A Comparison between de Chardin and
Whitehead's Structural Frameworks
PART 4
by R.E. Slater and ChatGPT
March 31, 2025
METAPHYSICS
Teilhard de Chardin:
- Reality evolves upward, driven by an inner principle of convergence.
- This principle is spiritual energy, which draws all things toward unity in God.
- Evolution is meaningful and directional because it ends in Christic fulfillment.
Whitehead:
- Reality is an organic process of becoming, not linear or convergent.
- Each actual occasion includes the past (via prehension), novelty, and a subjective aim toward intensity or value.
- The universe has a teleology of creativity, but not a fixed endpoint.
ONTOLOGY
Teilhard de Chardin:
- Ontology is hierarchical and teleological—moving from matter to life to thought to spirit.
- Emphasizes substance ontology evolving toward higher complexity and consciousness.
- The “within” of things (interiority or consciousness) deepens as complexity increases.
- Everything is converging toward a final unity: the Omega Point, which is both a metaphysical destiny and identified with the Cosmic Christ.
Whitehead:
- Ontology is based on actual occasions or drops of experience—not substances, but processes.
- The cosmos is a pluriverse of events related through prehension (experience), not a single convergent destiny.
- Reality is relational, internally complex, and indeterminately unfolding.
- God is not the terminus of evolution but the lure toward creative transformation.
THEOLOGY AND COSMOLOGY
Teilhard de Chardin:
- Deeply rooted in Christian eschatology.
- God = Omega Point, pulling creation forward.
- The noosphere (realm of thought/consciousness) emerges as a higher level over the biosphere.
- Christ is cosmic: the meaning and culmination of the universe.
Whitehead:
- God has two natures: primordial (envisioning all potentiality) and consequent (feeling and responding to the actual world).
- God is not beyond time, but in time—interacting with the world through persuasive love.
- No predetermined “end” or Omega Point—creativity itself is the ultimate metaphysical principle.
INTERPRETIVE COMMENTARY
While Teilhard believes in convergence, unity, and a preordained cosmic goal his [Christian] metaphysic is infused with hopeful mysticism and a [Christ-centered] salvific trajectory.
Whitehead, while spiritual [cf. panpsychic panentheism] is open-ended. The cosmos is not guaranteed a perfect end yet each moment matters as it drives towards a complex web of ongoing co-creation. He gives every entity value [cf. Whitehead's process of axiology = ethics and morality], not because it reaches an endpoint, but because it exists in relation and potential to the cosmos' overall evolutionary design = cosmic teleology [to the God of the universe and the Christ of theology: sic, Process Theology]
SUMMARY THOUGHTS
Teilhard gives us a vision of evolutionary ascent, grounded in unity, love, and divine destiny while Whitehead gives us a framework for valuing each event of becoming as it relates, feels, and contributes to the beauty of the whole.
In many ways both de Chardin and Whitehead have contributed to one another's overall dynamic schema of processual becoming: de Chardin's theology concentrates on a Christian emphasis to Whitehead's more philosophic emphasis that is infused with salvific Christian ideology.
In de Chardin we find a theological emphasis than we do a philosophical structure and in Whitehead we find a mature philosophical rigor from which a mature processual theology can arise which can elevate all global religions from there metaphysics to their axiological outcomes of love and justice.
Consequently, Whitehead's structure then is more pervasive and missional than de Chardin's Christian-only emphasis.
No comments:
Post a Comment