The Incarnational Cosmic Christ, Part 2

The Incarnational Cosmic Christ

PART 2

Compiled by R.E. Slater

de Chardin's Relationship

with Process Theology

I am reiterating Teilhard de Chardin's (TdC)view of the Cosmic Christ here below. At times close to Whitehead's process thought in many components, de Chardin's Catholic view was more vitalist in approach positing a muscular psycho-spiritual form of teleology into evolutionary progress.

In the past, as well as the present, both Catholic and Protestant beliefs have struggled with accepting Darwinian evolution - which viewpoint the French Jesuit priest de Chardin promoted, stating that all creation was moving towards an "Omega Point" in Christ. A theological statement which a Christ-centered process theology would be sympathetic towards, however, de Chardin's metaphysic is more theological than it is philosophic making it much less broad than Whitehead's process metaphysic (I will explain what I mean by this in the next several articles). For now here are a few observations leading into "The Incarnational Cosmic Christ."

At the center of TdC's philosophy was the belief that the human species is evolving spiritually, progressing from a simple faith to higher and higher forms of consciousness, including a consciousness of God, and culminating in the ultimate understanding of humankind's place and purpose in the universe.

SIMILARITIES

Creation as Christo-Centric:

Both Teilhard de Chardin and Whitehead's process philosophy / theology emphasized a dynamic, evolving universe and a God who is immanent in creation.

Their views of Christ and the nature of the divine also differed significantly, with process theology understanding Christ as God's divine agent responding to God's call of creation, while Teilhard sees Christ as the cosmic center of evolution.

Emphasis on Evolution and a Dynamic Universe:

Both Teilhard and process thinkers see the universe as a dynamic, evolving process, not a static entity.

Immanence of God:

Both emphasize God's presence and involvement in the world, rather than a distant, transcendent God.

Cosmic Christ:

Both view Christ as having a cosmic significance, not just a historical or local one. 

Cosmological and Evolutionary Framework:

Both Teilhard de Chardin’s mysticism and process philosophy emphasize a dynamic evolving universe. For de Chardin, Christ represents the Omega Point, the ultimate goal of the evolutionary process toward greater complexity and unity. This resonates with process theology's idea of the "Divine lure," where God calls creation towards greater complexity and fulfillment.

Process philosophy, particularly through figures like Alfred North Whitehead, emphasizes the processual nature of reality, where everything is in constant flux and development, much like Teilhard’s understanding of the universe evolving towards a unifying point of divine fulfillment.

Immanence of God:

Both perspectives see God as immanent in the world, guiding and participating in the unfolding of creation. In de Chardin’s view, Christ is present in every part of the universe, drawing it toward its divine fulfillment. Similarly, process theology views God as deeply involved in the unfolding process of the world, working within the world to inspire growth, order, and harmony.

Christ as a Cosmic Principle:

In de Chardin’s mysticism, Christ is not just a personal savior but also a cosmic figure — the Christogenesis or the principle by which the universe reaches its ultimate zenith or unity. This connects with process theology's idea of God as both a personal presence and a guiding cosmic force. Christ, for de Chardin, is the focal point of the universe's evolutionary trajectory, and this aligns with process theology’s understanding of God's role as a co-creator with the world.

PSEUDO-DIFFERENCES

Christ's Role in Creation:

• Teilhard de Chardin viewed Christ as the ultimate point of convergence for all of creation’s evolutionary journey — the Omega Point. His Christology is highly metaphysical, rooted in an esoteric understanding of cosmic evolution.

• Process theology, however, does not necessarily view Christ as the sole focus of cosmic evolution but as a key participant in the unfolding divine process. In Whitehead’s framework, Christ (or the Christ Principle) is seen as an aspect of God's interaction with the world rather than the singular focus of cosmic progression.

• This then forces the question, "What does the person of Christ (not the work of Christ) mean in a philosophical v theological sense? That is, "How is Christ the objective end of the universe? In theological language it is readily apparent but in philosophical language process thought must go beyond the ontology of the Person to the metaphysic itself - which in God, is one-and-the-same, envisioning a dance of symmantics. Which is why de Chardin's Christogenic OmegaPoint can be seen as sympathetic to process thought though limiting in its metaphysic (again, I will explain in several follow up articles).

The Nature of God and Creation:

• Teilhard’s view is more panentheistic — God is both within and beyond creation, and Christ is the divine principle that encapsulates the unity of the world’s evolutionary ascent.

• In process thought, God is also panentheistic but the emphasis is often on God’s dynamic relationship with the world. God is understood to both suffer with creation and persuade it toward greater good, with Christ being an incarnation of this divine process.

Teleologic Eschatology:

• Teilhard de Chardin’s eschatology is highly optimistic, seeing the entire universe ultimately converging in the Christ at the Omega Point — a kind of final cosmic unity and perfection. This view has a very teleological (goal-oriented) aspect to it.

• Process theology, while hopeful, often rejects a strict end-point of perfection. The future in process thought is more open-ended, with the possibility for ongoing transformation and growth, and doesn’t always adhere to the idea of a final cosmic goal in the way de Chardin envisioned.

CONCLUSION

While Teilhard de Chardin’s mystic view of Christ and process theology share a very close cosmic and evolutionary framework and a deep sense of divine immanence, Teilhard’s Christology is more metaphysical, esoteric, and teleological, whereas process theology offers a more relational and open-ended view of God's involvement in the world. The integration of Christ into the evolutionary process, central to de Chardin’s thought, parallels process philosophy's idea of God’s involvement in creation but differs in its scope and finality.

---

de Chardin's Relationship

with the Catholic Church

Summary:

While the Catholic Church previously issued a monitum (warning) against Teilhard de Chardin's writings in 1962, there's a growing trend of positive recognition and engagement with his ideas, including references by multiple popes, though a formal rehabilitation remains absent. Here's a more detailed breakdown:

Initial Condemnation:

In 1962, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (formerly the Holy Office) issued a monitum against Teilhard de Chardin's writings, citing "dangerous ambiguities and grave errors". 

Shift in Perspective:

Despite the initial warning, there's been a noticeable shift in the Church's perspective on Teilhard, with multiple popes making positive references to his work. 

Pope Francis's Influence:

Pope Francis, in particular, has been quoted as referencing Teilhard's writings, including in "Laudato Si'," which has led to speculation about a potential rehabilitation of Teilhard's work. 

Positive Recognition:

Scholars from the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Culture have noted Teilhard's "prophetic vision," and some supporters have called for him to be named a Doctor of the Church or for the monitum to be removed. 

Ongoing Dialogue:

The Church continues to engage with Teilhard's ideas, with the opening of the Teilhard de Chardin Center in a Paris suburb serving as a place for dialogue between science, philosophy, and spirituality. 

No Formal Rehabilitation:

While there are positive signs, the Church has not formally reversed the 1962 monitum or declared Teilhard a Doctor of the Church. 

---

THE COSMIC CHRIST

REFORMULATING THE CLASSICAL FAITH

Published in The Furrow, April 2024

by Hilda Geraghty

The article presents an overview, in thumb-nail sketches, of new perspectives in theology as it meets today’s cosmic worldview. It offers a dynamic, holistic view of creation, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all existence. It offers the notion of a universal imperfection and the concept of a very human Christ, along with cosmic dimensions of the Eucharist. The emphasis on unity, collective consciousness, and the need for a goal to energize the world lead to a hope-filled conclusion.

Theology is a vast field of study, but at the cutting edge its perspectives are beginning to embrace the newly-discovered dimensions of reality.  Interdisciplinary approaches, where science and faith embrace, are revealing a beautiful and unifying story that is hope-inspiring and energising for the human task of building the world, even as it offers us breathtaking vistas for worship.  When the ground under them moves from static to dynamic, and expands to almost infinite space-time, the core Christian mysteries of Creation, Fall, Incarnation, Redemption, Resurrection and Pleroma, become transposable like melodies into a new key, without losing anything of their integrity.

A TRANSFORMED VIEW OF CREATION

The first of these is the new perspective on creation, which, as we now know, began in deep time, around fourteen billion years ago.  The history of the universe, from elementary quantum particles generated in the ‘big bang’ to the furthest reaches of space, is one single vast process, that is, one great story.  The result is that we have moved from a human-centred view of creation, where we saw ourselves as Lords and Masters of a static world, to a cosmic awareness in which we are one part of a great unfolding story. Teilhard de Chardin writes:

“Humankind is not the centre of the universe, as we once thought in our simplicity, but something much more wonderful- the arrow pointing the way to the final unification of the world in terms of life.  The human alone constitutes the last-born, the freshest, the most complicated, the most subtle of all the successive layers of life.” (1)

THE WHOLE GREATER THAN ITS PARTS

The beauty of this cosmic story is that it hangs together as a whole.  We now realise that nothing or no one exists on its own. Creation is a Whole, and is greater than the sum of its parts.  Moreover, this cosmic story is dynamic, in a continuous movement of development, known as evolution. Creation is on-going.

There is a basic oneness about the nature of reality itself:  matter and energy are now seen as different forms of the same thing, and energy is a form of spirit.  “Foundational to the quantum worldview is the perception that everything in creation is energy.  It is all that is- and everything that is.  Empty space is full of creative energy; the perceived emptiness is actually a fulness.“ (2)

The universe is actually a spiritual reality, and we no longer divide it into such categories as spiritual and material, sacred and secular, superior and inferior.  All of creation is holy, and all our lives can be holy when lived in deep cooperation with the Whole.

THE CREATIVE BREATH OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

These advances in creation theology focus with new appreciation on the Holy Spirit, the creative Breath of God, who continually brings all things into being. We understand the Holy Spirit “as the primary manifestation of the divine in our earthly-human awareness, and as the first intuitive and mystical insight into the meaning of God.” (3) The great Holy Spirit has always breathed life into creation from the beginning of time, and the human calling is now seen as co-creating with the Spirit. “God does not so much make things as make them make themselves.” (4) The immanence of God in the world is being freshly appreciated, drawing us into deeper intimacy with the Divine Presence in all things.   Pope Francis reminds us that “If the universe unfolds in God, who fills it completely … there is a mystical meaning to be found in a leaf, in a mountain trail, in a dewdrop, in a poor person’s face.”  (5)

THE DEEP INCARNATION OF CHRIST

In this awesome perspective theologians are coming to describe the Christ event as ‘Deep Incarnation’.  Jesus is not seen as coming to the universe ‘from outside’, as it were, but that, like every other life form, he too in his human nature emerges organically from nature’s deep time as a Homo Sapiens, made of star dust and fruit of aeons of development.  The birth of Christ is the whole reason for the world to exist, and the growth of Christ is its business.  In the words of Teilhard de Chardin: 

“God did not will individually the sun, the earth, plants, or humanity.  God willed His Christ.  And in order to have Christ, God had to create the spiritual world and humanity in particular, upon which Christ might germinate.  And to have humanity God had to launch the vast process of organic life which is an essential organ of the world.  And the birth of that organic life called for the entire cosmic turbulence…” (6) A little later he continues “…Christ is so engrained in the visible world that Christ could henceforth be torn away from it only by rocking the foundations of the universe.” (7)

UNIVERSAL IMPERFECTION

In the new perspectives the understanding of ‘original sin’ morphs from being a once-off choice by an initial pair of humans that somehow blighted everyone, to the defective state of a species, a whole world still in formation, still unfinished.  It can be seen as universal imperfection, or a slowness to make the effort to evolve further.  In that view, the story of Adam and Eve illustrates our on-going reality: it is a portrait of human nature, of people still on their way to God, who do not want to listen to their conscience (‘voice of God’).  Paradise lies up ahead at the term of our collective evolution, rather than lost behind us in an actual past history. “Evolution is a laborious process… of trying things out, so that disaster, pain, suffering and death necessarily go with it.  In a world of this sort evil is no accident… It is an essential aspect of an evolutionary process which has to pick its way through a maze of errors and misplaced efforts. Since God willed to create a world that must grow to its completion via an evolution, imperfection and evil were bound to occur in this creation.  It could not be otherwise.” (8)

IN WHAT SENSE A SAVIOUR?

Because evil is so endemic, the world stands in radical need of salvation.  Salvation by Christ therefore also has cosmic dimensions.  In this context ‘salvation’ means that humanity, individually and collectively, is brought on-course in the evolutionary journey, as opposed to getting derailed and failing to reach our fulfilment in God (Omega). Through incarnating in this world Jesus, the Divine Human, inevitably meets this shadow side of creation and, as we would expect him to, tackles it head on.  However he does so in a totally counter-intuitive way.  In him evil meets love and is defeated by it, the only energy capable of doing so.  

John the Baptist had defined Jesus as the Lamb of God, -not the Lion, or the Bull, or the Eagle,  but the Lamb, gentle and vulnerable.  In his passion and death Jesus stands before us as God’s sign, the One sent by God, as he self-identified at his trial before the Sanhedrin and before the world.  By accepting and suffering the cross we imposed on him, Jesus places Godself in the position to forgive sin, since to forgive something you must have suffered it.  He thus restores the relationship between God and our repentant selves. As the Lamb who forgives the sins of the world Jesus makes evolution his cause and becomes its very soul, leading the human race forward through love towards a mysterious destiny. This will be when humanity finally unifies in love, focused on Omega-God.  This process too is on-going.  Repenting-forgiving love is what repairs the ever-breaking, ever-wounding, ever-falling Whole on its journey, and Jesus calls his followers in turn to channel this healing energy into life at all levels.  

Relationality is key.  In the new perspectives ‘sin’ is seen as letting down the Whole, in my/our patch of reality by damaging or breaking relationships in a multitude of ways. ‘Hell’ is the fact that there is nowhere good to go if a person breaks away from the Whole through serious unrepented wrongdoing.  ‘Holiness’ is personal evolution into love, as individuals grow towards Omega.  ‘Heaven’ begins now as we live love, sharing the mission of the Lamb. 

THE RESSURECTION OF CHRIST

The resurrection is God’s great sign, vindicating Jesus’ claim to be indeed the One sent by God, and the victory of love over evil.  It shows that to love, repent and forgive are wisdom, not foolishness.   In the risen flesh of Christ matter has become spiritualised, pointing to a future resurrection of all in Christ, when heaven and earth are drawn into union, the mysterious pleroma [fulness, completion].  “And I will raise them up on the last day.”  (Jn 6, 52) This, then, will complete the unfinished story. So, with proper balance, the Christ event is seen not only as repairing broken relationships, but as leading this world towards its final fulfilment in a love that converges in Omega.  “The essence of Christianity is nothing more or less than a belief in the world’s coming to be one in God, through the taking of human nature by Christ.” (9)

THE VERY HUMAN CHRIST

The Incarnation of Christ enacts the supreme meaning of the universe, and yet Jesus, the Divine Human, is not lost as an individual in this vast perspective.  By living normally for ninety per cent of his short life, working for eighteen of his thirty-three years at his carpenter’s bench, Jesus is seen as endorsing our human vocation to build the earth through work.  The new theology reclaims the complete life of Jesus, and not only his public life, because his whole life builds the Kingdom of God.  Long in coming, we are now allowed to love the world, the Whole, as God’s creation, and to engage with it passionately in all walks of life as we seek to progress God’s Kingdom here on earth.  The whole Church now fully recognises the dignity and holiness of the lay vocation to build this world according to Christ’s values, doing a good job.  However, we do not forget that “If undertaken in pliant surrender, the pursuit of Christ in the world culminates logically in an impassioned enfolding, heavy with sorrow, in the arms of the Cross.”  (10)

Dutch theologian N.M Wildiers writes, “It is precisely because we live in a world which is under construction that our labour takes on a new value and a capital importance. The human task coincides exactly with the duty to carry out the great work of evolution and guide it to completion…  Teilhard urges us to go beyond every form of secularism by including the values of the earth in a Christocentric vision of the world.” (11)

The new theology also underpins the new worldwide ecological movement, a love-energy arising almost too late.  In this way Christianity moves beyond spiritual individualism to collectively empower us to build a better world, as it is called to do.  (In so doing, of course, we will find that ‘our souls have been saved’.)  In the words of Teilhard:

“Eating, drinking, working, seeking; creating beauty, or truth, or happiness- all these things could have seemed to us just like varied activities… Now, directed towards the Super-Christ, the variety draws itself together.  Like the countless shades that combine in nature to produce a single white light, so the infinite modes of action are fused, without being confused, into one single colour under the mighty power of the universal Christ. And it is love that heads this movement: love…the higher, universal and synthesised form of spiritual energy in which all the other energies of the soul are transformed and redirected, once they fall within the field of Omega.  In that centre every activity is amorised.  A super-humankind calls for a Super-Christ.  A Super-Christ calls for a Super-Charity.” (12)

THE COSMIC EUCHARIST

Within the new perspectives our understanding of the Eucharist, centre of our faith, also grows naturally to cosmic dimensions.  As Pope St John Paul writes,

” I have been able to celebrate Holy Mass in chapels built along mountain paths, on lakeshores and seacoasts… This varied scenario of celebrations of the Eucharist has given me a powerful experience of its universal and, so to speak, cosmic character. Yes, cosmic! Because even when it is celebrated on the humble altar of a country church, the Eucharist is always in some way celebrated on the altar of the world. It unites heaven and earth. It embraces and permeates all creation. The Son of God became man in order to restore all creation, in one supreme act of praise, to the One who made it from nothing.” (13)

Pope St John Paul might almost have been quoting from Teilhard’s Mass on the World, a text treasured by many, that par excellence celebrates its cosmic outreach into the whole of creation:

[After the consecration] “Once again the [divine] Fire has entered the Earth.

Without earthquake or thunderclap the Flame has lit up the whole world

from within.  All things are individually and collectively penetrated and flooded by it, from the inmost core of the tiniest atom……to the mighty sweep of the most universal laws of being…

In the new humanity which is begotten today the Word prolongs the unending act of his own birth.  And through his immersion in the world’s womb……the great waters of the kingdom of matter have, without even a ripple, been endowed with life.

No visible tremor marks this transformation beyond words, and yet mysteriously and in all truth, at the touch of the super-substantial Word…the immense host that is the universe is made flesh through your own incarnation, my God. …We are all of us together carried in the one world-womb, …yet each of us is our own little microcosm in which the Incarnation is wrought independently, with degrees of intensity.” (14)

How inspiring and meaningful liturgical texts will be when they incorporate something of this new cosmic language!  The universe itself will be made into an instrument resounding with the praise of Christ! 

TOWARDS THE FUTURE

The new perspectives intuit, tentatively, the course of evolution as we hurtle towards the future faster than many of us would like.  Despite living through two world wars (the first experienced at length as a stretcher-bearer on the front lines of battle), Teilhard continued to believe in the power of life to keep moving forward, a movement that would ultimately lead towards a unity of humankind.  An ever-increasing convergence was the feature he highlighted, as, through technology, our minds grow ever closer together into a living, collective consciousness,  both for better and also, as yet, for worse.   “We are gathered here as one big tribe and earth is the tent we all live in,” said Morgan Freeman as he opened the Men’s Football World Cup in 2023.   We must all learn to live together constructively or we will perish together. 

A goal is needed to energise us with hope. “The greatest event in the history of the earth, now taking place, may indeed be the gradual discovery, by those with eyes to see, not merely of Some Thing but of Some One at the peak of the evolving universe as it converges upon itself.” (15)

In other words, the Christian view sees the whole of history as an ascent of the world toward its fulfilment in Christ.  This cosmic vision is classic St Paul:

“His purpose He set forth in Christ, as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in Him, things in heaven and things on earth.”  (Eph1:9-10)

NEWLY RELEVANT   

As the Christian faith learns to accommodate these new cosmic perspectives, it finds itself regaining the relevance it has been gradually losing over the past three centuries.  It sounds real!  Most importantly, it invests the life of the laity with new dignity, holiness and purpose. They are building the values of Christ into the workings of this world,  doing God’s will “on earth as it is in heaven.”  The strength of this approach comes from its unified vision: God’s work is one, a single reality, and it generates a deeply holistic and refreshing spirituality.  For Christians there is no longer any conflict between science as it reveals material reality, and faith in Christ, Alpha and Omega of everything.  “A road is opening up: to make our way to heaven through earth…It [Christianity] is the very religion of evolution.” (16) This new story offers a horizon of hope for our troubled times.  

This renewed faith needs to make its way into every place where ‘traditional’ (static, dualistic, individualistic, oblivious to the universe) Christian faith is celebrated, prayed, sung, preached, taught, explored and transmitted to others.  There is a huge task of theological education to be done, a new ‘language’ to be learned, an evolutionary path to be trodden.  At the same time, of course, a broad education in cosmology is needed to underpin it.

The strength gained from drawing these two visions of science and the Christian faith into a single worldview will be phenomenal for the Christian life!  This faith can enable the Church to once more lead people of today and tomorrow into living as befits their responsibilities to the Divine Mystery, to each other and to the universe.  To conclude with the words of Ilia Delio, of the Christogenesis Center for developing Teilhardian thinking: “If we can imagine a new wholeness emerging through science and religion and developing renewed institutional systems for human flourishing, then can we realise a new type of planetary community.  The only way to predict the future is to create it, and the power to do so will come from those who are unbounded in love.” (17)

For more articles on Teilhard see: @teilharddechardinforall.com

REFERENCES

(1) Teilhard de Chardin: The Phenomenon of Man, p 224, translated by Bernard wall.  New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought, 2008.

(2) Diarmuid O’Murchú,  MSC, Doing Theology in an Evolutionary Way, p 12. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY. 2021.

(3) Ibid. p 95.

(4) T. de C., Towards the Future, p 125. Translated by René Hague, New York, Harcourt, 2002.

(5) Laudate Deum, 65.

(6) T.de C., Science and Christ, p 61, translated by René Hague, New York, Harper & Row, 1968.

(7) Ibid.., p 61.

(8) An Introduction to Teilhard de Chardin, N. M. Wildiers. P.143.  Collins. Fontana Books, London and harper & Row, New York 1968.

(9) T.de C. L’Énergie Humaine, p 113 Oeuvres VI.

(10) T.de C. Writings in Time of War, p 61, Tr, René Hague, New York: Harper & Row, 1968.

(11) N. M. Wildiers in the Foreword to Christianity and Evolution, by Teilhard de Chardin,  Orlando, new York, London, A Harvest Book, Harcourt Inc. First Harvest Edition 1974. P. 11, 13.

(12) T. de C., Science and Christ, p 170, translated by René Hague, New York, Harper & Row, 1968.

(13) Ecclesia de Eucharistia, April 17, 2003.

(14) T. de C., The Mass on the World, published in The Heart of Matter, p 123 translated by René Hague, A Harvest Book, Harcourt Inc.  San Diego, New York, London.

(15) T. de C., The Future of Man, p 293 Translated by Norman Denny. Collins. Fontana Books, London and Harper and Row, New York, 1964.

(16) T. de C., Christianity and Evolution, p 93. Tr. R. Hague. A Harvest Book, Harcourt, Inc. Orlando, New York, London. 1974.

(17) Ilia Delio, 23 Dec 2023, on a promotional email for the Christogenesis centre in America.

The Incarnational Cosmic Christ, Part 1

The Incarnational Cosmic Christ

PART 1

by R.E. Slater

I am going to begin a concentrated discourse of process philosophy which must necessarily take us into a great many fields of study. After fifteen years of forging 1) a new path for Christianity and 2) for faithful Christians to explore-and-consider (see The Calf Path of an Open, Discerning Faith which I wrote in November of 2012) I believe it's time to double down and give even greater root to this new directional assignment encumbering my heart. Roots which are both philosophical and theological.

Incarnational

I titled this post here "The Incarnational Christ" which means to me that the God who became man, and lived as a man, within the world of his creation, has transformed God's Self from "what-ness" to "being-ness." Now perhaps my ontology is wrong and God has always been a Cosmic Being of some sort but where it concerns humanity, I can easily make the case that God has furthered God's Being-ness by God's transforming human incarnation into this world we inhabit. (As an aside, God's Being-ness has ever been... God's Incarnation is making this fact evident to humans here.) 

Cosmic

By "Cosmic" I mean to assert that God as Christ was always existent and will always be existent. That as Creator, Christ must be as cosmic as Christ is Incarnational. That neither diminishes the other but significantly expands and expounds the other. If Christ is not Creator-God than Christ is less a cosmic Being than is understood.

Christ

Lastly, by "Christ" I mean "the Son of God" who is at the right hand of the Father and in fellowship with the Father and the Spirit. Though I prefer for simplicity's sake to think of God as One the bible and tradition seem to imply their is a tri-partness to God's Being... that of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. In essence, this speaks to me of relationship, experience, and presence.

Process

Not inconsequentially then does process philosophy and theology insist on the same qualities of panrelationalism, panexperientialisim and panpsychism all bound up in one cosmic ontological presence. Thus my attraction to process thought as it correlates quite nicely with traditional Christianity - and, might I add, other interrelated religious touchstones (sic, interfaith commonalities)

Conclusion

And so, I believe I am going to settle in and think through how a post-structural, metamodern, radically processual Christian faith might live and breath underneath it's verbiage. When I look at a healthy field of grasses and wildflowers swaying together under a small breeze, seeing, smelling, feeling within it its greenery and colours, I assume there resides healthy, complex ecosystem of roots. But should I dig those roots up I could further explore what makes the field of grasses and wildflowers so beautiful in its expanse and vibrancy.

Here, I intend to look at my process faith root-and-all, small-and-large, heartbeat-and-body, soul-and-spirit, as an expression of the God I love in correlation with process philosophy and theology. Now for those readers who want an expositional bible study they will need to go elsewhere... perhaps in my earlier discussions over the years; but here, I intend to use philosophical dialogue in conjunction with theological ideas so that your and my Christian faith not wilt under the intemperate suns of human ideologies conflicting this same faith. Why?

Because my theological faith built on loving ethics and community needs a bit more depth in order to breathe. I need to test it out a bit more... or help it extend and expand a bit more... into societal thinking. This project then is my missional project to the world of inter-religious and Christian faith. My request is to pray for the Spirit's continued enlightenment to dissect, discern, direct, discover, and help determine a healthy expression of God's announcement in Christ:

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life". - John 3.16

Peace,

R.E. Slater

March 28, 2025

"For God so loved the world...": This phrase highlights the profound and extensive love God has for humanity.

"...that he gave his only Son...": This emphasizes God's ultimate sacrifice, offering his Son, Jesus, as a means of salvation. 

"...that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life": This outlines the consequence of faith in Jesus: eternal life, not death.

What Is Open Theism

A personal note.

Any recent articles on Relevancy22 between myself and ChatGPT from January to March of 2025 will feel distinctly different from the strictly theological discussion held below. That is because I have applied Whitehead's process philosophy and theology to the conceptual idea of creational freedom and freewill within a panpsychic panentheistic universe. However, there may be some value for readers in the article below which I here cite with my own personal reservations.

R.E. Slater

March 27, 2025

ps... in "The Spectrum Map of Open Theism" illustrated near the end of the article I would have to place Whiteheadian views of freewill to the radical far left as creation cannot be absent freewill. It is what fuels process thought. As example, from God comes agency; without God agency is simply causal affect without purposeful formation (process teleology). In creation the subject of love informs freewill which influences generative behavior or degenerative dissonance and disruption to Divine precedence and persuasion. - re slater

Suggested References:

Index - Process PanPsychic Panentheism  <-- primary source

Index - Process Teleology  <-- another excellent source

Index - Chatbot and I Discuss Everything  <-- a tertiary source

pss... Since beginning Relevancy22, the subject of Open Theism has shifted and morphed from the 1990s. More recently, during the first quarter of 2025, I have written more directionally about this subject from any number of significant perspectives. But to the unobservant, pew-taught Christian, the subject of agency is conflicted with the theology of sin. And yet, in (open and relational) process theology, human failure is not the driver of God's Story. Rather, cosmic/creational/human thriving becomes the centerpoint to all Christological themes bespeaking atoning resurrection. That love is the motif upon which all else flows and not the imbalanced Christianized ideations of sin and evil which sociological themes we see driving the maga-Christian and evangelical churches today. In a word, these modern-day cultic institutions have taken their eyes off Jesus and have placed their own wicked hearts upon the Cross making idols of themselves and their manmade religion focused solely on legalistic living. Consequently, the beauty and love of God is forgotten whenever the snake of man's soul is lifted up into the desert place of our landscapes. And unlike Moses' cruciform image lifted in the Wilderness to allay the toxins of the deadly desert serpent, maga cultists cannot save themselves nor the societies around their ungracious churches by fleshly efforts of self-atonement whether by dogma, apologetic or missional assimilation that all be like their miserable, errant religions. - res

What is Open Theism?

article link

What is Open Theism?

Open Theism has been called many things by many people. A leading critical webpage defines Open Theism as: “the teaching that God has granted to humanity free will and that in order for the free will to be truly free, the future free will choices of individuals cannot be known ahead of time by God.” Although this describes some philosophical conclusions of some Open Theists, it does not serve as a very good defining characteristic.

Another critical website claims Open Theism is: “the belief that God does not exercise meticulous control of the universe but leaves it “open” for humans to make significant choices (free will) that impact their relationships with God and others.” Although this definition is better, it still just breaks the surface of what the Open Theist movement entails.

The same site also lists the definition by a leading Open Theist, Pastor Bob Enyart of Denver Bible Church. Enyart states: “The future is open because God is free and God is creative. The settled view of God denies God’s own freedom and the ability to create, do something new, etc. God was, is and always will be free. God was, is and always will be a creative God.” This is really the heart of the matter. God is free to do as God pleases. God can write new songs, create new relationships, and even change the future. This is the God that the Bible depicts; a God eternally interacting with His creation, reacting and moving, living and creating, planning and accomplishing all His goals.

Open Theism is the Christian doctrine that the future is not closed but open because God is alive, eternally free, and inexhaustibly creative.

Furthermore, the Biblical Open Theism belief is that the Bible depicts God as God truly is. The God of the Bible is truly loving, powerful, righteous, faithful, vengeful, relational, and desperately beautiful. God raises up nations and destroys them (Isaiah 40:23). God is heartbroken by rebellion and exacts retribution (Genesis 6:6-7). God pleads with His people to return to Him and attempts everything He possibly can to make them love Him (Isaiah 5:4). God is nauseated by heinous sin (Jeremiah 19:5). God forgets His people’s sin for God’s own sake (Isaiah 43:25). God feels scorned and rejected when we abandon Him (Hosea 1:2).

But most of all, God is love (1 John 4:8). God so loved mankind that God made us in His image (Genesis 1:26). Imagine the God of the universe making lowly man into God’s own image! The picture is beautifully breathtaking. God created man for a love relationship! All God’s actions point to God’s love, even His vengeance. God desperately wants man to love Him and will go through extreme lengths to make it happen.

God describes Himself as relational and powerful. God can do everything; God can test people and learn that people love Him (Genesis 22:12), God can listen to new songs (songs WE(!) write for Him) (Psalms 33:3), and God can perform new creations (2 Corinthians 5:17). God even explains His relationship to mankind in the most loving way; God states that He will stop judgment against a nation if they repent (a judgment God “thought to bring upon” the nation)( Jeremiah 18:8). Amazing and righteous! God thinks He is going to destroy a nation, but repents based on human repentance. We see this wonderfully illustrated in Jonah, where the most wicked people on Earth repent and then God does not bring upon them “what He said He would bring upon them” (Jonah 3:10).

God so loved sinners that time and time again He laments about our unbelief. In fact God states that He tried so hard to save us that He expected(!) us to turn to God, but we did not (Jeremiah 3:7). In God’s infinite love, God has given us the ability to interact with Him, and the freedom to reject Him despite His best efforts! The God of the Bible responds to His creation.

Because God is righteous, God answers criticism. God answers the pagan king Abimelech when the king questions God (Genesis 20:4). God responds to critics. He does not ignore them as if their reasoning did not matter.

This is the God of the Bible. Open Theism claims that the Bible should not be ignored when it speaks about who God is and what God is like. The God of the Bible is truly loving, powerful, dangerous, faithful, vengeful, relational, and desperately beautiful. God is a complex, free, and wonderful person. God is hopelessly personal. That is the position of Open Theism.

Spectrum of Open Theism

It is important to distinguish between Christian open theists and non-Christian open theists. While open theism can refer to Muslims and other religions, it is primarily associated with Christianity. The most straightforward written method of distinguishing between the two is by capitalizing Open Theism when referring to the Christian subset. I am proposing that this standard is adopted as a norm.

Open Theism, then, would be the subgroup of all open theists that adhere to Christianity. This would not include Jewish, Muslim, Agnostic or even Process open theists.

Open Theism can be rightly understood as a spectrum of beliefs ranging from Philosophical Open Theism (Open Theism as derived from metaphysics) to Biblical Open Theism (Open Theism derived from Biblical descriptions of God’s acts and nature). Between these two poles range a wide variety of belief. To the extent that people use metaphysics (such as Perfect Being or Dignum Deo theology) as their metric to understanding the Bible, they move down the spectrum towards the Philosophical pole. To the extent that people use authorial intent (figuring out the concepts that the author was trying to communicate to his audience) as their metric, they move down the spectrum towards the Biblical pole.

Each pole has characteristic (but not absolute) attributes. Understanding the spectrum of thought will help Open Theists interact and critics to build accurate depictions of Open Theism.

A few items of note: Not all Open Theists embrace Omniscience and Perfect Being theology. Also, not all Open Theists embrace Biblical Inerrancy. Not all traditions of Open Theism flow from the same influences, and some influences for Open Theism are not compatible with certain Open Theists views. When critics cite Whitehead and Hartshorne as influences on Christianity, the entire Biblical side of the chart is more likely to have never heard these names before. It is a mistake to view Open Theism as a monolithic and strictly defined movement. Instead, it is better seen as a loose confederacy of divergent traditions and beliefs. Understanding this will allow Open Theists to better communicate and collaborate at common goals, the primary of which is to accurately describe the nature and character of God.

Reclaiming An Open Bible from Christian Closure

Reclaiming An Open Bible

from Christian Closure

by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT 4.0

In my last article I spoke to viewing the bible as a living place-marker narrating how the ancients thought of God in their times and eras. Today, I'd like to extend this motif to reflect on how a modern day society might use the bible towards relevant, biblical, societal growth and development.

To do this we will need to apply the liturgical idea of divine inspiration by stretching it away from the church's more typical attitudes of the bible as a magical totem that is fixed in time and spiritually untouchable... treating the holy writ much as the Ark of the Covenant was treated as a sacred object kept undefiled and revered in the days of the Tabernacle (Exodus 25.10-22). Rather, I view the bible as a tool to be used, banged up, and applied into the daily trenches of life. For if we do not use the bible it becomes meaningless and meaninglessly antequated in its ideas of God.

And though I am tempted to remove the bible altogether from the Christian faith-journey I cannot as it's place in the Christian journey is fundamental to the Christian faith. However, we can extend and expand moribund Christian theologies become staid, irrelevant, and long-in-the-tooth into today's metamodern societies fraught with global terpitude, fear, and unrest.

And so, when asking the question, "How should we redeem the bible from the Christian church?" Or, "How might we reclaim the bible from misleading Christian dogmas?" Let me first ask, what would your answer be? And after thinking upon this a bit, I will suggest my several insights into this unsettling question with the help of AI.

Of note, though I think of this post as a short essay piece it may seem too long for some. But with my apologies, my mind does not think in abbreviated essay articles. They require sufficient exposition if to be appropriately helpful. So please forgive me as Relevancy22 is not a "Daily Bread" kind of website but a teaching site meant for the pulpit, the classroom, and our falliable hearts.

Peace,

R.E. Slater

March 1, 2025

Recovering the Bible’s True Call

via Processual Application

"Keeping the Bible Open and Christian Faith Openly Relevant"

Hi. New subject. please read and respond to this quote which I am purposely placing out of context:

..."The Hebrew Bible has long since ceased being the traditions of one ancient people in one ancient place long ago. But, it still tells the story of one ancient people, in an ancient time and place. Its poetry is still the poetry of one ancient people; its prophecy still describes what did, would, and sometimes will happen to one ancient people. What could be less surprising, then, that audiences will identify with the ancient people who are the protagonists of their scripture on a figurative level–this is like the exodus, this is like David and Goliath, [this is like the end times]. And of course, too, the figurative has sometimes bled into the literal. And so, generation after generation, there have been those who imagine that maybe god’s chosen people, god’s sacred possession, the subject and object of biblical prophecy, are really here and now." - Anon

ChatGPT said:

This quote highlights the dynamic and evolving nature of the Hebrew Bible’s cultural and theological significance. It acknowledges how the text, originally rooted in a specific ancient time, place, and people, has transcended those historical and geographical boundaries to become a living and adaptable tradition for diverse audiences.

Key Themes in the Quote:

1. Historical Particularity vs. Universal Application

   • The Hebrew Bible originated as the sacred history of one people—ancient Israel.
   • However, its stories, poetry, and prophecy have been continuously reinterpreted by later cultures.
   • The text's original meaning is tied to Israel’s history, yet it resonates symbolically across time.

2. Figurative Identification vs. Literal Reappropriation

   • Readers across generations have seen their own struggles through the lens of biblical narratives (e.g., the Exodus as a symbol of liberation).
   • This figurative identification can enhance meaning but also risk distorting the text’s historical grounding when taken literally.
   • The transition from metaphor to theological exclusivism (e.g., “We are the true Israel”) has led to various claims of divine chosenness throughout history.

3. Continuity of Interpretation and Theological Implications

   • The Hebrew Bible has fueled competing religious and ideological claims.
   • Judaism, Christianity, and later movements have reinterpreted its prophecies and themes to fit new theological, political, and existential contexts.
   • The idea of “chosenness” has been particularly volatile—sparking both inclusivist spiritual applications and exclusivist nationalism.

Process-Oriented Reflection

From a process-theological perspective, the Hebrew Bible is not static but an ongoing, living tradition. Its meaning emerges relationally—shaped by historical context, communal interpretation, and dynamic theological evolution.

• If God is relational and evolving, then sacred texts also evolve in meaning.
• However, when figurative identification hardens into absolute claims, it can lead to rigid exclusivism or theological distortion.
• The question is not whether the Hebrew Bible’s stories remain relevant, but how they are reinterpreted responsibly in each generation.

Would you like to explore a specific historical instance of this phenomenon—such as early Christian reinterpretations, modern nationalist uses of the text, or theological debates on chosenness?

You said:

yes. let's do both. please keep your response short.

ChatGPT said:

1. Early Christian Reinterpretations

• Jesus as the Fulfillment of Hebrew Prophecy: Early Christians reinterpreted Hebrew Bible prophecies (e.g., Isaiah 53) as prefiguring Jesus, reframing Israel’s story into a universal redemptive narrative.
• Spiritualized Israel: Paul’s letters (e.g., Romans 9–11) expanded the idea of chosenness beyond ethnic Israel, leading to the Church as the “New Israel” (supersessionism).
• Apocalyptic Recasting: Books like Revelation reworked Hebrew prophetic imagery, applying it to Rome and early Christian struggles.

2. Modern Nationalist Uses

• Zionism: Jewish nationalism drew on biblical promises of land and restoration to justify modern Israel’s re-establishment (Theodor Herzl, 19th century).
• American Exceptionalism: The Puritans saw themselves as a “New Israel”, with America as a promised land (Manifest Destiny).
• Christian Nationalism: Some evangelical movements claim biblical prophecy applies to modern political events, particularly in relation to Israel and end-times theology.

Theological Reflection

• Figurative identification with the Hebrew Bible can inspire justice and renewal, but when taken literally or politically, it can fuel exclusivism and historical distortion.
• Process theology would advocate for contextual, open-ended engagement, avoiding rigid, triumphalist readings of chosenness.

Would you like to explore a specific case study within these movements?

You said:

yes

ChatGPT said:

Case Study: Christian Zionism and Biblical Prophecy in Modern Politics

One of the most influential modern reappropriations of the Hebrew Bible is Christian Zionism, a movement that interprets biblical prophecy as mandating political support for Israel. This movement blends figurative, theological, and literal readings of biblical texts, often with apocalyptic overtones.

---

1. Biblical Roots of Christian Zionism

Christian Zionists interpret key Hebrew Bible prophecies as predicting modern Israel’s establishment:

• Genesis 12:3 – “I will bless those who bless you.” → Applied to political support for Israel.
• Ezekiel 37 – The Valley of Dry Bones → Interpreted as Israel’s rebirth in 1948.
• Isaiah 66:8 – “Can a nation be born in a day?” → Linked to Israel’s nationhood.

New Testament texts reinforce this view:

• Romans 11:26 – “All Israel will be saved.” → Read as a future Jewish national conversion.
• Matthew 24:32-34 – The fig tree parable → Seen as Israel’s return signaling end times.

---

2. Political Manifestation

Christian Zionists, particularly American Evangelicals, push for:

• Unconditional U.S. support for Israel, believing it fulfills divine prophecy.
• Opposition to two-state solutions, since Israel’s land is seen as covenantally ordained.
• Rebuilding the Third Temple, which some believe will usher in the Second Coming.

Key Figures:

• John Nelson Darby (1800s) – Founder of dispensationalism, linking prophecy to modern Israel.
• Hal Lindsey (1970s) – The Late Great Planet Earth popularized end-times Zionism.
• John Hagee (Current) – Leads Christians United for Israel (CUFI), advocating Christian-Zionist policy.

---

3. Theological and Ethical Concerns

• Misuse of Biblical Prophecy: Ancient texts are applied directly to modern politics, ignoring historical and literary context.
• Exclusivist Nationalism: Christian Zionism favors Israel’s geopolitical goals over justice for Palestinians, creating theological justification for political conflict.
• Instrumentalizing Jewish Identity: Some Christian Zionists see Jews as mere players in an apocalyptic script, rather than respecting their faith on its own terms.

---

4. Process Theology’s Alternative Approach

• Recognizes historical context and avoids rigid, deterministic readings of prophecy.
• Views chosenness as relational rather than ethnically or politically exclusive.
• Promotes co-creative peacemaking, not apocalyptic fatalism.

---

Would you like to explore another case study or reflect on how this shapes global religious and political discourse today?

You said:

no. please expand on process' alternative approach...

ChatGPT said:

A Process-Theological Alternative to Christian Zionism and Prophetic Literalism

Process theology, rooted in Alfred North Whitehead’s philosophy, offers an alternative framework for engaging biblical prophecy, chosenness, and modern religious-political interpretations. Instead of deterministic or literalist readings, process thought emphasizes relationality, openness, and co-creative participation in God’s ongoing work.

---

1. The Nature of Biblical Prophecy in a Process Framework

Traditional Christian Zionism treats prophecy as a fixed blueprint—a foreordained sequence of divine actions. Process thought, however, sees prophecy as:

• A call to transformation, not a rigid script.
• Contextually bound yet adaptable to evolving human experiences.
• Shaped by human agency, where choices and ethical responses shape divine possibilities.

Process Interpretation of Key Prophecies

• Ezekiel 37 (Dry Bones & National Restoration) → Rather than a literal prediction of modern Israel, this is a vision of spiritual renewal, applicable to any people seeking renewal and justice.
• Isaiah 66:8 (A Nation Born in a Day) → In process thought, God is always bringing forth new possibilities, not necessarily predestining one national event.
• Romans 11:26 (“All Israel Will Be Saved”) → This is not an exclusive ethnic prophecy but a vision of expanding divine relationality across all peoples.

⮕ Prophecy is a dynamic, evolving process of God luring humanity toward justice, not a rigid cosmic calendar.

---

2. Chosenness as Relational, Not Exclusive

• Christian Zionism views chosenness as static—one group (Israel) is permanently set apart.
• Process theology sees chosenness as dynamic—any community that responds to divine lures toward justice, compassion, and creativity can be “chosen.”
• Biblical chosenness is ethical, not political. God’s calling is always toward justice and love, not dominance or geopolitical power.

⮕ Being chosen is about responsibility, not entitlement.

---

3. Theological Ethics of Land and Nationhood

Christian Zionism treats the land of Israel as divinely ordained, supporting militarized territorial claims. Process theology offers a relational alternative:

• Land is sacred in a co-creative sense—its sanctity comes from how it is shared and stewarded.
• God’s concern is for all people, not just one ethnic or national group.
• Justice must be mutual, recognizing the dignity of both Israelis and Palestinians.

⮕ The land is not a prize but a place of ethical relationship and shared flourishing.

---

4. An Open Future: Co-Creating God’s Will in History

• Christian Zionism assumes prophecy is inevitable.
• Process theology sees the future as open, shaped by human choices and divine persuasion.
• Peace is not predestined but cultivated through ethical action and relational healing.

Practical Process Commitments in Response to Christian Zionism

✔ Nonviolent engagement → Rejecting fatalistic end-times wars.

✔ Interfaith solidarity → Seeing Jews as partners, not mere instruments in a Christian eschatology.

✔ Justice-oriented prophecy → Prophecy calls us to act for peace, not wait for divine catastrophe.

---

5. Conclusion: The Hebrew Bible as an Open Invitation, Not a Closed System

A process-theological approach frees scripture from rigid political determinism and invites all people to engage with its vision dynamically. Instead of treating prophecy as a fixed endgame, it calls humanity to actively shape a more just, inclusive, and loving world—a world that is not bound by theological exclusivism, but open to divine novelty and shared responsibility.

⮕ Would you like to explore specific biblical texts through this lens or engage with practical theological applications today?

You said:

No. Instead let's refocus on God's ongoing inspirational call for redemption and forward movement towards reprise, reprieve, repentance, rebirth, and transformation as shown in Christ and to be relived in the life of the church.

ChatGPT said:

God’s Ongoing Inspirational Call: Redemption, Reprieve, Repentance, Rebirth, and Transformation in Christ and the Church

From a process-theological perspective, God’s call is not static or imposed but an ongoing, dynamic invitation—a continuous lure toward healing, transformation, and co-creative renewal. This call is fully embodied in Christ and continually relived in the life of the church, where each generation is invited into the work of redemption and forward movement.

---

1. Redemption as an Open Process, Not a Fixed Event

Traditional atonement theories often frame redemption as a one-time transaction, either penal substitution (Christ satisfying divine wrath) or ransom (Christ as a price paid). Process theology, however, sees redemption as:

• A continuing process rather than a singular moment in history.
• Relational and participatory, not mechanistic or judicial.
• Unfolding through Christ’s presence in history and the church’s response.

Christ’s work was not a closed, completed transaction but a decisive moment in an ever-expanding, divine-human journey of renewal.

⮕ Redemption is God’s continuous invitation to wholeness, both personal and communal.

---

2. Reprieve: Grace as Ongoing, Not Just Given Once

• God’s grace is not a one-time act of forgiveness but a constant flow of new possibilities.
• Christ offers reprieve—not just from guilt, but from brokenness, alienation, and destructive cycles.
• The church extends this reprieve, modeling God’s open-armed welcome.

Example in Christ:

• The woman caught in adultery (John 8:11)—Jesus does not condemn but calls her into a new future.
• The prodigal son (Luke 15)—The father never withdraws his love, always holding open the door of reprieve.

⮕ Grace is the continuous opening of new possibilities, always inviting return.

---

3. Repentance: Not Fear-Based, But Transformational

• Repentance (metanoia) is not just remorse but reorientation—turning toward God’s higher calling.
• The Spirit’s work is not coercive but persuasive, drawing individuals and communities into deeper love.
• The church’s mission is not to demand repentance from others but to embody it in its own life.

Example in Christ:

• Zacchaeus (Luke 19:1-10)—Jesus does not condemn his greed but draws him into transformative generosity.

⮕ Repentance is not about appeasement but alignment with God’s creative flow.

---

4. Rebirth: The Ever-Renewing Presence of Christ

• Christ is not only a historical figure but an ongoing presence, inviting the church into perpetual renewal.
• Baptism symbolizes rebirth into a new way of living, but this is not a one-time event—it is the rhythm of Christian life.
• Every moment contains the possibility of being born again into deeper love, justice, and creativity.

Example in Christ:

• Nicodemus (John 3)—Jesus speaks of being born again, not as a legal requirement but as an existential reality.

⮕ Rebirth is a continual unfolding of new life in response to divine love.

---

5. Transformation: The Church as an Instrument of Christ’s Renewing Work

• The church is not a static institution but a living organism constantly being reshaped by the Spirit.
• It is called to prophetic engagement, embodying the justice, mercy, and peacemaking of Christ.
• Transformation happens not through rigid dogma but through active participation in God’s unfolding work.

Example in Christ:

• The disciples on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35)—they do not recognize Jesus until they share in communion.
• The early church in Acts—constantly adapting, expanding, and being reformed by the Spirit.

⮕ The church must continually rediscover Christ’s presence, not assume it has already arrived.

---

Conclusion: Living God’s Call in an Open Future

God’s redemptive call is not a static plan but a creative, ongoing invitation. In Christ, we see the full embodiment of divine love, but his work is not finished—it is to be carried forward in the life of the church.

• Redemption is an ongoing unfolding of healing.
• Reprieve is the never-ending flow of grace.
• Repentance is an open invitation to realignment.
• Rebirth is the Spirit’s constant renewal.
• Transformation is the church’s role in shaping God’s future.

⮕ The call of Christ is not to wait for the kingdom but to co-create it, step by step, in love, justice, and radical hospitality.

Would you like to explore how this applies to the church’s role today, or focus on a specific theological or scriptural dimension?

You said:

Thus and thus, it is not necessary to replace the bible or shutter the bible to dusty book bins but to processually expand its Christological themes and motifs while critically understanding that the presence and work of God is at all times restlessly interactive with creation....

ChatGPT said:

Yes, precisely! The Bible need not be discarded or sidelined, nor should it be rigidly fossilized into a static doctrinal system. Instead, its Christological themes and motifs should be processually expanded, allowing for their continual unfolding within history, culture, and human experience.

The presence and work of God is not locked in the past but is restlessly interactive with creation, always calling, inviting, and luring toward deeper expressions of love, justice, renewal, and co-creative becoming.

Thus, rather than treating Scripture as a closed, completed artifact, we should:

• Engage it dynamically, seeing how its themes evolve in history.
• Expand its Christological motifs, not as rigid theological constructs but as living invitations.
• Recognize God’s restless, ongoing activity, always luring creation forward into greater harmony.

This approach keeps faith alive, allowing for responsible theological evolution while remaining deeply anchored in Christ’s transformative call.

Would you like to explore specific biblical themes that could be expanded processually, or are you interested in a broader reflection on how the church can embody this interactive vision today?

You said:

...though the thematic structure of divine lure and call seems naturally recognizable many lose these motifs within the more fallen motifs of wrath, judgment, ritualism, legalism, and ascetism. So let's present God's loving presence and call over against man's innate religiousity to profane this same divine lure...

ChatGPT said:

God’s Loving Presence and Call vs. Humanity’s Tendency to Profane the Divine Lure

Throughout history, the divine call has been restlessly present—a continuous lure toward love, justice, and transformation. Yet, humanity often misconstrues, obstructs, or profanes this call, replacing it with wrath, judgment, ritualism, legalism, and asceticism. This is not because God changes, but because humans repeatedly distort the divine invitation through the lens of fear, power, and control.

Thus, we must set God’s loving lure and call over against humanity’s religious distortions, recovering the Christological motifs of grace, renewal, and relational becoming.

---

1. God’s Lure: Love, Invitation, and Transformation

God’s presence is not coercive or punitive but persuasive and relational. Instead of wrath-driven demands, God’s call is one of divine invitation—an open-ended, creative lure toward wholeness.

• Genesis 3:9 – “Where are you?” → God calls, not to punish, but to restore relationship after the Fall.
• Exodus 3:12 – “I will be with you.” → God lures Moses not with wrath but with presence and partnership.
• John 1:14 – “The Word became flesh and dwelled among us.” → The incarnation itself is God’s embodied lure toward love.

⮕ God’s nature is not primarily judgment but relationally transformative love.

---

2. Humanity’s Profaning of the Divine Call

Instead of embracing the divine lure, humanity often corrupts or resists it, turning it into rigid structures that serve human interests.

A. Wrath and Judgment: Turning Love into Fear

• God’s justice is restorative, not retributive, yet many religious traditions focus on divine wrath over love.
• Christ overturns wrath-based theology, revealing a God who forgives even from the cross (Luke 23:34).
• Process Alternative: Judgment is not condemnation but a lure toward self-awareness and transformation (Isaiah 1:18).

⮕ God’s call invites healing, but human religion often distorts it into threats of fear.

B. Ritualism: From Relationship to Empty Forms

• Ancient Israelite prophets condemned mechanical sacrifices (Isaiah 1:11-17, Amos 5:21-24), insisting that justice, mercy, and faithfulness matter more than ritual compliance.
• Jesus confronts pharisaic legalism, saying, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27).
• Process Alternative: Ritual is good when it sustains life, but when it becomes an idol, it profanes God’s call.

⮕ God calls humanity into loving relationship, yet human systems often reduce faith to mechanical acts.

C. Legalism: The Burden of Religion Over the Freedom of Grace

• The Torah’s laws were meant to shape ethical community, but over time, they became burdensome regulations.
• Paul critiques this, stating, “The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life” (2 Corinthians 3:6).
• Process Alternative: True law is not static but dynamic, unfolding relationally with God’s ever-present lure.

⮕ Law should serve love; love should not be sacrificed to uphold law.

D. Asceticism: Denying Creation Rather Than Embracing It

• Some traditions teach detachment from the world as the highest good, yet Jesus embraced the fullness of life, celebrating feasts, friendship, and presence.
• John 10:10 – “I have come that they may have life, and have it abundantly.”
• Process Alternative: The world is not to be rejected but transformed in God’s ongoing co-creation.

⮕ God’s lure is toward full participation in life, not retreat from it.

---

3. Christ as the Living Lure: Reclaiming God’s Call from Religious Profanation

The life, death, and resurrection of Christ is the ultimate divine corrective to human distortions of God’s call.

• Christ subverts wrath by revealing a God who suffers with humanity (Philippians 2:6-8).
• Christ rejects dead ritualism, embodying compassion over sacrifice (Matthew 9:13).
• Christ opposes legalism, teaching that love fulfills the law (Matthew 22:37-40).
• Christ lives fully, showing that creation is meant for flourishing (Luke 7:34).

⮕ In Christ, the divine lure is revealed not as force, but as invitation; not as law, but as grace; not as condemnation, but as transformation.

---

4. The Church’s Role: Carrying the Lure Forward

If Christ embodies the divine call, then the church is meant to live it out—not as a fortress of exclusion, but as an open-ended process of God’s ongoing work.

• The church must resist wrath-based theology, embodying grace and inclusion.
• It must move beyond ritualism, focusing on justice and love.
• It must reject legalistic rigidity, adapting creatively to new realities.
• It must embrace life fully, honoring God’s creation as good.

⮕ The church must be a living expression of God’s relentless call toward love, justice, and transformation.

---

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Divine Lure in an Age of Religious Distortion

God’s presence is always active, always inviting, always luring toward something deeper. Yet humanity’s tendency is to harden this call into structures that resist transformation. Christ restores the divine lure, calling us beyond fear, rigidity, and legalism into co-creative love and renewal.

Thus, the Bible is not to be replaced or discarded, but expanded and deepened—not as a system of fixed laws, but as a living narrative of divine call and response, ever-unfolding in history.

⮕ Would you like to explore how this applies to today’s church or a specific theological issue?

You said:

You're summary treatment is more than sufficient. Let's leave it to the reader as to how to apply the bible's processual themes and motifs of enacting, involving love.

ChatGPT said:

That is a wise and fitting conclusion. The Bible’s processual themes and motifs—its call to enacting, involving love—are best left open for each reader, each community, each generation to explore, embody, and extend. The divine lure is not a blueprint but an invitation, ever calling creation forward into grace, renewal, and transformation.

Let us then leave the door open, trusting that God’s restless, loving presence will continue to inspire, persuade, and unfold new possibilities in the hearts and lives of those who seek.

Thank you for this rich and meaningful discussion! Until next time.

You said:

Thank you again. This dialogue has been very helpful. Please save under the title, "How to Redeem the Bible from Misleading Christian Teachings." ... that is, unless you can suggest similarly abbreviated titles which may be more on the nose.

ChatGPT said:

You're very welcome! I'm glad this dialogue has been helpful. Here are a few alternative, more on-the-nose titles you might consider:

• "Redeeming the Bible from Distorted Christian Teachings"
• "Rescuing the Bible from Religious Misuse"
• "Recovering the Bible’s True Call"
• "The Bible Beyond Fear, Legalism, and Judgment"
• "Reclaiming the Bible’s Processual Vision"

If you still prefer "How to Redeem the Bible from Misleading Christian Teachings," I’ll go ahead and save it under that title. Let me know your choice!

You said:

Yes, let's save it under my own named heading. But thank you. Bye!

ChatGPT said:

Got it! The discussion is saved under your chosen title. Thanks again for the thoughtful dialogue—until next time! Take care. 😊