Thursday, February 27, 2025

Comparing Process Theology to the Patristic Theology of the First Millennium Church


Comparing Process Theology to the
Patristic Theology of the First Millennium

Compiled by R.E. Slater
February 27, 2025

Please Note: I've utilized AI to draw the pictures below. In this series, ChatGPT 4.0 has tended towards a mystic eastern representation of the early orthodox doctrines rather than the more typically cold and sterile pictures of western medievalism. And since Whiteheadian philosophy feels more Buddhistic than Western Analytical it's all good. Also note, Process is different from Buddhism in significantly major ways though each also share common sympathies in how we live out our lives in beauty and harmony with one another. - re slater

Whitehead's process philosophy offers a fascinating lens through which to reconsider traditional church orthodoxy—not as a static doctrinal construct, but as an evolving, dynamic reality, shaped by relational and experiential factors. His emphasis on becoming rather than being challenges traditional metaphysical assumptions about church orthodoxy, allowing for a more open-ended, dynamically organic living tradition.

If we were to map Whitehead’s influence onto the historical development of early orthodoxy, we might see his work as offering a reframing of theological discourse—one that acknowledges classical doctrines but seeks to integrate them into a more processual and relational paradigm based upon his development of Process Philosophy from which Process Theology derives.

Many of these themes have been reflected elsewhere in this website. Too, Process themes can be individualized to the thematic motif under discussion. This means that process theology will react differently to second and third millennial church orthodoxies in comparison to first millennial church orthodoxies. This is the beauty of a holistic process-based philosophic construct which can supersede all previous, earlier visions of God, life, universe, and meaning. And as an integral philosophy it will be around for a long while; having been discussed in ancient Greek philosophy, redefined by Whitehead et al, and proving adept in the quantum sciences, etc.


R.E. Slater
February 27, 2025

Exploring How Process Theology Can

Transform Key Orthodox Doctrines

By moving church orthodox off it's Hellenistic philosophic foundations (Platonism, NeoPlatonism, Aristotelianism, etc) onto the foundations of process philosophy orthodox church doctrine then may escalate upwards into a vibrant, transformative construct which is more dynamic, relational, and evolving as a contemporary framework now able to dialogue with the sciences and metamodern academia across all areas and topics.


AI Art of the Trinity  |  R.E. Slater

1. The Trinity: From Static Essence to Dynamic Relationality

Traditional Orthodox View

  • The Trinity is often framed in substance metaphysics: One divine essence (ousia) in three persons (hypostases).
  • The Nicene-Chalcedonian model insists on the co-equal, co-eternal nature of Father, Son, and Spirit.

Process Theology’s Reframing

  • Rather than a static ontological unity, the Trinity is seen as a dynamic process of relational becoming.
  • God is not a fixed essence but a relational act—the interplay of divine creativity, responsiveness, and transformation.
  • The Trinity embodies a divine process of co-creative love:
    • Father → The primordial, creative source (the lure toward beauty and novelty).
    • Son → The embodied expression of God in history (concretizing divine love and relationality).
    • Spirit → The sustaining, guiding force of divine persuasion, working within creation.

Key Shift:
Orthodoxy views the Trinity in terms of immutability and essence, while process theology sees it as a living, interactive relational flow.


AI Art of Christ's Hypostatic Union  |  R.E. Slater

2. Christology: From Static Hypostatic Union to Incarnational Process

Traditional Orthodox View

  • Christ is fully divine and fully human (Chalcedon, 451).
  • The hypostatic union ensures that Jesus is a single person with two distinct natures.
  • Atonement is often framed through penal substitution or satisfaction models (sin, sacrifice, and divine justice).

Process Theology’s Reframing

  • Incarnation is not a singular event but an ongoing cosmic process.
  • Instead of a static two-nature model, Christ represents the highest actualization of divine becoming.
  • Jesus embodies God’s persuasive power, showing the world the lure toward divine harmony rather than divine coercion.
  • Atonement is relational, not juridical—Christ’s work is about persuading creation toward cooperative love rather than appeasing divine wrath.

Key Shift:
Orthodox theology emphasizes fixed divine-human unity, while process thought sees Christ as an ongoing relational process of divine becoming within creation.


AI Art of Revelation  |  R.E. Slater

3. Revelation: From Fixed Doctrine to Evolving Truth

Traditional Orthodox View

  • Scripture is often seen as inspired and authoritative, a direct deposit of divine truth.
  • Doctrines like apostolic succession and creedal formulations are viewed as once-for-all revelations.

Process Theology’s Reframing

  • Revelation is not a fixed deposit but an evolving interaction between God and creation.
  • The Bible and tradition are snapshots of evolving human engagement with God, not final blueprints.
  • Truth unfolds as God continuously interacts with the world.
  • Theology is never static but participatory—our understanding of God is always growing.

Key Shift:
Orthodoxy views revelation as fixed and final, while process theology sees it as unfolding and relational.


AI Art of the Nature of God  |  R.E. Slater

4. The Nature of God: From Immutable Being to Evolving Process

Traditional Orthodox View

  • God is unchanging (immutable) and all-powerful (omnipotent).
  • Classical theism assumes God is outside of time, foreknowing all events.

Process Theology’s Reframing

  • God is dipolar:
    • Primordial nature (envisioning all possibilities).
    • Consequent nature (experiencing and responding to creation).
  • God is not coercive but persuasive, working through relational influence rather than unilateral control.
  • God changes in response to creation—not in essence, but in relational engagement.

Key Shift:
Orthodoxy views God as timeless and unchanging, while process theology sees God as deeply interactive and evolving.


AI Art of the Christian Eschatology  |  R.E. Slater

5. Eschatology: From Apocalyptic End to Open Future

Traditional Orthodox View

  • Linear eschatology: History moves toward final judgment, resurrection, and new creation.
  • The future is predetermined (Augustinian predestination in some traditions).

Process Theology’s Reframing

  • The future is not predetermined—God and creation co-create the open possibilities of becoming.
  • Heaven and transformation are about processual renewal, not sudden apocalyptic events.
  • The eschaton is not a fixed endpoint but an ever-expanding realization of divine harmony.

Key Shift:
Orthodoxy sees eschatology as linear and finalized, while process theology sees it as open-ended and co-creative.


Conclusion: A Living Orthodoxy

Rather than dismissing traditional orthodoxy, Process Theology reframes it as a dynamic, evolving interaction between God and creation.

  • Instead of “orthodoxy” as a static boundary, it becomes a participatory unfolding.
  • Instead of fixed doctrines, theology is an ongoing dialogue between God and the world.
  • Instead of a top-down divine plan, the universe is co-created with God through relational persuasion.



Here is a visual chart mapping these doctrinal shifts:

Doctrinal Reinterpretation: Orthodoxy vs. Process Theology

Doctrine

Traditional Orthodox View

Process Theology View

Trinity

Fixed essence, three persons in one divine substance

Relational dynamism, ongoing divine becoming

Christology

Static two-nature hypostatic union

Christ as the highest actualization of divine process

Revelation

Finalized revelation in scripture and creeds

Unfolding revelation, evolving divine-human interaction

Nature of God

Immutable, omnipotent, outside time

Dipolar, evolving, responsive to creation

Eschatology

Linear, predetermined end of history

Open-ended, co-created future with God




Just for fun, here is AI's metamodern reinterpretations of each topic, now incorporating Whitehead’s process philosophy within an Orthodox iconographic framework:

  1. Trinity – A relational dynamism of divine becoming.
  2. Christology – Christ as the Redeeming Logos producing a continually evolving relationality.
  3. Revelation – An infinite unfolding scroll, symbolizing continuous divine-human dialogue.
  4. Nature of God – A woven, interactive force, deeply relational rather than distant.
  5. Eschatology – A co-created, evolving future, rather than a static final judgment.

The images now merge classical orthodoxy, process theology, and metamodern aesthetics, visually expressing the dynamic, participatory nature of divine reality.


The Trinity as a relational dynamism of divine becoming

AI Art of the Processual Trinity  |  R.E. Slater

Christ as the Redeeming Logos producing a continually evolving relationality

AI Art of the Processual Christ as Logos of God  |  R.E. Slater

Revelation as an infinitely unfolding scroll symbolizing continuous divine-human-eco/cosmic dialogue

AI Art of the Processual Revelation  |  R.E. Slater

The Nature of God as a woven, interactive force which is deeply relational
rather than a distant non-presence

AI Art of the Processual Nature of God  |  R.E. Slater

The co-created, evolving future of the church as vs a static final judgment

AI Art of the Processual Eschaton  |  R.E. Slater

The History of Western & Eastern Church Orthodoxy


The History of Western & Eastern Church Orthodoxy

Compiled by R.E. Slater

The history of Western and Eastern Church Orthodoxy is marked by a gradual divergence in beliefs and practices, culminating in the "Great Schism" of 1054, which formally split the Christian Church into the Roman Catholic Church (West) and the Eastern Orthodox Church (East), primarily due to theological disputes, political tensions, and differing views on papal authority, with the key difference being the Western Church's addition of the "Filioque" clause to the Nicene Creed, signifying the Holy Spirit proceeding from both the Father and the Son, a concept not accepted by the East.

Key points in the history of the East-West Schism:

Early Christian Unity:

In the early centuries of Christianity, the Church was unified, with both the East (centered in Constantinople) and the West (centered in Rome) sharing the same core beliefs and practices, though cultural differences were already present.

Growing Tensions:

Over time, tensions arose regarding the authority of the Pope in Rome, particularly in the East where the Byzantine Emperor held significant influence over the Church.

Theological Disputes:
  • Filioque: The most significant theological disagreement was the addition of the "Filioque" clause to the Nicene Creed by the Western Church, which stated that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son.
  • Iconoclasm: The controversy surrounding the veneration of icons also contributed to the rift, with the East generally supporting iconography while the West experienced periods of iconoclasm.
The Photian Schism (9th Century):

A major turning point, where Patriarch Photius of Constantinople challenged the authority of the Pope, leading to a temporary schism.

The Great Schism (1054):

The official split occurred in 1054 when Pope Leo IX and Patriarch Michael Cerularius excommunicated each other, marking the formal separation between the Eastern and Western Churches.

Distinctive features of Eastern Orthodoxy:
  • Centrality of the Eucharist: Emphasis on the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
  • Iconography: Extensive use of religious icons in worship
  • Synodal Structure: Decision-making power shared among bishops through councils
  • Liturgical Language: Primarily in the Greek language
Distinctive features of Western Catholicism:
  • Papal Primacy: The Pope is considered the head of the Church with ultimate authority
  • Development of Scholastic Theology: Greater emphasis on philosophical reasoning in theological discussions
  • Latin Liturgy: Primarily conducted in Latin

References

The Great Schism of 1054
Why the Catholic West and Orthodox East Divided
18:25



History of Roman Catholicism & Eastern Orthodoxy





The First Millennial Age of the Church


The First Millennial Age of the Church

Compiled by R.E. Slater
We have lately reviewed over the past several days : i) Israel's Priestly history and the ii) Early Church's history through it's Church Fathers let's now expand our view to encompense the iii) history of the church through the first millennium. 




Definition and Historical Overview of Church Orthodoxy

Definition: Church orthodoxy refers to the officially recognized and doctrinally authoritative beliefs and practices of Christianity, particularly as they were shaped by theological councils, creeds, and ecclesiastical leadership throughout history. It was formulated in response to doctrinal disputes, heretical movements, and cultural shifts, establishing a standardized theological framework within various Christian traditions.


Historical Charting of Church Orthodoxy

Using the Patriarchal Fathers as the initiating point, we can trace the development of church orthodoxy through major figures, councils, and theological developments.

1. The Desert and Patriarchal Fathers (3rd–4th Century)

  • Paul of Thebes (c. 226–c. 341) – Traditionally regarded as the first Christian hermit.
  • Anthony the Great (c. 251–356) – Founder of Christian monasticism, emphasized asceticism as a means to spiritual purity.
  • Pachomius (c. 292–348) – Developed communal monasticism (cenobitism), laying the foundation for structured Christian monastic life.

2. The Early Church Fathers and the Formation of Orthodoxy (2nd–5th Century)

  • Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202) – Defended apostolic tradition and countered Gnosticism in Against Heresies.
  • Tertullian (c. 155–220) – Coined the term "Trinity" and developed early Latin theology.
  • Origen (c. 185–253) – Promoted allegorical biblical interpretation but later condemned for speculative theology.
  • Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373) – Champion of Nicene orthodoxy against Arianism.
  • Cappadocian Fathers (Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus, 4th century) – Refined Trinitarian theology.
  • Augustine of Hippo (354–430) – Key thinker in grace, original sin, and the relationship between faith and reason.

3. The Ecumenical Councils and the Solidification of Orthodoxy (4th–8th Century)

  • Council of Nicaea (325) – Defined Christ as "of one substance with the Father" (homoousios), rejecting Arianism.
  • Council of Constantinople (381) – Expanded Nicene Creed, affirming the full divinity of the Holy Spirit.
  • Council of Ephesus (431) – Rejected Nestorianism, affirming Mary as Theotokos (God-bearer).
  • Council of Chalcedon (451) – Defined Christ as having two natures, fully divine and fully human.
  • Second Council of Constantinople (553) – Clarified Christological controversies, reinforcing Chalcedonian orthodoxy.
  • Third Council of Constantinople (680–681) – Rejected Monothelitism (one-will Christology).
  • Second Council of Nicaea (787) – Affirmed the veneration of icons, resolving the first Iconoclast Controversy.

4. The Great Schism and Diverging Orthodoxies (11th Century)

  • 1054 – The Great Schism between Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches.
  • Dispute over papal primacy, theological formulations (Filioque clause), and ecclesiastical authority.

5. Scholasticism and Theological Development (12th–15th Century)

  • Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) – Formulated the ontological argument for God's existence.
  • Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) – Synthesized Aristotelian philosophy with Christian doctrine (Summa Theologica).
  • John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham – Debated metaphysics, divine will, and human freedom.

6. Reformation and the Challenge to Orthodoxy (16th Century)

  • Martin Luther (1483–1546) – Rejected indulgences and papal authority, emphasizing justification by faith.
  • John Calvin (1509–1564) – Developed Reformed theology, predestination, and covenantal soteriology.
  • Council of Trent (1545–1563) – Catholic Counter-Reformation, reaffirming traditional doctrine.

7. Modern Theological Developments and Challenges (17th–21st Century)

  • Enlightenment & Rationalism (17th–18th century) – Rise of deism and higher biblical criticism.
  • 19th–20th Century Theological Movements
    • Neo-Orthodoxy (Karl Barth, 20th century) – Reacted against liberal theology, emphasizing divine revelation.
    • Process Theology (Alfred North Whitehead, 20th century) – Introduced dynamic, relational views of God.
    • Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, and Postmodern Theology (21st century) – Fragmentation and contextualization of theological perspectives.

Conclusion

Church orthodoxy evolved in response to doctrinal disputes, cultural shifts, and philosophical challenges. From the Patriarchal Fathers and monastic ascetics to the ecumenical councils, medieval scholastics, Reformation thinkers, and modern theologians, orthodoxy has been both a defining standard and an adaptable framework. The Process Theology perspective, particularly its relational and evolutionary aspects, provides an alternative yet integrative approach to orthodoxy in contemporary theological discourse.

The First MIllenium Church's Family Tree is NOT a Single Trunk





Christian Origins & Early Schisms

Philip Schaff's The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers.

Patristics, also known as Patrology, is a branch of theological studies focused on the writings and teachings of the Church Fathers, between the 1st to 8th centuries CE. Scholars analyze texts from both orthodox and heretical authors. Patristics emerged as a distinct discipline in the 19th century, supported by critical editions like Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca. The field employs textual analysis, archaeology, and historical criticism to analyze early Christianity’s doctrinal, cultural, and intellectual development, incorporating traditions beyond Greek and Latin, such as Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, and Ethiopian.

Etymology

Patrology, derived from the Latin pater (father) and Greek logos (discourse), primarily refers to the study of the Church Fathers and serves as an introduction to early Christian writings. Historically, it also included large compilations of these writings, such as Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca by Migne.[1]

The term patristics similarly originates from pater in Latin and πᾰτήρ in Greek, both meaning "father," and was introduced by English philosopher Isaac Taylor.[2] Meanwhile, Patrologia was coined by Johann Gerhard, who published a book by the same name in 1653.[3] The formal classification of patristics as a distinct theological discipline was later established by Johann Franz Buddeus in his Historical and Systematic Introduction to Theology (1730).[4]

Scope

Patristics is the study of the writings and thought of the Church Fathers, theologians active from the late 1st century to the 8th century CE during the Patristic Age.[5] Closely linked to Church history and early Christian doctrine, it analyzes primary sources that shaped Christian theology, including polemical writings, orations, sermons, letters, and poems, as well as systematic treatises on doctrine and works of biblical exegesis and scriptural commentary. Additionally, Patristic texts span diverse traditions, cultural contexts, and languages, including Greek, Latin, Syriac, Ethiopian, Armenian, and Coptic.[6] The Church Fathers played a key role in defending orthodox Christianity against heresies and interpreting the faith.[5]

Modern scholars, such as Shawn J. Wilhite (2024), define Patristics as spanning from 90–750 CE and incorporating both orthodox and heretical writings for historical context.[7][8] The field employs a multidisciplinary approach, integrating textual analysis, archaeology, art history, philosophy, and religious history to reconstruct early Christianity’s intellectual and cultural landscape.[9]

Patrology and Patristics

Some scholars, particularly in Germany, distinguish patrology from patristics. Josef Fessler defines patrology as the study of the authenticity, authority, and use of the Church Fathers’ works, while patristics focuses on their theological thought. Karl Keating similarly describes patrology as the study of the Fathers as historical figures, whereas patristics examines their teachings. However, these distinctions are not widely observed, as both fields overlap within theological and literary studies.[10][11]

Historical development

Early engagement (Pre 5th century)

Eusebius is identified as the earliest to document the history of Christian literature. According to his 4th century book Ecclesiastical History, states his intention to report on those who were ambassadors of the word of God by speech or by pen, listing their names, numbers, and ages. Thus, his work is a crucial source of Patrology, especially as many writings he quotes have been lost, making him the only source of information for some ecclesiastical authors.[12]

During the same century, Jerome was the pioneer in documenting the history of Christian theological literature. In his work De viris illustribus (On Illustrious Men), he aimed to address the mockery from pagans who often ridiculed the intellectual capabilities of Christians.[12]

With the advent of the printing press in the 15th century, interest in patristic writings surged. Medieval scholars, Protestant Reformers, and Caroline divines extensively studied the Church Fathers, particularly figures such as Augustine, Jerome, and John Chrysostom. However, these studies were often influenced by apologetic and polemical lenses, reflecting the theological debates of the time.[13]

Emergence as a discipline (15-19th century)

Modern patristics emerged in the 19th century, spurred by institutions, such as universities, seminaries, and academic conferences. The development of scholarly tools, including critical editions of texts (e.g., Patrologia Latina) and journals like Studia Patristica.[14] Additionally, continued ecumenical dialogue reduced tensions between Chalcedonian and Oriental Orthodox traditions allowing for revitalized interest in non-Greek/Latin Fathers.[15]

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, scholars in Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy made significant philological advancements, acquiring and cataloging new manuscripts. The discovery of the Nag Hammadi Gnostic library and John Chrysostom’s baptismal catecheses on Mount Athos (1955) were major milestones.[16]

With the introduction of microfilming technology, institutions like the British LibraryVatican Library, and Bibliothèque Nationale preserved and expanded access to patristic manuscripts. Since the 1940s, scholarly efforts have focused on careful textual revisions and comparative analyses rather than new manuscript discoveries.[16]

Discipline issues

Beyond the Western world

Modern scholars have increasingly recognized diverse Christian communities beyond Rome and Constantinople. This shift has led to a more nuanced understanding of the Church Fathers' impact across different traditions. Some theologians revered in one tradition were considered heretical in another, highlighting the theological diversity of early Christianity.[17]

The Western definition of the Patristic Age has also been re-evaluated. Traditionally, Venerable Bede (d. 735) marks its conclusion in the Latin West, and John of Damascus (d. 749) in the Greek East. However, later Byzantine theologians such as Symeon the New Theologian and Gregory Palamas, along with Oriental Orthodox figures, continue to be studied in Patristics. This reevaluation challenges Eurocentric periodization and acknowledges the continued intellectual and theological evolution of Christianity beyond the traditional Western framework.[17]

Major centres of thought

The major locations of the early Church fathers were RomeConstantinopleAlexandriaAntioch, and the area of western north Africa around CarthageMilan and Jerusalem were also sites.[18]

Theological developments

Major focuses for these theologians during the period are, in chronological order:[19]

  1. Christianity's relationship with Judaism
  2. Establishment of the New Testament canon
  3. Apologetics (the 'defense' or 'explanation' of Christianity)
  4. Doctrinal discussions that sought to achieve consistency of faith, in particular within the Christianized Roman Empire.

Furthermore, McGrath (1998) notes several major areas of theology can be seen to have developed during the Patristic Period: the extent of the New Testament canon, the role of tradition, the fixing of the ecumenical creeds, the two natures of Christ, the doctrine of the Trinity, the doctrine of the Church, and the doctrine of divine grace.[20]

Notable Church Fathers

The key individuals of patristic literature include:[21]

Contemporary approaches

Understanding Patristics in the 21st century presents several challenges. McGrath identifies four key difficulties: the perceived lack of relevance in some theological debates, the influence of classical philosophy, the doctrinal diversity among the Church Fathers, and the divisions between Greek (Eastern) and Latin (Western) theological traditions, particularly in their use of philosophical frameworks.[22]

In response to these challenges, neo-patristic and post-patristic approaches advocate for reinterpreting or critically reassessing the Church Fathers in light of modern developments. These perspectives argue that early Christian writings reflect the concerns of their historical context and may require adaptation. However, these approaches remain controversial among orthodox theologians, who caution that such reinterpretations could undermine traditional theological continuity.[23][24]

Sources and collection of texts

Original language collection

A vast number of patristic texts are preserved in their original languages through major scholarly collections. One of the most comprehensive efforts is Jacques Paul Migne’s Patrologia Latina and Patrologia Graeca, which compile extensive writings from the Latin and Greek Church Fathers, respectively.[25]

For texts in Syriac and other Eastern languages, the Patrologia Orientalis (formerly Patrologia Syriaca) provides a significant, though incomplete, collection. It is largely supplemented by the Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium, which includes additional Eastern Christian writings.[26][27]

Other critical editions and re-edited patristic texts, including newly discovered works and revised attributions, are found in:

Peer-reviewed journals

Several peer-reviewed journals are recognized for their contributions to the study of early Christianity and Patristics. These journals, many of which are accessible online, include:[28]

See also

Ancient Christian texts and collections

Academic fields and studies

Key theological and historical topics

Notes

References

  1. ^ Stausberg, M., & Vevaina, Y. S.-D. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley Blackwell companion to patristics (p. 51). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-118-43871-8. https://slavicabyzantina.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/parry_kenneth_the_wiley_blackwell_companion_to_z-lib.org_.pdf
  2. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). From patristics to early Christian studies. In S. A. Harvey & D. G. Hunter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies (pp. 7–41). Oxford University Press. https://elearning.unito.it/scienzeumanistiche/pluginfile.php/222457/mod_resource/content/2/Clark_From%20Patristics%20to%20Early%20Christian%20Studies_39%2078.pdf
  3. ^ Quasten, J. (1986). Patrology: Volume I, The beginnings of patristic literature. Christian Classics, Inc (p. 1). (Original work published 1950).
  4. ^ Bitton-Ashkelony, B., de Bruyn, T., & Harrison, C. (Eds.). (2015). Patristic studies in the twenty-first century: Proceedings of an international conference to mark the 50th anniversary of the International Association of Patristic Studies (p. 368). Brepols. ISBN 978-2-503-55919-3. https://www.antikes-christentum.de/fileadmin/_migrated/tx_nimediathek/Patristics_and_Theology.pdf
  5. Jump up to:a b Cross, F. L., & Livingstone, E. A. (Eds.). (2005). Patristics. In The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780192802903.001.0001/acref-9780192802903-e-5194?rskey=wbbGE1&result=6
  6. ^ Humfress, C. (2015). Patristic sources. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, 97-118.
  7. ^ Wilhite, S. J. (2024). The state of patristic studies. Religious Studies Review, 50(4), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17552
  8. ^ (Quasten, 1986, p. 1)
  9. ^ Kannengiesser, C. (1989). Fifty years of patristica. Theological Studies, 50(4), 640. Retrieved from https://theologicalstudies.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/50.4.1.pdf
  10. ^ "Patrology"Catholic Answers. Retrieved 2023-07-05.
  11. ^ Keating, Karl (1988). Catholicism and Fundamentalism: The Attack on "Romanism" by "Bible Christians". San Francisco: Ignatius Press. p. 330ISBN 9780898701951.
  12. Jump up to:a b (Quasten, 1986, p. 1)
  13. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). "From Patristics to Early Christian Studies" (PDF). In Harvey, S. A.; Hunter, D. G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 7–41. ISBN 978-0199271566.
  14. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). From patristics to early Christian studies. In S. A. Harvey & D. G. Hunter (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian studies (pp. 7–41). Oxford University Press. https://elearning.unito.it/scienzeumanistiche/pluginfile.php/222457/mod_resource/content/2/Clark_From%20Patristics%20to%20Early%20Christian%20Studies_39%2078.pdf
  15. ^ Clark, E. A. (2008). "From Patristics to Early Christian Studies" (PDF). In Harvey, S. A.; Hunter, D. G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 7–41. ISBN 978-0199271566.
  16. Jump up to:a b (Kannengiesser, 1989, p. 640)
  17. Jump up to:a b Stausberg, M., & Vevaina, Y. S.-D. (Eds.). (2015). The Wiley Blackwell companion to patristics (p. 4). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-118-43871-8. https://slavicabyzantina.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/parry_kenneth_the_wiley_blackwell_companion_to_z-lib.org_.pdf
  18. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 20–22.
  19. ^ McGrath. op.cit. Ch. 1.
  20. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 27–37.
  21. ^ "Patristic literature | Definition, History, Fathers, Works, Period, & Facts | Britannica"www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2025-02-04.
  22. ^ McGrath. op.cit. pp. 23.
  23. ^ Metropolitan of Nafpaktus ΝΕΟΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΤΑΠΑΤΕΡΙΚΗ "ΘΕΟΛΟΓΙΑ"
  24. ^ Dr. Triantafyllos Sioulis, «Πατερικός φονταμενταλισμός» ή «μετα-πατερική θεολογική θολούρα» Archived 2011-11-01 at the Wayback Machine
  25. ^ Bauer, W. (1988). Griechisch-deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Schriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Literatur (Vol. 43, Issue 2). de gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110860269
  26. ^ Wallace-Hadrill, D. S. (1974). Eusebius of Caesarea’s Commentary on Luke: Its Origin and Early History. Harvard Theological Review67(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017816000003151
  27. ^ Lang, D. M. (1957). Recent Work on the Georgian New Testament. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies19(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x00119214
  28. ^ Estelle-Holmer, Suzanne. "Yale University Library Research Guides: Early Christianity and Patristics: Journals"guides.library.yale.edu. Retrieved 2025-02-04.

Sources

Audio

Online collections

Others