Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write off the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Wednesday, September 7, 2022

John B. Cobb, Jr. – A Journey of Faith in Process



Biography of John B. Cobb, Jr.


A Note to My Most Recent Friend
and Mentor, Dr. John Cobb, Jr.

whom I've met through his writings, speaking events,
and friends, but never in person...

As a former fundamentalist Baptist and Reformed evangelical who spent many a year knocking on community doors, speaking with families in their living rooms, developing children and youth neighborhood ministries. Who served in a variety of community ministries including lay teaching, lay pastoring, choir ministries - including area concerts; served as a camp counselor to high school students, and later, as lay pastor-teacher to college, career, and young adult ministries. Who served in family and adult ministries, church visitations, campus evangelism, lay counseling, money and life management counseling, and on congregational board and committee assignments, including church-wide special congregational ministries like developing grass roots assimilation programs without paid staff; Sunday School development projects; the creation of Easter Sedar's, Holiday Christmas Concerts, and etc, and etc. While also not forgetting lengthy personal training through the Sunday Schools, an undergraduate education from a small, private Baptist College including a 3 year Master's of Divinity from that same Baptist Seminary.

All of this I mention that I might say with the Apostle Paul, that I have some little background in the Christian faith - and, as my earlier Christian friends might say back a few years ago, though I doubt they would any more - "of the right kind,"  amongst themselves, though I myself, cannot now admit this statement of hubris. Yet the former Jewish Rabbi or Rabbis, the Apostle of Apostles, Paul flatly stated to all who would listen to him, that his theology required a completion in the person of Christ, the Messiah of Israel, and Savior of the world.

Old Wineskins Pass

And so, I wish to say similarly that the grand Christian tradition in which I was raised and taught now requires some bit of tweaking, if not a whole different foundation. One built on love and compassion. Which might embed itself into communities in healthy, holistic ways. One which would cease from its legalisms and dominionistic yearnings....

And sadly, to my general regret, I wish these thoughts might have come sooner to my heart than they did, though they did come through my own emergent Christian experiences over a twelve year period which were at once preceded by, and later, superseded by, a variety of forms of progressive Christianity (re: the old church term of "Chrisitan Humanism" where it at one time later became known as the social gospel, and now, today, as social justice).

Where I once shunned these works over faith perspectives I now embrace without lessening the importance of a salvific faith, but like the book of James, am adding with a lot of vigor the necessity of Jesus professing Christians to act Christianly to their families, friends, and community. Otherwise, it is a legalizing, militant faith of no worth no matter what it tells itself.

And so, after perhaps a thirty year period of deliberation between myself and God;  with friends and family; and with parts of my Christian fellowship; I have come belatedly to a form of Jesus-based Process Christianity. Which is no less progressive in its faith as seen in its emergent or progressive elements but which is removing a poor philosophical metaphysic for a much broader, more organic kind. One which I will try to explain.

New Wineskins Arise

Firstly, let me say that Dr. Cobb is coming from a Methodist background, born into a family serving the Lord as missionaries in Japan. As he has come to know the Christian faith he has altered it a bit based upon a number of good reasons he believes is more helpful than the choices he was presented. These will be observed as he speaks. And though I differ on some theological points I can still use his thoughts to address my faith in its overall substance and outreach.

But for myself, and for the kind of Process Christianity I am espousing, I have not, and do not intend to lessen the Godhead of Father, Son, and Spirit, nor their deity, nor the efficacy of the atoning work of the virgin born Jesus who was resurrected from the dead and serves the Father now.

But what I wish to convey through readings in John Cobb and my developing forms of post-evangelical, Reformed and Reforming, process theology is not the banishment of Christology but its enhancement by doing away with some of the unhelpful measures of traditional theological creeds, statements, and dogmas which reduce God, the Godhead, the presence of the ministry of the Spirit in the world, or the quality of redemption provided to us in Christ Jesus because of those theological statements of generations past expressed in non-processual belief.

So as you listen to Dr. Cobb do listen broadly to determine with me how Whitehead's process philosophy might be interpreted Christianly when approaching a God of Love rather than as we have consigning God to the churchly roles of wrath and condemnation. I wish to develop with you, church theologies centered all the time, 100%, in the Love of God as shown to us by Jesus, who was, and is, fully God and fully human, to no lessening of either of his cosmic or earthly ontology.

A Short History of Wineskins

Too, having emerged from whatever form of emergent/progressive Christianity I was a part of during the latter part of my life I will state for the record that my course now is laid in towards a post-evangelical form utilizing process philosophy and theology to better inform my faith than had Protestant Greek Hellenism, Catholic Scholasticism, pre-scientific Enlightenment thought, or this past Modernistic era of the 1800s forward that we, as the people of God, have come through.

What this means is that I have gone through a deeply significant evolution of my faith during mid-life which came too late, having begun more formally in my early fifties. One whereby I began to deconstruct and reconstruct all previous modernistic statements about the bible and Godhead, its related beliefs and theological statements, and personal life investments about a God Who has more recently directed my final ministries and teachings along a path of love, Jesus-based practices, and with much less condemnation and judgment upon the world at large.

Although I cannot say the same myself about my straying brethren who are spiritually stuck in their lives in many ways as I was. But again, if prophecy is a transitioning gift between the Testaments, as I believe it is, a prophet's job is one of pronouncement to the works and attitudes of the Spirit of God present with us to direct minds and hearts back to God Himself.

Moreover, love doesn't come easy to me... as I suspect it doesn't for many. As a good Baptist and conservative fundamentalist later to become a conservative evangelic, I learned to expand my religious culture by learned habits of comparing my faith to that of others. One which I think is necessary, but which requires a lot more levity, understanding, and compassion than how I was taught. I might also blame a competitive upbringing, a lot of verbal abuse, and a public identity of feeling unworthy of love, but those are really my own issues to deal with against a past which in Jesus, and by the power of the Spirit, I may put away in the Cross of Christ.

If now this habit of condemning and judging persists in me, it does so not towards the non-Christian but more directly in my attitudes towards my own Christian faith as I appeal to healthier forms of expression against its legalisms, Pharisaical attitudes, systematic racisms, and militant violence. For myself, a Jesus-based Process Christianity is helping me, by the Spirit of Christ, to re-embrace the world and become a healthy part of living within it; one seeking quieter forms of ministry and service when speaking to Christ rather than settling to wait for heaven while participating in exclusionary practices of uncivil, inhumanitarian fellowship.

Putting Away Childish Things

Lastly, I should note that having removed my Calvinistic background in favor of Arminianism (sic, Wesleyanism without its "positional loss of salvation" mind you), and having developed that aspect of a "non-controlling God including a freewill theology" I have consequently moved into Arminianism's more contemporary forms of open and relational theology. And having struggled to reimagine my Calvinistic faith with Calvinism, I have steadily been progressing towards a processual form of all my past training, beliefs, practices, and education. Hence, I am writing of an Open and Relational PROCESS Theology. Once which is a part of the overall picture of Process Christianity. One which has as its hermeneutical center:

  • God's Love
  • Of reading a bible which not woodenly literal
  • placing Jesus, God's Son, at its center as prime exhibitor of the God who loves
  • and, re-interpreting evangelical theology into generatively healing forms of post-evangelic, process theology

This means that our Westernized Christian philosophically-based theologies based on Platonism, Scholasticism, Enlightenment, and Modernity must be written away from these forms too read the Author of the bible in terms of love rather than in terms of not loving. Hence, I am methodically removing these unhelpful attitudes of God and God's loving sovereignty in the world towards a Whiteheadian form of Process Philosophy being exhibited now in its fourth generation of interpretive effort (sic, Thomas Oord, Bruce Epperly, Jay McDaniel, Tripp Fuller, perhaps Peter Enns as he, like myself, are coming to understand what a Process Theology and Christianity might mean). Which also means that as Dr. John Cobb, who is now 97, but in the videos below was speaking at the ripe old age of 95 as a second generation of Whiteheadian/Hartshornian process theologian, is finishing up a lifetime of process studies in his Christian faith. And as he does its very process is being extended in every way imaginable including science and ecological societies.

Lastl, like Dr. Cobb, there are many who are developing a wide variety of process-based global religious and Christian beliefs which are forming a common basis with one another to speak to life differently than modernity has been these past several hundred years. Processual faiths which are based upon their temporal, geographical and cultural-religious settings. For myself, it is Christ and how Christ's love can be meaningful to the world around me. To others, it may be as guidance to a more loving Islamic or Hindu or Christian faith. Process Philosophy can do that as an Integral Theory. And should it continue to hold to its center of love I believe there is a lot which a process form of living might do in helping develop futuristic ecological civilizations learning to lean into one another, listening, serving, and helping one another when replacing militant violence with healthier forms of socio-politico and economic religious-cultural discussions.

All for now,

R.E. Slater
September 7, 2022

* * * * * *


CLAREMONT UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
The Cobb Institute by John B. Cobb, Jr.
May 22, 2022

John B. Cobb, Jr. taught theology at the Claremont School of Theology from 1958 to 1990. He is the author of more than fifty books. In retirement he lives at Pilgrim Place in Claremont. In 1973, with David Griffin, he established the Center for Process Studies. Throughout his career he has contributed to Whitehead scholarship and promoted process-relational programs and organizations. In recent years he has given special attention to supporting work toward the goal of China to become an ecological civilization. He led the effort to found the Claremont Institute for Process Studies in early 2019, and the organization was renamed in his honor one year later.

The Cobb Institute promotes process and relational ways of understanding and living in the world, seeking to cultivate ecological civilizations through just and compassionate communities. Its vision is to advance wisdom, harmony, and the common good through holistic education, community building, and spiritual exploration.

* * * * * *

John B. Cobb, Jr. – A Journey of Faith in Process
Jul 5, 2020


No, the Bible is not an infallible book of rules; but, yes, it can guide a life. No, God is not an all-controlling power; but, yes, God is a companion to the world’s joys and sufferings, and an indwelling lure to radical love. No, Jesus is not a man to be worshipped as an infallible deity; but, yes, he is a savior for the world, in whose compassionate way of living we can share, and who appeared after his death to his disciples, giving hope for all. These are among the ideas we hear from John B. Cobb, an American theologian, philosopher, and environmentalist, known as the preeminent proponent of process philosophy and theology. In this Conversation in Process, John Cobb, age 95, shares his journey in faith with Jay McDaniel and, along the way, reveals a poignant life in process.

* * * * * *



Hosted by Jay McDaniel, Conversations in Process aims to understand and explore a process outlook on life, with its emphasis on inter-becoming; the intrinsic value of all life; the presence of fresh possibilities; and the need create communities that are creative, compassionate, diverse, inclusive, and participatory; humane to animals, and good for the earth, with no one left behind.

We also aim to learn from people that practice what we call the process way, even if they’re not especially interested in the process outlook. One of the practices of the process way is to listen; it’s to learn from people; it’s to be humble in the presence of others, and realize they may have wisdom we lack. So in these conversations we’ll be talking to some people who know a lot about the process outlook, and some who know very little, but who practice in ways that we want to learn from.

* * * * * *



About the Institute

Named in honor of our founder John Cobb, the Cobb Institute is inspired by the knowledge that all life is interconnected and in process of becoming. With this comprehensive vision, we engage in initiatives that foster the flourishing of individuals, communities, and our common home—the planet we all inhabit. We thus seek to advance ways of understanding and living that embrace this view in order to bring about fundamental transformations.

As a philosophical outlook, process-relational thought provides a holistic perspective on our place in the world, and invites us to attune ourselves to more integral modes of being. We live out this philosophy by providing values-driven education, engaging in creative collaboration, and promoting an open view of spirituality to help each other and our communities thrive. This is a bold collaborative endeavor that recognizes our interbecoming and interdependence, and thus emphasizes that we have a responsibility to care, not just for our own lives but also for the world we share with everyone and everything else.

Our Mission

The Cobb Institute promotes process and relational ways of understanding and living in the world, seeking to cultivate ecological civilizations through just and compassionate communities.

Our Vision

Our vision is to advance wisdom, harmony, and the common good through holistic education, community building, and spiritual exploration. We work toward transformations:
  • from a world of static objects to a process of dynamic becoming;
  • from a fragmented world to a relational world;
  • from a human-centered world to an eco-centered world;
  • from isolated communities to communities of communities;
  • from oppressive social orders to a world of justice;
  • from mutual defensiveness to mutual support;
  • from the goal of wealth to the goal of happiness and wellbeing;
  • from isolated individuals to persons-in-community;
  • from knowledge as mere data to knowledge as wisdom nourished by multiple ways of knowing;
  • from the primacy of analysis to the primacy of creative synthesis;
  • from attachment to dogmatic ideologies to openness to evidence;
  • from life-denying spiritualities to life-affirming spiritualities.
  • from nature as mechanistic to nature as alive;
  • from coercive power to the power of love.

* * * * * *


https://cobb.institute/spiritual-integration/


Fostering Spiritual Vitality

Fostering spiritual vitality encompasses our efforts in spiritual exploration and the arts. Through spiritual integration we explore diverse possibilities for embodied wisdom and emotional intelligence in daily life, as responsive to a healing spirit at work in the world. We seek to learn from and offer resources for multiple faith communities, to honor many different ways of wisdom, and to welcome both traditional and novel expressions of spirituality.

Art comes in many forms. Visual art is just one creative expression. The universe itself, as Whitehead says, is an expression of the "creative advance into novelty." Every moment in a person's life is thus an act of improvisation, a moment in which something new is created out of a settled past.


* * * * * *


https://cobb.institute/community-collaboration/

Promoting Heathy Communities

We promote healthy communities through strategic collaborations that will locally manifest ecological civilization. We work to convene, connect, and catalyze: convening important conversations, connecting synergistic partners, and catalyzing vital initiatives that will achieve the community’s goals in ways that increase its sustainability, resilience, and long-term well-being.

Our View

Promoting healthy communities puts process-relational philosophy into practice. Our view includes the following underlying principles:

  • Reality is relational, that is, all things are interconnected.
  • Everything in the world is constituted by its relationships to other things, and nothing exists in complete isolation.
  • Because relationships form the core of reality, we seek to build healthy relationships, relationships that are mutually beneficial, relationships that seek balance, harmony, and synergy.
  • Reality is valuable, that is, all things have intrinsic value. Everything possesses value in and for itself, and not just for others.
  • Because all things have value, we affirm the equality of every person, work for just relationships between neighbors, and seek the inclusion and accommodation of all within communities as they grow together.
  • Healthy communities are compassionate, diverse, and open to all, regardless of race, ethnicity, or economic status.
  • Healthy communities recognize they are part of a larger world that matters, and that their actions have a real impact on the world, for better or worse.
  • Healthy communities thus seek to bring about an ecological civilization.
  • Promoting Healthy Communities - people - crop

Our Approach

Our approach seeks "creative localization," which is comprised of six dimensions:

  • Energy: Generating power locally from renewable sources such as solar, wind, and hydrogen, and where possible, using technology created and stored locally.
  • Food: Growing food locally or regionally using regenerative agriculture techniques that work cooperatively with nature and the Earth.
  • Housing: Developing affordable housing in blended neighborhoods that encourage mutual support.
  • Education: Engaging all individuals in a life-long process of discovery to contribute creatively and meaningfully to society with values rooted in humanity, community and ecology, and to live joyously in harmony with diversity.
  • Culture: Developing a culture that values balance, sufficiency, human freedom and creative expression, rather than acquisition, consumption and servitude.
  • Economics: Pursuing economic policies that maximize the well-being of all and the ecological sustainability of the planet.

What does the "process way" contribute to community work?

A holistic, systemic perspective: We encourage holistic, cross-disciplinary thinking about complex challenges.

A preference for transformational strategies: We stay alert to cues (or “lures”) from the environment for the best possible paths forward at any given moment to the most fulfilling future available. When our efforts align with the forces of nature, those forces begin to energize, sustain and open up pathways.

An inclination to collaborate: We search for synergies with our partners and magnify our impact by promoting the work of others.


* * * * * *


https://cobb.institute/educational-development/

Advancing Educational Possibilities

Advancing educational possibilities encompasses our efforts in holistic education. Our desire is to provide educational offerings, experiences, and resources that are centered around process-relational philosophy. If we take seriously Whitehead’s challenge to make “life” the focal point of education, our work has a never-ending agenda: to gain wisdom and understanding in multiple facets of life, to enhance and deepen the rhythm of teaching and learning, and to integrate the various fields of inquiry in order to help solve the serious challenges facing humans and the world we live in. In short, our aim is to provide insights and participate in actions toward the goal of realizing an ecological civilization.

Our View

Learning is something that can take place in any setting at any age. Our philosophy of education includes the following underlying principles:

  • All life deserves respect. Everything is connected; nothing in nature stands alone.
  • Thinking and feeling are connected; mind and body are not separate entities; aesthetic wisdom and rational inquiry are complementary.
  • There is a profound relationship between creativity, beauty, and life.
  • Learning begins by experiencing the presence of the world and being affected by it.
  • Happiness involves sharing experience with others and responding in harmony to these relationships.
  • Harmony includes differences as well as similarities.
  • Change is an ongoing component of reality; nothing ever stays the same. The process of reality is creative, emergent, evolutionary, and social.


Practices for all ages

With these fundamentals in mind, we seek to celebrate educational programs in which learning is an active process—a lifelong adventure of heart, mind and body.


Programs that begin in the romance of discovery and get certain basics right by...
  • Creating a climate of care and respect.
  • Helping students learn to cooperate and collaborate.
  • Encouraging curiosity and playfulness.
  • Exploring the wonder of glimpses of beauty.
  • Engaging students in learning by doing.
  • Experiencing the joy of genuine success.


Programs that develop precision and mastery by...
  • Investigating real-life projects.
  • Integrating learning across disciplines.
  • Inquiring in depth according the students’ interest and talents.
  • Persisting in questioning and practicing.
  • Encouraging problem finding as well as problem solving.
  • Developing modes of artistic creativity.


Programs that open out to make a positive difference in the world by...

  • Educating for justice.
  • Working toward ecological civilization.
  • Facing challenges as opportunities.
  • Seeking harmony of space, nature and spirit.
  • Building consensus and community.
  • Reaching out to different perspectives, backgrounds, and ages.

The principles and programs articulated above were authored by Lynn Sargent De Jonghe in an article entitled “Process Eduction” on Open Horizons.

Our Projects

To accomplish our objectives, the members of the educational development group participate in a wide variety of projects that fall under three main groupings:

Community Education

  • Through its Learning Lab, the Institute provides a range of in-depth internet classes in process thought taught by Dr. John B. Cobb, Jr. and other experts, which reach hundreds of participants. The lab also facilitates smaller groups of learning circles, discussion groups, and book studies to explore a variety topics an interests.
  • Middle Tree, a learning center located in Claremont, offers educational services and resources to students from elementary to high school students, provides a context for various members of the Institute to assist in student learning, and works with the Institute to develop curriculum for adult education. For example, we currently working with Middle Tree to develop programs that are designed to educate parents in the city of Pomona.
  • For our own growth in understanding process philosophy, friends of the Cobb Institute sometimes participate in the study of major topics and themes. For example, Dr. Richard Livingston, the Director of Operations for the Cobb Institute and a scholar of process-relational thought, guided us through Robert Mesle's excellent introductory text, Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead.
  • “Backyard Becomings,” a small informal gathering of friends who meet regularly for an evening meal and discussion about process texts and themes, is another expression of our attempt to experience a sense of community, as well as to participate in an opportunity for personal growth in process thought.

Higher Education

  • Guided by a process-relational view of education, and influenced by John Cobb's critique of “higher education,” members of our group challenge the assumption that developing value-free research experts in isolated fields is the ultimate goal of colleges and universities. Instead, we encourage students to become educated in transdisciplinary fields, with the intent of helping to solve the serious problems we face that threaten life as we now know it.
  • A task force at the University of La Verne is in the process of establishing the Institute for the Common Good, as well as developing a new major in sustainability studies.
  • We support the work of Flagstaff College, a small innovative school located in Flagstaff, Arizona, whose mission is to prepare students to be leaders in the democratic project of building sustainable, just, and beautiful communities and in creating ecological civilizations.

Spiritual Education

  • The development of educational materials about various religious traditions is the goal of yet others in the group. These materials and experiences assist in deepening one’s own tradition, but also in developing respect for other religious and non-religious groups, and enhancing dialogue between various traditions.

Spanning across each of these three areas, another goal of some of our members is to develop a website for a Global Network of Ecological Education. Co-sponsored by the Institute for Postmodern Development of China, the website aims to provide information and ideas for those interested in ways to work toward an ecological civilization.

Our interests are thus multiple, and intertwine with the Institute’s other main areas of focus: spiritual integration and community collaboration. We invite friends and advisors to join us in pursuing the educational development goals named above, and to expand that list as we work toward realizing an ecological civilization.


Sunday, September 4, 2022

The Rings of Power - NO SPOILERS - Thoughts and Links to the Second Age of Middle-Earth


* * * * * * *


The Rings of Power - NO SPOILERS -
Thoughts and Links to the Second Age of Middle-Earth 
This posting will attempt to not have any spoilers which might ruin viewer's enjoyment of the Prime Video Series, The Rings of Power.

To help with the lore and history of this new Tolkien Series the link here below will direct the reader to an Index of Tolkien's Middle-Earth Ages and Characters primarily of the First and Second Ages of Middle-Earth.

I am just now beginning to watch the new series and may post the Prime Video series after it's full episodic showings along with perhaps spoiler videos. Having watched the first two episodes and only one trailer (the one further below) I believe the Ring's setting is sometime in the Second Age after having had the luxury of peace for a long while since the first defeat of the mighty dark Lord Sauron.

Enjoy the Series and don't forget to link to the index immediately below to read about Middle-Earth's First and Second Ages!

R.E. Slater
September 4, 2022

PS-Since this is a process website I will introduce this relatively "new" philosophic / theologic metaphysic ahead of the index of subjects itself. Feel free to skip it until you're ready to digest the Tolkien which lies sublimely behind the page. Pages which we live out every day of our lives though we know it not. 
Here, I will introduce a few simple concepts and academic terms by relevant word pictures to help the novice grasp a subject not typically thought about and only recently coming to light though it lies all about us. 
Thus, my site. And thus, it's perspective. Filled with lands of resplendant vistas and hallowed glens by trying to reconcile past experiences with the new as we journey between worlds of dark and light like the elvish wanders of old rebuilding from the ruins of creation time-and-time again.
re slater




The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power
Official Trailer | Prime Video
Jul 14, 2022
The legend begins. #TheRingsOfPower

The Rings of Power brings to screens for the very first time the heroic legends of the fabled Second Age of Middle-earth's history. This epic drama is set thousands of years before the events of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, and will take viewers back to an era in which great powers were forged, kingdoms rose to glory and fell to ruin, unlikely heroes were tested, hope hung by the finest of threads, and the greatest villain that ever flowed from Tolkien’s pen threatened to cover all the world in darkness.
Beginning in a time of relative peace [beginning of Middle-Earth's Second Age], the series follows an ensemble cast of characters, both familiar and new, as they confront the long-feared re-emergence of evil to Middle-earth. From the darkest depths of the Misty Mountains, to the majestic forests of the elf-capital of Lindon, to the breathtaking island kingdom of Númenor, to the furthest reaches of the map, these kingdoms and characters will carve out legacies that live on long after they are gone.


The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power
Official Trailer | Prime Video
Aug 23, 2022

The Rings of Power brings to screens for the very first time the heroic legends of the fabled Second Age of Middle-earth's history. This epic drama is set thousands of years before the events of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, and will take viewers back to an era in which great powers were forged, kingdoms rose to glory and fell to ruin, unlikely heroes were tested, hope hung by the finest of threads, and the greatest villain that ever flowed from Tolkien’s pen threatened to cover all the world in darkness.
Beginning in a time of relative peace [beginning of Middle-Earth's Second Age], the series follows an ensemble cast of characters, both familiar and new, as they confront the long-feared re-emergence of evil to Middle-earth. From the darkest depths of the Misty Mountains, to the majestic forests of the elf-capital of Lindon, to the breathtaking island kingdom of Númenor, to the furthest reaches of the map, these kingdoms and characters will carve out legacies that live on long after they are gone.











      





enlarge

enlarge

enlarge

Author, Poet, Hobbit JRR Tolkien




Process Relational Ecological Civilizations Topics and Discussions




I wish to expand a bit on my last posting re i) "Whitehead's Contribution to Thinking Cosmologically in an Ecological civilization" and, ii) "How the integration of the sciences, humanity, and the universal (aka, spiritual) in Whiteheadian Process Thought."

Based on Matt Segall's book, "Physics of the World Soul," he will address in brief three main themes of conversation before the John Cobb forum panel in cross examination with John Eastman. Those three topics will concern i) the integration of evolution with ii) the quantum sciences and iii) Complexity theory utilizing the Whiteheadian process philosophy of cosmological metaphysics.

R.E. Slater
September 4, 2022


Thinking Cosmologically in an Ecological Civilization:
Whitehead's Contribution
October 21, 2020


Presenter: Matt Segall
Respondent: Timothy Eastman
Recording Date: September 15, 2020

*Unfortunately the Q&A was not included :(



https://cobb.institute/

What is ecological thinking?

One of the critical lessons that ecology is teaching us is that humans are not separate from nature, but are members of the web of life (Hes and Du Plessis 2014).

Ecoscenography 1.2

The first step to integrating ecological thinking into scenographic practice, involves grasping the fundamentals of ecology and living systems. Ecology demonstrates how eco-systems are not just a collection of species, but are also relational systems that connect humans, as organic systems, with animals and plants – It stimulates an increased understanding that the world is fundamentally interconnected and interdependent (Hes and Du Plessis 2014). From an ecological perspective, humans are not separate from nature but are deeply embedded in the ‘web of life’ (Capra 1994). As Naess (1989) suggests, “A human is not a thing…but a juncture in a relational system without determined boundaries in space and time” (1989: 79). Thus, humans are an integral part of the processes of co-creation and co-evolution that shape the living world (Hes and Du Plessis 2014).

Ecoscenography 1.3

Ecological thinking requires a broadening of identity in how we see ourselves in relationship to the world around us. Hes and Du Plessis explain that “as one’s identity expands, so does one’s view of the world. With these changed perceptions also come a change in values, behaviours and possible leverage points” (2014). Sean Esbjörn-Hargens (2010) describes this ‘widening of identity’ as a transition from ‘me’ (egocentric) to ‘my group ‘(ethnocentric) to ‘my country’ (sociocentric) to ‘all of us’ (worldcentric) to ‘all beings’ (planetcentric) to finally ‘all of reality’ (Kosmoscentric). In performance practice, this could be interpreted as a widening in identity from ‘me’ as the artist to considering how I might create work that actively engages with communities as well as the ‘living world’.

This notion of ‘creative expansion’ inspired by Esbjörn-Hargen’s ‘widening identity’, asks the performance maker and scenographer to engage with the work on multiple levels – it challenges the theatre artist to look beyond usual anthropocentric values (such as egocentric, ethnocentric, sociocentric and worldcentric perspectives) often adopted in the theatre practice to also incorporate planetcentric and kosmoscentric views.

The challenge of ecological thinking requires altering our assumptions, attitudes, to understand that we are participating in, and co-evolving with nature (Eisenberg and Reed, 2003: 3). In other words, in order to engage with the world from an ecological perspective, we need to see ourselves as part of (rather than above) nature – to engage with the ‘human’ aspects of our context in relationship to the [cosmo]biophysical context (Hes and Du Plessis 2014). This implies making a conscious effort to contemplate how our work as theatre practitioners might connect to broader communities and ‘living systems’.

Ecology incorporates principles of wholeness, interdependence, diversity, partnership, energy flows, flexibility, cycles and sustainability (DeKay 2011: 65). These themes of interconnection, relationship and co-existence underpin the value system of ecological thinking or what Dominique Hes and Chrisna du Plessis (2014) also describe as the ‘ecological worldview’. The ecological worldview presents a universe that consists of dynamic relationships and processes – It is a “globally integrated view, acknowledging and integrating diversity and previous levels of development, focusing on the long-term future of the world system” (Hes and Du Plessis 2014). In summary, the ecological worldview asks theatre artists and scenographers to think beyond the transient qualities of the theatre or site, to also understand how their work affects wider communities and living systems.

Ecological thinking is profoundly about understanding that ecology is not just about non-human things, it has to do with the way we imagine ourselves as part of nature (Morton 2010). Adopting an ecological perspective entails altering the lens through which we perceive the world and ourselves (Kegan 1982). At the core of this shift is a change in focus, a moving away from egocentric and anthropocentric thought (separateness) to include concepts of integration, awareness and holistic perception (interconnectedness). Mark DeKay explains that this is no easy cognitive task, but rather part of a transition in our developing capacity as humans (2011: 60). Despite this challenge, ecological thinking is crucial to designers of any discipline engaging with sustainability and offers a holistic approach to the possibilities of producing positive benefits as well as remediating past environmental damage (Zari and Jenkin 2010).



* * * * * * *


A Short Observation


This next section is a short review of a forum held at CIIS hosted by Matt Segall. It is of note that the term and practicum of cosmoecological civilization began in Communist Russia in the 1970s (although I would argue with native aboriginal tribal fellowships); was picked up and heightened by post-Maoist/Socialist China in the 1990s; and later, by the Western nations (Europe, America) in the 2000s.

Moreover, Process Thought (both in it's philosophy, theology, and touchstones in science et al.) speak across all socio-political economies and ethno-religious civilizations. It's why process thought works so well. Because it is so identifiable with the kind of reality we seem to live in and experience across all human studies and historical flow and event.

So don't let the word "Marxism" throw you off. I once took a class with the world renown French Maoist philosopher Alain Baidou who taught a class on Being and Event. One side of it approached process thought (my word, certainly not Alain's!) from Being and the other side approaches it from Event. In Whiteheadian terms we describe this process-like philosophy as "Being and Becoming."

Alain's work in this area is very like process thought but with important distinctions and if the Christian idea of the Gospel of Jesus had been inserted into Baidou's thought one couldn't have told the difference between the two. However, Alain is not a Christian, and was not teaching a Christian perspective. It is his own philosophy from a lifetime of experiencing and observing the cruelty of German Naziism and even crueler post-colonial French-Muslim class struggle in North Africa from the 1940s to the 1970s.

Though Alain sought a world of mutuality even so did Jesus in his time of Jewish-Roman unrest. Jesus called it "love." Today's ecologists might rethink these terms today when approaching new societal paradigms for integrative fellowships between-and-with all present relationships unfolding and enfolding into a future of present presences.

Enjoy,

R.E. Slater
September 4, 2020


Fifth annual conference of the World-
Ecology Research Network

“Planetary Utopias, Capitalist Dystopias: Justice, Nature,
and the Liberation of Life”

California Institute of Integral Studies in San Francisco, CA
May 30-June 1, 2019


Whitehead and Marx:
A Cosmopolitical Approach to Ecological Civilization

May 31, 2019

Below is a recording of my talk (a video first, then audio only that includes the discussion afterwards). I’ve also included an extended draft of some notes I took to prepare my talk. Finally, I’ve included my notes taken while listening to Jason Moore during yesterday’s opening lecture.


A few words about the words in the title:

Cosmopolitics” is an effort on the part of thinkers like Isabelle Stengers, Bruno Latour, and Donna Haraway to think beyond the modern human/nature and fact/value divides, or what Whitehead called the “bifurcation of nature.”

Civilization“?!? This phrase, “ecological civilization,” comes from China’s Communist Party. Achieving ecological civilization is one of their stated goals for the 21st century. In China there are now about 35 graduate programs and research centers devoted to Whitehead’s thought and process studies.

What does it mean, to Whitehead, to be “civilized”? He does not use the term in an exclusivist sense and is even willing to consider that some animals some of the time (e.g., squirrels) may be capable of it (see Modes of Thought). But usually not. It means a conscious recognition of and participation in the creative power of ideas–like freedom or love–to shape history.

“We find ourselves in a buzzing world, amid a democracy of fellow creatures.” -Alfred North Whitehead (Process and Reality).

Whitehead is not an idealist, however. Ideas only have power when the material and historical conditions are ripe, when a particular habitat can support their ingression.

Many moderns, Marx included, have too anthropocentric an idea of ideas. Ideas were already active in evolutionary processes long before conscious human beings emerged on the scene. Ideas are not just conjured up in human heads or scratched onto paper pages by human hands. Whitehead invites us to expand our conception so that we can sense that the idea of the Good generates the light and warmth of the Sun no less than the nuclear reactions and electromagnetic radiation known to physicists, that the idea of Beauty is at work in the evolution of peacocks and butterflies and roses and not just in Beethoven’s 9th or the Mona Lisa. Ideas don’t just shape history, they shape geohistory and indeed cosmic history.

“The basis of democracy is the common fact of value-experience, as constituting the essential nature of each pulsation of actuality. Everything has some value for itself, for others, and for the whole.” -Alfred North Whitehead (Modes of Thought 151).

Every bacterium enriching the soil, every bumble bee making honey in the hive, every human being participating in society, every star spiraling in the galaxy has value for itself, for others, and for the whole. Nonhumans not only have value, they are agents of value creation.

Whitehead (in a conversation with his wife Evelyn and the journalist Lucien Price in 1944) was asked if the prior half-century or so had any political thinkers as daring as those who inaugurated the new relativistic and quantum physics, he answered “There is Marx, of course; though I cannot speak of him with any confidence.” But he goes on to describe Marx as “the prophet of proletarian revolt” and marks the singular relevance of the fact that the first practical effectuation of his ideas [Soviet Russia under Lenin] occurred in a society dominated by farmers. Here we see Whitehead was ahead of his time in recognizing the importance of food sovereignty. Any serious resistance to capitalism must begin with soil and seeds.

What is value? We can discuss the differences between use v. exchange value, objective v. subjective value, but ultimately Marx says value is a social relation determined by the amount of labor time it requires to produce a commodity. Humans create value by working on raw material or dead nature.

Is all value really produced by human labor alone? Is there nothing extrahuman that supplies value? In Whitehead’s cosmos there is no mere matter or dead nature, no inert or raw material to be appropriated by something called Man.

Whitehead: “We have no right to deface the value-experience which is the very essence of the universe” (Modes of Thought 111).

We can link value to agency. Moderns, whether Locke, or Marx, or Hayak, limit agency and thus value-creation to human beings.

According to Latour, the abstract, idealistic materialism of classical Marxism misses the activity/agency of the world.

Latour: “We have never been modern in the very simple sense that while we emancipated ourselves, each day we also more tightly entangled ourselves in the fabric of nature.”

Despite his recognition of metabolic rift, Marx was fully modern in his commitment to what Latour calls the “double task of emancipation and domination” (We Have Never Been Modern 10). The emancipatory task was political: to end exploitation of humans by humans. The task of domination was technoscientific: to become masters of nature.

“The fabric of our collectives has had to be radically transformed to absorb the citizen of the 18th century and the worker of the 19th century. We need a similar transformation now to make space for non-humans created by sciences and techniques.” -Latour (We Have Never Been Modern 185-6).

Latour’s Gifford lectures on Gaia invite us to transform our imagination of the earth as modern globe by turning it inside out, such that we come to see that we are in a crucial sense surrounded by the earth, we are enclosed within it, trapped, earthbound. We cannot escape to a beyond, Musk and Bezos’ extra-terrestrial utopianism notwithstanding.

How are we to think human freedom and human-earth relations after modernity? Humans are not as free and teleological as moderns have imagined; nor is nature as dumb and deterministic as moderns have imagined. Marx says that what distinguishes the worst human architect from the best honey bee is that the former designs his building ideally before constructing it materially. Man has a plan. Bees, apparently, are simply automatons obeying blind instinct. But is this really how human creativity works? Is this really how bee creativity works? Architect Christopher Alexander discusses how medieval cathedrals were generated over generations in a purposeful but not centrally planned way. This is akin to the way insects build their nests, following a simple organizational patterning language out of which emerges enduring forms of order and beauty. Buildings that are designed and built in the way Marx imagined tend to be dead structures meant for money-making rather than living. Consciousness of the power of ideas does not mean mastery over ideas. Ideas possess us, purpose us; we participate in their power, co-workers and not free inventors.

Donna Haraway: “in so far as the Capitalocene is told in the idiom of fundamentalist Marxism, with all its trappings of Modernity, Progress, and History, that term is subject to the same or fiercer criticisms. The stories of both the Anthropocene and the Capitalocene teeter constantly on the brink of becoming much Too Big. Marx did better than that, as did Darwin. We can inherit their bravery and capacity to tell big-enough stories without determinism, teleology, and plan” (Staying With the Trouble, 50).

What does Haraway propose we do instead? In place of deterministic teleology, she proposes process-relational creativity; and in place of a Big Plan from on high she proposes playful communal kin-making with the ecological beings we breath, kill, eat, love, and otherwise communicate with on the daily down here on planet Earth. She credits James Clifford (Return) with the notion of a “big enough” story, a story that remains “ontologically unfinished” and situated in zones of contact, struggle, and dialogue” (Return 85-86).

How do we become sensitive to the values of nonhumans? We need new practices of aestheticization, new stories, new rituals (or perhaps we need to recover “old” practices, stories, and rituals) to help us become sensitive to the values of nonhumans. Indigenous peoples can help us develop these. I think something like this is going on even in major documentary films like the new Attenborough film “Our Planet” (problematic as its title is, and as Attenborough’s ecological politics are): e.g., the images of a mass suicide of walruses in northeastern Russia.

Becoming sensitive to the values of nonhumans doesn’t mean we don’t still have a hierarchy of values that in many cases puts humans at the top. As Whitehead says, “life is robbery.” But, he continues, “the robber needs justification.” What is the human, anyway? Are we one species among many? In an obvious sense, of course we are; and we ignore our dependence upon and embeddedness within wider ecological networks to our own peril. In another sense, we are not just another species. We have become, for better or worse, a planetary presence, a geological force. How are we just justify our presence on Earth? What does ecological justice look like when the idea of justice is expanded beyond just human society?

There are a number of ongoing polemics among anti-capitalist scholars, particularly metabolic rift theorists and world-ecology researchers (e.g., John Bellamy Foster and Jason Moore; incidentally, Foster seems to get Latour all wrong), regarding the proper way to understand the relation between human beings and the rest of the natural world. I would want to approach these disputes in a diplomatic manner. I am not here to choose sides, and anyway I don’t even know the whole story. But at this catastrophic moment in geohistory, those of us resisting the mitosis of capital might do well to focus less on widening abstract semantic divisions and more on imagining and materializing the shared future we hope we one day achieve on this Human-Earth.

Human history is a geophysical event. Whether we date the history of this event to the emergence of symbolic consciousness 200,000 years ago, the Neolithic revolution 12,500 years ago, the capitalist revolution 500 years ago, the industrial revolution 250 years ago, the nuclear age 75 years ago, or the information age 20 years ago, it is clear that the Earth has by now at least entered a new phase of geohistorical development.

AP headline on May 6th, 2019 reads “UN report: Humanity accelerating extinction of other species.” The first line reads: “People are putting nature in more trouble now than at any other time in human history, with extinction looming over 1 million species of plants and animals, scientists said Monday.”

NY Magazine headline also on May 6th, 2019 by Eric Levitz: “Humanity is About to Kill 1 Million Species in a Globe-Spanning Murder-Suicide.”

He concludes: “Earth’s ecosystems did not evolve to thrive amid the conditions that a global, advanced capitalist civilization of 7 billion humans has created. And that civilization did not evolve to thrive on a planet without coral reefs, wetlands, or wild bees — and with global temperatures exceeding preindustrial levels by 1.5 degrees. Bringing our civilization’s ambitions and modes of operation into better alignment with the environment’s demands no act of altruism. It merely requires recognizing our own collective long-term self-interest, and changing the way we grow food, produce energy, deal with climate change and dispose of waste, on a global level, through international cooperation.”

Whether we call it the Anthropocene, the Capitalocene, the Plantationocene, the Chthulucene, the Entropocene, or the Ecozoic, diagnosing the metaphysical roots of the present ecological catastrophe is a necessary (though not sufficient) part of imagining and materializing a post-capitalist world.

Marx is not unaware of our dependence upon the natural world, writing that: “Nature is man’s inorganic body, that is to say, nature in so far as it is not the human body. Man lives from nature . . . and he must maintain a continuing dialogue with it if he is not to die. To say that man’s physical and mental life is linked to nature simply means that nature is linked to itself, for man is a part of nature.”

Marx also writes in Capital of labor as a process “by which man, through his own actions, mediates, regulates, and controls the metabolism between himself and nature. He confronts the materials of nature as a force of nature” (https://isreview.org/issue/109/marx-and-nature).

Marx is dialectical in his understanding of the human-earth relation, but he still treats nature as dead and awaiting the value-creating power of human consciousness.

With Whitehead, I have argued that value is not just a human social construct or free creation of human labor or desire (modern thinkers as diverse as Locke, Marx, and Hayek agree on this, as I noted above) but a cosmological or ecological power from which our human values, and our human power, derive.

Citations for the above:

  • Dialogues of Alfred North Whitehead by Lucien Price, p. 220.

 * * * * * * *

Thursday, May 30th

Notes on Jason Moore’s opening talk

  • The planetary era began in 1492 (“the globe”) not in 1968 with earthrise photo
  • the end of the world has already happened, many times.
  • Man and Nature as “real abstractions” (non-European people and European women were considered part of nature); we must break down CP Snow’s two cultures, beyond “coupled systems” analysis, to a “flow fo flows” that integrates humans as earthlings
  • “civilization” as a dangerous, colonial word? What is this term meant to denote? The opposite of savagery and barbarism?
  • climate change as a “capitalogenic process” (what about Soviet and Chinese communist contributions?)
  • “Nature is a class struggle” – “Nature” is part of the capitalist project
  • we need more Marxist histories of climate change to avoid ceding the ground to neo-Malthusians
  • the Earth has always been a historical actor; the present ecological crisis is not novel in this respect (see William Connolly’s “Facing the Planetary” and “The Fragility of Things”)
  • climate is not exogenous to civilization and modes of production.
  • Marx on labor as metabolic mediation between man and nature (man transforms nature, nature transforms man).
  • from geology and history to geohistory
  • Capitalism emerged out of late 15th century geographic expansion; credit, conquest, and coerced labor were essential (“capitalism’s triple helix in formation”)
  • new world genocide led to regrowth of managed forests and CO2 dip, which led to little ice age; why didn’t this produce a terminal crisis in capitalism? Because of slavery frontier
  • why is cotton gin not considered as important as steam engine as impetus for industrial revolution?
  • “blue marble” photo of earth as “environmentalism of the rich”
  • Marx acknowledged that human labor is itself a force of nature (?)
  • alternative to collapse narrative (Jared Diamond)?


#WorldecologySF 2019 04
Jason Moore Climate of Crisis, 379 2019 a
May 31, 2019



#WorldecologySF 2019 04
Jason Moore Climate of Crisis, 379 2019 b
May 31, 2019