 |
| Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT |
 |
| Illustration by R.E. Slater & ChatGPT |
PART I
- Humanity’s first experiences of spirit through natural phenomena.
- The world as an animate field of agency and intention.
- From cave art to shamanic ritual - consciousness awakening to cosmos.
- Panpsychism before philosophy: everything participates in the sacred.
Essay 2 - From Tribe to Totem: Symbol, Art, and Early Cults
- The totem as both social bond and spiritual emblem.
- The emergence of sacrifice as communion, not appeasement.
- Proto-religion as the art of relationship with life-forces.
- Worship as aesthetic participation in nature’s vitality.
Stone Age Periods
| Period | Typical Date Range (BCE) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lower Paleolithic | 2,600,000 – 300,000 | Earliest stone tool use. |
| Middle Paleolithic | 300,000 – 40,000 | Associated with Neanderthals and early Homo sapiens. |
| Upper Paleolithic | 50,000 – 10,000 | Modern human flourishing; art, symbolic culture. |
| • Aurignacian | 40,000 – 30,000 | Early figurative art, blades, ornaments. |
| • Gravettian | 30,000 – 20,000 | Venus figurines; advanced hunting strategies. |
| • Solutrean | 22,000 – 17,000 | Sophisticated flint knapping. |
| • Magdalenian | 17,000 – 10,000 | Bone/antler tools; Lascaux cave art. |
| Mesolithic | 10,000 – 8,000 | Transition to agriculture; microlithic tools. |
| Neolithic | c. 10,000 – 3,000 (Near East) | Farming, pottery, permanent settlements. |
Metal Ages
| Period | Typical Date Range (BCE) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Copper Age (Chalcolithic) | 4500 – 3300 | First metal tools appear; transitional era. |
| Early Bronze Age | 3300 – 2000 | Development of bronze metallurgy; early states. |
| Middle Bronze Age | 2000 – 1600 | Urban expansion; Amorite kingdoms. |
| Late Bronze Age | 1600 – 1200 | International empires; ends with Bronze Age Collapse. |
| Iron Age | 1200 – 800 (start) | Widespread adoption of iron technology; rise of Israel/Judah, Neo-Assyrian power, Greek Dark Age recovery. |
Before humanity built temples, it built fires.Before it named gods, it named the stars.Before it wrote, it listened.
I. Humanity’s First Experiences of Spirit through Natural Phenomena
The Blombos Cave (used some 100,000-72,000 years ago) provides some of the earliest evidence that humans were creating symbolic, ritual, and relational meaning - the very building blocks of sacred consciousness we know as religion today.
Blombos showed that early (modern) humans saw the world as more than utilitarian, to be used for food and shelter. That early man was engaging with the world as they knew it then symbolically, aesthetically, and relationally. As example, through maturing forms of sacred animism, which was the belief that spirits or souls inhabited all things. In this way, early humans believed the cosmos was spiritually alive.
This was evidenced when clans and tribes began to move towards "totems,," or "sacred symbols," to represent their feelings of their "interiorly felt, external experience." Hence, beads, pigments, and geometric markings, become the earliest "totemic" identifiers (precursors to) clan symbols and sacred emblems of an revered ancestor, a passed clan member or child, a sacred protector, or even spirit guide.
From these personal and communal experiences emerged the clan shaman - the one who could interpret the visible and invisible for wondrous, trembling, grieving, or broken hearts; guide hunters seeking sustenance; and assist those in need of healing, balance, foresight, or cohesion. Acting as the human intermediary with the spirit world, the shaman diagnosed illness, restored harmony, recovered the lost, and strengthened social bonds through rituals that united the clan or tribe more deeply with one another and with the world around them.
Shamanism thus served as a psycho-sociological religious function for processing "meaningful" connections to individuals seeking inner wisdom and purpose in many of life's daunting challenges. They were the sacred intermediaries to the spirit world. And it was in the Blombos Cave where paleoanthropologists came to the moment of realization that the artifacts they were digging up represented early humanity's religious awakenings.
[Side Note: What modern philosophy describes as panpsychism - the view that consciousness or experiential capacity pervades the cosmos down to its most fundamental elements - is not far removed from what early humanity intuited. In this framework, humans are not uniquely singular bearers of awareness but participants within a larger, living field of consciousness that is dynamically present throughout the world.]
II. The World as an Animate Field of Agency and Intention
In the early evolution of human cognition, long before conceptual distinctions such as “natural” and “supernatural” existed, the environment was experienced as inherently alive. For Paleolithic and early Mesolithic peoples (2.6 million to 45,000 BCE), the world was not a neutral, unresponsive backdrop, but a dynamic and responsive field in which forces acted with discernible patterns, intentions, and effects. Contemporary anthropology often labels this perception (sacred) “animism,” but such terminology risks oversimplifying a complex and continually adaptive (animated) ontology. What emerged among early hominins was a mode of interpreting reality in which agency, interiority, and responsiveness were attributed to the phenomena that sustained or threatened life.
Mountains, trees, rivers, animals, and stars were not conceived as inert objects. They were experienced as actors within a web of reciprocal becoming. Such attributions were not the result of superstition but arose from a deeply embodied or "felt" cognition that felt important and had somehow been related to lived experience: that survival depended on reading subtle environmental cues, anticipating shifts in weather or animal behavior, and integrating sensory information into meaningful patterns. As scholars like Stewart Guthrie and Pascal Boyer have argued, the human mind evolved with a cognitive bias toward detecting agency - a bias that, in the Paleolithic context, was adaptive rather than erroneous. When the cost of ignoring a potential agent exceeded the cost of mistakenly assuming one, the world became intelligible as a network of competing interacting presences.
Spirit, therefore, was not a separate category of being. It was an interpretive posture embedded in the earliest strata of human awareness - an intuitive recognition that the forces shaping existence possessed qualities analogous to intention, mood, or responsiveness. Early humans did not worship the wind as if it were divine; they encountered divinity through the experience of the wind. Each gust that bent the treetops, each whisper of grass, each violent storm, was not merely physical movement but a relational event. Environmental forces were experienced as conveying information, expressing mood, or communicating danger. For Paleolithic peoples, events did not simply occur; they occurred to someone.
Modern cognitive science might describe this as the operation of early “agency-detection systems,” but such language captures only the mechanistic substrate, not the experiential world it generated. For hominins between 2.5 million and 45,000 BCE - from Homo habilis and Homo erectus to Denisovans and Neanderthals to early Homo sapiens - the wind possessed qualities that contemporary humans would reserve for social agents. It revealed, concealed, pushed, resisted, startled, or comforted. These were not metaphors but perceptual realities grounded in survival-based cognition.
And so, in the absence of symbolic theology or metaphysical abstraction, such experiences formed a preconceptual religious grammar. The world was not divided into material and spiritual realms; it was a single, continuously interacting matrix of forces whose meanings were apprehended directly through sensation, emotion, and embodied interpretation. To feel the wind was to participate in a broader field of animated life. Listening to it constituted a form of spiritual attunement - a sensing of patterns, signals, and presences. Divinity, if such a term can be retroactively applied, was not imagined behind the phenomenon but encountered within it.
In this sense, the wind became one of humanity’s earliest teachers of sacred perception. It revealed that the world was not silent matter but an active interlocutor. The earliest religious intuitions were not speculative doctrines but relational experiences - the recognition, at a prelinguistic level, that human consciousness existed within a larger matrix of agency and meaning. Such encounters laid the groundwork for the later development of myth, ritual, and symbolic cosmology, even though none of these were yet articulated. The Paleolithic world was already thick with sacred-significance - a world that co-shaped human cognition as much as humans interpreted it.
This, then, was the world of an emerging - but not yet codified - proto-religious language, as human consciousness slowly awakened to a relational cosmos and began expressing that awareness through symbol, gesture, and early communal practice.
III. From Cave Art to Shamanic Ritual - Consciousness Awakening to Cosmos
The emergence of Paleolithic art marks a decisive shift in human cognitive evolution: the movement from immediate encounter with the world to expressive representation of it. What appears in the Upper Paleolithic caves of Lascaux, Altamira, and Chauvet (c. 35,000–20,000 BCE) is not mere decoration but the earliest known externalization of symbolic thought. These images - bison, horses, lions, and hybrid figures - constitute a visual grammar through which early Homo sapiens translated sensory experience into shared meaning.
Archaeologists increasingly interpret these sites not as living spaces but as ritual environments. The placement of images deep within cave systems, their layered repainting over generations, and their association with ochre, torches, and resonant acoustics indicate that they functioned as settings for structured communal experience. Rather than representing animals in a strictly naturalistic sense, the paintings appear to mediate relationships between seen and unseen forces - between hunter and hunted, life and death, the present and the ancestral. They are best understood as presences rather than simple depictions, signaling a worldview in which symbolic form and sacred perception were inseparable to the ancient mind.
From this symbolic sphere emerges the figure often described in anthropological literature as the shaman. Although the term is borrowed from much later Siberian cultures, the role it denotes - a ritual specialist who mediates between ordinary and altered states of consciousness - has analogues throughout prehistoric contexts. Through rhythmic sound, controlled breathing, sensory deprivation, and trance-inducing movement, these individuals facilitated communal access to forms of experience that exceeded the boundaries of ordinary perception. They served as interpreters of dream, illness, animal movement, weather patterns, and death - functions that, taken together, positioned them as early custodians of cosmological understanding.
This ritual mediation is not limited to European cave complexes. Across the Near Eastern and proto-Semitic zones - from the early layers of Jericho (c. 9000 BCE) to the monumental enclosures of Göbekli Tepe in southeastern Anatolia (c. 9500–8000 BCE) - we see the development of architectural spaces that formalize sacred experience. Göbekli Tepe’s T-shaped pillars, carved with animals, abstract symbols, and celestial motifs, suggest a society that had already conceptualized a structured relationship between humans, animals, and the wider cosmos. These sacred enclosures functioned less as “temples” in the later sense and more as cosmic axes - ritual sites that oriented human communities within a meaningful universe. [Refer to the Addendum section below for detailed explanation]
Taken together, the cave and the shrine, the drum and the carved stone, indicate that early humans were developing multi-sensory languages of transcendence - methods for modulating perception, intensifying emotion, and organizing communal insight. These practices reveal a growing awareness that human life was embedded within a larger, relational field of forces. In contemporary philosophical terms, such engagements reflect what process thought later calls prehension: the reciprocal influence of each entity upon every other, the felt relation that binds experience into coherent worlds.
Thus, by the late Paleolithic (formerly known as the Old Stone Age which extended from 50,000/40,000 to 10,000 BCE) down through the Mesolithic/Epipaleolithic (10,000-8,000 BCE) to the Early Neolithic (9,000 BCE in the Near East; and as late as 4,000 BCE in Northern Europe) periods, Homo sapiens were not merely adapting to their climatically challenging environment but interpreting, symbolizing, and ritualizing it. The cosmos was not simply external scenery; it was a shared and responsive mind-world in which humans participated (as if ghosts on the landscape) in physical/other-worldly encounters where everything had a voice, a will, a form, and meaning in life. And it was through ritual expression, symbolic art, and shamanic trance-mediation, etc., that the human consciousness was newly awakening to its own psychic-relational (or spiritual-religious) depth - to the possibility that meaning did not simply arise from within the human mind, but was being co-constructed with the world that held it.
IV. Panpsychism before Philosophy - Everything Participates in the Sacred
By the time human communities reached the threshold of the Early Neolithic in the Levant and Mesopotamian regions, roughly 9,000 BCE, the evolving world was already interpreted as a living field of relational activity - a cosmos in which every entity, force, and phenomenon was understood to possess interiority. Long before “panpsychism” became a philosophical term, its intuition was the operative ontology of early Homo sapiens.
Across Paleolithic and Mesolithic cultures, being itself was inseparable from experiencing. To exist was to feel; to act was to respond; to appear was to signify. The world was not inert substrate but sensate process. Stones remembered, rivers murmured, flames danced with intention, and stars gazed back as watchful presences. The boundary that later Enlightened metaphysics would draw between “mind” and “matter” had no conceptual purchase here.
This is often mislabeled anthropomorphism, but the logic runs in the opposite direction. Early humans were not projecting human consciousness onto the world; rather, they perceived their own interiority as continuous with the world’s interiority. This worldview might better be named cosmomorphism - the recognition that human sentience is one local expression of a much broader tapestry of awareness woven through the cosmos [I am here illustrating how a processual metaphysic would re-weave earlier expressed non-processual ideas].
In such a world, death was not annihilation but transition. The dead did not vanish; they entered new relational modes - manifest in the whisper of wind through a crevice, the echo within a limestone chamber, the visitation of a dream, or a butterfly dancing across a field into a naturalized bridal ceremony of loved ones. Ancestral presence remained a structural feature of a relational world. In a word, our ancient paleo-forefathers in the clans and tribes, before entering into displaced, perhaps superstitious/folkloric, neolithic cities, were close to nature and to nature's many sensory displays.
As African and Eurasian populations (re-)settled into proto-Semitic zones of the Near East (c. 8000–5000 BCE), these long-standing animistic + shamanistic intuitions were accumulating into more coherent symbolic-religious grammars. Fertility cults, seasonal rites, and mythic narratives of order and reciprocity emerged not as replacements for animism but as its formalization - that is, a systematizing of the already-perceived mutual sacred+participation between humans, animals, landforms, and celestial cycles.
This is visible in the cosmologies of:
-
Pre-Sumerian and Sumerian religion, with its vibrant pantheon of natural forces personified;
-
Akkadian and Babylonian myth, where divine agency maintains cosmic equilibrium;
-
Canaanite and early Levantine traditions, in which Baal, Asherah, El, Shapash, and others articulate a world of relational vitality.
What changed was not the underlying ontology - still relational, vital, participatory - but the scale and structure of its expression. Animism expanded into polytheism; local spirits became gods; distributed agencies became theophanies. Yet beneath every later evolving theology lied the original worldview: the cosmos was a web of living agencies, co-creating reality in every moment, with humanity; and humanity, with it.
Thus the prehistoric world, far from being simplistic or naïve, intuitively and experientially articulated the foundational insight that process philosophy would later formalize:
-
that existence is felt experience,
-
that to be, to exist, is to relate, and
-
that metaphysic reality is the ongoing conversation between the many and the one (re cosmic panpsychism or processual cosmic consciousness)
In this sense, Paleolithic and Mesolithic religious perception anticipates the metaphysical vision of Whitehead: a cosmos in which all actualities feel, respond, and contribute to the unfolding of the whole.
And it is here, in Section IV, we have come to the heart of the bridge between:- prehistoric consciousness,
- proto-religious experience, and
- process cosmology’s metaphysical depth.
Coda - Remembering the Living World
To revisit the animistic horizon of the paleo-world is not to regress into primitive belief but to recover a mode of perception that modernity has rendered dormant. Early Homo species were not “wrong” in sensing the sacred everywhere; they were perceptive enough to recognize the depth of their relational embeddedness in the cosmos.
Their awe before flame and storm; their gratitude for soil and sun; their reverence for birth and mourning - these were not superstitions but expressions of a wisdom grounded in existential intimacy with the world. Theirs was a consciousness alert to the aliveness of everything, a consciousness attuned to subtle presences modern life has taught us to overlook.
- Part I - Foundations: The Birth of the Sacred
- Essay 1 - Animism and the Living Cosmos
- Essay 2 - From Tribe to Totem
- Part II - The Age of Gods
- Essay 3 - The Mesopotamian Fertile Crescent
- Essay 4 - Egypt, Indus, and Minoa Sacred Cultures
- Essay 5 - From Polytheism to Henotheism
- Part III - Axial Awakenings
- Essay 6 - Ancient Israel, Persia, and Monotheism
- Essay 7 - India
- Essay 8 - Greece and the Birth of Reason
- Part IV - The Sacred Made Universal
- Essay 9 - The Age of Universal Religions
- Essay 10 - Modernity and the Eclipse of the Sacred
- Essay 11 - The Rebirth of the Sacred
- Part V - Supplementary Materials
- I - The Ancient History of Mesopotamia
- II - The History of Language in Ancient Mesopotamia
- III - The Ancient History of the Hebrew Language
- IV(A-C) How the Ancient Near East Gave Shape to Israel's God
- Why the ANE is Essential for Israel's Received Theology (I-II)
- Affecting Cultic Syncretism Across the Ancient Near East (III-V)
- Cultural Identity Formation & the Rejection of Syncretism (VI-IX)
- V (A-C) The History & Compilation of the Hebrew Bible
- From Oral Memory to Proto-Canon (I-II)
- Exile, Redaction, and the Birth of Scripture (III)
- Second Temple Scribalization to Canonization (IV-V)
- VI - The Unhelpful Oxymorons of "Biblical Authority" & "Inerrancy"
- VII - The Evolution of Inerrancy: From Ancient Plurality to Modern Certainty
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Foundational texts for understanding symbolic emergence, ritual behavior, cognitive evolution, and early sacred consciousness.
Core Works-
David Lewis-Williams — The Mind in the Cave
Cognitive archaeology of cave art, altered states, and the origins of ritual behavior. -
Ian Tattersall — Becoming Human
A clear account of the evolution of symbolic thought in Homo sapiens. -
Pascal Boyer — Religion Explained
A foundational study in cognitive-evolutionary approaches to the formation of belief. -
Harvey Whitehouse — Modes of Religiosity
Explores how ritual modes, memory, and social cohesion shaped early religious forms. -
Mircea Eliade — The Sacred and the Profane
A classic phenomenology of early sacred experience and spatial symbolism.
Symbolic Behavior and Cognitive Evolution
-
André Leroi-Gourhan — Gesture and Speech
Foundational research on Paleolithic symbolic behavior, tool use, and the emergence of expressive capacity. -
Colin Renfrew — Prehistory: The Making of the Human Mind
Renfrew’s “cognitive archaeology” complements Lewis-Williams, expanding the study of symbolic emergence and ritual development. -
Steven Mithen — The Prehistory of the Mind
Seminal analysis of modular cognition and how religion evolves from cognitive fluidity. -
Terrence Deacon — The Symbolic Species
Highly relevant to Sections III & IV: explains why language, meaning, and symbolic behavior emerge as uniquely human traits.
Evolution of Religion and Social Imagination
-
Robert Bellah — Religion in Human Evolution
A sweeping evolutionary account from archaic societies to axial transformations; deeply aligned with this project’s long-view developmental arc. -
Agustín Fuentes — The Creative Spark
Explores symbolic co-creation and imagination in Paleolithic communities — ideal for bridging toward a process-relational world. -
David Graeber & David Wengrow — The Dawn of Everything
Reframes long-held assumptions about early human social and political structures; valuable for understanding ritual variability and the plurality of developmental pathways.
Part II - Foundations & The Age of Gods
Studies detailing how early Afro-Asiatic cultures, proto-Canaanites, and Mesopotamians shaped the symbolic and ritual structures later inherited by Israel and Judah.
Core Works
-
John Day — Yahweh and the Gods and Goddesses of Canaan
A definitive comparison of Canaanite deities and early Israelite religion, clarifying the polytheistic matrix from which Yahwism emerged. -
Mark S. Smith — The Early History of God; The Origins of Biblical Monotheism
Foundational studies on Israel’s religious evolution, the divine council, and the transition from polytheism/henotheism to emergent monotheism. -
Francesca Stavrakopoulou — Land of Our Fathers
Examines Israelite ancestor veneration, territorial cults, and the bodily logic of ancient belief. -
Othmar Keel — The Symbolism of the Biblical World
A visual and iconographic guide to Near Eastern religious imagery that shaped biblical language.
Recommended Scholarly Additions
-
Daniel E. Fleming — The Legacy of Israel in Judah’s Bible
A crucial reconstruction of Israelite and Canaanite religious interpenetration and the early diversity of Yahwism. -
Karel van der Toorn — Family Religion in Babylonia, Syria, and Israel
The authoritative study of household cults, figurines, and ancestral ritual—indispensable for understanding non-elite religion. -
Joan Goodnick Westenholz — Legends of the Kings of Akkade
Illuminates Mesopotamian royal mythology and its influence on later Near Eastern traditions. -
Benjamin Sommer — The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel
Explores divine embodiment and fluid identity, central to reconstructing pre-exilic Israelite theology. -
Tremper Longman III — Fictional Akkadian Literature
Essential for comparing Akkadian literary forms with biblical narrative structures. -
Stephanie Dalley — Myths from Mesopotamia
Authoritative translations of creation, flood, and divine conflict myths foundational to the ancient Near Eastern worldview. -
Thorkild Jacobsen — The Treasures of Darkness
A classic synthetic history of Mesopotamian religion, myth, and ritual mentality. -
Jean Bottéro — Religion in Ancient Mesopotamia
A concise and elegant introduction to Mesopotamian religious imagination and ritual expression. -
Tryggve Mettinger — The Dethronement of Sabaoth; No Graven Image?
Key studies on the move toward aniconism and Israel’s conceptual shift in divine representation.
Optional but Highly Valuable
-
Guy Stroumsa — The Invention of Religion in the Ancient Near East
Examines the evolution from domestic cults to temple-centered religion; excellent for understanding religious “complexification.” -
Thomas Römer — The Invention of God
A modern historical reconstruction of Yahweh’s origins within the larger Levantine pantheon.
ADDENDUM
1. TABLE OF ANATOLIAN RITUAL SITES
Table 1: Chronology of Anatolian Ritual Sites (200,000 - 7,000 BCE)
| Site | Location | Date Range | Ritual / Symbolic Features | Significance for Religious Evolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karain Cave | Antalya | 200,000 BCE → 10,000 BCE | Burials, pigment use, symbolic items | Longest ritual continuity in Anatolia; establishes deep Paleolithic sacred behaviors |
| Üçağızlı Cave | Hatay | 45,000–30,000 BCE | Ornaments, pierced shells, ochre | Early symbolic adornment; emergence of mediated identity markers |
| Öküzini Cave | Antalya | 20,000–10,000 BCE | Painted pebbles, ritual hearths | Early evidence of symbolic abstraction and fire-based ritual spaces |
| Pınarbaşı (Konya Plain) | Central Anatolia | 13,000–9,000 BCE | Ritualized burials, feasting | Pre-agricultural communal ritual gatherings |
| Karahan Tepe (Taş Tepeler) | Şanlıurfa | c. 11,500–10,500 BCE | T-pillars, human heads, animal reliefs | Older sibling site to Göbekli Tepe; advanced ritual architecture |
| Göbekli Tepe (Layer III) | Şanlıurfa | c. 9,600–8,800 BCE | Megalithic enclosures, carved fauna, celestial motifs | Earliest monumental ritual complex; world’s first evidence of “temple culture” |
| Nevalı Çori | Euphrates Basin | 9,000–8,200 BCE | Cult building, anthropomorphic statues | Transitional ritual community linking PPNA → PPNB |
| Çatalhöyük | Central Anatolia | 7,400–6,000 BCE | Shrines, murals, bull horns | Domestic ritualism; transition to household cults distinct from megalithic centers |
2. HOW GÖBEKLI TEPE EMERGES FROM A MUCH OLDER RITUAL TRADITION
Göbekli Tepe and the Deep Ritual Substrate of Anatolia
Although Göbekli Tepe (c. 9,600–8,800 BCE) stands as the earliest known monumental ritual architecture, it did not emerge ex nihilo. Rather, the site represents the apex of a much older ritual continuum extending deep into the Paleolithic record of Anatolia.
- intentional burial of the dead
- manipulation of ochre
- creation of ornaments and personal symbols
- ritual hearths and structured living areas
- animal-associated deposits and food offerings
These practices signal a long-standing cognitive ecology of the sacred, in which early humans perceived and enacted relational ties between themselves, non-human animals, and the landscape.
As populations moved through Late Pleistocene climatic shifts (127,000 to 9,700 BCE), the symbolic repertoire expanded. Sites like Pınarbaşı show increased communal feasting and structured ritual events between 13,000–10,000 BCE... behaviors that foreshadow the large-scale ceremonial gatherings found at later PPNA sites.
By the 12th–10th millennia BCE, the Taş Tepeler cultural horizon (Karahan Tepe, Hamzan Tepe, Sefer Tepe, Göbekli Tepe, etc.) reveals a fully crystallized ritual architecture. The monumental T-shaped pillars, anthropomorphic forms, and carved fauna encode a mythic cosmology that clearly draws on much older animistic, shamanic, and totemic grammars of meaning.
Thus Göbekli Tepe is best understood as a culmination, not the beginning but a culmination of the architectural flowering of a religious awakening whose paleolithic roots extend deeply into the evolutionary emergence of Homo sapiens’ symbolic and spiritual cognition journey.
3. MIGRATION & CULTURAL LINEAGE FROM LATE PALEOLITHIC ANATOLIA TO PPNA RITUAL COMPLEXES
1. Late Paleolithic (c. 50,000–20,000 BCE)Anatolia is inhabited by mobile foragers whose ritual life centers on caves, seasonal camps, and natural features. Symbolic objects, pigment use, and structured burials indicate the presence of shamanic mediation and animistic cosmologies.
2. Epipaleolithic (c. 20,000–11,000 BCE)
- Hunter-gatherer communities grow denser in resource-rich areas. Ritual feasting begins to expand in scale.
- The first evidence of sedentism-before-agriculture appears, especially in the Levant and Upper Mesopotamia.
3. Proto-PPNA (c. 11,500–10,500 BCE)Climatic stabilization after the Younger Dryas allows larger seasonal congregations. Sites like Karahan Tepe demonstrate complex symbolic carving traditions that anticipate the T-pillar iconography at Göbekli Tepe. Here, communal ritual gatherings become socially central.4. PPNA (c. 10,000–9,000 BCE)Monumental ritual architecture appears at Göbekli Tepe, Sefer Tepe, Hamzan Tepe, Harbetsuvan Tepe, and others. These sites served as:
- seasonal gathering places
- loci of mythic storytelling
- cosmological observatories
- regional social integrators
- platforms for emerging religious specialists
5. Transition to PPNB (c. 9,000–8,000 BCE)Ritual centers become less monumental as domestic architecture (e.g., Nevalı Çori) takes over religious life. This shift marks the domestication of the sacred, paralleling the domestication of plants and animals. In this framework, Göbekli Tepe is not the birth of religion, but the architectural expression of an already ancient religious consciousness that took shape over tens of thousands of years.
No comments:
Post a Comment