Literal, grammatical, historical, contextual... all good approaches except one. Drop the literal reading of the bible where we read our belief sets, cultural mores, and prejudices into the bible. It misinforms and leads to bad theology.
But the last three approaches well informs the Hebraic or Greek Hellenistic beliefs of that day. Not so the literal reading of those ancient cultures.
Which means a good hermenuetic is redactive to the text per the rules (beliefs) of those ancient societal eras.
Which is also why theology is so full of interpretive meanings for different sects and denominations.
The best hermenuetic I have found is this:
"God is love regardless of what religious man thought of God in the OT and NT."
To underscore my point, the Abrahamic Covenant is the same as the New Covenant. God sacrifices Himself in order to enforce and assure His covenant with mankind through Abraham (saved by faith as response to divine act) and later at the Cross through Christ in the New Covenant.
In sum, the best hermenuetic is "Love = Jesus". Put it at the center of all bible readings and not the "bible" per se.
God's Love informs our reading, our faith, our doctrines, our judgments, our actions, our responses, and our worship. Putting any other doctrine in the center removes Love, making God something other than He is.
R.E. Slater
October 13, 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment