human longing for meaning a resonant truth rather than a misstep, the next stage of this project offers a constructive framework: one that honors the plural paths by which different cultures have sought the sacred and one which interprets these paths as diverse expressions of an evolving, relational faith as seen through the eyes of process theology.

Part IV therefore marks a transition - from describing the evolution of religious consciousness to considering its theological implications. It is an attempt to articulate how an evolving cosmos might invite evolving forms of faith, and how such faith might remain open, plural, and deeply human while still grounded in the possibility of a divine presence moving within and through a world of enculturating pluralism.

---

Preface

By the first millennium BCE into the early centuries CE, human religiosity underwent a decisive transformation. For the first time, movements emerged that offered a path not only for one tribe or one city but for all people, irrespective of ancestry, geography, or social station. Buddhism, Christianity, and later, Islam (610 CE), articulated universal moral visions, interior practices, and cosmological narratives that invited humanity into a widened horizon of belonging.

This essay examines these developments not as isolated theological breakthroughs, but as expressions of deeper historical forces:

• increasing mobility and cultural contact,
• the rise of empires and transregional networks,
• expanding literacy and philosophical reflection, and
• the intensification of personal ethical self-scrutiny.

These universal religions did not supersede older traditions so much as reinterpret them for a world now marked by pluralism and mobility. They introduced the possibility that ultimate reality could be approached through compassion, self-giving, and inward transformation - offering a spiritual grammar capable of crossing linguistic, political, and cultural boundaries.

---

Introduction: When the Sacred Became Portable

Across the long arc traced in the preceding essays, the sacred has appeared in many guises: as ancestral presence, territorial power, cosmic hierarchy, covenantal law, and moral command. In its earliest forms, divinity was inseparable from place - this mountain, that river, this city, that people. Gods were local because life was local. Identity was inherited, boundaries were fixed, and meaning was bound to land, bloodline, and memory.

However, by the middle of the first millennium BCE, the human story had changed. Trade routes stitched continents together. Empires displaced villages. Exile, migration, and conquest fractured inherited identities. No longer could the sacred remain confined to a single soil or sanctuary. If it were to endure, it would have to travel.

The religions that emerged during this period - most notably Buddhism, Christianity, and later Islam - represent a decisive shift in the grammar of the sacred. For the first time in human history, spiritual belonging was no longer primarily inherited but invited. One did not need to be born into the right people, stand on the right land, or serve the right king to participate in ultimate meaning. The sacred was no longer fixed to territory or tribe; it became portable, capable of being carried within persons and communities across cultural and geographic boundaries.

This was not merely a theological development. It was an anthropological and civilizational transformation. Religion began to speak in universal moral terms, to address the inner life of the individual, and to imagine a form of belonging that could transcend political borders and ethnic distinctions. In doing so, it redefined what it meant to be human in relation to the cosmos.

---

I. From Tribal Covenant to Universal Path

The religions of the ancient Near East - as traced through essays 1-8 (including 4 background essays and, at present, 9 supplemental essays) - were deeply embedded in social and political order. Divine authority mirrored royal authority; covenant mirrored treaty; worship stabilized hierarchy. Even ethical developments - justice, mercy, and care for the vulnerable - were framed within the boundaries of a particular people’s relationship with its sacred divine.

What changed in the age of universal religions is not the disappearance of these earlier patterns, but their transformation.

Rather than anchoring salvation, liberation, or righteousness in ancestry or civic membership, universal religions articulate paths - disciplined ways of religiously-living that any person may enter. The sacred is no longer guarded by lineage; it is accessed through practice. What matters is not where one comes from, but how one walks across the life given one.

• Buddhism offers a path of awakening grounded in insight, ethical conduct, and disciplined attention to suffering and impermanence.

• Christianity proclaims a way of life centered on love, self-giving, and participation in the redemptive story of Jesus that transcends ethnic and legal boundaries.

• Islam articulates a comprehensive path of surrender to divine unity, integrating devotion, ethics, and communal responsibility into a coherent way of life.

In each case, the sacred is no longer encountered primarily through ritual allegiance to a local deity, but through transformation of the self per identity with that religion's sacred divine. The divine address turns inward, not as introspective escapism, but as moral and existential summons.

This shift does not abolish community. On the contrary, it creates new forms of community - In India, sangha; in Christianity, ekklesia; in Islam, ummah - each defined not by blood or land, but by shared orientation toward ultimate meaning. These communities are inherently translocal. They can be carried across borders, sustained in exile, and transmitted through teaching rather than inheritance.

The universal religions thus arise at the intersection of two forces: the breakdown of traditional social structures and the expansion of human self-awareness. As the world grows larger and more complex, religion responds by turning inward and outward at once - cultivating interior depth while extending ethical concern beyond familiar boundaries.

In this sense, the age of universal religions does not reject earlier religious forms. It gathers them in, refines them, and releases them into a wider human horizon.

---

II. The Interiorization of the Sacred

One of the most decisive transformations introduced by the universal religions is the relocation of the sacred from external order to interior life. Earlier religious systems had certainly acknowledged inward dispositions - intentions, loyalties, purity of heart - but these were secondary to visible compliance with ritual, law, and social role. The gods were appeased, honored, or obeyed through acts performed in public space and sacred geography.

In the age of universal religions, this orientation reverses. The decisive arena of religious meaning becomes the human interior: intention, awareness, conscience, desire, and surrender. What one is becoming matters as much as, and often more than, what one outwardly performs.

This interiorization is not a withdrawal from the world. Rather, it represents a reconfiguration of how the world is engaged.

Buddhism: Liberation Through Insight and Discipline

In Buddhism, the sacred is not personified as a creator god but encountered through awakened understanding of reality as it is. Suffering (dukkha) is not imposed by divine judgment but arises from craving, attachment, and misperception. Liberation, therefore, does not depend on divine favor or ritual mediation, but on disciplined insight into impermanence, interdependence, and non-self.

The path of liberation - ethics (śīla), meditation (samādhi), and wisdom (prajñā) - is radically interior in its orientation. Yet its ethical implications are unmistakably social. Compassion arises not from command but from clarity: to see reality rightly is to respond to it gently.

Here the sacred becomes a mode of awareness rather than an external authority. Transformation is achieved not by conquest, sacrifice, or appeasement, but by sustained attentiveness to the structures of experience itself.

Christianity: The Moral Interior and the Imitation of Christ

Christianity, emerging from Jewish covenantal tradition, intensifies the inward turn already present in prophetic critique. Jesus’ teachings consistently relocate moral responsibility from external compliance to internal disposition: anger becomes as consequential as violence, desire as weighty as action, love of enemy as central as love of neighbor.

The sacred law is no longer inscribed primarily on stone or scroll, but - echoing prophetic anticipation - upon the heart. Salvation is framed not simply as juridical acquittal, but as transformation of the self through participation in divine love.

Central to this interiorization is the figure of Christ himself. Incarnation (of Christ) locates the divine not in cosmic distance or political power, but in vulnerability, suffering, and relational fidelity. To follow Christ is not merely to assent to doctrine, but to undergo a reshaping of one’s inner orientation toward humility, forgiveness, and self-giving love.

In this way, Christianity universalizes the sacred by locating it within the moral and relational depths of every human life.

Islam: Intention, Submission, and the Ordering of the Self

Islam likewise places decisive emphasis on interior disposition, particularly through the concept of niyyah - intention. Acts of worship, ethical conduct, and communal obligation derive their meaning not solely from outward performance, but from inward orientation toward divine unity (tawḥīd).

Submission (islām) is not passive resignation, but conscious alignment of the self with the moral order of reality as willed by God. The struggle (jihād) most emphasized in classical Islamic spirituality is not external conflict, but the inner struggle against ego, injustice, and forgetfulness.

While Islamic practice is highly structured and communal, its moral force depends upon sincerity of heart and accountability before God beyond any human authority. The sacred thus resides neither in lineage nor priesthood, but in the lived integrity of intention, action, and remembrance.

A Shared Transformation

Across these traditions, the sacred migrates inward without becoming privatized. Interior transformation generates outward consequence. Compassion, justice, hospitality, restraint, and care for the vulnerable are no longer merely civic virtues or divine mandates; they become expressions of an interior alignment with ultimate reality.

This interiorization allows the sacred to travel - to survive exile, persecution, and displacement. A temple may fall. A city may burn. A kingdom may dissolve. But a disciplined heart, an awakened awareness, or a surrendered will can be carried anywhere.

In this sense, universal religions answered a new historical condition: a world in motion. As humanity becomes more mobile, plural, and self-reflective, religion adapts by locating its deepest authority not in place or power, but in the transformation of persons.

Yet this very strength also carries a latent tension. When inner transformation becomes the center of religious life, questions inevitably arise: Who defines authentic transformation? How is it taught, guarded, or enforced? And what happens when interior faith becomes aligned with institutional power?

These questions lead directly to the next development in the universal religious imagination: the emergence of compassion as a trans-cultural sacred law - one that binds inward transformation to outward responsibility.

---

III. Compassion as a Trans-Cultural Sacred Law

As the sacred moved inward, it did not dissolve into private spirituality. On the contrary, interior transformation generated a new and expansive ethical horizon. Across the universal religions, a striking convergence emerges: compassion becomes the decisive moral criterion by which spiritual authenticity is measured.

This convergence does not arise from shared doctrine or metaphysical agreement. Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam differ profoundly in their cosmologies, theological claims, and ritual expressions. Yet each arrives, through its own path, at the insight that genuine encounter with ultimate reality must manifest as care for others - especially the vulnerable, the suffering, and the marginalized.

In earlier religious systems, ethical obligations were largely circumscribed by kinship, city, or covenant. Justice applied primarily within the boundaries of the sacred community. And yet, arising universal religions expanded this moral field. Ethical responsibility now extends beyond tribe and nation, grounded in the shared condition of humanity itself.

Compassion Without Uniformity

In Buddhism, compassion (karuṇā) arises from insight into interdependence. When the illusion of isolated selfhood dissolves, the suffering of others is no longer experienced as foreign. Ethical response becomes an expression of clarity rather than obedience.

In Christianity, love (agapē) is not merely a virtue but a participation in divine life itself. God is encountered not through power or dominance, but through self-giving love - most radically expressed in forgiveness, solidarity with the oppressed, and willingness to suffer for the sake of others. The neighbor is no longer defined by proximity or kinship, but by need.

In Islam, mercy (raḥma) stands at the center of divine identity. Nearly every chapter of the Qur’an begins with the invocation of God as “the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate.” Ethical life flows from remembrance of this mercy and from the responsibility to reflect it in acts of justice, generosity, and restraint.

These ethical visions are not identical, nor do they require philosophical reconciliation. What unites them is not metaphysical agreement but moral direction. Compassion becomes the shared orientation through which the sacred enters the social world.

Ethics Before Ontology

One of the most significant implications of this convergence is that ethics begins to precede ontology. One need not resolve ultimate metaphysical questions in order to act rightly, compassionately, lovingly, mercifully. The demand for compassion does not wait upon perfect doctrine.

This inversion marks a quiet but profound shift in religious consciousness. Rather than grounding ethics in cosmic hierarchy or divine fiat alone, universal religions increasingly ground moral responsibility in relational awareness - awareness of suffering, dependence, vulnerability, and shared fate.

Here the sacred is no longer validated primarily by metaphysical coherence or ritual precision, but by its fruits in lived relation. A faith that fails to generate compassion is exposed as hollow, regardless of its claims to authority or to its orthodoxy.

This ethical primacy will later become a point of tension as religious institutions seek to preserve doctrinal boundaries and social control. But at its core, the universal religious impulse insists that the sacred must make the world more humane or it loses its claim upon religious conscientiousness.

Toward a Universal Moral Horizon

Compassion thus functions as a kind of trans-cultural sacred law - not codified in a single text, not enforced by a single authority, but recognized across traditions as the unmistakable sign of spiritual depth. It offers a moral grammar capable of crossing linguistic, cultural, and theological boundaries without erasing difference.

In this sense, the universal religions do not merely expand belief; they expand responsibility. They invite humanity to imagine itself as morally bound to strangers, enemies, and future generations. The sacred becomes not only something to revere, but something to enact.

Yet this very universality carries risk. When compassion becomes institutionalized, translated into law, doctrine, and empire, it can be distorted into coercion. When love is mandated, it may become enforced. When mercy is claimed as exclusive possession, it can be withheld from those deemed outside the fold.

To understand how the universal religions both liberated and constrained the human spirit, we must now turn to the structures through which the sacred was embodied and transmitted - mysticism, incarnation, and surrender - and to the paradoxes they introduced into the history of faith.

---

IV. Mysticism, Incarnation, and Surrender

The Universal Triad of Religious Experience

As universal religions took shape, they developed not only ethical frameworks and communal identities, but enduring symbolic patterns through which finite human beings sought encounter with the infinite. Across diverse traditions and cultures, three modes of religious experience repeatedly emerge: mystical union, incarnational presence, and surrendered alignment. These are not doctrines imposed from above, but lived responses to the same existential tension—the longing to bridge the distance between human finitude and ultimate reality.

Though expressed differently in each tradition, these three modes function together as a universal triad through which the sacred becomes experientially accessible.

Mysticism: Direct Encounter Beyond Mediation

Mysticism names the human intuition that ultimate reality can be encountered directly, beyond symbol, language, or institutional mediation. In mystical experience, the boundary between self and world softens; the sacred is not observed from a distance but participated in.

In Buddhism, this encounter takes the form of awakening to emptiness (śūnyatā) and interdependence, dissolving the illusion of a separate, enduring self. In Christian mysticism, it appears as union with God through love, silence, and contemplative surrender—often described as intimacy rather than comprehension. In Islam, particularly within Sufism, mysticism emerges as annihilation of the ego (fanāʾ) in the presence of divine unity.

Mysticism thus functions as a corrective to over-institutionalization. It insists that the sacred cannot be fully captured by doctrine or authority. It reminds religious communities that symbols point beyond themselves, and that the deepest knowledge of reality is transformative rather than propositional.

Yet mysticism alone is unstable. Detached from history and embodiment, it risks becoming esoteric or socially disengaged. The universal religions therefore pair mystical immediacy with a second movement: incarnation.

Incarnation: The Sacred Within History

Incarnation names the conviction that the sacred does not remain abstract or distant, but enters the textures of historical life. In Christianity, this conviction is explicit and central: divinity is revealed not in imperial power or cosmic spectacle, but in a particular human life marked by vulnerability, compassion, and suffering.

Yet incarnational logic extends beyond Christianity alone. Buddhism locates awakening within embodied practice and ethical discipline, rejecting salvation through metaphysical speculation alone. Islam affirms divine transcendence while insisting that God’s will is made known through concrete guidance shaping daily life, community, and law.

In each case, the sacred becomes accessible not by escaping the world, but by engaging it rightly. History, body, and relationship become sites of encounter rather than obstacles to transcendence.

Incarnation grounds mysticism, anchoring spiritual experience in ethical responsibility and communal memory. It resists spiritual elitism by insisting that the sacred is present within ordinary human struggle.

Surrender: The Relinquishment of Egoic Control

The third movement of the triad—surrender—addresses the existential obstacle that underlies all spiritual seeking: the human impulse to control, possess, and secure reality according to one’s own will.

In Buddhism, surrender takes the form of relinquishing attachment and craving. In Christianity, it appears as self-denial, trust, and willingness to lose one’s life in order to find it. In Islam, surrender is named directly as the heart of faith: aligning one’s will with divine unity.

Surrender is not passivity. It is a disciplined openness to transformation—a refusal to absolutize the ego as the measure of meaning. Through surrender, the sacred is no longer encountered as a rival power but as a relational horizon within which the self is reshaped.

A Shared Grammar of Transcendence

Together, mysticism, incarnation, and surrender form a shared grammar through which universal religions articulate the encounter between humanity and the sacred. Mysticism offers immediacy, incarnation offers embodiment, and surrender offers transformation. None is sufficient alone; each corrects the excesses of the others.

This triad allows the sacred to be both intimate and ethical, transcendent and historical, inward and communal. It explains how religions with radically different theologies can nonetheless generate similar spiritual fruits—and similar tensions.

For while these modes of encounter deepen religious life, they also invite institutional response. Mysticism must be regulated, incarnation interpreted, surrender directed. Over time, structures emerge to guard, transmit, and enforce these experiences, giving rise to religious authority, orthodoxy, and empire.

It is to this paradox—how religions of inner liberation became engines of social control—that we must now turn.

---

V. The Paradox of Universality: Liberation and Control

The very qualities that enabled the universal religions to transcend tribe and territory also rendered them capable of unprecedented scale and influence. A faith that could travel could also govern. A message that addressed the inner life could also shape law, culture, and empire. In this way, religions born from compassion, surrender, and interior transformation gradually became entangled with structures of authority and control.

This development was neither accidental nor purely corruptive. As universal religions spread across vast and diverse populations, they required mechanisms of transmission, interpretation, and cohesion. Teachings had to be preserved. Practices had to be standardized. Communities had to be organized. What began as paths of transformation became traditions, then institutions.

Scripture was canonized. Doctrine was formalized. Orthodoxy emerged to guard against fragmentation. These processes stabilized religious identity and allowed faith to endure across generations. Without them, the universal religions might have remained ephemeral movements, dissolving under the pressures of cultural diversity and political change.

Yet institutionalization carried a cost.

When the sacred is administered, it can be regulated. When compassion is codified, it can be enforced. When surrender is interpreted by authority, it can be demanded rather than freely offered. The inward turn that once liberated conscience now risked submission to external control.

Religion and Empire

Nowhere is this paradox more visible than in the alliance between universal religions and empire. Buddhism found patronage under imperial rulers. Christianity moved from persecuted minority to state religion of Rome. Islam emerged as both a spiritual and political community, rapidly expanding across continents.

Empires provided protection, infrastructure, and legitimacy. Religions provided moral vision, social cohesion, and cosmic justification. The exchange was mutually reinforcing—and morally ambiguous.

Universal compassion now coexisted with exclusion. Love of neighbor was bounded by orthodoxy. Mercy was extended selectively. Violence could be sacralized in the name of order, purity, or divine will.

This was not a betrayal of religion by politics alone. It reflected an unresolved tension within the universal religious imagination itself: how to preserve moral universality without dissolving into chaos; how to maintain coherence without suppressing conscience.

The Ambivalence of Authority

Religious authority arises in response to genuine need—the need for continuity, shared meaning, and communal discernment. Yet authority, once established, tends toward self-preservation. Over time, the language of transformation can harden into the language of control.

Mystics are tolerated, then regulated. Reformers are honored, then domesticated. Radical compassion is praised, then constrained by doctrine and law.

The universal religions thus generate their own critique from within. Prophetic voices re-emerge to call institutions back to their founding vision. Reform movements arise to restore interior depth and ethical integrity. These cycles of renewal and resistance repeat across centuries.

A Threshold, Not a Terminus

The age of universal religions represents a decisive expansion of human moral imagination. It universalized ethical concern, interiorized the sacred, and articulated pathways of transformation capable of crossing cultural boundaries. But it did not resolve the fundamental tension between freedom and order, experience and authority, compassion and control.

Rather than a final stage in religious evolution, the universal religions mark a threshold. They prepare humanity for a deeper reckoning—one in which inherited cosmologies, institutional certainties, and metaphysical guarantees would be challenged by new ways of knowing the world.

The next epoch will not abandon the sacred. It will question its forms.

As reason, science, and historical consciousness rise to prominence, the sacred will appear to recede—not because it has vanished, but because the structures that once mediated it can no longer command unquestioned trust. The eclipse that follows will be unsettling, disorienting, and creative.

It is to that eclipse—and to the modern struggle to reimagine meaning in a disenchanted cosmos—that the next essay turns.

---

Conclusion

The age of universal religions transformed the sacred from local allegiance to global horizon, from inherited identity to chosen path, from external authority to interior transformation. In doing so, it expanded humanity’s capacity for compassion, responsibility, and self-reflection.

Yet by aligning with empire and institution, these traditions also exposed the fragility of universality itself. The sacred, once made universal, risked becoming uniform; once liberating, it risked becoming coercive.

This unresolved tension does not invalidate the universal religions. It reveals their historical task—and their limitation. They carried humanity to the edge of a wider horizon. Beyond that edge lies modernity, with its rebellions, its disenchantments, and its longing to rediscover meaning without surrendering freedom.

Essay 10 will explore that passage.

---

~ Continue to Part IV, Essay 10 ~

Evolution of Worship & Religion

• Introduction
• Maps, Tables & Data
• A Proposed Outline
• Resources

• Part I - Foundations: The Birth of the Sacred
• Essay 1 - Animism and the Living Cosmos
• Essay 2 - From Tribe to Totem

• Part II - The Age of Gods
• Essay 3 - The Mesopotamian Fertile Crescent
• Essay 4 - Egypt, Indus, and Minoa Sacred Cultures
• Essay 5 - From Polytheism to Henotheism

• Part III - Axial Awakenings
• Essay 6 - Ancient Israel, Persia, and Monotheism
• Essay 7 - India's Axial Age
• Essay 8 - Greece and the Birth of Reason

• Part IV - The Sacred Made Universal
• Essay 9 - The Age of Universal Religions
• Essay 10 - Modernity and the Eclipse of the Sacred
• Essay 11 - The Rebirth of the Sacred
• Essay 12 - A Processual Summation of Worship and Religion
• Essay 13 - The Way of Cruciformity: When God Refused Power

• Part V - Supplementary Materials
• I - The Ancient History of Mesopotamia
• II - The History of Language in Ancient Mesopotamia
• III - The Ancient History of the Hebrew Language
• IV(A-C) How the Ancient Near East Gave Shape to Israel's God
• Why the ANE is Essential for Israel's Received Theology (I-II)
• Affecting Cultic Syncretism Across the Ancient Near East (III-V)
• Cultural Identity Formation & the Rejection of Syncretism (VI-IX)
• V (A-C) The History & Compilation of the Hebrew Bible
• From Oral Memory to Proto-Canon (I-II)
• Exile, Redaction, and the Birth of Scripture (III)
• Second Temple Scribalization to Canonization (IV-V)
• VI - The Unhelpful Oxymorons of "Biblical Authority" & "Inerrancy"
• VII - The Evolution of Inerrancy: From Ancient Plurality to Modern Certainty
• VIII - A Historical-Theological Study of "Son of Man" vs "Son of God"
• IX - The Song of Gilgamesh & Other Ancient Flood Stories

---

BIBLIOGRAPHY

---

I. Comparative Religion & Axial Age Foundations

• Bellah, Robert N. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age. Harvard University Press, 2011.

• Jaspers, Karl. The Origin and Goal of History. Yale University Press, 1953.

• Armstrong, Karen. The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions. Knopf, 2006.

• Smart, Ninian. The World’s Religions. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

• Smith, Huston. The World’s Religions. HarperOne, 1991.

---

II. Buddhism: Interior Liberation, Compassion, and Awakening

• Rahula, Walpola. What the Buddha Taught. Grove Press, 1959.

• Gethin, Rupert. The Foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press, 1998.

• Harvey, Peter. An Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and Practices. Cambridge University Press, 2013.

• Batchelor, Stephen. Buddhism Without Beliefs. Riverhead Books, 1997.

• Keown, Damien. Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2005.

---

III. Christianity: Interiorization, Incarnation, and Universal Ethics

• Dunn, James D. G. Jesus Remembered. Eerdmans, 2003.

• Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God. Fortress Press, 1992.

• Pagels, Elaine. The Gnostic Gospels. Vintage, 1989.

• Borg, Marcus J. Jesus: Uncovering the Life, Teachings, and Relevance of a Religious Revolutionary. HarperOne, 2006.

• Brown, Raymond E. An Introduction to the New Testament. Yale University Press, 1997.

---

IV. Islam: Submission, Mercy, and Ethical Universality

• Esposito, John L. Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press, 2016.

• Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Ideals and Realities of Islam. HarperOne, 2000.

• Rahman, Fazlur. Islam. University of Chicago Press, 1979.

• Chittick, William C. Sufism: A Short Introduction. Oneworld Publications, 2000.

• Ahmed, Shahab. What Is Islam? The Importance of Being Islamic. Princeton University Press, 2016.

---

V. Mysticism, Incarnation, and Surrender (Cross-Tradition)

• Underhill, Evelyn. Mysticism. Oxford University Press, 1911.

• James, William. The Varieties of Religious Experience. Longmans, Green & Co., 1902.

• Katz, Steven T. (ed.). Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis. Oxford University Press, 1978.

• McGinn, Bernard. The Foundations of Mysticism. Crossroad Publishing, 1991.

• Panikkar, Raimon. The Intrareligious Dialogue. Paulist Press, 1978.

---

VI. Compassion, Ethics, and Moral Universality

• Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity. Duquesne University Press, 1969.

• Hauerwas, Stanley. A Community of Character. University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

• Küng, Hans. Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic. Crossroad, 1991.

• Singer, Peter. The Expanding Circle. Princeton University Press, 1981.

• Nussbaum, Martha. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, 2001.

---

VII. Religion, Empire, and Institutional Power

• Weber, Max. The Sociology of Religion. Beacon Press, 1963.

• Brown, Peter. The Rise of Western Christendom. Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

• Assmann, Jan. The Price of Monotheism. Stanford University Press, 2010.

• Juergensmeyer, Mark. The New Cold War? Religious Nationalism Confronts the Secular State. University of California Press, 1993.

• Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. Pantheon Books, 1980.

---

VIII. Proto-Process and Evolutionary Religion (Bridge Forward)

• Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion in the Making. Fordham University Press, 1926.

• Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. Free Press, 1978.

• Cobb, John B., Jr. & Griffin, David Ray. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition. Westminster Press, 1976.

• Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre. The Phenomenon of Man. Harper & Row, 1959.

• Bellah, Robert N. “Religious Evolution.” American Sociological Review 29, no. 3 (1964).

Evolution of Worship & Religion: Part III - Axial Awakenings: Greece (8)

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

The Evolution of Worship and Religion:

From Cosmic Awe to Processual Faith

A Metamodern Journey through the History of the Sacred

THE AGE OF GODS

PART III - ESSAY 8

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

In the beginning, there was wonder.

And wonder is where worship began.

---

PART III

AXIAL AWAKENINGS:

Ethics, Reflection, and Inner Faith

The Iron Age II to the Persian Period

1,000-300 BCE

Essay 6 - The Prophetic Revolutions: Israel, Persia, and Ethical Monotheism

• From covenant to conscience: Yahweh, Ahura Mazda, and the moral cosmos.
• The prophetic imagination as ethical evolution.
• Ritual gives way to righteousness; the divine becomes relational.
• The first stirrings of universality within monotheism.

The Late Iron Age II to the Second Urbanization

900-200 BCE

Essay 7 - India and the Path of Liberation

• From ritual sacrifice to spiritual introspection.
• The Upanishads’ discovery of Atman-Brahman unity.
• Karma and dharma as moral order embedded in cosmic process.
• Contemplation replaces appeasement — liberation as alignment.

The Greek Archaic Age to the Classical Iron Age

750-200 BCE

Essay 8 - Greece and the Birth of Reasoned Faith

• Philosophy as the rationalization of myth.
• From Homer’s gods to Plato’s One and Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover.
• The sacred reframed as order, harmony, and purpose.
• Stoicism’s divine logos as precursor to process thought.

---

Essay 8

Greece and the Birth of Reasoned Faith 

Before Greece reasoned, it sang;

and with song rose dramatic myths.

Its stories of the gods asked questions,

questions which needed answers.

Greece asked what the stories meant,

and from those stories philosophy was born.

Where poets saw divine conflict,

philosophers sought cosmic harmony.

Reason gathered the scattered world

together in debated, intelligible wholes.

In the rising vision of Logos, cosmic order

became the new language of the sacred.

R.E. Slater

December 28, 2025

---

Preface - From Song to Reason, From Myth to Meaning

Before Greece reasoned, it sang. The earliest Greek religious imagination did not arise in treatises or arguments but in the resonant cadences of epic poetry - Homer’s wandering bards (c 8th century BCE) and Hesiod’s (c.750-650 BCE) genealogies of the gods in his Theogony (730-700 BCE). These oral traditions carried more than entertainment: they preserved a worldview. Through their songs, dramatic myths emerged, forming a symbolic universe in which the origins of justice, fate, human suffering, and cosmic order could be explored. Greek myth was never merely story; it was a cultural meditation on the meaning of the world.

Yet the myths themselves posed questions - questions that stirred curiosity and demanded interpretation. What lay beneath the divine conflicts of Olympus? What principle held the cosmos together? Why did fates bind even the gods? As the Greeks pondered these puzzles, they began to ask what the stories meant. From this act of questioning, philosophy was born.

The transition was not a rejection of myth but a reflection upon it. The Pre-Socratics reimagined mythic themes in rational form: Thales (c. 626/623 - 548/545 BCE) sought the substrate of all things, Anaximander (c. 610 - 546 BCE) probed the origins of order, Heraclitus (c. 500 BCE) interpreted cosmic tension as harmony. Plato (c. 428-423 - 348/347 BCE) dialogued constantly with the myths he inherited, reworking them as philosophical allegories. Aristotle (c. 384 - 322 BCE) systematized what myth had once expressed symbolically, turning divine genealogy into metaphysics. This was both the birth and age of Greece's Philosophical Period.

Where the poets saw divine conflict, philosophers sought cosmic harmony. They replaced anthropomorphic drama with inquiries into order, purpose, and intelligibility. The world, once narrated through folkloric stories and superstitions became something to be understood - an intelligible whole capable of being debated, refined, and grasped through reason. Thus Greek philosophy emerged as a new sacred canopy: diverse, argumentative, pluralistic, and relentlessly in search of unity.

In this intellectual environment, Logos began to take on the explanatory role once held by the gods. For Heraclitus, it was the hidden principle guiding all flux; for the Stoics, it became the divine rationality pervading nature itself. Greek religion did not vanish - ritual, cult, and myth continued to thrive - but within the philosophical schools, a new metaphysical devotion arose. The Sacred was reframed as cosmic order, rational structure, and universal harmony.

This Preface introduces the transformation at the heart of Greece’s Axial Age contribution: the birth of reasoned faith, where myth provokes thought, thought seeks unity, and the search for wisdom becomes a form of sacred inquiry.

---

Dates, Times, and Characteristics of

the Ages between 1000-200 BCE

Essay 6 - Israel & Persia:

Historical Period: Iron Age II: Israel → Persian Period

Timeframe: c. 1000–300 BCE

Iron Age II (c. 1000–586 BCE) - Israel's early monarchy and classical prophets

Iron Age III / Neo-Babylonian Period (c. 600–539 BCE) - Israel's Second Exile

Achaemenid Persian Period (539–330 BCE) - Israel's restoration back to Canaan, the development of early Monotheism, and early Apocalypticism (Second Temple theology)

Early Hellenistic Period begins 330 BCE but is outside the core of Essay 6

Persian / Zoroastrian Timeline

Zoroaster (Zarathustra) - traditionally dated 1200–1000 BCE,

but modern scholarship places him around 600–500 BCE

Achaemenid Empire (550–330 BCE)

Cyrus the Great

Darius I

Persian tolerance & influence on Judaism

Key characteristics of this period

Iron tools, weapons, agriculture

Rise of large territorial empires

Literacy and script canonization

Ethical monotheism emerges

Israelite prophetic ethics

Exilic transformation

Persian dualism and moral universe

Birth of ethical monotheism

Judaism’s late Second Temple adoption of resurrection, angels, eschatology

Zoroastrian moral dualism and cosmic ethics

Essay 7 - India (Upanishads, Buddhism, Jainism):

Historical Period: Late Iron Age → Second Urbanization

Timeframe: c. 900–200 BCE

Later Vedic Period (Iron Age India)
Early Upanishadic Period (c. 800–500 BCE)

Brahman/Atman unity arises

Turn inward toward metaphysical interiority

Middle Upanishadic/Second Urbanization (c. 600–400 BCE)

Buddha & Mahāvīra (Janism) (6th–5th century BCE)

Siddhārtha Gautama (the Buddha) - 563–483 BCE

Mahāvīra (Jainism) - c. 599–527 BCE

Late Upanishads - after 300 BCE

Key characteristics of this period

Use of iron ploughs enabling rice-agricultural expansion

Rise of cities and trade routes

Ritual questioning → metaphysical interiority

Karma/dharma systems become moral frameworks

Renouncer movements challenge priestly rituals

Transition from Vedic ritualism → Upanishadic introspection

Karma/dharma as moral process

Liberation (moksha) as alignment with cosmic reality

Rise of renouncer traditions

Buddha’s non-theistic moral clarity

Essay 8 - Greece (Archaic → Classical → Hellenistic Periods):
Historical Period: Greek Archaic & Classical Iron Age

Timeframe: c. 750–200 BCE

Greek Iron Age → Archaic Period (800–500 BCE)

Homeric epics (750 BCE) - narrates the Greek Pantheon

PreSocratic Inquiry

Thales, Anaximander, Heraclitus (600–500 BCE)

Shift from mythic gods → rational principles

Greek philosophy emerges during the Iron Age’s Archaic and Classical phases.

Classical Philosophy Period (500–323 BCE)

Socrates (470–399 BCE)

Plato (428–348 BCE)

Aristotle (384–322 BCE)

Hellenistic Period (323–200 BCE)

Stoics (300–100 BCE)

Logos as a cosmic rational fire

Deep resonance with process metaphysics

Key characteristics of the period

Iron weaponry (hoplite revolution)
City-states and democratic experiments
Emergence of philosophy (Thales → Aristotle)
Rationalization of myth
Logos, metaphysics, cosmic harmony
Greek rationalization of myth
Philosophical conceptions of the divine
Emergence of metaphysics as theology
Logos, nous, harmony, teleology
Proto-processual ideas

---

Introduction - The Greek Axial Horizon and Birth of Inquiry

Greece’s Axial transformation unfolded between roughly 750 and 200 BCE, a period that witnessed the remarkable convergence of poetic imagination, rational speculation, civic experimentation, and metaphysical inquiry:

Unlike the Near East, where ethical monotheism reoriented the moral cosmos, or India, where interior liberation reshaped spiritual aspiration, the Greek breakthrough emerged as a search for intelligibility: a conviction that the world, in all its beauty and turmoil, could be grasped by the human mind.

This intellectual movement did not begin with philosophy. It began with myth. The earliest Greeks explained the world through epic stories, genealogies of the gods, tragic conflicts, and heroic sagas. Homer and Hesiod provided not only narrative entertainment but a symbolic map of meaning. Their poems gave voice to the ethical, cosmic, and psychological questions that philosophers would later crystallize into argument. The myths raised the questions; philosophy sharpened them.

By the time of the early city-states, Greek thinkers had begun to treat nature as kosmos - an ordered, intelligible whole - rather than as the stage for divine quarrels. The Pre-Socratics searched for the underlying unity that made the world coherent: water, air, numbers, flux, boundlessness. Their debates formed the first great laboratory of rational inquiry, where arguments could be challenged, refined, or overturned. Thought became public, contested, and cumulative.

In this shift, Greece contributed something unprecedented to world religion and philosophy: the conviction that reason itself could serve as a path to the sacred. The pursuit of wisdom became a form of devotion. The recognition of order, harmony, and proportion became a way of both discovering and honoring reality. From this grew the metaphysical systems of Plato and Aristotle, each offering a vision in which the ultimate is not mythic personality but intelligible structure: the Good, the One, Being, the Unmoved Mover.

Later, the Hellenistic schools extended this transformation. The Stoics (founded by Zeno around 300 BCE and thence forward into the Roman empire, the Renaissance, and world religions such as Christianity) identified the divine with the Logos that permeates all nature. *Epicureans (founded in 307 BCE) reinterpreted the gods as distant and non-interfering, redirecting devotion toward the cultivation of tranquility. Even skeptics participated in this development, insisting that wisdom begins in humility about what can be known.

*Epicureanism is a system of philosophy founded in 307 BCE and based upon the teachings of Epicurus, an ancient Greek philosopher. Epicurus was an atomist and materialist, following in the steps of Democritus. His materialism led him to religious skepticism and a general attack on superstition and divine intervention. Epicureanism was originally a challenge to Platonism, and its main opponent later became Stoicism. It is a form of hedonism insofar as it declares pleasure to be its sole intrinsic goal. However, the concept that the absence of pain and fear constitutes the greatest pleasure, and its advocacy of a simple life, make it very different from hedonism as colloquially understood. - Wikipedia

Thus the Greek Axial Age forged a new foundation for the sacred: not mythic drama, not ritual performance, not priestly authority, but the rational contemplation of the world. Philosophy became a spiritual quest, the cosmos a text to be interpreted, and reason a means of aligning oneself with the deeper order of reality.

This essay explores that transformation. It traces the movement from epic myth to philosophical inquiry, from Homer’s gods to Plato’s transcendent Forms, from natural speculation to ethical and metaphysical systems, and finally to the Stoic vision of a rational cosmos infused with divine purpose. In doing so, it illuminates Greece’s unique contribution to the Axial Age: the discovery that thinking itself could be a form of faith.

---

I. From Myth to Inquiry - The Poetic Foundations of Greek Thought

Before Greece became the birthplace of Western philosophy, it was a culture of song, epic memory, and mythic imagination. The earliest attempts to explain the world were entrusted not to philosophers or scientists but to poets whose task was to preserve and interpret the symbolic universe inherited from the Bronze Age. Through their stories, the Greeks developed a conceptual vocabulary for fate, justice, conflict, and cosmic order - themes that would later become central to philosophical inquiry.

It was within this narrative world that the first seeds of rational reflection were planted. Greek myth did not stifle philosophical thought; it invited it. It articulated the questions that philosophy would later pursue with sharper tools. The Pre-Socratics did not demolish myth so much as offer new answers to its enduring questions.

---

A. Homer, Hesiod, and the World Shaped by Story

The earliest sources of Greek cosmology and ethics are the poems of Homer and Hesiod, whose works formed the cultural encyclopedia of Archaic Greece. The Iliad (composed around the late 8th or early 7th century BCE)  and Odyssey (composed around the same time or later by the mid-6th century BCE) presented a world in which human destiny unfolds under the shifting intentions of divine beings. The gods were anthropomorphic, capricious, powerful, and deeply involved in human affairs. Yet their presence raised profound questions: What governs fate? What is justice among gods and mortals? What does it mean to act nobly in a fragile and unpredictable world?

Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days (a didactic poem similar to a farmer's almanac) offered complementary visions. The Theogony traced the genealogy of the gods and the ordering of the cosmos, providing a mythic map of divine hierarchy and cosmic emergence. Works and Days presented a moralized interpretation of human labor, justice, and suffering. Hesiod’s gods were not only powerful but pedagogical, embodying principles of order, strife, balance, and necessity.

These poetic texts sketched a symbolic universe filled with meaning. They did not claim to offer logical arguments or metaphysical proofs, yet they framed the fundamental questions of existence: What is the origin of the world? What is the good life? What forces shape human fate?

---

B. Myth as Proto-Philosophical Inquiry

The myths of Archaic Greece were more than stories. They served as early models for understanding human psychology, social ethics, and the structure of reality. They functioned as proto-philosophical reflections in symbolic form.

Several features of Greek myth made it fertile ground for the emergence of rational inquiry:

• Narrative structure encouraged causal thinking about actions and consequences.

• Divine conflict suggested underlying tensions in nature, ethics, and cosmic order.

• Genealogies of gods provided frameworks for thinking about origins and hierarchy.

• Moral narratives contained implicit theories of justice, virtue, and responsibility.

As the Greek world became increasingly literate and politically complex, these inherited stories began to invite reflection. Thinkers sought underlying principles that explained not only mythic events but natural processes, human behavior, and cosmic order.

The transition from mythos to logos did not erase the former; it emerged from deep engagement with it. Philosophical inquiry was born from the attempt to interpret, refine, and sometimes challenge the symbolic meanings already embedded in mythic tradition.

---

C. The Shift Toward Naturalistic Explanation

By the late Archaic period (c. 800 - 480 BCE) a significant transformation occurred. A new class of thinkers - later called the Pre-Socratics - began to ask what the world was made of, how it originated, and what principles governed its behavior. These questions represented a shift from narrative explanation to naturalistic reasoning.

Thales argued that water was the underlying substance of all things. Anaximander proposed the apeiron, the boundless, as the source of cosmic order. Heraclitus identified flux and the unity of opposites as the principles that structure reality. Parmenides claimed that ultimate reality is unchanging Being, challenging the entire Greek mythic worldview of processual becoming.

Though their answers differed radically, their shared method marked something new: a commitment to explaining the world through reason, observation, and argument rather than divine storytelling.

The cosmos, once populated with gods, became an intelligible whole governed by principles accessible to human understanding.

---

D. Philosophical Interpretation Without Religious Erasure

Despite these innovations, mythic religion did not disappear. Civic cults, rituals, festivals, and temple practices remained integral to Greek social life throughout the Classical (the 5th and 4th centuries BCE) and Hellenistic periods (c. 323 to 30 BCE: from Alexander the Great to Cleopatra VII's death; where Greek, Eastern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern regions were under the influence of Classical Greek thought). What changed was not the external structure of religious practice but the internal logic of explanation.

Philosophers offered interpretations rather than rejections:

• Xenophanes rejected anthropomorphic gods, proposing a singular divine intelligence.

• Plato reinterpreted myths as allegories pointing to eternal truths.

• The tragic poets (key figures: Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides; figures of note: Phrynichus, Agathon, Philocles)) continued to explore divine themes even as philosophical schools developed new metaphysical frameworks.

• Aeschylus (c. 525–456 BC): The earliest of the three major tragedians.

• Sophocles (c. 497–406 BC): Known for plays like Oedipus and Antigone, adding the third actor.

• Euripides (c. 480–406 BC): Explored themes of human nature, with more plays surviving than his contemporaries.

• Phrynichus (early 5th century BC): An early tragedian, pupil of Thespis, considered a founder of tragedy.

• Agathon (c. 448–400 BC): An Athenian tragic poet featured in Plato's Symposium.

• Philocles (4th Century BCE): A member of Aeschylus's family dynasty, also a tragic poet. 

The movement from myth to inquiry was thus additive rather than destructive. Philosophy did not destroy the religious imagination; it transfigured it, offering new ways of understanding the sacred, the cosmic, and the ethical dimensions of human life. And, as interjection, what one could say about the role of philosophy in general in juxtaposition to religion and theology.

---

Section I Summary

Greek thought evolved not by breaking with myth but by interrogating and illuminating it. Epic poetry provided the symbolic vocabulary for understanding fate, justice, and cosmic order. As thinkers reflected on these themes, they shifted from narrative explanations to rational inquiry, laying the foundation for the Presocratic search for unity, principle, and intelligibility. In the Greek Axial transformation, myth became the seedbed of philosophy.

---

The Theatre of Miletus, Didim

II. The Pre-Socratics and the First Philosophical Cosmos

The emergence of the Pre-Socratics represents one of the most profound intellectual shifts in human history. For the first time, thinkers attempted to describe the world not through divine personalities or mythic narratives but through principles, elements, and rational structures. They sought the underlying unity in the multiplicity of appearances and attempted to articulate the rational order that made reality coherent. In this shift from mythos to logos, they laid the foundations of Western philosophy and inaugurated a new way of conceiving the sacred: not as the activity of gods, but as the intelligible order of the cosmos itself.

The Pre-Socratics did not operate as a unified school. They differed widely in their explanations, methods, and ambitions. Yet together they initiated a shared intellectual project: to understand the world as a kosmos - an ordered whole governed by discoverable principles. Their work marks the birth of rational metaphysics and the beginning of an enduring conversation about the nature of being, change, unity, and multiplicity.

---

A. The Milesians and the Search for a Primordial Substance

The first systematic philosophical inquiries emerged in Miletus, a wealthy Ionian city with extensive exposure to Egyptian, Near Eastern, and Anatolian cultures. The Milesian philosophers sought to identify the Arche - the primordial substance or principle from which all things originated.

Thales proposed water as the underlying element, arguing that it is essential for life and can transform into different states. Anaximander advanced beyond material identification by positing the apeiron, the boundless or indefinite, as the source of cosmic generation. Anaximenes returned to a more concrete principle, identifying air as the arche and explaining change through processes of rarefaction and condensation.

These thinkers transformed cosmology into a rational inquiry. The world, in their view, could be explained not by divine genealogy but by natural processes accessible to observation and thought.

---

B. Heraclitus - Flux, Tension, and the Hidden Order

Heraclitus of Ephesus introduced a radically new vision of reality. He argued that the world is characterized by constant flux - that everything is in motion and nothing remains the same. Yet beneath this change lies a deeper unity of opposites: harmony arises through tension, just as the taut string produces the musical note.

Heraclitus introduced the concept of Logos as the rational structure of the cosmos. For him, Logos was not a personal deity but the underlying order that permeates all things. It is the principle that unites change with continuity, conflict with harmony. His vision of reality as relational, dynamic, and structured anticipates later developments in Stoicism and even resonates, in distant ways, with modern process thought.

---

C. Parmenides and the Revelation of Being

If Heraclitus emphasized change, Parmenides championed being. In a dramatic philosophical reversal, he argued that change is an illusion and that true reality is a single, ungenerated, unchanging unity. His poem presents a rational vision in which thought can grasp only what is; non-being is unthinkable, and therefore change, multiplicity, and becoming cannot genuinely exist.

Parmenides forced Greek philosophy into a methodological crisis. If change is impossible, how can the world we experience be explained? His argument compelled later thinkers, including Plato and Aristotle, to reconcile the tension between appearing and being.

Parmenides is the first philosopher to articulate a full metaphysical system grounded in logical necessity. He shifted the philosophical project from cosmological speculation to the rigorous examination of what it means to exist.

---

D. Post-Parmenidean Responses - Pluralism, Atomism, and the Search for Structure

The philosophical crisis initiated by Parmenides provoked a flurry of new theories seeking to preserve both unity and multiplicity. Empedocles proposed four root substances - earth, air, fire, and water - governed by the cosmic forces of Love and Strife. Anaxagoras introduced Nous, or Mind, as the organizing principle of an infinitely divisible world. Leucippus and Democritus developed Atomism, positing indivisible particles moving through the void.

These efforts represent the first major attempts to reconcile being with becoming, order with diversity, unity with plurality. In each case, the cosmos is explained by principles that operate consistently and intelligibly. Divine personalities recede; rational structures emerge.

What unites these thinkers is their shared conviction that reality can be understood through intelligible mechanisms rather than mythic storytelling. Their theories, though speculative, laid the groundwork for physics, metaphysics, and natural philosophy.

---

Section II Summary

The Pre-Socratics inaugurated the first philosophical cosmos. They replaced divine narrative with rational structure, sought the underlying principles of nature, and developed competing visions of reality grounded in argument rather than story. Their search for unity within multiplicity became the foundation for the metaphysical systems of Plato and Aristotle and established reason as a legitimate path to understanding the sacred order of the world.

---

III. Plato, Aristotle, and the Architecture of Rational Faith

With the arrival of Plato and Aristotle, Greek thought reached a level of systematic depth unmatched in the ancient world. Where the Pre-Socratics had posed the fundamental questions about unity, change, order, and intelligibility, Plato and Aristotle provided the first enduring architectures of metaphysics. Their systems transformed philosophy into a disciplined search for truth grounded in reason, and in doing so, redefined the sacred as the intelligible structure of reality itself.

In their hands, the cosmos became not merely a natural order but a moral-intellectual order, accessible to human understanding and capable of guiding human flourishing. The divine was no longer found primarily in mythic narrative or ritual performance but in the discovery of rational principles, Forms, purposes, and causes. This transformation marked a fundamental shift in the religious imagination of classical Greece: wisdom became devotion, contemplation became prayer, and the pursuit of knowledge became a path toward alignment with the highest reality.

---

A. Plato - The Realm of Forms and the Ascent of the Soul

Plato’s philosophy emerged as a response to the competing insights of Heraclitus and Parmenides. Heraclitus insisted that everything changes; Parmenides insisted that true reality does not change. Plato resolved this tension by dividing reality into two levels.

1 - The world of becoming is the realm of flux, imperfection, and material multiplicity. It is the domain of appearances, shadows, and sensory experience.

2 - The world of being, by contrast, contains the eternal and unchanging Forms - perfect realities such as the Good, the Beautiful, the Equal, and the Just.

These Forms are the true objects of knowledge, and their intelligibility provides stability amid the shifting landscape of the material world.

Plato’s vision is fundamentally religious in its aspirations:

• The soul, he argues, belongs to the higher realm of Forms and seeks to ascend back toward its origin.

• Philosophy becomes a spiritual discipline: an exercise in turning the soul from shadow to light, from opinion to knowledge, from the transient to the eternal.

In the Republic, the Form of the Good stands at the pinnacle of reality, illuminating all truth and grounding all being. It functions not merely as a metaphysical abstraction but as the ultimate object of devotion and the source of moral orientation.

Plato thus transformed rational inquiry into a path of liberation, one that parallels - yet differs fundamentally from - the liberation traditions emerging in India. For Plato, the sacred is not found in divine personalities but in the luminosity of intelligible order. The soul is liberated through participation in eternal Forms, and knowledge of the Good functions as a form of salvation: an ascent from illusion to truth, from disorder to rational harmony.

By contrast, Indian traditions do not locate liberation primarily in intellectual enlightenment or civic virtue, but in spiritual self-realization - the experiential recognition of Atman’s unity with Brahman. Liberation (moksha) is not achieved by knowing the structure of reality from without, but by realizing one’s deepest identity from within, thereby escaping the cycle of rebirth (samsara). Where Plato seeks release through rational contemplation of eternal truths, Indian thought seeks freedom through transformative insight into the nature of self and ultimate reality.

---

B. Aristotle - Substance, Purpose, and the Unmoved Mover

Where Plato emphasized transcendence, Aristotle emphasized immanence. He rejected the separation between the world of Forms and the world of Experience, arguing instead that the intelligible structure of reality is embedded within the things themselves. Substance, form, matter, potentiality, and actuality became the tools with which he analyzed the natural world.

Aristotle’s most enduring contribution is his teleological vision of nature. All things possess intrinsic purposes or ends toward which they tend. An acorn strives to become an oak; a human strives to flourish through reason and virtue. Purpose is not imposed from without but inscribed in the very structure of being. This teleological worldview provides the foundation for Aristotle’s ethics, politics, biology, and metaphysics.

At the pinnacle of Aristotle’s system stands the Unmoved Mover, the ultimate cause of all motion and the highest actuality. Unlike the gods of myth, the Unmoved Mover does not intervene in the world; it functions as the final cause, drawing all things toward fulfillment. It is pure actuality, perfect intelligibility, and the object of the highest contemplation. For Aristotle, the life of the divine is the life of the mind thinking itself, and the human vocation is to participate, even partially, in this contemplative activity.

Aristotle thus offers a vision in which the sacred is identified with the highest form of rational perfection. Cosmic order, not divine personality, becomes the ultimate ground of reality.

---

C. Rational Devotion - Philosophy as a Spiritual Practice

Plato and Aristotle did not conceive of philosophy as merely intellectual. Their systems implicitly define philosophy as a way of life, requiring discipline, moral formation, and contemplative depth. To think well is to live well, and to live well is to align oneself with the deeper structure of reality.

Several features illustrate this:

• For Plato, the ascent toward the Good is an act of moral purification and intellectual illumination.

• For Aristotle, the practice of virtue is inseparable from the cultivation of reason, and contemplation is the highest human activity.

• In both systems, the divine is understood through rational reflection, not mythic revelation.

The result is a distinctive form of rational faith: a commitment to the proposition that truth, goodness, and order are discoverable through disciplined inquiry and that human flourishing depends on aligning oneself with this intelligible structure.

This marks a significant Axial transformation. The sacred becomes a matter of understanding, not appeasement; of contemplation, not sacrifice; of intellectual harmony, not mythic drama.

---

D. Plato and Aristotle's early influences on Christian Apocalyptic Eschatology

Plato and Aristotle exerted markedly different influences on early Christian eschatological imagination, even when neither was adopted explicitly in the earliest apocalyptic texts. Plato’s thought aligned more naturally with early Christian apocalypticism, particularly in its dualistic structure and teleological orientation. Platonic metaphysics distinguished between the visible, transient world of becoming and an invisible, eternal realm of true reality. Early Christian apocalyptic eschatology similarly envisioned history as divided between the present age and the age to come, with salvation involving deliverance from corruption, decay, and injustice into a transformed, perfected order. The Platonic notion that the soul participates in a higher reality beyond the material world resonated with Christian ideas of resurrection, judgment, and participation in God’s eternal kingdom, even when bodily resurrection rather than pure immortality was affirmed. In this sense, Plato provided a conceptual grammar that made apocalyptic hope intelligible within a Hellenistic context.

By contrast, Aristotle’s philosophy was largely incompatible with early Christian apocalyptic expectations. Aristotle’s cosmos was eternal, hierarchically ordered, and teleologically complete, governed by intrinsic purposes rather than historical rupture. There is no final judgment, no radical transformation of history, and no eschatological consummation in Aristotle’s system. The Unmoved Mover does not intervene in time, redeem history, or respond to injustice. As a result, Aristotle offered little conceptual support for apocalyptic ideas such as resurrection, divine judgment, or the overturning of present political and cosmic orders. For this reason, Aristotle exerted minimal influence on early Christian apocalypticism and only became theologically significant much later, when Christianity shifted from apocalyptic expectation toward metaphysical systematization and institutional stability.

In short, Plato’s vertical transcendence could be adapted to apocalyptic hope, while Aristotle’s immanent teleology resisted it. Early Christianity leaned Platonically when it spoke of cosmic renewal and participation in divine life, and only later, as eschatology softened into systematic doctrine and church hierarchal order, did Aristotle become useful as a philosophical ally. Hence, Christianity’s move away from apocalyptic expectation toward metaphysical systematization and institutional stability coincides with the formation of catholic (sic, universal) Christianity, as the Church adapted to historical endurance and non-apocalyptic rupture by translating apocalyptic hope into theological structure.

---

Section III Summary

Plato and Aristotle constructed the first comprehensive architectures of rational faith. Plato elevated the soul’s ascent toward eternal Forms, while Aristotle revealed purpose, structure, and intelligibility within the natural world itself. Both reimagined the divine not as mythic personality but as the source of order, harmony, and truth. Their systems transformed philosophy into a spiritual discipline and established reason as a path toward the sacred.

---

IV. The Hellenistic Schools and the Logos of the Cosmos

With the conquests of Alexander and the expansion of Greek culture across the Eastern Mediterranean, the intellectual landscape of Greece underwent a profound transformation. The classical city-state declined, older civic cults lost their centrality, and individuals faced a more cosmopolitan and uncertain world. In this environment, philosophical schools emerged not simply as speculative enterprises but as comprehensive ways of life. They aimed to provide guidance, stability, and meaning in a shifting world.

What unites the Hellenistic schools is their shared commitment to a rationally ordered cosmos and the belief that human flourishing depends on aligning oneself with this order. Whether through virtue, tranquility, or disciplined doubt, the sacred became inseparable from the structure of nature itself. The divine was no longer a distant figure in myth but a principle that permeated the world and could be discerned through disciplined inquiry.

---

A. The Stoics - Logos as the Rational Soul of the Universe

The Stoics developed the most explicit articulation of Logos as the rational structure that orders all things. For them, the cosmos is a living, unified organism permeated by divine reason. The Logos is not merely a logical principle; it is a fiery, creative breath (pneuma) that organizes matter, sustains the world, and directs all events toward a rational whole.

Human beings, as rational creatures, participate in this cosmic rationality. To live well is to live in accordance with Logos, accepting the natural order of things and cultivating inner virtue as the true measure of freedom. For the Stoics, virtue is the only genuine good, and all external conditions are indifferent in comparison to the integrity of the rational soul.

The Stoic worldview is deeply religious in structure. The Logos functions as a divine presence immanent within nature, and philosophical practice becomes a form of spiritual alignment. Wisdom, in this context, is a devotional act: the acceptance of the world’s rational order as a manifestation of divine reason.

---

B. Epicureanism - The Pursuit of Tranquility and the Reframing of the Divine

In contrast to Stoic immanence, the Epicureans proposed a universe composed of atoms moving through the void. Their physics grounded a practical philosophy: the gods, if they exist, are blissful beings unconcerned with human affairs. The universe contains no providential order, no divine punishment, and no cosmic teleology.

The Epicurean spiritual project was the pursuit of ataraxia - tranquility of mind - achieved by freeing oneself from fear, superstition, and irrational desire. Ritual sacrifice and mythic dread were replaced with scientific understanding and ethical moderation. Though often misunderstood as hedonistic, Epicureanism promoted a disciplined life oriented toward peace, friendship, and philosophical clarity.

In this framework, reverence is directed not toward divine intervention but toward the peaceful order of nature itself. The sacred becomes the experience of freedom from fear and the cultivation of inner harmony.

---

C. Skepticism - Humility Before the Limits of Reason

Skeptics challenged the claim that knowledge of ultimate reality could be attained with certainty. Faced with competing philosophical systems, they concluded that the wise person suspends judgment and seeks freedom from disturbance through intellectual humility.

Skepticism is not a denial of the sacred but a recognition that the cosmos exceeds the grasp of human certainty. By refraining from dogmatic assertions, the Skeptic cultivates a form of serenity rooted in the acceptance of human finitude. This too is a philosophical spirituality, grounded in disciplined doubt and experiential openness.

---

D. Logos as the Unifying Theme of Hellenistic Thought

Despite their differences, the Hellenistic schools share a common conviction: the cosmos possesses a rational, intelligible structure, and human flourishing requires harmony with that structure.

• For the Stoics, Logos is divine reason immanent in nature.

• For the Epicureans, understanding nature releases the mind from fear.

• For the Skeptics, rational (epistemic) humility aligns the soul with the limits of human understanding.

In each case, philosophy becomes a comprehensive spiritual practice, joining metaphysics, ethics, psychology, and devotion into a unified way of life. The sacred is no longer located in mythic drama or cultic act but in the encounter with the rational or natural order of the universe.

This transformation shaped later Jewish-Hellenistic thought, early Christian theology, and the metaphysical foundations of Western intellectual history. The Greek discovery of Logos - rational, ethical, and cosmic - remains one of the defining contributions of the Axial Age.

---

Section IV Summary

The Hellenistic schools completed the shift from mythic religion to rational spirituality. The Stoics identified the divine with the Logos that orders all things. The Epicureans reframed the divine as tranquil indifference, redirecting devotion toward a peaceful life. The Skeptics cultivated serenity through disciplined doubt. Together, these movements established the cosmos as a rational, intelligible whole and philosophy as a path toward living in harmony with it.

---

V. Summary and Conclusion

The Greek contribution to the Axial Age represents a decisive transformation in the history of the sacred. Unlike Israel, which framed the divine in ethical and relational terms, or India, which turned inward toward liberation and the metaphysics of consciousness, Greece undertook the bold experiment of seeking the sacred through reason. This shift in Greece did not begin in philosophical argument but in the poetic imagination of Homer and Hesiod, whose myths offered a symbolic map of human fate, cosmic drama, and moral struggle. From these stories emerged the first philosophical inquiries, as early thinkers sought principles that could explain the unity, diversity, and intelligibility of the world.

The Pre-Socratics initiated this transformation by proposing rational structures - elements, forces, principles, and metaphysical necessities - that comprehended the cosmos as an ordered whole. Their debates set the stage for the monumental systems of Plato and Aristotle, who together established a vision of reality in which truth, goodness, purpose, and intelligibility form the deepest architecture of the universe. In their hands, philosophy became a spiritual discipline, a way of turning the soul toward the highest realities and aligning human life with the deeper structure of existence.

The Hellenistic schools extended these insights into practical programs for living. Stoicism articulated a cosmos permeated by divine reason. Epicureanism provided a therapeutic liberation from fear through natural understanding. Skepticism cultivated intellectual humility as a path to serenity. In each case, philosophy became a mode of spiritual life, oriented toward inner harmony and cosmic alignment.

Through these developments, Greece transformed the sacred from mythic personality to rational principle, from dramatic narrative to intelligible order, from ritual observance to contemplative inquiry. The Greek Axial Age revealed that the search for truth could itself be a form of devotion, that the cosmos is worthy of rational respect, and that the human mind can participate in the ordering principles of reality. This legacy shaped Hellenistic Judaism, early Christianity, Islamic philosophy, medieval scholasticism, Renaissance humanism, and even modern scientific rationality. It remains one of the most enduring contributions to the history of world thought.

---

Coda - Logo and the Processual Imagination

The Greek discovery of Logos marked a crucial moment in the evolution of human religious consciousness. For the first time, the sacred was identified not primarily with divine personality nor ritual performance but with the intelligible order of reality itself. Whether in Heraclitus’s dynamic tension of opposites, Plato’s rational Forms, Aristotle’s purposive cosmos, or the Stoic vision of an immanent rational fire, Greek thinkers intuited that the world is structured by patterns that can be grasped, interpreted, and lived into.

From a process-theological perspective, these intuitions point toward deeper metaphysical truths that Greek philosophy only partially articulated. The Greeks recognized that reality is ordered, rational, and permeated with meaning. What they lacked - and what process thought later supplies - is a full metaphysics of becoming, relationality, and emergent creativity.

Greek cosmologies tended to freeze the intelligible into static ontologies. Plato’s Forms exist in changeless perfection. Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover is pure actuality without becoming. Even the Stoic Logos, though dynamic in its ordering activity, is ultimately cyclical and predetermined. In these systems, change is often secondary, derivative, or an imperfection to be overcome.

Process thought reverses this valuation. It sees becoming, not static being, as the ultimate metaphysical category. The world is not a completed architecture but an unfolding creative advance in which new possibilities emerge at every moment. Logos, in this reframing, is not a timeless rational blueprint but the lure toward richer patterns of order, beauty, and relational coherence. It is the persuasive invitation inherent in each moment of becoming, calling the world toward greater harmony and complexity.

Seen in this light, Greek rational spirituality can be understood as an early articulation of a deeper processual intuition: that meaning is woven into the fabric of reality, that the cosmos is not chaotic but patterned, and that human beings participate in these patterns through thought, virtue, contemplation, and creativity.

Heraclitus’s notion of a hidden harmony within tension anticipates the process idea that creativity emerges from contrast. Plato’s vision of the Good as the source of intelligibility resonates with the process belief that value is primordial and that all becoming participates in an aesthetic aim. Aristotle’s teleology, though static in its final causes, anticipates the process view of teleological becoming, where aims adapt and evolve through relational interplay. The Stoic Logos as immanent rational fire approaches the process notion of the divine as intimately involved in the world’s unfolding, though process thought rejects Stoic determinism in favor of creative freedom.

By integrating these Greek insights with a metaphysics of dynamic relationality, process thought offers a way to honor the rational breakthroughs of the Axial Age while avoiding the limitations of classical substance metaphysics. In this processual reframing, the sacred is not the immutable but the ever-evolving; not the static form but the creative pattern; not the unmoved mover but the divine presence that “moves all things forward” through persuasion, relationality, and the continual invitation toward greater beauty.

Thus the Greek discovery of Logos becomes part of a longer story: the emergence of a worldview in which reason, relationality, and creativity converge. What began in early reflections on myth, nature, and cosmic order finds new expression in modern process cosmology, where the rational structure of the universe is understood as dynamic, participatory, evolving, and filled with divine possibility.

In this sense, process theology does not reject the Greek legacy. It fulfills it. It completes the intuition that the world is ordered, meaningful, and suffused with rational beauty - not by freezing reality into unchanging forms, but by showing how order and meaning arise through the creative advance of the world. The Logos of the Greeks becomes, in this metamodern processual vision, the relational lure at the heart of every moment of becoming.

---

~ Continue to Part IV, Essay 9 ~

Evolution of Worship & Religion

• Introduction
• Maps, Tables & Data
• A Proposed Outline
• Resources

• Part I - Foundations: The Birth of the Sacred
• Essay 1 - Animism and the Living Cosmos
• Essay 2 - From Tribe to Totem

• Part II - The Age of Gods
• Essay 3 - The Mesopotamian Fertile Crescent
• Essay 4 - Egypt, Indus, and Minoa Sacred Cultures
• Essay 5 - From Polytheism to Henotheism

• Part III - Axial Awakenings
• Essay 6 - Ancient Israel, Persia, and Monotheism
• Essay 7 - India's Axial Age
• Essay 8 - Greece and the Birth of Reason

• Part IV - The Sacred Made Universal
• Essay 9 - The Age of Universal Religions
• Essay 10 - Modernity and the Eclipse of the Sacred
• Essay 11 - The Rebirth of the Sacred
• Essay 12 - A Processual Summation of Worship and Religion
• Essay 13 - The Way of Cruciformity: When God Refused Power

• Part V - Supplementary Materials
• I - The Ancient History of Mesopotamia
• II - The History of Language in Ancient Mesopotamia
• III - The Ancient History of the Hebrew Language
• IV(A-C) How the Ancient Near East Gave Shape to Israel's God
• Why the ANE is Essential for Israel's Received Theology (I-II)
• Affecting Cultic Syncretism Across the Ancient Near East (III-V)
• Cultural Identity Formation & the Rejection of Syncretism (VI-IX)
• V (A-C) The History & Compilation of the Hebrew Bible
• From Oral Memory to Proto-Canon (I-II)
• Exile, Redaction, and the Birth of Scripture (III)
• Second Temple Scribalization to Canonization (IV-V)
• VI - The Unhelpful Oxymorons of "Biblical Authority" & "Inerrancy"
• VII - The Evolution of Inerrancy: From Ancient Plurality to Modern Certainty
• VIII - A Historical-Theological Study of "Son of Man" vs "Son of God"
• IX - The Song of Gilgamesh & Other Ancient Flood Stories

---

BIBLIOGRAPHY

---

Primary Sources - Greek, Hebrew-Persian, and Indian Traditions

• Aristotle - Metaphysics, Nicomachean Ethics, Physics.

• Epicurus - Letter to Menoeceus, Principal Doctrines.

• Heraclitus - Fragments.

• Hesiod - Theogony, Works and Days.

• Homer - Iliad, Odyssey.

• Plato - Republic, Phaedo, Timaeus, Symposium.

• Parmenides - On Nature.

• Rig Veda; Upanishads (various translations).

• Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes - Fragments.

• Zoroaster - Gathas (Yasna 28–34).

---

Greek Philosophy - Major Secondary Sources

• Barnes, Jonathan. Early Greek Philosophy.

• Burnet, John. Early Greek Philosophy.

• Cooper, John. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy.

• Guthrie, W.K.C. A History of Greek Philosophy (6 vols).

• Hadot, Pierre. What is Ancient Philosophy?

• Irwin, Terence. Classical Thought.

• Jaeger, Werner. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development.

• Kahn, Charles. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus.

• Kenny, Anthony. Ancient Philosophy.

• Long, A.A., and Sedley, David. The Hellenistic Philosophers.

• McKirahan, Richard. Philosophy Before Socrates.

• Nussbaum, Martha. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics.

• Owen, G.E.L. Logic, Science, and Dialectic: Collected Papers.

• Vlastos, Gregory. Platonic Studies.

---

Greek Religion and Mythology

• Burkert, Walter. Greek Religion.

• Burkert, Walter. The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture.

• Henrichs, Albert. Keeping the Gods at Bay: The Character of Ancient Greek Religion.

• Parker, Robert. Athenian Religion: A History.

• Pomeroy, Sarah et al. Ancient Greece: A Political, Social, and Cultural History.

• Smith, Jonathan Z. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and Religions of Late Antiquity.

• Vernant, Jean-Pierre. Myth and Thought Among the Greeks.

• Vernant, Jean-Pierre. The Origins of Greek Thought.

• West, M.L. The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth.

---

Persian and Zoroastrian Traditions

• Boyce, Mary. Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices.

• Boyce, Mary. A History of Zoroastrianism (3 vols).

• Shaked, Shaul. Dualism in Transformation: Varieties of Religion and Their Impact.

• Zaehner, R.C. The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism.

• Stausberg, Michael. Zoroastrianism: A Guide for the Perplexed.

• Kellens, Jean. Essays on Zarathustra and Zoroastrianism.

---

Indian Tradition - Vedic, Upanishadic, and Classical Hindu Thought

• Doniger, Wendy. The Hindus: An Alternative History.

• Flood, Gavin. An Introduction to Hinduism.

• Gerson, Lloyd. From Plato to Platonism (relevant for comparative metaphysics).

• Olivelle, Patrick. The Early Upanishads.

• Radhakrishnan, S. Indian Philosophy (2 vols).

• Sarma, Deepak. Hinduism: A Reader.

• Thapar, Romila. The Penguin History of Early India.

• Wilkins, William J. Hindu Mythology and Religion (older but still influential).

---

Axial Age and Comparative Religion

• Armstrong, Karen. The Great Transformation: The Beginning of Our Religious Traditions.

• Bellah, Robert N. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age.

• Eisenstadt, S.N., ed. The Origins and Diversity of Axial Age Civilizations.

• Halton, Eugene. From the Axial Age to the Moral Revolution.

• Jaspers, Karl. The Origin and Goal of History.

• Assmann, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization.

• Assmann, Jan. The Invention of Religion.

---

Process Philosophy, Theology, and Greek Reception

• Clayton, Philip. The Problem of God in Modern Thought.

• Cobb, John B., and Griffin, David Ray. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition.

• Griffin, David Ray. Whitehead’s Radically Different Postmodern Philosophy.

• Hartshorne, Charles. Man’s Vision of God.

• Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery.

• Neville, Robert C. Creativity and God: A Challenge to Process Theology.

• Suchocki, Marjorie Hewitt. God, Christ, Church.

• Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality.

• Williams, Daniel D. The Spirit and the Forms of Love.