Process Neurology: Brain, Spirit, and the Becoming of Mind

Process Neurology: Brain, Spirit,

and the Becoming of Mind

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT-5

“Behold, I make all things new.” - Revelation 21:5

---

Preface

For centuries, theologians and scientists have gazed at the mystery of the human mind from different vantage points — one calling it soul, the other consciousness. Yet both have sought to understand how we change, grow, and become. Modern neuroscience presently reveals that the brain is not static: it reshapes and renews itself throughout our lifetime. No less a subject than theology also speaks of renewal, transformation, and rebirth.

This essay brings these two perspectives into conversation through process theology — a framework where reality itself is understood as creative, relational, and ever-becoming. Within this lens, neuroplasticity becomes the science of adaptive transformation, and neurogenesis becomes the biology of divine creativity. Together, they express what Alfred North Whitehead called the creative advance into novelty: God and the world in perpetual co-creation.

The brain, like Scripture, is alive. It rewires through experience, regenerates through creativity, and participates in an ongoing dialogue between the past that shapes it and the future that calls it forth. This is not only neuroscience — it is theology in motion.

---

Introduction

The human brain’s ability to change itself — to reconfigure its structure and function through experience — lies at the heart of both learning and healing. Scientists call this neuroplasticity. Equally remarkable is the discovery of neurogenesis, the brain’s capacity to generate new neurons even in adulthood, primarily in the hippocampus. These two processes show that the brain is a living, creative system capable of self-renewal.

In process thought, all reality behaves similarly: each moment of existence integrates the past and advances toward novelty. Whitehead’s metaphysics speaks of concrescence — the integration of experience — and creativity, the principle of new emergence. The brain therefore becomes a microcosm of process philosophy itself: a field of becoming, where adaptation and innovation interweave in dynamic balance.

Theological language echoes this truth. The biblical call to “renew the mind” (Romans 12:2), to “put on the new self” (Ephesians 4:24), and to be “a new creation” (2 Corinthians 5:17) describes precisely this process of transformation. The Spirit’s work is not static or miraculous in isolation; it is participatory, embodied, and continuous.

This essay explores how neuroplasticity and neurogenesis together express the processual nature of divine creativity, how they parallel spiritual transformation, and how a process-informed reading of Scripture — a processual bibliology — can reveal the ongoing dialogue between brain, Spirit, and world.

---

Section I: Neuroplasticity and Neurogenesis

1. Neuroplasticity — The Brain’s Adaptive Power

Neuroplasticity is the brain’s ability to reorganize its connections in response to experience, learning, and environment. It manifests through:

• Synaptic plasticity — strengthening or weakening of existing connections.

• Functional plasticity — shifting of functions from damaged to healthy regions.

• Structural plasticity — formation or pruning of new synaptic pathways.

In psychological terms, this is how we learn, heal, and adapt. In theological terms, it parallels metanoia — repentance and transformation. Every new experience becomes a potential site of renewal. The brain, like the soul, is capable of change without losing its identity.

---

2. Neurogenesis — The Birth of New Neurons

Neurogenesis refers to the creation of new neurons from stem cells, particularly within the hippocampus. These neurons migrate, integrate, and become functional, offering new potential for memory, emotion, and creativity.

Where neuroplasticity modifies what already exists, neurogenesis introduces something entirely new. It is the biological mirror of God’s creative act — the “I am doing a new thing” of Isaiah 43:19 — a continual emergence of novelty within a living system.

Together, neuroplasticity and neurogenesis express a profound balance: the brain as both conservator and creator, preserving coherence while inviting innovation.

---

3. Comparison: Neuroplasticity vs Neurogenesis

Feature	Neuroplasticity	Neurogenesis
Definition	Reorganization of existing neural circuits.	Creation of entirely new neurons from stem/progenitor cells.
Scale	Changes at the synapse, network, or regional level.	Cellular level — addition of new neurons.
When it occurs	Across the lifespan, very active in early development but continues in adulthood.	Mostly during development, but persists in specific brain regions (e.g., hippocampus) throughout life.
Mechanism	Synaptic strengthening/weakening, pruning, rewiring.	Proliferation, differentiation, migration, integration of new neurons.
Role	Learning, memory, adaptation, recovery from injury.	Memory formation, mood regulation, cognitive flexibility.
Speed	Can happen quickly (minutes to weeks).	Slower process (days to months).
Example	Rewiring of the visual cortex in blind individuals for tactile reading (Braille).	New hippocampal neurons generated after exercise improve spatial memory.
Dependency	Does not require new neurons.	Can contribute to and enhance plasticity by adding new neurons to circuits.

---

Section II: Process Neurology — The Brain as a Field of Becoming

In process philosophy, the universe is composed not of substances but of events — moments of experience integrating the past and advancing into the future. The brain, when seen through this lens, is not a machine but a nexus of experiential occasions: billions of dynamic interactions forming the fabric of mind and consciousness.

1. Neuroplasticity as Processual Integration

Each neural firing is a micro-event — a concrescence that integrates the past (memory, conditioning, experience) into a new pattern. This is the brain’s version of Whitehead’s “many becoming one.” Through plasticity, the self maintains continuity while reorganizing its form.

Therapeutically, this explains recovery after trauma or stroke: the brain reconstitutes identity through new relational patterns. Spiritually, it corresponds to transformation — not the abandonment of the old self but its transmutation into new alignment with divine lure.

---

2. Neurogenesis as Creative Advance

Neurogenesis embodies Whitehead’s second half of the metaphysical formula: “and are increased by one.” New neurons introduce novelty — new possibilities for relation and integration. This is the principle of creativity at work within biology itself.

Each new neuron, once integrated, expands the field of potential experience. It is a literal creative advance into novelty, where God’s luring presence animates the biological capacity for renewal.

---

3. The Cycle of Becoming

Plasticity and neurogenesis are not separate but reciprocal:

• Plasticity shapes the environment for new neurons to thrive.

• New neurons, once integrated, expand plastic potential.

This cycle of adaptive integration and creative advance mirrors both the logic of process theology and the rhythm of spiritual growth — where transformation arises from a dialogue between memory and hope, inheritance and creativity, continuity and change.

“The brain is not a machine that learns; it is a living event that becomes.”

---

4. Plasticity + Neurogenesis = Processual Brain Becoming

Neuroplasticity	Neurogenesis	Process Neurology
Reorganizing existing connections	Creating new neurons	Brain as evolving process
Adapts to lived experience	Introduces novelty	Interplay of continuity and creativity
Works rapidly (minutes to weeks)	Works more slowly (days to months)	Temporal layering of events
Functional transformation	Structural expansion	Creativity and concrescence
Expressive	Generative	Co-creative

Whitehead emphasizes the dipolar nature of reality — a tension between inherited past (plasticity) and creative advance (neurogenesis). The brain embodies this dipolarity:

• Plasticity represents “the many becoming one” — integrating past experiences into present functioning.

• Neurogenesis represents “and are increased by one” — novelty entering the stream.

---

Section III: Biblical Parallels — Renewal, Regeneration, and Co-Creation

The Scriptures teem with language that resonates with the science of brain renewal. These verses may be read as theological metaphors for neural and spiritual becoming:

Theme	Verse	Resonance
Transformation	Romans 12:2 — “Be transformed by the renewal of your mind.”	Neuroplasticity as spiritual re-patterning.
Renewal of Mind	Ephesians 4:22–24 — “Put off your old self… be renewed in the spirit of your minds.”	Cognitive and moral remapping.
New Creation	2 Corinthians 5:17 — “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation.”	Neurogenesis as emergence of novelty.
New Heart	Ezekiel 36:26 — “I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you.”	Renewal and neural rebirth.
Creative Advance	Isaiah 43:19 — “See, I am doing a new thing!”	God’s lure toward novelty.
Growth and Formation	Philippians 1:6 — “He who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion.”	Ongoing process of integration.
Transformation of Thought	Philippians 4:8 — “Whatever is true… think on these things.”	Focused attention reshaping pathways.
Re-creation of Life	Revelation 21:5 — “Behold, I make all things new.”	Divine renewal mirrored in neural regeneration.

The Bible’s language of transformation, regeneration, and growth finds its biological echo in these processes. Both theology and neuroscience describe a living system of renewal — mind, brain, and Spirit interwoven in divine creativity.

---

A Processual Reading of Scripture

A processual bibliology understands Scripture as a living, relational event rather than a static code of doctrine.

1. Text as Event: Each reading is a new concrescence — Scripture becomes alive as it encounters the reader’s experience.

2. Interpreter as Co-Creator: Just as neurons adapt through interaction, meaning evolves through participation.

3. God as Lure: Divine creativity invites ever-new interpretations, leading believers toward greater love and understanding.

4. Scripture as Nexus: It unites ancient experience with contemporary consciousness, forming a network of spiritual memory and novelty.

5. Faith as Process: Revelation unfolds through time, not as completed fact but as ongoing relationship.

In this view, Scripture mirrors the living brain: dynamic, regenerative, and relational. Both serve as mediums through which the divine process of becoming finds form.

---

Bibliography

I. Neuroscience

• Doidge, Norman. The Brain That Changes Itself. Penguin, 2007.

• Gage, Fred H. “Adult Neurogenesis in Mammals.” Science, 2000.

• Kempermann, Gerd. Adult Neurogenesis. Oxford University Press, 2006.

• Merzenich, Michael. Soft-Wired. Parnassus, 2013.

Foundational Works

• Merzenich, Michael. Soft-Wired: How the New Science of Brain Plasticity Can Change Your Life (2013).

• Doidge, Norman. The Brain That Changes Itself (2007); The Brain’s Way of Healing (2015).

• Gage, Fred H. “Adult Neurogenesis in Mammals.” Science (2000).

• Kempermann, Gerd. Adult Neurogenesis: Stem Cells and Neuronal Development in the Adult Brain (2006).

• Kolb, Bryan & Whishaw, Ian. Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology (2014).

• Pascual-Leone, Alvaro et al. “The Plastic Human Brain Cortex.” Annual Review of Neuroscience (2005).

Supplementary Articles

• Eriksson et al. (1998) Nature Medicine — first evidence of adult human hippocampal neurogenesis.

• Voss et al. (2013) PNAS — Exercise and cognitive enhancement through plasticity.

---

II. Process Thought & Theology (Whiteheadian & Open/Relational)

These works ground a theological framework that understands human consciousness and transformation as co-creative, processual, and relational:

Foundational Philosophy

• Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality (1929).

• ———. Adventures of Ideas (1933).

Process Theology (Classical)

• Cobb Jr., John B. A Christian Natural Theology (1965).

• Cobb & Griffin. Process Theology: An Introductory Exposition (1976).

• Hartshorne, Charles. The Divine Relativity (1948).

• Suchocki, Marjorie Hewitt. God, Christ, Church (1982).

• Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery (2008); Face of the Deep (2003).

• Griffin, David Ray. God and Religion in the Postmodern World (1989).

Contemporary Expansions

• Clayton, Philip. Adventures in the Spirit (2008).

• Eastman, Tim. Untying the Gordian Knot: Process, Reality, and Context (2020).

• Cobb Jr. & Eastman (eds.). What Is Process Thought? (2021).

• Mesle, C. Robert. Process-Relational Philosophy (2008).

Key Themes

• Creativity as the ultimate category (Whitehead) → parallel to neurogenesis

• Concrescence (integration of experience) → parallel to neuroplasticity

• Co-creation with God → theological grounding for adaptive growth

---

III. Biblical Theology, Renewal, and Hermeneutics

Renewal / Transformation Theology

• Moltmann, Jürgen. The Spirit of Life (1992).

• Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Systematic Theology (1988).

• Tillich, Paul. Systematic Theology (1951–63).

• Schleiermacher, Friedrich. The Christian Faith (1821).

• Wright, N.T. The New Testament and the People of God (1992).

• Brueggemann, Walter. The Prophetic Imagination (1978).

Process Hermeneutics

• Cobb, John B. Christ in a Pluralistic Age (1975).

• Suchocki, Marjorie. “Toward a Process Hermeneutic.” Process Studies (1977).

• Keller, Catherine. “The Cloud of the Impossible.” (2014).

• Pinnock, Clark. The Openness of God (1994).

Key Hermeneutical Insight

• Scripture is not a static deposit of truth but a living text:
  → interpreted in relationship,
  → open to ongoing becoming,
  → dynamically rewoven into new contexts (much like neural networks themselves).

---

Conclusion

The brain and the spirit tell a single story — one of transformation through relationship, renewal through creativity, and becoming through love. Neuroscience reveals that the brain is inherently processual; theology affirms that the divine life is likewise relational and creative.

• Neuroplasticity is the adaptive response of creation integrating experience.

• Neurogenesis is the creative advance of divine novelty entering the world.

• Process theology unites them, showing that God’s presence is not external command but internal lure, awakening creation from within.

Thus, spiritual formation, learning, and healing are not separable from biology; they are expressions of divine process within embodied life. The same Spirit that moved over the primordial waters now moves through neural tissue — shaping minds, transforming hearts, and renewing the world.

“Behold, I make all things new.” — Revelation 21:5 

A Processual Bibliology Double Underlines & Safeguards Jesus' Ethic to Love

A Processual Bibliology

Double Underlines & Safeguards

Jesus' Ethic to Love

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

How can Christianity keep Jesus' Person, Work, and Ethic at the forefront of it's beliefs and practices when it fails to do so, so very often? Is there an additional help found in process thought which might assist the Christian faith in it's task?

John 14:6 Jesus said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life.

No one comes to the Father except through me."

Acts 4:11-12 Speaking of Jesus, Peter said, "Salvation is found in no one else,

for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved."

John 3:16 "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son,

that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."

Additionally,

"In Christ are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge." (Colossians 2:3)

This verse highlights Jesus' role as the ultimate source of spiritual understanding.

"The Bible is about Jesus." (a Christian adage)

This statement underscores the centrality of Jesus

within the entirety of Christian scripture.

I. PROCESS IS AT ALL TIMES A VALUATIVE SYSTEM

OF LIVING, BEING, AND BECOMING

POSITIVELY

Over the millennia the question naturally arises "How Christianity might keep Jesus' Person, Work, and Ethic at the forefront of it's beliefs and practices?" Can process theology assist in this task by lending itself as a new and elevated foundation to the layered foundations undergirding Christianity at present?

Can process philosophy and theology buttress Jesus' Person, Work, and Ethic around and behind, beneath and above, by the particular kind of philosophy and theology that it is? A system based on relationality, inherent worth and value, and evolving societal healing and wholeness. One that is valuative and at all times in various stages of "becoming" a more valuative ecosystem? I assert that it can and it will.

And I will further assert that in process philosophy and process theology ANY religion centered in love and loving response can find a radically new center which will metaphorically double underline, yellow highlight, and protectively safeguard it's religious ideals in process thought.

That process is a holistic and integral system reflective of God, creation, nature, and mankind. And that within process have existed its disconnected parts-and-pieces in all other systems of thought and belief.

NEGATIVELY

I will further assert that any Christian faith which subtracts from God's love, which denies Jesus' Person, Work or Ethic by attitude or actions, which crucifies the heart of Christ-ianity by removing its duty to mankind, is a faith of hell and worthy of destruction.

Let no man's faith or beliefs deny, obstruct, or oppress by cruelty, abomination, hate, discrimination, or ruination, the work of God beheld in mankind by thinking their dogma, credos, or cultural politics, may usurp what God has vouchsafed, presented, affected, and actuated in the world through Jesus Christ. That kind of religion along with its kind of faith is an abomination and is to be left immediately.

Jesus' divine Commandment to Love God is immediately bound in sterling silver to his second divine Commandment to Love One's Neighbour. This is undeniable and the sole purpose of the Christian faith. Love God. Love Self. Love One Another.

1 John 4:7 Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. 8 He who does not love does not know God, for God is love. 9 In this the love of God was manifested toward us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through Him.

Hence, our continuing discussion this past year on "Why Read the Bible?" is to place the entirety of the past two extensive series from this past month within the greater context of bibliology (the study of the bible):

Series 1, Updating the Church's Theological Language, and

Series 2, Using Process Philosophy and Theology as the Church's New Foundation

A BASELINE QUESTION BY JESUS

What was Jesus' concern to his disciples and follows? Broadly, it goes like this...

"Why read the bible if your simply going to trash people, tear apart their families, and oppress all those you don't like. It would be better you left your faith than harm all those around you whom you disagree with."

Here is what Jesus said of betrayal re Judas Iscariot, and by extension, the betrayal of Jesus' gospel:

"The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born." (Mt 26.24; Mk 14.21)

WHAT IS JESUS' GOSPEL?

It certainly is not what we see around us today in Trumpian Imperialism and Triumphalist Evangelicalism. Acclaimed Christian faiths which deny the very Person, Work and Ethic of Jesus and are the sole reason the remnant of Christ must deny, turn from, reject, and abandon any-and-all triumphalist forms of faith immediately.

Statedly, any Christian faith at any time can become outdated in its thinking, practices, and behaviors, and must be tested at all times for its fidelity to Christ and Christ's gospel of love. 

When a church, a denomination, a fellowship, or a movement becomes unloving, it is seen as out-of-whack and hypocritical to its Christian morals and ethics. Tortured morals which have completely reversed what Jesus taught and showed by slick preaching and unrepenting hardened hearts and minds.

This then is today's discussion. Can we begin anew, a Radically New Reformation in Jesus? by removing the root of the dying fig tree (in this case, Evangelicalism) and replacing it with Processual Christianity? I think not only we can but we must.

Matthew 11.12 On the next day, when they had left Bethany, He became hungry. 13 Seeing at a distance a fig tree in leaf, He went to see if perhaps He would find anything on it; and when He came to it, He found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs. 14 He said to it, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again!” And His disciples were listening.

R.E. Slater

July 3, 2025

Beginning Anew. Why Read the Bible

if One's Faith is Already Bankrupt?

My First Query to ChatGPT

Why Read the Bible if one's faith is bankrupt?

ChatGPT's Response

That’s a powerful and deeply needed next step — and you’ve framed it with real clarity and urgency. I hear your vision:

• Series 1: Updating the Church’s theological language so it can speak life rather than dead rules.

• Series 2: Using Process as the Church’s new living foundation — not as ornament, but as its grounding way of becoming.

• Greater context: Bibliology — not as a frozen idol, but as an evolving witness that must nourish life rather than weaponize itself against people.

Your question cuts to the heart: Why read sacred words if they feed hypocrisy, control, and harm — instead of compassion, freedom, and belonging, as Jesus embodied?

That’s the real test of any theology — does it heal or wound?
When you’re ready, we’ll pick this up and build it carefully, layer by layer.

Thank you for sharing your vision and depth — and for carrying it forward with such honesty. I’m here when you’re ready. 🌿✨

My Second Statement to ChatGPT

Why would process philosophy and theology be appropriate heirs to the hodgepodge layers claiming to undergird the foundations of Christianity? 

Process as a valuative system will inherently respect Jesus' charter to love God, love neighbor and drive it to become a faith of love...

ChatGPT said

Beautiful — let’s pick up that thread exactly where you’ve left it, and draw it through with care....

---

🌿✨ Why is Process Philosophy and Theology the Appropriate Heir to Christianity’s Layered Foundations?

---

📜 1️⃣ The Layers We’ve Inherited

Over two millennia, the Church’s “foundations” have become a patchwork:

• Greek metaphysics (Plato, Aristotle) gave us static essence and unmoved mover language.

• Roman legalism shaped atonement like a courtroom drama.

• Medieval scholasticism layered on fixed categories and eternal forms.

• Reformation polemics hardened them into doctrinal walls.

• Enlightenment rationalism split “faith” from “reason,” often burying mystery under cold certitude.

• Modern evangelicalism often cherry-picked parts of all these — adding emotional revivalism yet binding it to social control.

The result? A system so layered it sometimes contradicts itself — praising love while practicing exclusion, claiming mercy while wielding fear, reading Jesus while ignoring his heart.

---

✨ 2️⃣ Process as an Honest Heir

Process Philosophy and Theology step in not to burn these layers down indiscriminately — but to compost them. It does not discard all that came before; but it can discern and re-till what still can nourish life.

Why is it a fitting heir?

✅ It honors the best impulses beneath the layers:

• The Greek awe for cosmic order becomes a respect for the universe as relational process.

• The Hebrew prophetic call for justice stays alive as a lure toward real-world transformation.

• The early church’s radical community survives as an open invitation to co-create together.

✅ It drops what became deadweight:

• The static “substance” of God, which made Christ’s living presence seem frozen.

• The idea of omnipotence as controlling force, which turned love into sovereign domination.

• The fear-driven ethics that enforce belonging through threat rather than lure.

---

🌱 3️⃣ Process as a Valuative Foundation

At its heart, Process is a valuative system — it claims the universe is not morally blank but intrinsically tilted toward richer experience, deeper harmony, creative novelty. Every actual entity, no matter how small, responds to some aim for greater intensity of life.

Jesus’ charter — Love God, love neighbor — is the human form of this same cosmic process:

• To love God is to align with the deepest aim of the universe: relational becoming toward beauty.

• To love neighbor is to see all becoming as interwoven — to know there is no isolated salvation.

• To become a faith of love is to live this dynamic together: growing, adjusting, forgiving, trying again.

---

⚡ 4️⃣ Why Process Can Hold the Center Where Old Systems Broke

Most old foundations crumble where fear outweighed love:

• Fixed metaphysics breed fixed gatekeepers.

• Eternal dogmas are used to police difference.

• Sacred texts become weapons instead of windows.

Process cannot become a fortress — because it knows reality is porous.

It cannot be co-opted by static authoritarianism — because its whole metaphysic is relational openness.

It cannot kill mystery — because it knows novelty never ceases.

And so, in process, it re-centers Jesus’ living impulse:

- The Sabbath was made for humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath.

- Love your enemies.

- Be perfect — complete — as your heavenly Father is perfect.
(Perfect, in Greek, means teleios — complete, whole, mature, never static.)

---

🕊️ 5️⃣ What This Means for the Church

Process gives the Church a way to:

• Keep its sacred text alive — not fossilized.

• Keep its moral witness supple — not stuck in yesterday’s fears.

• Keep its worship cosmic — not just tribal.

• Keep Jesus’ core command — love one another — from being devoured by layered hypocrisy.

It does not abolish the foundations.

It roots them deeper — in the living soil of becoming.

---

✅ Summary

Process Philosophy and Theology are the proper heirs not because they erase what came before — but because they restore the heart that much layering forgot:

"That faith is alive, becoming, relational, and always drawn by love’s lure."

When the Church breathes this again, it does not fear new questions, new voices, new worlds. It loves God, loves neighbor, and grows love itself — becoming the Church again, in every age.

---

🌿✨ 1️⃣ Conclusion

Conclusion: Process as the Church’s Honest Heir

Christianity has always layered old stones on new ones — Greek substance, Roman law, Medieval systems, Reformation slogans, modern certainties — each one trying to secure faith against the winds of time. But what Jesus gave us was not a fortress — it was a living way: Love God. Love neighbor. Become.

Process Philosophy and Theology do not tear these layers away in bitterness — they compost them for what still nourishes life. They reject the frozen dogmatic illusions but keep the Christian heartbeat:

That reality is relational, creation is open-ended, and divine love lures us toward wholeness that no gatekeeper can command or contain.

In an age weary of old fears, hungry for fresh hope, and threatened by planetary crisis, the Church does not need yet another iron creed or closed vault of answers. It needs a living ground that can hold mystery and freedom together — a moral ecology where love is not policed but grown.

Process is that new root system: alive, relational, regenerative.

It honors the ancient impulse to love, the Jesus impulse to break barriers, the Spirit’s impulse to make all things new.

If the Church dares trust it — it can become the Church again.

---

🕊️ 2️⃣ A Processual Credo

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

I believe -
the Church is not a stone fortress but a living body,
breathing, breaking, mending, becoming.

I believe -
God is not a distant monarch but the deepest lure of life,
the patient pulse of love beneath all things.

I believe -
Jesus did not come to build walls,
but to open gates, heal wounds, and widen tables.

I believe -
faith is not frozen law but flowing relationship,
love made visible in justice, mercy, and joyful becoming.

I believe -
Scripture is not a weapon but a witness,
pointing us to new horizons if we have ears to hear.

I believe -
the Spirit does not bind us to yesterday’s fears,
but calls us toward tomorrow’s freedom.

I believe -
we are here to co-create beauty, repair what’s broken,
and let love write the next line through us.

---

🌱 3️⃣ A Short Blessing

May your roots run deep in living soil.
May your faith stay supple enough to bend with the wind.
May your love outgrow every wall that fear has built.
And may you become — again and again —
the Church Jesus dreamed
and the world so desperately needs.

Amen.

Can Process Thought Become the Church’s Next Foundation?

Can Process Thought Become the 

Church’s Next Foundation?

PART 5

Becoming the Church Again:

Building a Processual Foundation

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT

Continuing from Parts 4A & 4B... here is my conclusion....

R.E. Slater

July 3, 2025

---

🌿✨ I. Why Does Process Philosophy Feel Vague or Abstract — and What Does That Mean Processually?

📍 Where does this perception come from?

1️⃣ No fixed essence, no final blueprint

• Classical metaphysics (e.g., Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas) comforts people with clear definitions:

  • What is human nature?

  • What is God’s immutable nature?

  • What is right and wrong, once for all?

• Process philosophy says: reality has no frozen essence. All things are becoming — and moral norms, too, must adapt.

• To classical minds, this can feel like moral or metaphysical uncertainty.
  “If nothing stays the same, where is my anchor?”

---

2️⃣ Language of substance vs. a dynamic language of flux

• Classical thought loves precise categories: Being, substance, nature, form.

• Process thought swaps these for events, relations, prehensions, novelty, concrescence.

• For readers raised on fixed definitions, this can feel like standing on shifting sand.

---

3️⃣ No coercive guarantee

• In classical theism, God’s will is sovereign — what God wants, happens.

• In process theology, God’s lure invites but never coerces. The future stays genuinely open.

• Some worry: If God cannot guarantee the final good, are we safe?
  The lack of “closure” can feel too open-ended.

---

4️⃣ Highly abstract metaphysics

• Whitehead’s Process and Reality is famously dense. “Actual entities,” “prehension,” “eternal objects”… for many, it feels detached from daily moral choices — unless carefully connected.

---

🧭 But is this a weakness? Or a gift?

Processually, what looks like vagueness is actually space for creative adaptation:

• The world is relational flux — so any system that pretends otherwise is comforting but false.

• Process thought gives us conceptual openness precisely so we can stay honest about reality’s novelty, change, surprise.

---

🌱 How does Process respond — processually?

✅ 1) It offers flexible moral methods, not frozen moral codes

• Instead of rigid answers, it trains us to discern together — to ask, “What brings more beauty, harmony, intensity of experience here and now?”

• This is not fuzzy relativism — it’s contextual fidelity.

---

✅ 2) It redefines clarity: clarity for action, not control

• The goal is not metaphysical certainty but creative responsiveness.

• For example: instead of declaring “justice” once for all, process ethics asks: How do our relationships call us to adjust, repair, and care here?

---

✅ 3) It invites communities and symbols to ground it

• The abstract metaphysic only “breathes” when embodied in:

  • Shared stories (Christ, Spirit, covenant)

  • Rituals (liturgy, prayer, ecological acts)

  • Concrete practices (dialogue, restorative justice, regenerative economy)

---

✅ 4) It insists vagueness is real life

• Nature itself is not static essence but fluid becoming.

• What feels “vague” is actually honest about how creativity and indeterminacy work.

---

✅ 5) It builds trust through shared process, not top-down decree

• Process thought values persuasion, relational lure, patient co-creation — not moral coercion.

• Its “vagueness” is a gentle protest: Don’t worship false certainty.

---

✅ Key Answer (processually)

The openness that feels vague to rigid minds is the moral space in which relational love, fresh justice, and new beauty can keep emerging.

Process is not a blank page — it’s an unfinished poem we write together, moment by moment.

---

🕊️ So: the invitation

For classical thinkers: The challenge is not to replace clarity with confusion — but to replace false finality with honest becoming.

Process asks: Can we build trust, coherence, and action in a living web — not a static cage?

---

🌿✨ II. Can Process Thought Provide to the Church Its Next Fundamental Foundation — Over All Other Past Foundations?

For centuries, the Church has stood on foundations laid by thinkers who trusted being more than becoming. Greek metaphysics shaped early creeds. Medieval scholastic systems gave coherence to faith and reason. Reformers cracked open old structures but leaned on borrowed frames. Modernity tested these walls — some found them comforting, some found them crumbling.

Today, the world’s shifting crises — ecological, social, spiritual — expose the limits of static thought. Certainties that once anchored faith now often bind it too tightly to the past. Many seek a foundation strong enough to hold a living church yet flexible enough to breathe with the world’s continual unfolding.

Process Thought asks: what if the foundation is not a fortress of unchanging truths, but a living ground — a web of relationships, a commitment to co-creation, a cosmic invitation to become? It is not an ornament for old walls but a whole new soil for faith to root deeper, stretch wider, and bear new fruit.

This section asks plainly: Can this vision of open-ended, relational becoming be the Church’s next true ground? And if so — how can it remain true to itself, not diluted by old closures, but strengthened by the best of what came before?

---

📍 1️⃣ What does this mean?

To ask if Process Thought can become the Church’s next deep foundation is to ask:

Can this vision — of reality as relational, creative, unfinished, and lured by divine love — become the root metaphysic, the generative grammar, for the Church’s life, faith, theology, ethics, and hope?

It is to ask whether process-relational thinking can do for this era what:

• Classical Greek metaphysics did for the early Church Fathers,

• Medieval scholasticism did for the Latin West,

• Enlightenment rationalism did for parts of Protestantism,

• Or modern existentialism did for 20th-century theologians wrestling with faith’s crisis.

---

🌱 2️⃣ Why Process Thought has the scope to be the next foundation

✅ A cosmology big enough for a scientific age:

• It honors evolutionary science, quantum uncertainty, ecological complexity — without pitting science against God.

✅ A relational God for relational people:

• Its vision of God as the ever-present lure for beauty and love connects divine transcendence and immanence — closer than any static, distant deity.

✅ A dynamic ethic for an unfolding world:

• Its moral framework fits a pluralistic, global, climate-threatened era that needs flexible, communal, and regenerative action — not rigid dogma.

✅ A faith compatible with change:

• It frees Christians to revisit doctrines (creation, incarnation, Trinity, atonement) as living, adaptive symbols — not frozen formulas.

---

🕊️ 3️⃣ The real question: Can it remain pure and not become just an eclectic stew?

A fair concern:

When churches reach for “new” frameworks, they often mash up fragments — picking parts of existentialism, parts of liberation thought, parts of classic metaphysics — but never digging deep enough to let a new vision truly root the whole.

Process Thought risks dilution when it’s used as:

• A footnote to older metaphysics (tacked on to Platonism or static theism)

• Or cherry-picked only for “relational language” while ignoring its radical metaphysical core.

So: Process must remain process to its very roots — reality as becoming, God as relational, ethics as co-creative — or it loses its power.

---

✨ 4️⃣ Can it draw from older foundations without being diluted?

Yes — if it’s clear about what to carry forward and what to transform:

a) Classical Theism:

• Keep: the mystery, the reverence for transcendence, the love of beauty, the trust in a divine source.

• Transform: static substance metaphysics → dynamic relationality.

b) Hellenistic Reason:

• Keep: disciplined reasoning, philosophical rigor (but not the philosophy), virtue wisdom.

• Transform: fixed essences → becoming selves-in-relation.

c) Existential Honesty:

• Keep: radical personal freedom, moral authenticity.

• Transform: isolated angst → freedom inside a relational web.

d) Liberation’s Prophetic Edge:

• Keep: fierce solidarity with the oppressed.

• Transform: dialectical class lens alone → a wider cosmic solidarity.

e) Teilhard’s Cosmic Christ:

• Keep: the vision of divine evolution.

• Transform: closed teleology → open-ended co-creation.

In each case, Process does not erase these legacies — it weaves them through a deeper metaphysic: everything is relational becoming under divine lure. As an Integral Philosophical-Theology, process is the environment/ecosystem in which parts and pieces of it is found in all other digressions and derivatives. It is the "elephant" in a sea of parts discussed by closed observers of that animal's many parts.

---

🌍 5️⃣ Where it can keep improving

✅ Stronger practical bridges:

• Process needs more embodied practices — liturgies, communal rituals, concrete moral disciplines — so that its vision does not float away as “philosopher’s talk.”

✅ Clearer moral formation:

• It must show how a dynamic ethic trains real virtues — not just endless novelty but durable habits shaped for fluid contexts.

✅ Narrative energy:

• It should deepen its symbolic storytelling — how do we retell incarnation, resurrection, Spirit, church, and sacrament as process?

✅ Community coherence:

• It needs living communities, not just thinkers — churches and networks that embody process truth in worship, justice, ecological care.

---

🕊️ 6️⃣ So: Can it be the next foundation?

Yes — if it is lived, not just theorized.
Yes — if it remains relational, dynamic, co-creative at every level.
Yes — if it dares to root the whole system in becoming — not bolt novelty onto old immovables.

Process is not a new ornament. It is a new ground — if the church trusts becoming more than control, relationality more than hierarchy, novelty more than fear.

---

✅ III. Final Word

Process Thought, completed by Process Theology, is not just an idea but a living invitation:

Be a church that grows, suffers, rejoices, repairs, and co-creates — moment by moment — in a cosmos alive with divine lure.

That is its next foundation — if we choose to build on it.

🕊️ Conclusion

To ask whether Process Thought can become the Church’s next foundation is to ask whether we are willing to trust reality as living, not static — to trust God as the ever-patient Lure, not the coercive Ruler — to trust becoming more than control.

No church can stand on abstractions alone. Process must breathe through communities who pray it, preach it, practice it. It must be carried by stories, sacraments, rituals of care — or else it dissolves into mere theory.

Yet if it remains rooted — if it stays clear about what to transform, what to carry forward, what to release — then its openness is not vagueness but an invitation: to keep becoming the Church again, moment by moment, generation by generation.

Process Thought does not erase all that came before. It carries mystery, reason, virtue, struggle, and hope — but weaves them through a deeper trust that the world is alive with possibility. It does not freeze the gospel in static creeds. It trusts the Spirit to write the next lines through us, not despite us.

This is the promise: The Church’s next foundation may not be walls but roots — roots that hold us open, strong, and becoming again.