Quotes & Sayings


We, and creation itself, actualize the possibilities of the God who sustains the world, towards becoming in the world in a fuller, more deeper way. - R.E. Slater

There is urgency in coming to see the world as a web of interrelated processes of which we are integral parts, so that all of our choices and actions have [consequential effects upon] the world around us. - Process Metaphysician Alfred North Whitehead

Kurt Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem says (i) all closed systems are unprovable within themselves and, that (ii) all open systems are rightly understood as incomplete. - R.E. Slater

The most true thing about you is what God has said to you in Christ, "You are My Beloved." - Tripp Fuller

The God among us is the God who refuses to be God without us, so great is God's Love. - Tripp Fuller

According to some Christian outlooks we were made for another world. Perhaps, rather, we were made for this world to recreate, reclaim, redeem, and renew unto God's future aspiration by the power of His Spirit. - R.E. Slater

Our eschatological ethos is to love. To stand with those who are oppressed. To stand against those who are oppressing. It is that simple. Love is our only calling and Christian Hope. - R.E. Slater

Secularization theory has been massively falsified. We don't live in an age of secularity. We live in an age of explosive, pervasive religiosity... an age of religious pluralism. - Peter L. Berger

Exploring the edge of life and faith in a post-everything world. - Todd Littleton

I don't need another reason to believe, your love is all around for me to see. – Anon

Thou art our need; and in giving us more of thyself thou givest us all. - Khalil Gibran, Prayer XXIII

Be careful what you pretend to be. You become what you pretend to be. - Kurt Vonnegut

Religious beliefs, far from being primary, are often shaped and adjusted by our social goals. - Jim Forest

We become who we are by what we believe and can justify. - R.E. Slater

People, even more than things, need to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed, and redeemed; never throw out anyone. – Anon

Certainly, God's love has made fools of us all. - R.E. Slater

An apocalyptic Christian faith doesn't wait for Jesus to come, but for Jesus to become in our midst. - R.E. Slater

Christian belief in God begins with the cross and resurrection of Jesus, not with rational apologetics. - Eberhard Jüngel, Jürgen Moltmann

Our knowledge of God is through the 'I-Thou' encounter, not in finding God at the end of a syllogism or argument. There is a grave danger in any Christian treatment of God as an object. The God of Jesus Christ and Scripture is irreducibly subject and never made as an object, a force, a power, or a principle that can be manipulated. - Emil Brunner

“Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh” means "I will be that who I have yet to become." - God (Ex 3.14) or, conversely, “I AM who I AM Becoming.”

Our job is to love others without stopping to inquire whether or not they are worthy. - Thomas Merton

The church is God's world-changing social experiment of bringing unlikes and differents to the Eucharist/Communion table to share life with one another as a new kind of family. When this happens, we show to the world what love, justice, peace, reconciliation, and life together is designed by God to be. The church is God's show-and-tell for the world to see how God wants us to live as a blended, global, polypluralistic family united with one will, by one Lord, and baptized by one Spirit. – Anon

The cross that is planted at the heart of the history of the world cannot be uprooted. - Jacques Ellul

The Unity in whose loving presence the universe unfolds is inside each person as a call to welcome the stranger, protect animals and the earth, respect the dignity of each person, think new thoughts, and help bring about ecological civilizations. - John Cobb & Farhan A. Shah

If you board the wrong train it is of no use running along the corridors of the train in the other direction. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

God's justice is restorative rather than punitive; His discipline is merciful rather than punishing; His power is made perfect in weakness; and His grace is sufficient for all. – Anon

Our little [biblical] systems have their day; they have their day and cease to be. They are but broken lights of Thee, and Thou, O God art more than they. - Alfred Lord Tennyson

We can’t control God; God is uncontrollable. God can’t control us; God’s love is uncontrolling! - Thomas Jay Oord

Life in perspective but always in process... as we are relational beings in process to one another, so life events are in process in relation to each event... as God is to Self, is to world, is to us... like Father, like sons and daughters, like events... life in process yet always in perspective. - R.E. Slater

To promote societal transition to sustainable ways of living and a global society founded on a shared ethical framework which includes respect and care for the community of life, ecological integrity, universal human rights, respect for diversity, economic justice, democracy, and a culture of peace. - The Earth Charter Mission Statement

Christian humanism is the belief that human freedom, individual conscience, and unencumbered rational inquiry are compatible with the practice of Christianity or even intrinsic in its doctrine. It represents a philosophical union of Christian faith and classical humanist principles. - Scott Postma

It is never wise to have a self-appointed religious institution determine a nation's moral code. The opportunities for moral compromise and failure are high; the moral codes and creeds assuredly racist, discriminatory, or subjectively and religiously defined; and the pronouncement of inhumanitarian political objectives quite predictable. - R.E. Slater

God's love must both center and define the Christian faith and all religious or human faiths seeking human and ecological balance in worlds of subtraction, harm, tragedy, and evil. - R.E. Slater

In Whitehead’s process ontology, we can think of the experiential ground of reality as an eternal pulse whereby what is objectively public in one moment becomes subjectively prehended in the next, and whereby the subject that emerges from its feelings then perishes into public expression as an object (or “superject”) aiming for novelty. There is a rhythm of Being between object and subject, not an ontological division. This rhythm powers the creative growth of the universe from one occasion of experience to the next. This is the Whiteheadian mantra: “The many become one and are increased by one.” - Matthew Segall

Without Love there is no Truth. And True Truth is always Loving. There is no dichotomy between these terms but only seamless integration. This is the premier centering focus of a Processual Theology of Love. - R.E. Slater

-----

Note: Generally I do not respond to commentary. I may read the comments but wish to reserve my time to write (or write from the comments I read). Instead, I'd like to see our community help one another and in the helping encourage and exhort each of us towards Christian love in Christ Jesus our Lord and Savior. - re slater

Showing posts with label Loving the Unloved - Rights & Refuge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Loving the Unloved - Rights & Refuge. Show all posts

Saturday, February 6, 2021

What To Do About Lent? Part 1/2




Introduction

We're coming up to the season of Lent and so I thought I should post two articles on the Christian observation of it during this season of political unrest during the viral pandemic and its variants.

Lent follows the celebration of Christ's Advent (Christmas) and precedes the celebration of Christ's Death and Atoning Resurrection (Easter). It lasts 40 days commemorating Jesus' time in the wilderness before coming to the Cross. This first post asks the question, "What To Do About Lent?" In Part 2 we will deal more directly with the observance of Lent itself as a practice.

This first article will highlight the obtusiveness of American Christianity as it finds itself embroiled in American politics. This energy has placed parts of the Christian church in grave danger of losing its witness, if not its faith altogether. Young people are leaving the church in droves dismayed by the church's unloving words and deeds spoken into the oppressed other.

Who? The borderwall immigrants being ripped apart from their children. The refugees seeking assylum from harm. Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, even Asians, because of the viral pandemic gripping the world. Not to mention lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgenders, and the queers of society (LGBTQ). Then their are the impoverished, the invisible families on the street, and on and on it goes of unjust American oppression acting against the unwanted other. Jesus said to see the other, hear the other, love the other, and minister to the other. Not to oppress the other, harm the other, chain the other, hate the other. This is not Christianity. But it is what Christianity has become.

The church then has placed itself in the position of condemning society all around itself. Seeing the sin in other lives rather than the plank in its own eye. While then having the audacity to proclaim itself holy by hosting DC Rallies in the Fall of 2020 where it repents of nothing but steels itself to launch sessionist attacks on America's democracy and Americans in general. The sin of oppression lies in the church of oppression and not in the unloved other whom it hates but God loves. Whom Jeshua has come to save. Let repentance first begin in the House of the Lord before casting aspersions upon the unapproved other whom the church would deem sinner but whom God deems loved. Thus saith the Lord.

Politics has done the church no favors. Never has. Never will. So how, during this season of Lent, will the church respond to her God? Will it repent and return to the work of ministry of the annunciation of Christ the Lover and Redeemer of our souls? Or will it continue down the path of unholiness leaning unto uncivil democracy and oppression, if not outright neo-facism, all for the prize of obtaining and holding unholy power?

Here then is my first post - "What To Do About Lent?" Part 1/2. Part 2 will deal more directly with the observance itself. But here, I feel the burden of the shallowness of observing Lent without saying something first about the church which is participating in it without qualm or uneasiness over its social and political actions.

My guide in this would be the German scholar, theologian, and pastor, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, in his actions against the German church as it plummeted into Nazism. He spoke against its oppression of the Jews, gypsies, and foreigner in its lands. And as he worked against a political philosophy of death and power even he himself became imprisoned and eventually hung for his anti-fascist beliefs. Let's pray that the Lord of the Harvest may come once again to save His lost people from greater harm than they already have done. Even as Jesus stood in the fires of humanity speaking love, hope, and healing actions, until his death by the hands of ungodly religious leaders.

R.E. Slater
February 6, 2021





Jeshua [N] [H] [S]

  • Head of the ninth priestly order ( Ezra 2:36 ); called also Jeshuah ( 1 Chronicles 24:11 ).

  • A Levite appointed by Hezekiah to distribute offerings in the priestly cities ( 2 Chronicles 31:15 ).

  • Ezra 2:6 ; Nehemiah 7:11 .

  • Ezra 2:40 ; Nehemiah 7:43 .

  • The son of Jozadak, and high priest of the Jews under Zerubbabel ( Nehemiah 7:7 ; Nehemiah 12:1 Nehemiah 12:7 Nehemiah 12:10 Nehemiah 12:26 ); called Joshua ( Haggai 1:1 Haggai 1:12 ; Haggai 2:2 Haggai 2:4 ; Zechariah 3:1 Zechariah 3:3 Zechariah 3:6 Zechariah 3:8 Zechariah 3:9 ).

  • A Levite ( Ezra 8:33 ).

  • Nehemiah 3:19 .

  • A Levite who assisted in the reformation under ( Nehemiah 8:7 ; Nehemiah 9:4 Nehemiah 9:5 ).

  • Son of Kadmiel ( Nehemiah 12:24 ).

  • A city of Judah ( Nehemiah 11:26 ).

  • Nehemiah 8:17 ; Joshua, the son of Nun.





  • (a saviour ), another form of the name of Joshua of Jesus.

    1. Joshua the son of Nun. ( Nehemiah 8:17 ) [JOSHUA]
    2. A priest in the reign of David, to whom the nine course fell by David, to whom the ninth course fell by lot. ( 1 Chronicles 24:11 ) (B.C. 1014.)
    3. One of the Levites in the reign of Hezekiah. ( 2 Chronicles 31:15 ) (B.C. 726.)
    4. Son of Jehozadak, first high priest after the Babylonish captivity, B.C. 536. Jeshua was probably born in Babylon, whither his father Jehozadak had been taken captive while young. ( 1 Chronicles 6:15 ) Authorized Version. He came up from Babylon in the first year of Cyrus, with Zerubbabel, and took a leading part with him in the rebuilding of the temple and the restoration of the Jewish commonwealth. The two prophecies concerning him in ( Zechariah 3:1 ) ... and Zech 6:9-15 point him out as an eminent type of Christ.
    5. Head of a Levitical house, one of those which returned from the Babylonish captivity. ( Ezra 2:40 ; 3:9 ; Nehemiah 3:19 ; 8:7 ; Nehemiah 9:4 Nehemiah 9:5 ; 12:8 ) etc.
    6. A branch of the family of Pahath-moab, one of the chief families, probably, of the tribe of Judah. ( Nehemiah 10:14 ; 7:11 ) etc.; Ezra 10:30





    JESHUA

    jesh'-u-a, je-shu'-a (yeshua`):

    A place occupied by the children of Judah after their return from captivity (Nehemiah 11:26), evidently, from the places named with it, in the extreme South of Judah. It may correspond with the Shema of Joshua 15:26, and possibly to the Sheba of 19:2. The site may be Khirbet Sa`weh, a ruin upon a prominent hill, Tell es Sa`weh, 12 miles East-Northeast of Beersheba. The hill is surrounded by a wall of large blocks of stone. PEF, III, 409-10, Sh XXV.





    Meaning
    Salvation, Saved
    Etymology
    From the verb ישע (yasha'), to save.

    The name Jeshua in the Bible

    The name Jeshua is a shortened form of the name Joshua (יהושע) and this shortened form Jeshua occurs in the later Scriptures (see Nehemiah 8:17 for a Jeshua the son of Nun, who is doubtlessly Joshua the successor of Moses — Numbers 13:16).

    Other men named Jeshua are (and the following probably overlap a bit):

    • Levite who dealt with voluntary offerings (2 Chronicles 31:15).
    • A leader among the returnees under Zerubbabel (Ezra 2:6).
    • A leader of a priestly clan (Ezra 2:36).
    • The father of one of the wall's repairers (Nehemiah 3:19).
    • One of the first rabbis installed by Ezra (Nehemiah 8:7).
    • Then there is a high priest named Jeshua who is mentioned by Ezra (2:2) and Zechariah (3:1) and Haggai who names him Joshua (1:1). Nehemiah mentions this Jeshua among the kohanim who return with Zerubbabel (Nehemiah 12:1). This Jeshua is a bit mysterious because although he's fit to travel, he is father of Joiakim, grandfather of Eliashib, great-grandfather of Joiada, great-great-grandfather of Jonathan, and great-great-great-grandfather of Jaddua (12:10-11). But it seems likely that this Jeshua was still alive because only Jeshua (son of Azaniah) is mentioned among the signers of the sealed document, and one would certainly expect a high priest on that list.
    • And finally, there is also a town in Judah named Jeshua, which is mentioned in Nehemiah 11:26.

    Etymology of the name Jeshua

    The name Jeshua comes from the word group that starts with the verb ישע (yasha'), meaning to save or deliver:

    Excerpted from: Abarim Publications' Biblical Dictionary
    שוע  ישע

    The verb ישע (yasha') means to be unrestricted and thus to be free and thus to be saved (from restriction, from oppression and thus from ultimate demise). A doer of this verb is a savior. Nouns ישועה (yeshua), ישע (yesha') and תשועה (teshua) mean salvation. Adjective שוע (shoa') means (financially) independent, freed in an economic sense.

    Verb שוע (shawa') means to cry out (for salvation). Nouns שוע (shua'), שוע (shoa') and שועה (shawa) mean a cry (for salvation).





    God and Power

    So what do you think of when you think of the God of Love? Do you think of:
    • Intimidating power? Such as Judgment or Hell?
    • Self-righteousness? Such as condemnation and hate?
    • Sanctimonious hypocrisy? Such as exhibited by a Holy One doing the opposite of Holiness?
    • Or outright greed, hatred and blood-spilling, with which the church has weighed Jesus down with?
    No, neither do I. So why is today's church involved with these evils and supporting unholy men and women who daily commit them?

    I don't really know either. But I think Christians should stop. And stop confusing good civil democracy with their cherished totalitarian theocracy. America doesn't lift up kings here, but it does lift up people of all kinds as a melting pot of hope and responsible freedom.

    A loving God loves all the time. In this life and the next. Remember, it is our sin which condemns us... not a loving God. A God who would heal us... not condemn us. Too many have confused God with sin, and sin with judgment. The two ideas have been intimated wrongly of each other by confusing essence with outcome.

    A loving God saves and does not condemn. Surely He judges in terms of failure and wrong. But it is our sin which judges and condemns our actions to death and hell. A God of life and love can do neither. It would go against His essence. God is Jeshua, Savior. He is Life and Light. But the outcomes are upon us and the misuse of our freedom to hate and do evil. Hell is that place which flees from God, whether in this life or the next. Many a Christian is fleeing from God just like the irreligious and unfaithful. One doesn't have to be dead to be living in hell.

    A Kingdom on Earth?

    I earlier mentioned a totalitarian theocracy (or kingdom) which today's New Testament Church yearns for by seating Christ upon the throne of rulership. However, in theocratic terms, or kingdom terms, this is not how democracies work. They are opposed to kings and rule by fiat. Democracies more or less observe the idea of the God who shares power. Democracies lead through service. By lifting up the weak and powerless over the strong and willful. Democracies follow in the image and likeness of Christ rather than the Old Testament ideals of benevolent kings and despots which are fundamentally at odds as oxymorons to the rule of power itself.

    Further, a good civil democracy rejects an Old Testament theocracy permitting stoning, racial hatred, legalism, genocide, discrimination, religious bigotry, murder, etc and etc. God was a God of love then even as He is now. This hasn't changed. Further, Israel's theocratic leadership, whether vested in its priests or kings, was no different then its people. Most were as corrupt then as the church's leadership is deficit today. A godly leader, either then or now, is a man or woman who admits their weakness, seeks God to overcome their failings, is humble, modest, and leads by example by work and by deed. When leaders do such practices they stand out. Consider Moses, Joshua, David, or any one of the Apostles. Leaders lead by example.

    What About Theocratic Living?

    Back in the "good old days" of the Old Testament under the Mosaic Covenant established by God through Moses at Mt. Sinai, the Ten Commandments stated what love wasn't. Which is curious, isn't it? Think about it.... Since when is Love ever expressed in the not doing of something? Yeah, verily, Love is always expressed in the doing. Not in the not doing. As example, if one doesn't dishonor their parents one still may not love them. But if one loves their parents they would not dishonor them intentionally. Understand?

    So too with a good civil democracy which has its laws but underneath those laws is the commitment to treat one's fellow neighbor well and with intentional goodness. By this arrangement, both it's democratically elected laws and it's civic duty upheld the other in responsible accountability. And by these Americans are to stand against lies, duplicity, double-dealing, hypocrisy, and sedition against the nation. Americans work their disagreements out with one another through civil institutions. Not by slandering one another, seeking to overthrow their government, or suppressing rightful votes. So let's say it again... the season of Lent is a season of introspection, repentance, and commitment to love God and neighbor.

    Why then do you think Jesus was so angered by the scribes and the pharisees? By Israel's religious leadership? Because her Jewish priests and leaders had taken God's love and made it an evil thing. Even as today's church leaders are actively commiting in their political activism by choosing for racial bondage, discriminating oppression, opposing social justice, illegal anti-democratic reforms, denial of interfaith ministries and reformatory societal norms.

    Yeshua, Jehovah, Yahveh, Adoni, YHWH, are names of the God who is Love. We, as God's children, are to learn to love. To learn to bring God's love into societal civics and political public forums. We do not stand on the outside of civil institutions throwing rocks from platforms of denial and borderland beliefs. We must learn to listen, speak truth and not lies, and be at peace with one another. The evil which Christians are doing are but a litany to the list we started with in this post.

    Therefore my brothers and sisters, Refuse evil. Do good. Love your democracy and make it better, not worse. Let the season of Lent begin a season of personal and political churchly repentance. A repentance which unmasks false Christian leaders from the power and privilege they lust. And from the earthly oppressions they seek by harm and destruction upon fellow human beings they have declared unholy and uncircumscribed, lest they place Jesus and His Church again upon the altars of evil and crosses of death. Amen.

    R.E. Slater
    February 6, 2021

    Sunday, May 7, 2017

    Did Jesus Break the Torah? Yes, In Fact, He Encouraged Others To Do So Too!



    Introduction

    Let's start with the basics... Jesus and Christianized laws made religious don't mix when humanity is lost in the equation. Grace and Mercy triumphs over inhumanitarian laws every time!

    This Jesus-principal applies to how we conduct trade and business with one another; write and enact laws; teach and educate our children; worship, pray, and communicate with one another.

    There is no substitute for love if love is the very thing being disregarded for profit, for money, for power, for prestige, or for any other idol in our lives.

    R.E. Slater
    May 7, 2017






    Jesus and Torah
    http://subversive1.blogspot.com/2016/05/jesus-and-torah.html?spref=tw

    Does Jesus break the Torah? Does He encourage others to do so? Here, in this guest post, my friend Chuck McKnight makes some very insightful observations which I believe are on the right track.

    Keith Giles

    ---

    Jesus and Torah
    Guest post by Chuck McKnight
    May 6, 2017

    I made this list a while ago of just a few examples where Jesus deliberately breaks Torah. Take it or leave it.


    Oath Taking

    According to Torah, the Israelites were commanded by Yahweh to swear in his name.

    "You shall fear the Lord your God and serve Him, and shall take oaths in His name." - Deuteronomy 6:13

    Jesus not only contradicted this command, he said that it came from the evil one, which certainly means that it did not come from Yahweh

    But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the evil one." - Matthew 5:37

    Showing Mercy over Retribution

    According to Torah, "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" was an absolute mandate. The Israelites were commanded to "show no mercy" in carrying it out:

    "Show no pity: life shall be for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot." - Deuteronomy 19:21

    But Jesus directly contradicted this mandate, commanding his followers not to follow Torah's instructions:

    “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also." - Matthew 5:38–39


    Showing Forgiveness to Adulterers

    According to Torah, adultery was to be punished with death. No exceptions were given.

    ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death." - Leviticus 20:10

    But Jesus broke Torah in order to show mercy to the woman caught in adultery. [See John 8]


    Offering Help Even on the Sabbath

    According to Torah, no work was to be done on the Sabbath.

    "But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns, so that your male and female servants may rest, as you do." - Deuteronomy 5:14

    But Jesus flaunted his disregard for this particular command on many occasions. Let's look at one of the most direct violations:

    When Jesus healed the man by the pool of Bethesda, he not only did so on the Sabbath, but he specifically instructed the man to break the Sabbath with him by carrying his mat.
    "Then Jesus said to him, “Get up! Pick up your mat and walk.” At once the man was cured; he picked up his mat and walked. The day on which this took place was a Sabbath" - John 5:8–9

    This was nothing less than a deliberate contradiction of Jeremiah 17:21–22, which states that Yahweh specified not to carry any burden on the Sabbath. This command wasn't one of the traditions that had been built up as a hedge around the law; it came straight from Scripture.

    "This is what the Lord says: Be careful not to carry a load on the Sabbath day or bring it through the gates of Jerusalem. Do not bring a load out of your houses or do any work on the Sabbath, but keep the Sabbath day holy, as I commanded your ancestors." - Jeremiah 17:21-22

    If Jesus was merely concerned with healing the man, he would have simply done so, but he went out of his way to go against the law in the process, [by asking the man to take up his mat and carry it] and that action was what specifically raised the ire of the Jews:

    "...and so the Jewish leaders said to the man who had been healed, “It is the Sabbath; the law forbids you to carry your mat.” - John 5:10

    How Jesus is Superior to Man's Laws

    So, what are we to make of this? I [Keith] have a few thoughts:

    First, Jesus himself was the first one to point out the differences between the Old and the New Covenant realities: "You've heard it said....[quoting Moses and the Old Covenant]...but I say to you...[speaking a new way of living under the New Covenant]."

    Second, the New Testament writers document these two realities and wrestle sometimes with the ways that the New replaces and modifies the Old in the book of Acts, and in Galatians and Romans, for example.

    Third, Jesus is the clearest picture we have of who the Father is, and what the Father is like. The prophets were men like us, but Jesus was, and is, the Word of God made flesh. He is God the Son. So whenever there are apparent contradictions, we take Jesus and apply what He says, not what those ancient prophets said through a veil that [can] only removed by Christ.

    Finally, Christians are never instructed to keep the Torah or the Law. So it doesn't really matter if Jesus and the Torah are in conflict. We follow Jesus, not the Torah. Christianity is not Judaism with a cross on top. It's based on Jesus and who He is and what He commanded us to do. 

    The Old Covenant is "obsolete". [Heb. 8:13]

    It is "fading away and vanishing". [2 Cor. 3:7-11]

    We should "get rid of it" [Gal.4:30]

    Jesus is "the end of the Law" [Rom.10:4]

    I'm very thankful to Chuck McKnight for taking the time to identify the specific ways in which Jesus opposed the Torah and corrected it for us.

    We are no longer under the Old Covenant. We are gloriously alive in the New Covenant reality that the prophets longed to see.

    God Himself, and Jesus, His Son, has made a home within us. We are now called His children. We are His beloved.

    - kg

    For Further Reading


    Amazon Link


    Early Biblical Interpretation (Library of Early Christianity) Paperback – January 1, 1986, by James L. Kugel (Author), Rowan A. Greer (Author)

    This highly accessible book discusses how the early Jewish and Christian communities went about interpreting Scripture.

    The Library of Early Christianity is a series of eight outstanding books exploring the Jewish and Greco-Roman contexts in which the New Testament developed.

    Editorial Reviews

    From Library Journal

    The initial volumes of this new series bring refreshing critical perspectives to the question of early Christian identity. Grant argues that the religious activity of the New Testament must be placed within the matrix of the Greco-Roman experience. After exploring the functions, deeds, and doctrines of the pagan gods, he clearly points out the extent to which the development of Christologies and the doctrine of the Trinity are indebted to pagan expression and reflection. Distilling recent social/historical analyses, Stambaugh and Balch review the history of the period in which Christianity arose and spreadrelevant rural and urban environments and their common economic patterns and assumptions. Chapters on mission and Christian adaptation of urban social forms are major contributions. Kugel and Greer explore the major factors that shaped scriptural interpretation within early Judaism and Christianity. Kugel shows how, when the Jewish past turned into a present problematic than scriptural interpretation became a religious activity. Refining past tendencies and presaging future doctrinal debates, Greer demonstrates the notion of a Christian Bible on Irenaeus's synthesis. For university and seminary collections. Arthur J. Dewey, Xavier Univ., Cincinnati.

    Copyright 1986 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.


    About the Author

    James A. Kugel is Director of the Institute for the History of the Jewish Bible at Bar Ilan University in Israel

    Rowan A. Greer is Professor Emeritus of Anglican Studies at Yale Divinity School in New Haven, Connecticut. A highly recognized scholar with specializations in both the New Testament and the early church, he is the author of seven books and numerous articles.


    Tuesday, May 2, 2017

    David Congdon - No, The American Church is Not in Exile



    No, The American Church is Not in Exile
    https://sojo.net/articles/no-american-church-isn-t-exile

    April 19, 2017

    In the wake of the Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing same-sex marriage, conservative Christian leaders sounded a dire word: Christians are no longer at home in the United States.

    Rod Dreher, a senior editor at The American Conservative, wrote an article for TIME following the decision with the headline, “Orthodox Christians Must Now Learn To Live as Exiles in Our Own Country.” In his long-anticipated book, The Benedict Option, Dreher tells Christians to “embrace exile.” He alludes to the oft-used Jeremiah 29:7 in his conclusion when he says that “though in exile, we work for the peace of the city.” In a response to Jacob Lupfer, who penned an essay saying Dreher suffers from a “delusional persecution complex,” Dreher claims that Christians are “called by God to be faithfully present here in Babylon ... like Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego.”

    In a similar vein, Russell Moore, the president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, published a response to the Supreme Court decision in the Washington Post that concluded by calling Christians to “joyfully march to Zion” as “strangers and exiles in American culture.”

    Moore is drawing here on the language of Hebrews 11, which describes believers as “strangers and exiles on the earth” (Heb 11:13, ESV). The idea of the follower of God as an exile has deep roots in the faith, originating in Israel’s history of exile in Assyria and Babylon.

    But instead of “exiles on the earth,” Moore writes “exiles in American culture.” And Dreher speaks of being “exiles in our own country.” Everything hangs on this change.


    Why Exile?

    The idea of the church in exile is once again popular in American Christian circles. Missiologist Michael Frost wrote Exiles: Living Missionally in a Post-Christian Culture in 2006. In 2008, before his own exile from the evangelical community, Rob Bell coauthored Jesus Wants to Save Christians: A Manifesto for the Church in Exile. New Testament professor James Thompson wrote The Church in Exile: God’s Counterculture in a Non-Christian World in 2011. And in 2015, Lee Beach of McMaster Divinity College published The Church in Exile: Living in Hope After Christendom.

    Why the attraction to exile? For many of those in the missional church movement, exile language offers an alternative to the “culture war” rhetoric of the religious right. Instead of a church at war with surrounding culture, a church in exile presents a vision of God’s people living peacefully within foreign territory.

    Seeking the welfare of a foreign city (Jeremiah 29:7) is certainly an improvement over waging constant battle against it. But what does the idea of exile imply about the church? And is it consistent with Christian faith?

    Exile means that one is barred from one’s native land. The people of Israel, for instance, were prevented from living in the land promised to them by God. Followers of Jesus, however, have no native land. The Great Commission at the end of Matthew finds Jesus telling his followers to “make disciples of all nations” (Matt 28:19). In the Acts of the Apostles, Jesus tells them “you will be my witnesses ... to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8).


    If the message of Christian faith is for all peoples and nations, then how can the New Testament writers speak of believers as exiles? The answer is that, for Christianity, the whole earth is a foreign land.

    In the Gospel of John, Jesus prays: “I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they do not belong to the world, just as I do not belong to the world” (John 17:14). If the world is a foreign land, then the church is by definition in exile. But so the adage: If everything is exile, nothing is exile. Because the whole world is alien territory, no culture has a privileged position in relationship to God. Every culture is equally close and equally distant from the new creation. For those who follow Jesus, every person is a neighbor and every place is a home.

    Talking about the church in exile is redundant, unless there is a change in the definition.


    Exile and Christendom

    Notice the book titles mentioned above. They describe the church in exile within “a post-Christian culture,” “a non-Christian world,” and a society “after Christendom.”

    To be sure, many of these authors would view the experience of exile as a good thing. They do not necessarily think “Christendom” was a golden age to which we ought to return — and yet the decision to define the church as exilic allows Christendom to set the terms for the conversation.

    Speaking of the church in exile within American culture suggests there is some ideal culture — according to Dreher, “the Judeo-Christian culture of the West” — in which the church would not be in exile. Once we make that move, we have abandoned the early church’s insight that the church is exiled from every culture.

    We end up pining for the Christendom of earlier history, when in fact the only true Christian world exists beyond the end of history.

    But the problem goes deeper. Thinking of the church as exiled from a particular culture further implies the church has its own. Dreher compares the evangelical church to the monastic communities of St. Benedict, while Moore views the church as a new Israel marching to Zion. This idea of church as a specific culture has implications for mission. Moore makes this explicit when he calls American culture “our mission field."

    Imperialism or Separatism — or Something Else?

    There are only two options at this point: Either the church spreads its culture to others or it assimilates its own into distinct community. The former is the way of imperialism, while the latter is the way of separatism.

    Israel’s mission is of the separatist variety, as defined especially by the book of Deuteronomy, whose message can be summarized as a warning to Israel to remain distinct from the other nations. The prophetic tradition interprets the Babylonian exile as God’s judgment on Israel’s failure to remain separate from other cultures.

    Yet the overall message of the New Testament, especially the book of Acts, is that the church is not a separate community with its own culture. The power of Christianity is found in what scholars of mission call its capacity for contextualization, which means that the message of Christ can be translated into different languages, cultures, and contexts.


    According to Lamin Sanneh, the Gambian missiologist and professor at Yale Divinity School, the Gospel comes “without a revealed language or a founding original culture,” and therefore “all cultural forms ... are in principle worthy of bearing the truth of Christianity.”

    Christians today who adopt an exilic identity have abandoned this dimension of Christianity. They are giving up on the contextualization principle. For them, contemporary American culture is enemy territory, and the only recourse is to retreat into a separate cultural community.


    This does not mean, of course, that a church contextualized within the United States would uncritically affirm the culture. But it does mean we need to consider more thoughtfully what exactly constitutes the truth of Christianity and how this truth might relate to its given context.

    Returning Home After Exile

    The Barna Group’s “Faith That Lasts” project, conducted over five years between 2007 and 2011, revealed that nearly a quarter of 18- to 29-year-olds (23 percent) said that “Christians demonize everything outside of the church” was a statement that “completely” or “mostly” described their experience.

    Christians have largely left behind the days when their faith was defined by prohibitions against drinking, dancing, and movies. But the exile mentality remains: Today, Christian culture may be more ideological than moral, the us-versus-them logic more pervasive and more subtle.

    The church communicates an exilic message when it speaks about the need to evangelize “the West” as if this need is greater now than in the past, when it associates “the world” specifically with American culture, or when it waxes longingly about how much better things were “back then” or are “over there.”


    The church needs to abandon talk of exile, and reclaim the possibility of being at home. Home is the cultural context within which the church already exists. Reclaiming home does not mean uncritically adopting whatever seems fashionable at the time. It means approaching cultural changes and developments with an attitude of openness and hospitality, with a readiness to embrace rather than exclude. Reclaiming home means obeying the biblical injunction to live wholly without fear or anxiety.

    Many Christians have already put down their weapons to fight the culture. It is time now to put down the walls of defense that keep them separated from the culture. Perhaps a future generation will yet say that “Christians love everything outside of the church.”

    ---


    David Congdon has a PhD in theology from Princeton Theological Seminary. He is the author of three books, including most recently The God Who Saves: A Dogmatic Sketch.




    Saturday, September 5, 2015

    Rebecca Trotter - The Genuis and Challenge of Christianity




    The Genuis and Challenge of Christianity
    http://theupsidedownworld.com/2014/04/02/the-genuis-and-challenge-of-christianity/

    by Rebecca Trotter
    April 24, 2014

    The genius of Christianity is that it demands you give mental agreement to all sorts of things you don’t actually agree with. Love your enemies. Every man is your neighbor. You’ll be judged by how well you showed love to the least attractive, least moral, least appealing, most repulsive people you meet. Don’t judge. All those beatitudes about the meek and the suffering and the pure of heart.

    We don’t believe any of that stuff. We say we do, but we don’t really. Yet if we want to call ourselves Christians, we must affirm that we agree with these teachings of Jesus. Which creates mental dissonance. How we handle this gap between what we actually believe and what we profess to believe determines how successful we can become as Christians.

    The typical way to handle cognitive dissonance is to go into denial. You continue following your gut level support of cultural norms and personal preference and just call that love. If the people you love complain that you’re actually hurting them, you dismiss it as their problem, their flaw or their lack of understanding. Some people are so committed to their denial, that they will devote a lot of time and energy to creating and promoting high-minded ideals about human nature, God’s ways and church philosophy all in service of ignoring and justifying the suffering of others.

    These people will often become very involved in tertiary issues which do not have a great deal of bearing on Jesus’ teachings. Maybe they attend a lot of church or go on missions trips or memorize and quote scripture a lot. Maybe they sign lots of petitions and pass on scary stories about bad people. Maybe the adopt a strict moral code that guides where they shop, what sort of entertainment they consume and where to draw the boundaries between themselves and others.

    Some people in ministry do almost nothing but help others find ways to think of themselves as Christians despite disagreeing with everything Jesus ever said.

    Except the part where Jesus got angry and turned over tables and when he told that skanky woman to stop sinning. Those are often beloved parts of Jesus’ story for a Christian in denial. Not for the meaning Jesus was conveying with them. Just because they already agree with being angry and confrontational and telling sinners to knock it off.

    It scares me to think of how many Christians go their whole lives practicing the faith this way. And I think it all comes from a fear of being wrong. We can’t admit we are wrong because we equate being wrong with being shamed. So we can go our whole lives, being wrong as wrong can be, and never really open ourselves up to learning all the mysteries contained in Jesus’ ridiculous, outrageous teachings. That none of us actually agree with.

    The way of the Christian is to avoid retreating into denial. We may know in our head, at some level, that what Jesus says is true. But in truth, what Jesus taught is the end goal of following him. When we have been trained and tested, we will see, understand and agree with Jesus’ teachings. But we have to be trained and tested before we can get to that point.

    If we are ever to be corrected, we must be willing to try, test and challenge Jesus’ teachings. Sometimes this starts by simply admitting, “this teaching is the most ridiculous, absurd, self-evidently wrong thing I’ve ever heard.” God already knows that’s what we think. He’s never been particularly impressed with our attempts at denying it. But he has shown himself more than willing to meet us right where we are. And he’s promised never to put us to shame. It’s perfectly fine to admit you don’t agree with him. Just follow up, like a man once did with Jesus, “I believe, please help me with my unbelief”.